标签： Oceania

A dramatic U.S. military operation culminating in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has triggered widespread international condemnation, drawing sharp criticism from both American allies and adversaries alike. The pre-dawn assault on Caracas, which involved airstrikes and special forces, resulted in Maduro and his wife being transported to New York to face serious drug-trafficking and weapons charges.

President Donald Trump’s declaration that the United States would ‘run’ Venezuela and access its substantial oil reserves, accompanied by an image of a blindfolded and handcuffed Maduro on a U.S. naval vessel, has intensified global scrutiny. The operation has sparked a complex diplomatic firestorm, revealing deep divisions in the international community’s response to unilateral military action.

Nations with longstanding ties to Caracas, including China, Russia, and Iran, issued swift condemnations. China’s Foreign Affairs Ministry denounced the operation as a ‘clear violation of international law,’ while Russia demanded the immediate release of ‘the legally elected president of a sovereign country.’ Iran similarly condemned what it termed a ‘flagrant violation of national sovereignty.’

Remarkably, Washington’s traditional European allies expressed significant reservations. France emphasized that no solution to Venezuela’s crisis could be externally imposed, with President Emmanuel Macron advocating for political transition under opposition figure Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia. Spain warned the intervention ‘pushes the region toward a horizon of uncertainty and militarism,’ while Germany acknowledged the legal complexity of the operation despite recognizing Maduro’s disastrous leadership.

The European Union collectively urged respect for international law while noting Maduro’s lack of legitimacy, though candidate country North Macedonia and Balkan allies Albania and Kosovo broke ranks to support Washington. Britain adopted a nuanced stance, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer stating the UK would ‘shed no tears’ over Maduro’s demise while planning discussions with U.S. counterparts about the evolving situation.

Italy’s far-right Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni provided rare European support, characterizing the operation as ‘legitimate and defensive.’ Israel hailed American action as leadership of ‘the free world,’ while Ukraine focused criticism on Maduro’s repressive governance rather than addressing the military operation’s legality.

Beyond official government reactions, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed deep alarm, warning the operation could ‘constitute a dangerous precedent’ in international relations. The broader implications for regional stability were emphasized by Mexico and Colombia, with the latter predicting a humanitarian crisis resulting from what it termed an ‘assault on the sovereignty of Latin America.’

Venezuela has been plunged into a profound constitutional crisis following an unprecedented US military operation that resulted in the capture and extradition of President Nicolás Maduro to face criminal charges in New York. The dramatic pre-dawn raid, executed by American special forces in Caracas, represents one of the most significant interventions in Latin America by the United States in decades.

According to military officials, approximately 150 aircraft participated in the coordinated operation that targeted multiple strategic locations throughout the Venezuelan capital. General Dan Caine confirmed that intelligence operatives had spent months meticulously tracking Maduro’s routines and personal habits prior to the capture. The Venezuelan leader and his wife were apprehended without resistance and transported via US government aircraft to a military facility before being transferred to New York City.

The White House released footage showing Maduro handcuffed and wearing sandals while being escorted through a Drug Enforcement Administration facility. The 63-year-old leader was heard remarking ‘Good night, happy new year’ in English during the processing.

President Trump announced that cabinet members would be designated to assume administrative control of Venezuela while indicating possible extended military deployment. ‘We’re not afraid of boots on the ground,’ Trump stated, adding that US forces would remain until ‘the proper transition can take place.’ Surprisingly, Trump expressed willingness to collaborate with Maduro’s vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, rather than US-backed opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, whom he dismissed as lacking sufficient support.

The operation has triggered international condemnation, with China denouncing the action as a ‘clear violation of international law’ and demanding Maduro’s immediate release. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed deep concern that ‘the rules of international law have not been respected,’ while France warned that solutions cannot be ‘imposed from outside.’ The UN Security Council has scheduled an emergency meeting to address the escalating crisis.

Venezuela’s Supreme Court has subsequently ordered Rodriguez to assume presidential powers in an acting capacity, creating competing claims to legitimate governance. The political vacuum has left the country’s future uncertain despite Trump’s promises that major US oil companies would invest billions to rehabilitate Venezuela’s energy infrastructure.

Twelve hours following a clandestine United States military operation targeting Venezuelan leadership, the port city of La Guaira north of Caracas remained shrouded in smoke, its infrastructure scarred by precision airstrikes. The mission, designed to apprehend and extract President Nicolás Maduro from his stronghold, represents an unprecedented escalation in the protracted geopolitical standoff between Washington and Caracas.

Eyewitness accounts describe scenes of devastation and collective trauma. Alpidio Lovera, a 47-year-old resident, recounted the terrifying sequence of events: “First we saw the flash and then the explosion,” prompting him to flee with his pregnant wife to higher ground. The force of the strikes deformed shipping containers, blew out windows of public buildings, and ripped roofs from residential houses, though official reports noted no casualties in the area.

The psychological impact on residents was profound. Linda Unamuno, 39, broke into sobs describing how the blast destroyed her roof, initially mistaking the attack for another natural disaster reminiscent of the catastrophic 1999 landslide that claimed thousands of lives. “I saw the fire from the airstrikes. It was traumatizing,” she stated, adding she “wished it on no-one.”

While US President Donald Trump publicly confirmed Maduro’s capture with an image of the handcuffed and blindfolded leader aboard a US warship, skepticism persists among segments of the Venezuelan population. Pensioner Alirio Elista, 68, whose water tank was damaged in the strikes, dismissed the news as “fake” and criticized those celebrating the intervention. His weekly pension of under half a dollar “doesn’t pay for anything,” he complained, highlighting the desperate economic conditions that have plagued the country under Maduro’s rule.

The operation culminates years of US sanctions and alleged coup plots against Maduro, whose administration presided over rampant inflation and critical shortages of fuel, medicine, and basic foodstuffs despite Venezuela possessing the world’s largest proven oil reserves. Trump’s vision of US oil companies revitalizing Venezuela’s crumbling infrastructure contrasts sharply with local expectations of a long recovery. As Elista predicted: “We’ll need at least 15 years to get back to where we were.”

Venezuelan expatriates across the globe erupted in emotional celebrations following the military capture of President Nicolás Maduro by United States forces. The operation, which resulted in Maduro’s extradition to New York to face drug trafficking charges, triggered massive gatherings from Santiago to Madrid as diasporic communities expressed overwhelming relief after years of economic hardship and political repression.

In Santiago, Chile, thousands congregated in a vibrant sea of yellow, blue, and red national flags. Yurimar Rojas, a local street vendor, encapsulated the collective sentiment shouting over the cheering crowds, “At last we’ll be able to go back home!” This hope was echoed by Yasmery Gallardo, 61, who announced immediate plans to return after eight years abroad. The celebrations carried particular significance in Chile, where many Venezuelans face uncertainty under incoming far-right President José Antonio Kast’s proposed migrant deportation policies.

Similar scenes unfolded in Miami where revelers chanted gratitude toward former US President Donald Trump, whom they credit for enabling the operation. Ana Gonzalez declared, “Today, the dreams of Venezuelans abroad came true,” while Anabela Ramos celebrated the culmination of a 27-year wait for political change.

Madrid witnessed profound emotional displays as Pedro Marcano, 47, stated his intention to return home after 11 years, though he cautioned that clarity regarding Venezuela’s political future remained necessary. The gathering observed a moment of silence for a broadcast by opposition leader María Corina Machado, whose message of freedom moved many to tears despite US assertions questioning her capacity to lead.

While most celebrations continued peacefully, dissenting voices emerged protesting American interventionism. Demonstrators gathered outside US embassies in Mexico City and Buenos Aires, waving anti-war banners and chanting slogans like “Out, Yankees, out!” arguing against perceived American imperialism and resource exploitation.

The developments leave Venezuela’s political landscape in flux. While Vice President Delcy Rodríguez insisted Maduro remains the legitimate leader and promised to defend national sovereignty, the US administration has committed to overseeing transitional governance. For countless Venezuelans who fled economic collapse and humanitarian crisis, however, the events represent long-awaited justice and the potential for national healing.

Venezuelan expatriates in Florida experienced a wave of emotional whiplash this weekend as celebrations over Nicolas Maduro’s dramatic capture by U.S. forces gave way to apprehension about their homeland’s political future. The community in Doral—where Venezuelans constitute over 40% of the population—initially erupted in spontaneous celebration upon learning of the pre-dawn military operation that apprehended the controversial leader.

The scenes outside El Arepazo restaurant reflected both catharsis and anxiety. Douglas Zarzalejo, a 55-year-old who fled Venezuela eleven years ago, captured the prevailing sentiment: “We woke to news that justice finally prevailed, yet we recognize our nation’s recovery has merely begun.” Many waved Venezuelan flags and embraced strangers, their celebrations representing years of pent-up frustration with Maduro’s administration, which they blame for transforming an oil-rich nation into an economic catastrophe characterized by widespread shortages and political repression.

President Trump’s subsequent remarks at Mar-a-Lago tempered the initial euphoria. His announcement that the U.S. would administer Venezuela temporarily and his endorsement of Maduro’s vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, as a cooperative partner generated concern. More startling was his dismissal of opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, whom the diaspora considers their legitimate representative. This contradicted international consensus that Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia—Machado’s substitute candidate—had rightfully won the 2024 election.

The emotional complexity was palpable. Liz Vivas, 39, wept while recalling her husband who disappeared after criticizing Maduro’s government in 2018. “Though I never received closure,” she stated, “I finally feel justice has been served.” Yet others like Raul Chavez expressed reservations: “I possess conflicting emotions. While desperately wanting freedom for Venezuela, I equally value its independence from foreign control.”

The developments reveal a diaspora torn between gratitude for Maduro’s removal and skepticism about America’s subsequent intentions, particularly regarding Venezuela’s oil resources. The community now watches anxiously to see whether this intervention will yield genuine self-determination or merely substitute one form of external influence for another.