分类: business

  • AliExpress fined record €550m by EU for allowing sale of illegal goods

    AliExpress fined record €550m by EU for allowing sale of illegal goods

    In a landmark enforcement of the European Union’s landmark Digital Services Act (DSA), Chinese e-commerce giant AliExpress has been issued a record €550 million penalty for systemic failures to stop the sale of counterfeit and unsafe products across its platform to millions of European consumers. The penalty, the largest ever handed down under the DSA, follows a two-year investigation that uncovered widespread gaps in AliExpress’s risk assessment and product compliance systems, regulators announced Wednesday.

    AliExpress, a subsidiary of Chinese tech conglomerate Alibaba, boasts 193 million monthly active users across the European Union — a larger user base than competing Chinese fast-fashion platforms Shein and Temu, according to EU data. The investigation concluded that the platform’s automated detection tools for illegal products failed to flag thousands of dangerous and counterfeit listings, while flagged items often remained active on the site for weeks before being removed. Regulators also found that AliExpress did not enforce meaningful penalties against third-party sellers offering illegal goods, and that basic compliance checks could be easily bypassed by bad actors.

    EU Digital Commissioner Henna Virkkunen emphasized that the circulation of harmful counterfeit goods is not an inevitable downside of e-commerce, but a direct result of AliExpress’s failure to meet its legal obligations under EU law. “The spread of counterfeit clothing, unsafe toys, dangerous cosmetics and other illegal and harmful products is not an unavoidable cost of shopping online — it is a failure by AliExpress to comply with its obligations,” Virkkunen said in a statement.

    The DSA, which went into full effect for large online platforms last year, requires major tech providers to implement rigorous due diligence to remove illegal and harmful content from their services, with maximum fines reaching 6% of a company’s global annual turnover. Alibaba reported €122 billion in global turnover last year, meaning the maximum possible fine could have exceeded €7 billion, making the €550 million penalty far lower than the allowed cap.

    AliExpress has pushed back against the ruling, calling the fine disproportionate and arguing that it does not reflect the proactive upgrades the company has already made to its compliance systems. “We disagree with today’s decision and the disproportionate fine, which does not adequately reflect our established framework and the significant, proactive enhancements we have made,” a company spokesperson said. The platform added that it is currently reviewing the commission’s ruling and evaluating all legal options to challenge the penalty. AliExpress is required to pay the fine and submit a corrective action plan addressing the identified breaches to the European Commission by October 20.

    This penalty marks the latest in a series of high-profile enforcement actions against large online platforms under the DSA. Earlier this year, competitor Temu was fined €200 million for failing to curb sales of unsafe children’s products, and last year Elon Musk’s social media platform X was hit with a €120 million fine over deceptive verification practices that exposed users to widespread scams.

  • EU hits AliExpress with a record 550 million-euro fine over unsafe and counterfeit goods

    EU hits AliExpress with a record 550 million-euro fine over unsafe and counterfeit goods

    BRUSSELS – In a landmark enforcement of the European Union’s landmark Digital Services Act (DSA), the European Commission announced Monday that it has issued a €550 million ($629 million) fine to Chinese e-commerce giant AliExpress, marking the largest penalty ever handed down for violations of the bloc’s sweeping digital regulation. The penalty comes on the heels of similar enforcement actions against other major platforms, setting a clear precedent for the EU’s aggressive crackdown on non-compliance by global online marketplaces operating in its single market.

    This latest fine follows a €200 million penalty issued to another China-based online retailer, Temu, just months prior, and a $120 million penalty imposed last year on X, the social media platform owned by Elon Musk, for failing to meet DSA obligations. For AliExpress, the penalty also arrives less than three weeks after its parent company, Chinese tech conglomerate Alibaba, agreed to pay $600 million to settle a long-running dispute with U.S. authorities over claims the firm facilitated the import and sale of illegal pharmaceuticals, controlled substances, regulated chemicals and pill-manufacturing equipment into the United States.

    European officials emphasized that the fine stems from AliExpress’s persistent failure to systematically curb the trade of dangerous and illicit goods on its platform, including counterfeit apparel, children’s toys that fail EU safety standards, toxic cosmetics, and a range of other prohibited products that put consumers at risk. Henna Virkkunen, the European Commission’s Executive Vice-President responsible for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, stated in an official release that the proliferation of these harmful goods is not an inevitable side effect of online commerce, but a direct result of AliExpress falling short of its mandatory obligations under the DSA.

    “Scale is not an excuse; risks must be identified and addressed systematically to ensure consumers can safely shop online,” Virkkunen said. “Today, we are holding AliExpress to this standard and request it to take urgent corrective action.”

    The commission’s investigation found that up until the bloc’s preliminary ruling in June 2024, AliExpress had not implemented sufficient safeguards to root out illegal and unsafe listings across its platform. While the company offered formal commitments to upgrade its compliance systems following the preliminary finding, the commission still moved forward with the full penalty to reflect the severity of the earlier non-compliance. AliExpress now faces an October 20 deadline to submit a detailed, actionable remediation plan outlining concrete steps it will take to address gaps in its systemic risk assessment and mitigation processes.

    Enshrined into EU law in 2022 and fully enforceable for major platforms since early 2024, the DSA is a landmark regulatory framework designed to protect digital users by forcing large online platforms to crack down on illegal and harmful content—ranging from dangerous counterfeit goods to incitement of violence and genocide—while upholding European citizens’ fundamental rights to privacy and free speech. The regulation requires very large online platforms, defined as those with more than 45 million monthly active users in the EU, to conduct regular mandatory risk assessments and implement targeted mitigation measures to address systemic harms tied to their services.

    In a written response emailed to the Associated Press following the announcement, AliExpress pushed back against the penalty, arguing it has made substantial proactive investments to align its operations with DSA requirements since the regulation entered into force. The company said it “has been, and continues to be, firmly committed to meeting our obligations and we have invested substantial resources in risk assessment and mitigation, product safety and consumer protection.”

    AliExpress rejected the fine as disproportionate, claiming it does not fairly reflect the compliance framework the company has already built, nor the significant upgrades it has already rolled out to strengthen safety protocols. “We are carefully reviewing the decision and considering all available options,” the company added, leaving the door open to an appeal of the penalty.

  • Mamamia appoints son of founder Mia Freedman as its new CEO

    Mamamia appoints son of founder Mia Freedman as its new CEO

    One of Australia’s biggest independent digital media companies, Mamamia, has ushered in a new era of leadership with the appointment of 28-year-old Luca Lavigne — the son of founder Mia Freedman — as its newest chief executive officer.

    Founded by Freedman in her own living room back in 2007, Mamamia has grown from a small personal project into one of the nation’s most prominent independent media voices focused on women’s content. Lavigne’s rise to the top role is not a sudden handout: he has worked his way up through every tier of the company over the past decade, starting his tenure as an 18-year-old intern straight out of school. After cutting his teeth across multiple departments, he stepped into the chief operating officer role just two years ago, and has now been promoted to the top spot vacated by outgoing CEO Nat Harvey, who departed Mamamia to take up a new leadership position at Southern Cross Media Group.

    The announcement of Lavigne’s appointment was made public during a recent episode of the Mumbrella podcast, where the new CEO opened up about his career trajectory, his connection to the company’s founding team, and his plans for the future. In a candid conversation, Lavigne first paid warm tribute to his predecessor, praising Harvey’s unmatched ability to inspire teams across the organization.

    “CEO really stands for chief energy officer, and Nat is the best example of that,” Lavigne said. “I’ve never met anyone who can get up in front of a group of people and inspire them as Nat can, and I’m going to miss that about her hugely.”

    Ahead of inevitable public and media scrutiny over his family ties to the company’s leadership — Freedman is his mother, and his father Jason Lavigne also serves as a company director — Lavigne was open about how he first joined the company, while pushing back against assumptions that his promotion was unearned. He acknowledged that his family connection gave him the initial foot in the door a decade ago, but emphasized that Mamamia’s culture does not allow leaders to rest on their family connections.

    “Let’s be honest about how I got in the door here 10 years ago, the co-founders and I go back a long time. We’ve known each other a while, I’m not going to insult anyone’s intelligence by pretending otherwise,” he joked. “What I do know is that Mamamia is not a place that you can coast.”

    Outgoing CEO Harvey also publicly defended Lavigne’s appointment, noting that his decade of hands-on experience, relentless work ethic, and proven contributions to the business leave no question about his suitability for the role. “There will be nobody in this business, certainly over the last 12 months, that would question Luca’s work ethic or contribution or ability to do the job,” she said.

    Reflecting on his rapid career progression, Lavigne noted that taking on senior roles earlier than the industry average has become a pattern for him: after starting at 18, he is now taking on the CEO role at 28, and just recently welcomed newborn twins, bringing his total number of children to three. “I found my first grey hair the other day, which I think says a lot about where I’m at in my life,” he joked. “I’ve also just had newborn twins, I’ve got three kids at home. So it seems to be a pattern in my life that I seem to do things a little early.”

  • Ryanair profits drop as Iran war puts off passengers and lifts fuel costs

    Ryanair profits drop as Iran war puts off passengers and lifts fuel costs

    Europe’s largest low-cost carrier Ryanair has reported a sharp 34% year-on-year drop in pre-tax profits for the first quarter of its financial year (April to June), as the resurgent conflict in the Middle East sends jet fuel costs soaring and sparks widespread consumer hesitation to book air travel in advance. The Irish airline posted pre-tax profits of €593 million (£503 million) for the three-month period, with overall revenue seeing almost no growth, edging up just 1% to €4.4 billion, as the carrier was forced to slash ticket prices to stimulate flagging demand amid geopolitical uncertainty.

  • Scott Pape has compared switching super strategies to a married man on Tinder

    Scott Pape has compared switching super strategies to a married man on Tinder

    Well-known Australian finance commentator Scott Pape, popularly known as the Barefoot Investor, has issued a sharp warning to Australian superannuation holders against making impulsive portfolio changes in response to viral market crash warnings, using a striking analogy to drive his point home. Pape’s comments came after a 42-year-old superannuation member, identified only as James, reached out for guidance following a high-profile podcast appearance from veteran investor Jeremy Grantham.

    Grantham, the British billionaire co-founder of global asset management firm GMO who built his reputation for correctly predicting both the 2000 dot-com collapse and the 2008 global financial crisis, recently appeared on *The Diary of a CEO* podcast. In that episode, titled “Billionaire’s WARNING: I’m SELLING. The Crash Is Already Here!”, Grantham doubled down on his long-held claim that the U.S. stock market is currently the largest investment bubble in American history. He predicted a catastrophic 70% downturn, dismissed cryptocurrency as worthless, and drew parallels between the ongoing artificial intelligence boom and the unsustainable dot-com bubble of the late 1990s.

    Alarmed by Grantham’s warnings, James told Pape he planned to reallocate his superannuation and personal investment holdings away from U.S. and Australian equities over fears of an imminent market collapse. Pape responded by acknowledging that he does not fault James for feeling anxious, but made clear he found the podcast itself reckless. Pape compared the clickbait-driven warning to a married man mindlessly swiping through dating app Tinder: a provocative act designed to spark unnecessary dissatisfaction with a stable, long-term arrangement in favor of a riskier, more glamorous alternative.

    “That podcast felt like the financial version of a married bloke on Tinder,” Pape wrote in his latest advisory post. “The whole thing is designed to make you restless and think ‘Maybe I should ditch my boring old index funds for some sexy emerging markets.’” He went on to dismiss the strategy of timing the market based on crash predictions as a “rubbish way to invest your money.”

    Notably, Pape conceded that he actually agrees with much of Grantham’s core analysis: U.S. and Australian equities do show signs of significant overvaluation right now. Where he disagrees sharply is with the advice for ordinary retail investors to sell their holdings and exit the market in anticipation of a crash. Pape pointed out that profiting from a market crash requires being correct not once, but twice: an investor must sell before the downturn hits, then correctly time their re-entry to buy back in at the bottom. That kind of consistent market timing is notoriously difficult even for professional investors, he argued.

    As evidence, Pape noted that Grantham has been labeling the U.S. stock market a bubble since 2021. In the years since his first warning, the S&P 500 has still surged more than 100%, leaving investors who followed his early advice out of the market and missing out on massive gains.

    For ordinary long-term investors like James, who is 42 and has decades of contributing to and growing his superannuation before retirement, Pape advocated for a “married to your portfolio” approach. He explained that he committed to his own diversified holdings years ago, vowing to stick with them through both market booms and corrections. Historical data, he noted, consistently shows that equities deliver stronger long-term returns than any other major asset class, even with periodic steep crashes.

    “Every crash has eventually been followed by new highs,” Pape said. “So I keep a few months’ cash in the bank and accept that happily ever after only exists in fairy tales.” His advice to James and other anxious Australian superannuation holders is straightforward: stay committed to a diversified long-term equity portfolio, keep a cash buffer to avoid being forced to sell during a downturn, and avoid the hype-driven “spicy dating apps” of viral market crash predictions.

  • South Korea’s Kospi drops nearly 5% as some AI stocks swoon, while oil keeps climbing

    South Korea’s Kospi drops nearly 5% as some AI stocks swoon, while oil keeps climbing

    On a trading day marked by dual market shocks from geopolitical risk and profit-taking in the booming technology sector, most major Asian equity benchmarks booked modest gains on Monday, but South Korea’s benchmark Kospi index plummeted nearly 5% amid a widespread selloff of artificial intelligence-linked stocks.

    Japanese financial markets remained closed for a national holiday, leaving regional trading without one of its largest liquidity providers, while U.S. equity futures pointed to a mixed opening following last week’s broad downturn. The most dramatic market movement came outside of equities, however, as oil prices surged more than 2% following nine consecutive nights of U.S. military strikes in the Middle East, with escalating exchanges of attacks between Washington and Tehran pushing the two nations closer to full-scale open conflict.

    By early Monday trading, international benchmark Brent crude climbed 2.6% to settle at $90.40 per barrel, crossing the key $90 threshold that has not been hit in recent months. U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude rose 2.2% to reach $83.58 per barrel. Commodities strategists Warren Patterson and Ewa Manthey of ING warned in a client note on Monday that ongoing tit-for-tat strikes between the U.S. and Iran have already produced heavy casualties on both sides, and unconstrained escalation could trigger a wave of large-scale attacks across the Persian Gulf that would upend global energy supplies.

    The analysts added that commercial tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most critical chokepoint for global oil shipments that carries roughly a fifth of the world’s daily oil consumption, has already slowed to a near standstill, creating immediate upward pressure on energy prices across the board.

    The selloff in AI-linked equities hit South Korea particularly hard, as the Kospi has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the multi-year global AI investment boom. The index sank 4.9% to close at 6,490.97, with two of its largest market capitalization stocks leading the downturn: Samsung Electronics dropped 4.4%, while major memory chip manufacturer SK Hynix declined 3.3%.

    In Taiwan, another market heavily weighted toward AI and semiconductor stocks, the Taiex index posted a marginal loss of less than 0.1% in a far milder downturn. A notable bright spot in the region was leading chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC), which climbed 2% following a 7.3% drop on Friday. The Friday dip came after TSMC announced plans to invest an extra $100 billion to expand chip manufacturing capacity across the United States.

    Elsewhere in Asia, the picture was far more positive. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index gained 2.1% to close at 25,105.78, while mainland China’s Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.2% to 3,808.39. Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 notched a small 0.2% gain to 8,815.30, while India’s Sensex bucked the regional upward trend to slip 0.9%.

    The current wave of AI stock selling originated on global markets last Friday, when chip and AI-related equities dropped sharply that pulled major global benchmarks lower. Investor jitters have grown in recent weeks as massive new capital expenditure pledges for AI expansion have fueled fears that the sector may be entering an asset price bubble, prompting many institutional and retail investors to sell positions to lock in profits after months of strong double-digit gains.

    Market sentiment was further shaken last week by the launch of a new high-powered Chinese AI model from Beijing-based technology firm Moonshot AI. The release of the Kimi K3 open-source AI model mirrored the market impact of the so-called “DeepSeek moment” that rattled global equity markets in early 2025. The new model is seen as further evidence that lower-cost, high-capability Chinese AI developers are increasingly gaining market share at the expense of Western rivals including Anthropic’s Claude and OpenAI’s GPT series.

    The downturn in AI equities spilled over into Wall Street at the end of last week, with the benchmark S&P 500 closing the week down 1% at 7,457.69. The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 0.8% to end at 52,146.42, while the technology-heavy Nasdaq composite dropped 1.4% to 25,520.24. Leading U.S. chip stocks all posted losses: AI chip giant Nvidia fell 2.2%, while Broadcom and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) each dropped 1%.

    Separately, SpaceX, Elon Musk’s commercial rocket company, dropped 5.4% to fall below its $135 per share initial public offering price, hitting its lowest level since the stock began public trading on the Nasdaq last month.

    In currency markets, movements were relatively muted: the U.S. dollar edged slightly lower to 162.37 Japanese yen from 162.43 yen in prior trading, while the euro appreciated marginally to $1.1446, up from $1.1438.

  • Collapses retailer Stax leaves staff, ATO and creditors reeling with $6.7m in losses

    Collapses retailer Stax leaves staff, ATO and creditors reeling with $6.7m in losses

    Once a rising competitor to global athletic wear leaders Lululemon, Nike, and Adidas, Australian activewear brand Stax has left behind more than $6.7 million in unpaid debts after its sudden collapse this year, new regulatory filings have confirmed. The brand’s rapid downward spiral began in June, when National Australia Bank pushed the retailer into receivership amid growing financial pressure. In a last-ditch effort to keep the business operating, founders Don Robertson and Matilda Murray sold off the company’s retail store network and their personal luxury vehicles, including a Lamborghini and a Porsche, the effort ultimately failed. By mid-July, Stax formally entered voluntary administration, bringing its decade-long growth story to an abrupt end.

    New documents lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the country’s corporate regulator, have laid bare the full scale of the company’s unpaid obligations ahead of its collapse. Of the total $6.7 million debt, more than $450,000 is owed directly to former Stax employees. One single staff member is owed nearly $78,600 in unpaid wages and entitlements, which break down into $89,209 in unused annual leave, $31,343 in long service leave, $63,556 in unpaid superannuation contributions, and $128,683 in promised redundancy payments across the entire workforce.

    Beyond unpaid staff wages, unsecured creditors hold almost $6.3 million in outstanding claims from the failed retailer. Major domestic and international entities are among those waiting for repayment. Shopping centre operator Scentre Group, which manages Australia’s Westfield shopping centre portfolio, is owed more than $500,000 in unpaid rent for Stax outlets across New South Wales, including locations in Miranda, Liverpool and central Sydney. Other major retail landlords Highpoint, Karrinyup and Pacific Fair also hold unpaid claims, alongside contractors Affective Building Services and Flow Logistics. Google Australia is owed roughly $500,000 for digital advertising and business services provided to the brand. Two Chinese manufacturers — Jiaxing Sky Air Sports and Ningbo Mingna Garments — hold the largest individual claims, owed more than $1 million and $1.9 million respectively in unpaid production fees. The Australian Taxation Office is also outstanding $123,858 in business activity statement payments.

    The current debt figures are drawn from director filings submitted to ASIC, and administrators note that final totals may shift once liquidators deliver their conclusive report in the coming weeks.

    Last week, the Stax founders broke their months-long silence on the collapse in a public statement posted to social media, acknowledging widespread customer anger over unfilled orders. “First and foremost, we’re truly sorry for this and for not communicating earlier,” the pair wrote. “Stax was built over more than a decade with an incredible community and knowing that so many of our customers have been impacted is something we carry every day.” They added that with the business now under the control of receivers, customers with outstanding orders will need to follow the formal insolvency process to seek resolutions. “I know that doesn’t change the frustration or disappointment so many of you are feeling,” the statement said. “If you placed an order and haven’t received it, we completely understand why you’re upset.”

    Founded in 2015 and formally registered in Western Australia in 2017, Stax grew from a small grassroots startup to become a major player in the highly competitive Australian activewear market. At its peak of operations, the brand recorded more than $30 million in annual turnover and employed a workforce of 160 people across its retail and head office operations.

  • Russians turn to cash, putting more strain on slowing wartime economy

    Russians turn to cash, putting more strain on slowing wartime economy

    More than four years into Russia’s ongoing conflict with Ukraine, a dramatic shift toward cash transactions is sweeping the country, driven by two interconnected forces: repeated mobile internet shutdowns ordered to counter Ukrainian drone strikes, and growing numbers of businesses turning to off-the-books operations to survive mounting financial and tax pressures.

    New analysis of Russian Central Bank data conducted by the BBC reveals that the nation has injected 1.56 trillion roubles (equivalent to $20 billion or £14.8 billion) into cash circulation since the start of 2026. This marks the largest first-half increase in cash supply outside the acute disruption of the Covid-19 pandemic, underscoring the scale of the current trend.

    The immediate trigger for the latest spike in cash demand has been a series of widespread mobile internet outages implemented by the Kremlin to disrupt Ukrainian drone operations. Without stable connectivity, digital card payments and mobile transactions frequently fail, leaving millions of consumers unable to complete purchases unless they have physical banknotes on hand. For many ordinary Russians, holding cash has become a simple hedge against the uncertainty of wartime life. “Having cash on hand gives you some sense of control and security,” a Moscow resident, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the BBC. “If there’s an emergency in the city, I know I’ll still be able to buy basic necessities, even if the mobile network goes down.”

    This is not the first time cash withdrawals have surged during the war. Previous spikes occurred after President Vladimir Putin announced partial mobilization in September 2022, and again during the short-lived Wagner mercenary group mutiny in June 2023, as Russians rushed to build a financial buffer against chaos. What makes the current shift unique is its lasting impact on state finances, coming at a moment when the Kremlin is already grappling with a widening budget deficit and urgently needs additional revenue to fund its military campaign in Ukraine.

    While Russia’s oil and gas sector – which generates roughly a quarter of all state revenue – has seen a short-term boost from rising global oil prices following the Iran conflict, the broader domestic economy is slowing sharply. In May 2026, the Russian Ministry of Economy downgraded its full-year GDP growth forecast to just 0.4%, which would be the weakest annual expansion the country has seen since 2022.

    To close the budget gap, the Kremlin implemented a controversial tax hike in January 2026, raising the standard value-added tax (VAT) from 20% to 22% and lowering the income threshold that requires small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to pay the tax. The change has squeezed already thin profit margins for countless small businesses, pushing many toward informal cash operations to underreport their income and avoid the full tax burden.

    From neighborhood pharmacies and family restaurants to beauty salons and local corner shops, more merchants are now encouraging customers to pay with cash to keep transactions off official books. “Stalls at our market have been closing one after another because it’s no longer profitable to stay open,” said the owner of a small clothing boutique at a market in Pskov, a western Russian city. “Most of those still trading ask customers to pay in cash whenever they can, so less money goes through the till.”

    The trend extends even to employee wages. Taras Skvortsov, chief financial officer of Sberbank, Russia’s largest financial institution, warned in a recent June 2026 address that there are “very serious signs” of a rise in under-the-table “envelope wages” that avoid payroll tax. Cited by Russian state news agency Interfax, Skvortsov noted: “We are not seeing cash return to the banking system through cash collection, ATMs or self-service terminals. It is staying in people’s hands.”

    A May 2026 survey conducted by Opora Russia, the country’s largest small business association, found that roughly 6% of entrepreneurs have already adopted “grey economy” schemes to cope with the new higher tax burden, including skipping official cash register receipts. For businesses, cash transactions allow them to underreport total turnover to remain below the mandatory VAT threshold, while unreported cash wages cut their payroll tax obligations.

    The growing shadow economy puts the Kremlin in a contradictory position. Cracking down on informal activity has been a top policy priority for the Russian government: before the VAT hike took effect, Putin publicly warned that the new rules must not push businesses into the informal sector, and called for a “radical reduction in illegal employment.”

    Analysts point out that the Kremlin’s own policies are working at cross-purposes. “One arm of the government is trying to squeeze as much money as possible out of people through higher taxes, fines and other charges,” said Alexander Kolyandr, non-resident senior fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis. “But another, in trying to counter so-called terrorist threats, is undermining that strategy by making it harder to collect tax,” he explained, referencing the routine mobile internet shutdowns that have made digital payments unreliable.

    Even with the Central Bank holding interest rates high to combat war-driven inflation – offering double-digit returns on bank deposits that should incentivize keeping money in accounts – the old Soviet-era habit of holding cash “under the mattress” is making a rapid comeback. Sberbank currently offers a 10% annual interest rate on 100,000-rouble one-year fixed deposits, yet Central Bank data shows that Russians withdrew 550 billion roubles from bank accounts in May 2026 alone, including 200 billion roubles from fixed-term savings products.

    For consumers, the shift is also being driven by businesses offering incentives for cash payments. Anton, a Moscow-based copywriter, told the BBC he recently received a discount for paying cash at a local vinyl record shop, with the vendor openly citing higher taxes as the reason. During the heightened security and mobile internet shutdowns around Russia’s May Victory Day celebrations, Anton said he witnessed widespread disruption at a central Moscow flower market, where customers scrambled to find working ATMs that still had cash available. “There was a woman going from one ATM to another, looking for one that still had banknotes,” he recalled.

  • Perth and Adelaide dominate list of Australia’s next million-dollar suburbs

    Perth and Adelaide dominate list of Australia’s next million-dollar suburbs

    Australia’s property market is shifting in unexpected ways, with two mid-sized capital cities outpacing the country’s traditional high-price hubs to top a new forecast of suburbs poised to hit a $1 million average house price within the next 12 months.

    Leading national real estate network Ray White Group conducted the targeted analysis to identify upcoming seven-figure suburbs, setting specific criteria for inclusion: neighborhoods must hold at least 2,500 existing homes, currently have an average property value between $900,000 and $1 million, and record enough annual price growth to cross the $1 million threshold in the coming year. Analysts also filtered out suburbs where investor ownership exceeds 19 percent to focus on owner-occupier focused markets.

    Contrary to long-held market expectations that link million-dollar price tags almost exclusively to Sydney and Melbourne, the final list is overwhelmingly dominated by suburbs from Perth and Adelaide. Nine of the 13 identified suburbs are located across Perth’s growing outer corridors, including High Wycombe, Marangaroo, Yangebup, Forrestfield-Wattle Grove, Wanneroo-Sinagra, Huntingdale-Southern River, Ballajura, Casuarina-Wandi and Hocking-Pearsall. Three Adelaide suburbs made the cut: Shadow Park-Trott Park, McLaren Vale and Golden Grove, while Darwin’s Howard Springs rounded out the ranking.

    Atom Go Tian, an economist with Ray White Group, explained that two key factors are driving the unexpected result. First, Perth and Adelaide are simply playing catch-up after years of lagging behind the east coast’s major property markets. Second, post-pandemic shifts in work and lifestyle priorities have reshaped where homebuyers are choosing to put down roots.

    “With far more flexible remote working arrangements now standard across many industries, there is far less pressure for Australians to live in the expensive major hubs of Sydney and Melbourne,” Go Tian noted. He added that the absence of Sydney and Melbourne suburbs from the list is not a sign of stagnation: most suburbs in those cities have already crossed the $1 million average price threshold, while any remaining affordable pockets tend to have higher investor ownership that excludes them from the study’s criteria.

    Go Tian also explained the geographic pattern within the two leading cities: inner-city suburbs in both Perth and Adelaide have already hit seven-figure price points, so growth is now pushing outward into historically affordable outer suburban areas. That trend is visible in Perth’s sprawling outer growth corridors and Adelaide’s southern and northern suburban belts, where all three of the city’s ranked suburbs are located.

    Western Australian property experts say Perth’s strong showing on the list comes as no surprise, pointing to years of consistent incremental growth that has put the market on this trajectory. Suzanne Brown, president of the Real Estate Institute of Western Australia (REIWA), described the growth across Perth’s broader suburban areas as “incredible” in recent years.

    “Perth has offered really strong property value for buyers in recent years – we have a beautiful state with a high quality of life that more people are discovering,” Brown said. She noted that Perth’s market hit a historic low point more than a decade ago, and has been steadily catching up to other capital city markets ever since. Brown also pointed to Western Australia’s long-term political stability as a draw for buyers, contrasting it with frequent changes to property tax and policy in other states like Victoria that have created uncertainty for local homeowners and investors.

    Brown echoed Go Tian’s observation that the Covid-19 pandemic unlocked permanent shifts in where Australians want to live. “Perth and Adelaide are both fantastic places to call home, and since the pandemic, more people have the flexibility to choose that,” she said. “If your role allows remote work, you don’t have to live in Melbourne to work for a Melbourne-based company anymore.”

    For homebuyers and investors watching the Australian market, the forecast signals a broader rebalancing of property prices across the country, as more affordable lifestyle-focused capital cities gain traction with a new generation of buyers reshaping market trends.

  • Australia’s iconic Ettamogah Pub near Albury is back on the market with a $7.5 million asking price

    Australia’s iconic Ettamogah Pub near Albury is back on the market with a $7.5 million asking price

    One of Australia’s most iconic and visually recognizable hospitality venues has hit the market for the second time in less than 12 months, this time with a dramatically reduced asking price that signals a shift in the property’s sales strategy.

    Nestled in Table Top, a small community just outside the regional city of Albury in New South Wales, the Ettamogah Pub stands out as one of the country’s most unusual and beloved tourist landmarks. Its one-of-a-kind cartoon-inspired design has drawn generations of visitors: the venue features deliberately uneven, wonky walls, a curved bull-nosed veranda, and a fully restored 1927 Chevrolet vintage truck permanently mounted atop its bright red roof – features that have turned it into a must-stop destination for road-trippers and cartoon fans across the nation.

    The story of the pub stretches back more than six decades. The original Ettamogah Pub cartoon concept was created by Ken Maynard, a former police officer turned cartoonist. The gag comic ran for nearly 50 years, featuring regularly in the weekly Australasian Post from the 1960s until the publication ceased operations in 2002, after making its first debut in 1959. When the pub was constructed in 1987 as a purpose-built tourist attraction, developers brought Maynard’s whimsical drawings to life, integrating all the iconic cartoon details into the venue’s architecture to match his vision of a quirky, outback-style community pub.

    The property first went up for sale in late 2025 with an ambitious $50 million price tag that included all intellectual property and global branding rights for the Ettamogah Pub concept. That offering failed to attract a buyer willing to meet the asking price, leading the current owner to restructure the sale. Now, the freehold going concern of the venue is back on the market with an asking price of just $7.5 million, a figure that reflects the narrower scope of the current listing.

    “The owner is focusing on selling the hotel and he’s probably seeking interest of seven and a half-million dollars,” Leon Alaban, the listing agent from global real estate services firm Savills, told Commercial Real Estate in an interview.

    The 4.81-hectare freehold site included in the current listing covers more than just the original public bar. The property also features a separate dedicated dining bar, multiple vacant retail shop spaces, and a large recreational oval, giving new owners room to expand or redevelop the venue to meet modern tourist demand.