分类: politics

  • Tanzania’s vice-president announces resignation in unprecedented move

    Tanzania’s vice-president announces resignation in unprecedented move

    In a groundbreaking development never before seen in post-independence Tanzania, Vice-President Emmanuel Nchimbi has announced he will step down from his position and retire from all public service by the end of next week, just 10 months after he was officially sworn into office.

    The 54-year-old leader shared details of his decision in a short letter addressed to President Samia Suluhu Hassan, which he published to his personal Instagram account over the weekend. Senior sources within both Nchimbi’s own office and the presidential administration have since verified the authenticity of the resignation, confirming the impending exit.

    Nchimbi’s departure marks the first time any sitting vice-president has resigned voluntarily since Tanzania gained full independence in 1961 and unified with Zanzibar to form the modern state in 1964. In his public letter, the outgoing vice-president framed his exit as fulfilling a prior pledge he made to President Samia: that he would leave office if she determined a different deputy would better serve the nation.

    This announcement comes amid widespread unconfirmed media reports of a growing political rift between President Samia and her deputy over the past several months, though neither party has publicly confirmed any tensions. Nchimbi rose to the vice-presidency after joining Samia’s ticket as her running mate for the 2025 presidential election held last October. He was officially sworn into office the following November, following the ruling party’s landslide election victory that claimed 98 percent of the national vote.

    That election outcome was immediately contested by Tanzania’s opposition parties, who alleged widespread electoral irregularities. The post-election unrest that followed the disputed result sparked violent protests across the country, and a subsequent official inquiry found that at least 500 people lost their lives in the crackdown on demonstrations. Opposition leaders and international human rights organizations have since accused Tanzanian security forces of carrying out a brutal, excessive crackdown on anti-government demonstrators, a claim the government has repeatedly denied.

    In his published resignation letter, Nchimbi wrote, “I have become convinced, without doubt, that the president wants changes, and I have therefore decided to fulfil my promise.” He went on to extend gratitude to President Samia and the long-ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) party for the trust they extended to him throughout his decades-long career, and thanked ordinary Tanzanian citizens for their support during his time in public office.

    Nchimbi emphasized that his exit adheres to all constitutional procedures, and noted that he will remain a law-abiding, active citizen of Tanzania following his departure from office.

    Before ascending to the vice-presidency, Nchimbi built a decades-long career in Tanzanian politics and public service. He previously served as Secretary-General of CCM, and held multiple senior cabinet positions including Minister of Information and Minister of Home Affairs. He also served as Tanzania’s ambassador to Brazil before taking on the role of ambassador to Egypt ahead of his 2025 vice-presidential run.

  • US judge rejects Ghislaine Maxwell’s ‘frivolous’ appeal against conviction

    US judge rejects Ghislaine Maxwell’s ‘frivolous’ appeal against conviction

    In a decisive ruling that closes another chapter in one of the most high-profile sex trafficking cases of recent decades, a federal judge in New York has thrown out Ghislaine Maxwell’s latest attempt to overturn her 2021 conviction on felony sex trafficking charges. The 64-year-old British socialite, who is currently two and a half years into a 20-year prison sentence for her role in recruiting and grooming underage girls for disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, had launched the appeal claiming multiple violations of her constitutional rights throughout her trial and conviction process.

    Maxwell centered her latest legal argument on a batch of Epstein-related documents released by the U.S. Department of Justice earlier in 2024, arguing that the newly unsealed records proved her wrongful conviction and supported her bid to have the guilty verdict thrown out. But Judge Loretta A. Preska, the presiding judge for the case, delivered a scathing rebuke of Maxwell’s appeal, dismissing the entire filing as lengthy, rambling, frivolous, and entirely without legal merit.

    Rather than supporting Maxwell’s claim of innocence, Preska ruled that the newly released documents actually work against the defendant, either adding further evidence of her guilt or reinforcing the validity and correctness of the 2021 jury conviction. The judge also issued a clear warning to Maxwell against pursuing any additional frivolous appeals in the future, noting that any further post-conviction motions would be viewed by the court as submitted in bad faith.

    Maxwell was first found guilty on five counts of felony sex trafficking-related offenses in December 2021, following a high-profile federal trial that captured global media attention. The conviction came more than two years after Epstein’s death in a New York jail cell in 2019, while he was awaiting trial on similar sex trafficking charges. Maxwell’s February 2024 virtual appearance before the U.S. House Oversight Committee, which was investigating matters linked to the Epstein case, did not yield any new legal leverage for her appeal, as the ruling makes clear.

  • A former Armenian president is detained in a corruption investigation

    A former Armenian president is detained in a corruption investigation

    YEREVAN, Armenia — A major upheaval has shaken Armenian politics, with former president and top opposition leader Robert Kocharyan taken into custody alongside his eldest son on Tuesday, following coordinated law enforcement raids on multiple business holdings tied to the Kocharyan family, Armenia’s Anti-Corruption Commission confirmed in an official statement.

    The 71-year-old ex-head of state, who currently leads the second-largest opposition bloc in the country’s national parliament, faces three felony charges: abuse of official power, bribery, and large-scale money laundering, according to official announcements from Armenia’s Prosecutor General’s Office. In addition to Kocharyan and his 48-year-old eldest son Sedrak, four other individuals connected to the alleged scheme are also in custody as investigators expand their probe into the reported illegal activities.

    The court-ordered raids and subsequent detentions took place less than a full day after a heated, public confrontation between incumbent Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Kocharyan’s younger son Levon during a parliamentary session. The fiery exchange drew immediate attention to escalating tensions between Pashinyan’s ruling administration and the opposition coalition led by the former president.

    Anti-corruption investigators are focusing on allegations that during Kocharyan’s presidential tenure from 1998 to 2008, valuable state-owned assets were illegally privatized and sold to connected private entities at prices far below their fair market value, draining public resources for private gain. Armenian media outlets also reported Tuesday that former President Serzh Sargsyan, Kocharyan’s successor in office, has been summoned to appear for questioning at Anti-Corruption Committee headquarters as part of the expanding investigation.

    Bagrat Mikoyan, a senior spokesperson for Kocharyan, has framed the detentions as a politically motivated attack by the current government against the former president and his family. Mikoyan also confirmed that after being taken into custody, Kocharyan reported feeling unwell and was transferred to a local hospital for medical evaluation.

    The parliamentary clash that preceded the raids centered on allegations of political interference in law enforcement. During a regular question-and-answer session, Levon Kocharyan publicly accused Pashinyan of exerting improper political pressure on Armenia’s courts and law enforcement agencies to target political opponents with fabricated investigations. In his sharp response, Pashinyan challenged the younger Kocharyan to disclose the origin of his family’s extensive accumulated wealth, insisting that any assets acquired improperly at the expense of the Armenian public must be returned to state ownership.

    Hours after the detentions, Kocharyan’s Armenia Alliance issued a scathing statement via social media, dismissing the legal case as an act of personal political revenge against the former leader. The alliance called the proceedings “another cynical manifestation of a regime that has lost its legitimacy,” adding, “This is not a legal process; this is the open subjugation of the state apparatus to political interests.”

    This is not the first time Kocharyan has faced legal jeopardy. In 2019, he went on trial on charges of ordering the illegal use of lethal force by security forces to suppress anti-government protests following the disputed 2008 presidential election. The 2008 post-election clashes left at least 10 people dead, but the charges against Kocharyan were ultimately dropped, and all legal proceedings in that case concluded in 2021.

    Alexander Iskandaryan, director of the Yerevan-based Caucasus Institute and a prominent regional political analyst, told the Associated Press that allegations of corrupt activity during Kocharyan’s time in office have circulated among critics for decades. He added that this latest case will almost certainly escalate the long-running standoff between Pashinyan’s pro-Western government, which has prioritized deepening political and economic ties with the European Union, and the pro-Russian opposition bloc that Kocharyan leads as its most influential figure.

    “Of course, this is a signal to the Kremlin,” Iskandaryan noted. “Kocharyan effectively positions himself as a Russian proxy, and we see a clear trend where the authorities have begun to fight — intensively and by all possible means — against political forces aligned with Russia within Armenia’s borders.”

    Reporting for this article was contributed by Yuras Karamanau in Tallinn, Estonia.

  • Canada to unveil response to Trump’s steep tariffs

    Canada to unveil response to Trump’s steep tariffs

    A rapidly escalating trade conflict between two long-standing North American allies entered a tense new phase this week, as Canada readies a formal response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s sweeping new 50 percent tariffs that took effect over the weekend.

    The new levies, which hit a broad swathe of Canadian exports ranging from hockey sticks to cement, went into force Saturday after last-minute trade negotiations between the two countries collapsed on Friday. Economists estimate the tariffs cover roughly $20 billion worth of goods, equal to approximately 5.5 percent of all Canadian exports bound for the United States. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has confirmed that retaliatory Canadian tariffs will enter into effect September 8, as trade analysts warn the dispute risks spiraling into a full-blown tit-for-tat escalation that would upend decades of integrated cross-border commerce.

    In a statement issued late Monday, the Canadian government said its countermeasures are designed to protect domestic workers and businesses amid this period of mounting trade uncertainty, with senior officials set to hold a public press briefing Tuesday morning to lay out the full details of Ottawa’s response. The escalation did not stop with the initial round of tariffs: On Monday, Trump added new fuel to the fire by pledging to double existing U.S. tariffs on Canadian automobiles with non-U.S. content, raising the rate from the current 25 percent to 50 percent starting in 2026.

    The proposed auto tariffs drew a fiery rebuke from Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who publicly told Trump to “kiss my ass” and floated the possibility of imposing a new surcharge on Canadian electricity exports to the United States. This is not the first time the province has taken such action: during an earlier phase of the trade dispute, Ontario implemented a temporary 25 percent surcharge on power shipments to three U.S. states. Trump quickly fired back at Ford in an online post, warning of “far worse” consequences for Canada if the province follows through on the threat, and even mocked Carney by incorrectly referring to him as Canada’s “governor” while renewing his long-running provocative call for Canada to become the 51st U.S. state.

    In a new striking display of rising cross-border animosity, Trump told reporters Tuesday that he is considering renaming Lake Ontario to “Lake America,” echoing his controversial decision last year to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.”

    Forecasting firm Oxford Economics estimates that Trump’s latest round of tariffs will push the average effective U.S. tariff rate on Canadian exports up from 5.1 percent to 6.9 percent, with the steepest increases falling on plastics, electrical machinery, and wood and paper products. The research firm added that manufacturing hubs in Quebec, New Brunswick, and Ontario will bear the brunt of the new economic costs.

    Tensions have also spilled over into cultural disputes. Over the weekend, Carney claimed that U.S. negotiators introduced last-minute demands that would restrict Canada’s ability to sign independent trade deals with third countries, and also made unacceptable “threats” to the French language and the distinct cultural identity of Quebec, Canada’s majority French-speaking province. Trump pushed back against the claim early Tuesday in a post on his Truth Social platform, writing “I would never interfere with Canadians speaking French!” and dismissing the accusation as a “lie” fabricated by a “weak and ineffective Prime Minister” to shore up domestic political support.

    The stakes of the dispute are exceptionally high: U.S. data shows the United States is Canada’s largest trading partner by a wide margin, with roughly 70 percent of all Canadian exports flowing south across the border. For the United States, Canada ranks as the second-largest goods trading partner in 2025, trailing only Mexico.

    Recent public opinion polling released Sunday by the Angus Reid Institute finds that a majority of Canadian voters back Carney’s decision to walk away from the stalled negotiations, though a significant share of respondents expressed concern about potential negative economic fallout for the country. The White House has defended the new 50 percent tariffs, saying they are a response to alleged “discriminatory treatment” of U.S. alcohol, automobile, and dairy products by Canadian trade regulators. Trump had previously delayed implementation of the levies to give negotiations time to progress, but the two sides failed to bridge their differences even after talks extended down to the final deadline.

    Beyond the immediate tariff fight, Washington and Ottawa also face a looming deadline to revise the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), the existing trilateral free trade pact for North America. Trump has already made clear he will not renew the agreement in its current form, adding another layer of uncertainty to the already fraught bilateral trade relationship.

  • Andrew Tate exaggerates and did not own supercars in photos, his lawyers say

    Andrew Tate exaggerates and did not own supercars in photos, his lawyers say

    Controversial internet influencer Andrew Tate, whose flashy, ultra-luxurious online persona made him a household name across social media platforms, has built his public image around a narrative of extreme personal wealth. But in a new court submission seeking bail for Tate and his brother Tristan, the pair’s legal representatives have revealed that the luxury yachts, high-end supercars and other symbols of vast fortune shown across the brothers’ social media channels are not actually owned by them. Instead, the legal team argues, the exaggerated lifestyle was a calculated performance to drive online engagement and revenue.

    Both Andrew, 39, and Tristan Tate, 38, who hold dual British-U.S. citizenship, are currently detained in a Miami, Florida jail following their arrest last month by U.S. Marshals. The arrest came after the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) unveiled 38 new criminal charges against the pair, including rape and sex trafficking offenses. Combined with previous accusations, the brothers now face a total of 59 charges linked to alleged offenses that occurred between July 2010 and August 2017. Both men have repeatedly and categorically denied all wrongdoing, and are currently fighting extradition to the UK, with their legal team pushing for their release on bail while the proceedings move forward.

    Prosecutors opposing bail have framed the Tates as a high flight risk. Their argument centers on the brothers’ own social media claims, which painted them as self-made billionaires with unimpeded access to hundreds of millions of dollars in cash, cryptocurrency, and high-value assets including private jets, custom superyachts worth $50 million, and a fleet of rare luxury cars. Prosecutors add that the pair retain substantial financial and social capital through their massive online following, and have demonstrated a willingness to intimidate vulnerable witnesses who have brought accusations against them. They also pointed to past social media posts from Andrew Tate in which he openly mocked prosecutors and suggested he could easily adopt a new identity to avoid capture.

    But the Tates’ legal team pushes back against this narrative in their new submission, arguing that the entire luxurious persona the brothers project online is part of their core business model. “The outrageousness of the posts by them and about them is the point. The more hyperbolic and outlandish the post, the more likely it will generate views and likes, which in turn generates income. In short, they are playing a role,” the submission reads. The team also notes that Andrew Tate often used over-the-top claims for comedic effect, never intending for audiences to take the statements as factual.

    Specifically addressing the assets prosecutors cite, the legal submission confirms that the $50 million superyacht regularly featured across Andrew Tate’s social media is not owned by the Tate brothers – they were simply paid to promote the vessel. Even the high-end luxury cars that have become synonymous with Andrew Tate’s brand, including Aston Martins and multiple Bugattis, were only rented for content creation, the submission confirms. The core of the Tates’ business, the team explains, centers on programs that teach men how to build wealth and online brands, so projecting an image of extreme wealth is integral to attracting customers and growing their audience.

    Andrew Tate first rose to public attention in 2016, when he appeared on the UK edition of the reality television show *Big Brother*. A former professional kickboxer, Tate has long described himself as a misogynist, and has amassed millions of followers across major social media platforms thanks to his unapologetic, controversial takes on gender, wealth, and success. For years, his feed has been dominated by photos and videos of him alongside luxury goods, reinforcing the narrative of vast personal wealth that prosecutors have leaned on to argue he is a flight risk.

  • Chinese artist sentenced to 3 years in prison over satirical Mao artworks

    Chinese artist sentenced to 3 years in prison over satirical Mao artworks

    BANGKOK, Associated Press – A U.S.-based Chinese contemporary artist, Gao Zhen – one half of the internationally recognized artistic collective the Gao Brothers – has been handed a three-year prison sentence by a Chinese court after being convicted of the charge of “undermining the reputation of heroes and martyrs” for creating satirical works targeting former Chinese leader Mao Zedong.

    Gao, who resides in the United States, was taken into custody by Chinese authorities in August 2024 during a trip to visit family members in China, and has remained detained throughout the legal process leading up to this verdict. According to statements provided by his wife, Zhao Yaliang, the ruling was issued by the Sanhe People’s Court located in Hebei Province, a northern region of China.

    The conviction centers on two controversial works created by Gao that Beijing’s regulatory bodies have labeled as insulting to key revolutionary figures in modern Chinese history. The first is a 2009 sculptural piece titled *Mao’s Guilt*, which depicts the founding leader of the People’s Republic of China kneeling in a pose of public repentance. The second is the *Miss Mao* series of caricatures, which portray the former leader with exaggerated feminine features including breasts and an enlarged nose.

    Shane Yi, a researcher with Chinese Human Rights Defenders who has worked to raise public awareness around Gao’s case, called the verdict an unambiguous violation of basic artistic freedom of expression. Yi confirmed that Gao’s legal team intends to file an appeal against the sentence, and highlighted a key procedural irregularity: all of the artworks cited in the conviction were created years before the 2018 law under which Gao was sentenced was enacted. The Sanhe People’s Court has not yet responded to requests for comment on the ruling from international media outlets.

    Amnesty International has joined global critics in condemning the sentence, framing it as a deliberate attempt to intimidate independent creators across China. “The extended pre-trial detention, followed by the decision to convict Gao Zhen and hand down the maximum three-year prison term permitted under this law, makes clear the authorities’ goal: to scare other artists away from engaging in any form of independent artistic expression,” said Sarah Brooks, Amnesty International’s China Director. “No artist should face criminal punishment for creating work that challenges official narratives or encourages critical reflection on history,” she added.

    For Zhao, the verdict has delivered devastating personal disappointment. The couple’s entire family immigrated to the United States years ago, and Zhao told reporters she had prepared new clothes for her husband in anticipation of his expected release, having hoped the time he already spent in pre-trial detention would be counted toward a shorter sentence. Chinese judicial guidelines commonly allow pre-trial custody to be applied as time served against a final sentence. “I told myself I could wait a maximum of two years, and now this outcome has left me deeply disappointed and heartbroken,” Zhao said. “I have not been able to catch my breath since I heard the ruling. All I want is to be reunited with my husband and return home to the United States.”

    The Gao Brothers first rose to international prominence during an era of relatively greater cultural openness in China, with their work – which often explores themes of authoritarian rule and state censorship – exhibited in both domestic and international galleries and museums. In recent years, however, the Chinese government has significantly tightened restrictions on cultural and political expression, particularly after passing the 2018 law that criminalizes any speech or creative work deemed to insult the reputation of the nation’s official revolutionary heroes and historical figures.

  • China hits out at ‘illegal’ new US sanctions on Iran and trading partners

    China hits out at ‘illegal’ new US sanctions on Iran and trading partners

    Six months into the ongoing armed conflict between the United States and Iran, Washington has launched what it calls the most aggressive financial offensive in modern history against Tehran, a move that has immediately drawn a firm pushback from Beijing, one of Iran’s key economic partners.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced the controversial new sanctions package, dubbed “Operation Economic Outcast”, during a public address on Monday. Framing the measure as an “economic D-Day” aimed at neutralizing the Iranian threat once and for all, Bessent warned that any global bank or business entity that maintains financial ties with Iran would face collective isolation alongside Tehran. He emphasized that the new measures go far beyond the already extensive U.S. sanctions regime that has been in place, noting that Treasury investigators had mapped out every hidden financial channel, intermediary and smuggling network Iran uses to evade restrictions and sell crude oil. The new package blacklists nearly 60 entities, individuals and maritime vessels linked to these operations. While Bessent declined to single out specific countries for targeted criticism, he made clear that no entity, including Chinese financial institutions, is beyond the reach of U.S. penalties. He added that President Donald Trump will imminently hold calls with global heads of state to formally request they cut all economic interactions with the Iranian government.

    The announcement comes ahead of a widely anticipated high-stakes meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping scheduled for next month. China, which remains the largest purchaser of Iranian crude oil even after trade volumes declined amid the U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports, has swiftly rejected the new measures. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian reiterated Monday that all economic cooperation between Beijing and Tehran is fully compliant with international law, and the country will not tolerate external interference in this legitimate partnership. “China firmly opposes these illegal unilateral sanctions, and will take all necessary measures to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of our entities,” Lin stated.

    U.S. policymakers are already bracing for potential retaliation from China, which controls the vast majority of global processing capacity for rare earths and other critical minerals—inputs that are indispensable for the production of a wide range of high-tech products globally. Beijing has previously used rare earth export restrictions as a leverage tool during past trade negotiations with Washington, and analysts do not rule out a similar move in response to the latest sanctions.

    Tehran has also responded with defiance to the new measures. Iranian Economy Minister Ali Madanizadeh said the country has been anticipating the expanded U.S. restrictions for months and has already put in place a comprehensive two-year contingency plan to manage the economic fallout. He called the new sanctions another doomed venture for Washington that will end in defeat for the U.S. “We are fully prepared, and we have our own tools to navigate this challenge. We have been waiting for these measures for a long time,” Madanizadeh told Iranian state television.

    The latest escalation comes as diplomatic efforts to resolve the six-month conflict have stalled, and a 60-day temporary ceasefire expired last week without any breakthrough toward a permanent peace deal. The ongoing conflict has already sent shockwaves through global energy markets: Iran effectively blocked most commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, the strategically critical chokepoint through which roughly a fifth of global oil shipments pass, while the U.S. has also implemented its own naval blockade limiting Iranian exports. These combined disruptions have driven sharp increases in global oil prices over the past six months.

    Even before the official responses from Beijing and Tehran, independent analysts have expressed widespread skepticism that the new sanctions will achieve Washington’s stated goals. David Oxley, chief climate and commodities economist at Capital Economics, told the BBC that the direct impact on Iran’s total energy revenue is likely to be far more limited than the U.S. claims. Oxley noted that roughly 90 percent of Iran’s current oil exports go to China, a country that has never recognized U.S. unilateral sanctions and has shown little willingness to back down to U.S. pressure in the past. “We suspect that the new package will have only a limited direct impact on Iranian energy flows in the short term,” Oxley said.

    Ali Vaez, deputy director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at the International Crisis Group, echoed this assessment. Vaez explained that China has long viewed U.S. unilateral sanctions as illegitimate under international law, and only complies with multilateral sanctions approved through formal international institutions. While neighboring countries including Pakistan, Turkey and Iraq are eager to maintain positive relations with Washington, Vaez noted that these nations simply cannot afford to completely sever economic ties with Iran, a key trading partner and neighbor. He added that broad economic pressure campaigns against the Iranian government have consistently failed in the past, because the regime is willing to absorb significant economic pain and shift the bulk of the hardship onto ordinary Iranian citizens.

    Beyond China, other major Iranian trade partners including India and Russia have yet to issue formal responses to the U.S. announcement as of Monday.

  • UN and Red Cross step up call for international rules on ‘killer robot’ weapons systems

    UN and Red Cross step up call for international rules on ‘killer robot’ weapons systems

    GENEVA — In a marked escalation of a years-long global campaign to curb unregulated weapons innovation, the United Nations and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) issued a renewed, high-urgency joint appeal on Tuesday for nations to enact targeted bans and restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, more commonly referred to as “killer robots.” The organizations warned that unchecked advances in the field have pushed the risks posed by these weapons to dangerous new heights.

    Three years after the two bodies first issued a formal appeal, and following decades of fragmented international negotiations on the issue, the latest statement stops short of demanding an immediate full, global ban. It acknowledges that development of these fully autonomous targeting systems is already actively underway across multiple states, while noting that no credible confirmation of their battlefield deployment has emerged to date. Even without active use, the groups argue, proactive protections for civilian populations are critical to prepare for a future where these weapons could enter active conflict.

    Reading the joint statement on behalf of U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres and ICRC President Mirjana Spoljaric, U.N. Geneva spokesperson Alessandra Vellucci emphasized that the world is now perched on the edge of an irreversible ethical threshold. “We are now dangerously close to crossing a moral red line: The autonomous targeting of humans by machines,” Vellucci said.

    “Today, we renew this call with even greater urgency,” the statement reads. “The fundamental concerns remain unchanged, but the risks have intensified.”

    The two leading international humanitarian and policy bodies point to the breakneck pace of modern weapons development as a core driver of growing risk, noting that rapid technological innovation has stretched existing international governance frameworks to their breaking point. A growing gap has opened up between the cutting-edge capabilities of new weapons systems and the outdated regulatory guardrails meant to govern their use, the statement argues.

    “Autonomous weapons systems are not part of a distant future — a race toward greater autonomy in weapons systems is already well underway,” the joint statement says.

    The renewed appeal lands ahead of a pivotal round of negotiations set to convene in Geneva this coming November, where global delegates will discuss updates to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW), the existing international agreement governing inhumane conventional weapons. The U.N. and ICRC frame the upcoming CCW conference as the most viable, accessible path forward to establish binding international legal rules that limit the development and deployment of fully autonomous weapons.

    Decades of international discussions on curbing lethal autonomous weapons have so far failed to deliver enforceable, global limits on the technology. This latest push comes amid a wave of accelerated uncrewed and autonomous weapons innovation in ongoing conflicts around the world, from Ukraine and the Middle East to Sudan, where drones and semi-autonomous systems have already transformed modern battlefield tactics.

    Notably, the appeal highlights that even the technical experts building these systems are sounding the alarm over unregulated development. “Scientists and engineers developing these systems have themselves raised the alarm,” the organizations said. “When the architects of this technology are calling for limits, states cannot afford to remain passive.”

    Closing with a clear call for immediate action, the statement argues that 2024 must mark a turning point in global efforts to rein in this risky technology before the moral red line identified by the U.N. and ICRC is permanently crossed.

  • Hungary files a criminal complaint over $965M COVID-19 ventilator deal, citing possible fraud

    Hungary files a criminal complaint over $965M COVID-19 ventilator deal, citing possible fraud

    BUDAPEST, Hungary — In a major development that reignites scrutiny of pandemic-era public procurement decisions, Hungary’s current foreign ministry has launched a criminal complaint over allegations of potential fraud connected to a 2020 $965 million ventilator purchase orchestrated by the country’s former administration, Foreign Minister Anita Orbán confirmed Tuesday.

    The controversial procurement saw the government of former Prime Minister Viktor Orbán buy roughly 17,000 ventilators from Chinese suppliers in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, between March and April 2020. Even at the time of the purchase, the deal drew sharp public criticism: observers argued the country had acquired far more units than it could ever reasonably put into clinical use, and that the per-unit price Hungary paid far outpaced what other European nations paid for identical equipment.

    In a public video posted to her official Facebook page this week, Foreign Minister Anita Orbán — who has no family relation to former Prime Minister Viktor Orbán — outlined findings from the foreign ministry’s internal probe into the procurement. The investigation, she explained, has uncovered reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, including breach of fiduciary duty that caused exceptionally large financial harm to Hungarian public funds, alongside other potential criminal offenses.

    While the foreign minister did not share specific, granular details of individual allegations, she noted that investigators reviewed tens of thousands of documents related to the deal. Critically, a portion of those records had to be recovered using specialized digital forensic tools after attempts to permanently delete them were made, she added. The findings have also opened new lines of inquiry into potential accountability for the foreign ministry’s former senior leadership, she said.

    A public statement published on the Hungarian government’s official website expanded on the suspected irregularities uncovered by the probe. The majority of the ventilators were acquired through intermediary third-party companies, the statement confirmed, and the single transaction pushed these firms’ revenues to extraordinary, exponential levels that would not have been possible otherwise.

    Beyond the suspicious procurement structure, the statement added that many of the delivered ventilators were found to be defective upon arrival. A large share of the total order was never deployed for patient care at all, and ongoing storage costs for these unused medical devices have already amounted to millions of dollars in additional public spending.

    The 2020 ventilator purchase was overseen by Péter Szijjártó, who served as Hungary’s foreign minister for nearly 12 years under the previous administration and built close diplomatic and economic ties with China during his tenure. Szijjártó also oversaw a separate pandemic-era procurement of 5 million doses of China’s Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine, alongside advancing major Chinese investments in Hungary.

    Just last month, Szijjártó resigned his elected seat in the Hungarian Parliament to accept a senior executive role at Chinese automotive giant BYD, a move that sparked widespread backlash over allegations of conflict of interest. While in office, Szijjártó facilitated hundreds of millions of dollars in government subsidies for BYD’s major manufacturing investment in Hungary. In the wake of his move to the company, the current Hungarian government has already launched a separate probe into BYD’s investments in the country that were secured during Szijjártó’s time in office.

  • Join new Iran sanctions or leave the dollar system: Bessent

    Join new Iran sanctions or leave the dollar system: Bessent

    Six months into what critics describe as an illegal U.S.-Israeli war of choice against Iran, the Trump administration has shifted gears from failed military pressure to a sweeping new economic offensive, announcing harsh new secondary sanctions that threaten any global entity continuing commercial ties with Tehran. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent laid out the details of the new campaign, branded Operation Economic Outcast, during a formal press conference on Monday, framing the initiative as an all-out effort to cut off Iran’s remaining access to hard currency.

    During the briefing, Bessent left no room for interpretation about the administration’s stance, stating: “An economic engagement of any kind with this murderous regime will expose those responsible to the full reach of American power.” The campaign, which officials have dubbed an “economic D-Day,” targets five core pillars of Iran’s remaining international economic activity: technology, gold, aviation, shipping, and digital assets. The goal of the wide-ranging action is to choke off virtually every remaining stream of foreign currency flowing into the country.
    Bessent emphasized that the era of ambiguous compliance with U.S. policy is over, noting that Washington will no longer tolerate business activity in “gray spaces.” He also confirmed that the Treasury Department plans to announce sanctions against a major global financial institution as early as next week. When pressed on whether Chinese banks that maintain commercial ties with Iran would face penalties, the secretary made clear that “no one is above the reach of U.S. sanctions.” While he declined to name specific countries set for targeting, public trade data identifies China, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates as Iran’s largest remaining trading partners.

    In response to questions about why sanctions are not being imposed immediately, Bessent explained that the administration is granting a “cure period” to allow global actors to wind down existing activity with Iran. “Why would I want to blow up the global financial system?” he said, adding that the grace period will move quickly, and any entity that fails to comply with U.S. demands risks being cut off from the U.S. dollar financial system.

    Iranian officials have pushed back hard against the new sanctions threat, dismissing the campaign as an admission of U.S. military failure. Deputy Iranian Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi took to social media to mock the announcement, writing: “Is this a victory or an admission of America’s failure!? You say Iran’s military capability has been ‘dismantled,’ 100% of its military factories ‘destroyed’ and its nuclear program ‘buried’; but for this very Iran, the ‘largest financial assault in history’ and the mobilization of ‘all US institutions and authorities’ have been necessary!”

    Despite repeated claims from President Trump that the war is “over” or nearly over, on-the-ground developments confirm Iran holds the upper hand in regional shipping dynamics. Most commercial vessels have avoided the U.S.-supported shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz, instead opting for a corridor controlled by Tehran or steering clear of the waterway entirely.

    The escalating conflict is already carrying tangible economic costs for American households, in addition to the devastating toll on Iranian civilians. Disruptions to oil shipments through the key chokepoint have pushed U.S. national average gasoline prices above $4 per gallon, roughly $1 higher than the same period one year prior. Trump has brushed off public concerns about rising fuel costs, claiming $4 per gallon is “not very high” and vowing he will “never apologize” for the economic pain triggered by his administration’s policies.

    The impact of higher fuel prices extends far beyond the gas pump, as increased transportation costs push up prices for food and consumer goods, keeping overall U.S. inflation elevated. For Iranians, the economic strain is far more severe: Iran’s national currency, the rial, has already plunged to all-time lows amid a prolonged crisis driven by years of U.S. sanctions and the ongoing war.

    Beyond the borders of Iran and the U.S., the new sanctions framework carries major risks for the global economy, as it forces all nations to choose between trading with Iran and retaining access to the U.S.-dominated global financial system. At a press briefing in Beijing on Monday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian warned that unilateral sanctions only fuel further escalation and benefit no country. “China calls on parties to act rationally and with restraint and avoid taking any measures that may further escalate tensions or deal a blow to global economic growth and financial stability,” Lin said, adding that China will take all necessary steps to protect the legitimate rights and interests of its entities.

    International policy experts have widely criticized Operation Economic Outcast, warning that the gambit carries major risks for global stability and will fail to achieve Washington’s stated goals. Ryan Costello, policy director for the National Iranian American Council, described Trump as a “geopolitical gambler doubling down on a bad hand” in Iran. “What we’ve learned is that President Trump can impose extensive economic pain on Iran, but ordinary Iranians overwhelmingly bear the cost. The ruling elite in Iran remains largely insulated, while Tehran has repeatedly refused to capitulate to Washington’s demands,” Costello noted. He added that Trump’s reckless gamble risks further undermining U.S. national security, regional stability, and the global economy.

    Sina Toossi, a senior nonresident fellow at the Center for International Policy, observed that the new campaign is as much psychological warfare as it is economic, designed to project an image of inevitable Iranian isolation and amplify economic anxiety within the country. He noted that the administration’s tough rhetoric masks a core weakness: the military campaign failed to force Iran into concessions, and cutting off all of Iran’s economic lifelines requires compliance from major powers like China that openly reject Washington’s strategy. “Washington is effectively betting it can achieve through intensified economic strangulation what six months of war could not,” Toossi said. “The capacity to hurt Iran is clear. The path from pain to capitulation or collapse is not.”

    Alan Eyre, a former State Department Iran specialist and current distinguished fellow at the Middle East Institute, argued that the new campaign actually pushes the U.S. toward becoming an economic outcast in global markets. Prominent financial commentator Peter Schiff echoed that criticism on social platform X, noting that the new sanctions are a direct response to the failure of the U.S. military campaign. “However, Operation Economic Outcast will not only fail, but the economic noose that actually tightens may end up being the one wrapped around our neck,” Schiff wrote.