作者: admin

  • What is Jerusalem Day and the March of Flags?

    What is Jerusalem Day and the March of Flags?

    This week, Israelis are set to observe Jerusalem Day, a national holiday that marks the capture of East Jerusalem by Israeli military forces in the 1967 Six-Day War. The annual commemoration will kick off at sunset on Thursday, May 14, and conclude at nightfall the following day, May 15 – one day before Palestinians mark the Nakba, the catastrophic displacement and violence that accompanied the founding of the state of Israel in 1948.

    The origins of the holiday stretch back to 1968, just one year after the 1967 war, when Israeli lawmakers voted to establish a formal observance of Israel’s seizure of Palestinian-inhabited East Jerusalem. It was formally enshrined as a national holiday in 1998, when then-prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu signed the legislation into law during his first term in office. Immediately following the 1967 conflict, Israel annexed the occupied areas of Jerusalem, granting permanent residency status to local Palestinian residents. That status allows Palestinians to vote in municipal elections, but bars them from voting for Israel’s national parliament, the Knesset. Today, roughly 350,000 Palestinians call East Jerusalem home, the majority of whom hold no Israeli citizenship and have no national representation in the government that governs their daily lives.

    For Israelis, the holiday centers on commemorating soldiers killed in the 1967 battle for Jerusalem, and is framed as a celebration of the reunification of the city under full Israeli control. This year, the Jerusalem Municipality has called on participants to “march with courage and valour, with Israeli flags raised high, and connect themselves with the celebration of Jerusalem’s eternity, and bind Jerusalem forever.”

    The centerpiece of the annual observance is the Flag March, which draws tens of thousands of participants, the majority of whom identify with Israel’s ultra-nationalist and far-right factions. Per the Knesset’s official description of the event, the large procession starts in central Jerusalem, moves into the Old City, and concludes at the Western Wall with a collective prayer of thanksgiving. But human rights groups and independent media have repeatedly documented the event as a flashpoint for anti-Palestinian violence, harassment, and provocation.

    Far-right Israeli leaders routinely use the march as a platform to broadcast their expansionist and supremacist agenda. Last year, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich told a crowd gathered near the Western Wall that “we are conquering the Land of Israel. We are liberating Gaza. We are settling Gaza. We are defeating the enemy.” Smotrich’s comments, delivered months ahead of a 2025 ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza war, drew loud applause from attendees. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, who has overseen a sharp rise in settler incursions into the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound since taking office in 2022, used the 2024 march to deliver an overtly provocative message: “Jerusalem is ours. Damascus Gate is ours. The Temple Mount is ours. … it is ours.”

    Under Ben Gvir’s leadership, Israeli police deployed more than 3,000 officers to secure the 2024 march, clearing a path for participants through the Old City’s Damascus Gate and Muslim Quarter. Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem has documented that during the procession, far-right participants regularly hurl racist chants, assault Palestinian residents, and vandalize Palestinian property in the Muslim Quarter, while local businesses are forced to close and residents are confined to their homes to avoid violence. Independent Israeli left-wing outlet Local Call has described the march as “a display of racism and violence under police protection,” noting that once confined to fringe far-right groups, open racist chants have become widespread across participants in recent years, amid Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza.

    B’Tselem has recorded dozens of violent incidents targeting both Palestinian residents and journalists covering the event. In 2023, before the start of the current Gaza war, one reporter told the group that “groups of Jews threw stones, plastic water bottles, and broken flag poles at us,” with at least two correspondents hit by rioters. Another journalist described being struck in the head by a projectile, saying he was too afraid to leave the area before the march concluded out of fear of further attack. Uri Erlich, spokesperson for Israeli NGO Emek Shaveh, which defends cultural heritage rights in the region, noted that a broader shift has occurred in recent years: “It is not the march that has become more extreme, but [Israeli] society.”

    This year’s observance comes amid new controversial policy moves from the Israeli government. Multiple reports confirm the government plans to redraw Jerusalem’s municipal boundaries for the first time since the 1967 annexation of East Jerusalem, expanding the city’s borders further into the occupied West Bank’s Palestinian-inhabited territory. Additionally, Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported last month that the government has allocated more than 1 million shekels ($344,000) to fund new satellite flag marches led by Israeli settlers in cities across the country outside Jerusalem.

    The stated goal of the program is to reinforce “a sense of connection and identification with Jerusalem, Israel’s capital, even among those who do not live in it.” Marches are scheduled in Lod, Ramla, Haifa, Yavne, Ashdod, Beersheba, Herzliya, Petah Tikva, and Raanana, many of which have large Palestinian citizen populations. This is not the first time parallel flag marches have been held outside Jerusalem: in recent years, processions in cities including Lod and Jaffa have already sparked severe intercommunal tension with local Palestinian communities.

    This year’s Jerusalem Day, held on the eve of the Nakba commemoration – which marks the 1948 ethnic cleansing of Palestine that left an estimated 13,000 Palestinians dead and 750,000 displaced from their ancestral homes – is expected to reignite longstanding international and regional tensions over the status of Jerusalem and the rights of Palestinian residents in the city.

  • I led hikers up an Indonesian volcano – and then it erupted

    I led hikers up an Indonesian volcano – and then it erupted

    Nestled on Indonesia’s Halmahera Island in North Maluku, the chronically active Mount Dukono turned deadly on a Friday morning in May, when a sudden volcanic eruption claimed three lives in a group of hikers who had accessed the restricted mountain despite official climbing bans. For Reza Selang, the local Indonesian guide who led the 20-person expedition, the harrowing moments of the blast remain seared into his memory, leaving him grappling with overwhelming grief, guilt, and ongoing legal scrutiny.

    Reza, who operates a small tour company in North Maluku, was contracted in 2025 by Singaporean adventure expedition organizer Timothy Heng to guide the mixed group of Singaporean and Indonesian hikers on a multi-mountain trek that included Dukono. The group began their ascent on Thursday afternoon, and Reza told the BBC that there were no visible signs of impending volcanic activity at that point, nor when the party reached the summit early Friday morning. Even a pre-ascent drone sweep of the crater captured no smoke or unusual activity. Reza allowed 14 hikers, including Heng, to approach the crater with a promise of a quick descent, while he and the remaining six hikers waited at a lower elevation.

    At 7:40 a.m. local time, just one minute after Reza launched his drone to monitor the group near the crater, the mountain erupted. The first blast only released plumes of smoke, but a far more violent second eruption followed 15 to 20 seconds later, hurling massive volcanic rock fragments and ash across the summit. Panicked, the group scattered and fled down the slope, but Reza spotted Singaporean hiker Shahin Muhrez bin Abdul Hamid injured and stranded near the crater via his drone feed. Reza rushed upward to rescue Shahin, and Heng, who had already escaped, turned back to help.

    As the two men dragged the injured hiker down the mountain, with flying rocks falling on all sides, a 2-meter-wide boulder dislodged from the crater and bounced toward them. In a split second, Reza recalled, Heng pushed Shahin behind him and absorbed the full impact of the rock. The boulder crushed both men instantly, killing them on the spot. Shocked frozen for nearly a minute, Reza fled down the mountain to alert emergency authorities.

    Indonesian officials launched an immediate search and rescue operation for the two dead Singaporeans and a third missing hiker, Indonesian national Angel Krishela Pradita. Angel’s body was recovered near the summit on Saturday, while the remains of Heng and Shahin were extracted from beneath ash and rock on Sunday. All surviving hikers were evacuated to a nearby local hospital for treatment of minor injuries, and the remaining Singaporean citizens have since returned to their home country.

    The tragedy has shone a light on longstanding lax enforcement of volcanic hazard restrictions in Indonesia, a nation positioned along the Pacific Ring of Fire that sees frequent seismic and volcanic activity. Authorities confirmed that Mount Dukono has erupted more than 200 times since late March 2026, and that a full suspension of climbing permits and a ban on entry within 4 kilometers of the crater had been in place since April 17. Officials added that warnings had been posted to social media and displayed on physical banners at all trail entrances to the mountain. The area is now permanently closed to all visitors, and officials have pledged to sanction anyone who violates the entry ban.

    Reza maintains that he had no knowledge of the full prohibition, noting that local villagers he regularly hires to assist with guiding expeditions also did not alert him to the new restrictions. He acknowledged that he was aware Dukono was rated at Level 2 on Indonesia’s four-tier volcanic alert system, a classification that marks increased observable activity and restricts access to high-risk zones, but added that other popular Level 2 volcanoes in Indonesia, such as Mount Rinjani, still allow hiking outside restricted crater zones. He told reporters he leads climbs up Dukono almost monthly without incident, a common practice among local tour operators despite the mountain’s active status.

    Indonesian police have launched a formal investigation into the incident, focusing on allegations of negligence by tour operators and individual organizers. Reza has already been questioned by investigators, and has turned over his drone footage of the eruption as evidence. Police confirmed two people associated with Reza’s tour company have been questioned as witnesses, but are still examining the role each party played in organizing the unauthorized climb. Officials have stated they will not show leniency to any parties found responsible for negligence that led to the deaths. Reza says he accepts whatever legal consequences result from the investigation, and only hopes the process concludes quickly.

    In the days following the eruption, Reza has been open about his crippling guilt and regret over the tragedy. He told the BBC he is haunted by endless ‘what-ifs’ – what if the group had never climbed, what if he had never accepted the expedition contract. ‘I feel very guilty toward the victims and their families,’ he said. ‘I feel like I want to go [to Singapore] and kneel at the victims’ parents’ feet. I want to apologise.’

  • Iran offer was ‘reasonable,’ official says after Trump rejection

    Iran offer was ‘reasonable,’ official says after Trump rejection

    On a Monday press briefing, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei pushed back against former U.S. President Donald Trump’s outright rejection of Tehran’s counter-proposal for a nuclear and regional peace agreement, defending the initiative as a reasonable and good-faith effort to de-escalate long-standing tensions. “The only thing we have demanded is Iran’s legitimate rights,” Baghaei stated, countering accusations of Iranian intransigence by accusing Washington of clinging to a set of non-negotiable unreasonable demands that have stalled progress toward a diplomatic resolution.

    Trump’s rejection came via a public social media post over the weekend, where he dismissed Iran’s counteroffer to Washington’s latest proposal as “totally unacceptable” and added “I don’t like it,” offering no specific details about which provisions he found objectionable. The abrupt, vague dismissal immediately roiled global energy markets, driving crude oil prices sharply higher as investors priced in heightened risk of a wider regional conflict.

    While full text of both the U.S. proposal and Iran’s counterproposal remain confidential, think tank expert Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, outlined leaked key concessions Iran has put forward that represent a significant shift from Tehran’s earlier negotiating positions. According to Parsi’s analysis, Iran has compromised on two of the most contentious sticking points in the talks: uranium stockpiles and long-term enrichment limits.

    Previously, Tehran refused to ship any of its existing uranium stockpile outside of the country, only agreeing to dilute the material to lower-grade, non-weapons grade. Under the new proposal, Parsi says Iran has offered to downblend a portion of its stockpile and send the remainder to a neutral third party for storage. On enrichment, Iran has also agreed to a 12-year moratorium on all domestic uranium enrichment — a major compromise that falls between Trump’s original demand for a 15- to 20-year pause and Tehran’s initial offer of just three to five years.

    “That Iran is willing to pause enrichment at all is a significant concession that I am not sure is fully appreciated by the American side,” Parsi noted in his analysis. He questioned why Trump has hardened Washington’s negotiating position beyond its original core red line of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, suggesting the shift is driven by pressure from U.S. ally Israel. “The insistence on shipping the entire stockpile out appears to be another example of Trump allowing America’s red lines to be replaced by Israel’s,” Parsi wrote. “It would be a shame if the entire negotiation collapses over this issue.”

    Trump confirmed over the weekend that he had spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about Iran’s proposal, calling the conversation “very nice” and noting the two leaders maintain a “good relationship.”

    Iran’s semi-official Tasnim News Agency, citing an anonymous informed source, further clarified the key terms of Tehran’s proposal on Monday. The document prioritizes an immediate end to ongoing hostilities, ironclad international guarantees against future U.S. aggression, the full lifting of crippling U.S. economic sanctions on Iran, and an immediate end to the U.S.-led naval blockade of Iran once an initial preliminary agreement is signed. It also reaffirms Iran’s sovereign authority over the Strait of Hormuz — a critical global energy chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil supplies pass — contingent on Washington fulfilling its commitments under the deal. The proposal also includes provisions for advancing regional security and guaranteeing safe commercial passage through the strait.

    Baghaei pushed back hard against narratives framing Iran as the unreasonable party to the negotiations, pointing to Washington’s history of aggressive action in the region to counter the claim. “It is enough to look at Iran’s record,” he said. “Were we the ones who deployed troops? Are we the ones bullying countries in the Western Hemisphere? Were we the ones who committed assassinations twice during negotiations?” He also defended Tehran’s core asks, asking: “Is our proposal for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz unreasonable? Is establishing peace and security across the entire region irresponsible?”

  • South African president says he will not step down after impeachment call

    South African president says he will not step down after impeachment call

    South Africa’s sitting president Cyril Ramaphosa, who has held the nation’s highest office since 2018, has announced he will not step down amid growing pressure over the Phala Phala cash theft scandal, and will instead launch a legal battle to block the report that cleared the way for parliamentary impeachment proceedings against him. The announcement on Monday put an end to weeks of widespread public speculation over whether Ramaphosa would choose to resign to avoid the unfolding political crisis, with the president stating firmly: “I remain here and am not resigning.”

    The controversy at the center of the current political standoff traces back to an incident of large-scale cash theft from Ramaphosa’s private game farm, Phala Phala, where thousands of U.S. dollars were discovered missing from concealed storage inside furniture on the property. An independent investigative panel assembled to probe the incident concluded that there was prima facie evidence suggesting Ramaphosa may have committed serious misconduct related to his handling of the theft. Ramaphosa has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, maintaining that the stolen funds were proceeds from the legitimate sale of buffalo through his private farming operation.

    Last week, South Africa’s Constitutional Court delivered a landmark ruling that upended the existing parliamentary process, finding that the national legislature had acted unconstitutionally when it voted in 2022 to reject launching a formal impeachment inquiry into Ramaphosa based on the Phala Phala panel’s findings. The top court ordered that the matter must proceed to a full impeachment examination in parliament, rather than being dismissed entirely.

    In response to the ruling, Ramaphosa confirmed that his legal team would petition the courts to review the independent panel’s investigative report and ultimately have it set aside. The president argues the findings are fundamentally flawed because they relied heavily on unsubstantiated hearsay evidence rather than verifiable, direct proof of misconduct. If Ramaphosa’s legal challenge fails and the impeachment process moves forward, the report will become the core foundation for opposition parties’ legislative efforts to oust him from the presidency.

    Political analyst Professor Richard Calland, who studies South Africa’s political landscape, noted that even if the impeachment vote proceeds to a floor vote in parliament, Ramaphosa is likely to secure enough support to remain in office. Calland added that Ramaphosa’s decision to pursue a legal challenge may be a strategic move to avoid a public, damaging impeachment hearing entirely — a process that would inevitably cause lasting harm to the president’s public reputation and political legacy, regardless of the final vote outcome.

  • Israel closes case against officers accused of killing Palestinian family: Report

    Israel closes case against officers accused of killing Palestinian family: Report

    A 2024 shooting incident that left four members of a Palestinian family dead, including two young children, in the occupied West Bank is on the verge of being closed without accountability, an Israeli news outlet has confirmed. The deadly encounter unfolded in March in Tammun, a northern West Bank town, when undercover Israeli special forces opened fire on the vehicle carrying 37-year-old Ali Bani Odeh, his 35-year-old wife Waad, and their four children. Ali, Waad, and their two youngest sons — 5-year-old Mohammad and 7-year-old Othman — were killed instantly. Two older children, 8-year-old Mustafa and 12-year-old Khaled, survived the attack but suffered severe shrapnel injuries to their faces and heads.

    In the immediate aftermath of the shooting, Israeli forces blocked Palestinian medical responders from accessing the scene. After detaining the two wounded surviving children for more than 30 minutes, soldiers finally allowed medics to reach them only on the condition that the ambulance leave the area immediately after extracting the injured boys.

    An anonymous security source cited by i24News shared the military’s initial account of the incident: forces claimed they opened fire after spotting the vehicle speeding toward their position, saying officers “sensed imminent danger” and acted in self-defense.

    But human rights advocates have immediately pushed back on this narrative, rejecting the military’s claim of a threat. Heba Morayef, regional director for Amnesty International covering the Middle East and North Africa, noted that Israeli military officials have failed to produce any evidence that the Bani Odeh family posed any danger to the soldiers at the time of the shooting. She described the mass killing as a horrific event that fits a wider, deeply troubling pattern of escalating lethal force used by Israeli forces against Palestinian civilians, where children and entire families too often bear the deadly cost. Morayef added that witness testimonies raise serious suspicions that the attack amounts to an extrajudicial execution, an unlawful killing outside any legal process.

    This pattern of justification is well-documented: the Israeli military almost always releases nearly identical claims of self-defense after its troops kill Palestinian civilians in the West Bank. Independent and human rights observers have long criticized the Israeli military for rarely opening meaningful investigations into deaths of Palestinians at the hands of its troops, and for enabling a widely condemned “shoot-to-kill” policy that allows troops to use lethal force even when unarmed Palestinians pose no immediate threat to soldiers.

    According to reporting from the Israeli outlet, while Israeli police launched a formal investigation into the Bani Odeh family killing, the special forces officers who carried out the shooting were never questioned as part of the probe. The investigation concluded in recent days, and the case is now expected to be formally closed by Israel’s Attorney General’s office without any disciplinary or legal action against the involved personnel.

    The shooting and impending closure of the case comes amid a sharp spike in Palestinian deaths in the West Bank following the October 7, 2023, attacks. Data from independent monitors shows that Israeli military forces and illegal Israeli settlers have killed at least 1,100 Palestinians in the West Bank since that date.

    For the town of Tammun, which is home to roughly 15,000 Palestinian residents, deadly Israeli military incursions are a regular occurrence. Forces almost always carry out these raids under the pretext of searching for “wanted individuals,” but the vast majority of people killed in these operations are unarmed civilians and children.

  • Watch: Alaska town sees its last sunset until August

    Watch: Alaska town sees its last sunset until August

    Perched on the frozen edge of the Arctic Circle, Utqiagvik — the northernmost incorporated city in the United States, located along Alaska’s rugged northern coastline — has marked one of its most dramatic annual astronomical events: the final sunset of the spring season that will leave the community bathed in nonstop daylight for nearly three full months.

    On the day of the final sunset, thousands of local residents and visiting astronomy enthusiasts gathered along the town’s windswept shoreline to watch the sun dip briefly below the horizon, a sight that will not be seen again in the region until mid-August. Following this fleeting sunset, the town will enter its annual period of midnight sun, a 84-day stretch of uninterrupted daylight driven by the Earth’s axial tilt, which tilts the northern hemisphere toward the sun during the spring and summer months.

    Unlike the polar night that engulfs Utqiagvik for roughly two months during the depths of winter, when the sun never rises above the horizon, the midnight sun phenomenon brings 24 hours of natural light that reshapes daily life for the town’s roughly 4,000 residents. Many locals embrace the constant daylight, extending outdoor work hours, planning late-night hiking and fishing trips, and hosting community gatherings that stretch into the early hours of the morning, when the sun hovers just above the northern horizon casting a soft golden glow across the Arctic tundra.

    This annual astronomical event draws hundreds of tourists to Utqiagvik (formerly known as Barrow) each year, boosting the local tourism economy that relies heavily on Arctic wilderness and unique astronomical attractions. Visitors come to capture photos of the final sunset, experience the otherworldly feeling of sunlight at midnight, and witness the distinct seasonal rhythm that defines life in one of the northernmost communities on Earth. When the sun finally sets again in August, the town will begin the slow shift toward the long dark polar night of winter, closing another annual cycle of extreme light and dark that shapes life on Alaska’s Arctic coast.

  • How Andy Burnham stood up to Starmer over Israel and could now reshape UK foreign policy

    How Andy Burnham stood up to Starmer over Israel and could now reshape UK foreign policy

    Just two years after securing a landslide general election victory, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer finds himself trapped in an existential battle for his political future, triggered by catastrophic, unexpected losses for the Labour Party in last week’s local elections. This challenge to his leadership has been months in the making: earlier this year, Starmer already nearly fell from power following the Peter Mandelson scandal, when damning connections between the now-former US ambassador, a close Starmer ally, and convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein came to light. Back then, internal Labour sources confirm, party figures opted to hold off on a leadership challenge solely to avoid upheaval ahead of the local elections, allowing Starmer to cling to his position. Today, that reprieve is over, and Starmer is surrounded by potential successors ready to step in if he steps down or is forced out. Whitehall insiders name four leading contenders for the top job: Health Secretary Wes Streeting, former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, and Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham. What is most notable about this unfolding leadership crisis is its likely ripple effect on British foreign policy, particularly regarding Israel — a topic that has dominated UK political discourse for more than two years amid Israel’s military campaign in Gaza and the recent economic shocks stemming from the US-Israeli war on Iran. Leading pollster Sir John Curtis has confirmed that the Green Party, the most prominent UK political voice opposing British support for Israel, inflicted far more damage on Labour’s local election vote share than right-wing challenger Reform UK. With left-wing and progressive voters abandoning Labour in droves over its Israel policy, any new leader will be forced to shift course to win back disaffected voters and undercut the Green Party’s growing momentum. That shift would almost certainly mean a far firmer stance against documented Israeli war crimes, analysts say. Of the four main contenders, Andy Burnham has staked out the most distinct position on Israel, diverging sharply from Starmer’s pro-Israeli stance over the last two years. A popular soft-left figure within Labour, Burnham’s history on the issue is layered: he voted for the 2003 UK invasion of Iraq under Tony Blair, joined the pro-Israel lobby group Labour Friends of Israel in 2015, and during that year’s Labour leadership campaign described the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement as “spiteful”, called Israel a “democracy with a long history of protecting minorities”, and argued the Balfour Declaration should be celebrated in UK schools as an example of British values. But even in his early career, Burnham positioned himself as a critic of hardline Israeli government policy. A little-documented 2012 trip to the occupied West Bank with the pro-Palestine group Labour Friends of Palestine foreshadowed his later shift. After Benjamin Netanyahu’s 2015 re-election, he called the result “depressing” on social media, noting Netanyahu had run on a pledge to expand illegal settlements and arguing the Palestinian people would need increased international support. That same year, he told the Palestine Solidarity Campaign he backed full recognition of Palestinian statehood as a right, not a gift, called for an end to Israeli occupation and illegal settlement expansion, and condemned Hamas rocket and terror attacks. In the wake of the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and Israel’s subsequent siege and bombardment of Gaza, Burnham openly broke with Starmer’s approach. While the then-opposition Labour Party aligned with the Conservative government to give Israel unqualified support — with Starmer infamously backing Israel’s “right” to cut off all power and water to Gaza’s 2 million Palestinian civilians — Burnham released a statement just two days later that drew a clear line between himself and his leader. He condemned Hamas’ attacks but only backed Israel’s right to self-defense “in line with international law”, explicitly ruling out carte blanche for Israel and calling for urgent humanitarian access to Gaza. As the Palestinian death toll climbed into the thousands, Burnham went even further, joining London Mayor Sadiq Khan and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar in breaking ranks to call for an immediate bilateral ceasefire, at a time when Starmer was still pressuring rebel MPs to fall in line. In a column explaining his decision, he warned Starmer against labeling dissenting MPs as disloyal, argued Israel’s response to 7 October had to be targeted to avoid being seen as disproportionate and indiscriminate, and publicly recanted his 2003 vote for the Iraq War, acknowledging the US-led invasion had caused massive harm to innocent civilians and fueled terrorist recruitment rather than rooting out extremism. This positioning paid off electorally in 2024: while Labour lost a third of its vote share in UK areas with majority Muslim populations, Burnham comfortably retained his Greater Manchester mayoral post, just as Khan held London despite both having large Muslim constituencies. Over the following two years, Burnham continued to push the Starmer government for bolder action on Palestine, joining a group of senior Labour figures in June 2025 to urge immediate recognition of Palestinian statehood, noting the UK’s historic role in carving up the Middle East via the Sykes-Picot agreement created a moral obligation to endorse Palestinian self-determination. The Starmer government ultimately granted recognition that September. Burnham also remains a prominent supporter of the Council for the Advancement of Arab-British Understanding, which organizes parliamentary trips to the occupied Palestinian territories. His stance puts him sharply at odds with the other three leading contenders, all of whom have largely stuck to Labour’s official pro-Israel line on Gaza. While Ed Miliband, a figure seen as more left-leaning on foreign policy, privately opposed British participation in the recent US-Israeli war on Iran before it launched, he has not broken with the party’s public stance. For his part, Wes Streeting — who narrowly held his seat in 2024 against a challenge from British Palestinian independent candidate Leanne Mohamad — privately acknowledged earlier this year that Israel was “committing war crimes before our eyes” and accused Israel of “rogue state behavior” in leaked text messages with disgraced former ambassador Mandelson, but he has yet to repeat these claims publicly or push for concrete action such as sanctions. Even under Starmer, UK-Israel diplomatic relations have been strained, with London imposing a partial arms embargo on Israel, but the British government has continued deep military and political collaboration with Israel throughout its campaign in Gaza. If Starmer departs, analysts agree that any replacement will face overwhelming electoral pressure to ramp up criticism of Israel, and the UK government could finally move forward with sanctions on goods produced in illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. Burnham’s path to the premiership does face significant barriers: as a sitting mayor, he would first need to secure a parliamentary seat to be eligible for the Labour leadership. Even so, he remains the candidate most likely to pull Labour back to its traditional center-left roots if he clears those hurdles. Regardless of which candidate ultimately prevails, all contenders will be forced to take a public stance on Starmer’s handling of the Gaza conflict, and a fundamental shift in British foreign policy is all but guaranteed in the coming months.

  • Pressure grows on UK’s Starmer to quit as PM

    Pressure grows on UK’s Starmer to quit as PM

    Just 22 months after sweeping to power in a historic landslide that ended 14 years of Conservative rule, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing the most severe crisis of his premiership, as growing numbers of ruling Labour Party lawmakers demand his resignation in the wake of catastrophic local and regional election outcomes. The 63-year-old leader, who took office in July 2024 on a promise of systemic change after years of Conservative austerity, Brexit infighting and mismanaged COVID-19 response, doubled down on Monday on his pledge to hold his position and reframe his agenda to win back disillusioned voters.

    However, his vows to deliver bolder policy action have failed to calm internal dissent. More than 60 of Labour’s 403 sitting members of Parliament have now publicly called for Starmer to step down, including four junior government aides who resigned from their posts over the weekend to register their no confidence. Joe Morris, former parliamentary private secretary to Health Secretary Wes Streeting, a figure long rumored to be considering a leadership bid, wrote on social media platform X that it was “now clear that the prime minister no longer has the trust or confidence of the public to lead this change”.

    Tom Rutland, a former aide to Environment Secretary Emma Reynolds, argued Starmer had “lost authority” among the parliamentary party and would never be able to rebuild that credibility. Melanie Ward, former assistant to Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, acknowledged Starmer’s early work reshaping the Labour Party before the 2024 general election, but said the public’s verdict in last week’s polls was unambiguous. “The message from last week’s elections was clear; the Prime Minister has lost the confidence of the public to lead this change,” she wrote on X. Naushabah Khan, a former Cabinet Office aide who also resigned, added that new leadership was the only way to rebuild public trust and deliver the progressive agenda British voters backed at the 2024 general election.

    Under Labour Party rules, any potential challenger needs the backing of 81 MPs – 20 percent of the party’s parliamentary caucus – to trigger an official leadership contest. A leadership battle would almost certainly plunge the party into crippling internal infighting, with factions on the left and right of the party scrambling to elevate their preferred candidates or shore up Starmer’s remaining support.

    Since taking office, Starmer’s premiership has been marked by a string of missteps. He was recently embroiled in major controversy after the sacking of his appointed UK ambassador to Washington Peter Mandelson, following the exposure of long-concealed ties between Mandelson and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Critically, Starmer has also failed to deliver tangible economic growth to ease the ongoing cost of living crisis that has left millions of British households struggling financially, though he has earned cross-party praise for taking a firm stance against former US President Donald Trump’s policy on Iran.

    Last week’s local and regional elections delivered a damning judgment on Starmer’s tenure. Labour hemorrhaged seats to the hard-right Reform UK and left-wing Green Party, both of which recorded historic gains at Labour’s expense. For the first time since the devolved Welsh parliament was established in 1999, Labour lost control of the legislature to Welsh nationalist party Plaid Cymru. The party also failed to cut into the Scottish National Party’s dominant position in the Scottish Parliament, leaving Labour’s ambition for UK-wide unity unfulfilled.

    In a make-or-break speech to the party on Monday, Starmer acknowledged the widespread public frustration with his leadership and the current state of national politics. “I know I have my doubters, and I know I need to prove them wrong, and I will,” he said. He abandoned his previous incremental policy approach, promising a far more ambitious agenda focused on accelerating economic growth, rebuilding closer ties with the European Union, and overhauling UK energy policy. In a major break from years of muted political discussion on Brexit, Starmer admitted for the first time that the 2020 UK departure from the EU has left the country “poorer, weaker and less secure”. He also announced plans to fully nationalize British Steel, a significant shift from his previously cautious industrial policy. He launched a scathing attack on Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, whose party was the biggest beneficiary of Labour’s election collapse, calling Farage a “chancer” and “grifter” who deceived the British public during the 2016 Brexit referendum. Starmer warned that if the Labour Party failed to reset its course, the UK would slide toward “a very dark path” under far-right leadership.

    Despite the speech, internal dissent has not abated. Senior Labour MP Catherine West, who previously threatened to trigger a leadership challenge this week, announced after the address that she was now collecting signatures from MPs calling on Starmer to outline a formal timetable for a leadership election to be held in September. Starmer has hit back, pledging to fight any challenge and warning that voters would never forgive Labour if it repeated the chaotic turnover of Conservative governments, which saw five different prime ministers take office between 2010 and 2024, including three in just four months in 2022.

    Speculation has long centered on Health Secretary Wes Streeting and former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner as the most likely candidates to oust Starmer. However, neither figure commands universal support across the divided parliamentary party. Rayner, who has not yet explicitly called for Starmer’s resignation, echoed the mood of frustration in her own remarks on Monday, saying “what we are doing isn’t working, and it needs to change.”

  • Hantavirus ship heads to Netherlands after passengers flown home

    Hantavirus ship heads to Netherlands after passengers flown home

    A Dutch-flagged cruise vessel that experienced a deadly hantavirus outbreak that killed three people departed the Canary Islands of Spain on Monday, heading toward its home port of Rotterdam after all remaining passengers were disembarked, repatriated and placed in quarantine across multiple countries.

    The outbreak on the MV Hondius, operated by Netherlands-based cruise firm Oceanwide Expeditions, triggered a global public health alert after the rare rodent-borne virus was detected on board. Unlike the Covid-19 pandemic, global and national health officials have repeatedly emphasized that the general public faces a very low risk of transmission, and that no broad public alarm is warranted, despite the fact that no targeted vaccine or specific curative treatment exists for hantavirus infections.

    According to on-site reporting from Agence France-Presse, the last 28 passengers and personnel were removed from the vessel before it set sail from the port of Granadilla on the island of Tenerife on Monday evening. Cruise operator Oceanwide Expeditions confirmed in an official statement that the 6-day voyage to Rotterdam is scheduled to arrive at the port on the evening of May 17, 2026. The vessel remains crewed by 25 full-time staff and two medical personnel, and is also transporting the remains of a German passenger who died during the outbreak.

    The multi-day, large-scale evacuation wrapped up on Sunday, when 94 people representing 19 nationalities were safely removed from the ship. Spanish health authorities originally only granted permission for the vessel to anchor offshore due to public health protocols, but unfavorable weather conditions forced the ship to dock at the Granadilla industrial port. Spanish officials stressed that all public safety measures were strictly enforced to prevent any contact between people on the ship and local communities. Medical teams escorted all evacuees directly from the vessel to the Tenerife airport for repatriation flights, following mandatory health screenings at every step. The final group of evacuees removed on Monday included citizens of Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and remaining crew members.

    As of Monday, eight confirmed cases of hantavirus and two additional probable cases have been recorded across the outbreak, with people from six countries affected, according to data from the World Health Organization and national health agencies. Multiple countries have already reported confirmed infections among repatriated passengers: A French woman repatriated to Paris tested positive for the virus after developing symptoms Sunday night; one Spanish evacuee has also tested positive, while 13 other Spanish evacuees returned negative results. U.S. health authorities confirmed one American evacuee with mild symptoms and a second positive case of the Andes virus, the only strain of hantavirus that can spread from human to human.

    In the Netherlands, 12 staff members at Radboud University Medical Center have been placed in six-week preventive quarantine after procedural errors occurred when handling blood work and disposing of urine samples from an infected evacuee being treated at the facility. Hospital officials noted the quarantine is a precautionary measure, as the overall risk of infection remains low.

    Health agencies around the world are currently conducting contact tracing operations, tracking all passengers who disembarked the vessel before the full evacuation, as well as any individuals who may have had close contact with infected evacuees.

    The origin of the outbreak remains a point of discussion between international health authorities. The MV Hondius departed Ushuaia, Argentina – where hantavirus is endemic – on April 1 for an Atlantic cruise bound for Cape Verde. The WHO has stated it believes the initial infection occurred before the voyage departed, with secondary human-to-human transmission taking place on board the ship. However, Argentine health officials have raised questions about this timeline, pointing to the virus’s multi-week incubation period and other epidemiological factors to cast doubt on the theory that the outbreak originated in Ushuaria.

    In a video address shared by the cruise line on Monday, MV Hondius Captain Jan Dobrogowski praised the resilience of everyone on board during the weeks-long crisis, highlighting the “unity and quiet strength” of passengers and the “courage and selfless resolve” of the crew that remained on the vessel to sail it back to Rotterdam.

  • Text scheme as ‘honest mistake’ costing NSW motorists thousands

    Text scheme as ‘honest mistake’ costing NSW motorists thousands

    Tens of thousands of drivers across New South Wales (NSW), Australia, have faced hundreds of dollars in fines over a single preventable mistake each year, but a new state government initiative aims to eliminate these costly penalties for accidental oversights. In 2025 alone, more than 50,000 motorists in NSW were penalized for driving with expired vehicle registration or without valid insurance — violations that most often stem from simple forgetfulness rather than intentional misconduct.

    Currently, more than one million NSW drivers already access digital registration reminders through email or in-app notifications in their official MyServiceNSW and Service NSW accounts, with alerts sent two weeks and one day before expiration. Under a new expansion of the existing opt-in reminder program rolled out by the state’s Labor government, drivers will now be able to add free SMS text message alerts to their reminder suite, delivering a final critical notification directly to their mobile devices.

    Addressing the rationale behind the policy change, NSW Digital Government Minister Jihad Dib noted that late registration renewals almost always stem from everyday disruptions to busy modern lives, not intentional noncompliance. “We know people lead busy lives and can carry huge mental to-do lists. Paperwork gets misplaced, deadlines slip off the radar, and before you know it, your registration has expired,” Dib explained. “By introducing an overdue SMS notification one day after expiry as a final reminder to get your registration sorted, we could save you hundreds of dollars in fines while keeping everyone safe on our roads. This is a simple idea that could make a huge difference to people; by giving drivers this option we are offering you a convenient reminder in the palm of your hand.”

    NSW Roads Minister Jenny Aitchison echoed Dib’s comments, emphasizing that the consequences of an accidental late renewal extend far beyond financial penalties. “Driving unregistered doesn’t just risk a fine, it means being uninsured and putting yourself and others at risk on our roads,” Aitchison said. “These SMS reminders are a simple, practical way to help people stay on top of their rego and avoid an honest mistake that can have serious outcomes.”

    Current penalty structures for unregistered driving in NSW reflect the state’s commitment to road safety, but the government recognizes that penalizing accidental oversights is unfair to residents. Light vehicle drivers face maximum fines of $818 for driving or parking an unregistered vehicle on public roads or related areas, while penalties for unregistered heavy vehicles jump sharply to $1,728.

    The reminder scheme remains entirely optional for NSW motorists. Drivers who choose not to opt in to digital or SMS reminders will continue to receive printed paper reminders via standard mail six weeks before their registration expiration date. As part of a public outreach blitz to boost participation, the NSW government will send invitation messages to more than four million eligible drivers throughout May and June, encouraging them to add SMS reminders to their account settings.