分类: politics

  • US billionaire Leon Black defies summons and sues Epstein panel

    US billionaire Leon Black defies summons and sues Epstein panel

    A high-stakes conflict has erupted between billionaire investor Leon Black and a U.S. congressional committee probing the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, after Black refused to comply with a subpoena and instead launched a legal challenge against the panel’s investigative demands.

    The House Oversight Committee had ordered Black to produce confidential nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) tied to his past dealings and sit for a sworn on-camera deposition, a series of demands that Black now calls illegitimate in his federal lawsuit, filed Thursday in Washington. In his legal filing, Black argues the subpoenas are invalid and bear no legitimate connection to any legislative goal the committee is tasked with pursuing. He also claims forcing the disclosure of the sealed NDAs would harm third-party women who negotiated for strict confidentiality, have no public ties to Epstein, and have never agreed to release their privacy protections.

    This confrontation is the latest escalation of a drama that first unfolded in June, when Black walked out of a voluntary testimony session mid-interview after lawmakers began asking questions about NDAs he had allegedly signed. Committee members confirmed the walkout at the time, and the subpoenas at the center of the current lawsuit were issued in the immediate aftermath of that incident.

    Black has repeatedly and vehemently denied any wrongdoing connected to his professional and personal ties to Epstein. In his June appearance, he told the committee he had employed Epstein as a wealth management advisor over decades of their relationship, and paid Epstein a total of $158 million for what he says were legitimate financial services. He maintains he had no knowledge of Epstein’s well-documented sex trafficking activities until Epstein was formally charged in July 2019. Black’s name and interactions appear in the trove of Epstein investigative files released by the U.S. Department of Justice, though officials have stressed that inclusion in the files does not amount to an accusation of criminal conduct.

    In a statement accompanying the lawsuit Thursday, Black’s attorney Susan Estrich blasted the committee’s actions as an overreach of congressional power. “This is no longer about finding the truth about Epstein. It is about trying to destroy Mr Black,” Estrich said. “We were left with no choice but to file this lawsuit in response to an abuse of Congressional power.”

    Committee members have pushed back hard on Black’s challenge, framing his refusal to appear as open defiance of congressional authority. “By refusing to testify today, Leon Black is now defying two Congressional subpoenas,” Representative Robert Garcia, a member of the House Oversight Committee, said in a post-deadline statement. “His connections to Epstein and his unwillingness to cooperate are unacceptable. We must hold him in contempt immediately.”

    A contempt of Congress citation would allow the committee to refer the matter to the Department of Justice for potential criminal prosecution, a step that could open Black up to new legal jeopardy. Committee Chairman James Comer echoed Garcia’s criticism, noting that Black’s testimony is a key piece of the panel’s broader Epstein investigation. “It’s a shame Leon Black is hiding behind litigation rather than provide answers to the American people,” Comer said. “Mr Black’s testimony is crucial to our investigation.”

    The fight over the NDAs stems in part from a years-old legal dispute between Black and Guzel Ganieva, a former Russian model with whom Black had a six-year extramarital affair. Court records show Ganieva filed a now-dismissed lawsuit against Black that included abuse allegations, claiming Black drafted an NDA in 2015 to force her to stay silent about their relationship. Released Epstein files show that Epstein advised Black on the situation, even suggesting in an email to Black’s assistant that Black hire former law enforcement officials to confront Ganieva. Black has denied Ganieva’s accusations, calling the claims an extortion attempt, and Estrich has dismissed the allegations as “demonstrably false.” A judge ultimately dismissed Ganieva’s lawsuit, citing the NDA she signed and the roughly $9 million she received in the years after entering the confidentiality agreement.

    Black stepped down from his leadership role at Apollo Global Management, the private equity firm he co-founded, in 2021. At the time, he cited the unrelenting public attention and media scrutiny surrounding his ties to Epstein as having taken a significant toll on his health.

  • Blair Institute denies former UK PM asked PA to remove ‘Palestine’ from school textbooks

    Blair Institute denies former UK PM asked PA to remove ‘Palestine’ from school textbooks

    A high-stakes controversy has erupted over allegations tied to the Trump administration’s newly formed Gaza-focused Board of Peace, after a former senior British diplomat accused former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair of carrying an extraordinary demand to the Palestinian Authority: scrub all references to “Palestine” from official school curricula and replace the term with the Jewish historical name “Samaria”. The claim, first published as an exclusive report by independent outlet Middle East Eye, has been forcefully and repeatedly denied by Blair’s Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, which calls the allegation a baseless fabrication.

  • Xi’s Egypt visit tests Cairo’s balancing act

    Xi’s Egypt visit tests Cairo’s balancing act

    On Wednesday, Chinese President Xi Jinping concluded his first official visit to Egypt in a decade, holding high-level talks with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi in Cairo that produced a wide-ranging package of signed agreements, memoranda of understanding, and a formal joint statement guiding future bilateral cooperation.

    The landmark trip was deliberately scheduled to coincide with the 70th anniversary of formal diplomatic relations between the two nations, and it ran parallel to the joint Egyptian-Chinese “Eagles of Civilisation” air force exercise, which launched on August 22 to deepen military cooperation and interoperability between the two countries’ air services. It also came on the heels of a public report revealing that Chinese tech giant Huawei had submitted a bid to deliver more than 2,000 artificial intelligence computing chips to Egypt for a national data center project.

    Xi arrived in Cairo on Tuesday, greeted at the airport by Sisi alongside a ceremonial welcome that featured folk performances, and young Egyptian attendees waving both national flags and wearing shirts printed with Xi’s portrait. Cairo authorities temporarily shut down multiple major arterial roads to secure Xi’s itinerary, which included visits to Ittihadiya Palace and the Grand Egyptian Museum.

    At the core of the new cooperation agreements is Sisi’s formal announcement of the third expansion phase of the Egyptian-Chinese Suez Canal Economic Zone (SCZone), a flagship joint infrastructure project that already hosts roughly 200 operating companies and holds a total of $4 billion in cumulative investment. Beyond trade and industrial development, the new accords expand bilateral collaboration in renewable energy, artificial intelligence, and Egypt’s ongoing digital transformation, while reaffirming the two countries’ commitment to aligning Egypt’s national Vision 2030 development plan with China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

    Raphael Angieri, managing director and co-founder of the Sino-Arabica Project, explained the strategic logic of China’s investment in regional economic zones to Middle East Eye: “China is building these economic zones as a way of spreading the Chinese model of development.” Angieri added that the offshore zones simplify export logistics for Chinese firms, while also allowing China to bypass international sanctions and other trade barriers by expanding manufacturing capacity outside its own borders.

    The expansion of the SCZone comes at a defining economic juncture for Egypt. In 2024, Suez Canal toll revenue plummeted to less than $4 billion, down from a record high of $10.3 billion in 2023, after repeated Houthi attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea forced global carriers to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope amid the ongoing Israel-Gaza war. More recently, rising tensions that have threatened Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz have pushed a growing number of oil tankers back to the Red Sea shipping lanes, setting the stage for a potential rebound in canal traffic.

    For Egypt, these new Chinese-backed industrial clusters within the SCZone offer far greater operational efficiency that will help Cairo capitalize on projected growth in Suez Canal traffic, Angieri noted. Islam Alhalawany, principal at QFLA Advisory and a leading specialist in Asia-Middle East relations, added that Chinese investment in the SCZone integrates with existing regional trade corridors designed to bypass the Strait of Hormuz, most notably the Europe-Egypt-NEOM-GCC Corridor. This Saudi-backed mixed land-and-sea route connects European and Gulf markets without requiring transit through the Strait of Hormuz.

    In the formal joint statement released after the talks, Egypt reaffirmed its longstanding commitment to the One China principle, explicitly describing Taiwan as an “integral part of the territory of the People’s Republic of China,” voicing full support for China’s 2027 BRICS presidency, and pledging not to interfere in any of China’s internal affairs. In return, China addressed Egypt’s core priority of Nile River water rights, a sticking point in Cairo’s years-long dispute with Addis Ababa over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which Egypt argues will drastically reduce critical downstream water flows. China affirmed its “awareness of the vital importance of the Nile River for Egypt as the main lifeline” of the country.

    Alhalawany emphasized that with both Egypt and Ethiopia now holding BRICS membership, “China has a great opportunity to mediate and guarantee agreement over the Nile water.” He added that China’s potential mediation role could also extend to other long-running conflicts across the Horn of Africa region.

    On the technology front, Huawei’s public tender offer for 2,008 Ascend-series AI chips – 1,408 of which are the company’s top-tier Ascend 950-series processors – has emerged as a new test of Egypt’s delicate balancing act between Washington and Beijing. According to reporting from Bloomberg, U.S. officials are currently pressuring American tech giants including Microsoft, Nvidia, and Advanced Micro Devices Inc to submit a competing counteroffer to secure the Egyptian contract. However, despite discussions of AI cooperation featuring prominently in Wednesday’s bilateral talks, Huawei’s specific bid was never mentioned by name in any of the official government documents released after the visit.

    Bloomberg also reported that Huawei’s bid includes a partnership with Chinese tech firm iFlytek Co, a company that has appeared on the U.S. trade blacklist since 2019 over alleged involvement in the surveillance of Muslim minority groups in China’s Xinjiang region. It remains unclear what specific use cases Egyptian authorities would have for iFlytek’s technology under the proposed deal. While technical reports note that the computing performance of Huawei’s AI chips lags behind that of top products from Nvidia and other U.S. manufacturers, the acceptance of Huawei’s bid would still mark a major strategic shift in the global contest for control of AI infrastructure worldwide.

    A U.S. State Department spokesperson told Bloomberg that Egypt is “one of dozens of countries” with whom Washington is currently discussing AI cooperation. But Alhalawany argued that Egypt is unlikely to secure a viable, affordable offer from U.S. firms. “Financially stressed Egypt will likely afford the Chinese option in light of the intensifying AI catch-up race, especially that Beijing bundles digital infrastructure projects with lucrative financing packages,” he told Middle East Eye. He added that the premium pricing of U.S. AI solutions makes wealthy Gulf economies far more attractive customers for American vendors than cash-strapped Egypt.

    Even so, Bloomberg reports that U.S. officials view Egypt’s consideration of Huawei’s bid as a significant strategic development, given Egypt’s status as Africa’s second-largest economy. The omission of Huawei’s bid from all official statements after Wednesday’s talks could signal two different outcomes, analysts note: it may reflect Cairo’s reluctance to publicly align with China on sensitive AI infrastructure issues, or it may indicate that Egyptian officials are still weighing multiple competing offers, including a potential proposal from a U.S. firm.

    Angieri noted that Egypt has long prioritized maintaining its strategic flexibility, holding U.S. military support and security guarantees while also drawing significant investment and infrastructure financing from China. Alhalawany echoed this assessment, stating that “Cairo is emerging as one of a few points of convergence between Beijing and Washington.” He added that “talks are significant but in ways that do not conflict with Egypt-US relations.”

    This balancing act is not new for Cairo. Since taking office in 2014, Sisi has traveled to Beijing eight times, with his most recent visit taking place in 2024. China has already served as the primary financier for some of Egypt’s most high-profile recent projects, including the new administrative capital’s central business district and the light rail line connecting the new capital to Greater Cairo. Bilateral trade between China and Egypt reached roughly $20.8 billion in 2025, compared to total annual U.S. foreign assistance to Egypt of roughly $1.4 billion and a 2025 bilateral U.S.-Egypt trade volume of just over $12 billion.

    The joint statement also included a shared call for reform of “the international system and international financial institutions to make them fairer, more representative of developing countries.” As Alhalawany put it, “China favours change as an aspiring global power, and Egypt views that the current system is unfair to developing countries.”

    Looking forward, how Egypt navigates the competing demands of Washington and Beijing remains an open question. Cairo has not yet announced a final decision on Huawei’s AI chip bid, and no U.S. company has formally confirmed a competing offer. For now, the most concrete outcome of Xi’s visit – the expansion of the Suez Canal Economic Zone – is set to take shape along the banks of one of the world’s most critical waterways, a visible marker of China’s deepening strategic footprint in the Middle East.

  • Israel admits it assassinated senior Assad official in Syria in 2008

    Israel admits it assassinated senior Assad official in Syria in 2008

    After 16 years of official denial and behind-the-scenes speculation, Israel has for the first time publicly confirmed its role in the 2008 targeted assassination of Muhammad Suleiman, a senior military and intelligence official who served as a top aide to former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The long-awaited admission comes in a new memoir from Ehud Olmert, Israel’s prime minister at the time of the killing, marking the first high-profile, on-the-record confirmation of an operation that had only been hinted at in anonymous leaks and diplomatic accusations for decades.

    Suleiman was far more than a standard presidential aide: he held broad oversight over all of Assad’s most sensitive military and intelligence projects, and was explicitly tasked with leading construction and security efforts for a secret undeclared nuclear reactor being built by the former regime in Deir Ezzor, eastern Syria. The killing came roughly a year after Israeli warplanes destroyed the partially completed reactor in a September 2007 airstrike, an operation also carried out during Olmert’s premiership.

    New details of the covert assassination are laid out in excerpts of Olmert’s book published by Israeli news outlet Ynet. Olmert recounts that on the night of the attack, Suleiman was relaxing with guests on an oceanfront balcony at his vacation property. Under cover of complete darkness, Israeli naval commandos moved into position, splitting into two teams that advanced to within 150 meters of the balcony on opposite sides. After positively identifying Suleiman, even with crowds of civilian beachgoers nearby who never detected the operatives, the commandos received the green light to strike. Olmert writes that three bullets were fired directly at Suleiman, all striking him in the back of the head, killing him instantly. The operatives then withdrew without incident to a waiting extraction boat off the coast, disappearing before any local security forces could respond.

    While previous unofficial information had linked Israel to the attack — most notably a 2015 leak of classified documents from the U.S. National Security Agency that pointed to Israeli commando responsibility — Olmert’s book represents the first formal, public acknowledgement from a senior Israeli official. For its part, the now-defunct Assad regime consistently blamed Israel for Suleiman’s killing from the day of the attack, despite Israel’s years of official silence.

    The timing of the admission, which coincides with the collapse of Assad’s government in December 2024, aligns with a newly released United Nations report that independently confirms what Israel and Western intelligence agencies have long alleged: the Assad regime was actively developing an illicit nuclear weapons program at the Deir Ezzor site. According to the UN report, nuclear inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency conducted verification work at multiple Syrian locations in August 2024, shortly before Assad’s ouster, and confirmed the site’s purpose as a secret nuclear reactor.

    In his memoir, Olmert emphasized Suleiman’s central role in the covert nuclear project, noting that Suleiman “had a hand in everything” related to the Deir Ezzor facility. As a reward for his leadership on the project, Olmert added, Assad gifted Suleiman a brand-new Mercedes-Benz just one month before the assassination, a public gesture of gratitude for his work advancing the regime’s nuclear ambitions.

    Olmert’s political legacy is complicated: he left office in 2009 and was ultimately convicted on bribery charges in 2014, serving a six-year prison sentence before his release in 2017. The publication of his memoir has brought new attention to the covert operations of his premiership, which reshaped Middle East security dynamics long before the collapse of the Assad regime in late 2024.

  • Trump hints US would not back UK over Falkland Islands due to lack of Iran war support

    Trump hints US would not back UK over Falkland Islands due to lack of Iran war support

    A controversial new statement from former and current US President Donald Trump has sent ripples through international diplomacy, after he openly refused to guarantee American military backing for the United Kingdom if a new territorial conflict breaks out over the Falkland Islands between London and Buenos Aires.

    Speaking in a recent interview with UK broadcaster GB News, Trump tied his reluctance to what he frames as unreciprocated cooperation from the UK during the United States’ ongoing tensions with Iran. He argued that when he requested limited naval support from the then-UK prime minister Keir Starmer for operations in the Strait of Hormuz — a critical global chokepoint for oil supplies, a large share of which are imported by the UK — his request was denied on the grounds that no vessels were available for deployment.

    “It was pretty sad,” Trump told GB News. “Your country was not there to help me. We didn’t need help, but I did ask Nato, and I asked your former leader, ‘why didn’t you send a couple of ships?’ Nato was not there, even though most of those countries get a big portion of their oil from there. So we’re doing that by ourselves.”

    The Falkland Islands, a remote British overseas territory located in the South-West Atlantic, have been at the center of a bitter sovereignty dispute between the UK and Argentina for decades. The disagreement boiled over into open armed conflict in 1982, when Argentine military forces invaded the islands to stake Buenos Aires’ long-held territorial claim. A 74-day conflict followed, ending when a British task force retook the islands. The war claimed the lives of 255 British service members, three Falkland Island civilians and 649 Argentine soldiers, leaving a lasting legacy of tension between the two nations.

    This is not the first time Trump has signaled a potential break from longstanding US policy on the Falklands. Earlier, he stated that the US could revise its long-held neutral position on the islands’ sovereignty if the UK failed to meet NATO’s required target for defense spending. When questioned by the BBC recently about whether he was reviewing the US’ long-standing position on the sovereignty dispute, Trump replied: “I always review every position. That’s just one of many.”

    For decades, all previous US administrations have maintained a formal policy of recognizing the UK’s de facto administrative control over the Falklands, while declining to take an official stance on the ultimate question of sovereignty. That long-standing neutrality may now be at risk of shifting under a second Trump administration.

    The comments come as Argentine President Javier Milei is set to address the nation in a prime-time televised address on Thursday evening, where he is expected to lay out his government’s stance on what Buenos Aires calls its “historic sovereignty claim” to the islands.

    The UK government has issued a firm response to Trump’s remarks, reaffirming its long-held commitment to the self-determination of the Falkland Islanders. “Falkland islanders are British with a right to determine their own future,” a UK government spokesperson said. “The islanders have repeatedly expressed their wish to remain a British overseas territory and our commitment to them is unwavering.” That commitment was most recently validated by a 2013 referendum, where 99.8% of voting island residents opted to retain their status as a British overseas territory, with only three votes cast against the proposal.

  • Judge blocks another effort by Trump to limit birthright citizenship

    Judge blocks another effort by Trump to limit birthright citizenship

    In a fresh legal blow to the second Trump administration’s sweeping immigration restriction agenda, a federal judge has temporarily halted President Donald Trump’s latest bid to curtail birthright citizenship in the United States, marking the second time this year courts have blocked the president’s efforts after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down his initial proposal.

    Following the Supreme Court’s June ruling that rejected his first broad executive order seeking to end automatic birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants, Trump signed a scaled-back version in August that targeted two specific groups: people participating in so-called “birth tourism” and individuals labeled “alien enemies” by his administration. Birth tourism refers to the practice of foreign pregnant people traveling to the U.S. specifically to give birth, so their children receive automatic citizenship under longstanding U.S. law. While the practice is already illegal under existing federal rules, the August order sought to tighten enforcement and expand penalties for facilitators. The order also designated “alien enemies” to include members of designated terrorist organizations and transnational drug cartels, and extended citizenship denials to children of foreign government officials working in the U.S.

    On Wednesday, Judge Deborah Boardman of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland issued a preliminary injunction that immediately blocks enforcement of the order, ruling that the proposal is still almost certainly a violation of the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of automatic birthright citizenship for nearly all people born on U.S. soil. “The 2026 Executive Order is almost certainly unconstitutional,” Boardman wrote in her decision, referencing the high court’s rejection of Trump’s earlier policy. “This Court must, once again, preliminarily enjoin enforcement of the President’s most recent attempt to strip the right to citizenship from them.”

    The injunction will remain in place until a full legal resolution of the lawsuit brought by a coalition of leading immigrant advocacy organizations, including CASA and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project. The same coalition successfully challenged Trump’s first executive order earlier this year. Legal analysts widely expect the Trump administration to appeal Boardman’s ruling, a step the White House has all but confirmed through its public pushback.

    Department of Justice lawyers defending the order argued that the Supreme Court’s June ruling upholding the core right to birthright citizenship did not rule out narrow, targeted exceptions to the 14th Amendment’s guarantee. They noted that historical exceptions already exist for children of foreign diplomats and certain enemy combatants, claiming the new order fell within these allowed boundaries.

    But the White House struck a sharper tone in its response to the ruling Thursday, per CBS News, a BBC media partner. “This is just another ruling from an activist judge appointed by Biden attempting to thwart President Trump’s commonsense agenda,” a White House spokesperson said, adding that “the birthright citizenship executive order is consistent with the holdings and analysis set forth by the Supreme Court.”

    Trump’s repeated attempts to roll back birthright citizenship are a core plank of the administration’s broader, aggressive strategy to cut overall immigration to the U.S. Since returning to office, the administration has ended Temporary Protected Status for multiple countries, ramped up interior deportations, and set new records for immigration arrests along the southern border. In August alone, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection recorded nearly 51,000 arrests, the highest monthly total in modern U.S. history.

  • Sri Lankan opposition rallies against government’s proposed judicial reform

    Sri Lankan opposition rallies against government’s proposed judicial reform

    Hundreds of opposition politicians, legal professionals, labor organizers and human rights advocates marched through the streets of Sri Lanka’s capital Colombo on Thursday, rallying against a contentious constitutional amendment that would expand the nation’s highest courts and extend the mandatory retirement age for top judges. Protesters gathered at the city’s central railway station to voice their demands, waving placards and banners emblazoned with slogans including “Don’t touch the judiciary” and “Halt reforms that erode judicial independence.”

    The demonstration comes 12 days after President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s administration tabled the proposed judicial reform legislation in Sri Lanka’s Parliament, where the ruling National People’s Power (NPP) party has held an overwhelming two-thirds majority since national elections in 2024. Under the terms of the amendment, the retirement age for senior supreme and appellate court judges would be raised by two years, and additional judicial seats would be created on the country’s top courts.

    Critics across the political and civil society spectrum argue the reforms are a deliberate power grab designed to stack the judiciary with government-aligned justices and undermine judicial autonomy. Opposition lawmaker Ajith Perera condemned the proposed amendment as a “draconian” overreach that ignores the will of the Sri Lankan people. Perera claimed the government drafted the legislation without any consultation with legal professionals, sitting judges or other key stakeholders, framing it as an attempt to manipulate the judicial branch for partisan political gain.

    The NPP government has pushed back against these claims, arguing the changes are a core part of a broader effort to address chronic backlogs that have left millions of Sri Lankans waiting years for court rulings. Administration officials emphasize the reforms will not weaken judicial independence, and are targeted exclusively at improving access to justice for ordinary citizens.

    No date has yet been scheduled for parliamentary debate on the bill, which requires a two-thirds majority vote to pass. With the ruling party already controlling more than that threshold, the amendment is widely expected to advance if put to a vote.

    The current political standoff comes in the wake of a dramatic political shift in Sri Lanka. Dissanayake won a presidential election in September 2024, followed by a landslide parliamentary victory for his NPP that ousted the country’s long-dominant traditional political establishments. The 2024 election results were widely interpreted as a voter rejection of the old political order, after decades of mismanagement and corruption left Sri Lanka facing a catastrophic economic crisis in 2022 that left millions unable to access food, fuel and medicine.

    Since taking office, Dissanayake’s administration has launched a sweeping anti-corruption campaign, opening new investigations into alleged graft and mismanagement by previous governments. Dozens of former senior political and government officials are currently the subject of these probes.

  • Vance’s Antichrist comments are a ‘common belief’, his friend tells BBC

    Vance’s Antichrist comments are a ‘common belief’, his friend tells BBC

    U.S. Vice President JD Vance’s recent public reflections on Christian eschatological ideas, including the possibility that the Antichrist already lives among humanity and that the world may be entering its final days, have been framed as a widely held mainstream Christian belief by one of his close personal friends. The comments emerged during a recent interview on a Christian podcast hosted by American creator Bryce Crawford, where Vance opened up about his personal religious views as a convert to Catholicism.

    During the discussion, Vance struck a measured tone about his eschatological speculations, emphasizing that these thoughts do not dominate his daily work or personal life. “Do I think that we’re in the end times? I don’t know,” Vance told the podcast. “And I think that it’s probably bad for me spiritually to focus too much on it, because there are, like, things you gotta do. I gotta be good to my wife. I gotta be good to my kids. I have to be as good of a leader as I can for the United States of America.”

    He went on to add, “I think that there are, like, things about the world that make me feel, like, not shocked if the Antichrist was walking among us.” Reiterating his commitment to his vice-presidential duties, Vance noted that his core priority is advancing what he sees as God’s work in his current role, rather than obsessing over apocalyptic timelines.

    In Christian theology, end times theology centers on prophecies about the final period of human history before the second coming of Jesus Christ, with most mainstream denominations holding that God has a preordained divine plan for the end of the world. The Antichrist, a core figure in these eschatological frameworks, is described as a deceptive evil figure opposed to God that will emerge to seize global power during the final phase of human civilization.

    Rod Dreher, a conservative writer and close friend of Vance who was present at Vance’s 2019 confirmation into the Catholic Church, pushed back against any claims that Vance’s comments would damage his political standing in an interview with BBC’s *Today* program. Dreher argued that apocalyptic beliefs like those Vance outlined are extremely common among Christian voters, particularly the Republican base that forms Vance’s core political support. “Most Americans who are inclined to vote Republican already believe this stuff,” Dreher stated. He added that while the comments may sound outlandish to people outside of Christian faith communities, they reflect a widely shared intuition among religious believers that the world is descending into chaos amid rapid technological change like artificial intelligence development and ongoing global armed conflicts.

    Dreher also drew a parallel to former U.S. President Ronald Reagan, who made similar apocalyptic comments during his time in office without facing significant political backlash from his base, framing the remarks as a perfectly normal expression of faith for conservative American politicians.

    Vance converted to Catholicism in 2019 when he was in his mid-30s, and has previously spoken publicly about how Catholic social and family values align closely with his conservative political ideology. Since taking office as vice president, Vance has had public disagreements with both current Pope Leo and retired Pope Francis, most notably over the Trump administration’s hardline immigration policy.

    Looking ahead, Vance is scheduled to lead the White House press briefing on Thursday afternoon, marking the first on-camera press briefing from the vice president following the departure of former White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.

  • Andy Burnham praises UK-EU ties in meeting with Emmanuel Macron

    Andy Burnham praises UK-EU ties in meeting with Emmanuel Macron

    In a landmark diplomatic meeting marking new UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s first bilateral talks with an overseas leader at 10 Downing Street, French President Emmanuel Macron and Burnham gathered Thursday to hash out a sweeping range of shared priorities, from irregular migration across the English Channel to global security conflicts and deeper UK-EU cooperation.

    The meeting opened with a warm public ceremonial moment: the two leaders shook hands and posed for official photos alongside their wives, Marie-France van Heel and Brigitte Macron, outside the prime minister’s official residence before heading into closed-door discussions.

    Macron’s visit to the UK carried a dual purpose: the trip was primarily scheduled to mark the historic loan of the Bayeux Tapestry to London’s British Museum, where the French leader met with King Charles III on Wednesday a week ahead of the medieval artifact’s public opening. But the bilateral talks that followed quickly centered on what has emerged as the most pressing bilateral policy challenge of the moment: the growing use of large “mega dinghies” by people-smuggling gangs to carry irregular migrants across the Channel to the UK.

    The rise of these large vessels, first documented in early August when a 15-meter craft carried a record 230 migrants toward British shores, has sparked fresh scrutiny of border security efforts. This development comes even as overall irregular small boat arrivals to the UK dropped to a seven-year low over the 2026 summer travel season.

    To address the new threat of oversized smuggling vessels, Downing Street announced Thursday that 45 additional British police officers will be deployed to northern French beaches as part of a targeted “surge team” focused on intercepting large dinghies before they can depart. Home Office Minister Anna Turley clarified Tuesday that this reinforcement adds to an existing deployment of more than 1,000 officers already conducting active water-based interventions along the French coast. Turley told BBC Radio 4’s *Today programme* that recent footage shows officers directly targeting smuggling operations: disabling vessels by slashing their hulls, pushing craft back to shore, and operating under dangerous conditions, often facing projectile attacks from smugglers.

    Burnham framed cross-Channel smuggling as a collective European problem requiring coordinated action rather than unilateral fixes. In a social media post on X outlining the latest data on small boat arrivals, return of undocumented migrants and asylum facility usage, Burnham emphasized he is pursuing a new approach to governing rooted in international partnership. Ahead of Thursday’s talks, he welcomed Macron as a key ally, noting it was entirely fitting that the French president was his first overseas guest at Downing Street, describing France as the UK’s closest neighbor and longstanding close partner. He added that the bilateral meeting demonstrates what collaborative action can deliver, pointing to already aligned work on Ukraine, border security and efforts to strengthen overall UK-EU ties.

    Beyond the migration crisis, the two leaders also held in-depth discussions on other pressing global and bilateral issues, including the ongoing armed conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, bilateral defence cooperation and the future framework for UK-EU engagement.

    The main opposition Conservative Party has criticized the current government’s approach, however. Opposition leader Kemi Badenoch told the BBC that while she supports cross-border collaboration with France, the fundamental problem of irregular boat crossings has not been resolved. She argued that the UK has already poured hundreds of millions, potentially billions, of pounds into funding French border security operations, yet crossings continue. The meeting comes as UK politics remains deeply divided over migration policy, with the issue set to remain a central point of political debate in the coming months.

  • Sultan of Oman to make state visit to UK, balancing pressures from US and Iran

    Sultan of Oman to make state visit to UK, balancing pressures from US and Iran

    LONDON – Buckingham Palace announced Thursday that Sultan Haitham bin Tarik of Oman will undertake a three-day state visit to the United Kingdom next month, a high-profile diplomatic engagement unfolding as the strategically positioned Gulf nation navigates intensifying competing pressure from Washington and Tehran.

    King Charles III and Queen Camilla will welcome the Omani leader at Windsor Castle from October 20 to 22, though full details of the visit’s schedule and agenda have not been made public.

    For the United Kingdom, state visits are a carefully calibrated diplomatic tool: the monarchy leverages its full ceremonial grandeur to strengthen ties with long-standing partners and nurture relationships with allies navigating tricky geopolitical positions. Traditionally, these events include a ceremonial horse-drawn carriage procession through castle grounds, a formal inspection of honor guards, a lavish state dinner hosted by the British monarch, and closed-door bilateral talks with the UK’s elected senior government officials. While the monarch formally extends the invitation for these visits, planning and approval are always directed by the UK’s sitting government, with preparations typically taking months to finalize.

    The announcement of Sultan Haitham’s trip comes one month after former U.S. President Donald Trump issued an extraordinary threat to bomb Oman, after the Gulf state appeared close to reaching a bilateral agreement with Iran to coordinate commercial ship traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway, which borders Oman along its southern coast, carried roughly 20 percent of the world’s total oil and natural gas shipments before the latest escalation of conflict across the Middle East, making its security a critical priority for global energy markets.

    This is not the first meeting between King Charles and Sultan Haitham: the British monarch hosted the Oxford-educated Omani leader for a private tea at Windsor Castle during an unofficial visit to the UK last year. The last full state visit by an Omani sultan to the United Kingdom dates back to March 1982, when the late Queen Elizabeth II welcomed Sultan Haitham’s predecessor, Sultan Qaboos bin Said.