作者: admin

  • Ukrainians seeking cultural escape from war’s brutality find comfort and resilience at Kyiv art fair

    Ukrainians seeking cultural escape from war’s brutality find comfort and resilience at Kyiv art fair

    Against the persistent backdrop of air-raid sirens and the constant threat of missile strikes, Ukraine’s capital Kyiv has played host to a landmark contemporary art fair that carries a profound, quiet mission: to help a war-battered nation process the unthinkable new normal that full-scale conflict has imposed on daily life. Organized by the long-running cultural platform Art Kyiv, the exhibition, titled *This is Normal*, opened at the city’s Lavra Gallery this cycle, marking only the second time the event has been held since Russia’s full-scale invasion began in 2022, following an inaugural launch last October.

    Anna Avetova, director of Art Kyiv, explains that the decision to hold the fair amid active conflict was not an oversight, but a deliberate ideological choice. “Holding the event during wartime means not waiting for a better moment, but working with reality as it is,” Avetova says. Unlike many cultural initiatives in Ukraine that center overt narratives of war, *This is Normal* makes a purposeful choice: no exhibition booth is dedicated exclusively to conflict. The war permeates every conversation and every unspoken moment in the gallery, Avetova notes, but curators intentionally rejected the urge to force the topic to the forefront. Instead, the fair positions art as a unifying thread that binds everyday life to cultural memory, rather than a separate compartment separated from the national crisis. “In this context, art does not stand apart from life — it helps make sense of the present, preserve cultural continuity, and lay the groundwork for the future,” Avetova adds. “Art is one of the things that keeps us human. It sustains us and warms our soul when things are very hard.”

    Hundreds of works fill the gallery space, spanning an extraordinary range of mediums and styles: from abstract ceramic sculpture and textured mixed-media installations to expressive abstract canvases, surreal portraits, and atmospheric landscape paintings. All works on display are primarily available for purchase, part of a secondary yet critical goal of the fair: to revitalize Ukraine’s stagnant domestic art market. The sector already ground to a near-halt during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the full-scale invasion delivered a far more devastating blow, shuttering galleries, displacing artists, and drying up collector demand. Today, as the market begins to stir back to slow life, the fair stands as proof that Ukrainian creators are ready not only to create for reflection, but to participate in the global and domestic art economy once more.

    The fair has drawn together dozens of Ukraine’s most prominent galleries, leading artists, local collectors, and leading cultural institutions, all gathering in a space where air-raid sirens occasionally cut through artist talks and gallery walks. For many participating creators, the opportunity to exhibit in Kyiv right now carries personal as well as national meaning.

    Ceramic artist Tala Vovk is showing her work at a major Kyiv fair for the first time. She makes a point of attending every cultural event she can in the capital, explaining that these gatherings offer a vital chance to step away from the constant stress of war and detach from the pervasive grief surrounding the conflict. “Art is a place where the everyday doesn’t exist,” Vovk says. She argues that sustaining cultural activity through wartime is not a trivial distraction, but an investment in Ukraine’s long-term future. Nourishing the country’s cultural foundation now, she explains, gives it space to take root and grow stronger once the war ends, and that strength will sustain the nation through every challenge ahead.

    For artist Yuriy Vatkin, whose work is featured at the fair, art has already served as a lifeline through the darkest days of the invasion. When the full-scale war began, Vatkin found himself trapped under Russian occupation in the corridor between Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city, and the Russian border. Even after an attack damaged his studio, painting remained a tool to survive and protect his mental health, according to his representative Denys Dmytriev. True to the fair’s ethos, Vatkin’s displayed works avoid explicit war imagery. Instead, they lean into his signature style: thick, layered brushstrokes, fragmented forms, and vivid, unexpected color palettes that evoke a quiet sense of motion and instability that resonates with the current moment.

    Visitors echo the artists’ belief that continuing cultural life amid war is a radical act of resilience. Anna Domashchenko, a first-time attendee, says she was drawn to Vatkin’s rich, saturated hues, which stir intense, vital emotions that feel missing from daily life under war. She attends as many art events as possible in Kyiv, and says she often hears questions about whether such events are appropriate amid ongoing death and destruction. For her, the answer is clear. “Sometimes you wonder whether it’s appropriate… but these are exactly the things that inspire you and remind you that life is full of color, and all of those colors should be present at any time,” Domashchenko says. “Even in times as hard as these.”

  • Turkish Airlines jet catches fire while landing at Nepal’s main airport; all passengers safe

    Turkish Airlines jet catches fire while landing at Nepal’s main airport; all passengers safe

    On a Monday morning in Kathmandu, Nepal, an unexpected emergency disrupted operations at the country’s busiest air hub: a Turkish Airlines passenger jet erupted in flames while touching down at Tribhuvan International Airport. Though the incident caused significant disruption to regional air travel, no casualties or injuries have been confirmed by local aviation authorities.

    According to airport officials, the Istanbul-originating flight landed with visible fire and thick smoke billowing from the aircraft’s right landing gear. Emergency response teams were activated immediately after the incident, and first responders successfully brought the blaze under control in a timely manner. All 277 passengers on board the Airbus A330 were safely evacuated from the aircraft without harm.

    The single active runway at Tribhuvan — Nepal’s only international gateway — was closed shortly after the emergency to allow for official investigations and clearance work. With the runway out of service, multiple incoming commercial flights bound for Kathmandu were forced to hold over alternative airspace or divert to alternate airports, leaving hundreds of passengers affected by delays across the region.

    This incident adds to Nepal’s long-running history of aviation challenges, rooted in its unique geographic and meteorological conditions. The country’s mountainous landscape creates unpredictable flying conditions, and civil aviation records show Nepal experiences a higher-than-average rate of aircraft accidents and incidents compared to global averages.

    Notably, this is not the first time a Turkish Airlines aircraft has faced an emergency during landing at Kathmandu airport. Back in 2015, another jet from the carrier skidded off a rain-slicked runway amid heavy dense fog, forcing a multi-day shutdown of the airport. Miraculously, that incident also resulted in zero reported injuries. After the aircraft was recovered from the runway, it was towed out of the airport and eventually converted into a public aviation museum.

  • Man accused of Bunnings dog attack in ‘irritating’ court no-show

    Man accused of Bunnings dog attack in ‘irritating’ court no-show

    A new development has unfolded in a widely shared animal cruelty case out of South Australia, where an arrest warrant is now active for a man accused of kicking a tethered dog in a suburban Bunnings Warehouse carpark, after he failed to appear for a scheduled court hearing.

    The incident first made headlines across Australia on March 1, when a security camera clip captured a man striking a four-year-old Staffordshire bull terrier twice outside the Parafield Bunnings location, north of Adelaide. The video spread rapidly across social media, sparking widespread public anger over the treatment of the defenseless animal, which was tied to a ute parked in the lot at the time.

    Authorities identified 48-year-old Nathan Bradwell of Smithfield as the suspect, and he was formally charged with ill-treatment of an animal in violation of South Australia’s Animal Welfare Act. Bradwell made his first court appearance on April 14, where he told reporters he was seeking legal counsel and planned to argue he acted in self-defense, claiming he was trying to move the dog away from his vehicle. He kept his face hidden under a jacket while speaking to the press outside the courtroom following that initial hearing.

    Bradwell was scheduled to make his second appearance in the case at the Elizabeth Magistrates Court on Monday, but he never arrived. After noting Bradwell’s absence, Magistrate David White authorized the issuance of an arrest warrant to compel the suspect to attend a future hearing. Court officials confirmed that if Bradwell is convicted on the current charge, he could face a maximum custodial sentence of two years behind bars. The entire hearing lasted just over one minute.

    Attending the hearing in Bradwell’s place were the dog’s current owners, Hayden Palkovics and Tyler Wright, along with the animal’s previous owner, who is a friend of the couple. In comments to reporters after the hearing, Wright expressed deep frustration and disappointment over Bradwell’s no-show, an action she said has left the pair unsettled.

    “It is frustrating, annoying and irritating. I find it laughable that he did not show up,” Wright said, adding that the absence left the couple “really sad” that the case has been dragged out further. On a more positive note, she confirmed the dog that was attacked has fully recovered and is back to her normal, friendly temperament.

    The case will be called back to court at a future date once Bradwell is taken into custody on the active arrest warrant.

  • Under-threat UK PM Starmer to attempt reset after disastrous polls

    Under-threat UK PM Starmer to attempt reset after disastrous polls

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing the most serious threat to his leadership since taking office less than two years ago, after a catastrophic showing in last week’s local and regional elections that has left his Labour Party reeling and open rebellion brewing among its ranks. On Monday, the 63-year-old prime minister is set to attempt a desperately needed political reset, addressing a public that has grown increasingly frustrated with incremental policy progress, with plans to announce a bolder policy agenda focused on three core areas: boosting sluggish national economic growth, forging closer ties with the European Union, and accelerating progress on energy policy.

    The scale of Labour’s electoral defeat last week has sent shockwaves through the party. For the first time in the 27-year history of Cardiff’s devolved parliament, Labour lost control of the Welsh government, a historic upset that signaled deep voter dissatisfaction with the party’s performance. Across England, Labour shed nearly 1,500 local council seats, while the right-wing, anti-immigration Reform UK party led by Brexit figurehead Nigel Farage exploded from fewer than 100 seats to more than 1,400, a surge that has reshaped the UK’s political landscape. In Scotland, SNP leader John Swinney seized on the results to call for a new independence referendum, framing the move as a safeguard against a potential future Reform UK national government.

    The poor performance comes just 20 months after Starmer led Labour to a landslide general election victory, ending 14 consecutive years of Conservative rule and raising widespread hopes for a new era of governance. Since taking office, however, Starmer’s tenure has been marked by a string of policy missteps and growing public discontent. Most recently, he has been engulfed in controversy over the short-lived appointment of Peter Mandelson as UK ambassador to Washington, who was quickly sacked after new revelations emerged about his past ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Beyond the scandal, Starmer has failed to deliver on promises of faster economic growth, leaving British households still grappling with the ongoing fallout from a years-long cost-of-living crisis that has eroded disposable incomes and pushed up housing and energy costs. He has, however, earned cross-partisan praise for his firm stance against former U.S. President Donald Trump’s policy on Iran, a rare bright spot in an otherwise fraught term so far.

    In the aftermath of the election drubbing, multiple Labour MPs have publicly called for Starmer to step down, breaking ranks to challenge his grip on the party leadership. Former junior minister Catherine West has issued an ultimatum: if no sitting cabinet member launches a challenge by Monday, she will initiate the process to trigger a leadership contest herself, a move that would open the door for other dissident MPs to join the challenge. Former Starmer loyalist Josh Simons became one of the most high-profile defectors from the prime minister’s camp, saying that Starmer has “lost the country” and must resign. Veteran Labour MP Clive Betts added to the pressure, arguing that the party must find a “proper and constructive” path to install a new leader in the coming months.

    Under Labour Party rules, any challenger must secure the public support of 81 sitting Labour MPs – 20 percent of the party’s parliamentary caucus – to trigger a formal leadership contest. For weeks before the election, British media was rife with speculation that top party figures including former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner and Health Secretary Wes Streeting would launch challenges if the results went poorly. Neither has yet announced a bid, and both lack the unified support within the party needed to hit the nomination threshold. Rayner stopped short of calling for Starmer’s resignation on Sunday, but issued a sharp rebuke of his current approach, writing on social media platform X that “this may be our last chance… the current strategy isn’t working and it needs to change.”

    Other popular potential contenders, such as Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham, are ineligible to launch a bid because they do not hold a parliamentary seat. That has sparked speculation that the party’s anti-Starmer camp could rally behind a so-called unity candidate, such as Defence Secretary John Healey or Armed Forces Minister Al Carns. The absence of a clear, consensus challenger means Starmer still has a path to hold onto power, and the prime minister himself has repeatedly rejected calls to step aside. When asked by the *Sunday Mirror* whether he intended to lead Labour into the next general election (expected by 2029 at the latest) and serve a full five-year term, Starmer answered plainly: “Yes, I will.” He reaffirmed his long-stated commitment to delivering a “decade of national renewal” and said he intended to see that project through.

    The potential of a leadership challenge carries major risks for Labour, as it would almost certainly spark a damaging period of internal infighting, with MPs from the party’s left and right wings jockeying to advance their preferred candidates or shore up support for the incumbent. Many in the party are also wary of triggering a leadership change so soon after the chaotic 2022 Conservative leadership crisis, which saw the party go through three prime ministers in just four months, a period of instability that remains fresh in the minds of voters and MPs alike. For now, the country waits to see whether Starmer’s planned reset can defuse the rebellion within his own party and win back disillusioned voters ahead of the next national election.

  • Star Aussie bowling trio to sit out of Pakistan and Bangladesh limited overs tour

    Star Aussie bowling trio to sit out of Pakistan and Bangladesh limited overs tour

    SYDNEY – Cricket Australia has announced a reshuffled limited-overs squad for its back-to-back tours of Pakistan and Bangladesh later this month, making the call to rest three of its star fast bowlers: Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc, and Josh Hazlewood. The high-profile trio will sit out the entire three-match ODI series against Pakistan, which kicks off in Rawalpindi on May 30, opening the door for a wave of emerging young talent to earn their first senior international call-ups. Uncapped all-rounder Liam Scott and Ollie Peake, former captain of Australia’s Under-19 World Cup side, are the two first-time senior selections for the Pakistan tour, while promising young batter Joel Davies has earned a spot in Australia’s T20 squad for the Bangladesh series set for June.

    Several players with ongoing Indian Premier League commitments – Travis Head, Cooper Connolly, Ben Dwarshuis, and Xavier Bartlett – will link up with the national squad after finishing their franchise commitments in the T20 league. Notably, veteran star all-rounder Glenn Maxwell has been left out of the squads for both tours entirely. All-rounder Mitchell Marsh will lead the Australian side across both tours, as the program forms a key early part of the team’s preparation for the 2025 ICC Men’s Cricket World Cup, scheduled to be co-hosted by South Africa, Namibia, and Zimbabwe in October next year.

    In comments announcing the squad, national selection chairman George Bailey emphasized that these back-to-back subcontinental tours represent a critical development opportunity for Australia’s next generation of cricket talent. “It’s always exciting to see new players get an opportunity to play international cricket and be a part of the national team,” Bailey said. “The blend of experienced players coupled with new or returning players will provide a nice mix for these subcontinent tours. Continuing to provide opportunities for players to develop across a broad range of conditions and experiences is important and will continue to be a focus over the next 18 months to two years.”

    The decision to rest Cummins, Starc and Hazlewood is a strategic one: the three frontline bowlers will use the break to build up fitness and prepare for Australia’s upcoming World Test Championship campaign, which resumes in August with a two-match home test series against Bangladesh.

    Following the Pakistan ODI series, which will continue with matches in Lahore on June 2 and 4, Australia will travel to Bangladesh for three ODIs in Dhaka on June 9, 11 and 14, followed by three T20 Internationals in Chattogram on June 17, 19 and 21.

  • Is risk-averse Hollywood running scared of Cannes critics?

    Is risk-averse Hollywood running scared of Cannes critics?

    For more than a decade, the Cannes Film Festival’s iconic red carpet has been a launching pad for Hollywood’s biggest franchises, from *Star Wars* and *Indiana Jones* to *Top Gun*. But as the 2026 edition of the world’s most famous cinema gathering prepares to kick off this Tuesday, a striking absence has sparked widespread industry debate: not a single major Hollywood blockbuster is featured on the official lineup, leaving top studio executives unaccounted for and industry observers questioning what has driven American moviemaking’s most high-profile players to ghost the event.

    For decades, Cannes has built its programming around a delicate balance: boundary-pushing, often challenging independent art house cinema forms the core of its competitive lineup, while big-budget Hollywood blockbusters and their A-list leading stars bring global media attention, mass audience interest, and glamour to the Croisette. Megastars from Tom Cruise to Harrison Ford have turned out to walk the same red carpets as revered auteur directors and little-known indie casts, all in a collective effort to prop up the global film industry that has long navigated financial and structural uncertainty.

    When festival director Thierry Fremaux—who has centered American cinema as a priority since taking the helm 25 years ago—unveiled the 2026 lineup in April, he was forced to directly address the gap left by major studios. He noted that independent American filmmaking, not tied to the big Los Angeles studio system, still has a strong presence at this year’s event: two U.S. independent features will compete for the Palme d’Or, including James Gray’s *Paper Tiger* starring Adam Driver and Scarlett Johansson, and Ira Sachs’ *The Man I Love* featuring Rami Malek. Even so, all of Hollywood’s biggest power players—Universal, Disney, Warner Bros., Sony, Paramount, and even streaming giants Netflix and Amazon—have opted to skip the 2026 festival entirely.

    This blockbuster drought is not unique to Cannes this year. February’s Berlin International Film Festival faced the same gap, with no major American tentpole films on its schedule. Berlin director Tricia Tuttle has framed the absence not as a side effect of political estrangement between the U.S. and Europe under the Trump administration, but rather as a product of shrinking risk tolerance and mounting commercial pressures across the film industry.

    “There’s a nervousness in a very difficult marketplace: nervousness about reviews coming out long before release and about controlling the way films of that scale are launched because there’s so much at stake,” Tuttle explained in a January interview with *The Hollywood Reporter*. She pointed directly to the 2024 Venice Film Festival premiere of *Joker: Folie a Deux* as a turning point: the film received scathing critical reviews ahead of its theatrical release, and ultimately flopped at the global box office. “We’ve seen more reticence since,” Tuttle added.

    In an earlier era of more consistent box office profits and steady studio output, a single commercial flop could be absorbed without major upheaval. Today, however, with studios hyper-focused on cutting unnecessary costs and protecting multi-hundred-million-dollar investments, a bad early critical reception is seen as an unacceptable risk that can sink a film before it even reaches wide release.

    Los Angeles-based film critic and long-time Cannes attendee J. Sperling Reich echoed that analysis, noting that major studios are producing fewer films that fit the festival’s timeline, and increasingly prefer to control their own promotional rollouts rather than cede that control to a festival schedule. “They’re essentially flying in talent, trying to figure out a publicity narrative… two, three, sometimes four months early (before launch), and then they expose that film to the world’s toughest critics,” Reich told AFP. “If it doesn’t fly in Cannes, it’s going to be tough to recover from that.”

    Recent high-profile blockbusters, including the Michael Jackson biopic *Michael* and *The Devil Wears Prada 2*, have already forgone festival premieres in favor of tightly controlled, influencer-driven promotional events tailored to social media. While Reich noted that major anticipated films like Christopher Nolan’s upcoming ancient Greek action epic *Odyssey* and Steven Spielberg’s sci-fi thriller *Disclosure Day* would once have been considered shoo-ins for a Cannes premiere, those projects do not need the exposure the festival provides. “But the reality is those films don’t need Cannes,” he said.

    Not all industry analysts believe the 2026 absence signals a permanent break between Hollywood and the Cannes Film Festival. Observers point out that just six months after the *Joker: Folie a Deux* flop, the 2025 Venice Film Festival still hosted a packed slate of big-budget American films, suggesting the trend is not permanent.

    Eric Marti, head of box office analytics firm Comscore’s French division, noted that Hollywood has always taken a pragmatic, transactional approach to participating in Cannes. “It’s a tremendous showcase, as it’s one of the most watched events, but they also have a very well-oiled promotional machine. If the Cannes dates and their launches line up, the two come together,” he explained.

    Marti added that Hollywood is not entirely absent from this year’s festival: organizers have added a special 25th-anniversary screening of the Universal-owned *Fast and Furious* franchise, with original stars Vin Diesel, Michelle Rodriguez, and Jordana Brewster all set to attend the event. For many in the industry, the 2026 blockbuster gap is just a temporary pause, not a permanent split: Hollywood may be sitting out this year, but it is widely expected to return to the Croisette in 2027.

  • Antony Catalano: Accused media boss excused from court appearance due to ‘potentially detrimental’ impact of media reporting

    Antony Catalano: Accused media boss excused from court appearance due to ‘potentially detrimental’ impact of media reporting

    Prominent Australian media executive Antony Catalano, the former chairman of Australian Community Media (ACM), has been permitted to skip in-person court appearances for his ongoing criminal case, after his legal team argued that intense public and media scrutiny would pose severe risks to his mental well-being. The 59-year-old industry leader faces three serious charges: common assault, threats to kill, and false imprisonment, all stemming from an alleged domestic incident involving his wife Stefanie Catalano at the couple’s St Kilda apartment on March 13.

    Authorities’ accounts of the incident allege Catalano confronted his partner in an acutely drug-impaired state during the early hours of that morning. The victim was reportedly able to escape the residential complex, and was found by a passing motorist while in a state of extreme emotional distress. Catalano was taken into police custody later the same day, with reports indicating he was wearing underwear torn during the confrontation.

    In line with his bail requirements, Catalano had initially been ordered to appear in person at the Melbourne Magistrates Court for the preliminary hearing held on Monday. However, his defense barrister Tony Hargreaves made an urgent application to allow his client to appear via video link from his legal team’s office, arguing that a crowd of waiting journalists gathered in the court building would worsen his client’s already fragile mental health.

    Hargreaves told the court that following his client’s arrest and charging, Catalano admitted himself to a rehabilitation facility to address his health, and only recently completed a 28-day inpatient treatment program. He added that the intense media interest in the case had already penetrated the facility, with photographers obtaining images of Catalano during his stay, and that his client was still in the early stages of recovery post-discharge. “Forcing him to walk through the pack of media waiting downstairs would be potentially detrimental to his mental health,” Hargreaves argued.

    The application went unopposed by Senior Constable Matthew Morris, the prosecuting officer representing police. Magistrate Nahrain Warda granted the request, excusing Catalano from in-person attendance not just for this preliminary hearing, but also for all future scheduled court appearances in the case.

    During Monday’s hearing, Catalano appeared via video link dressed in a dark formal suit, sitting with his arms crossed and was not required to make any statements to the court. Hargreaves told the court that his client has already expressed deep remorse for the events that took place, but the criminal proceedings remain in their early stages, and the defense team is awaiting two key medical reports to move forward with the case. One report is from Catalano’s treating physician, and the second from a consulting psychiatrist. Hargreaves noted that the first provider will not be able to complete their report until late June, while the second will not finish theirs until mid-July, prompting a request for an adjournment.

    Catalano’s bail conditions were extended ahead of the next hearing, scheduled for June 2. In a public statement issued the day after his arrest, Catalano publicly acknowledged his responsibility, saying he was “deeply ashamed and humiliated” by the alleged incident, and announced he would step down from all his professional leadership roles. “I know that my actions have caused hurt and concern for others, including the woman involved, my family, friends, colleagues and the many people connected to the businesses I have been privileged to lead,” he said in the statement, adding that he would not make any further public comments while the matter moves through the court system per his legal team’s advice.

  • The first 48-team World Cup — more opportunities, less jeopardy?

    The first 48-team World Cup — more opportunities, less jeopardy?

    When the 2026 FIFA World Cup kicks off across North America, it will mark the most transformative change to football’s biggest showcase in four decades: the first-ever 48-team tournament. The expansion, a flagship campaign promise delivered by FIFA president Gianni Infantino just a decade after he took the helm of global football’s governing body, has reignited a fierce debate over whether broadening access to the finals will dilute the high-stakes drama that has made the World Cup a global cultural touchstone.

    Infantino has framed the shift as far more than a simple format tweak, arguing the World Cup must evolve beyond an elite athletic competition to become a truly inclusive global social event. For decades, the World Cup fell far short of its ‘global’ branding, dominated by European and South American nations from its early 16-team format through its 1982 expansion to 24 sides. Historical data underscores this imbalance: between the first World Cup and 1982, the entire African continent sent just four teams total to the finals. Even as late as the 1990 tournament in Italy, 14 of the 24 competing nations came from Europe, while Africa, Asia and the CONCACAF region each received only two slots.

    The 1998 expansion to 32 teams moved the needle toward greater fairness in slot allocation, but gaps remained: at the 2022 Qatar World Cup, Europe still claimed 13 spots while Africa earned just five. The new 48-team format addresses this without stripping established powerhouses of their existing access, reallocating slots to create a far more balanced distribution: Europe retains 16 places, Africa earns 10, Asia claims 9, South America and CONCACAF get six each, with an additional spot reserved for Oceania’s New Zealand.

    FIFA’s chief of global football development, legendary manager Arsene Wenger, has defended the expansion as an inevitable and logical step for the sport’s growth. “It’s a natural evolution. We want to make football global all over the world,” Wenger stated last December, noting 48 teams still accounts for less than 25% of FIFA’s 211 member nations, keeping the qualifying bar appropriately high.

    For underdog and smaller nations, the format shift is a historic breakthrough. Tiny Caribbean island nation Curacao, with a total population of just 160,000, is on track to make its World Cup debut in 2026, joined by other first-time qualifiers including Cape Verde, Jordan and Uzbekistan. Curacao head coach Fred Rutten says his side is already relishing the chance to pull off upset wins against global giants. The new format also gives lower-ranked sides a far better shot at advancing past the group stage into the knockout round: the top two teams from each of 12 groups advance, plus the eight best third-place finishers, meaning just one win in the group stage can often secure progression.

    But critics warn the expanded format comes at a major cost to the tension and jeopardy that has produced some of the World Cup’s most iconic moments. Where top-tier nations once faced immediate elimination after an early bad result – think 2022 when eventual champion Argentina faced elimination after an opening defeat to Saudi Arabia, or Germany’s stunning group-stage exits in both 2018 and 2022 – elite sides now have far more room to recover from a slow start. The historic drama of watching a global powerhouse crash out early in the tournament is likely to become a thing of the past, opponents argue.

    The expanded tournament also brings logistical and physical challenges for players. Where the 32-team format featured 48 group-stage games to eliminate 16 teams, the 48-team format requires 72 group-stage matches to cut the field to the same 16 knockout-round participants. To win the tournament, teams will now need to play eight matches, one more than the previous format, all scheduled for a hot North American summer that will put extra physical strain on top players already stretched by crowded club calendar schedules.

    Noted football author Jonathan Wilson, who wrote *The Power and the Glory: A New History of the World Cup*, says the 32-team format was perfectly balanced. “I see the argument about increasing representation but I think a 32-team finals was perfect,” Wilson explained. “The biggest problem with this is not really the quality, it’s the dilution of spectacle in the first round with eight third-placed teams to go through. The group stage may end up trying peoples’ patience.” He added that the extra knockout round could incentivize more defensive, cautious play, further dulling the tournament’s early excitement.

    Even elite managers acknowledge the new strategic priority for big teams has shifted: where once they needed to avoid any early slip-up, now the focus is simply on grinding out enough results to advance. “You just focus on the group, this is what you do, and make sure you are in the right head space,” England manager Thomas Tuchel said of the new approach. As the 2026 tournament approaches, the football world remains split: while smaller nations celebrate unprecedented access, fans and analysts wait to see whether the expanded format will grow the global love of the game – or erode the high-stakes magic that made the World Cup unmissable.

  • Thailand: Who is Thaksin Shinawatra?

    Thailand: Who is Thaksin Shinawatra?

    For nearly 30 years, no single figure has shaped Thai politics more profoundly than Thaksin Shinawatra – a former police officer turned business magnate turned prime minister, whose legacy remains one of the most divisive and influential forces in modern Southeast Asian politics, even decades after he first left office.

    Thaksin’s path to power began in 1949, when he was born in the northern Thai city of Chiang Mai. He launched his professional career as a police officer, earning a government scholarship in 1973 to pursue a master’s degree in criminal justice in the United States. Upon returning to Thailand, he pivoted to the private sector, building a billion-dollar telecommunications empire by the end of the 1980s. In 1998, he launched his own political vehicle, the Thai Rak Thai (Thais Love Thais) Party, a movement that rapidly upended Thailand’s decades-old political order.

    In the 2001 general election, Thaksin stormed to electoral victory in a landslide, defeating the long-dominant traditional establishment of the Democrat Party. His populist platform resonated deeply across class lines: low-income and rural voters flocked to his promises of low-cost universal healthcare and widespread debt relief, paired with his unapologetic criticism of the entrenched Bangkok elite and nationalist policy agenda. Meanwhile, big business embraced his CEO-style governance and pro-growth “Thaksinomics” policies, which pulled Thailand out of the economic stagnation left by the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis and sparked a new national economic boom. Thaksin also earned widespread praise for his swift, coordinated response to the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, which devastated large swathes of southwestern Thailand.

    But his tenure was not without sharp controversy. He faced widespread public and international criticism for the 2003 war on drugs, which left more than 2,500 people dead in extrajudicial killings, as well as a scandal over his government’s decision to cover up an outbreak of avian flu. Thailand’s anti-corruption commission found he had failed to disclose his full personal wealth (though he was ultimately acquitted on that charge), and he faced heavy backlash over his government’s handling of rising separatist violence in the country’s Muslim-majority southern region. Backed by his loyal base of rural supporters, who adopted the color red and became known as the “red shirts” movement, Thaksin weathered every political storm: he made history as Thailand’s first elected prime minister to complete a full four-year term, and won a landslide re-election in 2005.

    Even as he built unparalleled popular support, Thaksin emerged as a deeply polarizing figure, drawing fierce opposition from Thailand’s conservative establishment: the Bangkok elite, the royal military, and pro-monarchy activists, who adopted the color yellow and became known as the “yellow shirts” movement. It was a business deal that ultimately triggered his ouster: in early 2006, Thaksin’s family sold its stake in Shin Corp, the country’s largest telecommunications group, netting $1.9 billion. The deal sparked mass public anger, with critics arguing the family had illegally avoided tax obligations and transferred control of a critical national asset to foreign investors based in Singapore.

    Amid months of massive street protests, Thaksin called a snap general election in April 2006 to force a popular verdict on his leadership. Main opposition parties boycotted the vote, and a large share of ballots were cast as informal “no votes.” Thaksin initially announced he would step down, only to return to office just a month later. By September 2006, with months of political gridlock and unrest paralyzing the country, the Royal Thai Army seized power in a military coup while Thaksin was traveling abroad.

    What followed has been 18 years of political upheaval, with Thaksin pulling the strings of Thai politics from exile and through a dynastic line of proxy leaders. After briefly returning to Thailand following a 2007 election won by his allies, courts empowered by the new military-backed constitution opened a wave of corruption cases against Thaksin and his family. Convicted of corruption, Thaksin fled Thailand once again, beginning 15 years of self-imposed exile centered primarily in Dubai. Even from abroad, he retained control of his political movement: Thai Rak Thai was dissolved in 2007, its successor the People’s Power Party was dissolved in 2008, but the third iteration – Pheu Thai Party – survived. In 2011, Thaksin’s sister Yingluck Shinawatra led Pheu Thai to a landslide victory, becoming Thailand’s first female prime minister, before she too was ousted by a court disqualification and a second military coup. In the 2019 election, Pheu Thai won more seats than any rival party, but was blocked from forming government by conservative parties allied with the military.

    It was not until the 2023 election that the Shinawatra political dynasty saw a shift in fortunes. In a major upset, the progressive Move Forward Party won the most seats in the lower house of parliament, forcing Thailand’s long-standing anti-Thaksin conservatives to strike a grand bargain with Pheu Thai to exclude Move Forward from power. As part of the deal, Thaksin returned to Thailand in 2023 after 15 years in exile, and was greeted by hundreds of cheering supporters upon landing in Bangkok.

    He was immediately taken to the Supreme Court to begin serving an eight-year prison sentence for his decades-old corruption convictions, which Thaksin has always maintained were politically motivated. Within 24 hours, however, he was transferred to a luxury private ward at Police General Hospital after reporting heart complications. Following a formal plea for royal clemency, the King of Thailand commuted his sentence to just one year. Thaksin remained in the hospital for six months before receiving parole and returning to his private Bangkok residence.

    That peace did not last. In September 2025, the Supreme Court ruled that Thaksin’s extended hospital stay had been unlawful, finding the former prime minister “knew or could perceive that he was not in a critical or emergency condition.” He was immediately taken to prison to serve out the remainder of his one-year sentence. In a separate high-profile case that same month, a court acquitted Thaksin of charges of lese-majeste – insulting the monarchy – which carry decades-long prison sentences in Thailand.

    The same month that Thaksin was sent back to prison, his daughter Paetongtarn Shinawatra, who had become prime minister in 2024 after the coalition’s original leader was removed by the constitutional court, was also disqualified and removed from office over a leaked controversial phone call with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen. A breakaway faction from the Pheu Thai-led coalition subsequently installed a new prime minister from outside the Shinawatra circle.

    Despite the string of major political and legal setbacks, both Thaksin and his family have vowed to continue their political fight. In a public statement released to social media shortly after the Supreme Court ordered his return to prison, the 76-year-old former prime minister wrote: “even though I lose my physical freedom, I will still have freedom of thought for the benefit of my country and its people. I will maintain my physical and mental strength to spend the rest of my life serving the monarchy, Thailand and the Thai people.”

    For three decades, Thaksin Shinawatra has dominated Thai politics, surviving coups, convictions, and exiles – and even behind bars, he remains one of the most powerful forces shaping the country’s future.

  • Thailand’s Thaksin released from prison after serving 8 months for abuse of power

    Thailand’s Thaksin released from prison after serving 8 months for abuse of power

    BANGKOK — Decades of polarizing Thai political drama took a new turn on Monday, as former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra walked free from Bangkok’s Klong Prem Central Prison, eight months into a one-year corruption-related sentence. Hundreds of cheering supporters and political allies gathered outside the prison walls to welcome the 76-year-old populist billionaire, who has reshaped Thailand’s political landscape over the past 25 years.

    Thaksin’s family, including his daughter Paetongtarn Shinawatra — the former prime minister and one of Thaksin’s three children — arrived hours early to wait for his release. When Thaksin emerged from the prison gate dressed in a white polo shirt and blue trousers, he was immediately embraced by his relatives. Smiling broadly, he walked through the crowd of supporters, who chanted “we love Thaksin” and presented him with red roses, a long-standing symbol of his political movement. He left the prison compound without addressing waiting reporters.

    Roughly an hour after his release, Thaksin arrived at his private residence in western Bangkok. In live footage streamed by local outlet Thairath News, he rolled down his car window to greet a small group of well-wishers gathered outside his gate. When pressed by reporters shouting questions about his time in custody, he joked, “I was in hibernation, I can’t remember anything now.”

    Thaksin’s political career traces a dramatic arc that fundamentally split Thai society. A successful telecommunications tycoon, he launched his own political party in 1998, won election in 2001, and made history as the first elected prime minister to complete a full four-year term. His signature policies — including a universal national healthcare program and infrastructure investments connecting remote rural regions — earned him fierce loyalty among working-class and poor communities across northern and northeastern Thailand. But his outsized popularity and blunt governing style created deep, enduring rifts with Thailand’s established power blocs: urban elites, royalist factions, and the military. These tensions boiled over in 2006, when a military coup ousted Thaksin while he was traveling abroad. He spent 15 years in self-imposed exile, arguing that the judicial cases filed against him were political persecution carried out by his opponents.

    The 2006 coup set off nearly 20 years of intermittent political upheaval and deadly clashes between pro- and anti-Thaksin factions, even as successive iterations of his political machine repeatedly won general elections. Thaksin only returned to Thailand in 2023, as his latest political party, Pheu Thai, negotiated to form a new ruling government. He was immediately taken into custody to face the long-standing abuse of power convictions that had been handed down in absentia, which included charges of using his office to benefit his personal business empire and improperly approving a state lottery project that caused public financial losses.

    Originally sentenced to eight years in prison, Thaksin saw his term commuted to one year by King Maha Vajiralongkorn. For months, he was allowed to serve his sentence in a private suite at Bangkok’s Police Hospital on medical grounds, sparking widespread public anger over claims of unfair preferential treatment. In September 2025, the Supreme Court ordered him to transfer to the general prison population to serve out the remainder of his term.

    Last month, a Justice Ministry review panel approved Thaksin’s parole application alongside more than 900 other eligible inmates, justifying the decision by citing his good behavior behind bars, his advanced age, and the low risk he would reoffend. Following his release, Thaksin will serve a four-month probation period, during which he is required to live at his registered Bangkok address, wear an electronic monitoring ankle bracelet, and check in regularly with probation authorities.

    Thaksin’s release comes at a turbulent moment for his political bloc. Paetongtarn, his daughter, became Thailand’s youngest prime minister in 2024, but was removed from office by the Constitutional Court in August 2025 after an leaked recording of a controversial phone call with former Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen was made public. In the most recent 2025 general election, Pheu Thai placed third overall, weakening the party’s position in coalition negotiations.