分类： politics

A high-stakes legal and political battle has erupted in Washington over the Trump administration’s interpretation of long-standing war powers law, after US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed the 60-day congressional approval deadline for US military involvement in the US-Israeli conflict with Iran has been paused amid an ongoing ceasefire.

Hegseth made the argument Thursday during a Senate questioning session, just one day ahead of the 60-day mark, which falls Friday. The clock began ticking March 2, when President Donald Trump formally notified Congress of the strikes against Iran that launched the open conflict. Under the 1973 War Powers Resolution — a law passed to rein in executive war authority after the Vietnam War — any president must end US military involvement within 60 days of formal notification unless Congress explicitly approves an extension or formally declares war.

Top Trump administration officials have pushed back against suggestions the deadline will be breached, asserting that active hostilities against Iran have already ended. A senior anonymous administration official confirmed that no exchanges of fire between US and Iranian forces have occurred since April 7, after a ceasefire took effect in early April that has since been extended. Per the administration’s position, the existing ceasefire means the 60-day clock mandated by the War Powers Resolution is either paused or stopped entirely. Hegseth doubled down on this reading during Thursday’s hearing, telling senators “We are in a ceasefire right now, which our understanding means the 60-day clock pauses or stops in a ceasefire.”

That interpretation has been rejected out of hand by Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, who led the questioning on the issue. Kaine pushed back immediately, arguing “I do not believe the statute would support that. I think the 60 days runs maybe tomorrow, and it’s going to pose a really important legal question for the administration there.”

The conflict itself began in late February, when US and Israeli forces launched wide-ranging strikes on Iran that killed the country’s supreme leader. Iran responded with coordinated attacks on Israel and US-aligned Gulf states, raising tensions across the entire Middle East. The US and Israel have justified their military action by claiming Iran is actively pursuing a nuclear weapons capability — a charge Tehran has repeatedly and forcefully denied. Even after more than a month of ceasefire, no permanent peace deal has been reached through ongoing talks, and the strategic Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical energy shipping chokepoints, remains effectively closed, sending ripples of economic disruption through global energy markets that have pushed up fuel prices for consumers around the world, including in the United States.

CBS News, the US partner of the BBC, has reported that White House and Pentagon officials are already holding active discussions with congressional members from both parties to secure formal authorization for continued military involvement. To date, every Democratic-led attempt in both the House and Senate to constrain Trump’s military action against Iran has failed, thanks to unified Republican opposition in most cases. Democratic lawmakers have vowed to continue pushing for votes and procedural actions, saying their efforts force lawmakers to put their positions on the record for constituents. While most Republican lawmakers have stood with the administration so far, some have signaled they may reconsider their stances once the 60-day deadline passes.

The debate over the War Powers Resolution deadline comes one day after Hegseth faced sharp questioning during a House hearing on the conflict, where a top Pentagon official disclosed that US military operations in Iran have already cost taxpayers $25 billion, equivalent to roughly £18.5 billion. During that House hearing, many Republican committee members reiterated their support for the administration’s campaign. Florida Congressman Carlos Gimenez argued that Iran poses an existential threat to the US, saying “When someone tells me for 47 years that they want to kill us, I think I am going to take them at their word. I support our efforts to make sure that Iran never has a nuclear weapon.”

US media have so far published conflicting reports about what options the Trump administration is currently weighing if Congress refuses to grant an extension, leaving the ultimate path forward for US military involvement in the region uncertain.

Nestled across 30,000 acres of sun-drenched central Florida, spanning three counties and four zip codes, the Villages is widely known as the world’s largest retirement community. Often nicknamed “Disney without the rollercoasters,” this meticulously landscaped, age-restricted haven for adults over 55 draws transplants from across the country with its endless recreational opportunities, vibrant social scene, and leisurely resort-style lifestyle.

Residents themselves gush about the community’s one-of-a-kind appeal. “It’s like being at a resort on a full-time basis,” says 79-year-old Betty Brock, who relocated from North Carolina. “If you get bored here, it’s not the Villages’ fault—it’s yours.” Sixty-two-year-old Terri Emery puts it even more simply: “The bottom line is, it’s kind of like utopia.” On any given day, residents can be found dancing to live cover music at one of the community’s five public squares, cruising the sprawling network of paths in colorful, customized golf carts—the neighborhood’s preferred mode of transport—or gathering for meals at local restaurants. “You move here to be young; you don’t move here to die and become old,” Emery explains.

But even this seemingly perfect retirement paradise is not immune to the deep political divides roiling the United States. Following Donald Trump’s return to the presidency last year, political tensions have simmered across the community, and the former president-turned-commander-in-chief’s upcoming rally speech this Friday, part of his midterm election push to promote his economic policies to voters, has thrown those rifts into sharp relief.

While Trump’s supporters in the Villages have scrambled to secure tickets and celebrate the presidential visit, local Democrats and Trump critics have organized counter-protests. What unites both sides, however, is a widespread unwritten agreement: discussing politics across party lines is best avoided.

“Everybody does still try to get along,” says 63-year-old Maddy Bacher, a Democrat who moved to the Villages from Connecticut. “You want to at least be able to say good morning and how are you and how’s the dog. But… I find you don’t socialize as much, and it’s kind of difficult, because everything you do move to talk about might have a political consequence.” Brock echoes that sentiment, noting that while politics occasionally comes up in casual conversation, “not as much as you think, because you don’t ever know where that line is.”

Political friction during the COVID-19 pandemic pushed divisions to a breaking point for many residents, prompting Bacher to launch a Democratic-only pickleball team. Her husband followed suit, starting a separate golf group for liberal residents after many reported feeling uncomfortable with the right-leaning views common on the community’s public greens. The Villages is home to more than 3,000 niche hobby clubs catering to every interest from female fly fishing to parrot ownership, and Bacher recalls one member quitting a local clay arts club entirely over clashing views on COVID-19 booster shots.

Long a reliable Republican stronghold that backed Trump in all three of his presidential campaigns, the Villages has seen a surge in Democratic organizing in recent years. Last month, nearly 7,000 local residents turned out for two simultaneous “No Kings” protests against Trump—a turnout that stunned even long-time liberal activists. “Nothing turns out Democrats like Trump,” says Bill Knudson, president of the Villages Democratic Club, who moved to the community with his wife four years ago. Knudson says he was “kinda stunned” at how many new members showed up to a club meeting held just weeks after Trump’s inauguration, with many going out of their way to seek out the group to get involved.

As of this week, Knudson and other Democratic organizers have been busy crafting protest signs and finalizing plans for Friday’s demonstration. Traffic gridlock and safety concerns have kept some partisans on both sides at home: the community is so large that Knudson says it would take him an hour of driving 20 miles per hour in his golf cart just to reach the rally site.

Even with the rising tensions, many cross-party friendships persist. Retired lawyer Dorothy Duncan, a Democrat who participated in the “No Kings” protest and is preparing to join this week’s demonstration, still meets regularly for coffee with staunch Trump supporter Tom Samson. The 81-year-old Pittsburgh native and retired pest control business owner says what draws him to Trump is his unfiltered style: “He doesn’t have a filter and says whatever’s on his mind, and he’s not a politician.”

Duncan and Samson’s friendly, civil cross-aisle chat is far from the norm, residents agree. Bob Carberry, who moved to the Villages 14 years ago, recalls the community was once almost entirely apolitical—until Trump entered national politics. “The emotional level of politics is something that’s emerged probably more so in the last five years with Trump,” he says.

For Trump’s backers, Friday’s rally is the most anticipated community event of the year. “He’s a man that does do what he says he’s going to do, and he may not be diplomatic, and he may not be charming, may not be politically correct, but he’s doing what every president before him has promised to do when they’re out there campaigning but have never done,” says Sharlene, a supporter who declined to share her last name. Though she will miss the speech due to work, local Republicans have organized watch parties and are discussing golf cart parades for shut-out supporters.

Seventy-nine-year-old Phil Montalvo, a retired lawyer who launched a second Republican club in the Villages three years ago to cut down on commute times for conservatives on opposite ends of the sprawling community, says nearly all local GOP members are “jazzed” for Trump’s visit. Montalvo notes that Trump’s “America First” message has resonated deeply with the Villages’ conservative majority, with Trump serving as a unifying figure for local Republicans. Citing voter registration numbers from Sumter County—one of the three counties that host the Villages—Montalvo points out that out of all registered voters, there are just 23,000 Democrats compared to 77,000 Republicans. While he acknowledges that Democratic visibility has grown, he says conservatives are not intimidated: “It’s great that they express themselves. We think they have the wrong message, but that’s their prerogative.”

Some Trump supporters are less welcoming of opposing views. Emery, who has secured a ticket to Friday’s rally, calls the anti-Trump protests “absolutely disgusting,” going so far as to label protesters communists. “The only king is the Lord. Trump is not a king. He’s our president, and if you like him or not, he’s still your president at the end of the day.” She recounts a recent story of a local Trump supporter who called police after a neighbor took down his pro-Trump flag—one of dozens of small, bitter conflicts that have become more common since 2016, when Trump was first elected.

Democratic golfer Thomas Bacher says that even casual neighborhood traditions have fallen victim to polarization. “We’d have a block party and things like that, and then… some of the people started putting up Trump flags. And that just caused a big rift. We didn’t have block parties anymore. People wouldn’t talk to each other anymore.”

Longtime resident Roy Irwin, who moved to the Villages in 2012, says the community has become a perfect microcosm of the entire country’s political divide. “I try to talk gently with everybody, no matter what their belief—respect their opinion,” he says. “It’s just like anywhere else—there’s people feeling very strongly on both sides.”

Not all residents fit neatly into one political camp, though these ideologically flexible voters are rare. Seventy-seven-year-old lawyer Edward Hannan, who describes himself as “not fixated ideologically,” says he will skip Friday’s rally mostly to avoid hours of waiting and strict security screenings. Hannan says he disagrees with Trump on many issues but admires his organizational skill, a trait he says has been lacking in many previous U.S. presidents—though he criticizes Trump’s aggressive style. “You should not denigrate people who disagree with you; you should reason with them,” he says. Hannan laments that open political dialogue has all but disappeared in the Villages, with most residents either avoiding politics entirely or only discussing it with like-minded friends. “So that’s a negative, because getting diverse ideas in a small group is difficult.” When asked if his moderate views make him an anomaly in the community, he answers immediately: “Yes.”

Home to more than 150,000 residents over the age of 55, the Villages’ growing political rifts offer a clear window into how national partisan divides are reshaping even the most insulated, leisure-focused American communities.

In the wake of a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling that weakened key protections of the federal Voting Rights Act, former President Donald Trump moved swiftly Thursday to leverage the decision for partisan gain, pushing Republican governors to redraw congressional district maps to boost his party’s electoral odds ahead of November’s midterm elections.

The high court’s Wednesday decision, which struck down Louisiana’s existing congressional map as unconstitutional, opened a legal pathway for Republican-led states to split majority-Black electoral districts to cement partisan advantage. The ruling has already upended election scheduling and sparked a nationwide rush by both major parties to rewrite district boundaries ahead of the critical congressional contests.

Louisiana’s top officials, Democratic Governor Jeff Landry and state Attorney General Liz Murrill, announced Thursday they would suspend the state’s upcoming congressional primary, originally scheduled for mid-May. The pause grants state lawmakers extra time to draft a new map designed to eliminate at least one, and potentially two, congressional seats held by Black Democrats. Trump praised the move in a post on his Truth Social platform, thanking Landry for acting quickly to “fix the Unconstitutionality” of the state’s prior map.

In a separate social media post, Trump revealed he had held a conversation with Tennessee’s Republican Governor Bill Lee, who faces growing pressure from within his party to immediately redraw the state’s congressional maps. “I had a very good conversation with Governor Bill Lee, of Tennessee, this morning, wherein he stated that he would work hard to correct the unconstitutional flaw in the Congressional Maps of the Great State of Tennessee,” Trump wrote. A spokesperson for Lee has not yet issued a public response to requests for comment on the exchange.

While conventional redistricting follows a decade-long cycle aligned with national census counts, eight states have already broken with this longstanding norm after Trump openly called on Republican officials to pursue aggressive partisan gerrymandering. Ahead of the Supreme Court ruling, five states — Texas, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, and Utah — had already adopted new maps tilted in Republicans’ favor, while Florida’s GOP-controlled legislature approved a new gerrymandered map just hours after the high court released its decision. Democrats have pursued parallel efforts in blue states: California and Virginia have already enacted new maps that favor Democratic candidates.

Before Wednesday’s ruling, the national battle over redistricting had resulted in a near partisan draw. But the Supreme Court’s decision has shifted momentum firmly toward Republicans, who can now gain a structural advantage if state legislatures act quickly before candidate filing deadlines and primary elections. Multiple Republican-led states with upcoming primaries are currently weighing immediate map changes: Alabama, Georgia, Missouri, and Tennessee are all considered potential targets. While top GOP leaders in Alabama have ruled out or downplayed changes for 2026, some Tennessee Republicans have left the door open for action. In Georgia, Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones and other state GOP officials immediately called for new maps after the ruling, though candidate qualification already closed under the existing boundaries, and early voting has begun for the state’s May primaries, meaning any changes would not take effect until the 2028 election cycle at the earliest.

U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, echoed Trump’s call in comments to CNN Thursday, urging all states with maps deemed unconstitutional to revise their boundaries before November’s midterms. “I think all states that have unconstitutional maps should look at that very carefully and I think they should do it before the midterms,” Johnson said.

Democratic leaders have not rejected the push for partisan gerrymandering in response, instead signaling they will pursue their own map changes to counter Republican gains. New York Governor Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, announced post-ruling that she would work with the state legislature to revise New York’s current redistricting process, which currently relies on an independent commission that limits the scope for partisan map-drawing. Representative Terri Sewell, an Alabama Democrat, argued at a Congressional Black Caucus press conference Wednesday that the Supreme Court’s ruling prioritizes partisan gain over anti-discrimination protections, and effectively invites both sides to pursue aggressive gerrymandering. “It values partisan politics over discrimination. It’s really, really, really — I mean, it takes us back. So to the extent it’s urging, it’s inviting red states to totally take away all of the Democratic seats and be totally red, it also encourages blue states to do exactly the same,” Sewell said.

With Republicans historically facing headwinds in midterm elections and Trump’s approval ratings remaining under water in public polling, Democrats have high hopes of retaking control of the U.S. House in November. The new push for redistricting represents a high-stakes effort by Republicans to rewrite the electoral map to lock in their majority before votes are cast.

After days of high-level diplomatic engagements and landmark moments across the United States, King Charles III’s first state visit to the nation as British monarch has drawn to a close, with two distinct final events that blended solemn respect with warm public connection.

This four-day visit marks the first time a reigning British monarch has traveled to the US on an official state visit in more than 16 years, since the late Queen Elizabeth II’s 2007 trip, creating a moment of renewed focus on the long-standing special relationship between the two nations.

To kick off the final day of the visit, the royal party traveled to Arlington National Cemetery, one of America’s most sacred sites, where they laid a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier to honor the countless service members who have sacrificed their lives in service of the United States. The quiet, respectful ceremony reflected the shared history of military cooperation and shared values that have defined transatlantic ties for generations.

Following the solemn memorial service, the royal couple shifted to a more casual, community-focused gathering: a neighborhood block party, where they mingled with local residents, community leaders, and families. The event was designed to highlight people-to-people connections between the UK and the US, moving beyond formal diplomatic meetings to showcase the everyday bonds that link the two nations.

Diplomatic observers note that this final schedule, pairing a respectful tribute to American fallen service members with an approachable public celebration, encapsulated the core goals of King Charles’ first state visit: to reinforce long-standing alliance ties, address shared global challenges from climate change to security, and reintroduce the British monarchy to the American public in a post-Queen Elizabeth II era.