Why the US economy stays strong despite Trump’s shockwaves

Against widespread expert predictions that the U.S. would cede its economic growth lead following the 2025 implementation of sweeping global tariffs and the 2026 outbreak of conflict with Iran, new GDP data confirms the American economy has maintained a substantial performance gap over the European Union. Five-year average annual national income growth hits 3.3% in the U.S., compared to just 2.6% for the EU. Most recently, year-on-year first quarter 2026 GDP growth reached 2.6% in the U.S., while the EU recorded only 0.7% expansion.

Economists have identified a handful of core structural and policy factors that explain this ongoing U.S. economic resilience, starting with far more expansionary fiscal policy. While most European governments run modest budget deficits, the U.S. consistently maintains much wider gaps between government spending and tax revenue. In 2025, the average EU deficit stood at 3.1% of GDP, while the U.S. deficit hit 5.8% of GDP – delivering a far stronger demand stimulus to the economy. By injecting more income into households through public payrolls and into suppliers through government procurement, U.S. fiscal policy has lifted aggregate demand, supported output growth and kept unemployment lower than European levels.

A second, equally critical driver is the U.S.’s far larger investment in innovation and emerging technology. As early as 2021, the EU spent 270 billion euros less than the U.S. on research and development, with most European innovation spending concentrated in long-established legacy sectors such as traditional automaking rather than next-generation technologies. Since 2025, U.S. investment has been heavily focused on artificial intelligence, allowing the country to solidify its dominance over global digital platforms and cutting-edge tech. The widespread adoption of AI across U.S. industries has widened the U.S. lead in labor productivity growth: since 2019, U.S. output per hour in professional services has jumped more than 18%, compared to just 5% across the EU.

These economy-wide productivity gains have translated into modest but consistent growth in U.S. inflation-adjusted real wages, sustaining steady consumer demand while also driving strong corporate profit growth that has pushed U.S. stock markets to repeated record highs. By contrast, average EU real wages have barely expanded over the past two decades, and European corporate profits remain muted.

This U.S. tech leadership does face headwinds, however: the Trump administration’s strict immigration clampdown, which includes restrictions on skilled scientists and international students, has shaved an estimated 0.8 percentage points off annual U.S. GDP growth compared to pre-2025 net immigration trends. Still, the U.S. retains a key structural advantage for tech growth: looser regulatory frameworks for emerging innovation, compared to the EU’s stricter oversight and China’s state-directed innovation model. Even though the EU produces a similar number of early-stage tech startups as the U.S., most European scaleups relocate to the U.S. to access capital and a more permissive business environment as they expand.

A third major advantage for U.S. industry is substantially lower energy costs than in Europe. The U.S. produces far more fossil fuels than the EU and applies lower tax rates to energy, while also rapidly scaling cheap renewable energy capacity despite the current administration’s public skepticism of solar and wind power. While this reliance on fossil fuels creates long-term climate-related economic vulnerability, it has delivered an immediate cost advantage that has supported U.S. manufacturing regeneration and allowed American firms to capture a large share of global demand for data-intensive services such as e-commerce and generative AI.

The final, often-overlooked driver of U.S. economic outperformance is what former French finance minister Valéry Giscard d’Estaing famously called the U.S.’s “exorbitant privilege” as the issuer of the world’s primary reserve currency. Like most large growing economies, the U.S. runs a substantial current account deficit, as it consumes more goods and services than it produces domestically, requiring continuous borrowing from global creditors to cover the gap. For most economies, this persistent deficit would trigger currency devaluation, higher inflation, or a forced period of slower growth to rebalance the country’s international position. But because the U.S. dollar dominates global commodity trade and is seen as a safe haven asset even during global shocks – including conflicts triggered by U.S. foreign policy – global investors consistently move capital into U.S. assets to finance the deficit, keeping borrowing costs low and growth supported.

To date, efforts to challenge the dollar’s dominance have made little headway. The EU’s plans to unify its fragmented financial markets to strengthen the euro’s global role have progressed slowly and were set back significantly by the UK’s 2016 Brexit withdrawal, which stripped the bloc of its largest global financial center. Meanwhile, alternative reserve currency initiatives from China, Russia and major oil-exporting nations have failed to gain widespread traction. Even so, the dollar’s exorbitant privilege carries downsides for the U.S.: strong capital inflows that appreciate the dollar make U.S. exports less competitive globally, and the Federal Reserve must account for global spillovers when adjusting interest rates, complicating domestic inflation control. Paradoxically, however, the large spending power of U.S. consumers and businesses, sustained by this global financing system, often leaves the U.S. acting as a global engine of growth for other regions during periods of slowdown.

Despite the consistent strong economic growth that has defied post-2025 predictions, the performance gap has not translated into political gains for the Trump administration. Just as the steady 2021-2024 expansion failed to boost the political standing of Trump’s predecessor Joe Biden, the continuing growth trend has left Trump with a record-low approval rating of just 36%. This disconnect stems from the uneven nature of U.S. growth: driven by large fiscal deficits and rising corporate profits, the expansion has only delivered marginal wage gains for most American households, who still struggle with persistent high prices and growing affordability pressures for everyday living costs.