分类： politics

In a nail-biting presidential election that has captured international attention, conservative candidate Nasry Asfura maintains a precarious 0.4 percentage point lead with approximately 56% of votes counted. The 67-year-old former Tegucigalpa mayor, who campaigns under the folksy slogan “Grandad, at your service,” has received a controversial last-minute endorsement from U.S. President Donald Trump.

The American president has dramatically intensified his engagement in Latin American politics, explicitly threatening to cut foreign aid to both Honduras and Argentina should his preferred candidates fail to secure victory. This interventionist approach recently proved successful in Argentina, where Trump-backed Javier Milei triumphed in mid-term elections.

Trump’s endorsement came with explicit conditions, as he declared on his Truth Social platform: “If he (Asfura) doesn’t win, the United States will not be throwing good money after bad.” The U.S. president further stunned observers by announcing his intention to pardon former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández, who is currently serving a 45-year sentence in the United States for narcotics trafficking and related charges. Hernández was previously described by U.S. authorities as central to “one of the largest and most violent drug trafficking conspiracies in the world.”

The election represents a significant rejection of the ruling leftist Libre party, whose candidate trails with less than 20% of the vote. Supporters of the incumbent party have already called for protests, raising concerns about potential civil unrest amid preemptive allegations of electoral fraud from multiple factions.

Beyond the presidential race, Hondurans are also selecting legislators and hundreds of mayors in what has been described as a fiercely polarized political environment. The outcome could significantly shift the country’s international alignment, with a conservative victory likely to strengthen U.S. influence in a nation that has recently developed closer ties with China.

The painstakingly slow vote count continues, with officials indicating final results may require several days to confirm. Political analyst Carlos Calix noted that with current data, “It is impossible to know the winner.”

The campaign notably avoided substantive discussion of Honduras’ most pressing challenges: rampant drug trafficking, extreme poverty, and systemic violence. Instead, Trump’s threats and promised pardon dominated political discourse, highlighting the growing influence of external actors in the nation’s democratic processes.

For ordinary Hondurans, the election carries profound implications. Many express hope that improved relations with the United States might ease immigration restrictions that have resulted in nearly 30,000 deportations since January, dealing a devastating blow to an economy where remittances constitute 27% of GDP. Others resent the perceived foreign interference, insisting their votes reflect domestic concerns rather than international pressure.

The White House has publicly disclosed the results of President Donald Trump’s recent preventative MRI scan, with his physician declaring the 79-year-old leader remains in “excellent overall health.” Captain Sean Barbabella, the president’s doctor and a US Navy emergency physician with combat experience in Iraq and Afghanistan, released a detailed medical memo on Monday confirming advanced imaging of both the president’s cardiovascular system and abdominal organs returned “perfectly normal” results.

The comprehensive examination, conducted during Trump’s October physical at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, was characterized as standard preventive care for men in his age demographic. According to the medical assessment, there is no evidence of arterial narrowing that would impair blood flow, nor any abnormalities detected in the president’s heart or major vessels. The abdominal imaging similarly revealed all evaluated organs “functioning within normal limits with no acute or chronic concerns.”

This transparency initiative comes amid increasing scrutiny from Democratic officials, including Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, who have expressed concerns about the president’s age and physical capacity during his second term. The disclosure follows Trump’s Sunday comments aboard Air Force One, where he expressed willingness to release the results while humorously noting the scan didn’t examine his brain since he had “aced” a recent cognitive test.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt presented the findings during Monday’s press briefing, emphasizing the administration’s commitment to transparency. The release addresses ongoing public discussion about Trump’s health, which has included observations of swollen ankles, bruising on his right hand, and instances of the president dozing during meetings. Previous medical disclosures revealed a diagnosis of chronic venous insufficiency, a vein condition that can cause leg swelling.

The timing of the medical disclosure follows Trump’s recent harsh criticism of a New York Times reporter who co-authored an article examining his age and physical stamina, highlighting the politically charged nature of presidential health discussions.

The White House has issued a robust defense of U.S. military operations targeting suspected Venezuelan narcotics vessels in the Caribbean, affirming that a senior Navy commander acted within legal parameters when authorizing lethal strikes. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Monday that Admiral Frank Bradley operated “well within his authority and the law” in ordering additional military action against an alleged drug-smuggling boat.

The administration forcefully denied allegations reported by the Washington Post that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had issued verbal commands to “kill everybody” aboard targeted vessels. Both Hegseth and White House officials characterized these claims as “fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory,” with President Trump expressing complete confidence in his defense secretary.

This military campaign, framed as a counter-narcotics initiative, has resulted in over 80 fatalities since early September. The Trump administration characterizes these operations as acts of self-defense against presidentially designated narco-terrorist groups transporting illicit drugs toward American shores.

The strikes have triggered bipartisan concern in Congress, with both the Senate and House Armed Services Committees initiating inquiries into the operational circumstances. Senators Roger Wicker and Jack Reed announced vigorous oversight measures to establish factual clarity regarding engagement protocols.

Internationally, Venezuela’s National Assembly has condemned the military actions and pledged thorough investigation into allegations of secondary strikes that reportedly killed survivors. The Venezuelan government accuses the United States of deliberately escalating regional tensions to undermine its sovereignty.

The legal framework governing these operations remains contentious, with the administration classifying the campaign as a non-international armed conflict against drug traffickers. This classification invokes Geneva Convention provisions prohibiting targeting of wounded participants and mandating their apprehension and medical care.

The current controversy echoes previous scrutiny of U.S. engagement protocols during the Obama administration, particularly regarding drone strike practices that sometimes resulted in unintended casualties.