作者： admin

Trump says Xi is considering a detained pastor’s case, but freeing activist Jimmy Lai is ‘tough’

During a media briefing aboard Air Force One while returning from his official visit to China in November 2017, then-U.S. President Donald Trump disclosed that he had raised the cases of two high-profile detained individuals — underground church pastor Ezra Jin Mingri and imprisoned Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai — with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trump told reporters that Xi committed to giving serious consideration to Jin’s case, but characterized Jimmy Lai’s legal situation as a far more complex issue that would be difficult to resolve.

Jin, the leader of Beijing’s Zion Church, one of China’s largest unregistered house churches that operates outside of state-sanctioned religious frameworks, was taken into custody in October 2017. His detention was widely interpreted by international observers as part of a broader, escalating crackdown on unapproved religious practice across the country. “He said he’s gonna strongly consider the pastor,” Trump confirmed to reporters traveling with him.

In contrast to the tentative openness around Jin’s case, Trump noted that Xi described Jimmy Lai’s situation as a particularly “tough one.” Lai, a 78-year-old former media tycoon and founder of the now-shuttered pro-democracy outlet Apple Daily, has remained a vocal critic of the Chinese Communist Party and Beijing’s policies toward Hong Kong for decades. He was ultimately convicted in February 2021 on charges of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and publication of seditious material under the sweeping 2020 National Security Law imposed by Beijing on Hong Kong, and sentenced to 20 years in prison. His prosecution and the shutdown of his newspaper came in the wake of large-scale anti-government protests that roiled Hong Kong in 2019, and the crackdown that followed has effectively silenced most organized dissent in the former British colony.

Despite the very different outlooks Trump outlined for the two men, the families of both Jin and Lai have publicly expressed gratitude to the Trump administration for bringing their cases to the highest levels of diplomatic discussion. Grace Jin Drexel, Jin’s daughter, called the development nothing short of miraculous in a written statement to the Associated Press. “We could not be more grateful to President Trump and his skillful administration for pressing the case!” she wrote, adding that the family and supporters were “overjoyed” by the news.

Claire Lai, Jimmy Lai’s daughter, also thanked Trump for his administration’s commitment to advocating for her father’s release even amid Trump’s cautious assessment of the case. “He has earned his reputation as liberating the unjustly detained and I am confident he and his administration will be the ones to free my father,” she said in a message to the AP. She framed potential release of her father as a critical opportunity for Xi to demonstrate good will to the international community, calling it the only just and honorable course of action.

Human rights activists have long noted that under Xi Jinping’s leadership, Beijing has grown increasingly unwilling to release high-profile detainees detained over dissent or human rights-related activities. The most prominent recent example came in 2017, when Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo died of liver cancer in a Chinese hospital despite repeated calls from Western governments to allow him to travel abroad for life-saving treatment.

International observers widely view Jimmy Lai’s case as a symbolic marker of the erosion of civil liberties in Hong Kong, a outcome that runs counter to the autonomy and protections Beijing promised the territory under the 1997 handover agreement from British rule. Foreign governments including the United States and United Kingdom have repeatedly raised concerns about Lai’s detention and prosecution, though the Hong Kong government has repeatedly maintained that his conviction had no connection to press freedom, framing it as a standard criminal matter. Just days before Trump’s comments, China’s foreign ministry reaffirmed its position that Lai was a key organizer of anti-China activities intended to destabilize Hong Kong, and that all affairs related to Hong Kong are strictly China’s internal business, off-limits to foreign interference.

This report was compiled from contributions from Tang reporting out of Washington, with additional reporting from AP journalist Emily Wang in Washington.

15 5 月, 2026
From Nakba to genocide: A Gaza grandmother’s lifetime of loss and resilience

At 95 years old, Fatema Obaid carries a lifetime of trauma that few can imagine: she has survived two catastrophic displacement events, watched 70 of her family members killed in ongoing violence, and endured months of Israeli bombardment, systematic starvation, and repeated forced displacement across the Gaza Strip. Yet this grandmother, who first lived through the 1948 Nakba as a young girl, has rejected repeated Israeli military orders to leave Gaza City in the current conflict, warning that fleeing a second time would usher in an even crueler catastrophe than the one she endured 75 years ago.

Speaking from an unfinished apartment in western Gaza City, where she now shelters alongside her surviving grandchildren, Obaid framed the current violence as an escalation of the displacement and dispossession that began with the 1948 Nakba. “In the first Nakba, it is true that hundreds of thousands lost their land, homes and villages,” she told Middle East Eye in an interview published in 2026. “But in this Nakba, we have lost an entire history. We lost entire families, and entire generations have been destroyed for decades to come. What they could not do in 1948, they are doing now.”

Obaid was born and raised in Gaza City’s Shujaiya neighbourhood, close to the de facto border between Israel and Gaza that emerged after the 1949 armistice agreement. In 1948, Zionist militias launched widespread attacks on Palestinian towns and villages across historic Palestine, forcibly expelling some 750,000 Palestinians—roughly 75 percent of the territory’s Palestinian population—to make way for the creation of the state of Israel; an event widely categorized by scholars as ethnic cleansing. Obaid and her family were temporarily displaced for several months that year, but eventually returned to their home in Shujaiya, which remained outside Israeli control after the 1949 ceasefire.

More than 75 years later, Obaid has found herself reliving the same trauma of displacement, but this time with far greater brutality. She draws a sharp line between the 1948 catastrophe and the current war, arguing there is no comparison between the two events.

Obaid’s experience mirrors that of generations of Palestinians in Gaza. In 1948, tens of thousands of expelled Palestinians flooded into Gaza, expecting to return to their homes within days when the fighting ended. Instead, the enclave became a permanent, overcrowded refuge for displaced families. Today, around 1.6 million Palestinian refugees and their descendants—approximately 73 percent of Gaza’s total population—reside in the strip.

Since the start of Israel’s military campaign in October 2023, Obaid has been displaced more than 10 times. Her childhood home in Shujaiya and the entire surrounding neighborhood have been reduced to rubble, now incorporated into an Israeli-imposed no-go zone. “I have lived in Shujaiya since I was born. Even after marrying my cousin, I moved only a few streets away,” she recalled. “We fled for a few months in 1948 but eventually returned. Only during this Nakba did we lose our homes, our neighbourhood and all of eastern Gaza. They bombed our house and killed more than 70 members of my family—my sons, grandchildren, nephews, their children and many others from our extended family.”

Historical records place the Palestinian death toll from the 1947–1949 Nakba between 13,000 and 15,000. By comparison, Israeli forces have killed more than 72,000 Palestinians in Gaza over the past two years of the current campaign, with nearly two million residents displaced. Even after the recent ceasefire agreement, around 1.5 million Palestinians remain uprooted, most living in unsanitary makeshift tent camps across southern Gaza.

Shortly after Obaid was forced to flee Shujaiya for another part of Gaza City in October 2023, the Israeli military issued repeated mass expulsion orders ordering all northern Gaza residents to move south. When hundreds of thousands refused to comply, UN experts concluded that Israel imposed systematic starvation as “a savage weapon of war” to force Palestinians out of their territory. For months, Gaza City residents were cut off from basic supplies including wheat flour and clean drinking water, and the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification officially declared famine in Gaza City in August 2025.

Even amid this unrelenting hardship, Obaid has refused to leave Gaza City. “There were days when we could not find even a sip of water,” she said. “We counted every sip we drank, could barely find food, and were forced to flee from one place to another each time. It destroyed my health, but I did not want to leave Gaza City. I did not want to be buried outside it at the end of my life. I did not want to relive a catastrophe we have endured for nearly eight decades.”

Back in her Shujaiya home, Obaid had spent more than 80 years curating a collection of personal mementos that carried her life story: her long white wedding dress, the jackets and clothing of her late husband who died 20 years ago, cooking pots and gifts from her family and in-laws, and decades of personal savings. Every last one of these items was lost when she was forced to flee in panic. “Every time we fled, we fled in terror. We had no time to gather any belongings. We couldn’t even take a bottle of water with us. I escaped wearing only this same dress,” she said.

The only possession that survived both cataclysms is a pair of simple earrings that her father gave her as a young girl before the 1948 Nakba. “I have kept them all these years. I could never sell them or replace them, because they were once held in my father’s hands. They carry his memory with them. I never take them off, and that is why they have survived with me,” she explained. “They are the only thing left from before the Nakba. They survived two Nakbas, while so many members of my family were killed. These earrings are still alive.”

Obaid is among the dwindling number of remaining first-hand witnesses to the 1948 Nakba still living in Gaza who have lived through the current genocide. Since October 2023, Israeli attacks have killed at least 4,813 elderly Palestinians in Gaza, and many more have died from hunger, untreated chronic illness, and the total collapse of Gaza’s healthcare system amid Israel’s ongoing blockade and repeated forced displacement orders.

“People laugh when I say only one and a half of my sons are still alive; one who survived, and the other who was severely injured and is currently unable to walk,” Obaid said. She reflected on a lifetime marked by loss: her mother died shortly after she was born, and she has endured a lifetime of hardship, repeated displacement, and the death of most of her family. “At this age, I have lost my sons and many members of my family, endured starvation, and suffered repeated displacement,” she said. “But nothing is more painful than being uprooted from your own land and knowing that, after all these years, you will die in displacement.”

15 5 月, 2026
Hungary’s new PM symbolically removes fences erected around Orbán’s former offices

BUDAPEST, Hungary – In a highly symbolic act marking Hungary’s post-Orbán political transition, new Prime Minister Péter Magyar personally took down security fencing surrounding the former prime ministerial office on Budapest’s historic Castle Hill Friday, opening the landmark Karmelita building to public access after years of restricted entry. The former Catholic monastery, which commands sweeping views of the Danube River, became an indelible symbol of Viktor Orbán’s 16-year authoritarian-leaning rule after the former prime minister cordoned the site off from the public in 2021.

Standing before reporters as he pushed open the newly removed barriers, Magyar framed the move as a tangible break from the previous regime. “There is no place for cordons in Hungary after the change of regime,” he stated. Magyar emphasized that the site was constructed and renovated with public money from Hungarian taxpayers, making it rightfully belong to the people of the country rather than being locked away for exclusive government use.

Magyar and his center-right Tisza party swept to power in a landmark April election, ousting Orbán after 16 years in office and securing a two-thirds parliamentary supermajority that grants the new government a clear mandate to deliver on its promise of sweeping institutional reform. Since taking office, the new administration has already moved forward on key campaign pledges: rolling back the concentrated executive power Orbán built, restoring eroded democratic checks and balances, cracking down on widespread public corruption, and recovering misappropriated state funds from the previous era.

In a recent disclosure, the new government has already exposed details of luxury private renovations carried out on former government officials’ offices at public expense. Unlike his predecessor, Magyar plans to relocate the prime minister’s official office to the administrative district on the opposite bank of the Danube, leaving the Karmelita building open for public use while national authorities finalize a long-term plan for the site’s future.

The Karmelita building will remain open to visitors for an extended period, with an official booking website already launched to accommodate public tours. Magyar noted that several structures within the Castle Hill district have already completed long-delayed renovations, while other restoration projects are still ongoing. He added that opening the landmark to the public will likely spark new public discussions and ideas about how the site can best serve the Hungarian people going forward, though he declined to share specific proposals for its permanent use.

Beyond domestic institutional reform, Magyar has made mending frayed relations with the European Union a top foreign policy priority, with the explicit goal of restoring Hungary’s full standing within the community of Western democracies. To advance anti-corruption efforts, the new government plans to establish a specialized National Asset Recovery and Protection Office, which will be tasked with investigating allegations of misused public funds from Orbán’s tenure and working to recover stolen assets for the Hungarian state.

15 5 月, 2026
AI vigilante trap snares alleged paedophile ex-teacher in France

A high-stakes citizen sting operation leveraging artificial intelligence has landed a 66-year-old retired French sports teacher behind bars and ignited fierce public debate over the ethics of vigilante anti-pedophile action online.

Dominique B, a former official with France’s National Union of School Sports (UNSS), turned himself in to local police in eastern France on Tuesday, just 24 hours after a recording of his sexually explicit conversation with who he believed was a 14-year-old girl was streamed to thousands of viewers across major social platforms. What Dominique B did not know was that the young girl he was messaging was not a minor at all: the feminine face and voice he interacted with were entirely AI-generated, overlaid on the live feed of a male influencer who goes by the handle FINNYZYY, a content creator who specializes in public entrapment operations targeting alleged child predators.

Footage of the 40-minute exchange, which has now amassed more than one million views, shows Dominique B lounging in a chair on one side of the split screen, while FINNYZYY appears on the other with his AI-altered identity. Though the AI deepfake was not perfectly polished – the influencer had to cover the lower portion of his chin to conceal his beard – the deception was more than convincing enough to fool the retired educator. During the conversation, Dominique B propositioned the “minor” to meet him at Paris’ Parc des Princes football stadium, made explicit sexual requests including asking if she would kiss him and if she would view his nude body, and asked inappropriate questions about whether she had ever shared nude selfies with peers. When reminded that his conversation partner was only 14 years old, Dominique B brushed off the concern, claiming many girls younger than that had already had sexual intercourse.

The interaction was streamed live to an audience of more than 40,000 concurrent viewers, and multiple audience members quickly recognized the retired teacher and reported the content to Pharos, France’s official government platform for reporting harmful illegal online content. Before law enforcement could launch an official manhunt, Dominique B turned himself in at a local precinct.

Vesoul’s state prosecutor has confirmed that Dominique B faces two formal criminal charges: sexual solicitation of a person under 15 years of age, and soliciting pornographic images of a minor. Legal experts have noted that it remains unclear whether the fact that the target of his advances was an AI-powered decoy rather than an actual minor will impact the criminal proceedings or potential sentencing.

While the influencer says his operations are rooted in a mission to raise public awareness of the pervasive threat of child sexual exploitation, the case has sparked sharp division over the ethics of independent vigilante entrapment, particularly when AI is used to create fake identities. Legal commentator and lawyer Mourad Battikh has publicly criticized FINNYZYY’s methods as deeply concerning, arguing that the creator may be prioritized viral publicity over public safety. “If he truly wanted to act as a responsible citizen, he could have shared the recording directly with police rather than broadcasting it to millions online,” Battikh told French news channel BFMTV.

Aurélien Martini, a representative of the USM French magistrates’ union, echoed these concerns, noting that unregulated civilian vigilante operations risk compromising ongoing official law enforcement investigations into targeted suspects.

Despite pushback from legal professionals, the influencer has gained high-profile political support from France’s far-right National Rally party. Party deputy Jean-Philippe Tanguy praised the mobilization of civil society against child sexual abuse, arguing that established political institutions have failed to adequately address the crisis.

The case has also drawn new attention to the rapidly expanding capabilities of consumer-facing artificial intelligence tools, which have made it easier than ever for everyday users to create convincing deepfakes for everything from entertainment to activist vigilante operations.

15 5 月, 2026
Trump says he ‘made no commitment either way’ to Xi on Taiwan

Following two days of high-stakes bilateral talks in Beijing between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, the long-simmering Taiwan issue has once again taken center stage in U.S.-China relations, with Trump emerging with an intentionally ambiguous position that leaves key questions about Washington’s policy unanswered.

Traveling back to Washington aboard Air Force One, Trump confirmed to reporters that the topic of Taiwan dominated a large portion of his discussions with Xi. For decades, China has claimed the self-governing island of Taiwan as an inalienable part of its sovereign territory, and Beijing has repeatedly declined to rule out the use of military force to assert its control. Trump told reporters that Xi directly raised the question of whether the United States would come to Taiwan’s defense in the event of a conflict, a core query that cuts to the heart of cross-strait and U.S.-China tensions. In response, Trump said he avoided taking a clear position, telling Xi: “I don’t talk about that.”

The biggest immediate uncertainty created by the talks centers on a previously approved U.S. arms sales package to Taiwan, a deal that drew fierce condemnation from Beijing when it was announced late last year. The $8 billion package includes cutting-edge military hardware, from advanced rocket systems to a range of offensive and defensive missiles. Trump confirmed that he and Xi debated the proposed sale at length during the summit, and announced that he has not yet made a final decision on moving forward with the transfer. “I will make a determination over a fairly short period,” the U.S. president said, noting he plans to hold a conversation with Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te before finalizing his choice.

Washington’s long-standing approach to the Taiwan question has long required a delicate diplomatic balancing act. U.S. law formally mandates that the United States provide Taiwan with the necessary capabilities to defend itself, and the island has been an unofficial U.S. ally in the Indo-Pacific for decades. At the same time, successive U.S. administrations have worked to nurture diplomatic and economic ties with Beijing, avoiding explicit moves that would trigger full diplomatic rupture with China. This fragile balance has come under growing strain in recent years, as China has significantly expanded large-scale military exercises around Taiwan, stepping up pressure on the island’s government and stoking regional anxiety that has caught Washington’s attention.

According to Chinese state media coverage of the closed-door talks, Xi framed the Taiwan issue as the single most consequential matter shaping the future of U.S.-China ties. Xi warned that if the question is mismanaged, it could lead to direct confrontation and even open conflict between the two global powers. When asked by reporters whether he believed a conflict over Taiwan could break out between the United States and China, Trump downplayed the risk. “No, I don’t think so. I think we’ll be fine,” he said, adding that “[Xi] doesn’t want to see a war.” Trump also emphasized that Xi holds firm views on the issue, saying Xi “feels very strongly” about the island and does not support any move toward formal Taiwanese independence. Repeating his ambiguous position, Trump stated: “I made no commitment either way” on the core policy questions around Taiwan.

When pressed directly by reporters on whether the United States would defend Taiwan if it came under military attack, Trump again refused to give a clear answer. “I don’t want to say that. I’m not going to say that,” he said. “There’s only one person that knows that. You know who it is? Me.” He reiterated that Xi had directly asked him about the defense question during their bilateral meeting, and he had once again declined to outline a clear position.

For its part, Taiwan’s foreign ministry moved quickly to respond to the outcomes of the summit. Taiwanese Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung stated that the island’s diplomatic team had been closely monitoring all discussions between Trump and Xi throughout the summit, and that Taiwan has maintained open, steady lines of communication with the United States and other international partners. Lin said Taiwan’s priority is to ensure that its long-standing relationship with the United States continues to deepen in a stable manner, and that all of Taiwan’s core national interests are protected. He reaffirmed that Taiwan has consistently positioned itself as a defender of peace and regional stability in the Indo-Pacific, and placed blame for rising cross-strait tensions on Beijing, accusing China of escalating regional risk through what he called “aggressive military actions and authoritarian oppression.”

The summit’s outcomes leave the future of U.S. policy toward Taiwan unclear, with observers across the globe waiting for Trump’s upcoming decision on the arms sales package to signal which direction Washington will lean on the issue in the coming months.

15 5 月, 2026
Eurovision is almost here! But how much do you know about Europe’s biggest pop spectacular?

As the highly anticipated Eurovision Song Contest grand final rapidly approaches, fans across the globe are gearing up for one of the biggest cultural events in the international entertainment calendar. For those looking to get into the competitive spirit before the live show kicks off, a fun new challenge has emerged: put your Eurovision expertise to the test, and aim to walk away with a strong score – rather than the competition’s most infamous blank result, nul points.

For more than six decades, the Eurovision Song Contest has brought together musical acts from across Europe and beyond, captivating millions of viewers with its unique blend of catchy pop music, over-the-top stage productions, and cross-cultural celebration. Each year, the event builds for weeks of semi-finals before culminating in the iconic grand final, where 26 finalists compete for the coveted winner’s trophy, with viewers and professional juries from each participating country casting their votes to crown a champion.

Among the most recognizable phrases to come out of the contest is “nul points”, the French term for “zero points” that was historically announced when a country failed to earn any votes from other participants. Finishing with nul points is seen as the ultimate disappointment for competing acts, and has become a beloved part of Eurovision folklore among fans.

Now, ahead of this year’s final, the challenge invites fans to test their own knowledge of Eurovision history, iconic entries, past winners, and quirky contest facts to see if they can score high and avoid the humiliation of a nul points result on their own quiz. Whether you are a long-time superfan who has watched every contest for decades, or a first-time viewer tuning in for this year’s show, the quiz offers a lighthearted way to build excitement in the final hours before the grand final gets underway.

15 5 月, 2026
Watch: What did we learn from Trump’s visit to China?

After months of anticipation and diplomatic preparation, former U.S. President Donald Trump has wrapped up a condensed two-day official visit to Beijing, where he participated in a series of closed-door and public meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping focused on addressing a range of pressing bilateral and global issues. The summit, framed by observers as a high-stakes engagement, came amid a backdrop of shifting economic tensions, evolving geopolitical alignments, and shared global challenges that demanded direct dialogue between the world’s two largest economies.

During the visit, both leaders took the opportunity to lay out their respective policy priorities, exchange perspectives on long-standing bilateral sticking points, and explore areas where collaborative action could yield mutual benefits. While the short timeframe of the trip limited the scope for sweeping, breakthrough agreements, diplomatic insiders noted that the face-to-face interaction itself served a critical purpose: reducing the risk of miscommunication that can escalate into larger conflicts between the two nuclear-armed powers. Trade and economic relations, one of the core focal points of the discussions, saw both sides reiterate their commitment to fairer, more balanced commercial exchange, though concrete details of any new frameworks remained under wraps following the conclusion of the summit. Beyond economic issues, leaders also touched on regional security concerns, global climate action, and people-to-people exchanges that form the foundational layer of the bilateral relationship.

Foreign policy analysts have underscored that the visit marked a key moment in bilateral diplomatic engagement, highlighting the continued importance of direct, high-level dialogue even when disagreements persist. While the full outcomes of the talks will unfold in the weeks and months following the summit, the successful completion of the visit laid the groundwork for continued engagement between the two governments on issues that carry global implications.

15 5 月, 2026
Latin American nationals deported by the US to Congo face an uncertain future

Fifteen Latin American asylum seekers who were deported to the Democratic Republic of Congo under the former Trump administration’s hardline, widely panned migration crackdown are now stranded in a country they never knew existed, facing an impossible choice no protected refugee should ever have to make. For the 29-year-old Colombian woman at the center of this case, who spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation, what was supposed to be a search for safety after fleeing persecution has devolved into what she describes as an unending nightmare—an outcome far removed from Congolese President Félix Tshisekedi’s dismissive description of their situation as “living the Congolese dream.”

The Colombian woman’s account lays bare the severe human cost of the opaque third-country deportation deals the Trump administration struck with at least eight African nations. Legal experts widely frame these agreements as a deliberate legal loophole designed to bypass longstanding U.S. asylum protections. The woman’s case mirrors that of dozens of other deportees: she had already received a formal protection order from a U.S. immigration judge, which barred her forcible return to Colombia, where she faced threats from armed groups and ongoing abuse at the hands of a former government-linked partner.

Her journey to this crisis began in 2024, when she fled Colombia for Mexico, secured a U.S. border appointment through the official government system, and successfully established a credible fear of persecution at an Arizona port of entry that qualified her for asylum processing. For 18 months, she remained in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention, where she described routine dehumanization: repeated racist abuse from officers, punitive solitary confinement, revoked access to basic amenities like showers, and a complete loss of personal privacy even when using restroom facilities. In May 2025, a federal judge granted her formal protection under the U.N. Convention Against Torture, confirming she could not be safely repatriated to Colombia. She won her release from detention in February 2026 and relocated to Texas, where she was required to wear a GPS monitoring device as a condition of her release. But at her first routine check-in with ICE, she was taken back into custody immediately.

All officials told her was that a third country had agreed to accept her, she recalled. Less than three weeks later, she was strapped into a 24-hour charter flight to Congo—her destination was only disclosed to her 24 hours before departure. “When they told me they were going to deport me, I almost fainted,” she said. She and the 14 other Latin American deportees arrived in Kinshasa on April 17, their hands and feet shackled throughout the entire journey.

Since her arrival, the woman and the other deportees have been confined to a locked hotel compound near Kinshasa’s N’djili Airport, housed in tidy white bungalows with all current costs covered by the Congolese government, according to the UN-affiliated International Organization for Migration, which oversees the group’s daily management. Deported migrants are only permitted to leave the hotel compound once per week, and every trip is strictly chaperoned by IOM staff—there is no unsupervised movement, even for routine errands like grocery shopping or banking. “They choose where we go and what we buy,” the woman explained. While IOM has organized recreational activities including painting classes, music groups and volleyball matches, many deportees have lost interest in the repetitive routine. The woman spends most of her time alone in her room, making late-night calls to her 10-year-old daughter who remains in Colombia, constantly uncertain of when she will see her again.

With their three-month Congolese visas set to expire imminently, there is still no clear plan for their future, leaving the group in total legal and personal limbo. IOM has presented the woman with two unworkable options: accept “assisted voluntary return” to Colombia, where the U.S. judge already confirmed she faces extreme danger, or remain permanently in Congo with absolutely no financial, housing or social support from any agency. “What would one do in a completely unknown place, without a place to live and without knowing what to do?” she asked. She has experienced persistent stomach illness from the unfamiliar food, cannot speak French or Lingala—two of the most common languages in the country—and feels deeply unsafe in a setting that is entirely alien to her. “They treat us like we’re children,” she added. “The worst part is having to go through all of that without having committed any crime, simply for going to another country to ask for safety and protection.”

Alma David, the woman’s U.S.-based attorney, has condemned the entire process as a fundamental violation of U.S. domestic law and international human rights obligations. “By deporting them to a third country with no opportunity to contest being sent there, the U.S. not only violated their due process rights but our own immigration laws and our obligations under international treaties,” David explained. She noted that current ICE policy allows for deportation to any third country that provides blanket diplomatic assurances it will not persecute deportees, requiring no additional screening, no advanced notice to the deportee, and no individual risk assessment.

The full terms of the deal between the U.S. and Congo remain undisclosed. While other participating African nations have received millions of dollars in compensation for accepting deportees, Tshisekedi claimed earlier this month that Congo agreed to the arrangement as a free “act of goodwill between partners,” with no financial payment. Many regional analysts attribute Kinshasa’s willingness to comply to ongoing U.S. diplomatic pressure over the M23 rebel insurgency in eastern Congo, where Washington has openly condemned Rwanda’s support for the rebel group. Tshisekedi has downplayed the crisis, noting that the migrants are technically free to leave Congo at any time, and quipped that “they dreamed of living the American dream, and now they are living the Congolese dream.”

Congolese human rights organizations have rejected the agreement as a blatant violation of international refugee law. The Kinshasa-based Institute for Human Rights Research has described the migrants’ confinement as “arbitrary detention by proxy for the United States.” The AP’s investigation has already uncovered similar abuses across other participating African nations, including a gay Moroccan asylum seeker deported to Cameroon, where same-sex relations remain criminalized nationwide.

In response to requests for comment on the Colombian woman’s case, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security declined to answer specific questions. The agency has previously defended third-country deportation agreements, claiming they “ensure due process under the U.S. Constitution” and are a necessary tool to remove “criminal illegal aliens” whose home countries refuse to accept their repatriation. A recent U.S. court ruling that found the U.S. likely acted illegally in the deportation of another Colombian man to Congo has left the woman and her legal team uncertain what, if any, relief it will provide her case.

In a statement on its involvement, an IOM spokesperson confirmed the organization provides humanitarian assistance to deportees based on individual vulnerability assessments, including protection support, service referrals and general wellbeing outreach, but declined to share further details. The organization offers assisted voluntary return services that cover travel documents, flight costs, transit and temporary housing for those who agree to go back to their home countries, and has stressed it plays no role in selecting which migrants are deported. IOM also reserves the right to end its assistance if “minimum protection standards” are not met, the spokesperson added. For now, the Colombian woman remains trapped, cut off from her family and her future, with no clear path forward.

15 5 月, 2026
Trump says China agreed to buy 200 Boeing planes and signaled interest in as many as 750

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One while returning from his bilateral summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping, former U.S. President Donald Trump made a surprise announcement Friday: U.S. aerospace giant Boeing is set to secure its first major sale to China in nearly a decade, anchored by a 200-aircraft order. Trump added that the preliminary agreement includes a Chinese reservation for up to 750 Boeing aircraft total, a deal he framed as a key win from the high-stakes Beijing meeting.

Neither the Chinese government nor Boeing has issued an official statement confirming the proposed transaction, which would mark a critical turning point for the U.S. manufacturer, for whom China was once a core pillar of long-term global growth. Boeing Chief Executive Kelly Ortberg was among the cohort of top American business leaders who traveled with Trump to China, part of a broader delegation pushing to expand U.S. goods and services access to the massive Chinese market. Trump also noted the deal would deliver secondary gains to industrial conglomerate General Electric, which he says will supply between 400 and 450 aircraft engines for the order. GE Aerospace CEO H. Lawrence Culp also joined the presidential trip, but the company has not issued any immediate comment on the reported agreement.

The Trump administration has centered Boeing as a key asset in its broader strategy to revitalize American manufacturing in recent years, a push that already delivered large commercial jet orders from Qatar and Saudi Arabia during a 2023 Middle East presidential visit. Still, the lack of formal confirmation from all involved parties has left industry analysts cautious about the actual scope of any potential agreement. Bonnie Glaser, managing director of the German Marshall Fund’s Indo-Pacific program, noted that while many observers hoped the Xi-Trump summit would produce concrete, public deal announcements, the trip ended with deep uncertainty over the actual terms of any bilateral commercial agreements.

“All we have right now is the announcement the president made to the world that China agreed to this,” Glaser told reporters during a Friday media briefing. “We really have to wait for official numbers from Boeing or the Chinese government to confirm this. This is not an isolated case—we still have no concrete details on reported agreements for soy, liquefied natural gas, and beef either.”

For Boeing, a breakthrough in China could not come at a more pivotal moment. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, roughly one in every three narrowbody aircraft Boeing delivered globally went to Chinese operators. But that business collapsed sharply as geopolitical tensions drove a steady deterioration in U.S.-China trade relations over the past several years. Even ahead of the summit, Ortberg expressed optimism that any broad trade deal reached between Trump and Xi would open a meaningful new opportunity for Boeing, noting that the administration has prioritized supporting the company’s international growth efforts.

Ortberg stepped into the CEO role in 2024, a year marked by cascading crises for the 108-year-old manufacturer. In January 2024, an Alaska Airlines-operated 737 MAX suffered a mid-flight emergency when a door plug blew off the fuselage shortly after takeoff from Portland, Oregon, triggering widespread public and regulatory scrutiny over allegations of systemic production and quality control failures at the company, which sent its financial position under growing strain. Months later, the U.S. Department of Justice reopened a criminal investigation into Boeing linked to two deadly fatal 737 MAX crashes that killed 346 people between 2018 and 2019. The case ultimately concluded with a deferred agreement that saw Boeing pay an additional $1.1 billion in fines, victim compensation, and commit to sweeping internal safety and quality overhauls.

To cap off the turbulent year, more than 30,000 machinists at Boeing’s 737 MAX assembly facility in Renton, Washington, staged an eight-week work stoppage that stretched through the fall of 2024, disrupting production lines and piling further financial pressure on the already struggling company.

15 5 月, 2026
Prisoner swap goes ahead as Kyiv mourns 24 killed in Russian strike on flats

On Friday, as the Kyiv city government declared a day of mourning for 24 civilians killed in a devastating Russian missile strike, Russia and Ukraine carried out the first phase of a planned large-scale prisoner of war exchange, freeing 205 captives from each side. This dual development underscores the stark contradiction that continues to define the 2022 full-scale invasion: fleeting diplomatic progress toward de-escalation is consistently overshadowed by mounting civilian casualties and escalating military hostilities.

Hours before the POW transfer, Ukrainian rescue workers concluded a 28-hour search operation through the rubble of a nine-story residential apartment block in Kyiv’s southeastern Darnytskyi district, which was reduced to ruin by a Russian X-101 cruise missile attack launched Thursday. The strike completely destroyed 18 apartments and killed 24 people, among them three teenage girls – 12-year-old Lyubava Yakovleva, whose father had already been killed earlier in the war, and two 15-year-old girls. Lyubava’s older sister was initially reported missing before her death was confirmed, adding another layer of grief to the tragedy. Other fatalities included two postal workers, a kindergarten teacher, an English language instructor, and a former professional hockey player.

First responders and civilian volunteers, including 18-year-old Ivan who rushed to the site with his father, described chaotic scenes of smoke and fire as they pulled survivors from the debris. Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko confirmed that 30 people were rescued from the rubble. A day of mourning was held across Kyiv on Friday, and President Volodymyr Zelensky joined crowds of mourners laying flowers at the site of the destroyed building. Zelensky emphasized that the missile used in the attack had been manufactured in recent weeks, arguing that this proves Russia continues to evade international sanctions to import critical components for weapons production. “Russia deliberately destroys lives and hopes to remain unpunished,” Zelensky said, calling for increased international pressure on Moscow.

Parallel to the mourning in Kyiv, Russian officials reported that a Ukrainian drone attack on the city of Ryazan, located southeast of Moscow, killed four people including one child and injured 28 more. Governor Pavel Malkov said debris from downed drones damaged two residential apartment blocks, while a Ukrainian drone commander confirmed that the attack targeted Ryazan’s major oil refinery, one of the largest energy facilities in central Russia.

The POW exchange completed Friday marks the opening phase of a broader agreement to swap 1,000 prisoners from each side of the conflict, brokered jointly by the United States and the United Arab Emirates. Zelensky confirmed that most of the 205 released Ukrainian prisoners had been in Russian captivity since the early months of the full-scale invasion in 2022. Among those freed were fighters who defended the besieged port city of Mariupol, troops who held the Chornobyl nuclear plant in the opening weeks of the war, and service members from contested border regions. Russia’s defense ministry stated that the 205 released Russian prisoners have been transferred to Belarus for medical and psychological assessment.

The exchange was negotiated as part of a three-day ceasefire agreement between the two warring parties, which ran from May 9 to May 11, coinciding with Russia’s annual Victory Day holiday. The truce was marred by repeated violations from both sides from its start, and collapsed entirely earlier this week when Russian forces launched one of the largest combined drone and missile offensives of the entire war. Ukrainian defense officials reported that between May 13 and 14 alone, Russia launched 1,410 drones and 56 missiles targeting civilian and infrastructure sites across the country.

Despite Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recent comment that the war is “heading to an end,” no peace negotiations have been held between the two sides since February, and there is no visible indication of upcoming diplomatic progress. Ukrainian officials and political analysts have suggested the timing of the recent Russian escalation is intentional: it coincided with a planned visit by U.S. President Donald Trump to Beijing for talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping, and Zelensky accused Moscow of seeking to “disrupt the overall political atmosphere” ahead of the high-level meeting. The Kremlin has since announced that Putin will travel to China to meet with Xi “really soon” following Trump’s Beijing visit, with talks set to cover bilateral relations and pressing global issues.

15 5 月, 2026