分类: business

  • Origin Energy forced to repay thousands over misleading electricity saver plan

    Origin Energy forced to repay thousands over misleading electricity saver plan

    A major Australian energy retailer is set to issue hundreds of thousands of dollars in compensation after Australia’s competition regulator confirmed the company overcharged thousands of households on a misleadingly marketed plan. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has ordered Origin Energy to refund a total of $270,000 to 4,500 residential customers who were incorrectly billed on the provider’s so-called “ongoing savers” plan.

    The investigation into Origin’s pricing practices launched after consumer advocacy group Choice submitted formal complaints, raising alarms that energy suppliers across the country were using confusing, misleading plan names to falsely advertise cost savings to households. ACCC Commissioner Anna Brakey explained that many customers who signed up for the “ongoing savers” plan ultimately ended up paying higher rates than customers on Origin’s basic, no-frills plan, directly contradicting the value promised by the plan’s branding.

    “Energy plans are inherently complex, with layered usage and supply charges that make it challenging for the average consumer to accurately compare potential savings across offerings,” Brakey noted. “It is the core responsibility of retailers to deliver clear, accurate information about their plans so consumers can make fully informed choices that fit their household budgets.”

    Under the remediation order, each affected household will receive an average refund of approximately $60, though impacted customers have the option to apply the amount as a credit to their future energy bills instead of claiming a cash refund. In an official statement following the regulator’s announcement, Origin Energy acknowledged the error and apologized to the affected customers, who make up just 0.5% of all customers enrolled in the “ongoing savers” plan. The company added that the average overcharge per affected household sat at roughly $28, and that it has already implemented internal pricing adjustments to prevent a repeat of the error, with refund disbursements currently underway.

    Beyond the Origin Energy case, the ACCC used the announcement to issue a broader warning to all Australian energy consumers: long-term loyalty to a single provider rarely benefits the customer, and instead pads the bottom lines of energy companies. The watchdog urged all households to proactively shop around for cheaper energy plans, noting that consumers can request a better rate directly from their current provider. Under Australian regulations, retailers are legally required to disclose how a customer’s existing plan pricing stacks up against the national regulated price safety net.

    Brakey encouraged consumers to take advantage of free, government-run energy comparison tools to find plans aligned with their specific usage needs, adding that the gap between the cheapest and most expensive energy plans on the market remains substantial, leaving hundreds of dollars in potential annual savings on the table for inactive customers.

  • The SpaceX IPO made history. One month on has it lost momentum?

    The SpaceX IPO made history. One month on has it lost momentum?

    One month after SpaceX made its historic debut on public stock markets, investors who once celebrated the listing have shifted to growing concern over the company’s volatile share performance.

    When Elon Musk-led SpaceX opened trading to individual investors on June 12, the IPO sparked an immediate buying frenzy. Priced at $135 per share in the company’s official offering, the stock jumped to $150 within minutes of the first session, peaked at $176 intraday, and closed at $160.95. This listing cemented SpaceX as the largest initial public offering in global history, and momentum only accelerated in the following week: shares hit an intraday high of $225, pushing the company’s total market capitalization above both Amazon and Microsoft.

    Industry analysts note that much of this initial hype was tied to artificial intelligence, rather than SpaceX’s core aerospace business. “With Elon Musk, any company he touches gets people excited,” explained Keith Snyder, an analyst at investment research firm CFRA. “But this was also the first time people felt like they were able to invest in something that was being marketed as an AI play.”

    Willy Lee, an investor at Neosteller, a firm that enables individual investment in private pre-IPO companies, echoed this assessment, saying “Everyone saw SpaceX as an AI story.” That narrative gained traction after SpaceX acquired Musk’s standalone AI startup xAI earlier this year, rebranded the firm as SpaceXAI (known for its controversial chatbot Grok), and began offering data center leasing services to external tech companies.

    But as the hype faded, investors began refocusing on the reality of SpaceX’s core revenue streams: manufacturing and launching rockets, and operating its Starlink satellite internet network. The first major pullback came when Starlink announced price cuts for its services in Memphis, Tennessee, amid local pushback against a planned massive SpaceX data center project; the stock dropped 8% on that single trading day.

    Since that initial drop, shares have fallen steadily, even against a broader backdrop of volatility across the technology sector. For example, when SpaceX was added to the Nasdaq 100 index on July 7, the overall index fell 1.7% – but SpaceX dropped 4.4% over the session. A prior addition to the FTSE Russell index had only delivered a minor, temporary boost to share prices.

    By the end of its first full month as a public company, SpaceX shares traded around $145 per share. That marks an 18% drop from the first day’s closing price and a 35% fall from the stock’s all-time peak so far. Early retail investors who bought shares in the first five days of trading are now facing significant paper losses. “If you bought around the first tick you’re definitely underwater,” Snyder said, adding that the stock’s initial run began to look a lot like a meme stock, echoing the 2021 GameStop rally and more recent Wendy’s price surge driven by coordinated retail investor excitement online rather than underlying business fundamentals.

    Snyder projects the stock could fall even further, to around $115 per share, aligned with the company’s current operating performance, which would value SpaceX at roughly $1.5 trillion.

    Samuel Kerr, head of equity capital markets analysis at Mergermarket, noted that the extreme price swings have impacted different investor groups very differently. “If you’re an IPO investor, you’re ok,” Kerr said, referring to institutional investors who bought shares at the original $135 offering price and early insiders who held pre-IPO equity. “If you bought in the first few days, you’re not very happy right now.”

    Despite the market turbulence, Musk has remained unwaveringly optimistic about SpaceX’s long-term business prospects. The IPO’s valuation surge made him the world’s first trillionaire, and he has publicly predicted that SpaceX will hit $1 trillion in annual revenue by 2030.

    Musk has also leveraged the stock’s volatility for strategic corporate moves. When shares spiked on June 16, SpaceX announced an all-stock $60 billion acquisition of Cursor, a startup that builds AI tools for code writing. Given the size of the share price gain at that moment, Kerr noted, Musk essentially acquired the company for free. “It showed a level of market sophistication that almost no other issuer has,” Kerr said of the deal.

    Not all financial analysts are bearish on the stock. Morgan Stanley, the lead underwriter for SpaceX’s IPO, initiated coverage of the stock last week with a $300 per share target price – 33% higher than the stock’s current all-time peak, suggesting the current dip is only a temporary setback.

    Public filings from SpaceX’s IPO process show the company currently operates at a net loss, and generated $18 billion in total revenue last year. Musk’s $1 trillion annual revenue projection for 2030 is 55 times that 2025 figure, leaving analysts to question how the company will hit that aggressive target.

    All eyes are now turning to SpaceX’s first public earnings report, expected to drop in early August, though no official date has been announced. The report will coincide with the end of SpaceX’s IPO lock-up period, which has prohibited employees from selling equity granted as compensation. When the lock-up expires, thousands of new shares will enter the open market, a shift that could add further volatility to the stock price.

    “If SpaceX can do all the things it says it will do, yes, investors are sitting on the most valuable company ever,” Kerr said. “But it’s got a lot of work to do to get there.”

  • Heartland Wines in voluntary administration after more than two decades producing premium reds

    Heartland Wines in voluntary administration after more than two decades producing premium reds

    After building a 20-year legacy crafting award-winning South Australian red wines, Heartland Wines has entered voluntary administration, leaving the future of the well-known regional wine label uncertain.

    Founded in the early 2000s by a collective of industry leaders including celebrated winemaker Ben Glaetzer, Scott Collett, Grant Tilbrook, Geoff Hardy and Vicky Arnold, Heartland Wines built its reputation on producing premium yet approachable red vintages sourced from two iconic South Australian wine growing regions: Langhorne Creek and the Limestone Coast. Over its two decades in operation, the label launched popular products including Director’s Cut Shiraz and Heartland One, focusing on iconic varieties such as Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon, and built distribution across domestic and international markets.

    On June 15, the company officially appointed Daniel Lopresti and Anna Agostino from insolvency firm Clifton Hall as voluntary administrators, in a move initiated by Heartland Wines’ own leadership under Section 436A of Australia’s Corporations Act, according to official notices filed with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

    The next steps for the winery will now be determined by its creditors, who will vote on three potential outcomes: allowing the business to continue operating via a structured deed of company arrangement, returning control of the company back to its board of directors, or winding up the business entirely. For consumers and industry observers, the administration of the well-regarded regional label highlights ongoing economic pressures facing small and medium-sized wine producers in Australia’s competitive global wine market.

  • Australian sharemarket defies global fears as big banks offset tech slump

    Australian sharemarket defies global fears as big banks offset tech slump

    Against a backdrop of escalating geopolitical conflict between the United States and Iran that sent global oil prices soaring and dragged most international equity markets lower, Australia’s domestic sharemarket defied broader headwinds to notch a marginal positive close in Monday’s trading session.

    The benchmark S&P/ASX 200 squeezed out a tiny 2.50-point gain, equal to 0.03 percent, to settle at 8808.50, while the broader All Ordinaries index posted a barely perceptible 0.70-point drop, or 0.01 percent, to end the day at 9003.00. The Australian dollar also softened against the U.S. dollar, falling to 69.29 U.S. cents by market close.

    Trading was deeply split across the market’s 11 sectors, with five closing in positive territory. Solid gains in consumer discretionary stocks and the nation’s largest retail banks offset a sharp downturn in the technology sector, which pulled the overall market back from larger gains. Leading the upward momentum in consumer discretionary was retail conglomerate Wesfarmers, which climbed 1.81 percent to $91.32. The Lottery Corp added 1.46 percent to close at $5.56, and electronics retailer JB Hi-Fi rose 1.09 percent to finish at $78.95.

    Australia’s big four national banks emerged as one of the day’s strongest performing groups. Commonwealth Bank of Australia gained 0.69 percent to hit a round $170.00, Westpac Banking Corp added 0.99 percent to reach $36.90, National Australia Bank climbed 1.11 percent to $40.05, and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group outperformed its peers with a 1.14 percent rally to close at $36.46.

    The main drag on market performance came from technology stocks, which collectively slumped 2.57 percent after a weak lead-in from overseas tech markets. Cloud accounting firm Xero led the downturn, dropping 4.31 percent to $70.24. Logistics technology firm WiseTech Global fell 2.00 percent to $33.32, and data center operator NextDC declined 3.16 percent to $13.50.

    The escalating exchange of military strikes between the U.S. and Iran dominated market sentiment through the session, driving a near five percent spike in international Brent Crude prices, which rose to just over $79 U.S. per barrel, equal to roughly $113.99 Australian. Iran launched missile and drone attacks on bases linked to the U.S. across Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan, while the U.S. military carried out coordinated strikes on Iranian military infrastructure, including air defense systems, coastal radar outposts, and missile and drone facilities. Over the weekend, Iran announced it would close the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, a key chokepoint for 20 percent of global oil supplies, until further notice, though U.S. Central Command confirmed the waterway remained open to transit.

    Vivek Dhar, head of commodities and sustainability research at Commonwealth Bank, explained that the oil price jump stemmed from market uncertainty over the future accessibility of the strait. “Over the past week, oil prices have traded in a tight range between $75 U.S. and $80 U.S. per barrel,” Dhar noted. “This price range signals that markets broadly expect the Strait of Hormuz will remain open for oil tanker transit, so investors have heavily discounted Iran’s claims that it has closed the waterway.”

    In individual corporate news, fashion retailer City Chic was one of the day’s top performers, with shares surging 27.78 percent to $0.069 after the firm upgraded its underlying earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization guidance to a range of $11.5 million to $12.5 million, representing an 80 to 95 percent jump compared to the same period last year. Aged care provider Regis Healthcare fell 2.53 percent to $6.16 after chief financial officer Rick Rostolis announced he would retire at the end of August, capping a more than 40-year career across multiple ASX-listed firms. Outdoor advertising firm Ooh!media jumped 4.07 percent to $1.54 after confirming it had received three non-binding takeover proposals from private equity groups Pacific Equity Partners, I Square Capital, and Oaktree Capital Management. The leading proposal values the firm at $871.6 million. Mining firm Regis Resources slipped 0.92 percent to $60.46 after it announced it would abandon its planned acquisition of junior miner Vault Minerals, clearing the way for rival bidder Genesis Minerals to proceed with its own takeover offer for Vault. Following the announcement, Genesis shares climbed 3.70 percent to $5.88, while Vault Minerals added 0.82 percent to close at $4.91.

  • Cult activewear brand Stax collapses into voluntary liquidation

    Cult activewear brand Stax collapses into voluntary liquidation

    Once a rising Australian challenger to global activewear giants Lululemon and Nike, popular inclusive fashion label Stax has formally entered voluntary liquidation, leaving thousands of customers uncertain about unfulfilled orders and unusable gift cards, according to official updates from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).

    The liquidation process comes after National Australia Bank (NAB), Australia’s one of the big four banking groups, appointed receivers from FTI Consulting earlier this year to recover outstanding debt owed by the brand. Following this step, the ACCC confirmed that joint liquidators Brian Silvia and Michael Hird from Cascap Advisory have been appointed to oversee the wind-down of multiple Stax corporate entities. Unlike receivers, whose primary mandate is to recover funds for specific creditors (in this case NAB), liquidators are tasked with selling off all remaining assets of the insolvent business and distributing proceeds evenly across all outstanding creditors.

    Founded in 2015 and formally registered in Western Australia in 2017, Stax grew from a small grassroots startup to a major competitor in the global activewear market. The brand built a massive cult following across Australia for its signature “buttery soft” leggings, fashion-forward designs, and industry-leading inclusive sizing, operating both an e-commerce platform and two physical boutique stores in Sydney and Liverpool. At its peak operational height, Stax generated more than AUD 30 million in annual revenue and employed more than 160 workers across the country. Just one month before entering liquidation, Stax’s co-founders Dan and Matilda Murray made a last-ditch effort to keep the business solvent, selling off its retail store assets and luxury personal vehicles including a Lamborghini and a Porsche.

    In an official public statement posted to Stax’s website, the brand confirmed that a large number of pending customer orders will not be fulfilled, and the company is no longer able to honor outstanding gift cards or store credit notes. Receivers first took control of Stax operations on June 24 to assess the business and negotiate with key stakeholders to explore options for continued trading, but those talks have not resulted in a rescue deal to date.

    Customers who purchased items in pre-sale promotions on or before June 24 face particular uncertainty: the company noted that most pre-ordered goods were not held in domestic stock, instead relying on overseas suppliers to manufacture and ship inventory to Australia. Order fulfillment for these purchases depends on cooperation from the full supply chain, including overseas manufacturers, freight forwarders, and third-party logistics providers, many of which are also owed outstanding payments by Stax. For all other undelivered orders placed before June 24, delivery is similarly contingent on reaching a new agreement with the third-party logistics firm, which is an unsecured creditor of the insolvent Stax group.

    At this stage, the business is also unable to process any returns or exchanges for customers, and all unused gift cards and credit notes will not be accepted for future purchases. “We recognise how disappointing this will be for affected customers and we are sorry for the impact this has. Should this position change, we will provide updates promptly,” the statement read. As of the latest update, liquidators are continuing their assessment of the business’s remaining assets and creditor claims, with further updates expected as the wind-down process progresses.

  • Surprising new data reveals most financially confident generation

    Surprising new data reveals most financially confident generation

    Against a backdrop of ongoing national cost-of-living pressures and shifting economic expectations, new data from Australia’s MLC Real Retirement Report has upended common generational stereotypes, revealing that Generation Z is now the most financially confident cohort in the country — even as they report the highest levels of frustration with their current financial circumstances. The annual report, which surveys thousands of Australians to gauge attitudes toward workforce exit and long-term financial security, draws a nuanced picture of young Australians’ relationship with money: while systemic barriers and early career challenges leave many struggling to hit their savings targets, Gen Z is proactively taking control of their financial futures far earlier than previous generations.

    According to the report’s findings, 45% of Gen Z Australians report feeling confident or extremely confident in their personal financial knowledge, outpacing Millennials, Gen X and Baby Boomers by a clear margin. This confidence translates into forward-thinking planning: many Gen Z respondents already expect to retire as early as age 63, and are actively leveraging strategies to grow their retirement savings, including switching superannuation funds to access better returns or lower fees, using salary sacrificing to boost pre-tax contributions, and seeking professional financial guidance tailored to their long-term goals.

    Renee Howie, chief customer officer at MLC, attributed Gen Z’s distinct approach to financial planning to the unstable socio-economic environment they have come of age in. Rather than waiting for external systems or employers to secure their retirement, Howie explained, young Australians have embraced personal agency over the factors they can control, most notably their superannuation savings. “They’re not waiting for it to be done to them. They’re actually taking control and wanting to build their financial security for the future themselves,” Howie said in an interview. “There is a lot more control that they have in their super than they might have in other external factors that affect their financial capability today.”

    The report also identifies a major shift in core financial priorities for Gen Z: for the first time, financial freedom and retirement security have overtaken home ownership as the primary savings goal for many young Australians. Howie noted that this shift aligns with Gen Z’s focus on autonomy, explaining that financial independence is ultimately a goal centered on control over one’s own life and future. “It means that they have an interest, they’re planning for the long term, they’re making choices around their investments,” she said.

    Despite this unprecedented proactivity and confidence, the report also highlights significant challenges facing Gen Z on their path to a comfortable retirement. Only 45% of Gen Z respondents believe they are currently on track to meet their retirement goals, while just 30% have actually started putting aside dedicated retirement savings. Gen Z also reported higher levels of frustration with their current financial situation than any other generation, with 37% saying they feel held back by systemic cost-of-living pressures that make consistent saving difficult.

    Still, Howie struck an optimistic tone about Gen Z’s long-term prospects, pointing to the rise of financial influencers (or “finfluencers”) on social media and the expanded availability of free digital financial education tools as game-changing advantages for young people. These resources give Gen Z early access to money management skills that older generations often did not learn until mid-career, creating a foundation for healthy long-term saving habits. “Gen Z also get to see what their peers are doing through the likes of social channels, and so the education is leading them to consider their own circumstance,” Howie said. “Not only are they actively switching member funds, they’re also more predominantly going into products that enable them to have a little bit more control and a little bit more choice.”

  • Bunnings launches PowerPass Pro Rewards with fuel discounts, store credits and Qantas Points for tradies

    Bunnings launches PowerPass Pro Rewards with fuel discounts, store credits and Qantas Points for tradies

    In an aggressive push to capture a larger share of the business customer market, Australian and New Zealand hardware retail giant Bunnings has launched PowerPass Pro Rewards, the most comprehensive update to its trade-focused PowerPass loyalty program since 2011. The new tiered rewards scheme, tailored specifically for tradies and small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), introduces a multi-layered benefits package including in-store credits, fuel rebates, and access to Qantas frequent flyer points for qualifying members. The rollout marks one of the most substantial retail loyalty expansions targeting trade customers in the region in recent years.

    The program is structured around six ascending membership tiers: Member, Essential, Plus, Elite, Ultimate, and Black, with increasingly valuable benefits unlocked as members’ annual spending increases. Under the core earning structure, members collect Pro Rewards Dollars that can be redeemed for future purchases at Bunnings: customers who spend $2,000 receive $100 in store credit, with an additional $50 awarded for every extra $1,000 spent. Eligible members also gain access to discounted fuel rates via the Shell Card Lite platform, plus exclusive offers from program partners and a suite of digital business tools.

    Qantas Points, one of the program’s most high-value perks, are reserved for members in the top three tiers (Elite, Ultimate, Black), who can earn points through their existing Qantas Business Rewards memberships. A host of additional launch partners have signed on to the scheme beyond Qantas and Shell, including Commonwealth Bank, Ultra Tune, Zeller, Beaumont Tiles, InstantScripts, PointsBuild, and MYOB, expanding the range of extra benefits available to participating businesses.

    Bunnings Managing Director Mike Schneider explained that the full program redesign was driven by direct feedback from trade customers, who sought more than just point-of-sale discounts. “PowerPass Pro Rewards is about delivering greater value for our customers today, while creating a platform that allows us to better support them into the future,” Schneider said. “We’ve listened closely to our customers, who told us they wanted more than a discount at the register – they wanted to be recognised for their loyalty and rewarded in ways that genuinely support their business.” He added that the program is designed to deliver value that extends beyond on-the-job expenses: “With fuel discounts, travel rewards, Pro Rewards Dollars and benefits that grow over time, the program will help customers unlock more value from every dollar they spend and use it well beyond the job site.”

    The launch also introduces upgraded digital functionality within the existing PowerPass mobile app, allowing members to track their reward progress, spending, and available benefits in real time. Andrew Glance, Chief Executive of Qantas Loyalty and Customer, noted that trade and business customers in construction, repair, and maintenance are already among the most engaged users of Qantas Business Rewards. These groups typically earn 30% more Qantas Points on average than other business users, with most points accumulated through partnered on-the-ground spending like retail purchases. “Our member base is incredibly diverse, ranging from tech start-ups to family-owned construction companies, all looking for ways to reduce their operating costs,” Glance said. “We expect most business members will use the points earned at Bunnings to offset future travel costs, or to reward their hardworking employees.”

    To celebrate the nationwide launch, Bunnings will host the PowerPass Pro Challenge event at its Alexandria location in Sydney on Saturday, July 25. Around 60 participants will compete in a series of practical, trade-focused challenges – including a Scan & Go Sprint, toolbox and power tool assessment, paint race, Qantas travel challenge, and Shell Card obstacle course – with progressive eliminations leading to a final head-to-head round. Prizes include three $10,000 fuel vouchers and a collective pool of 900,000 Qantas Points for top competitors.

  • Volkswagen CEO looks to avoid plant closures as automaker moves to cut costs

    Volkswagen CEO looks to avoid plant closures as automaker moves to cut costs

    BERLIN – As one of the world’s largest automakers works to reverse slipping operational and financial performance, Volkswagen Group CEO Oliver Blume has firmly signaled that plant shutdowns are not on the table as part of the company’s ongoing restructuring efforts. In comments published Sunday by German newspaper Bild am Sonntag, Blume emphasized that more strategic alternatives exist compared to shuttering domestic facilities, amid growing market pressure and internal cost-reduction targets. Headquartered in Wolfsburg, Germany, Volkswagen currently navigates two major headwinds: mounting internal pressure to slash operational costs at its home base in Germany, and rapidly intensifying competition from local and global rivals in the high-value Chinese electric and internal combustion vehicle market. Just last week, the automaker announced that its three-year long “fundamental realignment” initiative has entered its next critical phase, revealing plans to cut its global model lineup by as much as 50 percent to streamline production and reduce overhead. The company did not release detailed breakdowns of which models would be cut, or what additional cost-cutting measures would be implemented, leaving industry analysts and stakeholders guessing about the future of several of Volkswagen’s German production facilities. “There are more intelligent solutions than closing plants,” Blume told the outlet. The CEO added that ongoing cost-reduction programs at Volkswagen’s German factories have already started delivering tangible results, noting that “we were able to improve our factory costs in Germany by an average 20% last year alone.” Blume characterized that 20 percent reduction as “strong progress” for the company’s restructuring goals. Blume also acknowledged that while consumer demand for Volkswagen’s broad portfolio of vehicles remains robust, the company’s profit margins on those products are far lower than leadership targets. “Volkswagen’s products are very popular, but we just earn too little money with them,” he explained. “So we must continue to reduce our costs. In all kinds of costs.” The comments come as global automakers across the industry face shifting consumer demand, rising raw material costs, and steep investment requirements for the transition to electric vehicles, forcing many legacy manufacturers to implement broad restructuring efforts to remain competitive.

  • Exclusive: Syria, Iraq and US plan to unveil Mediterranean pipeline deal to bypass Strait of Hormuz

    Exclusive: Syria, Iraq and US plan to unveil Mediterranean pipeline deal to bypass Strait of Hormuz

    A landmark transnational energy project is set to move forward after senior Iraqi and regional officials confirmed to Middle East Eye that Iraq, Syria and the United States have reached an agreement to reactivate the decades-old Kirkuk-Baniyas oil pipeline, a 500-mile corridor stretching from northern Iraq’s major oil fields to Syria’s Mediterranean coastline. The initiative is framed explicitly as a strategy to reduce Iraq’s overreliance on the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran has tightened control amid escalating regional tensions tied to the US-Israeli war. The formal unveiling of the agreement is scheduled for next week, during Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi’s upcoming visit to the White House for talks with US President Donald Trump, sources confirmed.

    Leading the behind-the-scenes negotiations on the US side is Tom Barrack, Trump’s ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria and Iraq, who has spent weeks ironing out project details ahead of Zaidi’s trip, which will also include a stop in Texas, America’s core energy production hub. Senior Iraqi sources tell MEE that Barrack has built a strong working partnership with Zaidi, and frames the pipeline project as a blueprint for future US-aligned commercial development across the Levant that would deliver mutual benefits to Washington and regional host governments.

    Originally completed in 1952 by the Iraq Petroleum Company, the pipeline was built to carry up to 300,000 barrels of crude oil per day. It was shut down by Baghdad in the 1980s after Syria aligned with Iran during the Iran-Iraq War, then suffered extensive damage following the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq, leaving it completely non-functional for decades.

    Extensive modernization and reconstruction work will be required to bring the corridor back online, including new storage infrastructure, upgraded pumping stations and replacement electrical systems. One senior regional official told MEE that a full, wholesale replacement of the aging pipeline is the most likely path forward, with a total construction timeline of two to three years. The official added that a consortium of US energy firms has already been assembled to lead the reconstruction effort, a clear signal of the US government’s commitment to advancing the project.

    Initial discussions between Baghdad and the new Syrian government to revive the pipeline first emerged in late 2024, shortly after Islamist militias loyal to Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa ousted long-time ruler Bashar al-Assad. Those early talks failed to gain sufficient momentum to move forward, until shifting regional dynamics created new urgency for the project.

    That urgency stems directly from Iran’s expanding control over the Strait of Hormuz amid the ongoing regional war. In recent months, Iraq has relied on small-scale crude exports via tanker trucks crossing into Syria, but volumes have been far too low to meet Baghdad’s revenue needs.

    “Iraq has started to see Syria in a different light,” independent Iraqi analyst Sarhang Hamasaeed told MEE. “Prior to the war, there was deep skepticism. The reality of the war made it clear that Iraq needs Syria as an alternative export route.”

    Regional sources confirm that Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani will travel to the US to attend the official signing ceremony for the pipeline agreement. The project comes amid a sweeping reset in US-Syria relations: after al-Sharaa toppled Assad, he aligned with Washington, and now enjoys strong backing from Turkey and Gulf powers including Qatar and Saudi Arabia. The Trump administration has already rolled back multiple layers of sanctions on Syria, including sanctions on al-Sharaa’s former rebel group Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which evolved from al-Qaeda’s former Syrian affiliate al-Nusra Front.

    Last week at a NATO summit in Ankara, Trump issued unusually public praise for al-Sharaa, calling him “fantastic” and “highly respected”. The US also announced last week it would remove Syria from its list of State Sponsors of Terrorism, a designation the country had held since 1979. The delisting clears a major regulatory hurdle for US firms to participate in the pipeline project.

    Earlier this month, the Iraqi government already approved a preliminary agreement for US firms Capital TI and Chevron, alongside a Qatari energy company, to explore development of both the original Kirkuk-Baniyas route and a second line from the Iraqi oil hub of Haditha in Anbar Province to Baniyas.

    For Iraq, the stakes of the project could not be higher. Roughly 95% of Iraq’s oil exports currently flow through the Strait of Hormuz, leaving the country extremely vulnerable to Iran’s chokehold on the waterway. Data from energy analytics firm Vortexa released last month shows that Iraq’s seaborne oil exports in May fell to just 8% of the 2024 average. With oil sales accounting for 90% of the Iraqi government’s annual budget, the disruption has created a severe fiscal crisis for Baghdad, making an alternative export route a matter of national economic survival.

    Baghdad’s ruling coalition is dominated by Shia political parties and militias with close ties to Iran, which have historically been wary of partnering with al-Sharaa, a Sunni leader with a history as a hardline Islamist insurgent. But the acute economic pressure from disrupted Hormuz exports has pushed Baghdad to prioritize the project despite internal opposition.

  • South Africa seeks tariff exemption as US probes forced labor tied to imports

    South Africa seeks tariff exemption as US probes forced labor tied to imports

    JOHANNESBURG – As tensions between the United States and South Africa continue to simmer over bilateral trade and foreign policy, Pretoria has formally pushed Washington to grant it an exemption from planned punitive tariffs tied to a sweeping U.S. trade probe into forced labor import bans across dozens of nations. South Africa’s core argument rests on its existing, robust legal framework that strictly bans the use of forced labor in domestic production and imports.

    This week, a high-level delegation from South Africa’s Department of Trade, Industry and Competition presented Pretoria’s case to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) in Washington D.C. The appearance comes as part of USTR’s ongoing Section 301 investigation, which assesses whether 60 major global economies enforce sufficient restrictions on imports of goods produced with forced labor.

    During the hearing, the South African delegation emphasized that the country has ratified all core International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions that prohibit forced labor. It also highlighted that Pretoria has already enacted domestic legislation granting law enforcement authorities the power to seize and block any imports manufactured through forced labor practices. Beyond that, South African law already explicitly bans the production of goods via prison labor, closing a key loophole that investigators often flag in other jurisdictions.

    The delegation made a specific push to block USTR’s proposed 12.5 percent tariff on South African exports to the United States, calling for full exemptions for the country’s most critical export sectors. These key goods include platinum group metals, passenger and commercial vehicles, citrus produce, seafood, wine, and tree nuts, with the delegation noting there is no credible evidence linking any of these products to forced labor.

    The request comes amid a period of growing friction in trade and diplomatic relations between Washington and Pretoria. Over the past several years, the two partners have faced repeated disagreements over existing tariffs, Pretoria’s domestic economic policies, and clashing stances on global conflicts – most recently the 2023-2024 war in Gaza.

    For decades, South Africa has enjoyed duty-free access to the huge U.S. consumer market under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a preferential trade program designed to boost economic development across sub-Saharan Africa. The initiative has supported billions of dollars in annual exports from the region, but its future remains uncertain as it is set to expire imminently without reauthorization from the U.S. Congress.

    South African Trade Minister Parks Tau reaffirmed that the United States remains one of South Africa’s most important trading partners, and that Pretoria will maintain constructive, ongoing engagement with Washington both on the Section 301 probe and other outstanding trade disputes. These include longstanding U.S. tariffs on South African steel, aluminum, and automobile exports.

    Following this week’s hearing, USTR has opened a window for additional public and official submissions, due by Thursday, before the agency moves to a final decision on the proposed tariffs and exemption requests.