分类: world

  • China steps up ‘propaganda blitz’ in Turkey amid investment fallout

    China steps up ‘propaganda blitz’ in Turkey amid investment fallout

    When Chinese electric vehicle giant BYD paused plans to construct a manufacturing plant in Turkey back in June, shifting its production priorities to existing European facilities, the decision sent ripples through bilateral relations between Ankara and Beijing. What made the reversal particularly awkward for Turkey’s ruling government was the suite of generous tax breaks Ankara had already granted to BYD for domestic vehicle sales, long before any ground was broken on the promised facility.

    The early incentives have already paid major dividends for BYD: the automaker’s Turkish sales skyrocketed to more than 45,000 units in 2025, and industry experts estimate the tax advantages have netted the firm between $500 million and $1 billion in extra profits from the Turkish market to date. The collapse of the plant deal left Beijing’s reputation in Turkey on shaky ground, prompting a sweeping public relations push to reverse the growing negative sentiment, according to a Turkish government consultant who spoke to Middle East Eye.

    Ankara, the consultant added, has grown increasingly frustrated with what it views as a pattern of Chinese negotiating behavior: creating the perception that a final binding agreement has been reached, only to return to the table later with an expanded list of new demands. For observers who track China’s activities in Turkey closely, the accelerated PR campaign has been impossible to miss.

    China’s embassy in Ankara has begun placing unsigned, pro-Beijing opinion pieces in pro-government Turkish media, emphasizing the strategic importance of high-level ties between the Chinese Communist Party and Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP). The embassy has also pushed widespread coverage of the launch of *Volume Five of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China* across government-aligned Turkish media outlets.

    Nurettin Akcay, a Turkish academic who specializes in Chinese affairs, confirms that the BYD collapse has undeniably amplified anti-China sentiment among the Turkish public. He notes, however, that the expansion of China’s public diplomacy work in Turkey is not an entirely new development—Beijing has long cultivated ties with Turkish journalists and opinion leaders, regularly organizing all-expenses-paid visits to China long before the BYD deal fell through.

    Turkey and China have navigated a fraught bilateral relationship for more than a decade, with the status of the Uyghur people serving as the most persistent and divisive sticking point. Until 2020, Ankara worked to limit critical Turkish media coverage of human rights abuses against Uyghurs in Xinjiang, holding out hope that the gesture would clear the way for large-scale Chinese investment. In a high-profile step to improve ties at Beijing’s request, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan visited the Uyghur-majority Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in June 2024, a trip billed as resolving one of the core barriers to closer economic cooperation. Yet despite months of negotiations in the wake of Fidan’s visit, the promised electric vehicle plant investments from both BYD and fellow Chinese automaker Chery have yet to move forward.

    Akcay, who earned his PhD from Shanghai University, has faced personal repercussions for his public tracking of Chinese lobbying efforts in Turkey. He recently revealed via social media platform X that Shanghai University sent him an official email notifying him that the institution had received dozens of complaints over his critical reporting on China. As a result, the university asked him to stop publicly referencing his PhD degree earned at the school, and Akcay says he now expects he will be permanently barred from re-entering China.

    Akcay explains that Beijing’s current outreach strategy in Turkey centers on what he terms “elite engagement”: a curated form of showcase diplomacy that invites prominent Turkish figures to visit carefully selected sites across China to project a sanitized, positive image of the country to the Turkish public. Last month, for example, the China-Turkey Friendship Foundation—a Chinese state-funded organization—organized an eight-day press tour to Xinjiang for journalists from leading Turkish opposition and independent outlets, including T24, Halk TV, Cumhuriyet and Haberturk TV.

    None of the participating journalists published coverage echoing international allegations of systemic mistreatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang; instead, their reports focused on what they described as terrorist threats from radical groups in the region and China’s economic integration policies. Multiple outlets used nearly identical phrasing in their coverage, highlighting Xinjiang’s central role to China’s industrial growth and the Belt and Road Initiative, while framing tourism as a core driver of the region’s development.

    This curated narrative directly contradicts findings from global human rights organizations. Human Rights Watch’s 2026 World Report documented that Chinese authorities have tightened ideological controls across Xinjiang and Tibet over the past year, while continuing a harsh campaign of forced assimilation against Uyghur and Tibetan communities. The organization notes that there has never been accountability for crimes against humanity in Xinjiang, where hundreds of thousands of Uyghurs remain arbitrarily detained. Since 2017, the Chinese government has detained hundreds of thousands of Uyghurs in extrajudicial “re-education camps,” demolished thousands of mosques and Islamic cemeteries, and banned religious education for Uyghur communities across Xinjiang.

    “Everything is planned, and China gets precisely what it wants because visitors are shown only what they are intended to see,” Akcay said. “Consequently, journalists who visit China encounter a positive picture without fully understanding the broader context of human rights abuses in the region.”

    Beyond outreach to journalists and ruling party allies, China’s recent influence campaign in Turkey has expanded to include direct engagement with Turkey’s opposition parties, including the conservative Islamist New Welfare Party and the nationalist Victory Party. A New Welfare Party delegation traveled to China in June, and Chinese Ambassador to Turkey Jiang Xuebin met the party’s chairman Fatih Erbakan just last month. Akcay says Beijing has worked to build positive ties with nearly all of Turkey’s opposition factions, regardless of size, with the Uyghur issue once again serving as the core motivating factor.

    Right-wing opposition parties in Turkey can speak relatively openly about the Uyghur issue because it resonates strongly with their conservative, nationalist voter bases, Akcay explains. By cultivating ties across the entire political spectrum, Beijing aims to blunt rising domestic criticism of China within Turkey, and prevent that criticism from escalating into large-scale grassroots campaigns against Chinese investment or policy. While Akcay does not believe the campaign has completely reshaped Turkish public opinion of China, he assesses that the strategy has been partially successful in preventing the emergence of a coordinated, radical counter-movement.

    “China is seeking to minimise domestic criticism within Turkey by pursuing a broad engagement strategy,” he noted, adding: “It may not completely transform public perceptions, but it is pursuing an effective strategy to prevent the emergence of a radical counter-campaign.”

  • The China positivity, US negativity illusion

    The China positivity, US negativity illusion

    For nearly 20 years, a consistent trend defined global public opinion: the United States held a clear lead over China in global favorability ratings. That long-standing pattern has shifted, with new polling showing China now viewed more positively than the US across a majority of surveyed nations.

    The landmark finding comes from Pew Research Center’s July 15 report, which draws on 42,151 interviews conducted across 36 countries between February and May 2026. Confidence in Chinese leader Xi Jinping also sits 10 percentage points higher than confidence in US President Donald Trump across 20 nations Pew has tracked continuously since 2023, a crossover that Gallup first recorded a full year earlier, when it put China’s global approval at 36% and the US at 31%.

    While many are quick to frame this shift as a straightforward win for China and defeat for the US, a deeper analysis of the data tells a far more nuanced story. Far from a dramatic surge in China’s global standing that propelled it to the top spot, the crossover is driven almost entirely by a steep collapse in global approval of the United States. To frame this dynamic correctly, we can draw a distinction common in medical practice: measuring the current prevalence of a disease is a very different question than tracking the rate of new infections, and favorability polling blurs these two lines in ways that change the interpretation of this reversal.

    China’s global standing has improved only modestly in recent years, while the US’s has plummeted. To take one striking example: in Sweden, the share of respondents who view the US as a reliable partner dropped 52 percentage points from 83% in 2022 to just 31% in 2026. Over the same period, China’s favorable rating rose only 15 points, from 12% to 27%. A similar pattern plays out in Canada, where perceptions of US reliability fell 48 points, while Chinese reliability gained 30 points. Even in regions where Xi holds a double-digit lead over Trump in approval, enthusiasm remains muted; his highest rating in Europe is just 37%, recorded in the United Kingdom.

    In short, China’s new lead is a product of subtraction rather than gain. Pew’s own internal analysis confirms this, noting the crossover stems largely from rapidly souring global views of the United States. As the old analogy goes, one patient does not become healthier simply because the patient in the next bed is declining faster.

    The composition of the survey sample also shapes the headline finding. Nearly half of the nations included in Pew’s poll are middle-income countries, the exact grouping where China holds its widest global advantage. This year, China hit record-high favorability ratings in Colombia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Nigeria, and Turkey. Across the 17 middle-income publics included in the survey, a median 75% of respondents say the US interferes in the internal affairs of other countries, compared to just 45% who say the same of China. If the sample were weighted more heavily toward wealthy democracies or China’s immediate regional neighbors, the topline result would look very different.

    This regional divide is a critical, underdiscussed takeaway for Asian audiences. The overall global reversal of fortune has notably not occurred among China’s neighboring states. The US retains a favorability edge in just six nations surveyed, and four of those are in the Indo-Pacific: India, Japan, the Philippines, and South Korea. In the Philippines, 81% of respondents call the US a reliable partner, compared to just 42% who say the same of China. In Pakistan, the numbers flip: 84% trust China, while only 36% trust the US.

    Geography continues to shape perceptions dramatically: sharing a border or competing maritime claims with a great power tends to erode public goodwill, and Asia is far from converging on a single unified view of China. Instead, regional opinion is split sharply along lines of proximity.

    One of the most notable underreported trends from this new data is the extraordinary speed of this shift, rather than just the shift itself. The ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute’s annual survey of Southeast Asian opinion has flipped three times in just three years: it favored China 50.5% to 49.5% in 2024, shifted back to a 52.3% to 47.7% lead for the US in 2025, and flipped again to a 52% to 48% lead for China in 2026.

    Public opinion that swings this sharply is not built on decades of accumulated goodwill. Instead, it behaves like a volatile spot commodity price, reacting immediately to the latest policy shock: a new tariff announcement, an energy market disruption, or an ill-considered diplomatic remark. Pew’s own historical data confirms how quickly these trends can reverse: American favorability and confidence in the US president jumped sharply immediately after the 2021 presidential inauguration, highlighting how rapidly sentiment can shift.

    Global favorability polling also conceals as much information as it reveals. A single aggregate favorability score lumps together conflicting attitudes toward a country. For example, many respondents around the world can admire China’s cutting-edge electric vehicle technology, world-leading high-speed rail network, and global cultural breakout hits such as *Black Myth: Wukong* and *Ne Zha 2*, while still holding deep distrust of China’s system of governance.

    Across the 36 surveyed countries, only 11 have half or more of respondents agreeing that the Chinese government respects the personal freedoms of its people. The United States still leads China on this metric, though the gap has narrowed almost entirely because public faith in the US’s commitment to personal freedoms has fallen sharply, dropping 25 points or more in Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, South Korea, Spain, and Sweden.

    An aggregate poll number that cannot distinguish between appreciation for a country’s consumer and cultural exports and trust in its governing institutions is a dangerous foundation for long-term policy planning.

    For middle powers across Asia, the key takeaway from this new data is neither celebration nor alarm. Right now, global publics see Beijing as a more predictable international partner than Washington, which is widely viewed as erratic. But the data itself shows that perceptions of predictability are the most volatile variable of all. A foreign policy strategy built on hedging based on 2026 sentiment could quickly be rendered obsolete by shifting opinion in 2027.

    The harder, unanswered question that remains is whether each power’s current standing is rooted in temporary conditions or structural factors: can American global approval bounce back with a new presidential administration, and can China deepen its global popularity without reforms to the governance practices that global publics continue to scrutinize?

    This year’s survey does not answer that question. It only confirms that two long-running trend lines have finally crossed. And as history shows, trend lines that cross once are very likely to cross again.

  • EU calls for stronger borders after Ceuta migrant crossings

    EU calls for stronger borders after Ceuta migrant crossings

    A sudden, chaotic mass crossing of thousands of migrants from Morocco into Spain’s North African exclave of Ceuta at the end of July has sent ripples of division across the European Union, prompting top EU leaders to demand coordinated collective action to strengthen the bloc’s external border security.

    In the wake of the unprecedented influx, latest official updates show that more than 69,500 of the migrants who entered Ceuta have already traveled back to Morocco — a figure that outpaces the initial projection of 50,000 returnees. The human cost of the crisis has been steep: 72 people have been confirmed dead on the Spanish side of the border, while an additional 11 fatalities have been recorded on Moroccan territory.

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has called for unified EU action to address gaps in border management, following the crisis. In a formal letter addressed to Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, von der Leyen commended the Spanish government for its rapid response to the emergency, but stressed that the incident exposed critical weaknesses that demand collective remediation.

    “From this incident, it is clear that we must do more to further strengthen our borders at critical points,” von der Leyen wrote. She emphasized that protecting the EU’s shared external borders is a collective responsibility for all member states, calling for enhanced vigilance, targeted monitoring and the deployment of physical infrastructure to secure high-risk crossing points where necessary.

    To address the fallout and map out a coordinated path forward, EU interior ministers will hold an emergency video conference on Tuesday. During the talks, the bloc will work to identify key lessons from the Ceuta crisis, with von der Leyen noting that irregular migration is a shared challenge that can only be resolved through a unified, collective European response rooted in solidarity.

    She laid out five core priorities for the bloc to ramp up its action: partnering with non-EU source and transit countries to prevent irregular departures in the first place; bolstering security and capacity at the EU’s external borders; rolling out continent-wide early warning systems for migration surges; dismantling transnational human smuggling networks; and streamlining processes for the safe return of migrants who do not qualify for asylum or residency.

    The crisis has already exposed deep rifts within the EU’s 27 member states over migration and border policy. In response to the Ceuta crossings, Italy unilaterally announced a temporary suspension of its Schengen Area border-free arrangements with Spain. The Schengen Agreement, one of the EU’s landmark integration projects, eliminates internal border checks across 29 European countries, serving a population of more than 450 million people.

    Italy’s move drew public backing from Finland and Denmark, while Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babiš went a step further, calling for Spain to be temporarily suspended from full Schengen membership entirely.

    Sánchez has pushed back sharply against these actions, noting that Ceuta has never been part of the Schengen Area, and that the crossing rules for the exclave do not fall under Schengen’s jurisdiction. The Spanish prime minister said he holds “serious concerns” about the positions taken by some fellow EU governments, acknowledging that most member states have offered Madrid support and solidarity, but accusing others of launching unfair political attacks driven by prejudice, misinformation, ignorance or domestic political gain.

    Spain has blamed criminal human traffickers for engineering the mass crossing, saying the smuggling networks exploited a recent ruling by the Spanish Supreme Court that restricted the government’s authority to carry out immediate deportations of irregular migrants who arrive by sea. As of Saturday, Spanish Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska confirmed that the situation in Ceuta has nearly returned to full normalcy. The government is currently developing a new inflatable floating barrier to block future unauthorized water crossings in the region.

  • Charred homes, burned out cars – before and after images show Spokane wildfire destruction

    Charred homes, burned out cars – before and after images show Spokane wildfire destruction

    When wildfires swept through parts of Spokane, Washington state in recent days, the scale of the destruction they left behind has been laid bare in stark side-by-side imagery. The verification team at BBC has conducted a detailed comparative analysis, cross-referencing user-posted videos captured in the immediate aftermath of the blaze with archived street-level photographs taken of the same neighborhoods before the fire reached the area.

    The resulting comparison leaves no room for doubt about the ferocity of the wildfire. What once stood as occupied family homes are now nothing more than blackened, charred foundations, their structures completely reduced to ash. Private vehicles parked along residential streets have been turned into melted, burned-out hulks, their metal frames warped by the extreme heat of the advancing flames. Every frame of the comparison highlights how entire blocks of the community have been fundamentally altered by the disaster, with little left intact in the most severely affected areas.

    This visual verification work comes as local emergency management teams continue to work through the process of counting damaged and destroyed structures, and accounting for displaced residents. By matching geolocated post-fire footage to pre-fire street imagery, the BBC Verify team has been able to independently confirm the scope of the damage that has already been reported by local officials, giving the public a clearer understanding of just how much the Spokane area has lost to the ongoing wildfire event.

  • German court rules comparing Israel to Nazi Germany constitutes ‘protected speech’

    German court rules comparing Israel to Nazi Germany constitutes ‘protected speech’

    In a landmark ruling that clarifies the boundaries of political expression amid heated global debate over the Israel-Gaza conflict, Germany’s Zweibrucken Higher Regional Court has overturned a lower court’s conviction and acquitted a woman who faced a €2,400 ($2,700) fine for sharing two critical Instagram posts comparing Israel’s military operations in Gaza to the atrocities of Nazi Germany.

    The posts were published at the peak of Israeli military campaign in Gaza, a period that has drawn widespread international condemnation and mass grassroots protests calling for an end to the violence. The first post featured a side-by-side table outlining parallels between Israel’s conduct in Gaza and the historical actions of the Nazi regime, paired with a split image combining the Israeli flag and the Nazi flag, with a portion of a swastika visible. The second post showed Israeli soldiers opening fire into an enclosed space, with blood depicted pooling below the structure, and overlaid a swastika inside the Star of David. Both posts were tagged with the pro-Palestinian hashtags #FREEPALESTINE and #GAZAUNDERATTACK.

    In its ruling, the court emphasized that the imagery and text included in the posts were unambiguously rooted in condemnation of Israeli military actions in Gaza, not endorsement of Nazi ideology. The judgment clarified that even when it involves the use of symbols legally banned in Germany, such speech falls under the protection of freedom of expression when the broader context clearly frames the content as criticism, political commentary, or rejection of extremist ideology. Judges noted that the #FREEPALESTINE hashtag made the woman’s political position unequivocal, and far-right sympathizers would not misinterpret the posts as promotion of neo-Nazi beliefs.

    The court explicitly rejected the common argument that any comparison between Israeli state policy and Nazi Germany automatically constitutes trivialization of the Holocaust or incitement to religious or ethnic hatred. The ruling held that sharp, critical commentary targeting the actions of a sovereign state does not automatically cross the legal threshold for criminal prosecution on these grounds. The same logic was applied to the contested combined swastika-Star of David image: the court found that the depiction of soldiers attacking unarmed civilians, paired with the #GAZAUNDERATTACK tag, made the image’s condemnatory purpose entirely clear, rooted in criticism of Israel’s military offensive rather than hateful extremism.

    While the ruling does not grant blanket immunity for all such comparisons, it establishes a critical legal precedent: Germany cannot automatically criminalize comparisons between Israeli actions and Nazi conduct when the speech in question is clearly part of an unmistakable condemnation of ongoing Israeli violence in Gaza. Following the appellate judgment, the woman was cleared of all charges against her.

  • Russia says seven killed and 40 injured by Ukrainian drone hitting busy beach

    Russia says seven killed and 40 injured by Ukrainian drone hitting busy beach

    A deadly drone strike on a crowded Black Sea holiday beach in southern Russia has left seven civilians dead, including three children, and injured dozens more, regional authorities confirmed this week. The incident, which unfolded near the small coastal village of Arkhipo-Osipovka in Krasnodar Krai, has amplified tensions over escalating cross-border attacks amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.

    Verified social media footage shared by the BBC captures the drone diving toward a coastal cliff before slamming into the sand below, erupting into a massive fireball as shocked tourists scattered on the shore and in shallow water. Krasnodar Governor Veniamin Kondratyev announced that 40 people were injured in the strike, with 17 requiring urgent hospital treatment. The regional governor immediately pinned responsibility on Ukraine, calling the incident a deliberate attack on unarmed civilian vacationers. Ukraine has not issued any official response to the accusation, and both sides have consistently denied intentionally targeting civilian populations since the full-scale Russian invasion began in February 2022.

    The target of the drone remains unconfirmed, with conflicting accounts emerging about what led to it crashing on the beach. Some Ukrainian independent outlets on the messaging platform Telegram have argued the drone veered off course after Russian electronic warfare systems jammed its navigation signal. Multiple eyewitnesses quoted by Russian media reported hearing sustained gunfire moments before the explosion, suggesting Russian air defense units attempted to shoot the drone down before it impacted the crowded coastline. Shockingly, tourists and local residents reported no air raid sirens were activated ahead of the strike, leaving vacationers completely unprepared for the attack. Many shared harrowing accounts of the chaos: one holidaymaker described hiding under sun loungers as the blast hit, while another recalled hearing machine gun-like fire before the earth-shaking explosion. One parent, whose children witnessed the incident firsthand, told reporters their child is now suffering from a severe nervous breakdown.

    Arkhipo-Osipovka’s beach has long been a top summer destination for domestic Russian tourists, a popularity that has grown even more since international sanctions imposed after the invasion barred most Russians from leisure travel to Western countries. The strike is one of a growing string of long-range attacks carried out by Ukraine deep inside Russian territory over the past 12 months, targeting energy infrastructure and commercial sites Kyiv says are being used to support Moscow’s military effort. Cross-border strikes have increasingly caused civilian casualties over recent weeks: eight civilians across multiple Russian cities were killed in attacks just last weekend.

    Separately, Ukraine has focused recent targeting campaigns on warehouses operated by Wildberries, Russia’s largest domestic e-commerce platform often called the “Russian Amazon.” The latest strike hit a Wildberries facility in the Vladimir region, roughly 100 miles east of Moscow, overnight on Monday. Dozens of the company’s warehouses scattered across Russia – many located thousands of kilometers from the Ukrainian border – have now been hit in these attacks. Kyiv argues that Wildberries depots are being repurposed to store and distribute supplies for the Russian military, a claim the Kremlin and the company reject. Public records show that until recently, the platform openly sold a range of military-related equipment including body armor, as well as dual-use materials that can be adapted for both civilian use and drone production.

    The latest civilian casualties on both sides come as long-range strikes have intensified on either side of the front line. Just on Saturday, Russian ballistic missile strikes on Kyiv killed at least nine people and injured dozens more, according to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko confirmed a residential apartment building in the city’s central Shevchenkivskyi district was partially destroyed, leaving multiple people trapped under rubble. A week earlier, a Russian strike on a residential structure in Kryvyi Rih killed an entire family of 10. Since the start of its full-scale invasion, Russia has launched thousands of strikes on Ukrainian urban residential areas, killing and wounding thousands of Ukrainian civilians.

  • Iran denies talks with US as Trump halts strikes at the last minute

    Iran denies talks with US as Trump halts strikes at the last minute

    In a sharp contradiction of former U.S. President Donald Trump’s public announcement that bilateral negotiations with Iran would kick off on Monday, Tehran has firmly denied that any direct talks with Washington are currently underway. The dispute comes just days after Trump announced he would call off planned new military strikes against Iran, a decision he framed as a step to clear the way for a diplomatic agreement.

    Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday, Trump claimed that negotiations would get underway the following afternoon, arguing that Iran had clear incentive to reach a deal. “Obviously, they don’t want to be attacked,” Trump stated. But Iran’s foreign ministry quickly pushed back on that narrative, confirming that Tehran is currently engaged in talks only with Oman focused on securing navigation through the strategic Strait of Hormuz, not with the United States.

    Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei emphasized during a formal press briefing that discussions with Oman have been constructive, with the core goal of finalizing an agreement for new safe shipping routes through the strait. “We are not currently negotiating with the United States. Our negotiations are with Oman to secure passage through the Strait of Hormuz,” Baghaei said. He called on both regional and international powers to recognize Iran’s responsible approach to the issue and engage constructively with Tehran’s efforts. Baghaei also warned that as long as the U.S. maintains its naval blockade on Iranian ports, the volatile security situation in the Strait of Hormuz will remain unchanged.

    Despite the conflicting statements from the two sides, global oil markets reacted strongly to Trump’s initial announcement, with benchmark crude prices dropping sharply in trading on Monday. As of 09:15 GMT, October-delivery North Sea Brent crude, which traded as the global benchmark contract for the first time in this session, fell 4.59% to settle at $83.89 per barrel.

    The diplomatic back-and-forth also follows a key phone call between Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Trump over escalating regional tensions, confirmed by Saudi state media over the weekend. During the conversation, the crown prince stressed that prioritizing diplomatic dialogue to de-escalate conflict is critical, and that all possible efforts should be made to reach a truce that creates space for long-term diplomatic solutions. He added that such diplomatic outcomes are essential to preserving regional security and stability, and preventing the area from being pulled into a wider, more destructive conflict. The conversation came after Saudi Arabia publicly raised concerns about Trump’s original plans for military strikes on Iran.

    The ongoing clash between the U.S.-Israel bloc and Iran, which launched in February, has already killed thousands of people and inflicted massive economic harm across the Gulf region, where repeated Iranian attacks have disrupted daily economic activity. The persistent threat of closure to the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint through which roughly 20% of global oil shipments pass, has been one of the most damaging disruptions to regional economic activity, making the permanent reopening of the waterway a top priority for all parties involved.

    In a separate update on Monday, Hassan Qashqavi, spokesperson for Iran’s parliamentary National Security Committee, noted that Tehran is close to finalizing its agreement with Oman over the Strait of Hormuz. He also confirmed that Omani mediators are currently working to revive the 2015 nuclear deal-era Memorandum of Understanding between Iran and the United States.

  • Hundreds of migrant children are stranded in Spain’s Ceuta after mass crossing

    Hundreds of migrant children are stranded in Spain’s Ceuta after mass crossing

    In the early hours of last Thursday, a massive wave of more than 60,000 migrants pushed across the border from Morocco into Spain’s North African enclave Ceuta, in one of the largest single mass crossing events in recent Mediterranean migration history. Four days later, as most adult migrants have been repatriated or voluntarily returned to Morocco, hundreds of unaccompanied migrant minors remain stranded in the territory, facing dangerous conditions and an uncertain future.

    Among them is a 17-year-old girl from Tangier, whose story lays bare the human cost of this sudden migration crisis. She, her 8-year-old younger brother, and her mother joined the thousands of people who attempted to swim around the border breakwater to reach Spanish soil, all chasing the promise of better economic and life opportunities unavailable in their home country. While the teenager successfully made it through the rough Mediterranean surf to shore, her brother drowned before he could reach land. Spanish authorities pulled his small body from the water, the girl told an Associated Press photojournalist, on condition of anonymity to protect her safety as a vulnerable minor. In the chaos of the mass crossing, she was also separated from her mother, who remains missing.

    In the four days since she arrived, the teen has survived on the kindness of local Ceuta residents, who shared food, clothing, and a chance to bathe with her. When she sought support at the government-run youth care center, she found the facility already overwhelmed and at full capacity. “I saw people stepping on the dead,” she recounted through a translator, who stepped in because she does not speak Spanish. “Now we are children begging on the street.”

    Local official data confirms she is not alone. As of Monday, roughly 860 migrant minors remained in Ceuta after the surge, making up a large share of the 3,000 to 5,000 migrants who have avoided expulsion from the original 60,000 who crossed. Official death tolls underscore the danger of the crossing: Spanish authorities have confirmed 72 fatalities, most from drowning, and Morocco’s separate count of 11 additional deaths is not included in that total. Beyond the 17-year-old’s story, AP reporters on the ground have documented other minors begging for food in the streets of Ceuta, with resources stretched far beyond capacity.

    Spanish law mandates a specific legal framework for migrant care: while adult migrants can apply for asylum, most Moroccan adults face extremely low approval rates for humanitarian protection, and those rejected face expulsion. By contrast, unaccompanied migrant minors are legally required to receive state protection and care. But on-the-ground reporting shows enforcement of this rule is inconsistent. An AP journalist witnessed Spanish soldiers escorting a crying unaccompanied Moroccan boy to the border for repatriation, only halting the process at the last minute after local residents and media protested that the child qualified for protection under Spanish law.

    Beyond the remaining Moroccan migrants, Ceuta’s remaining population of stranded migrants also includes people from across Africa and the Middle East: Sudanese fleeing civil war, Palestinians from Gaza, Afghans escaping instability, and people from multiple other sub-Saharan African nations.

    Ceuta’s primary migrant reception center, built to hold just 600 people, has been completely filled for days, leaving hundreds of migrants to sleep on public beaches and the surrounding hills. Food and clean water are already scarce among the stranded population. Local migration activist Ramsés Mohamed Azumik, with the Ceuta-based advocacy group Asociación Elín, says the current situation is no accident. “The strategy is that hunger, thirst and exhaustion forces these people to finally decide to voluntarily return to Morocco,” Azumik explained.

    For the hundreds of stranded minors, the goal of reaching mainland Spain, just across the water visible on the hazy horizon, remains out of reach for now, leaving their lives and futures hanging in the balance.

  • Inside city gripped by deadly protests in Pakistan-administered Kashmir

    Inside city gripped by deadly protests in Pakistan-administered Kashmir

    In the tense aftermath of a wave of fatal demonstrations that have paralyzed daily life across Pakistan-administered Kashmir, the British Broadcasting Corporation has made history as the first international news organization to secure entry to the restive city of Rawalakot. This unprecedented access grants a rare, unfiltered look into a region that has been largely cut off from outside scrutiny since the deadly protests erupted.

    Prior to the BBC’s entry, independent reporting from Rawalakot had been severely limited, leaving large gaps in global understanding of the scale of the unrest, the grievances driving demonstrators, and the human toll of the clashes that have shaken the city. During the on-the-ground reporting, BBC correspondents were able to hold direct conversations with local residents, protest participants, and witnesses to the violence, collecting firsthand accounts that have not been shared with the international public until now.

    The protests, which have already claimed multiple lives, have pushed the already volatile Himalayan region into a new state of emergency, with increased security deployments and widespread disruptions to transportation, commerce, and basic public services. Rawalakot, the capital of Pakistan-administered Kashmir’s Poonch district, has emerged as one of the epicenters of the unrest, making the BBC’s access a critical breakthrough for global audiences seeking accurate information about the unfolding crisis.

  • Hundreds flee fighting in northern Ethiopia as fears rise of return to civil war

    Hundreds flee fighting in northern Ethiopia as fears rise of return to civil war

    Four years after the conclusion of a devastating two-year civil war, Ethiopia’s Tigray region has been shaken by some of the most intense fighting since the 2022 peace deal, triggering a new wave of cross-border displacement and stoking international fears of a return to large-scale violence.\n\nOver the weekend, heavy confrontations broke out early Saturday in Shererina, a small strategically located community in western Tigray near the Ethiopia-Sudan border. Clashes, which featured heavy artillery fire and drone strikes according to a senior Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) source, continued through Sunday, forcing hundreds of ethnic Tigrayans to flee for safety into neighboring Sudan. Witnesses in the region reported continuous sounds of explosions, heavy small arms fire, and military aircraft operating over the area throughout Saturday, while Sudanese medical and local sources confirmed that both wounded combatants and civilian refugees have crossed the border. The full death toll from the latest outbreak of violence remains unconfirmed as of press time.\n\nThe 2020–2022 civil war between the TPLF and Ethiopia’s federal government killed hundreds of thousands of people before an African Union-mediated peace agreement brought active hostilities to a close in November 2022. However, core provisions of the peace deal have never been fully implemented, and tensions have escalated sharply in recent months after TPLF forces retook full control of Tigray region, ousting the interim administration established as part of the peace settlement. The latest fighting in Shererina adds another layer of complexity: the wider western Tigray area has been the site of long-running territorial disputes between Tigray and Ethiopia’s southern Amhara regional state, making the border locality strategically sensitive to multiple competing stakeholders.\n\nBoth sides have immediately traded blame for initiating the clashes, deepening the risk of further escalation. The TPLF-led Tigray regional administration has labeled the federal government’s actions an “open war” against the region, accusing Addis Ababa of violating the 2022 peace deal in a deliberate campaign to subjugate and divide the people of Tigray. For its part, the Ethiopian federal government has not released a full official public statement, but Minister Abraham Belay publicly confirmed the clashes had occurred in a social media post. Belay blamed the outbreak of violence on what he called the “TPLF clique,” warned that continued conflict would bring “worse consequences” for the region, and simultaneously called for diplomatic engagement, noting that all outstanding disputes must be resolved through peaceful negotiation rather than armed confrontation. \”Today, it is better to reach out for peace before destruction,\” he wrote.\n\nBeyond Ethiopia’s borders, regional observers have raised growing concerns that the renewed Tigray conflict could become entangled with the ongoing civil war in Sudan, turning the northern Ethiopia border region into a new front for a proxy conflict. Multiple diplomatic sources have reported unconfirmed accusations that rival factions in Sudan are providing military backing to opposing sides in the Tigray dispute, a development that could dramatically destabilize the entire Horn of Africa region if the current clashes expand.