分类: business

  • Dubai property boom hits record Dh916 billion amid population growth

    Dubai property boom hits record Dh916 billion amid population growth

    Dubai’s property market has achieved an unprecedented milestone, reaching a staggering Dh916 billion (approximately $250 billion) in total transactions, propelled by a powerful convergence of record population growth and improving economic conditions. This historic performance underscores the emirate’s transformation into a premier global destination for business relocation and wealth migration.

    The catalyst for this boom is demographic: Dubai’s population has officially surpassed the four-million mark, adding approximately 18,000 new residents in a single month by August 2025. This sustained influx of professionals, entrepreneurs, and high-net-worth individuals is generating robust, genuine demand across all housing segments—from mid-market apartments to ultra-luxury waterfront properties.

    According to official Dubai Land Department data, the market closed 2025 with over Dh680 billion in property sales from more than 200,000 transactions—both record annual figures. When including mortgages and ancillary deals, the total real estate activity reached the Dh916 billion benchmark. The market’s momentum intensified throughout the year, with Q4 2025 alone recording an unprecedented Dh187 billion in sales, marking three consecutive months of record performance.

    Industry analysts from Savills Middle East confirm that this growth is structurally driven by authentic relocation demand rather than speculation. ‘When Dubai adds close to 18,000 residents in a single month, the impact on housing demand is immediate and tangible across enquiry levels and transaction speeds,’ noted Alec James Smith, Head of Residential Sales and Leasing at Savills.

    The prime segment demonstrated particular strength, with nearly 6,000 transactions exceeding Dh10 million completed in 2025. Limited supply in established luxury communities combined with continuous wealth inflows has positioned Dubai among the world’s top-performing prime residential markets.

    Supporting this growth, the UAE Central Bank’s policy moves have begun easing borrowing costs, gradually improving mortgage affordability after previous high-rate cycles. This financial easing is expected to further bolster end-user demand in coming quarters.

    Looking forward, market stability will depend on disciplined supply management and infrastructure development aligned with Dubai’s 2040 Urban Master Plan, which anticipates a population approaching six million within the next decade and a half. With fundamental drivers firmly in place, Dubai’s property market appears positioned for sustained, structurally-driven growth anchored by demographic expansion and global capital confidence.

  • UAE firm e&’s stake in UK’s Vodafone  Group rises to 17%

    UAE firm e&’s stake in UK’s Vodafone Group rises to 17%

    Emirates Telecommunications Group (e&), the UAE’s premier telecommunications provider, has witnessed its ownership stake in British telecom giant Vodafone Group escalate to 17.0050% without acquiring additional shares. This strategic development emerges directly from Vodafone’s ongoing share repurchase initiative, which effectively reduces the company’s total outstanding shares while maintaining e&’s holding at a constant 3,944.7 million shares.

    The Abu Dhabi-listed conglomerate initially entered Vodafone’s shareholder structure in May 2022 with a substantial $4.4 billion investment for a 9.8% stake. This position gradually expanded to 12% throughout 2023 before reaching its current level through organic financial mechanics rather than further capital deployment.

    Concurrently, Vodafone continues to execute its ambitious capital return strategy. The company recently launched a €500 million share buyback program scheduled to run from February 5 to May 11, 2026, following its monumental €2 billion repurchase initiative announced in May 2024. These financial maneuvers received impetus from regulatory approval of Vodafone Spain’s sale to Zegona Communications.

    Market indicators show Vodafone’s shares concluding the recent trading week at £115.45 on the London exchange, reflecting investor response to these corporate developments. The company’s November 2025 acquisition of nine million ordinary shares from Goldman Sachs represented another phase in its comprehensive capital management approach.

  • EU says US must honor a trade deal after court blocks Trump tariffs

    EU says US must honor a trade deal after court blocks Trump tariffs

    BRUSSELS — The European Union has formally requested comprehensive clarification from the United States regarding its rapidly evolving tariff policies, urging its transatlantic partner to honor previously established commitments. This diplomatic maneuver comes in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent invalidation of significant portions of former President Donald Trump’s tariff framework, followed by Trump’s subsequent announcement escalating his proposed global tariff rate from 10% to 15%.

    The European Commission, representing the trade interests of the 27 EU member nations, declared the current environment incompatible with achieving the “fair, balanced, and mutually beneficial” trade and investment relationship mutually agreed upon in the EU-U.S. Joint Statement of August 2025. This agreement had established a 15% import tax on approximately 70% of European goods entering American markets.

    Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s international trade committee, characterized the situation as “pure tariff chaos on the part of the U.S. administration,” noting that the unpredictability has created “only open questions and growing uncertainty” for EU trading partners. In response to the turmoil, Lange announced his intention to propose suspending the ratification process of the existing trade agreement through the European Parliament’s negotiating team.

    The EU emphasized its expectation that U.S. trade policies remain consistent with established agreements, stating unequivocally that “a deal is a deal.” As America’s largest trading partner, with bilateral trade in goods and services reaching €1.7 trillion ($2 trillion) in 2024, the EU maintains that its products should continue receiving the competitive treatment outlined in previous agreements.

    Europe’s primary exports to the U.S. include pharmaceuticals, automobiles, aircraft, chemicals, medical instruments, and alcoholic beverages, while American exports to the EU predominantly feature professional and scientific services, energy products, pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, aerospace technology, and automotive products.

    The Commission warned that unpredictably applied tariffs “undermine confidence and stability across global markets” and create significant uncertainty throughout international supply chains. The EU retains the option to deploy its Anti-Coercion Instrument—a comprehensive trade defense mechanism enabling restrictive measures against nations applying undue pressure on EU members. These measures could potentially restrict goods and services trade, exclude entities from EU public tenders, limit foreign direct investment, or ultimately restrict access to the EU’s 450-million-consumer market, potentially inflicting billions in losses on U.S. companies and the American economy.

  • JPMorgan closed Trump’s bank accounts one month after Jan 6 US Capitol attack

    JPMorgan closed Trump’s bank accounts one month after Jan 6 US Capitol attack

    Newly disclosed court filings reveal that JPMorgan Chase formally terminated banking relationships with former President Donald Trump and his hospitality enterprises in February 2021, precisely one month following the January 6th Capitol insurrection. The documentation emerged within the framework of a $5 billion litigation initiated by Trump against both the financial institution and its Chief Executive Officer, Jamie Dimon.

    The correspondence, dated February 19, 2021, did not articulate specific grounds for the account closures. One communication indicated the bank’s prerogative to conclude client relationships when it determines the association no longer serves the institution’s interests. This development occurred amidst a broader pattern of corporate disengagement from Trump-affiliated entities subsequent to the Capitol siege, which included severed ties with legal representatives and the revocation of prestigious golf tournaments.

    JPMorgan’s legal representatives have characterized the lawsuit as without merit, while simultaneously pursuing its transfer from Miami federal jurisdiction to New York courts, citing the latter’s more substantial connections to the dispute. Conversely, Trump’s legal counsel has portrayed the emergence of these termination letters as a pivotal admission that substantiates their allegations of politically motivated financial exclusion.

    The former president’s legal team contends that the banking giant engaged in unlawful de-banking practices that inflicted significant economic detriment. Trump maintains that JPMorgan, as the nation’s premier banking institution, deliberately contravened its established protocols to align with contemporary political currents rather than objective financial criteria.

  • Trump announces immediate global tariffs increase from 10% to 15%

    Trump announces immediate global tariffs increase from 10% to 15%

    In a dramatic escalation of international trade policy, former US President Donald Trump has declared an immediate increase of worldwide tariffs from 10% to 15%. The announcement was made via his Truth Social platform on February 21, 2026, marking a significant hardening of his protectionist economic stance.

    The decision follows what Trump characterized as a comprehensive review of a recent Supreme Court ruling that struck down his previous sweeping tariff measures. He described the judicial decision as “ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American,” expressing profound disappointment with the 6-3 ruling delivered just days earlier.

    Citing decades of perceived economic exploitation, Trump asserted that numerous nations have been systematically “ripping off” American interests without facing appropriate consequences. The administration maintains that this tariff adjustment operates within legal boundaries, having been “legally tested” under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. This legislation permits the executive branch to implement duties of up to 15% for 150-day periods against countries experiencing substantial balance of payments complications.

    The White House indicated that this measure represents merely the initial phase of a broader strategy, with additional legally permissible tariffs under consideration for implementation in coming months. These actions form part of Trump’s renewed commitment to his “Making America Great Again” platform, which he now promises to exceed “GREATER THAN EVER BEFORE.”

    This development occurs against the backdrop of recent diplomatic assertions from Trump regarding the effectiveness of tariff threats in international relations, including claims that proposed 200% tariffs compelled India and Pakistan to establish a ceasefire agreement.

  • Global leaders and businesses pore over fallout of more US tariff swoons

    Global leaders and businesses pore over fallout of more US tariff swoons

    The global economic community entered a state of heightened alert this weekend as nations and corporations worldwide assessed the ramifications of a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that partially dismantled the Trump administration’s expansive tariff framework. The ruling represents the latest development in an ongoing trade policy revolution that has destabilized international commerce since the administration’s return to power thirteen months ago.

    In immediate response to the judicial setback, President Trump signed an executive order instituting a new 10% global tariff, which he subsequently announced would be elevated to 15%. This strategic pivot has forced trading partners from Asia to the Americas into emergency evaluations of their economic exposure. South Korea’s Trade Ministry convened an urgent meeting to analyze the shifting landscape, noting that while key exports like automobiles and steel remain unaffected, numerous other sectors now face renewed financial pressure.

    European leaders responded with measured diplomatic rhetoric. French President Emmanuel Macron, speaking at a Paris agricultural fair, acknowledged the value of institutional checks and balances within democracies, stating, “It’s a good thing to have powers and counter-powers. We should welcome that.” However, Macron simultaneously cautioned against premature celebration, emphasizing Europe’s intention to scrutinize the practical consequences of Trump’s reworked tariff measures.

    The uncertainty has created particular strain along the U.S.-Mexico border, where industrial economies remain deeply interconnected. Sergio Bermúdez, who leads an industrial parks company in Ciudad Juárez, captured the prevailing sentiment among business leaders: “All of the businesses I know are analyzing, trying to figure out how it’s going to affect them.” This confusion has been compounded by what American executive Alan Russell described as the “greatest enemy”—persistent uncertainty regarding daily regulatory changes that have complicated international operations.

    Meanwhile, financial restitution emerged as a critical secondary concern. Bernd Lange, chairman of the European Parliament’s trade committee, insisted that excess tariffs “must be refunded,” estimating German entities alone overpaid more than €100 billion. Swiss technology industry association Swissmem welcomed the court’s decision as positive news for an industry that saw exports plummet 18% in just one quarter, though officials acknowledged the situation remains fluid and unresolved.

  • Gold price likely to hit $6,000 this year, seen heading towards $10,000, analysts say

    Gold price likely to hit $6,000 this year, seen heading towards $10,000, analysts say

    Financial markets are witnessing an unprecedented rally in gold prices, with leading analysts projecting a potential ascent to the unprecedented $10,000 per ounce mark. After consolidating near $5,100 per ounce, the precious metal is poised for a significant surge as Asian trading hubs resume operations following the Chinese New Year hiatus, expected to inject renewed volatility and upward momentum.

    The current bullish trajectory is underpinned by a confluence of powerful fundamental drivers. Senior research strategist Michael Brown of Pepperstone identifies the recent market calm not as stagnation, but as a highly bullish indicator. He suggests the speculative frenzy has subsided, allowing core market fundamentals to reassert control. These fundamentals include sustained geopolitical risk premiums from ongoing Middle Eastern tensions, relentless demand from central banks diversifying their reserves, and increasing retail investor allocations into gold as a portfolio safeguard.

    Further bolstering the long-term outlook are deep-seated concerns over the unsustainable fiscal policies of developed nations. Brown emphasizes that any price dips should be viewed as strategic buying opportunities, with key support levels established at $4,850 and $4,700 per ounce. A decisive break above the recent high of $5,100 is anticipated to trigger a fresh wave of long positions.

    Zaheer Anwari, CEO of The Revacy Fund, echoes this cautiously optimistic sentiment. He confirms that gold’s status as the premier safe-haven asset is being reinforced by a broad shift away from U.S. assets and persistent central bank accumulation, which collectively act as a robust floor for prices. The prospect of U.S. monetary policy easing continues to serve as a significant tailwind.

    However, analysts caution that the rally is not without potential headwinds. A de-escalation of global conflicts, a more hawkish-than-expected Federal Reserve, or a slowdown in institutional buying could trigger short-term volatility and profit-taking. Anwari’s fund has adopted a more cautious stance, tightening risk parameters and realizing gains near the $5,000 threshold while awaiting clearer directional confirmation.

    This analysis aligns with projections from major global institutions. JPMorgan forecasts gold reaching $6,300 per ounce by the end of 2026, while AuAg Funds predicts the metal will surpass $6,000 within the year, building on its record-breaking performance earlier in 2026 that saw it cross the $5,500 milestone.

  • India ready to compete on same level as China, says Saudi businessman at Mumbai forum

    India ready to compete on same level as China, says Saudi businessman at Mumbai forum

    MUMBAI – A prominent Saudi Arabian investor has positioned India as a peer competitor to China, citing its vast resources and execution capabilities, while calling for critical financial reforms to bolster its small and medium enterprise (SME) sector. The remarks were delivered by Ali Abdulla Ahmed Al Amoudi, Principal and co-founder of Al Almoudi Holdings, during the Global Economic Cooperation 2026 forum organized by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs.

    Al Amoudi articulated a robustly optimistic outlook for the Indian economy, describing it as a nation of ‘monumental opportunity’ equipped with the essential trinity for success: financial capital, an extensive workforce, and strategic know-how. ‘India possesses the necessary know-how and its people truly understand how to execute large-scale ambitions,’ he stated, forecasting the country’s continued ascent to a global standing comparable to China’s.

    However, his analysis included a crucial caveat. The executive identified prohibitively high interest rates as a significant impediment to inclusive growth. Expressing surprise that Indian SMEs face borrowing rates between 15-18%, Al Amoudi argued that such margins stifle expansion and prevent smaller companies from contributing to national infrastructure projects. He issued a compelling call to action for financial institutions to offer low-interest financing, asserting that supporting SMEs is fundamental to ensuring a healthy and stable national economy.

    The dialogue also underscored the deepening symbiotic economic relationship between the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations and India. Al Amoudi highlighted the reciprocal nature of this partnership, noting that while a vast Indian workforce supports the Gulf economy, Saudi and other GCC investors are increasingly channeling capital into Indian infrastructure. This dynamic, he suggested, is evolving from a history of joint ventures into long-term strategic partnerships.

    A significant shift in Gulf investment strategy was also outlined. Al Amoudi indicated that after a period of substantial internal investment, such as the hundreds of billions deployed in Dubai and the UAE, the region is now positioned to export its expertise and technical ‘know-how’ to partner nations. ‘We no longer view ourselves strictly as investors, but as partners,’ he explained, emphasizing that in an era of available capital, the true challenge lies in forming alliances based on mutual economic interest and expertise, rather than political benefit.

    Concluding with a macro-economic perspective, the businessman framed infrastructure investment as a non-optional imperative for global economic stability. He posited that nations are interconnected components of a global whole, and investing in each other’s critical infrastructure—from airports to hospitals—is essential for fostering future trade partners and ensuring collective prosperity.

  • Trump signs 10 percent global tariff on all countries

    Trump signs 10 percent global tariff on all countries

    In a landmark economic policy shift, former President Donald Trump has enacted a comprehensive 10% tariff on imports from all trading partners worldwide. The sweeping measure, signed on February 21, 2026, represents one of the most extensive trade policy interventions in modern economic history, effectively applying uniform import duties across all nations without exemptions.

    The policy departure marks a significant escalation from previous targeted tariff approaches, establishing a blanket import tax that economists predict will trigger substantial adjustments in global supply chains and international trade relations. The uniform nature of the tariff structure eliminates country-specific trade preferences that have characterized international commerce for decades.

    Trade analysts anticipate immediate repercussions across multiple sectors, with consumer goods, automotive imports, and electronics expected to experience price increases. Manufacturing industries reliant on imported components face potential cost pressures, while domestic producers may benefit from reduced foreign competition.

    The implementation coincides with ongoing diplomatic engagements, as evidenced by recent high-level discussions between Chinese Foreign Ministry officials and European counterparts emphasizing cooperation. These parallel developments highlight the complex interplay between trade policy and international diplomacy in the current global landscape.

    Market observers are monitoring potential retaliatory measures from major trading partners, which could initiate a new phase of trade adjustments affecting trillions of dollars in global commerce. The policy’s long-term implications for inflation, economic growth, and international relations remain subjects of intense speculation among policymakers and economists worldwide.

  • Murky outlook for businesses after tariff ruling prompts countermoves by Trump

    Murky outlook for businesses after tariff ruling prompts countermoves by Trump

    The U.S. business community faces extended trade policy instability following a landmark Supreme Court decision that struck down presidential tariffs imposed under emergency powers. Despite the court’s ruling that President Donald Trump overstepped his authority, the administration immediately pledged to utilize alternative legal mechanisms to maintain import taxes, creating fresh uncertainty for American enterprises.

    Corporate leaders across multiple sectors expressed concern about the practical implications of the legal victory. While the Supreme Court determined that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act did not authorize presidential tariff imposition, the ruling affects only specific duties, leaving steel, aluminum, furniture, and cabinet tariffs intact. Within hours of the decision, President Trump announced plans to implement a comprehensive 10% tariff on all imports for 150 days while exploring additional trade remedies.

    Economic analysts warn that any potential relief from lowered tariffs may be negated by prolonged uncertainty. Michael Pearce of Oxford Economics noted, “With the administration likely to rebuild tariffs through other, more durable means, the overall tariffs rate may yet end up settling close to current levels.”

    The complex process of reclaiming an estimated $133-$175 billion in previously collected tariffs now deemed illegal favors large corporations with substantial legal resources, leaving small businesses and consumers unlikely to receive compensation. Industries including retail, technology, and agriculture have borne significant costs, with companies implementing price increases, supply chain diversification, and cost-cutting measures to offset tariff impacts.

    International trading partners reacted with skepticism to the development. Italian winemakers, European manufacturers, and Canadian exporters expressed concerns that alternative tariff mechanisms could maintain or exacerbate trade tensions. Lamberto Frescobaldi of Italian winemakers association UIV warned of “renewed uncertainty in commercial relations between Europe and the United States,” while ING economist Carsten Brzeski noted that alternative legal authority could produce identical or worse economic impacts.

    Business leaders across sectors emphasized the need for trade policy stability. Jonathan McHale of the Computer & Communications Industry Association stated, “With this decision behind us, we look forward to bringing more stability to trade policy,” echoing sentiments from retail, agricultural, and manufacturing representatives who have faced increased costs and operational challenges throughout the trade disputes.