分类: politics

  • Trump administration tells states to stop paying full food aid benefits

    Trump administration tells states to stop paying full food aid benefits

    The Trump administration has mandated that U.S. states cease providing full Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to low-income families, labeling such payments as ‘unauthorized.’ This directive, issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which oversees SNAP, follows a Supreme Court decision permitting the administration to withhold a portion of funding pending further legal proceedings. As a result, states are now required to distribute only 65% of the usual benefits. This development affects over 42 million Americans who depend on SNAP, commonly known as food stamps, and comes amidst the longest government shutdown in U.S. history. Previously, some states had utilized emergency funds to supplement recipient benefits, but the USDA’s recent memo insists that states immediately reverse any actions taken to issue full benefits for November 2025. The legal dispute arose after the USDA announced that SNAP benefits would be suspended in November due to funding shortages caused by the shutdown. The White House sought intervention from the Supreme Court after a lower court ruled that full benefits should be disbursed. On Friday, the Supreme Court issued an emergency order, temporarily allowing the administration to withhold $4 billion in SNAP funding. SNAP, which supports approximately one in eight Americans, costs nearly $9 billion monthly.

  • Shutdown could reduce US flights ‘to a trickle’, transport secretary warns

    Shutdown could reduce US flights ‘to a trickle’, transport secretary warns

    The ongoing US government shutdown has severely disrupted air travel for the third consecutive day, with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy warning that air traffic could dwindle to a mere trickle if the stalemate persists. According to FlightAware, approximately 1,400 flights to, from, or within the US were canceled, and 2,700 were delayed on Sunday morning. Newark, New Jersey, experienced the longest delays, averaging over two hours.

    In a glimmer of hope, US media reports indicate that lawmakers are negotiating a potential compromise to resolve the funding crisis and end the shutdown. The Senate convened for a rare weekend session on Sunday to address the issue. Duffy emphasized the escalating severity of the situation, cautioning that Thanksgiving travel plans could be jeopardized if a resolution is not reached soon.

    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced last week that it would reduce air travel capacity by up to 6% this weekend and 10% by next weekend at 40 of the nation’s busiest airports. While international flights remain unaffected, some airlines may opt to cancel them. The reduction in air traffic allowances stems from air traffic controllers, who are unpaid during the shutdown, reportedly experiencing fatigue and absenteeism.

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth offered to deploy military air traffic controllers to assist, but Duffy declined, citing their lack of certification for civilian airports. The shutdown, now in its 40th day, has left hundreds of thousands of federal workers unpaid since October 1. Low-income Americans relying on food assistance have also been impacted, with the administration agreeing to cover only half of monthly benefits.

    Republicans and Democrats continue to blame each other for the impasse. Democrats insist on including health insurance subsidies in any spending plan, while Republicans seek funding without additional conditions. President Donald Trump recently proposed sending money directly to Americans for health insurance purchases rather than to insurance companies. Republican senators are reportedly crafting a compromise package, with a potential vote on legislation expected on Sunday.

  • Summit of EU, Latin America and Caribbean nations aims to strengthen ties amid US military operation

    Summit of EU, Latin America and Caribbean nations aims to strengthen ties amid US military operation

    BOGOTA, Colombia — A pivotal two-day summit between the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) and the European Union (EU) commenced on Sunday in Colombia, aiming to bolster regional ties amidst escalating tensions over U.S. military operations targeting alleged drug-carrying vessels. However, the summit’s significance has been questioned due to the absence of several high-profile leaders, including European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Colombian officials attributed these absences to scheduling conflicts with the ongoing United Nations climate summit, emphasizing the participation of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva as key attendees. The summit, hosted in Santa Marta, is expected to focus on renewable energy, food security, financing, and technological cooperation, with the signing of the Declaration of Santa Marta as a primary objective. However, the U.S. military operations in the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific, which have resulted in over 60 fatalities since September, are likely to dominate discussions. Colombian President Gustavo Petro, a vocal critic of the operations, has condemned the deaths as “extrajudicial executions” and highlighted the involvement of Colombian citizens among the victims. The summit represents a critical opportunity for regional leaders to address the contentious issue of U.S. military deployment, particularly as the United States is not a participant in the event. Brazilian President Lula’s unexpected attendance underscores the summit’s importance, with Brazil’s Foreign Ministry noting that discussions on U.S. military actions in Venezuela and the Caribbean are inevitable. Lula has urged Latin American nations to prevent conflict in Venezuela, drawing parallels to past U.S. involvement in regional peace efforts. The summit’s outcomes remain uncertain, but it serves as a platform for frank dialogue on pressing regional and global challenges.

  • Will NYC mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani who lives in 1BHK move to ancient mansion?

    Will NYC mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani who lives in 1BHK move to ancient mansion?

    Zohran Mamdani, the newly elected mayor of New York City, may soon trade his modest one-bedroom apartment in Astoria, Queens, for the grandeur of Gracie Mansion, the city’s official mayoral residence. Currently residing in a $2,300-a-month rent-stabilized apartment, Mamdani has expressed concerns about the space’s limitations, particularly after recent plumbing issues. His current home, a 1929 low-rise building, lacks the security and amenities that come with Gracie Mansion, a 226-year-old, 11,000-square-foot estate on the Upper East Side.

  • Uganda president admits Kenyan activists were arrested and held in ‘the fridge’

    Uganda president admits Kenyan activists were arrested and held in ‘the fridge’

    Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni has publicly acknowledged the arrest of two Kenyan activists, Bob Njagi and Nicholas Oyoo, who were missing for five weeks. The activists were reportedly abducted by masked uniformed men after attending a political event in support of Ugandan opposition leader Bobi Wine. Their release was confirmed on Saturday, following weeks of denial by Ugandan authorities. Museveni, in a live interview, referred to the duo as ‘experts in riots’ and claimed they were ‘put in the fridge for some days.’ He attributed their release to pressure from ‘some Kenyan leaders.’ The activists were greeted by supporters upon their return to Nairobi, where Njagi recounted the harrowing 38-day ordeal, stating they feared for their lives. Kenya’s Foreign Minister, Musalia Mudavadi, highlighted the role of sustained diplomatic efforts in securing their freedom. Activist groups, including Vocal Africa, the Law Society of Kenya, and Amnesty International, praised the release as a step toward safeguarding human rights in the East African Community. This incident underscores ongoing concerns about the suppression of dissent in the region, with similar cases of enforced disappearances and detentions reported in recent years. Bobi Wine, Museveni’s political rival, accused the Ugandan government of targeting the activists for their association with him. The case has reignited debates about the collaboration of East African governments in curbing opposition voices.

  • Kenyan activists released from Ugandan detention after Museveni confirms arrest

    Kenyan activists released from Ugandan detention after Museveni confirms arrest

    Two Kenyan activists, Bob Njagi and Nicholas Oyoo, have been released from detention in Uganda after being held for over a month. The arrests occurred on October 1, shortly after the activists attended a rally organized by Bobi Wine, President Yoweri Museveni’s most prominent political challenger. Museveni accused the duo of collaborating with the opposition to destabilize his government ahead of the January general election. Initially, the Ugandan government denied any involvement in the arrests. However, after weeks of diplomatic negotiations led by Kenya’s Foreign Affairs Minister Musalia Mudavadi, the activists were released to the Kenyan ambassador. The pair returned to Kenya on Saturday, alleging they were detained in a military facility under “inhumane conditions” guarded by Ugandan special forces. Museveni, who has been in power since 1986 and is seeking a seventh term, warned that any attempts to protest in Uganda would “end up badly,” referencing the deadly November 2020 protests following Bobi Wine’s arrest. He also stated that Kenyan officials had requested the activists’ release or prosecution. Museveni’s critics accuse him of authoritarianism, citing his suppression of opposition voices within and outside his National Resistance Movement party.

  • The gentle but ruthless president blamed for shattering Tanzania’s aura of stability

    The gentle but ruthless president blamed for shattering Tanzania’s aura of stability

    Tanzania, once hailed as a bastion of peace and stability in Africa, is now grappling with its most severe post-election violence in decades. The crisis erupted following the 29 October election, where President Samia Suluhu Hassan secured a landslide victory with 98% of the vote. However, the triumph has been overshadowed by widespread unrest, accusations of electoral malpractice, and a death toll that remains unconfirmed. Families across the nation are mourning loved ones lost in the violence, while regional and continental organizations have issued rare rebukes against the Tanzanian government. Samia, who initially inspired optimism with her calm demeanor and promises of reform upon assuming power in 2021, now faces mounting criticism for presiding over a repressive regime. Analysts attribute the unrest to years of simmering youth discontent, stalled reforms, and the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) party’s authoritarian tendencies. The protests, led by young Tanzanians, echo global Gen Z movements against unresponsive leadership. The CCM, a post-colonial liberation party, has long dominated Tanzania’s political landscape, but its recent actions—including the disqualification of opposition candidates and a brutal crackdown on dissent—have exposed a darker side of the nation. As Samia begins her second term, her legitimacy is under scrutiny both domestically and internationally, with calls for accountability and democratic reform growing louder.

  • Why France’s ex-President Sarkozy may be released from prison after just 20 days

    Why France’s ex-President Sarkozy may be released from prison after just 20 days

    A Paris court is set to determine whether former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, 70, will be released from prison just 20 days after his incarceration. Sarkozy, who served as president from 2007 to 2012, was sentenced to five years in prison on September 25 for criminal conspiracy related to illegal campaign financing during his 2007 presidential bid. The funds were allegedly sourced from Libya under the regime of Moammar Gadhafi. This marks the first time a former French president has been sentenced to actual prison time in modern history. Sarkozy’s legal team has appealed the conviction and filed for early release, citing Article 144 of France’s criminal code, which favors release pending appeal unless the defendant poses a flight risk or threatens evidence. The court’s decision is expected later on Monday. Sarkozy maintains his innocence, claiming the charges are part of a plot orchestrated by individuals linked to the Gadhafi regime. He also highlights that the court cleared him of three other charges and failed to establish a direct link between the Libyan funds and his campaign. Meanwhile, Sarkozy faces additional legal challenges, including a separate conviction for illegal campaign financing during his 2012 reelection bid and an ongoing investigation into alleged witness tampering in the Libya case. His wife, Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, has also been implicated in the latter.

  • The ex-president’s daughter who faces terror-related charges

    The ex-president’s daughter who faces terror-related charges

    The political drama surrounding South Africa’s former president Jacob Zuma has taken a new turn as his daughter, Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla, prepares to stand trial on terrorism-related charges. The 43-year-old parliamentarian is accused of inciting violence during the deadly July 2021 protests through her social media posts. The unrest, triggered by her father’s imprisonment for contempt of court, resulted in widespread looting, arson, and over 300 deaths, causing an estimated $2.8 billion in damages. Prosecutors allege that Zuma-Sambudla played a pivotal role in fueling the chaos by sharing incendiary content on Twitter, including images of burning vehicles and calls for a province-wide shutdown. Her posts, accompanied by hashtags like #FreeJacobZuma and the Zulu word “azishe” (meaning “let it burn”), are central to the case. Zuma-Sambudla has denied the charges, with her lawyer dismissing the prosecution’s case as “weak.” During a preliminary hearing, she wore a shirt emblazoned with “Modern Day Terrorist,” a move interpreted as a jab at the accusations. The trial marks a significant moment in South Africa’s legal history, as it is the first time someone has been charged with incitement to terrorism via social media. Critics argue the case is politically motivated, targeting Zuma-Sambudla due to her father’s opposition to the ruling African National Congress (ANC). Jacob Zuma, now leader of the rival uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party, has been a polarizing figure, with his presidency marred by corruption allegations. His daughter, once a low-profile figure, has emerged as his staunchest supporter and a prominent MK member. The trial is expected to draw intense public interest, with experts questioning the prosecution’s ability to meet the high evidentiary bar required to prove intent and causation. Regardless of the outcome, the case is likely to further entrench the Zuma family’s role in South Africa’s political landscape.

  • Tunisian opposition leader Rached Ghannouchi begins hunger strike

    Tunisian opposition leader Rached Ghannouchi begins hunger strike

    Prominent Tunisian opposition figure Rached Ghannouchi, aged 84, has initiated a hunger strike in protest against what he and his supporters describe as his ‘unjust imprisonment,’ according to statements from his legal team on Saturday. Ghannouchi, the leader of the Ennahda party and a vocal critic of President Kais Saied, joins two other detained politicians—Jawhar Ben Mbarek and Issam Chebbi—who have also resorted to hunger strikes to demand their release. The trio’s actions underscore a broader crackdown on dissent in Tunisia, with much of the opposition now incarcerated and accusations that Saied is using the judiciary to consolidate his power, transforming the nation into what critics call an ‘open-air prison.’

    Ghannouchi’s hunger strike is not only a show of solidarity with Ben Mbarek, who was sentenced to 18 years in April on charges of ‘conspiracy against state security’ and ‘belonging to a terrorist group,’ but also a stand to ‘defend freedoms in the country.’ Ghannouchi himself has been detained since 2023, facing a cumulative 37-year sentence across multiple cases, including allegations of unlawful foreign funding and plotting against the state. He has refused to participate in court proceedings, asserting that judges are acting under Saied’s directives.

    Concerns over the health of the hunger strikers have escalated, with lawyers, family members, and human rights organizations warning that Ben Mbarek’s condition has deteriorated significantly. Despite these concerns, the Tunisian Prisons Authority maintains that the prisoners’ health is ‘normal and stable,’ based on medical evaluations, though it has provided no further details. Earlier this year, several opposition leaders, including Ben Mbarek and Chebbi, were handed prison sentences ranging from five to 66 years on similar charges. Human rights groups argue that these cases are politically motivated, designed to silence critics of the government.

    The situation has drawn international attention, with rights organizations condemning the alleged misuse of the judiciary to suppress dissent. As the hunger strikes continue, the plight of Tunisia’s opposition figures highlights the deepening political crisis in the country and the growing tensions between the government and its critics.