分类: politics

  • FIFA chief Infantino travels to Colombia for presidential inauguration

    FIFA chief Infantino travels to Colombia for presidential inauguration

    Embattled FIFA president Gianni Infantino touched down in the Colombian city of Cali on Friday, marking his arrival to attend the inauguration of new hard-right Colombian president Abelardo de la Espriella — all while a growing crisis roils the top leadership of global football’s governing body.

    Infantino finds himself at the center of a growing controversy that has engulfed FIFA in recent weeks. The firestorm was sparked by a heavily criticized plan to open the World Cup up to private investment, a proposal that was ultimately walked back in the face of widespread backlash from major football bodies across the globe. Despite the withdrawal of the investment plan, tensions remain high, with Europe’s governing football body UEFA reaffirming its threat to boycott future World Cup tournaments just one day before Infantino’s arrival in Colombia. The FIFA chief is currently gearing up to run for a fourth and final term as president, with the election set to take place in Rabat, Morocco, next March.

    During a public event with dozens of children dressed in full football kit in the southwestern Colombian city, Infantino leaned into his usual messaging around the sport, framing football as a unifying, joyful force. “It is a joy to be here today,” he told the gathered crowd. “Football is joy, football is happiness, football is unity. So many champions were born in this part of the world, in this part of Colombia.”

    When approached by an Agence France-Presse reporter on the ground in Cali, Infantino declined to respond to questions about whether he believed FIFA’s recent string of controversies had been fully resolved.

    Infantino has long-standing ties to prominent right-wing political figures, including former United States president Donald Trump, making his attendance at the inauguration of Colombia’s new hard-right leader unsurprising. In a break with longstanding Colombian political tradition, de la Espriella has chosen to host his inauguration ceremony in Cali — widely known as the global capital of salsa music — rather than holding the traditional swearing-in before the national Congress in the capital city of Bogota.

  • US appeals court halts Trump ballroom project paving way for Supreme Court showdown

    US appeals court halts Trump ballroom project paving way for Supreme Court showdown

    In a landmark ruling that tests the boundaries of U.S. presidential executive authority, a federal appeals court has ordered the Trump administration to immediately halt all above-ground construction of a controversial $400 million ballroom extension at the White House, delivering the latest major blow to the unauthorized project and setting up a potential high-stakes showdown before the U.S. Supreme Court.

    The three-judge panel’s majority ruling upholds an earlier preliminary injunction secured by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, a non-profit advocacy group that filed suit after the administration demolished a portion of the White House East Wing in 2025 to launch the project without securing the mandatory approval from Congress required for alterations to the iconic federal property.

    In its written opinion, the panel emphasized that decisions about large-scale structural changes to the White House — widely referred to as the “People’s House” — fall exclusively to the legislative branch, not unilateral action by the executive. “Whether or not a massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for Executive self-help,” the opinion stated. It added, “Congress has not ceded unfettered authority to the Executive Branch to dramatically redesign, reshape, and reconstruct the White House … to fit a particular President’s desires.”

    The legal challenge stems from the Trump administration’s move to advance the project without congressional appropriations or authorization. A lower federal judge had already twice blocked above-ground construction work on the extension, though the ruling allowed limited underground site work to continue. The administration immediately appealed that lower court order to the federal appeals circuit, setting up Friday’s ruling.

    In a procedural carveout, the appeals court delayed the enforcement of its construction halt for 14 days to give the Trump administration time to file an emergency appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court, should the White House choose to do so. The BBC has reached out to White House officials for official comment on the ruling, and had not received a response as of this update.

    President Trump has publicly defended the costly project on multiple occasions, arguing the new expanded ballroom is necessary to accommodate large events including state visits and official gatherings, and has gone so far as to frame it as a critical national security priority. Trump doubled down on these justifications following an assassination attempt at the annual White House Correspondents’ Association dinner in April 2026, though critics have questioned the link between the new construction and any credible security threat.

    This is an ongoing developing breaking news story, with additional details expected to be released in the coming days as the administration considers its next legal move.

  • Mexico and Peru restore diplomatic relations after asylum row

    Mexico and Peru restore diplomatic relations after asylum row

    A months-long diplomatic rift between Mexico and Peru has come to an end, with the two Latin American nations announcing the full restoration of bilateral relations on August 7, just one week after new Peruvian President Keiko Fujimori took office. The breakdown in ties stemmed from Mexico’s November 2025 decision to grant political asylum to former Peruvian Prime Minister Betssy Chávez, a close ally of ousted president Pedro Castillo who faced decades-long prison sentences over allegations of involvement in a 2022 coup attempt.

    In a joint bilateral statement released simultaneously by both governments, Lima and Mexico City emphasized that longstanding “historic ties of brotherhood, friendship and cooperation” between the two peoples provided the foundation for reconciliation. The statement also included a mutual reaffirmation of commitment to upholding international law and the core principles outlined in the United Nations Charter.

    The diplomatic standoff began shortly after Chávez, who had been released on bail in September 2025 while appealing her conviction, sought refuge inside Mexico’s embassy in Lima. Peruvian authorities granted Chávez safe passage to leave the country for Mexico, Peruvian Foreign Minister Carlos Espá confirmed to local outlet RPP, noting that the former prime minister has already exited Peruvian territory. In an official addendum to its public remarks, the Peruvian Foreign Ministry clarified that while the government approved Chávez’s travel to Mexico, it retains full legal authority to pursue an extradition request for her at a future date.

    At her regular daily press briefing, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum publicly welcomed Chávez to Mexico, and used the occasion to reiterate her administration’s longstanding support for Pedro Castillo, the former Peruvian president at the center of the 2022 political crisis. Castillo’s December 2022 attempt to dissolve the Peruvian congress and install an emergency government triggered his immediate impeachment by legislative authorities, and he was arrested on rebellion charges just hours after the attempted power restructuring.

    Chávez was first taken into custody in June 2023 on charges tied to her alleged role in Castillo’s dissolution plan. After maintaining her innocence throughout multiple court proceedings, she was ultimately convicted alongside Castillo in November 2025, with both men and women receiving prison sentences exceeding 11 years. Granted bail three months prior to the final ruling, Chávez moved to seek asylum in the Mexican embassy shortly after the conviction was handed down.

    The breakthrough in bilateral relations follows the inauguration of Fujimori as Peru’s new president, which took place just seven days before the reconciliation announcement. Analysts view the new government’s willingness to negotiate a resolution to the asylum dispute as a clear break from the previous Peruvian administration’s hardline stance toward Mexico over the issue.

  • Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan to sign defense pact on Friday, sources say

    Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan to sign defense pact on Friday, sources say

    An anonymous senior source based in Turkey’s capital Ankara has confirmed to independent outlet Middle East Eye that three major Muslim-majority nations — Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan — are scheduled to sign a historic joint defence agreement on Friday.

    Negotiations over the framework have been underway for more than a year, and the final deal comes at a moment of cascading crisis across the Middle East, sparked by recent joint Israeli-U.S. strikes on Iranian territory. The signing ceremony will be hosted in Mecca, one of the most sacred sites in Islam, with the heads of state of all three countries in attendance.

    One senior Ankara-based insider described the pact as a development that will reshape regional geopolitics. “If successfully implemented, the deal will enhance the stability and security of people living in this part of the world,” the source stated.

    According to insider accounts, the agreement will cover all domains of defence collaboration between the three nations. Crucially, officials have emphasized that the new trilateral framework will not supersede or weaken any existing bilateral or multilateral alliance commitments that each country currently holds.

    Officials have declined to publicly confirm whether the text includes a binding mutual defence clause, which would codify that an armed attack on one signatory counts as an attack on all three. A second anonymous source noted that such a clause is likely to be included, but added that final negotiations over the agreement’s text are still ongoing, so no details can be formally confirmed.

    In the lead-up to the signing, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan will depart for Saudi Arabia early Friday, where he will be received by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif already arrived in the Saudi port city of Jeddah, a short distance from Mecca, on Thursday to prepare for the ceremony.

    A completed pact would unite three of the most strategically significant powers in the broader Middle East and South Asia, each bringing unique geostrategic strengths to the alliance. Saudi Arabia, the world’s top oil exporter, holds the distinction of being the only Arab nation with a seat in the G20, and it hosts Islam’s two holiest cities: Mecca and Medina. Pakistan stands as the only nuclear-armed state in the global Muslim community, while Turkey, which bridges Europe and Asia, boasts the second-largest standing military within the NATO alliance. Both Pakistan and Turkey have also rapidly grown into major independent weapons manufacturers and defence exporters in recent years.

    Historically, Pakistan has maintained warm, stable relations with both Saudi Arabia and Turkey, but ties between Riyadh and Ankara have long been strained by geopolitical disagreements. During the 2011 Arab Spring, Erdogan publicly supported popular pro-democracy uprisings that Saudi Arabia’s leadership viewed as an existential threat to its monarchical governance model. A decade ago, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates backed opposing forces to Turkey in Libya’s civil war, and Riyadh supported current Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi after his 2013 coup — a move that drew fierce condemnation from Erdogan at the time.

    However, regional alliance dynamics have shifted dramatically in recent years, driven by shared alarm over Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, which the United Nations, leading human rights organizations, and dozens of historians have formally recognized as a genocide, as well as escalating Israeli attacks on Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. Erdogan and el-Sisi have since moved to repair bilateral ties over these shared concerns, and Saudi Arabia and Turkey began a gradual process of normalizing relations starting in 2021, laying the groundwork for the new defence pact.

    Middle East Eye, the outlet that first reported this development, provides independent, on-the-ground coverage of the Middle East, North Africa, and surrounding regions.

  • Watch: Pentagon releases fresh UFO videos in new document dump

    Watch: Pentagon releases fresh UFO videos in new document dump

    In a fresh round of public disclosures focused on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), more commonly known to the public as UFOs, the U.S. Department of Defense has dropped a new collection of previously unreleased material into the public domain. The tranche of materials, published on August 7, marks the fifth sequential batch of UAP-related records the Pentagon has released as part of its ongoing transparency initiative around unexplained aerial and celestial sightings.

    This latest document dump adds 41 new entries to the public archive, encompassing a full range of content types: official documents, captured still images, and raw video footage of encounters with objects that do not match known aircraft, drone, or natural atmospheric phenomena. The release comes as U.S. government agencies have gradually stepped up efforts to declassify and share records related to UAP after decades of limited official acknowledgment of military encounters with unexplained objects.

    For years, public and congressional interest in UAP has grown, driven in part by earlier releases of declassified Pentagon footage that showed unexplained craft maneuvering in restricted military airspace. This latest batch of materials is part of a congressionally mandated push to increase transparency around the government’s investigation of unexplained phenomena, giving researchers, journalists, and curious members of the public direct access to primary source materials collected by Defense Department personnel.

  • Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan sign defence pact

    Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan sign defence pact

    Against a backdrop of simmering regional conflict that has disrupted critical global energy shipping lanes and dragged neighboring states into rising violence, three major Sunni Muslim nations have formalized a new collective security agreement. In a ceremonial signing held in the holy Saudi city of Mecca, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif put their signatures to the historic Mecca Joint Defence Agreement.

    The core commitment of the new pact is clear: any armed aggression against one of the three signatories will be treated as an attack against all three nations. Beyond this mutual defense guarantee, the agreement also lays out a framework to deepen collaboration across all areas of defense cooperation, with the explicit goal of strengthening collective deterrence against external threats. However, the document stops short of outlining specific, binding obligations for each member state, leaving details of how the pact will operate in practice still undisclosed. A senior Turkish official speaking to Reuters emphasized that the agreement is strictly defensive in its purpose and scope.

    This new trilateral agreement builds on a bilateral defense pact that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan agreed to one year ago, expanding the existing security partnership to include Turkey. The three nations bring complementary strengths to the alliance: Saudi Arabia contributes substantial financial resources and stands as one of the world’s largest importers of advanced military hardware; Turkey, NATO’s second-largest standing military force, boasts a robust and advanced domestic defense manufacturing sector; and Pakistan brings nuclear deterrence capability to the coalition.

    The pact comes amid rapidly escalating instability in the Middle East, rooted in ongoing conflict between the United States and Iran that has spilled over to disrupt critical maritime trade routes. The Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global oil supplies pass, and the Red Sea have both seen major disruptions to shipping since hostilities flared. Following joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran in late February, Iran and its allied militias launched retaliatory attacks on targets across Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, and blocked commercial shipping transiting the region. Pakistan stepped in as a neutral intermediary, hosting ceasefire talks between the two sides that produced a temporary pause in fighting, but hostilities have since reignited.

    Though Saudi Arabia has long sought to avoid direct entanglement in the broader US-Iran conflict, repeated attacks from Iranian-aligned groups forced the kingdom to respond. After coming under attack from multiple directions, Riyadh joined the US in joint airstrikes last month against Iranian proxy militias in Iraq that it accuses of launching repeated drone strikes against Saudi targets. In neighboring Yemen, the Iran-backed Houthi movement, which controls large swathes of northwestern Yemen, has stepped up attacks: the group announced a formal maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia last month, and has launched strikes targeting Saudi airports, critical oil infrastructure, and commercial tankers operating in the Red Sea. In response, Saudi Arabia has launched counter-strikes against Houthi military positions and joined a new international naval coalition tasked with protecting commercial shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.

    For the three signatory nations, the new defense pact represents a coordinated effort to bolster collective security at a moment when regional tensions show no sign of de-escalation, and the United States faces growing challenges managing the spillover effects of the Iran conflict across the Middle East.

  • Colombia’s new president to take office in ceremony in Cali highlighting hard line on armed groups

    Colombia’s new president to take office in ceremony in Cali highlighting hard line on armed groups

    On Friday, Colombian President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella, a 48-year-old conservative political outsider, will be sworn into office in the southwestern city of Cali under stringent security measures, breaking with decades of tradition that inaugurate new heads of state in the capital Bogotá. The unconventional venue is no random choice: it is a deliberate public signal of the new president’s uncompromising hardline stance against the illegal armed groups that have long plagued Colombia’s volatile southwestern regions.

    De la Espriella, who earned the nickname “El Tigre” (The Tiger) during his campaign, defeated former President Gustavo Petro’s ally Senator Iván Cepeda in a close June 21 runoff election to succeed Petro. A Colombian-American lawyer and businessman who has never previously held public office, de la Espriella self-funded his entire campaign with the personal fortune he built over his decades in the private sector, running as an anti-establishment outsider against the incumbent left-wing government’s policies.

    His inauguration, set to take place in a university auditorium before the full session of Colombian Congress, cements a broader rightward political shift that has swept across Latin America in recent years. High-profile international attendees include Spain’s King Felipe VI and a slate of conservative regional leaders: Argentina’s President Javier Milei, Ecuador’s President Daniel Noboa, and Chilean conservative leader José Antonio Kast.

    Following the swearing-in ceremony, de la Espriella will travel to a local Cali military battalion to address deployed troops. The trip serves two core purposes: to boost military morale amid ongoing counter-insurgency operations, and to deliver an explicit ultimatum to illegal armed groups active in the region: surrender immediately, or be designated legitimate military targets. The new president has made dismantling the power of these groups a central campaign promise, rejecting the outgoing Petro administration’s signature policy of negotiating with armed factions. He has repeatedly argued that the decade-old peace process initiated by the government with former rebel groups has failed to curb widespread violence linked to illegal economies including drug trafficking and unregulated mining.

    Colombia’s southwestern regions currently face persistent instability from multiple competing armed factions: dissident splinter groups of the formerly demobilized Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) that rejected the 2014 peace agreement, the powerful Clan del Golfo drug cartel, and the ongoing National Liberation Army (ELN) guerrilla movement.

    On the international stage, de la Espriella’s rise to power has been framed by the backing of former U.S. President Donald Trump, coming at a moment of heightened regional anxiety over surging violent crime, mass irregular migration, and sluggish economic growth across Latin America. Glaeldys González, Andean analyst for the International Crisis Group, noted that de la Espriella’s election will reinforce the accelerating rightward shift across much of the region, helping to consolidate a cohesive bloc of conservative-led governments that stand in opposition to the shrinking number of remaining left-wing administrations across Latin America.

    De la Espriella has already confirmed that his new government will join the “Shield of the Americas”, a regional anti-drug trafficking coalition launched at a summit convened by Trump in March 2024. He has also announced sharp shifts in Colombian foreign policy: his administration will resume full diplomatic relations with Israel, while severing formal ties with Cuba and Nicaragua, which he has labeled authoritarian tyrannies.

    The new president will face immediate, fierce opposition from outgoing President Gustavo Petro, who has refused to recognize de la Espriella’s electoral victory and pushed unsubstantiated claims of widespread electoral fraud, alleging that thousands of vote tally sheets were manipulated by partisan programmers. Both Colombian electoral authorities and independent international election observers have thoroughly dismissed these fraud allegations.

    Political analyst Sergio Guzmán noted that Petro intends to act as a relentless, sharply critical opposition leader, using his platform to consolidate his standing among left-wing supporters. The outgoing president has gone so far as to urge social movements in southwestern Colombia to organize so-called “people’s militias” to defend against what he has labeled impending attacks from de la Espriella’s “fascist” administration. He has also called on his supporters to prepare for a national general strike if the new government moves to arrest him after he leaves office, a concern that comes after the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration named Petro a “priority target” in comments reported by the AP in March 2024.

    Andrés Macías, a conflict and peace researcher at Colombia’s Externado University, warned that the combination of Petro’s inflammatory mobilization calls and de la Espriella’s hardline policy approach significantly raises the risk of violent confrontations during street protests, as well as more aggressive security responses from the new government.

    Protests are already planned across multiple major Colombian cities during the inauguration: in Cali, where Petro retains a large base of support, social and student organizations have called for demonstrations during the swearing-in ceremony, with additional protest actions expected in the capital Bogotá and the northern coastal city of Barranquilla.

  • Republican Lisa Murkowski opposes Todd Blanche nomination for US attorney general

    Republican Lisa Murkowski opposes Todd Blanche nomination for US attorney general

    A high-stakes political battle over the permanent leadership of the U.S. Department of Justice has taken a sharp turn, as centrist Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska became the second member of her party to publicly reject former President Donald Trump’s nominee Todd Blanche for attorney general, deepening uncertainty over whether the nomination will survive a Senate vote.

    Blanche, who previously served as Trump’s personal defense lawyer and currently fills the role of acting attorney general, has faced sustained cross-party criticism since Trump tapped him to lead the Justice Department permanently. The nomination has already drawn opposition from a small but impactful bloc of Senate Republicans, and Murkowski’s opposition leaves confirmation hanging by a thread amid the narrow Republican majority in the chamber.

    In a formal statement announcing her decision, Murkowski highlighted deep-seated concerns that the Trump administration is seeking to politicize the nation’s top law enforcement agency, a red line for the moderate Alaska senator. She pointed to multiple controversial actions taken during Blanche’s short tenure as acting attorney general, including the administration’s controversial handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case files and the creation of a contentious $2 billion “anti-weaponization fund” carved out of a legal settlement between Trump and the federal government.

    Murkowski emphasized that the nation requires an attorney general willing to push back against the most extreme actions of the sitting administration. While she left open the possibility that Blanche could shift course if confirmed, she made clear she lacks confidence in his willingness to uphold the independence of the Justice Department. “The country needs an Attorney General who will check the worst impulses of this administration,” Murkowski wrote. “I hope Mr Blanche is able to achieve that, if confirmed, but I simply do not have confidence that will be the case.”

    The contentious fund at the center of the controversy was established as part of an IRS settlement between Trump and the federal government, which also granted Trump limited immunity from future personal tax audits. The fund was initially designed to pay out compensation to people who claim they were wrongfully persecuted by the federal government, but critics—including Murkowski—have warned it could ultimately payout to people convicted of participating in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Both Trump and Blanche have pushed back against these claims, asserting that neither the president nor his family are eligible to access any money from the fund. Facing backlash from fellow Republicans even before Murkowski’s announcement, Blanche already pledged to roll back the controversial fund.

    Murkowski’s announcement comes just days after another moderate Republican, Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who is facing a competitive re-election campaign this cycle, confirmed she would also vote against Blanche’s confirmation. Currently, Republicans hold a slim 53-seat majority in the 100-member U.S. Senate, but that majority has been effectively cut to 52 because Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has been absent from all floor votes and proceedings due to an ongoing illness.

    The path to confirmation now also hinges on the undecided vote of Republican Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who lost his 2026 Republican primary after Trump endorsed his primary challenger. Cassidy has not yet publicly stated whether he will support Blanche’s nomination, leaving the outcome entirely uncertain.

    Political analysts note that if just one more Republican joins Murkowski and Collins in opposing the nomination, Democrats can unified block Blanche’s confirmation, leaving Trump without his pick to lead the Justice Department. The nomination’s fragile standing underscores the lingering divisions within the Republican Party over Trump’s efforts to reshape the federal government and place loyalists in key law enforcement roles.

  • Plan to limit ‘vertical drinking’ decried by pub landlords and UK politicians

    Plan to limit ‘vertical drinking’ decried by pub landlords and UK politicians

    A seemingly mundane draft policy proposal from a London local government has ignited a fierce national political debate, after a plan targeting so-called “vertical drinking” — the bureaucratic term for standing while consuming alcoholic drinks — erupted into a major public relations headache for Westminster City Council.\n\nWestminster City Council oversees licensing for thousands of pubs, bars and restaurants across London’s iconic West End, a global nightlife destination that draws millions of tourists and local visitors each year. Standing drinkers who gather in small groups to socialize, often spilling out onto sidewalks on warm spring and summer evenings, have long been a defining feature of the district’s pub culture, particularly in bohemian Soho.\n\nVeteran Soho publican Lesley Lewis, who has managed the French House pub for 37 years, warned that cracking down on this beloved tradition would backfire badly for local businesses already struggling with soaring commercial rents and rising business taxes. “We rely on those people standing up with the rents and the rates put upon us,” she explained. “People want to enjoy themselves in Soho, they want to have a drink outside, they want to dance. They don’t want to sit down and just be where they are, they want to meet people and chat.” Driving these customers away, Lewis argued, would only push business to other parts of the UK capital.\n\nAfter British national newspapers seized on the proposal with splashy front-page headlines including “Sitting room only at pubs?” and “Soho’s pubs won’t take clamp down on ‘vertical drinking’ lying down,” Westminster council pushed back against what it called misleading and confusing media coverage of its draft plan.\n\nCouncil leader Paul Swaddle released an official statement clarifying that the policy, which is still open for public consultation, does not aim to ban people from standing with a drink entirely. Instead, he framed the proposal as a targeted effort to cut down on public noise and unruly behavior by encouraging venues to shift more open bar space to seated table service that also supports food orders. “Let me be clear about what we’re trying to achieve,” Swaddle said. “This is about safety, not stopping anyone standing at a bar with a pint in their hand.”\n\nThe full draft licensing policy clarifies that the proposal is designed to discourage excessive public drunkenness, by incentivizing business owners to create more seated space for drinkers and table food service, rather than maintaining large open bar areas dedicated to high-volume standing drinking. Westminster is home to more alcohol-licensed hospitality venues than any other local authority in the United Kingdom, and the council notes that while the hospitality sector is a critical driver of the local economy, local leaders also have a core responsibility to ensure Westminster remains “a great place for residents to live.”\n\nThat clarification did little to defuse the backlash from senior national and city government officials, who have prioritized reviving a UK hospitality sector that has yet to fully recover from widespread disruptions and financial losses during the COVID-19 pandemic. A spokesperson for Prime Minister Andy Burnham called standing pub culture not a nuisance, but a core part of “British life,” adding that Burnham is pushing local leaders to collaborate with the hospitality industry to help pubs thrive. During a recent visit to a pub in Essex, the prime minister doubled down on this stance, saying: “The pubs that we’ve got are at the heart of high streets, and I think it’s really important to signal at the start of my time in office that I will be a defender for them. I will speak up for them and act.”\n\nLondon Mayor Sadiq Khan has also waded into the row, signaling he plans to use new regulatory powers set to take effect for his office later this year to review the Westminster policy. Taking to social media platform X to share his criticism, Khan argued: “You can’t run a world-famous nightlife district with a village-hall mindset. London’s hospitality and nightlife support jobs, culture and growth.”\n\nThe controversy highlights the ongoing tension between local authorities’ efforts to manage quality of life for residential communities, and policymakers’ priorities to support the recovery of Britain’s iconic hospitality industry, which remains a cornerstone of national culture and local economic activity across the country.

  • Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan to sign defence pact amid regional violence

    Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan to sign defence pact amid regional violence

    Against a backdrop of spreading regional violence, broken ceasefires and shifting global security alliances, three key Muslim-majority nations — Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan — are preparing to sign a landmark joint defense agreement on Friday, multiple anonymous sources confirmed to Agence France-Presse.

    The accelerated finalization of the pact comes as the Middle East grapples with escalating conflict between the United States and Iran, which has spilled across neighboring borders, disrupted global shipping lanes through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea, and emboldened Iran-aligned militant groups across the region. Among these groups is Yemen’s Houthi movement, which has resumed large-scale attacks on Saudi territory after a four-year truce collapsed in recent weeks. The Houthis have also declared a maritime blockade against Saudi Arabia, launching strikes on Saudi commercial tankers to enforce their measure.

    Regional security analysts point to a growing perception among Saudi leadership that the United States, Riyadh’s long-time Western security partner, has become an increasingly unreliable ally amid the current crisis. In response, Saudi Arabia has actively pursued deeper security and diplomatic ties with regional and cross-regional partners including Turkey, Egypt and Pakistan, all of which have positioned themselves as neutral mediators working toward a negotiated end to ongoing conflicts across the Middle East.

    A source close to Saudi Arabia’s military and civilian leadership told AFP that while negotiations for the tripartite agreement have stretched over a long period, “the latest developments in the region expedited it.” A second anonymous source close to top Saudi officials confirmed the formal signing would proceed as scheduled on Friday.

    In line with the planned signing, high-level delegations from all three nations have gathered in Saudi Arabia’s Red Sea coastal city of Jeddah. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan arrived in Jeddah on Friday, according to official Saudi media, and is scheduled to hold bilateral talks with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman before joining a trilateral meeting with Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. Sharif and Pakistan’s Army Chief General Asim Munir also traveled to the kingdom this week, and the pair completed a religious pilgrimage to Mecca ahead of diplomatic talks, Pakistan’s information ministry confirmed Friday.

    The upcoming defense pact marks a deepening of already growing security cooperation between the three nations, which have been the subject of months of regional speculation about a new strategic alliance. Pakistan, the only nuclear-armed state in the Muslim world, already signed a bilateral defense agreement with Saudi Arabia in 2025, a deal that drew widespread international attention for its strategic implications. Islamabad has also positioned itself as a key mediator in efforts to de-escalate the U.S.-Iran war, while Turkey has taken a leading diplomatic role in negotiations aimed at ending the ongoing conflict in Gaza.

    The resumption of large-scale Houthi hostilities has added new urgency to Riyadh’s push for expanded security alliances. The Iran-backed Houthi movement, which has controlled Yemen’s capital Sanaa and most of northern Yemen for a decade, has fought against Saudi-led coalition-backed Yemeni government forces since 2015, when Riyadh launched its military intervention to support Yemen’s internationally recognized government. A four-year truce brokered in 2021 had largely held until recent weeks, when full-scale hostilities resumed.

    In one of the deadliest single attacks for government forces in years, Houthi missile and drone strikes killed at least 58 Yemeni government troops on Thursday, a Yemeni military source confirmed. The decade-long Yemeni civil war has already killed hundreds of thousands of people through direct combat, famine and lack of access to healthcare, triggering one of the world’s worst ongoing humanitarian catastrophes.

    Beyond the immediate crisis in Yemen, the Houthi resumption of attacks has compounded pressure on Gulf energy exporters, already strained by Iran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. The Houthis have also threatened global commercial shipping through the Red Sea, a critical chokepoint for roughly 12% of global oil trade and 10% of global seaborne trade, adding further disruption to already stressed global energy markets.

    Ahead of the talks, Pakistani foreign ministry spokesman Tahir Andrabi noted that the gathering and upcoming agreement carry weight far beyond the current regional crisis. “Although taking place against the backdrop of heightened tensions in the Gulf, the visit will carry significance beyond the immediate crisis and short-term considerations,” Andrabi said Thursday.