作者: admin

  • Once shaped by court rituals, China’s imperial cuisine lives on today

    Once shaped by court rituals, China’s imperial cuisine lives on today

    Nearly a century after its founding, a historic Beijing restaurant remains one of the last guardians of China’s imperial culinary legacy, keeping alive dishes, rituals and handcrafting techniques that trace their roots directly to the palaces of the Qing Dynasty.

    One of its most beloved delicacies carries a story that stretches back to the final years of imperial rule. Legend holds that Empress Dowager Cixi once dreamed of a savory pancake late in her reign, and when the identical treat was served to her for breakfast the next morning, she was so delighted that she rewarded her head chef with a silver ingot. Originally named minced pork pancake, the dish was renamed “dream pastry” to honor its connection to Cixi’s vision, explains Zhou Tong, a veteran pastry chef at Beijing’s iconic Fangshan Restaurant.

    Founded in 1925 by former Qing Dynasty court chefs inside Beihai Park, a centuries-old imperial garden where dynastic royals once relaxed, conducted state affairs and held sacred rituals, Fangshan’s core mission is written directly into its name: Fangshan translates literally to “imitating imperial cuisine.” While a small number of other Beijing establishments also offer their own interpretations of imperial court dining, and the Palace Museum preserves Qing-era dining artifacts ranging from ornate pastry molds to serving vessels, Fangshan stands out for its commitment to passing down original recipes and techniques from generation to generation of chefs.

    Imperial cuisine is far more than a collection of fancy dishes: it encompasses the strict rituals that structured every meal, from the emperor’s daily breakfast to grand state banquets and sacred ceremonial feasts. For example, drinking milk tea was always the formal opening step at Qing Dynasty banquets, notes Teng Deyong, a researcher specializing in court culture at the Palace Museum. During grand events, the emperor would bestow portions of wine and food to assembled princes and high officials, and recipients were required to perform full formal rites of respect before they could partake.

    Sacrificial ceremonies, a core part of imperial court life, followed their own separate set of culinary rules. One of the most important Qing rituals, held at the Palace of Earthly Tranquillity inside the Forbidden City, centered on unseasoned boiled fatty pork. After the ceremony concluded, the pork was distributed to attendees, and receiving this sacrificial meat was considered a high honor. This tradition of unseasoned ritual food stretches back even further in Chinese cultural history: Wandi Wang, a professor of Chinese studies at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, points to the *Book of Rites*, an ancient Confucian text detailing ceremonial customs, which describes an unseasoned meat broth called “grand stew” served during sacrificial rituals.

    “The absence of added flavoring was itself meaningful: the unseasoned dish evoked an earlier and simpler way of cooking and thus expressed a ritual ideal of honoring antiquity and remembering cultural origins,” Wang explained.

    Pastries held a special place in imperial dining, with a dedicated palace institution solely responsible for crafting sweet and savory treats for the court. At Fangshan, Zhou still makes the original imperial versions of dream pastry and small steamed corn buns following century-old recipes, and servers share the dishes’ rich histories with every table. “People enjoy them even more because they carry such meaningful history,” Zhou said.

    His craft is passed down through an unbroken line of master-to-apprentice training, and traditional methods strictly require all work to be done by hand — no modern blenders or food processors are permitted. Beans are pulverized by hand using fine sieves, and specialty flours are mixed and aged in custom-made copper pots. “A machine may be more convenient, but the texture is completely different,” Zhou explained. “You lose the delicate graininess and sandy mouthfeel that handcrafted pastries are supposed to have.” That commitment to craft has paid off: pea flour cakes and red bean rolls, two of Fangshan’s most popular pastries, sell more than 200 orders per day during peak tourist seasons.

    For Fan Liangliang, Fangshan’s current executive chef, adapting to the restaurant’s traditional standards required unlearning everything he had been taught in modern culinary school. Instead of prioritizing speed and efficiency, he had to master slow, labor-intensive techniques unique to imperial cuisine, such as “Nizihuo” — a method that involves mincing ingredients like fish, shrimp or chicken into a smooth paste, then reshaping the paste into intricate decorative forms like frogs, birds or flowers.

    “This is one of the hallmarks of imperial cuisine,” Fan said. “Every dish had to be innovative, visually beautiful, nutritious and worthy of presentation on the imperial dining table.”

    As times have changed, the restaurant has made thoughtful adaptations to align with modern norms: rare, protected ingredients like bear paws are no longer served, and other ingredients have been substituted to fit contemporary availability and dietary preferences, all while retaining the core spirit and flavor of each original dish.

    Scholars note that Chinese culinary traditions have always carried layered meaning beyond sustenance, reflecting broader cultural, political and aesthetic values that evolve over time. Wang points to a famous poem by Tang Dynasty poet Du Fu, who wrote about cold noodles made from pagoda-tree leaves. “The poem is not simply a description of a dish,” Wang said. “Du Fu turns the verdant, fresh, yet modest dish into an expression of his political loyalty and thwarted ambition to serve the emperor.”

    “Preserving a culinary tradition begins with taking its history seriously,” Wang added. “Culinary heritage tells us not only how people ate in the past, but also how people in the present choose to remember and give meaning to that past.”

    Fan emphasizes that at its core, Fangshan’s imperial cuisine is a historic fusion of Manchu and Han Chinese culinary traditions, bringing together the food culture of the Qing Dynasty’s Manchu rulers and China’s Han majority. “It’s not simply a collection of dishes from the two cultures,” he said. “It represents the blending of their different approaches to food into a unified cuisine.”

    While core techniques like stir-frying, braising and stewing have remained intact, and some ingredients have been updated for accessibility and modern palates, the team’s commitment to preserving this unique cultural heritage remains unshaken. “When people dine at Fangshan Restaurant, I hope they experience more than just a meal,” Fan said. “They experience the weight of history.”

  • Israeli strike on Gaza port kills at least seven, including a child

    Israeli strike on Gaza port kills at least seven, including a child

    A deadly Israeli drone attack on a coastal cafe in Gaza City’s western port district has left at least seven Palestinians dead, one child among the victims, and sparked renewed scrutiny of Israeli military actions amid a fragile ceasefire framework, Gaza health authorities confirmed Tuesday.

    The brutality of the strike left one victim’s body so severely damaged that medical teams have not been able to identify the person, officials added. Most casualties, multiple of whom are in critical condition, were transported to Gaza’s al-Shifa Hospital, the territory’s largest medical facility. Al-Shifa initially received six corpses and 13 injured people, with a 13th wounded person dying of their injuries later the same evening. Hospital staff noted that one victim suffered a direct missile strike that left the body unidentifiable.

    According to Al Jazeera Arabic, the force of the blast threw several dead and injured people into the adjacent Mediterranean Sea, leading observers to warn that the final casualty count could climb higher than currently recorded as recovery operations continue along the coastline.

    One eyewitness, Mohammed Alghoul, told Agence France-Presse that Israeli military aircraft launched two missiles directly at the “Sweet and Bitter” cafe, a popular gathering spot located on Gaza’s fishermen’s port in the western part of the city.

    The Israeli Defense Forces confirmed the strike in a statement posted to the Telegram messaging platform, framing the operation as a “precise aerial strike” targeting several Hamas commanders in the Shati district west of Gaza City. The IDF claimed the group was plotting an attack against Israeli troops deployed inside the Gaza Strip, saying the airstrike was carried out “to remove the threat to the forces” and that Israeli forces had “taken steps to mitigate harm to civilians”. The military has not yet issued any comment on the dead child, nor has it released any evidence to back up its claims that the people killed in the cafe were Hamas commanders.

    Hamas condemned the attack, labeling it a “massacre” that exposes Israel’s open disregard for calls from U.S. President Donald Trump to uphold the existing ceasefire agreement between the two sides. The group has called on international mediators to ramp up pressure on Israel to honor the signed ceasefire deal and the previously agreed roadmap for peace.

    The targeted strike comes just 24 hours after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gave approval to the next phase of the U.S.-backed “Board of Peace” plan for Gaza, following talks that Netanyahu described as “deep and constructive” with a delegation led by U.S. Special Envoy Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law. The U.S.-brokered plan requires Hamas to fully disarm in exchange for a full Israeli military withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. Israel initially rejected Trump’s 15-point proposal even after Hamas agreed to lay down its weapons and transfer administrative control of Gaza to an independent technocratic governing body.

    As of Monday, medical sources in Gaza report that the total death toll in the territory has reached at least 73,399 people, with an additional 174,310 injured, since Israel launched its large-scale military campaign in October 2023. Of those fatalities, 1,265 have been killed since the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas went into effect in October 2025.

  • New Zealand blocks lawsuits against firms over climate harm

    New Zealand blocks lawsuits against firms over climate harm

    New Zealand’s right-wing coalition government has pushed through a divisive piece of legislation that blocks civil climate liability lawsuits against private companies, immediately ending a high-profile ongoing case against six of the nation’s largest corporations. The legal amendment passed its final parliamentary vote Tuesday night by a margin of 67 to 53, capping weeks of heated debate over the balance of government climate policy, corporate interests and public access to legal recourse.

    The legislation was drafted directly in response to a lawsuit brought by Indigenous Māori climate activist Michael Smith, who targeted six prominent New Zealand firms — including global dairy giant Fonterra — seeking to hold them legally accountable for their contributions to climate-related environmental harm. The new law retroactively halts Smith’s active case, a move that has drawn fierce condemnation from activists, opposition lawmakers and climate experts.

    Speaking to New Zealand’s national public broadcaster RNZ, Smith called the vote a dark turning point for democratic accountability in the country. “If parliament can cancel a live court case simply because it becomes politically inconvenient, then no legal claim is secure at all,” he argued. Opposition Green Party MP Steve Abel echoed that criticism in parliamentary debate, framing the change as a deliberate handout to corporate polluters at the expense of the public interest.

    “Six dirty polluters versus one activist — they had the best-paid, most skilled lawyers in the country and they still were losing the case,” Abel said. “So what did they do? They turned to this sitting government and begged them to extinguish the case, wipe it from the books, nullify it entirely.”

    Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith defended the government’s action, arguing that the legislation is necessary to create clarity for businesses around their climate obligations. He argued that ongoing High Court litigation over corporate emissions risked creating an ad-hoc regulatory framework that directly contradicts the national climate policy structure already enacted by parliament.

    “These ongoing claims create deep uncertainty for business confidence and domestic investment,” Goldsmith said in an official statement. “Climate change is a complex issue that intersects with environmental, economic and social priorities across the nation. It is not a matter that should be resolved piecemeal through individual court cases. Our national climate response is best designed and managed by the elected government at a national level.”

    The passage of the law comes as New Zealand faces growing pressure to step up its emissions reduction efforts, following a stark warning from an independent statutory climate advisory body last month. The Climate Change Commission, established by federal law in 2019, issued a report warning that current policies under Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s government put the nation at severe risk of missing its legally binding emissions reduction targets.

    The commission highlighted a series of controversial policy changes made by the current government that will increase overall national emissions: excluding the agricultural sector from emissions pricing, rolling back clean vehicle emissions standards, reducing mandatory emissions reporting requirements for businesses, and moving forward with plans to build a new liquefied natural gas import terminal. The report noted that the emissions increases from these policies will outweigh any emissions cuts achieved through other government programs.

    Commission chief executive Jo Hendy called the findings an urgent wake-up call for policymakers. “While emissions have declined gradually over recent years, progress stalled entirely in 2024,” Hendy said. “Current policy settings are simply not delivering the rate of reduction we need to hit our targets, and the window to correct course is now closing quickly.”

  • Sacked Ukrainian defence minister calls for presidential election

    Sacked Ukrainian defence minister calls for presidential election

    Nearly two and a half years into Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, a former top defense official has thrown the country’s domestic political landscape into upheaval, launching what analysts widely describe as the most significant test of President Volodymyr Zelensky’s authority since the war began.

    Mykhailo Fedorov, the 35-year-old former defense minister unexpectedly removed from his post in late July just six months after his appointment, publicly called for wartime national elections in a YouTube video posted Tuesday. Arguing that Ukrainian democracy must not become a casualty of Russian aggression, Fedorov framed the push as core to the country’s identity as a free European democracy, stating, “Ukraine is fighting precisely because we want to remain a free European state.” He did not mention Zelensky by name in his address.

    Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine has operated under continuous martial law, a legal framework that formally suspends all national electoral activity. In his video, Fedorov did not outline his own immediate political ambitions, instead centering his argument on the urgent need to establish what he called a “legal, safe, and realistic mechanism” to reinstate full democratic processes even amid ongoing active conflict. He went further to warn that Ukraine is currently grappling with a “systemic crisis of governance”, that the country’s leadership has become “scared of change”, and that persistent systemic corruption remains a major drain on the nation’s war effort.

    Fedorov’s dismissal in July sparked waves of public protests across multiple Ukrainian cities, and Zelensky has not yet issued a formal public response to the former minister’s latest remarks. Widely reported sources indicate Fedorov’s removal stemmed from long-running public and private tensions with then-Army Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi. In a chain of leadership shifts that followed, Syrskyi himself was replaced by Zelensky several weeks later, after mounting public pressure from protests targeting the presidency.

    During his short tenure as defense minister, Fedorov earned broad praise for overhauling the ministry’s operations, leading a high-profile anti-corruption purge, and leveraging data analytics to identify gaps and improve frontline military performance. This focus on innovation was not new: long before taking the defense portfolio, Fedorov served as Ukraine’s digital transformation minister, where he launched the volunteer “IT Army of Ukraine” to coordinate large-scale cyber operations against Russian targets in the immediate aftermath of the 2022 invasion. He later spearheaded the wildly successful “Army of Drones” fundraising initiative, which revolutionized Ukrainian military tactics by integrating drone technology into frontline operations, and even introduced a gamified reward system that awarded credits to units for successfully striking Russian targets.

    As defense minister, Fedorov doubled down on this high-tech approach, including a high-stakes request to SpaceX founder Elon Musk to restrict Russian access to Starlink satellite connectivity for drone operations. Military analysts credit that move with causing major disruptions to Russian frontline deployments and offensive advances. After his dismissal, Fedorov published a Facebook post summarizing his time in office, reaffirming his commitment to defeating Russia through asymmetric tactics, rapid innovation, and strong organizational reform.

    Following Fedorov’s removal, Zelensky appointed Yevgeniy Khmara, a low-profile career intelligence official, as acting defense minister. The president offered Fedorov alternative senior positions in the cabinet, including the role of deputy prime minister for military innovation, but Fedorov has publicly stated he will only accept a return to his former post as defense minister.

  • AFL coach reminds players of ‘expectations’ under ‘people lens’ in wake of Sydney Swans scandal

    AFL coach reminds players of ‘expectations’ under ‘people lens’ in wake of Sydney Swans scandal

    In the fallout of a major sexual assault allegation scandal that has rocked the Australian Football League, Hawthorn Football Club head coach Sam Mitchell has moved swiftly to ground his own squad, emphasizing that human respect and accountability will always take priority over on-field results.

    The controversy ignited early this week, following the Sydney Swans’ round win over Essendon at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. In the early hours of Monday morning, at a city hotel, an alleged sexual incident was reported to Victoria Police, who have launched a formal investigation into the claims.

    In response to the allegations, the Sydney Swans board made the unprecedented decision to stand down five of their senior players — Isaac Heeney, James Jordon, Chad Warner, Riley Bice, and Nick Blakey — for the remainder of the 2026 AFL season. The club confirmed the sanctions in an official public statement released Wednesday, noting that the Australian Football League leadership had signed off on the independent disciplinary measures, and that the club would not pre-empt the outcome of the ongoing police inquiry.

    “The AFL is supportive of the club’s sanctions. We respect there is an ongoing investigation by Victoria Police and the actions we have taken today are independent of this,” a Sydney Swans spokesperson said in the statement. Club chairman Andrew Pridham and chief executive Matthew Pavlich later addressed the media to elaborate on the board’s decision.

    With Hawthorn currently positioned to potentially face the embattled Swans in the opening round of the 2026 finals series, Mitchell called a mandatory team meeting on Tuesday to address the scandal with his playing group. The coach said the conversation centered on centering the needs of the alleged victim first, rather than focusing on the disruption the scandal has caused to the upcoming finals fixture.

    “We chatted with the players about it yesterday, and first and foremost I think the football stuff is so secondary to the alleged victims, in particular,” Mitchell told reporters. “We put the people lens, first and foremost, and the people involved, the alleged victims, that’s sort of where our thinking goes. The footy side of it we put aside and it’s obviously a police investigation and AFL and the Swans, let them deal with that side of things. But we had a chat with our players about remembering the expectations we have on ourselves and making sure we continue to live up to them.”

    The scandal has sent shockwaves through the AFL community just weeks out from the end of the regular season, prompting questions about player conduct off the field and club accountability moving forward.

  • Trump envoy ‘deeply concerned’ by Israeli strikes on Syrian air base

    Trump envoy ‘deeply concerned’ by Israeli strikes on Syrian air base

    In the wake of an Israeli air strike targeting the Abu al-Duhur military air base in northern Syria, the United States’ special envoy for Syria, Tom Barrack, has publicly broken with common US framing to defend the new Syrian administration, labeling the attack an unnecessary escalation of regional tensions.

    Barrack, who met one day prior with Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani in Istanbul, Turkey, laid out his assessment in a public post on the social platform X. “The Al-Sharaa government has neither adopted a predatory posture nor maintained proxy forces,” he wrote. “It has, in fact, repeatedly indicated a preference for de-escalation with Israel.” Barrack added that Washington views the strike with deep concern, noting “[This] does not advance regional stability.” While Israeli officials have not officially acknowledged responsibility for the attack, Barrack explicitly confirmed Israel carried out the operation.

    Details released by the Syrian government confirm that eight precision strikes targeted the runway of the currently defunct air base in the early morning hours of Tuesday, local time. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights later contextualized the strike, noting that the attack came days after a Turkish military delegation visited the airfield as part of ongoing efforts to reactivate the facility for operational use.

    The strike is part of a consistent pattern of Israeli military activity inside Syria following the December 2024 departure of former president Bashar al-Assad, who fled to Russia amid a government transition. Since that leadership change, Israel has launched repeated strikes on targets across northern Syria and along the country’s western border, with a stated goal of degrading what remains of the Syrian Air Force. Israeli ground forces have also pushed into the UN-patrolled buffer zone that has separated the two countries under the terms of a decades-old disengagement agreement.

    Despite this sustained military pressure, Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa confirmed last year that indirect diplomatic talks have been held between the two neighboring states. Syria and Israel have not maintained formal diplomatic relations since the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, when Israel seized control of Syria’s Golan Heights and later unilaterally annexed the territory in a move not recognized by the international community. Under the rule of former president Hafez al-Assad, the two sides signed a 1974 disengagement agreement that established a formal border security regime to reduce the risk of open conflict.

    In comments previously given to The Washington Post, Sharaa explained his administration’s deliberate choice to avoid immediate retaliation for the thousands of Israeli air strikes that have hit Syrian territory in recent years. “Because we want to rebuild Syria, we didn’t respond to these aggressions,” he said. Sharaa also pushed back on Israel’s longstanding justification for its strikes, the claim that it targets Iranian-aligned Shiite militant proxies operating inside Syria. “we are the ones who expelled those forces out of Syria,” he noted, adding that Israeli incursions into Syrian territory stem not from legitimate security concerns but from clear expansionist ambitions.

    Just last month, Foreign Minister Shaibani issued a formal condemnation of ongoing Israeli military activity, warning that Israel’s unlawful occupation of Syrian territory beyond the 1974 disengagement line poses a direct threat to overall regional security. Israeli officials reaffirmed as recently as last week that they intend to keep military forces deployed inside Syrian territory indefinitely.

    Outlining the United States’ formal policy position on Tuesday, Barrack said Washington would continue to facilitate diplomatic discussions to encourage both nations to prioritize dialogue over military confrontation. “The United States has in the past, and will continue in the future, to host discussions to encourage diplomatic cadence over kinetic frustration for both nations,” Barrack said. “The United States continues to believe that restraint and engagement offer the more constructive course. We encourage all parties to prioritize logical discourse over further military incidents.”

  • Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino addresses National Press Club amid superannuation call

    Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino addresses National Press Club amid superannuation call

    Australia’s Albanese government has firmly rejected two high-profile changes to the nation’s superannuation system pushed by One Nation: raising the mandatory employer superannuation guarantee from 12% to 15%, and expanding early access to retirement savings to help households cope with the ongoing cost of living crisis. The policy clash comes on the heels of the high-profile 2025 collapse of two major industry superannuation funds, Shield and First Guardian Master Funds, which has left roughly A$1 billion in member savings in limbo.

    Addressing the National Press Club in Canberra on Wednesday, Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino described the collapse of the two funds as a deeply troubling event that has upended the financial security of thousands of Australian households. Speaking to ABC Radio National Breakfast ahead of the address, Mulino detailed the harm inflicted by the failure: nearly 12,000 individual fund members and their families have lost large portions of their retirement savings, with some losing their entire accumulated balances. He condemned what he called “predatory and inappropriate” industry practices that led to the collapse.

    Despite calls from crossbench lawmakers to revisit legislated increases to the superannuation guarantee, Mulino ruled out any plans to lift the mandatory rate from its current 12% to the proposed 15%. He noted that reaching the 12% benchmark required decades of sustained effort from successive Labor governments, which fought intense opposition from conservative parties to secure the current framework. Mulino argued the 12% guarantee, applied consistently across a worker’s entire career, will deliver robust retirement balances for millions of Australians, with results already visible in the national super system.

    Beyond individual financial security, Mulino emphasized that the current 12% guarantee delivers major systemic benefits, easing long-term fiscal pressure on Australia’s public pension system. Official data and long-term projections already bear out this impact, he said, while also providing individual workers with an extra layer of financial safety in retirement that cannot be replicated by public benefits alone. “That is a very important and strong part of our system,” Mulino added.

    The government’s firm rejection of reform comes as One Nation steps up pressure to loosen access rules for superannuation, framing expanded early withdrawal as a solution to soaring household costs driven by the cost of living crisis. One Nation treasury spokesman Barnaby Joyce argued that superannuation savings are private property, not a collective national asset, and that households facing financial hardship deserve simpler, broader access to their own funds.

    “When you need access to your money because you can’t pay your groceries, or you’re going to get booted out of your house, that it’s not as arduous as what it’s been made,” Joyce told News24. Pushing back against criticism that early withdrawals would erode long-term retirement savings by breaking compound interest growth, Joyce noted that losing a home to eviction or foreclosure carries far greater long-term financial costs for vulnerable households. He added that there should be no overly restrictive limits on what Australians can use early super withdrawals for, arguing that covering emergency housing costs like rent is a perfectly legitimate use of a person’s own savings.

    Joyce also launched a scathing attack on the Albanese government for its rejection of One Nation’s proposal, repeating prior criticisms of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to question the government’s credibility, and insisting the party has no intention of abolishing the superannuation system entirely. The debate over superannuation policy is set to intensify in coming weeks as the government faces ongoing pressure to address cost of living pressures across the country, with more details expected to emerge as the discussion develops.

  • After deadly floods in India’s Assam, experts call for better warnings and long-term planning

    After deadly floods in India’s Assam, experts call for better warnings and long-term planning

    GUWAHATI, India — In the remote village of Hulang Katoni in India’s northeastern Assam state, what began as a routine errand on July 19 ended in a devastating loss. When heavy monsoon rains cut power to his home, Rojo Neog set out on his bicycle to buy candles. By the time he headed back, the swelling Dikhow River, a major tributary of the Brahmaputra, had surged beyond its banks with terrifying speed. Floodwaters tore Neog away, and his family recovered his body three days later.

    Neog’s death is one of more than 100 fatalities linked to this year’s catastrophic flooding in Assam, an event state officials have labeled the worst the region has seen in nearly 60 years. For Neog’s niece Priyakshi Gogoi, the disaster was not just deadly, it was shockingly sudden. Flood levels near the village jumped from knee-deep to neck-deep in just 30 minutes, she said, and no advance warning reached the community. “In the morning we thought it’s fine, there is little flooding but it will subside, but we didn’t expect it to become so bad,” Gogoi told reporters.

    The tragedy repeats across hundreds of flood-ravaged communities in Assam. Just kilometers away in Nepalikhuti village, 42-year-old Krishna Karamkar lost his life saving his 12-year-old son, who had accidentally stepped into the churning overflowing Dikhow. Karamkar pulled his son to safety but was swept away by the powerful current, leaving his wife Sumi Karamkar to navigate an uncertain future. “I have received some assistance from the government but that’s not enough. Our family’s future has suddenly become so uncertain,” she said. Nepalikhuti is one of the hardest-hit villages, reporting more than 1,000 livestock washed away and 200 homes completely destroyed.

    Across the state, the full scale of the disaster is staggering: more than 700,000 people have been displaced, thousands are still sheltering in overcrowded relief camps even as waters slowly recede, vast swathes of farmland have been submerged, and critical road and utility infrastructure has been heavily damaged. Local resident Shravan Kumar, 26, from Bihubor village, described rushing his elderly parents to higher ground before returning with five small boats to rescue trapped neighbors. “People were clinging to trees, and rescuers had to break through a home’s roof to pull out two children and their parents,” Kumar said. “I have grown up in the area and have never seen such severe flooding before.”

    For dairy farmer Prakash Sharma in Nepalikhuti, the surge caught the village completely off guard. By 10 a.m. on the day the flood hit, the only road connecting the village to the outside world was already underwater. By mid-afternoon, the entire settlement sat under roughly 9 feet of churning water, forcing residents to climb to rooftops and tree canopies for safety. Rescuers pulled Sharma and his family out that same day, but he is still reckoning with catastrophic losses. “For me, it was not just floods, it was a natural calamity of humongous proportion we had never seen before,” he said.

    While seasonal flooding during the June-to-September monsoon has long been a fact of life in Assam — where roughly 40% of the land is inherently vulnerable to inundation from the Brahmaputra river system — climate and disaster experts warn that floods are growing far more unpredictable, destructive, and deadly due to a mix of human-caused climate change and harmful land use practices. Each year, monsoons bring critical moisture that cools the country, irrigates farms, and replenishes river systems, but rising global temperatures have made rainfall far more erratic and intense, creating the conditions for extreme flood events. India, one of the world’s top greenhouse gas emitters, is also one of the countries most vulnerable to the accelerating impacts of climate change.

    A recent analysis from World Weather Attribution (WWA) confirmed that unplanned rapid urbanization, upstream deforestation, unregulated sand mining, widespread wetland loss, and overreliance on hard engineering flood control structures have dramatically worsened risk across Assam and neighboring northeastern states. The Brahmaputra and its tributaries naturally carry massive volumes of sediment eroded from the Himalayas, constantly reshaping their channels, banks, and river islands, meaning seasonal flooding can never be fully eliminated. But human alteration of the natural landscape has overwhelmed the river system’s capacity to absorb heavy rain, leaving communities with almost no time to react when waters surge.

    For decades, Assam has poured millions of dollars into building embankments, flood walls, and erosion-control structures to hold back rivers. Experts agree this infrastructure still serves a purpose in densely populated areas, but they warn it creates new risks when it replaces natural flood absorption systems like forests, wetlands, and floodplains. While India has expanded national flood forecasting and early warning systems in recent years, researchers say critical gaps remain: warnings often get stuck in government bureaucracy and never reach at-risk rural communities, and even when alerts are delivered, there is rarely sufficient preparedness planning or accessible safe shelter for residents.

    “India is very good at rescuing people or providing relief after the disaster, but is particularly bad in doing anything significant to reduce the possibilities of such disasters,” said Himanshu Thakkar, coordinator of the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People, an environmental advocacy group. “It’s very important to study and understand flood risks better in Assam. Once we understand, we can also forecast well. Then we can prepare well and less people will be affected.”

    Experts are now calling for a fundamental paradigm shift in how India manages flood risk, moving beyond a focus on building infrastructure to control rivers toward a strategy of working with natural systems and living with seasonal flooding. “True adaptation requires moving towards living with rivers through wetland restoration and proactive early action before floodwaters strike,” said Emmanuel Raju, director of the Copenhagen Centre for Disaster Research at the University of Copenhagen and a co-author of the WWA report.

    Independent researcher Mirza Zulfiqar Rahman, who has spent years studying the Brahmaputra basin, noted that flood risk management must cross administrative boundaries, since upstream changes including deforestation, mining, and urban development directly impact downstream water flow and sediment levels in Assam. “Flood planning should follow the natural contours of river basins rather than state and international borders,” he said, adding that disaster policy remains far too focused on post-flood response rather than pre-flood risk reduction.

    Climate change is already pushing flood events beyond the adaptive limits of communities that have lived with seasonal inundation for centuries, said Nihal Ranjit, a climate and disaster expert at the Indian Institute for Human Settlements. Historically, communities in flood-prone areas structured their farming and daily routines around seasonal flooding, but more frequent extreme events are making that traditional adaptation unworkable, driving rising displacement. “This always existed, but climate change and climate impacts like floods are increasing this movement,” Ranjit noted.

    Reporting for this story was contributed by Sibi Arasu from Bengaluru, India. The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations, with AP retaining full editorial control over all content.

  • South Korea says the South Korean and US militaries have agreed to shorten their drills

    South Korea says the South Korean and US militaries have agreed to shorten their drills

    In a move that has sent ripples through Northeast Asian security dynamics, South Korean government officials confirmed Wednesday that the joint military exercises between South Korean and United States forces will be cut short, a change implemented at Washington’s formal request. This adjustment comes just days after former U.S. President Donald Trump issued a directive to downsize the long-planned drills.

    The annual Ulchi Freedom Shield summer drills kicked off on Monday morning, originally scheduled to run for 11 days through August 27. The drills were already slated for adjustment immediately after Trump ordered the U.S. Secretary of Defense to enact “substantial” cuts to the exercise program. In explaining his decision, Trump pointed to two key factors: what he described as a productive, positive personal relationship with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, and South Korea’s decision not to participate in the U.S.-led military conflict against Iran.

    In an official statement released this week, South Korea’s defense command confirmed that the ongoing combined exercises will now wrap up on Friday, a significant reduction from the original timeline. Beyond cutting the overall length of the main drills, the two allied nations have also reached an agreement to scale back the scope of several joint field training components that were part of the scheduled exercise package.

    The sudden downsizing of the exercises has drawn sharp scrutiny from defense analysts across the globe. A large number of regional security experts have warned that Trump’s last-minute order risks eroding the combined combat readiness that U.S. and South Korean forces have built up through decades of regular joint training. In the long term, they argue, repeated adjustments of this nature could weaken the foundation of the bilateral security alliance that has anchored Northeast Asian security for over 60 years.

    As of Wednesday, North Korean officials had not issued a direct public response to Trump’s decision to scale back the drills. However, earlier the same day, the country’s official state news agency released a strongly worded denunciation of the U.S.-South Korean exercise as a whole, labeling the drills “frantic” and “extremely dangerous.” The statement included a formal vow that North Korea would work to completely thwart what it called the hostile actions of its regional rivals.

  • Republican Byron Donalds and Democrat David Jolly to face off in race to replace Ron DeSantis

    Republican Byron Donalds and Democrat David Jolly to face off in race to replace Ron DeSantis

    As the United States gears up for the November general elections that will determine control of Congress, primary voting has wrapped up across three key states, with projected results already painting a clearer picture of the upcoming battles for statewide and federal offices.

    In Florida, America’s third most populous state, major projections from leading national media outlets including CNN and The Associated Press point to Republican U.S. Representative Byron Donalds and former Republican turned Democratic candidate David Jolly emerging as the winners of their respective gubernatorial primaries. With roughly 89% of all ballots counted, the two candidates are now set to face off in November’s general election to fill the seat being vacated by term-limited incumbent Governor Ron DeSantis.

    Donalds, a high-profile conservative Congressman, secured the critical endorsement of former President Donald Trump ahead of the primary. He outpaced a crowded Republican field that included right-wing challenger James Fishback, who drew notable attention from young conservative voters through his provocative public statements and aggressive social media-focused campaign strategy. For Democrats, the path to the general election has been far less straightforward: the party has not held the Florida governor’s mansion since 1999, and Jolly, a well-known Trump critic who left the Republican Party to run as a Democrat, had to defeat multiple primary opponents including state legislator Dotie Joseph and criminal justice reform advocate Evelyn Castillo-Bach to claim the projected nomination.

    Beyond the governor’s race, Florida voters also cast ballots in primaries for U.S. Senate and all of the state’s U.S. House seats. In the Senate race, Republican incumbent Ashley Moody is seeking her first full term after being appointed to fill the vacancy left by Marco Rubio, who stepped down to become U.S. Secretary of State. On the Democratic side, the primary has exposed ongoing intraparty divides between progressive and moderate factions: state Representative Angie Nixon is running as the progressive standard-bearer, while Alex Vindman — the former White House official who testified during Trump’s first impeachment inquiry in 2019 before being fired from the National Security Council — is positioning himself as the moderate alternative.

    One of the most closely watched House contests in the state played out in Florida’s 7th Congressional District, where political newcomer Ryan Elijah has been projected to defeat incumbent Republican Congressman Cory Mills in the GOP primary. The race drew national attention after Mills was hit with a House Ethics Committee investigation and public allegations of domestic abuse, which he has repeatedly denied. Even sitting Governor DeSantis, a fellow Republican, opted to distance himself from Mills, declining to issue an endorsement ahead of the primary.

    Thousands of miles away on the opposite coast, Alaska held its own competitive Senate primary, where the race gained unusual attention from an unexpected source: a little-known challenger who shared the incumbent’s name. Incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan was forced to compete against Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., a little-known candidate who shared nearly the same name. Despite legal efforts to remove the namesake challenger from the ballot, both candidates appeared on the primary ballot, differentiated only by the incumbent’s “incumbent” label and the challenger’s “Jr.” suffix. Political analysts have noted that even with the clear labeling, the identical name could siphon off enough votes from the sitting senator to shake up the race in a state with a small overall voting population. Under Alaska’s election rules, the top four vote-getters regardless of party affiliation advance to the November general election, and Democrats are banking on their candidate, incumbent U.S. Representative Mary Peltola, to flip the seat and help the party take control of the U.S. Senate.

    Further inland in Wyoming, a deeply red state where the outcome of the Republican primary is widely seen as a predictor of the November general election result, voters are choosing a new governor after incumbent Mark Gordon hit his term limit. Three Republican candidates — Megan Degenfelder, Eric Barlow, and Brent Bien — are competing for the GOP nomination, while Democrat Kenneth Casner is running unopposed for his party’s spot on the general election ballot. Voters are also selecting a new U.S. Senator following the announced retirement of incumbent Cynthia Lummis, with former President Trump throwing his weight behind Republican U.S. Representative Harriet Hageman for the open seat.