A fiery new exchange at a recent Australian Senate hearing has reignited debate over the federal government’s tax and public service pricing policies, with independent Senator David Pocock doubling down on criticism of the imbalance between petroleum tax revenue and sky-high passport fees.
At Thursday’s hearing, Pocock highlighted a striking comparison that underscores what he calls the government’s lopsided policy framework: by the end of the current decade, total annual revenue collected from Australian passport fees will only be a few hundred million dollars lower than the total annual take from the Petroleum Resources Rent Tax (PRRT)—the levy designed to deliver public returns from the country’s massive offshore liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports.
As one of the world’s top LNG exporters, Australia’s PRRT system has faced sustained scrutiny from Pocock, who has repeatedly called out the low revenue it generates for public coffers. The latest data he cited shows that by the 2029-30 financial year, annual revenue from passport services is projected to hit as much as AUD 1.2 billion, up from more than AUD 1 billion forecast for the 2024-25 financial year. By comparison, the PRRT is on track to bring in just a few hundred million more than that figure annually by the end of the decade.
When it comes to passport pricing, Australia already holds the unenviable title of having some of the most expensive passport fees in the developed world. Starting in 2026, an adult renewing a 10-year passport will pay AUD 422, while seniors and children will pay AUD 213 for a five-year document. Volume projections from government officials show the government is expected to issue up to 2.2 million passports in the current financial year, rising to 2.5 million annually by next financial year.
Pocock argued that the gap between these two revenue streams is indefensible. “As one of the biggest gas exporters in the world, those two things just don’t seem to square … that’s an absurd comparison,” he told the committee. He also noted that Australian passport costs far outpace prices in comparable nations: a Canadian 10-year passport costs roughly AUD 170, a British equivalent is AUD 195, a New Zealand passport comes in at AUD 225, and a U.S. passport is AUD 250—all less than 60% of the cost of an Australian adult passport. In some cases, Australians pay nearly double what citizens of other wealthy nations pay for the same official document.
Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong defended the federal Labor government’s policies on both fronts, pushing back against Pocock’s criticism. Wong acknowledged understanding Pocock’s perspective but argued the government has crafted a balanced approach that serves the national interest when it comes to gas policy.
On the topic of passports, Wong noted that the current government has invested heavily in upgrading the Australian passport system, producing a high-security, advanced travel document that grants Australian citizens visa-free access to more than 120 countries around the world—a key benefit that justifies current pricing. She added that the government has no plans to adjust passport pricing outside of pre-approved inflation indexation, which is already baked into the projected revenue increases.
When asked why other high-income nations charge far less for passports, Wong responded that she could not speak to the pricing policies of other governments, as she is not responsible for their operations.
This latest exchange is part of a long-running campaign by Pocock to overhaul the PRRT system, which he argues fails to deliver adequate public returns from Australia’s non-renewable natural resources. In an earlier Senate hearing, Pocock drew similar criticism by pointing out that mid-year financial projections for 2025-26 showed the PRRT would generate only around AUD 1.5 billion in annual revenue—less than the AUD 2.7 billion the government collects annually in beer taxes. “How do we live in a country that exports — one of the biggest gas exporters in the world — and we’re getting more tax from beer than PRRT,” he asked at the time.
In response to ongoing criticism, the government has defended the PRRT and broader national gas arrangements as part of a balanced policy framework. Since the outbreak of conflict in the Middle East, officials have emphasized that Australia has a responsibility to act as a reliable global energy partner, and the current tax structure accounts for both public revenue needs and broader energy security commitments, alongside additional corporate tax contributions from gas producers.