分类: politics

  • US judge orders Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s release from ICE custody

    US judge orders Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s release from ICE custody

    In a significant judicial ruling, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis has mandated the immediate release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from immigration detention, declaring his continued confinement without legal authority. The decision marks a dramatic development in a case involving mistaken deportation and subsequent repatriation.

    Mr. Abrego Garcia was initially deported to El Salvador in March and incarcerated in CECOT prison under the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement operations. The U.S. government subsequently acknowledged this deportation as erroneous and returned him to the United States to face human smuggling charges in Tennessee, where he has remained detained pending trial.

    Judge Xinis’s ruling emphatically stated that since Abrego Garcia’s return from wrongful detention in El Salvador, he has been ‘re-detained, again without lawful authority.’ The court found that the government lacks a valid removal order, thereby preventing any potential deportation proceedings at this time.

    The case intersects with broader immigration policy controversies, as the Trump administration contends Abrego Garcia maintains affiliations with the MS-13 criminal organization—an allegation he consistently denies. This spring, administration officials transported numerous migrants accused of gang affiliations to Salvadoran prisons, despite existing court orders specifically prohibiting Abrego Garcia’s transfer to El Salvador.

    While separate criminal proceedings regarding human smuggling charges continue in Tennessee—where Abrego Garcia has pleaded not guilty—Judge Xinis determined that his immigration detention lacked legal justification. The federal court in Maryland handling his deportation challenge has ordered his release under conditions set by the Tennessee court overseeing his criminal case.

  • Ukraine hands US revised peace plan proposal, Germany says

    Ukraine hands US revised peace plan proposal, Germany says

    German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has confirmed that European leaders have submitted a comprehensive peace plan for Ukraine to U.S. President Donald Trump, containing potential territorial concessions that Kyiv might consider. Merz emphasized that ultimate decisions regarding territory “must be answered primarily by the Ukrainian president, and the Ukrainian people,” a position explicitly communicated to the American administration.

    The diplomatic initiative comes after weeks of intensive coordination between European capitals and Kyiv to develop a negotiated framework addressing Ukraine’s security interests. Concerns persist among European allies regarding Trump’s potential alignment with Russian objectives, given his administration’s previous engagement with Moscow. Chancellor Merz cautioned against imposing an unsustainable peace, stating it “would be a mistake to force the Ukrainian president into a peace that his people will not accept after four years of suffering and death.”

    During a Wednesday phone conversation described as constructive, Merz, alongside French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, asserted that European interests must be integral to any settlement. President Trump acknowledged discussing Ukraine “in pretty strong words” but remained noncommittal about attending proposed European negotiations, noting “we don’t want to be wasting time.”

    The territorial status of occupied eastern regions represents a critical obstacle. Russia demands complete Ukrainian withdrawal from contested areas in Luhansk and Donetsk—a condition Kyiv rejects both constitutionally and morally. President Volodymyr Zelensky has consistently stated Ukraine lacks “legal right or moral right” to cede territory under national and international law.

    As Zelensky convenes further talks with the coalition of allied leaders, Moscow maintains strategic silence while promoting narratives of Russo-American alignment. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov praised Trump’s diplomatic efforts, claiming recent Kremlin meetings with U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff resolved misunderstandings stemming from last summer’s Alaska summit. Lavrov reiterated Moscow’s opposition to international security guarantees for Ukraine, instead proposing Russian legal assurances against attacking NATO or EU nations—offers met with skepticism given historical violations of previous agreements.

    With Ukraine’s electoral status suspended under martial law, Zelensky has conditioned elections on security guarantees from Western partners. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte concurrently warned of insufficient alliance preparedness, emphasizing that “Russia’s next target” requires urgent preventive measures to avoid continental conflict on a historical scale.

  • The US threatens to cut aid to South Sudan, citing its treatment of humanitarian groups

    The US threatens to cut aid to South Sudan, citing its treatment of humanitarian groups

    The United States has issued a stern warning to South Sudan’s government, indicating potential significant reductions in foreign assistance due to alleged obstruction of humanitarian operations. In an official statement released Thursday by the State Department’s Bureau for African Affairs, American officials accused Juba of imposing prohibitive fees on aid organizations and creating operational barriers that violate international obligations.

    Washington revealed it has channeled over $9.5 billion in assistance to South Sudan since the nation gained independence in 2011. This substantial support contrasts sharply with the approximately $25 billion in oil revenues collected by the South Sudanese government, which has reportedly failed to translate into meaningful public service development.

    The humanitarian situation remains critical, with United Nations data indicating more than 70% of South Sudan’s 11 million citizens depend on external aid for basic survival needs including food and healthcare. The U.S. statement attributed this crisis directly to systemic governance failures, misappropriation of public funds, security instability fostered by national leadership, and what it termed ‘predatory rent-seeking’ behavior targeting humanitarian resources.

    This diplomatic confrontation marks the latest strain in bilateral relations between the two nations. Earlier this year, the U.S. suspended visa issuances to South Sudanese citizens following a deportation-related diplomatic dispute. The South Sudanese government had not issued an immediate response to the latest allegations at the time of reporting.

  • Bulgarian PM and government resign after mass protests

    Bulgarian PM and government resign after mass protests

    Bulgaria’s political landscape underwent a seismic shift as Prime Minister Rosen Zhelyazkov announced the resignation of his minority government following massive nationwide demonstrations against alleged corruption. The dramatic decision came just hours before a scheduled parliamentary no-confidence vote and mere weeks before Bulgaria’s planned adoption of the euro currency on January 1st.

    Central Sofia witnessed an extraordinary display of public discontent as between 50,000 to 100,000 protesters flooded the Triangle of Power and Independence Square on Wednesday evening. The parliament building itself became a canvas for dissent with projections reading ‘Resignation’ and ‘Mafia Out’ illuminating its facade. These demonstrations, organized under the banner ‘Resignation! Peevski and Borissov Out of Power,’ targeted two controversial political figures: oligarch Delyan Peevski, who faces international sanctions for alleged corruption, and former Prime Minister Boyko Borissov.

    The government’s collapse marks the culmination of months of political tension. Despite surviving five previous no-confidence votes since taking power in January, Zhelyazkov’s administration could not withstand the growing public outrage. Last week, the government had already withdrawn a controversial budget proposal in response to initial protests, but this concession failed to quell the movement.

    In a televised address, Zhelyazkov acknowledged the public’s demands: ‘We hear the voice of citizens protesting against the government. Both young and old have raised their voices for our resignation. This civic energy must be supported and encouraged.’ The government website confirmed ministers would maintain their positions temporarily until a new cabinet forms.

    The political turmoil occurs against the backdrop of Bulgaria’s persistently low ranking on Transparency International’s corruption index, where it trails behind most European nations. Despite the governmental crisis, financial analysts suggest Bulgaria’s transition to the eurozone remains on track, with the central bank confirming the changeover schedule remains unaffected.

    President Rumen Radev, who had previously endorsed the protesters’ demands, now faces the challenge of facilitating a smooth political transition during this critical period for the Balkan nation.

  • EU pushes Ukraine membership bid forward despite Hungary’s objections

    EU pushes Ukraine membership bid forward despite Hungary’s objections

    In a significant move demonstrating continued support for Ukraine, the European Union presented Kyiv with a comprehensive reform roadmap during high-level talks in Lviv on Thursday. This development comes despite Hungary’s persistent objections to advancing Ukraine’s membership aspirations during ongoing hostilities.

    EU diplomats and officials, meeting in western Ukraine, established detailed requirements covering approximately half of the necessary reform clusters needed for accession. This approach allows substantive progress while formal negotiations remain stalled due to Budapest’s opposition. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán maintains that accession talks should not proceed during wartime, citing concerns about Ukraine’s Hungarian minority and potential economic risks. Hungary notably abstained from sending representation to the Lviv meeting.

    Denmark’s European Affairs Minister Marie Bjerre emphasized the broader EU consensus, stating, ‘Twenty-six member countries envision Ukraine’s future within the EU. The question is not if, but when this will happen.’

    Cyprus, which joined the EU in 2004 as a divided nation, emerges as a potential model for Ukraine’s accession path. As Cyprus prepares to assume the EU’s rotating presidency in January, its officials have pledged to maintain momentum on Ukraine’s bid. Cypriot Deputy Minister for European Affairs Marilena Raouna commended Kyiv’s ‘extraordinary political will’ to implement crucial reforms despite Russia’s ongoing aggression.

    Ukraine’s reform requirements are organized into six comprehensive clusters, with Thursday’s agreement covering three critical areas: rule of law and democratic institutions, internal market regulations, and external relations. Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Taras Kachka acknowledged that recent corruption scandals have elevated judicial and anti-corruption reforms as immediate priorities, noting that implementation pace now rests primarily with Kyiv.

    Should Ukraine eventually join the EU, it would become the bloc’s largest member by land area, surpassing France. Its accession would significantly enhance the union’s agricultural capacity, energy security, and geopolitical influence while countering Russian dominance in the region. EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos affirmed that providing Kyiv with a clear roadmap would accelerate transformative changes, asserting that ‘nobody can veto Ukraine from implementing these reforms’ or ultimately block its membership.

  • Kenyan court suspends ‘landmark’ US health aid deal over data privacy concerns

    Kenyan court suspends ‘landmark’ US health aid deal over data privacy concerns

    A Kenyan high court has issued an interim injunction suspending the implementation of a major $2.5 billion health assistance agreement between Kenya and the United States, citing serious data privacy concerns. The ruling comes in response to a legal challenge filed by consumer rights advocates who argue the pact could enable unauthorized transfer of sensitive medical information.

    The court’s decision specifically prohibits Kenyan authorities from taking any action to implement the agreement insofar as it facilitates “the transfer, sharing or dissemination of medical, epidemiological or sensitive personal health data.” This suspension will remain in effect until the case receives full judicial review, scheduled for February 12.

    The health agreement, hailed as “landmark” by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio during last week’s signing ceremony, represents a significant shift in American foreign aid strategy. The Trump administration has been pursuing direct government-to-government health partnerships across Africa, moving away from traditional aid agency channels. Under this new approach, recipient countries must increase their own health spending commitments. In the Kenya arrangement, the US pledged $1.7 billion while Kenya committed $850 million with plans to gradually assume greater financial responsibility.

    Despite government assurances, many Kenyans have expressed apprehension that the deal could grant US authorities access to highly personal medical records, including HIV status, tuberculosis treatment history, and vaccination data. The Consumer Federation of Kenya (Cofek), one of the petitioners, warned that external control over pharmaceuticals for emerging diseases and digital health infrastructure—including cloud storage of raw data—could compromise Kenya’s strategic control of its health systems.

    President William Ruto attempted to reassure citizens, stating that the attorney-general had meticulously reviewed the agreement to ensure Kenyan data protection laws would prevail. The US government has not publicly addressed the data privacy concerns raised by the court case. Similar health agreements have been signed with Rwanda, Lesotho, Liberia, and Uganda as part of the US global health strategy overhaul.

  • Bangladesh to hold national elections in February, the first since 2024 mass uprising

    Bangladesh to hold national elections in February, the first since 2024 mass uprising

    Bangladesh’s Chief Election Commissioner A.M.M. Nasir Uddin announced Thursday that the nation’s next general elections will take place on February 12, marking a pivotal moment in the country’s political landscape eighteen months after the ousting of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. The electoral timetable was formally disclosed during a nationally televised address, revealing that citizens will simultaneously participate in a referendum concerning proposed political reforms while electing 300 parliamentary representatives.

    The electoral process will commence with nomination filings from December 12-29, followed by a six-day review period. January 20 has been designated as the final date for candidate withdrawals. This election represents the thirteenth national vote since Bangladesh achieved independence from Pakistan in 1971 following a bloody liberation war.

    The political environment remains deeply fractured since the massive protests of July-August 2024 that precipitated Hasina’s removal from power. The former leader, now residing in exile in India, received a death sentence in November from a Bangladeshi court for crimes against humanity related to the unrest. Since August 8, 2024, an interim government led by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus has governed the nation, implementing a ban on all activities of Hasina’s Awami League party that effectively excludes the former ruling party from electoral participation.

    Reactions to the election announcement have revealed stark political divisions. The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), along with Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami and the newly formed National Citizen Party, welcomed the electoral timeline. BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir characterized the announcement as ‘a day of joy,’ expressing confidence that the election commission and government were committed to implementing the people’s democratic rights.

    Conversely, Hasina’s Awami League condemned the election as illegitimate, asserting that excluding the party that led Bangladesh’s independence movement would plunge the nation into profound crisis. The interim government under Yunus congratulated the election commission, describing the upcoming vote as consolidating Bangladesh’s ‘new trajectory’ following last year’s historic uprising.

    International human rights organizations have raised concerns about Bangladesh’s democratic transition, with Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International questioning the rule of law under the interim government and the fairness of Hasina’s trial. The nation remains polarized as it attempts to break from the dominance of two dynastic political camps—Hasina’s Awami League and the BNP led by ailing former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia—while addressing concerns about rising Islamist influence.

    The concurrent referendum addresses demands by political parties to legitimize the ‘July National Charter’ of political reforms, which currently lacks binding legal status. In Bangladesh’s parliamentary democracy of 170 million people, only parliament can amend the constitution, making the referendum’s outcome potentially significant for the country’s governance framework. Over 127.6 million registered voters are eligible to participate in both the electoral and referendum processes.

  • Former Bolivian President Luis Arce arrested in corruption probe

    Former Bolivian President Luis Arce arrested in corruption probe

    In a significant political development, former Bolivian President Luis Arce has been taken into custody by authorities in La Paz as part of an ongoing corruption investigation. The 62-year-old leader, who completed his presidential term last month, faces allegations related to his previous tenure as economy minister during Evo Morales’ administration (2006-2019).

    The arrest warrant issued by Bolivia’s Interior Ministry specifies charges of “breach of duty and uneconomical conduct,” centering on accusations that Arce authorized illicit transfers of public funds to personal accounts of political figures. The investigation connects to a long-running probe into the Indigenous Peoples Development Fund (Fondioc), where millions intended for community projects were allegedly diverted to non-existent or abandoned initiatives.

    Attorney General Roger Mariaca confirmed that Arce exercised his right to remain silent during police interrogation. The former president will remain in custody overnight before undergoing judicial proceedings to determine whether he will be detained pending trial. Mariaca explicitly denied allegations of political motivation behind the arrest.

    The case has drawn strong reactions from both sides of Bolivia’s political divide. María Nela Prada, Arce’s former colleague, denounced the detention as “a total abuse of power” and maintained his innocence. Conversely, current Vice-President Edmand Lara characterized the arrest as part of a broader anti-corruption initiative, declaring that “all those who have stolen from this country will return every last cent and will be held accountable before the law.”

    This development occurs within weeks of centrist candidate Rodrigo Paz’s electoral victory in October, which concluded nearly twenty years of dominance by the leftist MAS party that Arce represented. President Paz, upon assuming office last month, announced the discovery of extensive corruption within previous leftist governments. The new administration has already arrested six former executives of state oil company YPFB on similar charges, signaling a robust anti-graft campaign.

    Under Bolivian law, outgoing executive branch members are prohibited from leaving the country for 90 days following a government transition, facilitating the current investigation into Arce’s activities during his ministerial service.

  • Pakistan’s military sentences its former spy chief to 14 years in jail

    Pakistan’s military sentences its former spy chief to 14 years in jail

    In an unprecedented judicial development within Pakistan’s military establishment, former Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) director Faiz Hameed has been sentenced to 14 years imprisonment by a military tribunal. The verdict concludes a 15-month legal process that marks the first court martial of an ISI chief in the nation’s history.

    The military court convicted Hameed on multiple serious charges including violation of state secrets under the Official Secrets Act, unauthorized political interference, misuse of authority and government resources, and actions detrimental to citizens’ welfare. The proceedings, conducted behind closed doors beginning August 12, 2024, were administered under the Pakistan Army Act.

    Hameed, who helmed the country’s premier intelligence agency from 2019 to 2021 during former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s administration, was widely recognized as a steadfast Khan loyalist. He opted for early retirement shortly after Khan’s removal through a parliamentary no-confidence motion in 2022.

    The military’s public relations division (ISPR) confirmed in an official communiqué that the defendant was afforded legal representation of his choice throughout the judicial process. The statement further clarified that Hameed retains the right to challenge the verdict through an appeal to Pakistan’s Supreme Court.

    Separately, investigations continue regarding Hameed’s alleged involvement in instigating political unrest, particularly concerning protests triggered by Imran Khan’s arrest on May 9, 2023. This aspect of the case remains under exclusive military jurisdiction and will be addressed through subsequent legal channels.

    The sentencing of someone who held what is considered Pakistan’s second-most powerful military position signals significant institutional repercussions within the country’s political-military framework.

  • Ghana deports Israelis in retaliation for alleged mistreatment of Ghanaians

    Ghana deports Israelis in retaliation for alleged mistreatment of Ghanaians

    Ghana has executed a decisive diplomatic response by deporting three Israeli citizens from Kotoka International Airport in Accra, following alleged mistreatment of Ghanaian nationals at Israel’s Ben Gurion International Airport. The move appears to be a direct reciprocal action in a growing bilateral dispute.

    The tension escalated after seven Ghanaian citizens, including four official delegates attending a cybersecurity conference in Tel Aviv, were reportedly detained without explanation by Israeli authorities. According to Ghanaian officials, four members of the delegation were released after five hours of detention, while three other Ghanaian travelers faced deportation.

    Ghana’s Foreign Ministry strongly condemned what it described as “humiliating treatment” of its citizens, summoning a senior Israeli diplomat in Accra to address the incident. Both nations have subsequently agreed to pursue amicable resolution measures despite the current strains.

    In an official statement, the Ghanaian government expressed concern that Israeli authorities were “unfairly targeting Ghanaian travellers” and emphasized expectations that Ghanaian citizens “be treated with dignity and respect in much the same way as other governments expect Ghana to treat their nationals.”

    The diplomatic friction may be connected to Ghana’s recent foreign policy positions regarding the Israel-Palestinian conflict. In September, Ghana condemned Israeli airstrikes near Qatar as “clear violation of international law,” and previously urged Israel to facilitate increased humanitarian aid to Gaza. President John Mahama further demonstrated solidarity by donating 40 tonnes of Ghanaian chocolate and cocoa products to Palestinians.

    Analysts suggest these actions may have contributed to current tensions, particularly if perceived by Israel as demonstrating bias. However, Ghana maintains that its embassy in Tel Aviv remains “responsive and compliant with international law,” countering Israeli claims of non-cooperation regarding deportation procedures.

    Despite the current dispute, both nations acknowledge decades of generally friendly relations, making the recent incidents particularly notable within their diplomatic history.