作者: admin

  • University suspends academic behind Jason Arday plagiarism charges

    University suspends academic behind Jason Arday plagiarism charges

    In a development that has rocked academic circles across the Atlantic, Belgium’s Ghent University has suspended an American postdoctoral researcher who led high-profile plagiarism accusations against Jason Arday, the former University of Cambridge black professor who was found dead last week just days after resigning amid the growing controversy.

    The academic in question, Nathan Cofnas — a self-identified “race realist” who was dismissed from a position at Cambridge two years ago — announced his suspension via social media platform X, writing, “I was just suspended by Ghent University. They will almost certainly fire me.”

    In an official statement released Thursday, Ghent University confirmed it had opened a preliminary disciplinary investigation into the postdoc tied to the unfolding scandal, opting to suspend the researcher as a precautionary measure, though it did not explicitly name Cofnas in the announcement. The institution’s leadership has already stressed that while it upholds core commitments to academic freedom and open debate even around controversial views, that freedom is not absolute: it must be paired with personal responsibility, and can be limited to safeguard the dignity and rights of others.

    The tragedy at the center of this disciplinary action is the death of 41-year-old Arday, who made history in 2023 when he became Cambridge’s youngest-ever black professor. Arday, who was diagnosed with autism and other developmental conditions in childhood, had been facing a cascade of claims that he plagiarized segments of his doctoral thesis and inflated key personal and professional achievements. He had forcefully denied all accusations, but ultimately stepped down from his post on August 5, writing in his resignation letter that he had “reached the limits of what any person should reasonably be expected to endure.” One week later, he was found dead.

    Plagiarism concerns around Arday first emerged years ago, but the claims never gained traction at that time: one reporter who pursued the story abandoned further investigation after Arday threatened legal action. That changed last month, when Cofnas publicly came forward to allege he had uncovered dozens of instances of plagiarism in Arday’s academic work. The claim rapidly snowballed into a national scandal in the UK, earning blanket media coverage on both sides of the Atlantic.

    The row quickly became politicized, with British right-wing media and commentators leveraging the accusations to argue that Arday had secured his prestigious position through unfair advantage gained by university diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI) policies. Following Arday’s death, Ghent University moved quickly to address public concern over Cofnas’ involvement, releasing an initial statement Wednesday saying it was “shocked” by the professor’s passing and took all public statements from its researcher “very seriously.”

    The institution’s leadership reaffirmed its values in that initial statement, noting, “Ghent University stands for respect for human dignity and opposes discrimination, hatred and racism. We attach great importance to academic freedom and to open academic debate, even when views are controversial. However, that freedom is not unlimited. It goes hand in hand with responsibility and may be restricted in order to protect the rights of others.”

    Now, the university says it is in the process of assessing whether there is sufficient evidence to move forward with full formal disciplinary proceedings against Cofnas, a step that could ultimately lead to his termination from the institution.

  • US Treasury sanctions Ecuador-to-US cocaine trafficking network

    US Treasury sanctions Ecuador-to-US cocaine trafficking network

    QUITO, ECUADOR – In a major escalation of joint counter-narcotics efforts between the United States and Ecuador, the U.S. Treasury Department announced sanctions Thursday against 15 individuals linked to a sophisticated transnational drug network that moves thousands of kilograms of cocaine from Ecuador to U.S. consumers every month, via Mexican smuggling routes. The new measures come as the Trump administration expands joint anti-trafficking operations across Latin America, a campaign that has already seen intensified strikes against suspected traffickers operating as fishermen in the Caribbean and Pacific, resulting in more than 200 deaths to date.

    According to details released by the Treasury Department, the network conceals its illicit activities behind the facade of registered commercial fishing operations. Based near the strategic Ecuadorean port of Manta, the smuggling ring uses locally registered vessels to transfer large cocaine shipments to high-speed “go-fast” power boats, which then carry the contraband north through the Eastern Pacific Ocean toward U.S. territory.

    All 15 sanctioned individuals are tied to two major Ecuadorean criminal groups, Los Choneros and Los Lobos – both already formally designated as foreign terrorist organizations by the U.S. government. After the cocaine is moved north from Ecuador, the network partners with two infamous Mexican cartels, the Sinaloa Cartel and Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG), which are also listed as U.S. foreign terrorist organizations, to move the drugs across the Mexico-U.S. border for distribution.

    Ecuador has faced a spiraling crisis of drug-related violence since 2021, as major international cartels form alliances with local street gangs to fight bloody turf wars for control of smuggling routes and Pacific coastal ports. The country’s geographic position, wedged between Colombia and Peru – the world’s two largest cocaine producing nations – has made it an unavoidable transit hub for cocaine bound for North America and Europe. Last year, the crisis pushed Ecuador’s homicide rate to a 50-year high of 50 murders per 100,000 residents, according to official data from the country’s Ministry of the Interior.

    Under the leadership of recently elected President Daniel Noboa, Ecuador has emerged as a key regional partner for the Trump administration’s anti-drug campaign. On the same day the Treasury sanctions were announced, Ecuadorean Defense Minister Gian Carlo Loffredo confirmed that two U.S. warships equipped with interceptor boats and helicopters will begin patrolling Ecuador’s territorial waters to support counter-trafficking operations. Loffredo made the announcement on his personal Instagram account, following a Wednesday meeting in Manta with General Francis Donovan, head of U.S. Southern Command. The defense minister did not share a specific timeline for when the patrols will launch.

    Loffredo emphasized that the new collaboration will drastically boost Ecuador’s ability to intercept drug shipments at sea, telling reporters that the cooperation will triple the country’s interdiction capacity in its maritime zones. He added that three U.S. Black Hawk helicopters have already arrived in Manta and are preparing to join operational activities. The Associated Press requested additional details about the joint patrol plan from U.S. Southern Command, but did not receive an immediate response Thursday.

  • ARN Media slumps to $28m loss amid Kyle and Jackie O legal costs

    ARN Media slumps to $28m loss amid Kyle and Jackie O legal costs

    Australian Radio Network (ARN), the operator of popular national radio networks including KIIS and Gold Network, has reported a sharp downturn in its first-half financial results, driven by massive costs tied to the abrupt cancellation of its top-rated flagship program, *The Kyle and Jackie O Show*. The regional and metropolitan radio broadcaster revealed in its latest half-year earnings update that total revenue dropped 14% year-over-year to AU$126.8 million, while net losses surged to AU$28.3 million. Company executives confirmed that the overwhelming majority of this loss stems from impairment charges and mounting legal fees that followed the show’s cancellation in March 2024.

    The chain of events that led to the show’s axing began in February 2024, when an on-air public dispute between co-hosts Kyle Sandilands and Jackie ‘O’ Henderson triggered an internal crisis for the network. At the time of cancellation, *The Kyle and Jackie O Show* was ARN’s highest-rated morning program, boasting a large loyal audience across major Australian markets including Sydney and Melbourne. But according to ARN chief executive Michael Stephenson, the program failed to translate its high listener numbers into sponsor interest, while persistent brand safety concerns created lingering risks for advertising partners.

    “While first half revenue was impacted by residual brand safety issues in KIIS Breakfast and the Federal Election in the prior year, ARN’s underlying audience position remains strong and our immediate priority is to regain metro radio revenue share,” Stephenson said in the earnings release. He also confirmed that new breakfast shows for both the Sydney and Melbourne KIIS markets will launch in early 2025, as the network works to rebuild its morning slot revenue.

    Following the cancellation, both Sandilands and Henderson launched legal claims against ARN Media over their exit from the network. Sandilands reached a settlement with the company for AU$13.5 million, while legal proceedings involving Henderson remain ongoing. In a surprising post-exit arrangement, ARN has retained a financial stake in Sandilands’ future media projects: the network will take a 19.9% cut of net revenue from all of his new ventures for up to three years.
    ARN Media chairman Hamish McLennan framed the company’s poor half-year results as a necessary growing pain, noting that the decision to cancel the show was a long-term strategic move to reset the business. “While the first half result is not where we want ARN to be, the board is clear that the decisions being made now are the right decisions to change the trajectory of the company,” McLennan said in the official results statement. “ARN exits the first half as a leaner, financially stronger and more focused organisation.” Industry analysts are now watching closely to see whether the network’s new breakfast programming can reverse the revenue slump and win back lost advertising market share in key metropolitan markets.

  • Key European leaders demand Israel halt West Bank settlement project

    Key European leaders demand Israel halt West Bank settlement project

    In a sharp rebuke that amplifies global pushback against Israeli settlement expansion, four of Europe’s leading powers — France, Italy, Germany, and the United Kingdom — issued a joint statement Thursday demanding Israel immediately withdraw plans to construct over 1,200 new residential units as part of the contentious E1 settlement project in the occupied West Bank. The development comes just days after Israeli housing authorities opened bidding for the construction contracts, marking the most significant step forward for the controversial initiative since it was first approved in August 2024.

    The E1 project, which targets a 12-square-kilometer stretch of strategically located land between east Jerusalem and the large existing Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim, has long drawn international condemnation for its geopolitical implications. If completed, the full 3,400-home development would permanently split east Jerusalem — which Israel annexed in 1980, a move not recognized by the majority of the international community, and which is majority-Palestinian inhabited — from the rest of the occupied West Bank. This geographic divide would eliminate the possibility of a contiguous, sovereign Palestinian state, a core foundation of the decades-long two-state solution framework for Middle East peace.

    The European leaders’ joint statement emphasized that the timing of the new tenders makes the decision even more alarming, against a backdrop of skyrocketing settler violence against Palestinian civilians in the West Bank and crippling economic restrictions that have severely harmed Palestinian livelihoods. The statement went further than many previous condemnations, issuing a direct warning to private businesses considering bidding on the project, cautioning that participation would put them at risk of complicity in serious violations of international law.

    International pushback expanded quickly beyond the four major powers. Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot labeled the tender announcement “unacceptable,” echoing the global consensus that the project would irreparably damage any path to a viable two-state resolution. The United Nations Secretary-General has previously framed the E1 initiative as an “existential threat” to the creation of a contiguous Palestinian state.

    The United Kingdom has already taken unilateral action to signal its disapproval: On Wednesday, British Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband summoned Israel’s chargé d’affaires to London to deliver a formal demand halting the project and all settlement expansion, and delivered the message directly to Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar in bilateral talks. The UK government also announced it would roll out a full package of punitive measures in the coming weeks, including targeted sanctions against individuals directly involved in illegal settlement expansion.

    Israel has rejected the criticism outright, with Saar pushing back against Miliband’s statement in blunt terms Thursday. He called the British foreign secretary’s language patronizing, and argued that Jewish people hold an inherent right to live across all of what Israelis consider the Land of Israel, drawing a comparison to the right of British citizens to live anywhere across the United Kingdom. Saar further accused the UK of single-sided bias, claiming London only blames Israel while ignoring Palestinian extremism that he claims fuels rising antisemitic attacks targeting Britain’s Jewish community. He called the UK’s decision to confront Israel over the issue deeply damaging to bilateral relations, and pledged that “Israel will defend its rights, its interests and its people.”

    Israeli peace advocacy NGO Peace Now, which first tracked the publication of the new tender, notes that the 1,200 units up for bid make up roughly one-third of the full E1 development. The housing ministry published the tender and opened bidding on August 18, with bid submissions due October 19 — just one week ahead of Israel’s scheduled national election on October 27. Peace Now has accused the current Israeli government of rushing to lock in binding construction commitments before the vote, to cement the project’s future regardless of the election’s outcome.

    The current landscape of the West Bank has grown increasingly volatile in the months following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel from Gaza. Data from international and local monitors confirms that acts of violence by Israeli settlers against Palestinian civilians have surged to unprecedented levels during this period. Today, the West Bank (excluding annexed east Jerusalem) is home to roughly 3 million Palestinians, alongside approximately 500,000 Israeli settlers who have established communities across the territory in developments widely considered illegal under international law. Israel enforces strict movement restrictions on West Bank Palestinians, who require special permits from Israeli authorities to cross checkpoints into east Jerusalem or sovereign Israeli territory.

  • US, Canada ‘very close’ to trade deal, Ottawa says, as details emerge

    US, Canada ‘very close’ to trade deal, Ottawa says, as details emerge

    Fresh off a three-hour negotiating session with a top US trade official in Washington D.C., Canada’s lead representative for bilateral trade Dominic LeBlanc announced Thursday that the two neighboring nations are “very close” to wrapping up a final trade agreement amid efforts to avoid steep new tariffs that former president Donald Trump threatened to impose.

    LeBlanc, Canada’s minister overseeing US-Canada trade relations, met behind closed doors with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer as both sides work frantically to lock in a deal that could de-escalate months of bitter trade friction sparked by Trump’s earlier punishing levies on Canadian goods. Speaking to reporters immediately after exiting Greer’s office, LeBlanc reaffirmed that steady progress is still being made, noting the Canadian negotiating team would remain in Washington to continue working until a final agreement is reached.

    Just one day prior, both sides already signaled they had edged close to a finished pact. This round of progress comes after Trump announced a last-minute 72-hour delay to a planned 50 percent tariff on Canadian imports that was scheduled to go into effect Wednesday, citing signs that a deal was imminent.

    While full details of the draft agreement have not been released to the public, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney held a briefing this week with the leaders of Canada’s provinces and territories to update them on the status of negotiations and outline specific demands Washington has presented that require provincial action.

    Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston told reporters that one core US demand is for Canadian provinces to restock American wine and liquor on retail shelves. Several provinces pulled US alcohol products after Trump imposed tariffs on Canadian automobiles, steel, aluminum and lumber as a retaliatory measure. “The prime minister has asked us, as premiers, as provinces, to return the US alcohol to the shelves,” Houston said, adding that the removal of US alcohol has been a persistent point of tension that has greatly troubled US negotiators.

    Houston also acknowledged the deep public frustration across Canada over Trump’s trade policies, including his past comments about annexing parts of Canada, which have left lasting resentment among many Canadians. Even if provincial governments reverse the alcohol ban, he noted there is no guarantee consumers will choose to purchase American products. “Beyond the provisions in any trade deal, there’s ‘the emotional impact of what Canadians have experienced,’” Houston said, describing the prolonged trade dispute as “emotionally draining.”

    Quebec Premier Christine Frechette, whose province has been disproportionately harmed by Trump’s tariffs, said she will review the full terms of any final deal before deciding whether to comply with the demand to restock US alcohol. In contrast, Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew, a left-wing leader, said he is prepared to restore US alcohol to retail shelves even as he maintains Canada should stand its ground in negotiations. Kinew argued that the US is in a weaker position globally than it was one year ago, predicting Trump will lose heavily in the upcoming US midterm elections and saying “I think we’ve got the upper hand.”

    A second key US demand outlined in the briefing is for provinces to remove explicit language banning US companies from public procurement contracts. While provincial governments will still be allowed to prioritize Canadian suppliers, they can no longer formally exclude US companies from bidding on public projects.

    Canadian media reports indicate the US has also tabled additional demands to the federal government in Ottawa, including new commitments on defense procurement and supplies of critical minerals used in clean energy and technology manufacturing.

    Provincial leaders declined to share details of what US tariff reductions are on the table, but confirmed that some Canadian goods will still face import duties when entering the US even after a deal is finalized. Saskatchewan’s conservative Premier Scott Moe, who received the briefing from Carney, noted that returning to the trade status quo of two years ago is no longer possible, but described the draft deal as “best-in-class.” Houston echoed that assessment, calling the draft agreement “the best possible outcome we can hope for in dealing with this administration.”

  • ‘I heard you missed me’: Melania Trump jokes about month out of spotlight

    ‘I heard you missed me’: Melania Trump jokes about month out of spotlight

    After 31 days out of the public eye that sparked widespread media speculation and untold whispers across Washington political circles, US First Lady Melania Trump stepped back into the national spotlight Thursday, opening a White House Rose Garden event with a lighthearted joke addressing her absence.

    “Good afternoon. I heard you missed me. Here I am,” the 56-year-old First Lady said with a soft chuckle as she approached the podium, marking her first public appearance since she attended the FIFA World Cup final in mid-July.

    The event, held to celebrate a joint scholarship donation from motor racing series IndyCar and media giant Fox Corporation ahead of a capital street race honoring the 250th anniversary of American independence, drew far more attention than its policy-focused purpose would normally command. All cameras and political observers were fixed on Melania, whose unexpected disappearance from the public schedule had become a top topic of D.C. gossip in recent weeks.

    As the First Lady walked from the Oval Office to the event stage, she held hands with her 80-year-old husband, President Donald Trump, who remained in the audience throughout her remarks. Melania’s weeks-long break from public duties followed a pattern analysts have identified in her second term as First Lady: a recent analysis from US broadcaster NBC News found that she has held roughly half the number of public engagements by this point in her second term compared to the same stage of her first term in the White House.

    In the weeks leading up to her return, Melania had skipped several high-profile public events, including the rescheduled July 24 White House Correspondents’ Dinner. She had attended the original April iteration of the dinner, which was disrupted by an armed intruder incident.

    Melania’s comeback also came amid ongoing political buzz surrounding another figure close to the president: 35-year-old Natalie Harp, the president’s hyper-loyal executive assistant who has become a near-constant presence at Trump’s side during his second term. Harp, who has earned the informal nickname the “human printer” for her work drafting social media posts and printing briefing materials for Trump, has been the subject of recent scrutiny after a Democratic U.S. Senate candidate questioned why Harp was one of the few people to quietly swap onto Air Force One with Trump during a security-related disruption during his recent trip to Turkey. The White House issued an angry pushback against the questions earlier this week. Notably, Harp was not in attendance at Thursday’s Rose Garden event.

  • Maradona trial on hold over possible medical evidence mix-up

    Maradona trial on hold over possible medical evidence mix-up

    The ongoing legal trial examining the 2020 death of Argentine football icon Diego Maradona has been halted temporarily, after defense teams uncovered claims that critical kidney test evidence submitted by prosecutors actually belongs to Maradona’s late father, who shared the same name. This latest development marks the second high-profile disruption to the case, which has gripped global football fans since the sporting legend passed away aged 60, two weeks after undergoing emergency brain surgery to remove a blood clot.

    Seven medical professionals are currently standing trial on charges of criminal negligence, accused of failing to provide adequate post-operative care to Maradona during his at-home recovery in a rented property in Tigre, a Buenos Aires suburb. Maradona’s official cause of death was recorded as heart failure and acute pulmonary edema, a dangerous condition that causes fluid to build up in the lungs. All seven defendants have repeatedly denied the allegations against them.

    The first attempt to hold this trial was fully annulled in 2023, after 2.5 months of court hearings, when it was revealed that one of the presiding judges had secretly participated in filming a documentary about the Maradona case, creating an unacceptable conflict of interest. A second retrial launched in April 2024, and was approaching its final stages when the new evidence controversy derailed proceedings.

    Defense legal teams have alleged that the kidney test results entered into the court record do not belong to the 1986 World Cup-winning captain, but to his father Diego Salustiano Maradona, who passed away in 2015. Defense attorney Agustin Varela, representing accused nurse Nancy Forlini, pointed out that some of the test documents are dated to 2015 – a year when Maradona spent most of his time living in Dubai, and was not present in Argentina to undergo the tests. He died later that year after traveling back to Argentina to be with his ailing father.

    Presiding judge Alberto Gaig announced Thursday that the court has adjourned all proceedings until August 27 to allow time for a full investigation into whether the tests match the younger Maradona or another individual. If the defense’s claims are confirmed, the mistake could seriously undermine the credibility of the independent medical commission appointed by the court to assess the circumstances of Maradona’s death. That commission has issued harsh criticism of the level of care the football star received in his final days, and its findings have formed a core part of the prosecution’s case.

    Earlier this week, a nephrology specialist testifying for the prosecution told the court that Maradona, who had a long history of cocaine abuse, lived with chronic kidney disease that should have prompted urgent, close monitoring from his care team. The specialist added that standard medical practice would have required daily blood tests to track Maradona’s kidney function during his recovery, but no evidence exists that any blood samples were collected throughout the two weeks he spent at home after surgery.

    Prosecutors have pushed back against the defense’s claims, arguing that the alleged documentation error does not threaten the strength of their overall case against the medical workers. “They (the defense) will not succeed in bringing down the trial,” lead prosecutor Patricio Ferrari told reporters Thursday. Even so, a confirmed mix-up would significantly strengthen the defense’s position. Forlini’s legal team has said it has no intention of pushing for another full mistrial, however. “I want this case to end so that my client knows her judicial fate,” said Nicolas D’Albora, another of Forlini’s defense attorneys.

  • Jailed Pakistan ex-PM Khan moved to hospital on court order: party

    Jailed Pakistan ex-PM Khan moved to hospital on court order: party

    In a significant court-ordered development that has rippled across Pakistan’s charged political landscape, imprisoned former Prime Minister Imran Khan has been transferred to a leading private hospital in Islamabad for urgent medical assessment and treatment, his political party has confirmed. The transfer, which came in compliance with a Supreme Court directive issued earlier this week, has sparked visible displays of support from Khan’s backers across the capital.

    Pakistan’s top judicial body ordered that the 73-year-old founder of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) be moved to Shifa International Hospital within 48 hours of his legal team submitting a petition highlighting his declining health. By early Friday, PTI spokesperson Zulfi Bukhari confirmed to Agence France-Presse that the transfer had been completed, and that authorities had fully adhered to the Supreme Court’s ruling.

    Heavy security arrangements were put in place around the hospital ahead of Khan’s arrival: hundreds of police officers, many equipped with batons, were deployed to secure the perimeter, and all access roads leading to the facility were cordoned off. Despite the security presence, dozens of Khan’s supporters gathered near the hospital grounds to show solidarity, with some throwing handfuls of red rose petals at passing vehicles in a symbolic gesture of affection for the former leader.

    “It’s confirmed that he has arrived at Shifa International Hospital, the Supreme Court’s order has been complied with,” Bukhari told AFP. Arif Alvi, a former Pakistani president and senior PTI figure, echoed the confirmation in a post on X, writing that the entire nation was “happy and dancing with joy” at the court’s decision.

    The court’s ruling went beyond approving medical care: it also granted Khan new access rights to his family, requiring authorities to allow weekly in-person meetings and twice-weekly telephone calls with his sons. A multi-specialist medical panel will be assembled to oversee Khan’s treatment, and the court ruled that the former PM’s sister Uzma Khan, a practicing physician, will be permitted to participate in the care process.

    This is not the first time health concerns have been raised over Khan’s condition in custody. Earlier this year, Khan received outpatient eye treatment, with his family reporting at the time that he had lost most of his vision in his right eye. His legal team had repeatedly warned that his underlying health issues required urgent, specialized evaluation that could not be adequately provided in a prison setting.

    Khan, who led Pakistan from 2018 until he was removed from office via a parliamentary no-confidence vote in 2022 amid escalating tensions with the country’s powerful military establishment, has been behind bars since 2023. Late last year, he and his wife Bushra Bibi were sentenced to a combined 17 years in prison on charges of corruption and other offenses, allegations Khan has repeatedly dismissed as politically motivated fabrications designed to remove him from the country’s political arena.

    The 73-year-old leader, who previously led Pakistan to victory in the 1992 Cricket World Cup, remains the country’s most popular political figure, according to multiple public opinion polls. His arrest in May 2023 triggered mass nationwide protests that rattled the sitting government, and his base has remained active in organizing displays of support even amid widespread crackdowns on PTI activists.

    For his supporters gathered outside the hospital Friday, the transfer is a small but long-awaited win. “I came here to show my support for the man who has made so many sacrifices for Pakistan,” 69-year-old Younus Qureshi told reporters. Another supporter, 52-year-old Bilal, echoed that sentiment, saying he hoped Khan would receive the quality medical care he needed. “Our love and affiliation will remain with Mr Khan, no matter what,” Bilal added.

  • Broken toilets, leaking roofs: Why India’s ‘cockroach’ party wants to fix schools

    Broken toilets, leaking roofs: Why India’s ‘cockroach’ party wants to fix schools

    On the outskirts of India’s capital New Delhi, a freshly painted single-story girls’ government primary school in Faridabad’s Khedi Kalan village presents a deceptively respectable face from the road. Up close, however, the decay is impossible to miss: the access road is pocked with potholes brimming with contaminated water, crumbling plaster peels from classroom ceilings, half of the school’s eight toilets are clogged with garbage and unusable, and four of its nine classrooms have been shuttered entirely, deemed too structurally dangerous to host children. During monsoon season, local social worker Satpal Narwat explains, the remaining occupied rooms flood regularly, leaving children with no dry space to sit and learn.

    This dilapidated campus is far from an anomaly across India. Decades of chronic underfunding, chronic understaffing, and systemic neglect have left most rural government schools in a state of catastrophic disrepair, laying bare deep inequities in access to quality education for low-income and marginalized communities across the country.

    Currently, India allocates just 4.1% of its total GDP to public education – a figure that only meets UNESCO’s minimum 4% threshold, and lags far behind peer nations. France, Germany, Australia, Brazil, and the United States all invest more than 5% of GDP in education, while Belgium and Sweden commit even higher shares. Both independent education experts and the Indian government’s own National Education Policy (NEP) have long recommended raising national education investment to 6% of GDP, a target that has yet to be met.

    Official data underscores the scale of the crisis: between the 2014-15 and 2024-25 academic years, more than 94,000 government schools across India have closed permanently. A report from government policy think tank Niti Aayog notes that some closures came from administrative mergers intended to streamline the public education system, but acknowledges that falling enrollment has also driven the trend, as families abandon under-resourced government schools for private alternatives when they can afford to do so.

    The crumbling state of India’s public education system has become the target of a new grassroots campaign launched by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), an online satirical activist movement that grabbed global headlines earlier this year for a weeks-long protest in Delhi that ended with the resignation of federal Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. That earlier demonstration was sparked by the May 2025 leak of the NEET medical entrance exam, which forced nearly 2 million students to retake the high-stakes test. More than 20 students died by suicide in the wake of the scandal, with their families blaming systemic government negligence for the chaos.

    CJP’s latest campaign, branded #SchoolThikKaro or #FixTheSchool, aims to draw national attention to the failing infrastructure of rural government schools and pressure authorities to implement urgent reforms. In an interview with the BBC, CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke explained the core mission of the movement: rural government schools have been sidelined for generations, leaving children from low-income village households locked out of the equal educational opportunities available to their peers in big cities. Without access to functional learning facilities, many rural youth are forced into low-wage agricultural, construction, or daily labor work simply because they never had the chance to pursue a quality education. Dipke says the campaign is working to close that gap.

    After visiting more than 20 rural government schools across the country in recent weeks, Dipke told reporters he did not find a single campus that met basic standards for student safety and learning. “There were no benches, no bathrooms, no drinking water, no facilities at all. Even animals would not be kept in such a place,” he said, describing the experience as deeply heartbreaking. Dipke noted that the conditions he observed are identical to what he saw visiting his own childhood village 20 years ago – and that nothing has improved in the intervening decades.

    Dipke and other CJP leaders have shared dozens of user-generated videos with the movement’s 26 million Instagram followers, showing leaking roofs, overflowing dirty toilets, students sitting on dirt floors, and frustrated young people speaking out about the lack of basic resources. The group’s demands are straightforward: functional desks, clean working restrooms, safe drinking water, and upgraded digital smart classrooms that give rural students the same quality of learning as students in elite urban private schools.

    As of yet, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has not issued a public comment on the #FixTheSchool campaign, and the federal education ministry has not responded to requests for comment from the BBC. Still, the CJP’s activism has already emboldened students across the country to speak out, sparking a wave of local protests and viral social media posts that have forced officials to act on longstanding complaints. In Raigad, Maharashtra, a viral video of schoolgirls mocking the unusable, muddy road leading to their campus prompted local authorities to complete repairs within days. In Uttar Pradesh, students marched to the district magistrate’s office to demand a new access road, while another viral clip showed female students challenging a local official to send his own children to a school in such poor condition.

    Senior journalist and political analyst Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay says the CJP’s earlier protest over the NEET leak quickly expanded beyond demands for a minister’s resignation to a broader reckoning with systemic failures in India’s public education system. The #FixTheSchool campaign, he notes, is a natural next step for the movement. The flood of user-submitted videos documenting poor infrastructure, he says, is clear evidence that the campaign is gaining widespread public support. “It can’t be Jantar Mantar 2.0 as it will be much slower and a long-lasting movement,” Mukhopadhyay explains. “But the CJP will get a lot of support for the campaign because there’s plenty to talk about that’s wrong with the schools.”

    Beyond crumbling infrastructure, a chronic shortage of teaching and support staff is one of the most crippling issues facing public schools, according to Chatar Singh, treasurer of the Primary Teachers’ Association in Haryana (the state where Faridabad is located) and head teacher of a primary school in Atmadpur village. Singh’s school is widely considered one of the better-resourced campuses in the region, with a new building funded by a private corporate social responsibility grant and a collection of student academic trophies. Even so, basic services regularly break down: during a BBC visit, a strong stench emanated from the school’s toilets, which had not been cleaned in two days after the part-time government-appointed cleaner called out sick.

    For Singh, however, understaffing is a far larger crisis than dirty restrooms. His campus serves 910 students with a roster of 40 full-time teachers – but during the BBC’s visit, 30 of those teachers had been reassigned to non-teaching government work updating voter rolls, four more were out sick, leaving just six teachers to supervise all 910 students. “Teachers are hired to teach, but across India, government deploys them to do a lot of non-teaching assignments. They are used for election duty and to conduct Census. Most of my teachers have been on voters’ list revision duty since July. It’s affecting the quality of education,” Singh explained. When asked why government schools remain chronically underfunded and neglected, he put the blame squarely on the disconnect between political leaders and public education: the children of bureaucrats, MPs, and senior politicians almost never attend government schools – nearly all send their own kids to elite private institutions that they can afford. Most students at rural government schools are children of low-wage migrant laborers, and the vast majority come from historically marginalized lower castes and communities. Anyone who can scrape together the money to pay private school tuition moves their children out, Singh says.

    That pattern has played out for decades in Khedi Kalan village, where Narwat, the 62-year-old local social worker, attended the now-dilapidated girls’ primary school himself between 1968 and 1973. When he was a student, the building was new, all eight rooms were in use, and it was the only school available for all boys and girls in the village. Flooding became a permanent problem 15 years ago, when local officials raised the level of the adjacent road, leaving the entire school campus below road level and prone to collecting rainwater. Narwat sent his own children to the same government school initially, but eventually transferred them to a private school because of the better facilities. Today, he sends his grandchildren to private school as well – the tuition is a heavy expense, he says, but the local government schools lack libraries, laboratories, and consistent teaching because so many staff are pulled away for non-teaching work.

    Just a few hundred meters from the girls’ school, Narwat showed the BBC the village’s boys’ primary school, where classes are currently held in just two small rooms and an outdoor veranda. A second building that once housed three classrooms was condemned as structurally unsafe and demolished five years ago, with official promises that a new, upgraded building would be built in its place. Today, the empty lot is used as a parking stand for student bicycles.

    Over decades of advocacy, Narwat has petitioned the state chief minister, local members of parliament, district officials, and even the National Human Rights Commission to demand upgrades for both village schools. He says almost nothing has changed in all that time. The #FixTheSchool campaign, however, has given him cautious new hope that the issue will finally get the national attention it deserves. “I think the CJP can be a force for good. They’ve taught people to fight, to not be afraid,” Narwat says. “The government has all the power and resources. And now they have to perform.”

  • Why Nigeria’s one-time political giant may face extinction

    Why Nigeria’s one-time political giant may face extinction

    When Nigeria emerged from decades of military rule in 1999, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) stood as the undisputed architect of the country’s new democratic era. Founded just a year earlier, the party swept its founding presidential candidate Olusegun Obasanjo into office, cementing a grip on national power that seemed unbreakable. For 16 consecutive years, the PDP controlled the presidency and held sway over 35 of Nigeria’s 36 states, with its chairperson famously boasting in 2008 that the party would rule for 60 years. Today, that once unassailable political giant teeters on the edge of collapse, its future hanging in the balance as Nigeria prepares for January’s general election, which officially kicked off this month.

    The PDP’s slow unraveling began with a political earthquake in 2015, when the party lost its hold on the presidency to Muhammadu Buhari and the newly formed All Progressives Congress (APC), a coalition of opposition factions and disaffected former PDP members. The transfer of power from PDP incumbent Goodluck Jonathan to Buhari marked the end of an era, and thrust the PDP into unfamiliar territory as an opposition party. Political analyst Ishaq Buhari notes that the party, long accustomed to the perks and structures of federal power, never adapted to life outside government. “They were a party that was so used to power, being in opposition was a new challenge they struggled with from the start,” he explained.

    If 2015 delivered a crippling blow, 2025 shattered the PDP’s foundational structures entirely. A tidal wave of high-profile defections and bitter internal infighting tore through the party’s ranks, with sitting state governors leading the exit. At the start of 2025, the PDP still held eight state governorships. By year’s end, five governors – from Delta, Akwa Ibom, Enugu, Bayelsa, and Rivers – had defected to the ruling APC, citing the PDP’s fading political relevance and a desire for closer collaboration with the federal government. By late 2025, the PDP lost its last remaining governorship in Oyo State, leaving the once-dominant party with no executive control at the state level. Top party talent has also fled, including former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, the PDP’s 2019 presidential candidate, who left the party in 2025.

    Compounding these losses is a paralyzing leadership dispute that has split the party in two and locked it out of the upcoming election ballot for all major offices. The conflict centers on Nyesom Wike, a founding PDP member who now serves in President Bola Tinubu’s APC-led government. Wike was controversially expelled from the party in November 2025, when a faction claiming to represent the majority of PDP members held a national convention in Ibadan, Oyo State, defying court injunctions to stop the gathering. The expulsion followed widespread accusations that Wike betrayed the PDP by secretly aiding the APC’s victory in Rivers State during the last presidential election. Yet despite the expulsion, Nigerian courts have ruled that Wike’s rival faction is the legally recognized PDP. As a result, only Wike-aligned candidates have been approved to appear on the electoral commission’s ballot for January’s presidential and parliamentary races, leaving the anti-Wike faction with no official representation.

    For a party that defined Nigerian democracy for a generation, the rapid collapse has stunned political observers. Still, a small cohort of die-hard PDP loyalists holds out hope for a comeback. Aminu Adamu, a PDP politician aligned with the anti-Wike faction, argues that the party can rebuild if it resolves its internal disputes, pointing to precedents of collapsed political parties in Thailand and Argentina that returned to power after years in the political wilderness. “All we need to do is put our house in order and start to build from there,” Adamu said. “If we make all the necessary corrections, by 2032 I really think PDP can be a major force again.” Other loyalists point to the party’s still intact grassroots network, which includes local offices, seasoned activists, and a longstanding base of historic supporters, as a foundation for rebuilding.

    Most political analysts, however, argue that the PDP cannot survive on its own. Analyst Deji Olarenwaju says the only path to survival for the party is a formal alliance with either the African Democratic Congress, Nigeria’s current largest opposition party, or Peter Obi’s Nigeria Democratic Congress. With the PDP in open disarray and only Wike-aligned candidates on the ballot, voters are deeply unlikely to trust the party’s brand this election cycle. Without a major strategic shift, the PDP that ushered in Nigeria’s democratic transition will likely fade into political irrelevance, marking one of the most dramatic downfalls in modern African political history.