分类： politics

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — In a defiant address at its annual assembly, the International Criminal Court (ICC) declared it would resist mounting external pressures from global powers. Court President Judge Tomoko Akane asserted the institution’s independence before delegations from 125 member states, emphasizing, “We never accept any kind of pressure.”

The declaration comes amid significant challenges: nine ICC officials, including six judges and Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan, face sanctions from the Trump administration. These measures were imposed in response to investigations targeting U.S. and Israeli officials. Simultaneously, Moscow has issued warrants against court staff following the ICC’s arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin concerning Ukraine conflict allegations.

These sanctions have substantially impacted the court’s operational capacity across multiple investigations, straining resources as demand for its services grows. The current administration under President Joe Biden has not reversed these sanctions, maintaining the stance established in 2020 when Trump targeted Prosecutor Khan over probes involving Israel.

In a major development, the court has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant regarding alleged war crimes during Israel’s military operations in Gaza following Hamas’ October 2023 attacks.

The ICC, established in 2002 as the permanent global court for prosecuting severe international crimes including genocide and war crimes, operates when national jurisdictions fail to act. Notably, the United States, Israel, Russia, and China remain non-member states. The court lacks its own enforcement capabilities and depends on member cooperation to execute warrants.

Adding to these external pressures, Prosecutor Khan has temporarily stepped down pending an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct, which he denies. Assembly of States Parties President Päivi Kaukoranta acknowledged frustrations with the prolonged investigation timeline, though no completion date has been set.

The weeklong meeting will address critical operational matters, including budget approvals, against this backdrop of international pressure and internal challenges.

PARIS — A significant diplomatic push unfolded Monday as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy convened with French counterpart Emmanuel Macron at the Élysée Palace, marking the latest high-level engagement in complex negotiations toward a potential ceasefire in the protracted Ukraine conflict. This Paris meeting followed Sunday’s discussions between Ukrainian and U.S. officials in Florida, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio characterized as productive despite substantial outstanding issues.

The diplomatic efforts center on revising a U.S.-authored peace proposal that has drawn criticism from European allies for perceived excessive concessions to Russian interests. The initial 28-point framework—which would restrict Ukraine’s military capacity, bar NATO membership, and require territorial concessions—has been downplayed by U.S. President Donald Trump as merely a conceptual starting point requiring refinement.

Macron’s office stated the leaders would deliberate conditions for a “fair and lasting peace,” with the French president emerging as a key counterbalance to elements favoring Russian positions. Last week, Macron urged Western allies to provide “rock-solid” security guarantees to Ukraine, including potential deployment of a multinational “reassurance force” across land, sea, and air domains to ensure the nation’s defense.

Parallel diplomatic channels saw Kremlin confirmation that Russian President Vladimir Putin would meet Tuesday with U.S. presidential envoy Steve Witkoff, whose role faced scrutiny following reports he coached Russian officials on presenting the peace plan to Trump. Both Moscow and Washington minimized these revelations’ significance.

Meanwhile, military tensions escalated as Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov condemned Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy infrastructure, including an attack on the Caspian Pipeline Consortium terminal that forced operational halts and another targeting tankers in Turkish waters. Ukraine confirmed conducting these operations, which Peskov labeled “outrageous” due to targeting international facilities.

Russia’s Defense Ministry reported destroying 32 Ukrainian drones overnight across 11 regions and the Sea of Azov, with regional officials noting damage to residential structures in Dagestan—over 1,000 kilometers from frontline combat zones.

LONDON — British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has publicly supported his Treasury chief amid mounting opposition accusations regarding the government’s handling of pre-budget financial communications. The controversy centers on Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves’ statements preceding last week’s fiscal announcement, which opposition parties claim misrepresented the nation’s economic outlook.

Three weeks prior to unveiling her budget, Reeves indicated potential income tax increases that would have contradicted a key Labour election pledge. However, following resistance from within her own party and more favorable-than-anticipated public finance reports, the Chancellor altered course, implementing smaller revenue-generation measures instead.

Conservative and Scottish National Party politicians have formally requested the Financial Conduct Authority to examine Reeves’ pre-budget remarks and media disclosures. Their allegations suggest the Chancellor possessed advance knowledge of the Office for Budget Responsibility’s improved fiscal forecast while publicly discussing economic challenges. Reform U.K. leader Nigel Farage has additionally urged the government’s standards advisor to investigate the matter.

Reeves maintains her complete transparency, explaining that the OBR had initially projected a £16 billion ($21 billion) revenue shortfall due to downgraded productivity forecasts—a significantly smaller deficit than previously reported. The Chancellor emphasized she accurately communicated that the OBR assessment would necessitate additional public contributions.

The current administration, which achieved a decisive electoral victory in July 2024 after campaigning on a platform of no income tax increases for working citizens, has implemented £26 billion ($34 billion) in tax measures primarily to establish financial buffers against potential economic volatility.

Prime Minister Starmer, speaking at a London community center, defended these decisions by highlighting the “total crisis” in public finances and services inherited after fourteen years of Conservative governance. He framed the tax adjustments, minimum wage increases, and public service investments as necessary steps to alleviate child poverty and redirect the nation from economic decline.

The government now advances two potentially contentious initiatives: reducing Britain’s expanding welfare expenditure and pursuing closer ties with the European Union. The former risks alienating Labour constituents, while the latter may provoke pro-Brexit Conservative and Reform politicians. Starmer acknowledged that the existing EU exit agreement has “significantly hurt our economy,” asserting that closer European relations remain essential for Britain’s economic future.