作者: admin

  • Another round of US-Iran peace talks may take place in days: report

    Another round of US-Iran peace talks may take place in days: report

    Tensions across the Middle East remain on a knife’s edge as regional mediators work against the clock to organize a second round of peace negotiations between the United States and Iran in the coming days, according to a new report from the Wall Street Journal. Citing anonymous officials familiar with the diplomatic push, the outlet confirmed that the first round of talks, hosted last week by Pakistani authorities in Islamabad, wrapped up without a binding agreement, leaving a fragile two-week ceasefire teetering on collapse.

    Three core disputes have emerged as the primary barriers to a lasting diplomatic breakthrough. The first contentious issue is Iran’s recent demand to collect transit fees for commercial vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global chokepoint that carries roughly 20% of the world’s daily oil trade. The United States insists Iran reopen the waterway to all traffic without any new charges. Second, negotiators remain deadlocked over the future of Iran’s existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium, a material that can be refined to build nuclear weapons if processed to higher purity. Finally, Tehran is pushing hard for the full release of approximately $27 billion in state revenues that have been frozen by international sanctions imposed by Washington and its allies over the past decade.

    Pakistan, which took on the role of neutral host for the inaugural negotiating session, has emerged as the key broker leading efforts to restart talks before the ceasefire expires on April 22. A senior Pakistani government source told the Wall Street Journal that the entire diplomatic effort is focused on one urgent goal: “wrap it up before the deadline” to avert a full resumption of open hostilities between the two long-time adversaries. While the first round failed to deliver a breakthrough, Pakistani officials remain cautiously optimistic that continued engagement can bridge gaps between the two sides. Active bilateral consultations are already underway with both Washington and Tehran to lock in dates for the second round of talks in the near term, according to insiders.

  • Spanish PM calls for a multipolar world in Tsinghua speech

    Spanish PM calls for a multipolar world in Tsinghua speech

    On April 13, 2026, during the second day of his five-day official visit to China — his fourth trip to the country since taking office — Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez delivered a landmark address to faculty, students and university administrators at Beijing’s Tsinghua University, where he laid out a clear call for global leaders to embrace an emerging multipolar world order and reject outdated, dangerous zero-sum geopolitical thinking.

    Opening his argument with a centuries-old historical lesson, Sanchez drew on the experience of 16th-century Jesuit missionary Matteo Ricci, who arrived in China in 1583 carrying a European-produced world map that placed Europe at the center of the globe and pushed Asia to its geographic periphery. When Chinese cartographers questioned the lopsided framing that placed China on the margins, Ricci redrew the map with the Pacific Ocean at its center, a reworking that Sanchez framed as a timeless lesson for modern geopolitics.

    “Four hundred years have passed, but unfortunately, there are still people who see the world through that original, distorted map,” Sanchez told the Tsinghua audience. “That view is not only wrong, but very dangerous. It traps us in the past and limits our imagination of possibilities.”

    Sanchez emphasized that the current global shift is not a simple transfer of hegemonic power from one bloc to another, but a broad expansion of global multipolarity that touches both geopolitical influence and shared prosperity. Today, he noted, dynamic progress is unfolding simultaneously across regions with distinct cultural traditions and political systems — from China to Africa to Latin America — without requiring validation or permission from any single dominant power.

    “A multipolar world is not an assumption or an ideal, but a new reality. We cannot change it; we can only deny it or embrace it,” Sanchez said, confirming that Spain has made the deliberate choice to embrace this new reality with realism, a sense of shared responsibility, and optimistic hope for the future. He added that if Spain, China and Europe built shared prosperity in past decades, there is no reason the three actors cannot replicate that success in the modern era.

    Acknowledging that differences and healthy competition exist between nations, Sanchez stressed that lasting human progress stems from building common ground rather than deepening existing divides. He outlined that Spain seeks a bilateral relationship with China rooted in unwavering mutual respect: cooperating on shared global priorities whenever possible, competing constructively when necessary, and managing unavoidable differences through deliberate, respectful dialogue.

    To help a multipolar world order function effectively and equitably, Sanchez proposed three core actionable priorities for global leaders. First, he called for a fundamental reshaping of modern multilateralism, advocating for comprehensive United Nations reform that would expand the authority of the UN General Assembly, increase the representativeness of the UN Security Council, and build a more inclusive, democratic global decision-making mechanism.

    Second, Sanchez highlighted the urgent need to build fair, reciprocal global trade relations, expressing hope that China would continue expanding market access to help address existing trade imbalances across global markets. Third, he stressed that major global powers bear a greater responsibility to address shared transnational challenges, including climate change mitigation, global public health, artificial intelligence governance, nuclear nonproliferation and safety, and global poverty eradication. He noted that global investment in these critical areas has fallen by 23% since the start of 2026, a trend that puts all nations at risk.

    Sanchez also underscored the critical role of a unified European Union in maintaining global stability, noting that “Without a united EU, there will be no stable global order, just as without China’s participation, the world cannot achieve true stability and prosperity.”

    Closing his address, Sanchez invoked a recent image of four NASA astronauts observing Earth from outer space: a single, borderless blue planet that is unique and irreplaceable. “Humanity itself is a miracle, the only miracle in the world. Our responsibility is to make this miracle continue through mutual understanding and cooperation,” he said.

  • The US blockade of Iran is a gamble. Will it work?

    The US blockade of Iran is a gamble. Will it work?

    Against the backdrop of ongoing conflict between Iran, the United States, and Israel, Washington has advanced a new strategic gambit: a targeted naval blockade on maritime traffic moving in and out of Iranian ports in the Persian Gulf region. The proposal, which has been debated heavily among defense and policy circles, raises critical questions about military feasibility, strategic outcomes, and the potential ripple effects across global energy markets.

    Retired U.S. Rear Admiral Mark Montgomery affirmed to the BBC that the blockade operation is militarily achievable, arguing it carries far less risk than more aggressive alternative options floated by former President Donald Trump in recent weeks. Options including seizing Iran’s Kharg Island or running permanent military escorted convoys through the narrow Strait of Hormuz would put U.S. personnel in far greater danger, Montgomery noted. In the confined waters of the strait, U.S. forces would be directly exposed to retaliatory strikes from Iranian missiles, attack drones, and fast attack craft, with the added threat of naval mines complicating any large-scale movement.

    In contrast, a blockade positioned further offshore in the Gulf of Oman allows U.S. warships to maintain a safer operating distance while still tracking and intercepting vessels departing or heading to Iranian ports at will. The U.S. Navy already possesses all necessary capabilities for this mission, from special operations teams and maritime helicopters to fast interception craft. Past U.S. blockades on Venezuela and Cuba already demonstrate Washington’s long-standing ability to enforce such measures, and the January seizure of the Russian oil tanker *Marinera* in the North Atlantic proved that interdiction operations can be executed effectively almost anywhere on the globe.

    U.S. Central Command (Centcom) has stated the blockade will be “enforced impartially against vessels of all nations” entering or leaving Iranian ports and coastal areas, though vessels calling at non-Iranian terminals will not be detained. Ships carrying humanitarian aid will be allowed passage, but will be subject to mandatory inspection, the command confirmed.

    While the strategic logic of the move is clear, its long-term success remains far from guaranteed. Since the outbreak of the wider regional war, Iran has maintained steady exports of its own petrochemical products through the Gulf, earning billions of dollars in critical revenue while also disrupting hydrocarbon exports from other Gulf nations. A fully effective blockade would cut off that income stream, further weakening Iran’s already strained economy and pressuring its leadership to make concessions. But Iran has already demonstrated significant resilience after more than a month of coordinated U.S. and Israeli attacks, and many analysts believe the country is prepared to endure the added pressure of a blockade.

    Compounding this, a prolonged blockade will almost certainly push global oil prices even higher than current elevated levels. David Satterfield, a former U.S. special envoy for Middle East humanitarian affairs, told the BBC that Iranian leadership is confident it can outlast the pressure. “They believe they can outweigh this,” Satterfield explained. “Iran thinks the U.S. will face economic pain from spiking oil prices, and Gulf states will ultimately pressure Washington to reopen the strait to traffic.” He added that Washington has underestimated Iran’s long-term determination: “The Iranians believe that they can absorb more pain for a longer period than their opponents can.”

    Maritime industry observers have already begun tracking immediate shifts in shipping traffic around the strait following the announcement of the blockade. In the 48 hours after Trump’s initial announcement, the strait saw its highest volume of traffic since the war began in late February, with roughly 30 identifiable vessels (those with active automatic identification systems) passing through. Lloyd’s List editor-in-chief Richard Meade described the surge as “a flurry of vessels trying to get out” before the blockade took full effect, and several vessels already made U-turns to return to safer ports after the policy was announced. Maritime intelligence analyst Michelle Wiese Bockmann, who is closely monitoring current traffic, noted that “If I was a seafarer, I’d be very worried” about operating in the region now.

    For now, with a temporary ceasefire holding, the conflict has morphed into a standoff of competing blockades, with the global economy caught directly in the crossfire. U.S. officials are reportedly hoping that the new blockade will push China, the world’s largest importer of Iranian crude oil, to increase diplomatic pressure on Tehran to make concessions. Despite holding large strategic petroleum reserves, China cannot absorb a prolonged disruption to its Iranian oil supply without significant economic fallout.

    At this early stage, Donald Trump’s latest regional move remains a high-stakes gamble. The full economic and geopolitical impacts of the blockade are set to unfold in the coming weeks, with consequences that will be felt far beyond the Persian Gulf.

  • Iran’s military warns that no Gulf ports will be safe if its own threatened: report

    Iran’s military warns that no Gulf ports will be safe if its own threatened: report

    Tensions in the Persian Gulf region have spiked following a stark public warning from Iran’s military, which has asserted that no ports across the Gulf will be secure if Iran’s own security interests come under threat, according to recent regional media reports. The alert, dated April 13, 2026, comes at a moment of already heightened friction between Iran and Western powers, most notably the United States, with high-stakes diplomatic discussions between Washington and Tehran recently concluding in Pakistan without reaching any breakthrough agreement.

    The warning marks a significant escalation in rhetorical posturing from Iranian military leadership, amid long-running disputes over Iran’s nuclear program, regional military activity, and international sanctions levied against the country. For years, the Gulf has been a flashpoint for global geopolitical competition, as the waterway handles roughly a third of the world’s seaborne oil trade and a substantial share of global liquefied natural gas shipments. Any disruption to shipping or port operations in the region would send shockwaves through global energy markets, with far-reaching economic consequences for consumer and producer nations alike.

    This latest development follows a string of recent diplomatic engagements between US and Iranian representatives held in Pakistan, which ended without a consensus on core sticking points, leaving both nations bracing for the next round of pivotal negotiations. Analysts note that the harsh tone of Iran’s warning is likely intended to deter any potential military action or further economic pressure from the United States and its regional allies, by signaling that Tehran would be willing to disrupt critical infrastructure across the Gulf in the event of an attack on its own territory or core interests.

    Regional and global powers have long monitored military rhetoric from Iran closely, as any escalation in the region threatens to draw in outside actors and spark a wider conflict that would undermine global energy security and regional stability. As of now, no additional details have emerged regarding specific potential responses from the United States or other Gulf nations to Iran’s warning, with the situation remaining fluid ahead of upcoming diplomatic talks.

  • French lawmakers set to push bill criminalising speech on Israel

    French lawmakers set to push bill criminalising speech on Israel

    A deeply divisive bill that would impose sweeping new criminal penalties on a wide range of speech related to Israel is currently moving through France’s national parliament, triggering fierce public backlash and reigniting long-simmering debates over the boundaries of political expression in the country.

    The legislation, scheduled for its first reading in the National Assembly on April 16, has already earned unusual cross-party support, with backing even from far-right political factions. But the broad political consensus behind the bill has not quelled public opposition: more than 500,000 people have signed a public petition demanding the legislation be scrapped, and organized protests against the measure have spread across multiple French cities as critics warn it poses an unprecedented threat to core free speech protections.

    The proposal is the brainchild of sitting French MP Caroline Yadan, a prominent lawmaker who publicly identifies as an “unconditional” supporter of Israel. Yadan represents the 8th constituency for French citizens living overseas, a district where Israeli residents make up a substantial share of the voting electorate, and she has centered her entire political tenure on advancing policies that defend Israeli actions and interests. She has already openly broken with French President Emmanuel Macron over his official recognition of the Palestinian people’s right to statehood, and publicly condemned Macron in October 2024 after the president called for a halt to French weapons deliveries to Israel amid Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza. Yadan, who is Jewish, has defended the bill with an unsubstantiated claim that “For fifteen years, Jews have been killed in France ‘in the name of Gaza.’”

    If enacted, the bill would introduce a series of far-reaching new criminal offenses. It would make it a crime to deny Israel’s right to exist, and explicitly criminalize comparisons between the Israeli state and Nazi Germany — a legal protection that is not extended to France itself. The legislation also expands existing terrorism-related statutes to cover what the text labels “implicit” provocation, broadening the definition of “apology for terrorism” to include the “minimising or trivialising” of terror attacks.

    Under the bill’s first article, anyone found guilty of speech interpreted as justifying or reframing acts designated as terrorism could face up to five years in prison and substantial financial fines. This broad language could even criminalize framing such acts as “resistance,” or providing contextual background that courts deem insufficiently condemnatory. Critics note the new wording would allow courts to treat attempts to explain the political root causes of violence as criminal acts, opening the door to widespread prosecution of dissenting political speech.

    Marc Trevidic, a former French anti-terrorism judge, has issued a sharp public warning about the dangerous implications of the bill’s vague wording. “Implicit provocation to terrorism: do you realize what that means? Becoming a censor of other people’s thoughts, trying to guess what a person really meant,” Trevidic said.

    One high-profile provision expands existing French laws on crimes against humanity, explicitly classifying any comparison between Israel and Nazi Germany as “outrageous trivialization” of the Holocaust, a criminal offense under the new legislation. The bill’s preamble makes its core intent unambiguous: it explicitly states that framing the Israeli state as equivalent to the Nazi regime must be treated as a criminal act, effectively shielding Israel from one of the most politically charged forms of criticism directed at the country’s policies.

    The legislation builds on France’s already strict existing speech regulations, which have criminalized Holocaust denial under the 1990 Gayssot Act for decades. But legal experts and free speech advocates note the new measures go far beyond existing prohibitions, extending criminal liability into a broad swathe of mainstream political expression. As the first parliamentary vote approaches, the clash between the bill’s cross-party backers and mass public opposition has put France’s commitment to free expression under unprecedented national scrutiny.

  • Norwegian effectively cured of HIV after transplant from brother

    Norwegian effectively cured of HIV after transplant from brother

    In a groundbreaking medical announcement made Monday, a 63-year-old Norwegian man has been pronounced functionally cured of HIV, marking one of the raiest and most hopeful breakthroughs in global HIV research in recent years. Dubbed the “Oslo patient,” he becomes the first person worldwide to achieve long-term HIV remission following a stem cell transplant from a related family member, joining a small group of fewer than 10 people globally who have reached this milestone after receiving transplants to treat concurrent blood cancer.

    The patient had lived with an HIV diagnosis since 2006, before receiving a devastating secondary diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome, a life-threatening blood cancer, in 2017. His care team at Oslo University Hospital launched a search for a suitable donor that could address both conditions, ultimately turning to the patient’s older brother when no matching unrelated donor with the required genetic trait was found. In a stunning twist of fate revealed on the day of the 2020 transplant, doctors discovered the brother unknowingly carried the rare CCR5Δ32 genetic mutation—an alteration that blocks HIV from entering and infecting human immune cells. Only 1% of northern European populations carry this rare protective mutation.

    “It was like winning the lottery twice,” lead study author Dr. Anders Eivind Myhre, of Oslo University Hospital, told Agence France-Presse. The case study detailing the achievement was published in the journal *Nature Microbiology*. Two years post-transplant, when the patient discontinued his daily antiretroviral therapy that had long kept his viral load suppressed, researchers found no trace of replicating HIV in samples of his blood, bone marrow, or intestinal tissue. “For all practical purposes, we are quite certain that he is cured,” Myhre confirmed. The patient, who has chosen to remain anonymous, is now thriving with abundant energy and reports enjoying a full, unrestricted life, according to his care team.

    Unlike the handful of prior cured HIV cases that relied on unrelated donor transplants, the Oslo case marks the first time a successful cure has been achieved with a family member donor. Study co-author Dr. Marius Troseid of the University of Oslo explained that the patient’s entire immune system has been fully replaced by the donor’s genetically resistant cells—a complete reconstitution that has been clearly documented in both his bone marrow and gut tissue for the first time in any cured HIV patient. Given his current excellent health, Troseid noted that the “Oslo patient” label may no longer fit: “The Oslo patient is perhaps no longer a patient. At least he doesn’t feel like it.”

    This achievement builds on a decades-long line of incremental breakthroughs, starting with the first ever declared HIV cure, that of Timothy Ray Brown, the “Berlin patient,” in 2008. Subsequent cases have since been reported in London, New York, Geneva, Düsseldorf, and other cities around the world, with one 2024 case even achieving long-term remission without a donor carrying two copies of the mutated CCR5 gene, expanding researchers’ understanding of what makes a cure possible.

    Crucially, experts stress that the high-risk, invasive stem cell transplant procedure remains only an option for the small subset of people living with HIV who also have a life-threatening blood cancer, making it completely unfeasible for the more than 38 million people globally living with HIV. Still, researchers remain optimistic that the insights gained from studying these rare, successful cases will deepen scientific understanding of how HIV persists in the body and pave the way for a widely accessible cure that can help all people living with the virus end their lifelong reliance on antiretroviral treatment.

  • Monster typhoon in the Pacific Ocean is bearing down on group of remote US islands

    Monster typhoon in the Pacific Ocean is bearing down on group of remote US islands

    The strongest tropical cyclone recorded on Earth so far this year, Super Typhoon Sinlaku, is advancing rapidly toward remote U.S. island territories in the Western Pacific, with emergency officials bracing for catastrophic wind damage, widespread flooding, and destructive rainfall as the storm nears landfall. As of Monday, the storm had maintained sustained maximum winds of 173 miles per hour (278 kilometers per hour), placing it well within the super typhoon classification—an intensity category equivalent to a Category 4 or 5 Atlantic hurricane, reserved for the North Pacific’s most powerful systems. The Joint Typhoon Warning Center, which has tracked super typhoons in the region since 1947, projects Sinlaku will make landfall on the Northern Mariana Islands Tuesday, and will retain Category 4 or 5 strength even as it weakens slightly over the coming 48 hours. The storm’s projected path places the islands of Rota, Tinian, and Saipan directly at risk, while Guam, a major U.S. territory that hosts key American military installations, has already been placed under a tropical storm warning, with damaging winds expected to begin impacting the island as early as Monday. U.S. Coast Guard officials first issued high wind and flood warnings for Guam over the weekend, and military leaders have ordered service members to prepare for the storm and shelter in place—an urgent step that comes just two years after Typhoon Mawar knocked out power across Guam for days, causing widespread disruption. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump approved emergency disaster declarations for both Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, unlocking federal resources to support local emergency response efforts and speed assistance to affected communities after the storm passes. Super typhoons are the highest classification for tropical cyclones that form in the northwestern Pacific, the ocean basin that consistently produces Earth’s most intense storm systems. To qualify as a super typhoon, a cyclone must produce sustained winds of at least 150 mph (240 kph), and more than 300 such storms have been recorded by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center since the naming convention was adopted in 1947. The approaching storm aligns with recent research finding that rising ocean temperatures driven by climate change are supercharging tropical cyclone intensity, increasing the risk of extreme damage when powerful storms make landfall.

  • Ruili celebrates annual Water-Splashing Festival with blessings

    Ruili celebrates annual Water-Splashing Festival with blessings

    Nestled in southwest China’s Yunnan Province within the Dehong Dai and Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, the border city of Ruili came alive with vibrant color, joyful laughter and age-old tradition over the weekend of April 11, 2026, as it hosted its iconic annual Water-Splashing Festival. The event, a cornerstone of local Dai cultural identity that marks the beginning of the Dai New Year, drew participants from dozens of ethnic communities across the region, turning the city into a sprawling celebration of shared heritage and collective goodwill.

    The festivities kicked off with a grand opening ceremony that placed intangible cultural heritage front and center. Traditional performances from the Dai and De’ang ethnic groups dominated the stage, bringing centuries-old artistic practices to life for attendees. The iconic peacock dance, renowned for its graceful, fluid movements that mimic the elegant bird central to Dai mythology, blended seamlessly with the thunderous, rhythmic elephant-foot drum dance. Every beat of the large carved drums and every fluid gesture of the dancers held deep cultural meaning, captivating onlookers and setting a festive tone for the days of celebration ahead.

    Once the official opening concluded, the celebration spilled out onto the streets and riverbanks of Ruili, particularly along the scenic shoreline of the Ruili River. Equipped with everything from traditional wooden basins to modern water guns, participants of all ages and ethnic backgrounds rushed into the fun, splashing one another with cool, refreshing water as a symbolic gesture of blessing. For generations, this ritual has carried profound meaning: the water is believed to wash away misfortunes and negativity from the past year, clearing the way for good luck, prosperity and health in the coming months.

    Joyful shouts and peals of laughter echoed across the riverbank as crowds sang, danced and joined together in the fun, embodying the spirit of unity that defines the festival. What began as a sacred cultural observance for local ethnic communities has grown into an inclusive event that brings together people from all walks of life, showcasing the rich multicultural tapestry of southwest China and preserving beloved traditions for new generations.

  • Pope Leo responds to Trump, saying he will continue to ‘speak out’

    Pope Leo responds to Trump, saying he will continue to ‘speak out’

    A growing diplomatic and religious rift has emerged between U.S. former President Donald Trump and Pope Leo XIV, the first American-born pontiff in Roman Catholic history, after the pontiff’s public rebuke of Trump’s threats against Iran triggered a sharp personal attack from the former president.

    The conflict began when Pope Leo XIV publicly pushed back against aggressive rhetoric from Trump targeting the Islamic Republic of Iran, warning that escalatory threats risked sparking broader regional instability and endangering civilian lives across the Middle East. That condemnation quickly prompted a retaliatory attack from Trump, who took aim at the pontiff’s leadership and his unprecedented role as the first U.S. citizen to lead the global Catholic Church.

    In a recent public statement responding to Trump’s criticism, Pope Leo XIV made clear that his commitment to advocating for peace and global justice would not be silenced. The pontiff reaffirmed that the Catholic Church has long played a role in speaking out against aggression and promoting diplomatic solutions to global conflict, and that his position on Iran was rooted in that longstanding tradition, rather than political alignment.

    Observers note that the exchange marks a rare high-profile clash between a sitting (and future prospective) U.S. political leader and the head of the Catholic Church, particularly given the historic context of Pope Leo XIV’s ascension as the first American pope. The disagreement also highlights the growing intersection of religious leadership and global political discourse, as the pontiff continues to weigh in on pressing international security issues that impact millions of people worldwide.

  • US judge dismisses $10bn Trump defamation suit against Wall Street Journal

    US judge dismisses $10bn Trump defamation suit against Wall Street Journal

    A Florida federal judge has tossed out a high-profile defamation lawsuit brought by former President and current 2024 presidential candidate Donald Trump against the Wall Street Journal, its parent company News Corp, and media magnate Rupert Murdoch, stemming from a 2024 report linking Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The dismissal opens the door for Trump to refile an amended complaint, setting the stage for a continued legal battle over the controversial reporting.

    Trump first launched the suit last summer, demanding no less than $10 billion in damages over the Journal’s exclusive July 17 report. The story centered on a handwritten entry in a 2003 birthday book presented to Epstein, which the outlet claimed included Trump’s name and a crude drawing of a woman’s body. The former president has long maintained the entry is a fabrication, arguing the publication’s claims amounted to damaging defamation that tarnished his reputation.

    In his 12-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles made clear that Trump failed to meet the stringent legal standard required to proceed with a defamation claim brought by a public figure. Under longstanding U.S. defamation law, public figures must prove a news outlet acted with “actual malice” — meaning the organization either knew the reporting was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth — to win a damages claim. Gayles wrote that Trump had come “nowhere close” to satisfying this high legal threshold, and that the former president had not plausibly alleged the Journal published the story with malicious intent.

    Crucially, the judge dismissed the case without prejudice, a procedural ruling that allows Trump to submit an amended, corrected lawsuit by the court’s April 27 deadline. In response to the ruling, a lawyer for Trump told CBS News — the U.S. news partner of the BBC — that the former president intends to refile what he called a “powerhouse” amended suit. The legal team added that Trump remains committed to “hold accountable those who traffic in Fake News to mislead the American People.”

    The reporting at the center of the case has been a flashpoint in national conversations about Trump’s long-rumored ties to Epstein, the wealthy financier who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. Weeks after the Journal published its original report, Democratic lawmakers released an image of the handwritten birthday note to the public on social media, ahead of the scheduled release of a trove of sealed court documents related to Epstein’s case. Though the Journal never published the image itself, the details of the outlet’s description of the note matched the image released by lawmakers. Trump has repeatedly denied writing the entry, calling it a “fake thing” fabricated to hurt his political standing.