分类: politics

  • ‘We are crazy radicals’: Israel’s anti-war protesters struggle against ruling consensus

    ‘We are crazy radicals’: Israel’s anti-war protesters struggle against ruling consensus

    A small but determined anti-war movement is beginning to surface in Israel as the military conflict with Iran enters its third week, presenting a stark contrast to the overwhelming national consensus supporting the campaign. Despite facing widespread public opposition and official scrutiny, dissenting voices are organizing modest demonstrations in major cities including Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

    Recent protests, typically numbering fewer than one hundred participants, have featured activists wearing orange jumpsuits and masks depicting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while chanting anti-war slogans. These demonstrations have drawn criticism from passersby and faced rapid dispersal by police authorities, with several activists reportedly arrested in Haifa and Tel Aviv.

    The dissent emerges against a backdrop of significant human cost. Israeli casualties currently stand at fifteen fatalities, including nine victims of a direct strike on Beit Shemesh, while Iranian and Lebanese casualties number in the thousands with millions displaced across the region.

    According to recent polling data from the Israel Democracy Institute, 92.5% of Israeli citizens support Operation Roaring Lion, the codename for the current military campaign. Support among Palestinian citizens of Israel is significantly lower, with 65% expressing opposition.

    A coalition of eighty Jewish and Arab organizations recently delivered an open letter to both Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump, criticizing the operation as pursuing “unattainable goals” while lacking “a clear exit strategy.” The letter was coordinated by It’s Time, a peacebuilding coalition whose creative director Mika Almog (granddaughter of former Prime Minister Shimon Peres) argues the conflict has created severe domestic consequences including school closures, economic disruption, and constant danger for Israeli children.

    Almog traces regional instability to the unresolved Israeli-Palestinian conflict, noting that seven million Palestinians “living under occupation” without future prospects creates inevitable deterioration. She emphasizes that since the 1995 assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, peace negotiations have not been presented to the public as realistic options.

    Political opposition has largely reinforced rather than challenged the government’s position. Main rival Naftali Bennett expressed full support for military leadership, while opposition leader Yair Lapid advocated for destructive strikes on Iran’s oil infrastructure. Mainstream media has predominantly echoed establishment views, with Haaretz columnist Gideon Levy noting that “raising doubts about the war is not legitimate” in current discourse.

    Despite the challenging environment, protesters like 23-year-old Orthodox Jew Lawrence Shenkin maintain that “war is a temporary measure with temporary solutions” until genuine peace is achieved. Analysts suggest that if the conflict extends for months, criticism may gain broader traction as domestic costs increase.

  • Turkey tightens military-transit rules to stop illicit arms trade

    Turkey tightens military-transit rules to stop illicit arms trade

    Ankara has significantly enhanced regulatory oversight of military equipment and defense-related goods transiting through Turkish territory under a newly enacted regulation. The framework, formally published in the Official Gazette on Monday, establishes comprehensive inspection protocols for defense industry products and components moving through Turkish transit routes or being re-exported by Turkish entities under transit trade arrangements.

    The cornerstone of the new regulation mandates that shippers must obtain a formal letter of conformity from the Ministry of Trade before moving controlled items through Turkish territory. The ministry will conduct thorough assessments of each application in consultation with relevant institutions and organizations. Shipments lacking this mandatory documentation will be prohibited from transiting through Turkey.

    Notably, the regulation extends beyond conventional military hardware, granting authorities inspection rights over products not typically classified as military components. The Ministry of Trade reserves the right to initiate conformity procedures when there is suspicion of potential military application, identified risks to national or international security, possible human rights violations, or concerns regarding adverse consequences for international relations.

    Turkish officials familiar with the matter clarified that the primary objective is to strengthen oversight of re-export activities rather than facilitate weapons transit. One official emphasized Ankara’s determination to prevent Turkey from becoming a hub for illicit arms trading, enabling more effective monitoring of cargo origins, contents, and final destinations.

    Defense industry experts speaking anonymously revealed that the regulation specifically targets attempts by arms dealers to utilize Turkish routes for channeling weapons from Eastern Europe and the Balkans into conflict zones. Particular concerns have been raised about weapons destined for Libya and Sudan, with suppliers allegedly using Turkish ports and borders as transit points due to direct shipment restrictions.

    The timing of the implementation has generated discussion on social media platforms, with some commentators questioning potential implications for NATO weapon transfers and Iran’s military imports given Turkey’s extensive border with Iran. However, official sources maintain the regulation is exclusively focused on preventing unauthorized arms trafficking through Turkish territory.

  • Trump nominee for Homeland Security chief grilled at fiery Senate hearing

    Trump nominee for Homeland Security chief grilled at fiery Senate hearing

    In a heated Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday, Markwayne Mullin, President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Department of Homeland Security, faced intense scrutiny over immigration policy and past controversial statements. The Oklahoma senator appeared before the Senate Homeland Security Committee, where he clashed notably with Committee Chairman Rand Paul, a fellow Republican who later announced he would oppose Mullin’s nomination.

    The hearing revealed deep divisions within the Republican party, with Paul confronting Mullin about past comments in which Mullin had called Paul a ‘freaking snake’ and suggested he understood why Paul had been assaulted by a neighbor in 2017. Paul questioned whether someone with ‘anger issues’ should lead an agency responsible for setting proper examples for immigration enforcement personnel.

    Mullin distanced himself from his fired predecessor Kristi Noem, who was dismissed partly due to her handling of a recent operation against undocumented migrants in Minnesota that resulted in federal agents shooting dead two U.S. citizen protesters. Mullin retracted previous remarks describing one of the deceased as a ‘deranged individual,’ conceding, ‘I shouldn’t have said that.’

    Regarding his vision for DHS, Mullin stated he aims to reduce the agency’s constant media presence: ‘My goal in six months is that we’re not the lead story every single day.’ He proposed restructuring ICE to focus more on transport rather than front-line enforcement and requiring judicial warrants for home or business entries unless pursuing known felons. Mullin also advocated for maintaining but restructuring FEMA, contrary to some administration proposals to eliminate the agency.

    With Republicans holding an 8-7 majority on the committee, Mullin’s nomination advancement requires a simple majority. Democratic Senator John Fetterman indicated he maintains an ‘open mind’ about the nomination. The committee vote is scheduled for Thursday.

  • ‘Act of domination’: Top Tory MP criticised for attack on Muslims praying in Trafalgar Square

    ‘Act of domination’: Top Tory MP criticised for attack on Muslims praying in Trafalgar Square

    A prominent Conservative MP has sparked widespread condemnation across Britain’s political spectrum after characterizing Muslim prayers at a public Ramadan event as an “act of domination.” Nick Timothy, former Downing Street chief of staff and current shadow justice secretary, faced bipartisan criticism for his remarks about the “Open Iftar” gathering in London’s Trafalgar Square that attracted multi-faith participants including Mayor Sadiq Khan.

    Timothy took to social media platform X on Monday to share footage of the prayer session, asserting that “mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination” and specifically targeting the adhan (Islamic call to prayer) as “a declaration of domination.” His comments ignited immediate backlash from parliamentary colleagues who defended Britain’s tradition of religious expression in public spaces.

    Independent MP Adnan Hussain responded by sharing historical images of Hindu, Jewish, and Sikh religious events held in the same landmark square, directly challenging Timothy: “Do you object when Sikhs, Hindus or Jews gather in Trafalgar Square? Or is it only Muslims you smear with talk of ‘domination’?”

    The criticism extended across party lines with former Conservative Attorney General Dominic Grieve noting that Trafalgar Square has historically hosted Christian and other religious events with official permission. Grieve warned that Timothy’s position either advocated for French-style secularism contrary to British tradition or represented outright discrimination against Muslims.

    Senior Labour figures intensified the rebuke, with Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy accusing Timothy of “fanning the flames of division” and Deputy Labour Leader Lucy Powell labeling his reaction “extreme” and reflective of “desperate hatred.”

    In contrast, Reform UK MPs Richard Tice and Sarah Pochin supported Timothy’s position, with Pochin traveling to the square to film a condemnation of what she termed a “domineering show of religious authority.” The event organizers, Ramadan Tent Project, emphasized their mission to “bring communities together and spread the spirit of Ramadan” through events open to all, including vulnerable and homeless individuals.

  • As Zambia nears election season, some warn against the ‘sextortion’ of female candidates

    As Zambia nears election season, some warn against the ‘sextortion’ of female candidates

    LUSAKA, Zambia — A disturbing pattern of sexual exploitation has emerged within Zambia’s political landscape, with senior male party officials allegedly demanding sexual favors from female election candidates in exchange for political endorsements. The scandal has triggered widespread condemnation from politicians and women’s rights advocates across the nation.

    The issue gained national attention when Mainga Kabika, Permanent Secretary of the government’s Gender Division, revealed this week that her office had received ten formal complaints of sexual harassment. The complaints allege that various high-ranking party officials—including chairpersons, youth leaders, and other senior figures—have solicited sexual exchanges for endorsing women candidates in Zambia’s upcoming August 13 national elections.

    Kabika issued a public appeal urging aspiring female candidates to gather concrete evidence against perpetrators, though she refrained from identifying specific parties or individuals implicated in the allegations.

    Saboi Imboela, President of the opposition National Democratic Congress, confirmed to The Associated Press that this problematic practice recurs during every election cycle. She noted that qualified candidates frequently find themselves sidelined for refusing to comply with these inappropriate demands, resulting in less capable individuals securing nominations instead.

    In response to the crisis, female politicians and NGOs including the Zambia National Women’s Lobby have established a special committee to combat what Imboela terms ‘sextortion.’ The initiative includes a toll-free helpline to support victims and document cases.

    The timing is particularly significant as Zambia prepares for comprehensive elections that will determine the presidency, parliamentary representatives, and local councilors. The nation currently suffers from severe gender imbalance in politics, with women occupying merely 15% of parliamentary seats according to the Inter-Parliamentary Union.

    Golden Nachibinga, Executive Director of the Zambia National Women’s Lobby, emphasized that previous allegations of similar misconduct have historically deterred women from political participation. Venna Banda, a mayoral aspirant for the ruling United Party for National Development, acknowledged her own encounters with sexual harassment during her political journey and urged women to resist such advances, while acknowledging the particular vulnerability of inexperienced candidates.

    Despite being a stable democracy, Zambia maintains a largely conservative and patriarchal social structure. The government attempted to address gender disparities last year by legislation reserving at least 20 parliamentary seats for women while also promoting representation for youth and disabled persons. President Hakainde Hichilema has previously acknowledged gender imbalances in Zambian politics, though his administration includes Vice President Mutale Nalumango, one of the nation’s highest-ranking female officials.

  • Five takeaways from Markwayne Mullin’s Homeland Security confirmation hearing

    Five takeaways from Markwayne Mullin’s Homeland Security confirmation hearing

    In a politically charged confirmation hearing, Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin faced rigorous questioning from Senate colleagues regarding his nomination to lead the Department of Homeland Security. The hearing occurred amid a partial government shutdown that has left DHS without funding for five weeks, affecting approximately 280,000 employees who continue working without pay.

    Mullin, known for his combative rhetorical style, promised a transformed approach to immigration enforcement while committing to protect all Americans regardless of political differences. ‘I can have different opinions with everybody in this room, but as Secretary of Homeland Security, I’ll be protecting everybody,’ Mullin stated during the three-hour proceedings.

    The nomination hearing revealed deep partisan divisions, with Republicans criticizing Democrats for the funding impasse while Democrats pressed Mullin on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) practices. Several Democratic senators questioned Mullin about his previous controversial comments, including his remarks about Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old man fatally shot by federal immigration officials in Minneapolis. While expressing regret for his characterization of Pretti as ‘deranged,’ Mullin declined to apologize to the family pending investigation completion.

    Judicial warrants emerged as a significant point of contention, with Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) raising concerns about ICE agents allegedly being instructed to break into homes without proper authorization. Mullin committed to requiring judicial warrants for property entries unless agents are actively pursuing someone inside.

    The hearing took a dramatic turn when Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), the committee chair, confronted Mullin about his past comments seemingly endorsing political violence. Paul referenced his own 2017 assault where he suffered six broken ribs, noting Mullin had previously stated he understood why the attack occurred. Despite this contentious exchange, Mullin’s nomination appears likely to advance with expected support from Senator John Fetterman (D-Pennsylvania).

    In an unexpected display of reconciliation, Sean O’Brien, president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, appeared in the front row. O’Brien had verbally attacked Mullin during a 2023 hearing, leading to a near-physical altercation that went viral. The two men have since reconciled, with Mullin shaking only O’Brien’s hand as he approached the dais, demonstrating an unexpected political détente.

  • Watch: Gabbard faces scrutiny over Iran nuclear intelligence claims

    Watch: Gabbard faces scrutiny over Iran nuclear intelligence claims

    United States Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard encountered intense congressional scrutiny during a recent oversight hearing, with Democratic lawmakers demanding explanations for apparent contradictions between intelligence community assessments and White House statements regarding Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

    The confrontation centered on what legislators characterized as significant discrepancies in how intelligence findings about Iran’s nuclear program have been presented by different branches of the administration. Committee members pressed the nation’s top intelligence official to clarify whether the White House had accurately represented the intelligence community’s analysis or potentially mischaracterized findings for political purposes.

    Gabbard, appearing before the House Intelligence Committee, defended the integrity of the intelligence process while acknowledging the complex nature of nuclear threat assessment. She emphasized that intelligence analyses often contain nuanced findings that can be subject to varying interpretations, but maintained that all official statements had remained consistent with the underlying intelligence.

    The hearing highlighted ongoing tensions between the legislative and executive branches regarding transparency in national security matters, particularly concerning sensitive intelligence on adversarial nations’ weapons programs. Lawmakers from both parties expressed concerns about maintaining clear distinctions between objective intelligence assessments and policy positions, especially regarding matters with significant geopolitical implications.

    This congressional examination occurs amid heightened global attention on non-proliferation efforts and follows recent international negotiations aimed at addressing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The intelligence community’s assessments on this matter carry substantial weight in shaping both domestic policy decisions and international diplomatic strategies.

  • Israel claims it killed Iran’s intelligence minister

    Israel claims it killed Iran’s intelligence minister

    Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz declared on Wednesday that Israeli forces had eliminated Iranian Intelligence Minister Esmail Khatib, signaling a significant escalation in hostilities against Iran and its regional allies. During a high-level military briefing, Katz warned of impending “significant surprises across all arenas” in the ongoing conflict with Iran and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

    Katz revealed that the intensity of Israeli operations within Iranian territory is intensifying, with Khatib representing the latest high-profile casualty. The Defense Minister further disclosed that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had jointly authorized the Israeli military to target senior Iranian officials without requiring additional clearance for each operation, indicating a broadened mandate for targeted assassinations.

    This development continues a pattern of strikes against Iranian leadership that began on February 28th with the killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Earlier this week, Israel also eliminated security chief Ali Larijani and Basij paramilitary commander Gholamreza Soleimani. Larijani, who had emerged as a de facto leader following Khamenei’s death, was reportedly seen participating in Tehran’s Al-Quds Day rallies just days before his assassination.

    The United States has concurrently intensified pressure on Iranian leadership, offering bounties of up to $10 million for information on senior figures associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. This coordinated approach between Washington and Tel Aviv represents a significant escalation in the ongoing confrontation with Iran’s political and military establishment, with implications for regional stability across the Middle East.

  • Macron names next nuclear-powered aircraft carrier ‘France Libre’ as a symbol of independence

    Macron names next nuclear-powered aircraft carrier ‘France Libre’ as a symbol of independence

    PARIS — In a significant demonstration of national defense strategy, French President Emmanuel Macron has officially designated France’s next-generation nuclear-powered aircraft carrier as “France Libre” (Free France). The announcement was made during a presidential visit to the Indret shipyard in western France, where the vessel’s dual nuclear reactors will be constructed.

    The future carrier, scheduled for operational deployment in 2038, represents a substantial naval advancement with capabilities to accommodate 30 Rafale fighter jets and a crew complement of 2,000 personnel. With an estimated development cost of €10 billion ($11.5 billion), the France Libre will feature an impressive displacement of 80,000 tons and measure 310 meters (1,017 feet) in length—marking a substantial size increase over France’s current flagship carrier, the Charles de Gaulle.

    President Macron framed the naming decision as deeply symbolic, connecting the vessel to General Charles de Gaulle’s World War II resistance movement that collaborated with Allied forces to liberate France from Nazi occupation. “This name carries the legacy of those who stood against barbarity, united to preserve our homeland,” Macron stated. “It embodies our commitment to future sovereignty: to maintain freedom, we must command respect. To command respect, we must maintain strength.”

    The announcement coincides with France’s substantial naval deployment to the Middle East region, described by Macron as “unprecedented” in scale. Current deployments include eight frigates, two helicopter carriers, and the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier, establishing France as the European nation with the most significant naval presence in the area.

    Notably, the France Libre will enhance France’s nuclear deterrence capabilities through its capacity to deploy nuclear-armed aircraft. This development follows Macron’s recent announcement regarding the expansion of France’s nuclear arsenal and the unprecedented authorization for temporary deployment of nuclear-capable aircraft to allied nations—a strategic move aimed at reinforcing European military independence. France remains the European Union’s sole nuclear power following the United Kingdom’s departure from the bloc in 2020.

    While substantial in scale, the France Libre will still be surpassed in size by the United States’ USS Gerald Ford, which displaces over 100,000 tons and measures 334 meters (1,100 feet) in length.

  • Xi meets National Leader of the Turkmen People and Chairman of the Halk Maslahaty of Turkmenistan

    Xi meets National Leader of the Turkmen People and Chairman of the Halk Maslahaty of Turkmenistan

    Chinese President Xi Jinping held a significant diplomatic meeting with Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov, National Leader of the Turkmen People and Chairman of the Halk Maslahaty of Turkmenistan, in Beijing on Wednesday. The high-level talks marked a substantial step in deepening the comprehensive strategic partnership between the two nations.

    The meeting focused on enhancing bilateral cooperation across multiple sectors, with particular emphasis on energy infrastructure development and regional security coordination. Both leaders exchanged views on implementing previously established agreements while exploring new avenues for economic and technological collaboration.

    President Xi emphasized China’s commitment to the Belt and Road Initiative framework, highlighting Turkmenistan’s crucial role as a key energy partner in Central Asia. The discussions also covered international affairs of mutual concern, with both parties expressing alignment on maintaining regional stability and promoting economic development.

    The engagement represents continued diplomatic momentum following previous high-level exchanges between the two countries. Observers note that strengthened China-Turkmenistan relations contribute to greater economic integration across Central Asia and demonstrate China’s growing diplomatic engagement in the region.