作者: admin

  • Dozens of Stanford grads walk out on Google CEO’s speech

    Dozens of Stanford grads walk out on Google CEO’s speech

    In a striking display of public dissent that has drawn widespread attention, dozens of graduating students from Stanford University walked out of the commencement speech delivered by Google’s CEO mid-address. The demonstration, captured on camera by BBC journalists, saw protesters leave the ceremony venue carrying handcrafted signs that highlighted their deep unease over Google’s controversial partnership with the United States government.

    The walkout, which unfolded in front of thousands of fellow graduates, guests, and university faculty, spotlights growing tension between big tech firms and younger tech professionals over the ethical implications of corporate work for government agencies. Critics of the partnership have raised a range of concerns, from questions about data privacy and civil liberties to the potential misuse of artificial intelligence and other Google technologies in government programs. Many of the protesting students, who are set to join the tech workforce in the coming months, say they cannot in good conscience stay silent while their future industry leader engages in work they view as ethically compromised.

    This demonstration is not an isolated incident: in recent years, Google employees and student tech groups have repeatedly organized walkouts and petitions to protest the company’s business decisions, from workplace inequality to international government contracts. Monday’s walkout at one of the world’s most prestigious universities signals that this grassroots opposition within the tech community continues to gain traction, even as the company maintains its government partnerships and defends its policy decisions.

  • Russia was behind arson attacks targeting PM, BBC reveals

    Russia was behind arson attacks targeting PM, BBC reveals

    A months-long open-source investigation by the BBC has uncovered damning new evidence linking a series of arson attacks targeting properties connected to UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to an extensive, state-aligned Russian campaign of sabotage, division and provocation on British soil.

    The plot unraveled hours after 22-year-old Ukrainian builder Roman Lavrynovych set fire to the entrance of Starmer’s former home – a property rented to the prime minister’s sister-in-law after his move to Downing Street. Lavrynovych, who was recruited remotely via the messaging app Telegram by an anonymous handler going by the initials EL, was arrested within hours of the attack. In pre-arrest messages, EL, who had already promised Lavrynovych thousands of dollars in payment and Russian citizenship for carrying out attacks, urged him to flee the city immediately after the arson.

    The BBC’s investigation has traced EL’s identity to 23-year-old Evgeny Lyukshin, a young Russian diplomat-in-training and the son of a senior Russian foreign ministry official. Multiple lines of open-source evidence tie Lyukshin directly to the campaign: his initials match the handler’s alias, he appears in official Russian foreign ministry photos alongside top diplomatic leadership, he studied information warfare at a Kremlin-run training program taught by veteran Russian spies, and he was a core administrator for multiple Russian-backed fake extremist channels operating in the UK. When contacted by the BBC with the full body of evidence linking him to the plot, Lyukshin did not respond. Within hours, multiple channels linked to Lyukshin – including a disinformation outlet tied to the sanctioned Russian media network Rybar – disappeared from Telegram, and an official photo of Lyukshin with Russia’s deputy foreign minister was removed from a Russian state media website.

    The arson attacks on Starmer’s properties are just one small piece of a far larger campaign, the investigation found. Russian operatives led by Lyukshin built a network of completely fake extremist groups online, designed to stoke intercommunal division and fear among British communities. The first of these, the bogus Takbir Foundation, posed as an extremist Islamic organization that paid non-Muslim artists to spray Islamic graffiti on public British buildings – a deliberate ploy to inflame far-right anger. The second, Direct Action UK, was framed as a homegrown British far-right group that paid vulnerable job seekers to carry out Islamophobic vandalism against mosques and Islamic schools across London. Between autumn 2024, when the group launched after the Southport riots, and the arson attacks on Starmer’s properties, at least six London mosques and one Islamic school were vandalized under Direct Action’s direction, with the group sharing clips of the attacks online to amplify fear.

    Crucially, neither group had any genuine grassroots support in the UK. Both were entirely constructed by Russian operatives working remotely from Moscow. Metadata from posts in the Direct Action UK Telegram channel carried Moscow timestamps, used Cyrillic typography conventions, and placed currency symbols at the end of numerical values – a formatting quirk unique to Russian language use. Extremist content from the group was amplified by far-right British figures like Tommy Robinson, who was knowingly or unknowingly used to spread Russian-aligned disinformation. Even the false narrative that the Starmer arson suspects were sex workers tied to a personal scandal for the prime minister was spread by Robinson, before being reposted by a senior Putin administration envoy.

    Two leading UK anti-hate organizations – Hope Not Hate and Tell Mama – warned counter-terrorism police about the Russian links to Direct Action UK months before the arson attacks on Starmer’s properties, but neither received any meaningful follow-up. Nick Lowles, CEO of Hope Not Hate, told the BBC his organization received no response at all after submitting a full report. Tell Mama CEO Iman Atta added that Muslim communities had been left vulnerable by authorities’ failure to act on the warnings, noting that what began as online disinformation quickly escalated to on-the-ground criminal violence.

    A recent trial at the Old Bailey resulted in convictions for Lavrynovych and 27-year-old Stanislav Carpiuc, a Ukrainian-born Romanian national, on charges of conspiracy to commit arson. A third defendant, 35-year-old Petro Pochynok, was acquitted. The trial deliberately avoided any mention of the handler’s ties to Russia, focusing solely on the alleged financial motive for the attacks. The Metropolitan Police, which is currently investigating seven anti-Muslim hate crime incidents linked to Direct Action UK, has said it has no conclusive evidence of state backing for the plot, but multiple senior UK and Ukrainian sources have confirmed to the BBC that authorities have privately concluded the Russian state is behind the campaign.

    This operation fits a long-established pattern of Russian hybrid warfare across Europe and North America, where Russian operatives recruit vulnerable young people – often displaced Ukrainians – as proxy actors to carry out low-level criminal attacks. Senior Ukrainian investigator Vitaliy Sova told the BBC that a recent joint EU-Ukraine operation uncovered a Russian sabotage network operating in 11 countries including the UK, with roughly a third of recruited proxies being Ukrainian nationals. The tactic allows Russia to discredit Ukraine in the eyes of Western allies while maintaining plausible deniability for its own actions.

    Lyukshin’s training places him directly at the heart of the Kremlin’s modern information warfare apparatus. He is a graduate of a two-year-old information warfare program created on the direct orders of the Kremlin, jointly run by Putin’s presidential administration and sanctioned Putin ally Andrey Sushentsov. The program’s teaching staff includes veteran Russian spies: Andrey Bezrukov, a deep-cover spy who operated in the US for decades under a stolen Canadian identity before being uncovered in 2010, and Sergey Nalobin, a former Russian embassy London official widely accused of espionage activity.

    Former UK Conservative Defence Secretary Ben Wallace, who oversaw the British government’s response to the 2018 Salisbury nerve agent attack, said the targeting of the UK prime minister’s property marks a deliberate escalation of Russian aggression against Britain. “This would not have just come from a low-level individual, it would have come from the very top,” Wallace told the BBC.

    The Russian embassy has denied all allegations of involvement, saying in a statement that Russia “poses no threat to the United Kingdom or its people and harbours no aggressive intentions towards Britain.”

    Anyone with additional information on the campaign can contact the BBC Investigations team via email or anonymous secure whistleblowing tool SecureDrop.

  • Fox to buy Roku streaming firm in $22bn deal

    Fox to buy Roku streaming firm in $22bn deal

    Media conglomerate Fox has announced a transformative acquisition agreement that will see it take over streaming infrastructure firm Roku in a deal valued at $22 billion, a move that industry analysts say will reshape the competitive landscape of the United States television sector. When the merger is finalized, the combined entity is projected to rank as the third-largest TV provider in the U.S. by total audience viewership share, according to statements from both companies.

    Under the terms of the offer, Fox will pay Roku shareholders $160 per share, with compensation structured as a mix of cash and publicly traded Fox stock, the firms confirmed. This deal marks the latest step in Fox’s years-long strategic shift to adapt to shifting consumer behavior, as millions of viewers continue to migrate from traditional cable and broadcast television to internet-based streaming platforms.

    Lachlan Murdoch, chief executive officer of Fox, framed the acquisition as a natural progression of the company’s carefully cultivated strategy that has been in motion for nearly 10 years. “Back in 2019, we intentionally reoriented the entire company around live news and live sports content, two categories that remain the most consistent drivers of live viewership in the modern media ecosystem,” Murdoch explained in a statement announcing the deal. “Then in 2020, we completed our acquisition of ad-supported streaming service Tubi, and under our ownership and operational leadership, Tubi has grown to become one of the most successful streaming businesses in the industry. Today, we take the next logical step: bringing together the most valuable portfolio of live content in American video consumption with the leading streaming platform that millions of U.S. households already use to access their favorite content.”

    Industry observers have characterized the acquisition as a calculated bet that merging Roku’s popular streaming distribution platform with Fox’s extensive library of high-demand live news and sports content will leave the combined company well-positioned to capture growing market share in the fast-evolving streaming-first TV landscape. The merger comes as traditional media companies across the U.S. continue to consolidate and rework their business models to compete with large, deep-pocketed streaming giants that have come to dominate much of the global streaming market in recent years.

  • South Korea’s Starbucks to shut for staff history lesson after backlash

    South Korea’s Starbucks to shut for staff history lesson after backlash

    South Korea’s Starbucks franchise has announced an unprecedented nationwide early closure of all its retail locations next week, a direct response to widespread public fury sparked by a tone-deaf promotional campaign that coincided with the anniversary of the 1980 Gwangju Uprising, a defining pro-democracy movement bloodily suppressed by the country’s former military dictatorship.

    The ill-fated promotion, labeled “Tank Day,” centered on the launch of new “Tank Series” reusable tumblers marketed for their large volume, and it launched on the very date that South Koreans commemorate the 1980 crackdown, in which military forces deployed by authoritarian ruler Chun Doo-hwan killed at least 165 unarmed civilian protesters — many locals and historians believe the actual death toll is far higher. Subsequent official investigations have also confirmed that troops carried out widespread indiscriminate beatings, torture, and sexual violence against civilians during the crackdown, a trauma the nation has only slowly reckoned with in recent decades.

    The Gwangju Uprising stands as a cornerstone of South Korea’s modern democratic journey: it became a unifying rallying point for pro-democracy activists over seven years, ultimately leading to the mass 1988 June Democracy Movement that ended Chun’s 8-year authoritarian rule. Chun was later convicted of treason and corruption in 1996, received a presidential pardon, and died in 2021 at age 90. In recent years, formal acts of accountability have included a 2018 government apology to survivors of sexual violence committed by troops, and a public apology this year from Chun’s own grandson, Chun Woo-won, who called his grandfather a “sinner and slaughterer” and expressed remorse for the delayed apology to victims’ families.

    Beyond the insensitive “Tank Day” name, which echoed the military tanks deployed to crush the uprising, critics also flagged a second problematic slogan used in the campaign: the Korean phrase “tak on the table,” which uses the word “tak” that is identical to the term used in a controversial 1987 police statement about the death of a student activist in custody. The franchise later confirmed that marketing teams selected the slogan after relying on an AI tool for creative suggestions.

    The backlash erupted rapidly last month, drawing condemnation from all corners of South Korean society. President Lee Jae Myung publicly called out the campaign as “inhumane and disgraceful” on social media, while consumer advocates organized boycotts that led to protests outside Starbucks locations across the country and a reported steep drop in sales for the chain.

    In the immediate wake of the scandal, Shinsegae Group, which holds the licensing agreement to operate Starbucks in South Korea, terminated the contract of the franchise’s national chief executive. Now, the company has announced sweeping corrective measures to address the public outrage. Starting this Monday, all Starbucks Korea employees will complete mandatory training focused on historical awareness and social sensitivity through educational video content. Next Wednesday, all locations across the country will close at 3 p.m. local time (6 a.m. GMT) for three hours of in-person historical education, and will not reopen until the following day. The company confirmed that Shinsegae Group Chairman Chung Yong-jin will personally participate in the mandatory training alongside frontline staff. This marks the first time Starbucks Korea has ordered a nationwide early closure of all stores since the brand first entered the South Korean market in 1999.

    In an initial statement after the scandal broke, the franchise offered a vague apology for “inconvenience and concern” caused to customers, but the sweeping new measures signal how seriously the company is taking the public backlash over its failure to recognize the sensitive historical context of the promotion.

  • The UK is banning children’s social media use. Here’s what other countries are doing

    The UK is banning children’s social media use. Here’s what other countries are doing

    In a landmark policy shift aimed at shielding young people from harmful online content and the risks of prolonged screen time, the United Kingdom has announced plans to prohibit all individuals under the age of 16 from accessing a suite of major social media platforms, including Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube.

    This move places the UK at the forefront of a growing international push to enforce age-based access controls for social media, a trend that has sparked intense debate across stakeholder groups. While many parents and child protection organizations have praised the new restrictions as a much-needed step to safeguard vulnerable youth, critics have raised two core concerns: the policies are largely unworkable in practice, and they carry significant risks to user privacy that have not been adequately addressed.

    To contextualize the UK’s new policy, a global scan of similar regulatory efforts reveals a coordinated wave of action targeting minor’s social media access:

    **Australia**
    Australia pioneered one of the world’s most sweeping nationwide under-16 social media bans when it rolled out its policy last December. The regulation bars users under 16 from holding accounts on 10 major platforms, covering Facebook, Instagram, Kick, Reddit, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube, and Twitch. Non-compliant tech firms face maximum fines of 49.5 million Australian dollars, equivalent to roughly 35 million U.S. dollars. To date, no penalties have been issued, but the Australian government reports that platforms have already closed nearly 5 million accounts confirmed to belong to underage users.

    **Indonesia**
    Back in March, Indonesian authorities unveiled their own restrictions, barring users under 16 from creating accounts on a wide range of platforms deemed to carry risks of addiction, pornography, online scams, and cyberbullying. The prohibited platforms include major global services such as YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, Bigo Live, and the popular gaming platform Roblox.

    **Malaysia**
    Malaysia’s regulatory framework requires all social media platforms with at least 8 million active domestic users — including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube — to implement mandatory age verification systems and block under-16 users from registering new accounts. Companies that fail to meet the requirements face financial penalties of up to 10 million Malaysian ringgit, or approximately 2.5 million U.S. dollars.

    **Brazil**
    Brazil has taken a more nuanced approach to regulation, with a new law that came into force in March stopping short of a full ban on under-16 social media use. Instead, the law requires all accounts held by users under 16 to be linked to a legal guardian to enable adult supervision. The legislation also outlaws intentionally addictive platform features, such as infinite scroll and automatic video playback. Additionally, it mandates that platforms implement robust age verification mechanisms that go far beyond simple self-declaration of age, to block minors from accessing inappropriate content.

    **Canada**
    Earlier this month, Canadian lawmakers introduced new legislation that would establish a dedicated national regulator, the Digital Safety Commission of Canada. Under the proposed rules, users under 16 would be barred from holding social media accounts unless platform operators can prove they have effective systems in place to remove harmful content, including nonconsensual intimate imagery, content that encourages self-harm in minors, and material that incites violence or spreads hatred.

    **Global Pipeline of New Regulation**
    A host of other nations are already in the process of developing or considering their own age-based restrictions on social media access for minors. This group includes France, Spain, Denmark, Greece, Thailand, and South Korea, signaling that the global trend toward stricter online protection for youth is only expected to accelerate in the coming months.

  • Drone strikes kill over 1,000 civilians in Sudan in the first 5 months of 2026, UN rights chief says

    Drone strikes kill over 1,000 civilians in Sudan in the first 5 months of 2026, UN rights chief says

    GENEVA – A senior United Nations official has sounded the alarm over a catastrophic escalation of civilian harm in Sudan’s four-year ongoing conflict, confirming that drone strikes alone have killed more than 1,000 non-combatant civilians across the war-torn northeast African nation between January and May 2026. U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk announced the grim findings during an address to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on Monday, highlighting that the growing deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles has drastically raised the death toll for civilian populations caught in the crossfire between Sudan’s warring factions.

    Türk’s remarks detailed a documented sharp uptick in three devastating trends of the conflict: expanded drone warfare, widespread sexual violence, and mass atrocities that meet international definitions of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Sudanese conflict first erupted on April 15, 2023, when a long-simmering power struggle between Sudan’s formal national military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) broke out into open armed combat, starting in the capital Khartoum before spreading to every major region of the country.

    Data from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), a U.S.-based conflict monitoring organization, underscores the scale of the drone-driven surge in fatalities. By ACLED’s count, at least 2,670 people — a mix of combatants and civilians — died in drone-related incidents across Sudan in 2025. That marked a 600% jump in total drone-linked deaths and an 81% rise in the number of drone attacks compared to 2024 figures. Over the full first three years of the conflict, ACLED recorded at least 59,000 total fatalities, though the organization has cautioned that the actual death toll is almost certainly much higher, as widespread insecurity and collapsed communication infrastructure make full, accurate on-the-ground reporting nearly impossible.

    Most recently, a drone strike carried out by the RSF last week hit civilian sites in Sudan’s central city of el-Obeid, targeting a public cemetery and a commercial gas station. Local health officials confirmed that the attack left at least 15 people dead.

    According to Türk’s briefing, both the Sudanese military and the RSF have increasingly deployed explosive-laden drones in their operations, with repeated strikes targeting civilian infrastructure that is protected under international humanitarian law. Documented targets have included hospitals, hydroelectric dams, schools, open-air public markets, and camps for internally displaced people. Today, drone strikes have emerged as the deadliest single threat to civilians in Sudan’s conflict, a crisis that has been largely overshadowed by higher-profile international conflicts in Gaza and Iran in recent months.

    Beyond the growing carnage from drone attacks, Türk confirmed that rape and other forms of sexual violence have become rampant across regions controlled by both warring parties. The United Nations and independent international human rights organizations have documented mass rape and ethnically targeted killings that rise to the level of systematic crimes against humanity.

    The protracted conflict has also spiraled into what the UN describes as the world’s most severe ongoing humanitarian catastrophe. Approximately 34 million Sudanese — nearly two-thirds of the country’s entire population — currently require life-saving humanitarian assistance, while widespread fighting has reduced major urban centers to rubble and left critical basic services nonfunctional across most of the country.

  • France star Mbappe vows to increase defensive work

    France star Mbappe vows to increase defensive work

    As France enters the 2026 FIFA World Cup as two-time champions, their new captain Kylian Mbappe is making a public commitment to shore up a key gap in his game ahead of the team’s opening group stage match against Senegal on Tuesday. The 27-year-old striker, who completed a high-profile transfer from Paris Saint-Germain to Real Madrid in 2024, has faced mounting criticism in his second season at the Santiago Bernabeu, where the club finished the campaign trophy-less despite his individual success as La Liga’s top goalscorer.

    Much of the scrutiny has centered on Mbappe’s limited defensive output, a weakness backed up by official Opta data across Europe’s top five leagues. Among 1,490 players with at least 19 league appearances in the 2025-26 season, Mbappe ranked 1,350th in combined defensive metrics including interceptions, blocks, tackles, and recovered possession. His rate of just 0.14 tackles per 90 minutes placed him in the bottom five of the same ranking. Compounding these on-pitch questions, Mbappe also missed a portion of Real Madrid’s season with a hamstring injury, and the club’s trophy drought fueled growing fan frustration and unconfirmed reports of unrest in the first-team dressing room.

    The French star has not been without support in the face of this criticism. His international teammate Ousmane Dembele recently spoke out publicly, arguing that the negative commentary targeting Mbappe has gone “too far”. During a recent interview with French newspaper Le Parisien, where questions were posed by teammates and close friends, Mbappe’s younger brother Ethan – who currently plays for Ligue 1 side Lille – teased the captain over his defensive shortcomings. Rather than pushing back on the critique, Mbappe acknowledged the gap in his game and pledged to improve ahead of the World Cup.

    “I need to take the extra step [with my defensive work] because it’s something important for the team and I have to do it,” Mbappe told the outlet. “It will start this time because we want to win, and to win, I’m ready to do whatever because I want to win at all costs.”

    For Mbappe, this World Cup carries extra personal milestones beyond the team’s pursuit of a third global title. This is his first tournament as France’s full-time captain, having stepped into the role following Hugo Lloris’ retirement from international football in 2023. Already one of the most prolific goalscorers in World Cup history, with 12 goals in 14 tournament appearances to date – including a historic hat-trick in the 2022 final against Argentina – one more goal will tie him with Olivier Giroud as France’s all-time leading men’s international goalscorer.

    After kicking off their group stage campaign against Senegal, Didier Deschamps’ side will face Iraq and Norway in their remaining two pool matches as they look to progress to the knockout rounds of the 2026 World Cup.

  • London court convicts 2 men of plot to torch property linked to UK prime minister

    London court convicts 2 men of plot to torch property linked to UK prime minister

    LONDON – A London court has handed down guilty convictions to two foreign nationals in connection with a coordinated arson conspiracy targeting properties linked to United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer, a plot organized by an unidentified Russian-speaking figure who remains untraced and uncharged, authorities confirmed Monday.

    The series of deliberate fires were carried out in May 2025, targeting three sites connected to Starmer: the residential home he vacated after taking office as prime minister, a co-owned apartment building, and his former Toyota sport utility vehicle, which was completely destroyed in the blaze. Remarkably, no people were injured in the overnight attacks, though multiple residents experienced life-threatening fear and property damage. Starmer’s sister-in-law, who was residing in his former home at the time of the attack, recalled waking to a loud explosion and thick smoke that choked the stairwell, leaving her 9-year-old daughter panicked. Another occupant of the targeted apartment building was forced to flee to the building’s roof to escape toxic smoke that filled all interior hallways.

    According to trial evidence, the conspiracy was masterminded by an individual operating under the alias “El Money,” who recruited participants via the encrypted messaging platform Telegram. The ringleader offered 22-year-old Ukrainian national Roman Lavrynovych payment in cryptocurrency to carry out the arson attacks and capture video footage of the damage to be posted online, ensuring the attack received widespread public attention. El Money’s true identity has never been uncovered, and he has not been named in any charges connected to the plot.

    Commander Helen Flanagan, lead of the Metropolitan Police’s counterterrorism unit, told reporters that investigators have not uncovered concrete evidence linking the plot to a hostile state actor, as authorities have not been able to establish El Money’s underlying motive or confirm who he may be working for. Even so, Flanagan noted that the clear intent of the attack was transparent: “Clearly the tasking was to intimidate and create fear for the prime minister and to attack the U.K.”

    Alongside Lavrynovych, 27-year-old Romanian citizen Stanislav Carpiuc was also found guilty of conspiracy to damage property by fire at London’s Central Criminal Court. Carpiuc served as a middleman coordinating between El Money and the arsonist, while 35-year-old Ukrainian national Petro Pochynok, who was accused of being recruited to film the attacks for payment, was acquitted of all charges by the jury.

    Lavrynovych received additional convictions on two counts of arson that recklessly endangered human life. During his trial, the defendant admitted to carrying out the fires, telling the court he took the job to earn £3,000 ($4,000) to cover urgent medical costs for his ill father. He claimed he only followed through on the plot after direct threats from El Money, and testified that he had no knowledge the properties were linked to Starmer until after the blazes were set. He also told investigators he had never even heard of the UK prime minister before his arrest, and insisted he never intended to harm any residents.

    Court records show El Money provided step-by-step instructions for the attack, including exact details of each target, guidance on mixing flammable materials, and tactics to avoid detection by law enforcement. Recovered messages from Lavrynovych’s phone also revealed he had carried out other paid vandalism for El Money previously, including blacking out car windshields and placing anti-Islam posters in majority-Muslim neighborhoods of London.

    As part of the pre-arranged plan, El Money instructed Lavrynovych to send a secret message using the code word “geranium” if he was taken into police custody. Unusually, Lavrynovych was arrested shortly after sending the code, and he never received the promised payment for carrying out the three fires.

    The two convicted men are scheduled to receive their official sentencing this Friday, as the Metropolitan Police continues its investigation to track down the elusive ringleader El Money.

  • Former American businessman detained in Myanmar after alleged financial misconduct

    Former American businessman detained in Myanmar after alleged financial misconduct

    In a development that has drawn international attention, Adam Castillo, the former president of the American Chamber of Commerce (AMCHAM) in Myanmar and founder of a prominent local security firm, has been taken into custody shortly after arriving at Yangon International Airport. The detention comes as AMCHAM Myanmar conducts an internal investigation into suspicious financial activity linked to former board members of the organization.

    An anonymous associate of Castillo, who requested anonymity out of fear for personal safety, confirmed to the Associated Press that the 41-year-old U.S. national was detained on Thursday. Castillo, who leads AGS Myanmar — a risk management and security firm that also offers commercial cleaning and pest control services — has not issued any public response to the detention, and his company declined to elaborate on the situation beyond calling it an “ongoing matter”. Messages sent to Castillo via his personal website also went unanswered.

    U.S. State Department officials have confirmed they are aware of reports of the American citizen’s detention, but declined to provide further details, citing privacy protections for U.S. nationals abroad. Myanmar’s military-backed ruling administration, which has faced widespread international isolation since its 2021 coup and has limited communication with international media amid the ongoing civil conflict, has not released any official statement regarding Castillo’s arrest. Requests for comment from Myanmar’s central government, the Yangon regional administration, and the Yangon Regional Police Department went unanswered. Multiple military-aligned local media outlets, including NP News, have reported that the arrest followed a formal complaint filed against Castillo by AMCHAM Myanmar. Castillo led the organization, which advocates for American business interests operating in Myanmar, from 2023 through early 2025.

    When contacted for comment on the complaint, AMCHAM Myanmar’s executive director Myat Phyu The declined to share specific details of the case, but directed reporters to the chamber’s May 29 annual report, which addresses the ongoing investigation. According to the document, the current AMCHAM board discovered questionable transactions carried out by former board representatives last year, and immediately turned the matter over to an independent law firm for forensic review.

    The investigation uncovered that an unnamed former board representative signed a November 2024 contract with a Washington D.C.-based public relations firm. The firm paid $300,000 in connection with the deal, and the full sum was collected and disbursed outside of AMCHAM Myanmar’s official financial accounts. The annual report notes that the unauthorized signature exceeded the formal signing authority granted to individual board members, and the full board never approved the agreement. “AMCHAM Myanmar received no funds, made no payments, and received no services, and the matter was not disclosed to the statutory auditors,” the report reads.

    While the report confirms that two former board members are involved in the suspicious activity, it does not name either individual nor outline what internal legal or disciplinary actions the chamber has pursued to date. Myat Phyu The also declined to elaborate on details beyond what is included in the public report. In a June 12 statement posted to the organization’s official website, the AMCHAM board said it “has taken appropriate steps to safeguard the interests of the organization and its members.”

    Myanmar has been engulfed in widespread armed conflict since the military seized power from the democratically elected government led by Aung San Suu Kyi in a 2021 coup. After the junta violently crushed peaceful mass protests against the takeover, pro-democracy guerrilla groups and ethnic minority militias launched a widespread armed resistance movement that has left much of the country divided and mired in ongoing violence. Since the coup, authorities have increasingly detained foreign nationals, most frequently foreign reporters covering the country’s political and humanitarian crisis.

    Public profiles on AGS Myanmar’s website list Castillo as a former U.S. Marine Corps officer who completed active duty tours in Afghanistan. He also currently serves as chair of Republican Overseas Myanmar, a group founded in 2024 that works to promote former U.S. President Donald Trump’s “America First” policy agenda across Myanmar and the broader Southeast Asian region.

    It remains unclear where Castillo traveled before his return to Yangon, but social media posts to his public Instagram account show he attended a business forum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, just one day before his arrest, where he promoted his recently published memoir. Castillo’s book, titled *Finding Our Voice*, chronicles his personal experiences living and working in Myanmar through the political upheaval, rising violence, and economic collapse that followed the 2021 military takeover. It is not yet known whether the publication of the memoir is connected to his detention.

  • UK’s ban on Palestine Action under terror legislation was lawful, Court of Appeal says

    UK’s ban on Palestine Action under terror legislation was lawful, Court of Appeal says

    LONDON – In a landmark ruling that has ignited fierce debate over the balance between national security and civil liberties in the United Kingdom, the London Court of Appeal confirmed on Monday that the British government acted within legal bounds when it designated protest group Palestine Action as an official terrorist organization.

    Leading the panel of judges, Chief Justice Sue Carr rejected the group’s core framing of itself as a legitimate civil disobedience movement focused on political advocacy. Instead, Carr emphasized that Palestine Action operates through a network of secretive, decentralized cells, which have targeted and destroyed property belonging to UK defense contractors and on British military installations.

    “To describe Palestine Action as a non-violent movement is not a defensible claim,” Carr wrote in the court’s judgment. “That core premise of the group’s argument is fundamentally and irreparably flawed.”

    Monday’s ruling reverses an earlier February decision issued by three senior High Court justices. In that initial ruling, judges acknowledged that the group had engaged in criminal activity to advance its political goals, but concluded the scope of those actions did not meet the threshold required for a full proscription as a terrorist organization. The government’s ban on the group remained in effect throughout the appeals process, pending the court’s final decision.

    In response to the ruling, Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori said the group would continue its legal challenge to the ban “all the way” to the UK Supreme Court, and if needed, to the European Court of Human Rights. Ammori called the proscription “one of the most extreme attacks on free speech and the right to protest in modern British history.”

    The British government first moved to outlaw the group in 2025, after activists breached security at a Royal Air Force base in June of that year to protest the UK’s ongoing military support for Israel’s military campaign against Hamas in Gaza. The Gaza offensive has killed more than 45,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, and that base break-in followed a string of earlier vandalism incidents carried out by the group across the UK.

    Under the terms of the proscription, Palestine Action is now listed alongside designated terrorist groups including al-Qaida and Hamas. Membership in the group, or even public support for it, is a criminal offense punishable by a maximum 14-year prison sentence.

    Already, law enforcement data shows more than 3,300 people have been arrested at protests across the UK simply for holding signs that read “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.” More than 700 of those individuals have been formally charged under the UK’s Terrorism Act, though none have yet been convicted of any offense related to those charges.

    Civil liberties advocates and supporters of Palestine Action warn that the widespread arrests of peaceful demonstrators represent a clear violation of long-standing rights to free expression and peaceful protest in the UK. The grassroots group Defend Our Juries issued a statement warning that the Court of Appeal’s ruling will lead to even more misallocation of police resources, wasting public funds on locking up ordinary people engaged in peaceful political advocacy. “It appears the courts have been instrumentalized to suppress opposition to genocide, when they should be doing the precise opposite,” the group said.

    Founded in 2020, Palestine Action has organized hundreds of direct action protests at military and defense industry sites across the UK, including repeated break-ins at facilities owned by Elbit Systems UK, an Israeli-owned arms manufacturer. UK government officials estimate the group’s actions have caused millions of British pounds in property damage, and argue that the disruptions pose tangible risks to UK national security.

    Even in its earlier February ruling, the High Court acknowledged that some of the group’s acts met the legal definition of terrorist activity, but judges held that those individual acts could be prosecuted through standard criminal law without needing to ban the entire organization.

    Just days before Monday’s appeal ruling, four Palestine Action members who broke into an Elbit Systems factory in Bristol, southwest England, in 2024 and damaged manufacturing equipment were sentenced to prison after a judge ruled their actions qualified as terrorist activity. More than 100 Palestine Action supporters were arrested outside the London court holding the sentencing hearing for holding a peaceful demonstration in solidarity with the activists.