作者: admin

  • Thousands to get brand new burgundy bins in FOGO challenge

    Thousands to get brand new burgundy bins in FOGO challenge

    A major local governing body in Sydney is moving forward with the next stage of a divisive food waste management pilot program, rolling out 1,200 purpose-built dedicated bins for household food scraps across selected residential areas.

    New South Wales’ Northern Beaches Council will begin distributing the distinct burgundy food waste bins to participating homes this month, marking a new chapter in the region’s preparations to meet a state-wide mandate that requires every local council to offer formal food waste collection services by 2030.

    This latest iteration of the trial departs from the first phase, launched in 2025, which combined food waste collections with existing garden waste pickups. During the initial stage, 1,700 households in the Cromer and Dee Why suburbs were given compostable bags to dispose of food scraps alongside their green garden waste bins, with collections occurring once every two weeks. For residents not included in the trial, food waste continues to be collected weekly alongside general rubbish, and all of it ends up in crowded landfills across the state.

    By contrast, the new dedicated burgundy bins in the second phase will be collected on a weekly basis, giving council researchers an opportunity to compare two different collection models. The second phase will focus on 1,200 randomly selected homes across Terrey Hills, Fairlight and Manly Vale, with the entire five-month pilot designed to test how separate food waste collection works across different property types, from large family homes to small granny flats.

    Participating households have already been notified of their inclusion in the program, and council crews will deliver the new bins, countertop kitchen caddies for in-home storage, pre-purchased compostable bin liners and full usage instructions to all participating properties during the first week of the trial.

    Early results from the first phase proved promising: over the testing period, crews collected roughly 330 tonnes of combined food and garden waste, which was processed at regional recycling facilities and turned into nutrient-rich compost for agricultural use across New South Wales. Even with these positive early outcomes, the pilot has remained controversial among some residents, who have raised concerns about additional bin storage requirements, collection scheduling changes and potential odour issues from weekly food waste storage.

    Once the five-month second phase concludes, council leadership will analyze data from both pilot models to identify the most efficient, cost-effective and resident-friendly approach for full rollout ahead of the 2030 state deadline.

  • Collapse of Tokyo’s aging cherry blossom trees during viewing season raises safety concerns

    Collapse of Tokyo’s aging cherry blossom trees during viewing season raises safety concerns

    Every spring, millions of people across Japan flock to public parks and green spaces to take part in hanami, the beloved centuries-old tradition of cherry blossom viewing. But this year, a growing crisis surrounding Tokyo’s most iconic cherry trees is casting a shadow over the annual celebration: the most popular variety, the iconic Somei Yoshino cherry, is reaching the end of its lifespan, triggering urgent safety concerns for visitors.

    Most of Tokyo’s famous Somei Yoshino cherry trees were planted in the 1960s, during Japan’s rapid post-World War II economic and urban expansion. Six decades later, these once-vibrant flowering trees have become old, weak, and increasingly prone to sudden collapse. On Thursday, two separate large Somei Yoshino trees fell in high-traffic Tokyo green spaces: one in the popular Kinuta Park in central Tokyo, and another along the scenic Chidorigafuchi greenway adjacent to the Imperial Palace. The Kinuta Park tree crashed into a perimeter fence, while the Chidorigafuchi tree nearly toppled into the historic palace moat. Miraculously, no one was hurt in either incident.

    The Kinuta Park tree measured 18 meters tall with a 2.5-meter trunk diameter, and was counted among the park’s oldest specimens, estimated to be over 60 years old, according to Tokyo municipal officials. The collapse marks the second major falling tree incident at Kinuta Park since March, when another aging cherry tree fell and injured a passing visitor. Data from the Tokyo metropolitan government underscores the scale of the issue: last year alone, 85 trees fell across Tokyo’s public parks, injuring three people, and a large share of those fallen trees were aging cherry blossoms.

    As the birthplace of the Somei Yoshino variety, Tokyo is home to more of these trees than any other region, and their widespread deterioration has put local officials on high alert during the peak hanami season, when thousands of picnicking visitors crowd under blooming canopies every day. Local officials and arborists point to multiple interconnected causes for the accelerating decline of the region’s cherry trees. Beyond advanced old age, internal fungal growth and gradual soil erosion are weakening tree structures from within. The trees are also facing growing stress from human-caused climate change, with increasingly extreme summer heat waves and extended dry seasons further sapping the strength of already aged specimens.

    Hiroyuki Wada, a certified tree doctor who specializes in aging urban trees in Tokyo, explained that visible warning signs of high-risk trees include severe leaning, trunk cavities, and mushroom growth at the base of the trunk. Risk of collapse rises sharply after heavy rain, he added, when waterlogged trunks become far heavier than dry wood. Wada noted that the cherry tree crisis is part of a broader trend affecting all urban trees planted across Japan in the immediate postwar era. “Many trees that are part of our daily urban landscape were planted shortly after the war, and now 70 to 80 years later, they are growing weaker every year,” he said. “These cherry trees are such a powerful cultural symbol, I hope people see what’s happening to them and connect it to the larger changes happening to our climate.”

    After the March injury incident at Kinuta Park, Tokyo municipal officials launched emergency tree health screenings across all major public cherry blossom viewing parks ahead of this year’s peak bloom. At Kinuta Park alone, inspectors have assessed more than 800 cherry trees, removing high-risk specimens and posting warning signs around trees that were deemed potentially dangerous but not immediately felled. Notably, the tree that fell this week had no posted warning signs, leaving officials acknowledging gaps in current safety protocols. Masakazu Noguchi, a Tokyo metropolitan official who oversees public park management, admitted that current interventions are only temporary, rather than a long-term solution. “At the moment, our measures are mostly temporary, not fundamental steps such as large-scale replanting,” Noguchi said. “We call on visitors to use constant caution, because we cannot guarantee that every park is completely safe even after our inspections.”

    At Inokashira Park, another top hanami destination that draws millions of visitors annually, dozens of aging cherry trees and unstable branches have already been removed in recent years as part of a long-term regeneration and safety plan. The removals have sparked mild public outcry on Japanese social media, with visitors lamenting the empty gaps along the park’s central pond, once lined by a seamless ring of soft pink spring blooms.

    Wada emphasized that a strategic, proactive regeneration plan is the only way to preserve both the cherry blossom landscape and visitor safety for future generations. Despite the growing safety concerns, many hanami visitors are still choosing to enjoy the annual bloom, which only lasts for one to two weeks each year. Lisa Suzuki, a Tokyo resident who visited Kinuta Park this week, said she was aware of the falling tree risk but still wanted to experience the bloom. “I’m a bit worried, but I guess it’s OK if we just stay away from the trunks,” she said. Akira Kamiyashiki, another visitor who came to the park with his daughter ahead of forecasted rain this weekend, said the visible safety signage reassured him. “Seeing the keep-off signs up, I now feel safe coming here to enjoy the blossoms,” he said.

    For Japan, cherry blossoms hold far more than aesthetic value: the annual bloom marks the start of the country’s new school year and fiscal year for businesses, making it a symbolic time of new beginnings woven into the fabric of Japanese national identity.

  • Second US combat plane targeted by Iran crashes near Strait of Hormuz: Report

    Second US combat plane targeted by Iran crashes near Strait of Hormuz: Report

    In a sharp escalation of military tensions between the United States and Iran on Friday, two American military aircraft were downed in Iranian airspace and near the Strait of Hormuz, sending already fraught diplomatic efforts for a de-escalation into further chaos. The first incident, confirmed by multiple anonymous U.S. officials cited by The New York Times, involved the crash of an A-10 Thunderbolt II, commonly known as the Warthog, a single-seat ground-attack jet. Iranian state media reported that its domestic air defense systems engaged and targeted the hostile A-10 near the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, the world’s busiest oil shipping chokepoint. Fortunately, the lone pilot of the downed A-10 was successfully rescued by U.S. forces, per the NYT report. However, NBC News, also quoting an anonymous U.S. official, added that two U.S. military helicopters participating in the rescue operation were struck by Iranian gunfire; all service members onboard emerged unharmed.

    The second downing, which occurred earlier the same day, involved a more advanced U.S. fighter jet over southwestern Iranian territory. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) initially claimed the downed aircraft was a stealth F-35, but U.S. military sources later corrected the record to confirm it was an F-15E Strike Eagle, a twin-seat, all-weather attack jet that carries a price tag of approximately $31 million per unit, far more expensive than the $11.4 million A-10. A spokesperson for Iran’s supreme military command, Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, told the semi-official Tasnim News Agency that the F-15E was completely destroyed in the engagement. Local Iranian state television reported the jet was targeted over central Iran, with wreckage believed to have fallen in the mountainous, rural Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province. The outlet aired footage it claimed showed scattered remnants of the downed jet, and its anchor issued a public call for local residents to turn over any captured enemy pilots to law enforcement, offering a cash bounty for any U.S. service member taken into custody. The IRGC also claimed the downed F-15E belonged to a squadron stationed at Royal Air Force Lakenheath, a U.S. military base in eastern England. As of Friday, U.S. forces had rescued one member of the jet’s two-person crew, while search operations for the second pilot remain ongoing.

    This is not the first reported engagement between Iranian air defenses and U.S. aircraft in recent months. In late March, Iran claimed it had shot down a U.S. F-35, a claim that Washington immediately rejected. At the time, the U.S. military only acknowledged that an F-35 had made an emergency landing following a combat mission over Iranian territory, adding that the pilot was in stable condition.

    Beyond the military clashes, diplomatic efforts to broker a ceasefire between the two nations have hit repeated snags, according to multiple regional and international media reports. On Friday, Iran rejected a U.S.-proposed 48-hour temporary ceasefire, Iranian state-owned Fars News Agency reported, quoting an unnamed official source. The proposal was delivered via an unnamed third-party mediator on Wednesday, and it remains unclear whether Israel, which has joined the U.S. in its ongoing campaign against Iran, would have been a party to the agreement. The announcement comes after a public back-and-forth: earlier in the week, former U.S. President Donald Trump claimed Iran had requested a ceasefire, a charge Tehran immediately denied.

    The Wall Street Journal also reported Friday that earlier mediation efforts led by Pakistan have collapsed entirely. Talks were set to be held in Islamabad, but Tehran refused to send representatives, citing what it calls unacceptable American negotiating demands. Iran’s core terms for any lasting peace agreement include a full U.S. military withdrawal from all bases across the Middle East, and financial compensation from the U.S. for widespread destruction to Iranian civilian infrastructure including schools and hospitals. Multiple other regional powers, including Turkey, Egypt, and Qatar, have been approached to lead new mediation efforts due to their established ties to the Trump administration, but progress has stalled. The WSJ added that Qatar has specifically resisted U.S. and regional pressure to take on the mediator role, declining the offer thus far.

    A recent declassified U.S. intelligence assessment, first reported by CNN Thursday, suggests Iran has prepared for a protracted conflict, and retains significant military capability more than a month into the joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign. The assessment found that roughly half of Iran’s original missile launchers and kamikaze drone fleet remain operational, contradicting repeated public claims from Trump and Israeli government leaders that Iran’s military capabilities have been completely obliterated.

    First entering U.S. military service in 1977, the A-10 Warthog is purpose-built for close air support of ground troops. A total of just over 700 A-10s were built between 1972 and 1984, and the jet has seen action in nearly every major U.S. military campaign of the past 40 years, including the 1991 Gulf War, the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, and the 2003 Iraq War. The F-15E, by contrast, entered production later, with 435 units built between 1985 and 2017; the latest variant of the F-15 family, the F-15EX, costs between $90 million and $100 million per aircraft. In recent weeks, the U.S. has deployed thousands of additional troops to the Persian Gulf region, a move that U.S. officials have acknowledged sets the stage for a potential ground operation to seize key Iranian-held islands bordering the Strait of Hormuz.

  • Iran says it rejects Trump offer of 48-hour ceasefire: Report

    Iran says it rejects Trump offer of 48-hour ceasefire: Report

    Diplomatic efforts to end the more than month-long U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran have hit a major impasse this week, after an Iranian official confirmed Friday that Tehran has formally turned down a U.S.-brokered proposal for a 48-hour bilateral ceasefire. Iranian state-aligned Fars News Agency, quoting an anonymous senior official source, announced the rejection, adding the U.S. had tabled the offer Wednesday through an unspecified third-party intermediary. It remains unclear whether the proposed truce would have also required Israel, a key U.S. partner in the ongoing campaign, to halt military operations.

    The rejection marks the second high-profile breakdown of ceasefire efforts in recent days, following a report from The Wall Street Journal Friday that Pakistani-mediated talks had collapsed. The deadlock came after Iran refused to send delegates to meet U.S. officials in the Pakistani capital Islamabad, citing what Tehran called non-negotiable, unacceptable terms set by Washington. Iran has laid out two non-negotiable conditions for any lasting ceasefire agreement: a full withdrawal of all U.S. military forces from bases across the Middle East, and financial compensation for extensive damage to Iranian civilian infrastructure, including schools, hospitals and other critical public facilities that have been destroyed in the joint campaign.

    Multiple regional states with close ties to the Trump administration—including Turkey, Egypt and Qatar—have been approached to lead new mediation efforts, but Qatari officials have so far resisted public and private pressure from Washington and regional actors to take on the mediating role, the WSJ report added.

    The development comes amid a broader public dispute between U.S. and Iranian officials over ceasefire overtures: Earlier this week, former U.S. President Donald Trump claimed Iran had been the first party to request a truce, a claim Iranian officials have outright denied.

    U.S. intelligence assessments suggest Iran has long prepared for a protracted conflict, retaining significant military capacity even after weeks of intensive bombardment. A U.S. intelligence review first reported by CNN Thursday found that roughly half of Iran’s original missile launcher fleet and kamikaze drone inventory remains intact after more than 30 days of fighting. That assessment directly contradicts repeated public claims from Trump and Israeli government leaders, who have consistently used rhetoric describing an effort to totally “obliterate” Iran’s military capabilities, with the most recent such comments coming as late as this Wednesday.

    On Friday, the conflict escalated dramatically after Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps air defenses shot down a U.S. F-15E Strike Eagle over southwestern Iran. Semi-official Iranian news agency Tasnim carried confirmation of the downing from a spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, the country’s top military command, who said the aircraft had been “completely destroyed.” Iran initially misidentified the jet as an F-35 stealth fighter before U.S. military officials confirmed the platform to be an F-15E.

    The two-person crew ejected before the crash, and CBS News reported Friday that one crew member has already been recovered by U.S. search and rescue forces, while operations to locate the second pilot remain ongoing. Iranian state-affiliated local media reports the jet was targeted over Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province, a remote, mountainous rural region in central-southwestern Iran.

    Shortly after the first downing was confirmed, The New York Times reported Friday that a second U.S. combat aircraft, an A-10 Warthog ground attack plane, had been shot down near the Strait of Hormuz in the Gulf region. The single-seat aircraft’s pilot was successfully rescued by U.S. forces, the outlet added.

  • Democratic states sue to block Trump’s mail-in ballot restrictions

    Democratic states sue to block Trump’s mail-in ballot restrictions

    A legal showdown over election administration has erupted in the United States, as the top leaders of 23 states governed by the Democratic Party have filed a federal lawsuit aiming to halt newly imposed restrictions on mail-in voting unveiled by President Donald Trump via executive order earlier this week.

    The core of the plaintiffs’ legal argument centers on constitutional authority: the lawsuit contends that the president lacks any constitutional mandate to interfere in the administration of U.S. elections, a power explicitly reserved for individual state governments. According to the court filing, the new executive rules “transgress Plaintiff States’ constitutional power to prescribe the time, place, and manner of federal elections” and amount to an unlawful attempt to “amend and dictate election law by fiat based on the President’s whims.”

    The U.S. Constitution clearly outlines the division of election oversight authority: individual state legislatures hold the power to set the rules for federal elections, while Congress retains the right to modify those regulations at the national level. This framework puts Trump’s unilateral action directly at odds with long-standing constitutional separation of powers, the suit argues.

    Trump has spent months pushing unsubstantiated claims that widespread voter fraud is inherent to mail-in voting, a narrative he has repeated even as members of his own household have taken advantage of the voting method. The president himself recently cast a mail-in ballot in Florida, citing his status as sitting president, and both his wife Melania and son Donald Trump Jr. have used mail-in voting in recent electoral cycles.

    The executive order, signed by Trump this past Tuesday, includes two key provisions. First, it orders the federal government to build and maintain a national database of all U.S. citizens eligible to vote. Second, it directs the U.S. Postal Service to only deliver mail-in and absentee ballots to voters who appear on a state-maintained Mail-in and Absentee Participation List, a requirement designed to restrict ballot access to only those formally registered to vote by mail.

    New York Attorney General Letitia James, a leading figure in the coalition of plaintiffs, emphasized the stakes of the legal challenge in a public statement following the filing. “Free and fair elections are the cornerstone of our democracy, and no president has the power to rewrite the rules on his own,” James said.

    Independent legal experts have echoed the plaintiffs’ skepticism, noting that there is little precedent or constitutional support for the president unilaterally overhauling state-run election procedures. Most analysts agree that the new restrictions are extremely unlikely to go into effect ahead of November’s midterm elections, which will determine which party controls the majority in both chambers of the U.S. Congress.

    This is not the first time the courts have pushed back against Trump’s election-related executive actions. Judges have already blocked a separate executive order that would have withheld federal election funding from states that refused to comply with Trump’s preferred voting rules.

    The latest executive order comes as Trump continues to pressure congressional Republicans to pass the SAVE America Act, a sweeping voting reform proposal that would require all prospective voters to provide proof of U.S. citizenship in order to cast a ballot, a measure that voting rights advocates argue would disenfranchise millions of eligible voters.

  • US pilot rescued after ejecting over Iran: Israeli media

    US pilot rescued after ejecting over Iran: Israeli media

    In the latest development unfolding amid already soaring Middle Eastern tensions, multiple Israeli media outlets have confirmed that a U.S. fighter pilot ejected over Iranian airspace after his aircraft was downed, and has since been safely recovered. The revelation was first shared by Israel’s Channel 12 News on Friday, with other Israeli journalistic sources corroborating the report, though key questions remain unanswered about the second crew member on the stricken jet.

    According to the outlets, the status of the navigator who was also aboard the downed aircraft is still unknown, as search operations continue across central Iran to locate the missing crew member. Citing information from a senior unnamed Israeli official, Channel 12 added that the Israel Defense Forces has called off planned strikes in the Iranian region where the search for the navigator is currently underway, to avoid disrupting ongoing recovery efforts.

    Israel’s state-owned public broadcaster Kan TV News further reported that Israeli intelligence bodies are actively supporting U.S. operations to track down the downed jet’s two-person crew, sharing critical reconnaissance and location data to assist in the search.

    The incident traces back to earlier the same day, when Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) announced that its aerospace division had successfully intercepted the aircraft using advanced domestic air defense systems, shooting it down over central Iranian territory. Photos circulated by Iranian state media purport to show wreckage fragments from the downed U.S. jet, captured in the area after the incident.

    This downing comes against a backdrop of drastically escalated cross-border hostilities that have roiled the region since late February. On February 28, joint U.S.-Israeli military strikes targeting sites inside Iran kicked off the latest cycle of open conflict, prompting Iran to launch retaliatory missile and drone assaults against both Israeli territory and U.S. military installations positioned in neighboring Gulf states. The ongoing clashes have raised widespread international alarm over the risk of a full-scale regional war that could draw in global powers.

  • How Canada’s largest gun control effort in decades is missing the mark

    How Canada’s largest gun control effort in decades is missing the mark

    For more than 35 years, gun control advocate Heidi Rathjen has pushed for sweeping restrictions on assault-style weapons, a fight born from unspeakable tragedy. In 1989, a gunman opened fire on her campus at Montreal’s École Polytechnique, killing 14 women and wounding more than a dozen others. The massacre marked a defining shift in Canada’s approach to gun violence, but it would take another 31 years—and a second mass killing that left 22 dead in Nova Scotia in 2020—for the federal government to finally act, rolling out a national ban on roughly 2,500 models of assault-style firearms paired with a voluntary buyback program to remove existing weapons from civilian circulation.

    Three years on, what was meant to be a landmark public safety win has devolved into a fragmented, widely criticized effort facing pushback at every turn, from provincial governments and law enforcement to legal gun owners and even the country’s own public safety minister. Experts and advocates warn the program is at high risk of falling far short of its goals, plagued by poor communication, inconsistent policy design, and political division.

    Rathjen, who now serves as a spokesperson for gun control group PolySeSouviene, acknowledges the 2020 ban represents a step forward for public safety, but argues it is fatally flawed by its narrow scope. Key models of semi-automatic weapons, including the widely owned SKS rifle, remain excluded from the ban, leaving thousands of high-powered firearms still in circulation. “Without a comprehensive ban on assault weapons, there is no ban… and the money will be wasted,” she said, warning that the federal government’s $215 million CAD investment in the program risks delivering little meaningful improvement to community safety if the scope of the ban is not expanded.

    Even Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree publicly expressed confusion over the policy’s logic, in a private conversation leaked to the *Toronto Star* late last year. Pressed on the program’s value, given that the vast majority of gun crime in Canada is committed with unregistered, illegal firearms, he told a Toronto resident, “Don’t ask me to explain the logic to you on this.” Anandasangaree later walked back the comments, calling them “misguided” and reaffirming his support for the initiative, but the leak amplified public doubts about the policy’s coherence.

    The challenges facing Canada stand in stark contrast to the widely celebrated success of similar programs implemented after mass shootings in Australia and New Zealand. After the 1996 Port Arthur massacre that left 35 dead, Australia implemented a national ban and buyback that removed more than 650,000 firearms from circulation, while New Zealand collected roughly 56,000 weapons after the 2019 Christchurch mosque shooting that killed 51 people. Joel Negin, a public health professor at the University of Sydney, said Australia’s success stemmed from two key choices that Canada failed to replicate: a rapid, coordinated rollout of a broad suite of gun control measures immediately after the tragedy, and sustainable, dedicated funding from a temporary national tax levy. In Canada, by contrast, the buyback has been rolled out slowly, disconnected from complementary interventions targeting illegal gun trafficking, and lacks the coordinated intergovernmental alignment that made Australia’s program work. “The situation in Canada is that the gun buy-back has been proposed, but it’s not necessarily linked closely to other interventions,” Negin explained, noting the rollout of all post-2020 gun laws has been deeply fragmented.

    Confusion over which firearms fall under the ban is pervasive among legal gun owners, according to Frank Nardi, a gun shop owner based in Montreal. Nardi, who opposes the ban, argues it unfairly targets law-abiding hunters and sport shooters while failing to address the root causes of gun violence in Canada, most notably gaps in the mental health system and rampant cross-border smuggling of illegal guns from the United States. He told the BBC many of his regular clients have approached him with questions about the program, unable to determine whether their own firearms are prohibited under the current rules. Pointing to two nearly identical semi-automatic rifles with the same caliber and ammunition type, he noted one is classified as prohibited while the other remains legal, a seemingly arbitrary distinction that has eroded trust in the policy among gun owners. “Let’s concentrate on that before slapping all these regulations and confiscations on all these legal firearm owners, who have always supported safety and followed the protocols,” he said.

    Political division has further gridlocked the rollout: two conservative-leaning western provinces, Alberta and Saskatchewan, have refused to participate in the federal program. Alberta will not enforce the ban, while Saskatchewan has passed legislation shielding gun owners from criminal liability until the province secures a guarantee of what it calls fair compensation for surrendered weapons. Blaine Beaven, Saskatchewan’s newly appointed firearms commissioner, framed the province’s opposition as a defense of legal gun owners, calling the ban “an ideological mandate that’s being put out there that has limited to no discernible benefit to public safety.” Multiple Canadian police forces have also declined to assist with the program, describing it as a “significant operational burden” that diverts resources away from their top priority: cracking down on illegal gun smuggling.

    This widespread pushback comes even as polling shows most Canadians support stronger gun control: a 2020 survey found 82% of respondents backed a ban on military-style assault weapons, and a majority say the country’s current gun laws are either appropriate or not strict enough. Canada already has far more stringent regulations than its neighbor the United States, requiring all gun buyers to pass a safety course and complete rigorous background checks to obtain a firearms license. But lax gun laws in the U.S. have fueled a steady flow of illegal weapons across the border: 2024 data from Ontario, Canada’s most populous province, shows roughly 91% of handguns seized in criminal investigations originate from the United States.

    While most gun crime in Canada involves unregistered illegal handguns, high-profile mass shootings that have shaken the country over the past three decades have almost exclusively involved long guns, from the 1989 École Polytechnique attack to the 2020 Nova Scotia rampage. Most recently, in February 2024, an 18-year-old gunman killed eight people, including multiple schoolchildren, in the small British Columbia town of Tumbler Ridge, using at least one unregistered modified rifle before dying of a self-inflicted wound.

    Despite the widespread criticism, the federal government says it remains committed to moving forward with the buyback. As of the initial declaration deadline this spring, more than 37,000 gun owners have voluntarily declared more than 67,000 prohibited firearms for buyback, just half of the 136,000 total weapons the government set aside funding to purchase. An amnesty period for gun owners to surrender their weapons without facing criminal charges has already been extended multiple times, and the new deadline for destruction is set for 30 October. It remains unclear whether that deadline will hold, however.

    The Supreme Court of Canada recently agreed to hear a legal challenge to the 2020 ban brought by the Canadian Coalition of Firearm Rights, after two lower courts upheld the policy. The court’s decision is not expected for several months, and the gun rights group is already advising owners who have declared their weapons to withdraw their applications pending the ruling. Group founder Tracey Wilson told the BBC the coalition is prepared to file its own request to extend the amnesty deadline if the federal government does not act first. “We’re not going to wait for them to do the right thing by Canadians,” she said.

    For Rathjen, who has spent more than half her life fighting for stronger gun laws, the current impasse is a devastating disappointment. With time running out to expand the ban to include all assault-style models, she warns the federal government has invested hundreds of millions of dollars and massive political capital into a program that is already heading for failure. “It’s just unbelievable that the government has invested so much in this controversial and difficult file, so much money, so much political capital, and yet they’re heading for failure,” she said.

  • ‘We want a voice in our land’ – the people evicted to build Nigeria’s capital

    ‘We want a voice in our land’ – the people evicted to build Nigeria’s capital

    Fifty years after Nigeria established its Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to house the new capital city of Abuja, indigenous communities that gave up their ancestral lands still battle for the compensation, basic services, and political representation promised to them decades ago. For Lami Ezekiel, an 80-something elder who still carries vivid memories of the late 1980s, the arrival of heavy construction machinery marked the end of life as she knew it. “We just watched big trucks and bulldozers flatten our farms,” she recounts. Ezekiel and thousands of other original inhabitants of the land that became Abuja have waited generations for the compensation pledged when their communities were cleared for government buildings, foreign embassies, and luxury developments.

    The push for a new Nigerian capital began in the 1960s, driven by growing concerns that the former capital, Lagos, was too vulnerable to attack due to its coastal location and politically divisive as a major hub of the Yoruba ethnic group in a country balancing deep ethnic rivalries. In February 1976, the military government under Murtala Muhammed carved out the 7,315-square-kilometer FCT from parts of three existing states: Niger, Plateau, and Kaduna. The government officially branded the territory “neutral, no man’s land” — a phrase that still stings for the at least 10 indigenous groups, including the Gbagyi people, who have called this land home for millennia.

    Daniel Aliyu Kwali, president of the FCT Stakeholders’ Assembly, points out that archaeological and historical records confirm indigenous communities have inhabited the region for more than 6,000 years. “The FCT is only 50 years old; I am 70 years old. We are far older than the capital territory itself,” Kwali notes.

    Isaac David, born in 1982 in the FCT’s Kabusa community, grew up playing in clean streams and helping his family tend crops on land that had sustained his ancestors for generations. Today, the streams that once watered his community are gone, replaced by the five-star Transcorp Hilton Abuja. Former farmland now hosts the United Nations headquarters, the U.S. Embassy, and Nigeria’s seat of power, the Aso Rock Presidential Villa — built on what was once a sacred community shrine. Today David owns farms in neighboring Niger state, because indigenous residents who want to farm now must purchase land far outside Abuja’s city limits.

    Initially, the Nigerian government planned to relocate all “few local inhabitants” outside the FCT boundaries, but scrapped the plan over the high cost of mass resettlement. “Due to the high cost of resettlement, the government allowed residents who wished to stay in the FCT to remain,” explained Nasiru Suleiman, director of resettlement and compensation at the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA). Under the adjusted policy, residents of what would become central Abuja were relocated to planned resettlement communities like Kubwa, about 30 minutes from their original homes.

    For many families, the forced removal was a traumatic experience. John Ngbako, who served as Maitama community secretary at the time, recalls asking authorities why original inhabitants could not stay alongside the new arrivals moving into the capital. Community leaders say they were promised new farmland, housing, and fully installed water and electricity infrastructure at the Kubwa relocation site. But before negotiations over the terms of resettlement could be finalized, security forces moved in. Families were loaded onto open tipper trucks and dropped off in Kubwa, where none of the promised amenities existed, and tensions quickly flared with Kubwa’s original inhabitants.

    Laraba Adamu, who was newly married when she was relocated, remembers open hostility when she went to the local river to fetch water. “People would see us coming and shout, ‘The government cows have arrived,’” she says. Today, Ezekiel lives in a small two-room home in Kubwa where she has to cook outdoors. “When we were moved, they promised us all the social amenities,” she says. “None of them have been fulfilled. We pay for our drinking water, we pay for our electricity, and we have no farmland at all.” The displaced Maitama community named their new settlement Maitama-Kubwa, clinging to the identity of the neighborhood they were forced to leave. Esu Bulus Yerima Pada, who became chief of Maitama-Kubwa in 2001 as a descendant of the community’s traditional ruling line, says the government also promised to issue formal land titles confirming residents’ ownership of their new plots. “To this day, they have never done it,” he says. Community leaders still bring younger generations to visit the upscale Maitama district of central Abuja to show them the land their ancestors tended, where even the banana trees planted by previous generations still stand.

    Tensions over land and forced demolitions have not faded — they continue to erupt today. In March 2025, bulldozers moved into Gishiri, another indigenous community that predates the FCT, to demolish dozens of homes. Princess Juliet Jombo, a 32-year-old schoolteacher, lost all the properties her late father, a traditional ruler, had built and left for her family. “Everything my father worked for his whole life and left to us — it was all destroyed,” she says. Her one-bedroom flat was originally valued at just 260,000 naira ($170), and even after public protests the valuation only doubled to 520,000 naira — far too little to buy alternative housing in Abuja’s rising market. The demolition also destroyed the community primary school, leaving nearly 500 students out of classes for months.

    Suleiman of the FCDA insists the resettlement process is conducted through consultation with affected communities, and that compensation is either paid directly to recipient bank accounts or provided as newly built housing. But community activists and leaders say support and resettlement always come after forced demolitions, never before. “By law, the government must first hold dialogue with the people, who have the right to choose a place where they feel safe,” David says. “Then the government should build new housing, and only then relocate people to the new site.” David, who has become one of the most visible advocates for FCT indigenous rights earning him the nickname “Commander,” entered political activism in the mid-2000s after learning about the FCT’s unique constitutional status.

    For indigenous communities, the fight goes far beyond unfulfilled compensation promises — it is also a battle against systemic political exclusion. Unlike any of Nigeria’s 36 states, the FCT has no elected governor. Instead, the country’s president appoints a minister from anywhere in Nigeria to exercise powers equivalent to a state governor. “As an indigene of Niger state, I could run for governor of Niger state,” Kwali says. “But here in the FCT, my home, I have no constitutional right to elect a governor, and I cannot run for the position myself. Any other Nigerian can become FCT minister, but I never can.”

    The exclusion extends to local office: unlike other regions of Nigeria that reserve local elected positions for people with indigenous family origins in the area, any Abuja resident can run for local office regardless of their birthplace. Many FCT elected representatives come from other parts of Nigeria, a situation that strikes indigenous residents as deeply unfair. “I could never go to your home village and run for local office and expect to win,” said Methuselah Jeji, a 32-year-old new father who worries about the barriers his child will face growing up in the FCT. “My child can never be governor. That is very sad — it is not that I am unable, it is just that this is the land where God placed me.”

    David argues that the lack of indigenous political representation directly explains why most FCT indigenous communities remain mired in underdevelopment, even as central Abuja sees massive state investment. While central Abuja boasts wide, paved boulevards, gleaming foreign embassies, and luxury high-rise apartments, most indigenous settlements on the capital’s outskirts have potholed dirt roads, overcrowded classrooms, understaffed clinics, unreliable electricity, and no formal secure land ownership for residents. “When we had one of our own in the Senate, we saw real change,” David says, referring to Philip Aduda, the only FCT indigenous person ever elected to the Nigerian Senate, who lost his seat in 2023 to a candidate originally from Kano state.

    Danladi Jeji, Methuselah’s father, warns that the decades of unresolved grievances and stalled court cases have created a tinderbox. With many legal challenges languishing in the court system for years, many indigenous residents feel their concerns are completely ignored by the government. He fears that the younger, more politically aware generation of indigenous FCT residents will grow tired of peaceful advocacy and turn to confrontation: “This is a bomb waiting to explode.”

    Despite decades of disappointment, activists still prioritize non-violent action to advance their demands. “We can demand our rights peacefully,” David says. “We want representation. We want to have a voice in our own land.” For her part, Ezekiel still holds out hope that the government will finally keep its promises, and that she will get farmland to work before she dies. “If I could be given land to farm today, land where I and my children can work, I would be truly grateful,” she says. “I am still strong.”

  • How Bombay went from a fort city to a bustling metropolis

    How Bombay went from a fort city to a bustling metropolis

    One of India’s most dynamic and culturally layered cities, Mumbai—officially known as Bombay for most of its modern history—has grown from a cluster of seven isolated islands into a bustling megacity of 20 million people. Shaped over hundreds of years by shifting political tides, economic booms, and diverse social movements, its landscape and identity have been molded by generations of inhabitants: from the indigenous Koli fisherfolk who first settled its shores, to colonial urban planners, Bollywood icons, and wealthy textile magnates who each left their indelible mark. Today, the city continues its constant evolution, as old landmarks make way for new development, long-held traditions blend with cutting-edge modernity, and the metropolis reinvents itself decade after decade.

    To capture this centuries-long story of transformation, New Delhi-based art institution DAG has launched a groundbreaking new exhibition titled *Bombay Framed*, which traces the city’s changing shape and character through a stunning curated collection of paintings, vintage photographs, and multimedia artworks. Spanning 300 years of urban history, the exhibition features more than 100 visual works that document the full diversity of Bombay life, from the privileged worlds of Zoroastrian merchant elites and early Bollywood stars to the quiet, everyday struggles of working-class ordinary citizens.

    Curated by noted historian Gyan Prakash, the exhibition frames the city itself as a living work of art. “Together they invite us to see the city itself as a kind of artwork: layered, complex and made up of many different experiences,” Prakash explained in an interview with the BBC. Prakash highlights four pivotal turning points that fundamentally reshaped Bombay’s urban landscape. The first came in the 1830s and 1840s, when large-scale land reclamation projects and earthen bunds connected the seven scattered original islets into a single contiguous island city. Two decades later, in the 1860s, the old colonial fort walls were demolished, clearing space for grand imperial government and commercial buildings that gave the city its distinct colonial architectural identity. In the 1920s and 1930s, the iconic Marine Drive corniche—dubbed the “Queen’s Necklace” for its glowing curved skyline at night—was developed alongside a sweeping collection of Art Deco buildings, forging a uniquely modern architectural style that broke from the earlier Victorian Gothic aesthetic that had defined the city. Since the 2000s, urban planners have prioritized large-scale utilitarian infrastructure projects, including new sea bridges and expanded coastal highways that have radically altered the city’s 21st-century skyline.

    Throughout its history, Bombay has been defined by stark, striking contradictions that shape its unique character: gleaming luxury skyscrapers rise meters next to crowded informal shantytowns, the restless chaotic energy of the city center contrasts sharply with the quiet calm of the surrounding Arabian Sea, and centuries-old heritage structures stand alongside cutting-edge modern commercial developments. It is home to 2,000-year-old ancient rock-cut Buddhist caves, as well as sprawling modern textile mills and India’s premier atomic research facilities—creating such a diverse tapestry that no two people experience the city in the same way.

    Unlike many historical exhibitions that focus only on architecture and elite power, *Bombay Framed* centers the role of ordinary people in shaping the city’s soul. “Even the early British picturesque views of the sea and boats include human figures, reminding us that the environment was always shaped by human activity,” Prakash notes. From Parsi philanthropists and Maharashtrian nobility to textile mill workers and marginalized migrant settlers, the collection showcases the full spectrum of communities that have contributed to building Bombay over centuries. For example, commissioned portraits of early 20th-century Parsi elite reveal the patronage networks and social aspirations of the mercantile community that formed the economic backbone of the colonial city. In sharp contrast, works by socially conscious artist Chittaprosad—known for his sharp political commentary—offer intimate unflinching depictions of working-class and informal life on the city’s margins.

    The exhibition also honors Bombay’s outsized role as the birthplace of Indian cinema, blending art from the silver screen with the city’s street life. Vintage film posters from the 1950s and 1960s, once plastered across the walls of the city’s neighborhoods, are displayed alongside a collection of iconic portraits by JH Thakkar, founder of Mumbai’s legendary Dadar-based India Photo Studio. “His moody, meticulously composed silver gelatin portraits shaped how audiences saw stars like Raj Kapoor, Nargis, Dev Anand, Meena Kumari and Dilip Kumar,” the exhibition’s curatorial note reads.

    The exhibition’s title, which uses the colonial-era name “Bombay” rather than the official modern name “Mumbai,” has sparked gentle discussion around the city’s contested naming history. The Indian government officially changed the city’s name from Bombay to Mumbai in the mid-1990s, a move framed as a step to shed the country’s colonial legacy, and the name Bombay has become politically charged for many groups. Prakash explains that the choice of title was rooted in historical context, not political positioning: most of the works included in the exhibition date from the era when the city was officially known as Bombay. “For Marathi speakers, it was always Mumbai. I’m agnostic about the name, as are many people, which reflects the city’s long history of dual names and multiple perspectives. It really only becomes contentious when the issue is politicised,” Prakash says.

  • China aims to show global leadership with Iran war diplomacy. US appears uninterested

    China aims to show global leadership with Iran war diplomacy. US appears uninterested

    As the Iran war enters its fifth week marked by sharp military escalation, China has emerged as an increasingly active diplomatic player in the Middle East, launching a coordinated push to position itself as a responsible mediator while facing widespread skepticism from the United States over the substance of its peace efforts.

    Beijing’s latest diplomatic gambit centers on a joint five-point peace proposal drafted alongside Pakistan, which it has spent weeks rallying regional and global powers to support. The framework calls for an immediate end to hostilities and the reopening of the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, where Iran’s control over shipping traffic has sent global energy prices skyrocketing. China has also openly opposed a revised United Nations resolution put forward by Bahrain that would authorize defensive military action to secure the waterway, arguing that any Security Council action must de-escalate tensions rather than inflame them further.

    Since the outbreak of the war, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi has conducted a flurry of diplomatic outreach: holding more than 20 phone calls with foreign ministers across the Middle East and major global powers, hosting his Pakistani counterpart in Beijing to finalize the joint proposal, and dispatching a special envoy to the region to hold face-to-face talks on de-escalation. Wang has courted support from Gulf nations and European Union officials, framing the five-point plan as a reflection of broad international consensus that prioritizes peace. China and Russia have lobbied against the Bahrain UN proposal, warning that outside powers could exploit a UN mandate to expand the conflict; to avoid a likely veto, Bahrain has significantly watered down the text and delayed a vote until next week.

    Analysts and U.S. officials frame China’s heightened diplomacy as a calculated bid to expand its global influence at the United States’ expense. Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Washington-based Stimson Center, noted that the ongoing crisis presents a rare, high-profile opportunity for Beijing to demonstrate its diplomatic leadership on a pressing global issue. “The war with Iran is the priority of all countries in and outside the region,” Sun explained. “It is an opportunity China will not miss to demonstrate its leadership and diplomatic initiative.”

    Former senior U.S. diplomat Danny Russel, now a distinguished fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute, drew a direct parallel between the current five-point proposal and China’s 2023 12-point peace plan for Ukraine, arguing that both efforts amount to empty rhetoric rather than actionable mediation. “What we are seeing from China is messaging, not mediation,” Russel said. “Its narrative is that while Washington is reckless, aggressive and heedless of the cost to others, China is a principled and responsible champion of peace.” Liu Pengyu, spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, has pushed back against this characterization, asserting that China has worked “tirelessly for peace” since the war began.

    The Trump administration has made clear it has little enthusiasm for China’s mediation efforts. Three U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the Associated Press that Washington has grown skeptical of third-party mediation in the conflict, and has no interest in boosting China’s international standing or granting it a victory in the Middle East. The administration currently describes its position on the Chinese-Pakistani proposal as “agnostic” — neither endorsing nor rejecting it — but officials note this posture could shift ahead of President Donald Trump’s planned summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping, currently scheduled for mid-May. Trump initially postponed the meeting from its original late March date citing the demands of the war, and analysts say Beijing has a clear incentive to de-escalate tensions before the summit to avoid another delay.

    In terms of core national interests, China is better insulated from the economic fallout of the Strait of Hormuz closure than many other major economies, thanks to years of energy supply diversification, reduced fossil fuel dependence, and a large strategic petroleum reserve. Only around 13% of China’s oil imports come from Iran, and Beijing has secured agreements with Tehran to allow Chinese-flagged vessels safe passage through the waterway. Still, analysts warn that a protracted conflict would eventually harm China’s export-driven economy: prolonged energy price shocks and global shipping disruptions would raise input costs and weaken global demand, dragging on Chinese growth.

    Ali Wyne, senior research and advocacy adviser on U.S.-China relations at the International Crisis Group, added that Beijing is eager to highlight the perceived failures of U.S. policy in the region. “China welcomes the opportunity to suggest that it is helping mitigate a crisis of America’s making, especially as the Trump administration’s lack of a considered strategy for containing the fallout becomes more apparent,” Wyne said.

    The conflict took a major turn for the worse last Friday, when Iran shot down two U.S. military aircraft — the first such escalation in the five weeks since the war began. Days after claiming in a national address that the U.S. had “beaten and completely decimated Iran,” Trump told NBC News that the downing would not impact potential negotiations with the Iranian government.