标签: Oceania

大洋洲

  • Free vaccines and booster calls: NSW reveals ‘targeted’ approach to diphtheria outbreak as cases hit 35yr high

    Free vaccines and booster calls: NSW reveals ‘targeted’ approach to diphtheria outbreak as cases hit 35yr high

    Australia is facing a public health emergency as a diphtheria outbreak surges to levels not recorded in 35 years, pushing national case counts above 220. In response to the growing crisis, New South Wales (NSW) has announced a targeted, free vaccination initiative to curb the spread of the potentially fatal bacterial disease and boost lagging immunization rates across the state.

    NSW Health Minister Ryan Park unveiled the plan at a Thursday press conference, issuing an urgent public call for residents to verify that their diphtheria vaccinations are up to date. Under the new policy, all doses and boosters will be provided at no cost to patients at Aboriginal Medical Services (AMS) and general practitioner (GP) clinics across NSW. Free access is also extended to all individuals under 19 years of age seeking immunization.

    Park emphasized that immunization rates across NSW remain far lower than public health officials recommend, with particularly concerning gaps in coverage among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. The state’s intervention comes in response to rising cases nationally, most of which are concentrated in the Northern Territory – the region that recorded Australia’s first diphtheria-related death in nearly a decade in recent weeks. While the outbreak is centered in northern Australia, cases have now spread across state borders: Queensland and South Australia have both reported detections, and NSW confirmed its first cases of the current outbreak earlier this week.

    In a direct appeal to First Nations communities, Park specifically urged any Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander resident who has not received a diphtheria booster in the last 10 years to access free immunization through their local AMS or GP. “Diphtheria has taken hold in some parts of northern Australia, and we need to keep people safe,” Park said. “The best way to do that is vaccination.”

    As Australia’s most populous state with the country’s largest public health system and most extensive resources, NSW has committed to ongoing monitoring of the outbreak and stands ready to expand its response if needed. Park noted that the diphtheria outbreak is a shared national challenge, and NSW is willing to contribute additional support to affected regions as the situation evolves.

    Diphtheria is a highly contagious bacterial infection that can cause severe respiratory damage, heart and nerve complications, and even death in unvaccinated individuals. Public health officials have long emphasized that widespread immunization is the most effective prevention strategy against the disease, which was largely controlled in high-income countries through routine vaccination programs for decades.

  • Rich nations topped $100 bn climate finance goal again in 2023, 2024: OECD

    Rich nations topped $100 bn climate finance goal again in 2023, 2024: OECD

    For the third consecutive year, high-income economies have exceeded the $100 billion annual climate finance commitment to low- and middle-income nations, new data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) confirms. Yet growing geopolitical and economic headwinds have cast serious uncertainty over whether wealthy countries can deliver on an even larger, newly agreed climate aid target, leaving vulnerable nations waiting for much-needed support to tackle the climate crisis.

    The original promise to mobilize $100 billion per year for climate action in developing countries by 2020 was a landmark commitment to address climate inequality: developing nations contribute the least to historical greenhouse gas emissions, yet bear the brunt of worsening extreme weather and need investment to shift to clean energy and adapt to climate impacts. For years, wealthy nations failed to hit the target, only hitting the mark for the first time in 2022 after an extension of the deadline to 2025. Since then, contributions have steadily grown: OECD tracking data shows total climate finance hit $115.9 billion in 2022, jumped to $132.8 billion in 2023, and rose slightly to $136.7 billion in 2024.

    Breaking down the 2024 figures reveals a shifting mix of funding sources. Public sector climate finance fell 2.6% year-over-year to $101.6 billion, but private sector contributions surged 33% to reach $35 billion. Raphael Jachnik, who led the OECD’s analysis, told AFP the dip in bilateral public funding largely reflected a return to pre-2023 trends after an unusually large one-year increase in public contributions the previous year. The OECD also noted that full data for 2025, the final year of the original $100 billion commitment, will not be available until 2027 at the earliest.

    Climate finance has been one of the most divisive issues at UN climate talks for decades, with developing nations growing increasingly frustrated by repeated delays and unmet promises from wealthy governments. At the 2024 COP29 summit held in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to a new collective target: $300 billion in annual climate finance by 2035. They also set a broader, less specific goal of mobilizing $1.3 trillion per year from combined public and private sources by 2035. But even this new target is widely viewed as insufficient by vulnerable developing countries, and multiple major headwinds now threaten its delivery.

    The most significant disruption comes from the United States, where climate sceptic Donald Trump returned to the presidency in 2024. Since taking office, Trump has withdrawn the US from active global climate diplomacy and made deep cuts to the country’s foreign aid programs, eliminating a core source of global climate finance. The European Union, currently the largest single contributor to international climate finance, is grappling with domestic budget pressures and has redirected large sums of public spending to military investment amid ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, leaving less fiscal space for climate aid.

    Turkey’s Climate Minister Murat Kurum, who will chair the upcoming COP31 climate summit hosted by Ankara this November, has made clear he will pressure wealthy nations to deliver on their new commitments. Speaking at a climate ministerial gathering in Copenhagen this week, Kurum said: “It is easy to say we support global climate action. But promises must be kept. I will hold donors accountable for the commitments they made under the $300 billion Baku finance goal.”

    Wealthy Western nations have pushed to expand the pool of climate finance contributors, arguing that major economies still classified as developing – including China and Saudi Arabia – should now take on a larger share of funding. Rich countries, many facing their own domestic debt and budget crises, have also pushed for the private sector to play an increasingly central role in meeting future targets.

    OECD data also shows that 36% of 2024 climate finance went to projects in Asia, making it the largest recipient region, while Africa received 31% of total contributions. In a trend that has sparked widespread criticism from developing country governments and activists, the majority of public climate finance continues to be issued as loans rather than grants: loans made up 73% of total public climate finance in 2023 and 67% in 2024. Developing nations argue that relying on loans pushes already vulnerable economies deeper into debt, at a time when they are forced to respond to a climate crisis they did little to cause.

    Mohamed Adow, director of Nairobi-based climate think tank Power Shift Africa, called the reliance on loans an outrage. “The rich world profits from the loans they provide to poor countries who are desperately trying to deal with climate change caused by the rich world. It’s a total scandal,” Adow said. “The countries least responsible for the climate crisis are being asked to take on debt to survive it.”

  • Pauline Hanson proposes Norway-style government stake in new gas ventures

    Pauline Hanson proposes Norway-style government stake in new gas ventures

    Australia’s right-wing populist party One Nation has put forward a Norway-modeled energy policy that would see the federal government take up to a 30 percent equity share in new offshore gas ventures, a proposal crafted to boost domestic production, secure public returns from natural resources and address investor concerns over policy volatility.

    Speaking at the Australia Energy Producers conference in Adelaide on Thursday, party leader Senator Pauline Hanson framed the plan as a collaborative public-private partnership that spans the full lifecycle of gas projects, from initial exploration through to production and eventual decommissioning. Hanson stressed that the framework is designed to expand gas output rather than restrict it, while deliberately protecting the position of smaller domestic Australian gas producers that might be crowded out by larger players or sweeping policy changes.

    Under the policy, the government will offer a 30 percent rebate to operators covering legitimate exploration costs in Commonwealth waters. In exchange, the Commonwealth reserves the right to claim a 30 percent equity stake in any approved production licenses that emerge from that exploration. The government will cover its proportional share of all project costs, including end-of-life decommissioning expenses, guaranteeing that environmental protection responsibilities are baked into project planning from day one and that Australian taxpayers will not be left covering unpaid cleanup costs down the line. In return for its equity contribution, the government will receive an equivalent share of project production.

    All government-held equity will be owned by two newly established public entities: a Commonwealth special investment vehicle and the Australian National Wealth Investment Corporation. Hanson said these bodies will manage the public stake to align with Australia’s national interests, with all profits generated from the equity holdings directed into a national sovereign wealth fund that will be reinvested to grow long-term public wealth. Drawing a direct comparison to Norway’s successful resource model, Hanson noted that Norway’s state-led oil and gas strategy has built a $3 trillion sovereign wealth fund that benefits all Norwegian citizens, while Australia has yet to capture similar long-term value from its own abundant natural resources.

    Hanson pushed back against claims that the policy amounts to a socialist nationalization of the gas sector, arguing instead that the framework brings much-needed predictability for international investors. She pointed out that major Australian gas export partners, including Japan and South Korea, have already started shifting their purchasing to other markets due to chronic policy instability in Australia’s energy sector, and this plan will reverse that trend by creating a clear, consistent regulatory and investment environment.

    The One Nation leader also launched sharp criticism of a competing policy proposal, pushed by independent Senator David Pocock, the Greens and the Australia Institute, that would introduce a 25 percent export tax on gas. Hanson dismissed this approach as a deliberate attempt to dismantle Australia’s gas industry to advance an extreme green ideological agenda, arguing it would damage investment, kill jobs and erode Australia’s energy security.

    In comments to reporters after her speech, Hanson shared that the policy has been in development for a long time, rooted in a close study of Norway’s successful approach to public ownership of domestic energy resources. One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce added that the plan would make every Australian a part-owner of the nation’s offshore gas resources, delivering shared benefits that extend far beyond industry profits. When asked about where the government would find the funds to cover its share of project costs, Joyce noted that savings could be reallocated from existing climate funding portfolios.

    The proposal comes amid a shifting landscape for Australian gas policy: the federal Coalition has recently pledged to fast-track approval for new gas projects, while the ruling Labor government announced earlier this month that it will introduce a mandatory gas reservation scheme requiring exporters to set aside 20 percent of their total production for the domestic market to keep domestic energy prices stable.

    Hanson also addressed apparent tensions between her national policy and the position of One Nation’s South Australian branch, which has gained significant political traction following strong results in the state’s March 2024 election and is opposing the state Labor government’s bill to lift the statewide blanket ban on hydraulic fracture stimulation, or fracking. Hanson clarified that her national plan applies exclusively to gas projects in Commonwealth offshore waters, not onshore land-based developments, so there is no conflict with the state branch’s position. She emphasized that she does not interfere in state-level policy decisions, noting that South Australian One Nation members made their own independent call on the fracking ban.

    Hanson added that she personally opposes allowing fracking in South Australia’s southeast region, where One Nation holds the seat of MacKillop, because the area is prime agricultural production land situated over a critical water table. She also predicted that Premier Peter Malinauskas’ bill to lift the fracking ban will fail to pass state parliament, noting that the legislation lacks support from the Greens, the Liberal Party and One Nation. Hanson dismissed the push to lift the ban as a cynical political stunt rather than a serious policy proposal.

  • Queensland Olympics minister Tim Mander stands aside from job amid election scandal

    Queensland Olympics minister Tim Mander stands aside from job amid election scandal

    In a sudden and high-stakes development that has shaken Queensland’s state government, Olympics Minister Tim Mander has stepped aside from his cabinet role, after the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) referred his case to the Australian Federal Police (AFP) over allegations of a potential electoral offence.

    The controversy centres on claims that Mander, a Liberal National Party politician, incorrectly enrolled to vote at a staffer’s residential address last year, despite never residing at the property for the minimum 30-day period required under Australian electoral law. Under the Commonwealth’s Criminal Code Act 1995, the alleged misrepresentation of an enrolment address qualifies as a potential criminal offence, prompting the AEC to hand the investigation over to federal law enforcement.

    Mander, who was leading preparations for the 2032 Brisbane Olympic and Paralympic Games, released a public statement late Thursday confirming his decision to stand aside. He emphasized that he had self-reported the matter and cooperated fully with inquiries, saying he is confident the investigation will clear his name and disprove accusations from the opposition Labor Party. He added that his choice to step back was driven by a desire to avoid distracting the government from its core policy and operational work.

    The allegations first emerged in reporting by *The Australian*, after which Mander faced sustained pressure and criticism from Labor rivals. Addressing the Queensland parliament on April 21, Mander explained that the enrolment confusion grew from a period of personal upheaval following a marriage separation more than a year prior. He noted that he updated the Queensland Electoral Commission with his correct permanent address once his living situation stabilized, and has always complied with the state electoral body’s requirements.

    Queensland Premier David Crisafulli was briefed on the AEC’s advice at midday Thursday, and accepted Mander’s decision to stand aside from cabinet. The 2032 Olympics and Paralympics portfolio has now been transferred to Tourism Minister Andrew Powell, who will oversee ongoing preparations for the global sporting event until the investigation concludes.

    In its official statement, the AEC confirmed that the referral relates to a potential breach of the Criminal Code Act 1995, and determined that the AFP was the appropriate body to lead the probe. An earlier version of this reporting incorrectly stated that Mander had resigned permanently, but a spokesperson for his office later clarified that he is stepping aside only temporarily while the matter is resolved.

  • Tourists in Thailand plan for coming cuts to visa-free stays

    Tourists in Thailand plan for coming cuts to visa-free stays

    Thailand’s upcoming policy to shorten maximum visa-free stays for travelers from over 90 nations is already prompting concerns among visitors scattered across the country’s most popular tourist hubs, as the government moves to crack down on foreign-linked crime. The change has upended long-held travel flexibility that long-term backpackers and casual explorers have come to rely on, adding an unexpected layer of planning to trips in one of Southeast Asia’s most visited destinations. On Bangkok’s iconic Khao San Road, a magnet for budget backpackers and nightlife lovers, the announcement this week has given travelers an extra source of stress ahead of the rule change.

    Twenty-four-year-old Irish digital engineer Alex Brady, who was waiting near Tha Tian Pier for a ferry to the world-famous Wat Arun temple, said the new 30-day cap would have drastically altered his current 5-week trip across the country. Under the current policy, in place since 2022 to revive pandemic-battered tourism, visitors from eligible countries can stay visa-free for up to 60 days. That open-ended flexibility allowed Brady and his friends to travel without a rigid itinerary, with plans to explore Bangkok, travel to the diving mecca of Koh Tao, then head north to the mountainous regions of Chiang Mai and Chiang Mai. “If you’re paying for an expensive flight ticket out here, you want to spend a good amount of time out here,” Brady explained, adding that the shorter limit would really narrow what regions and attractions travelers can fit into a single visit.

    The policy shift comes as Thailand faces growing public pressure to address a string of high-profile incidents involving foreign nationals, including drug violations, public indecency, and unlicensed business operations ranging from hotels to language schools. Tourism contributes more than 10% of Thailand’s total gross domestic product, but international visitor numbers have still not recovered to pre-pandemic levels, despite the government’s previous 60-day visa-free policy designed to boost longer stays and higher tourist spending. It remains unclear exactly how shorter visa-free stays will reduce rates of overstaying, illegal business activity or public offenses, and officials have not yet announced an official effective date for the new rules.

    Under the proposed framework, travelers will be allowed to extend their 30-day visa-free stay once for an additional 30 days, at the discretion of Thai immigration officials. Per year, visitors can also complete one “visa run” – a trip to a neighboring country to reset their visa status – that grants an extra 60 days of stay. After that period, visitors must exit Thailand again and re-enter on a different type of visa, such as a work, student, or retirement visa. For frequent visitors like Elin Ovrebo, who directs a study abroad program for a U.S. university and has brought student groups to Thailand for 28-day annual trips for more than a decade, the rule change will cut short her habit of extending her own stay by an extra week after students depart. While she says the change will likely mean giving up that post-trip extension, it will not stop her from continuing to bring groups to the country.

    The new rules are already shifting demand for visa run services, and industry operators say the impact could cut both ways. Eighty-year-old German traveler Anna Heindrich, for example, was waiting for a minibus outside a Bangkok shopping mall earlier this week to embark on a nearly 16-hour round trip to Laos just to reset her visa and extend her stay by two extra weeks. “I spoke with the agency and it sounded easy on paper. Not necessarily very comfortable, but easy,” she told AFP before departing. Tanya Chansuwan, manager of Bangkok Buddy, the visa run agency Heindrich booked with, says the new rules could grow her business as more travelers need to complete visa runs to extend their stays. Still, she acknowledges the added hassle could push some budget travelers to choose cheaper regional destinations like Vietnam instead of extending their time in Thailand. “It will be tougher for the clients, and some might choose to go somewhere else,” she noted.

  • Elon Musk’s X Corp given $750,000 penalty for eSafety breach

    Elon Musk’s X Corp given $750,000 penalty for eSafety breach

    Elon Musk’s social media giant X Corp has been ordered to pay a total of $750,000 in penalties and legal costs after being found in breach of Australian online safety regulations for failing to respond to a regulator’s inquiry into measures targeting child sexual exploitation material. The case, which stretched more than two years, has set a clear precedent for global technology companies that even large platforms cannot ignore national regulatory requirements when operating in foreign markets.

    The story dates back to early 2023, when Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant issued a mandatory transparency notice to Twitter, alongside other major social platforms, seeking detailed information on what steps each platform was taking to detect and remove illegal child sexual exploitation content from their services. Just weeks after the notice was issued, Elon Musk completed his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter and rebranded the company as X Corp, merging the original Twitter entity into the new corporate structure.

    X Corp missed the original March 29, 2023 deadline to submit a complete, adequate response to the regulator’s questions. The company only addressed the gaps identified by eSafety in a follow-up submission on May 5 of that year. When eSafety brought legal action over the missed deadline, X Corp mounted a legal challenge, arguing that the notice had been issued to the original Twitter entity which no longer existed, so the new corporation had no legal obligation to comply.

    That challenge was first rejected by Federal Court Justice Michael Wheelahan in early 2024, and the ruling was later upheld by the full bench of the Federal Court in July 2024. On Thursday, Justice Wheelahan handed down the final penalty at a hearing in Melbourne: X Corp must pay a $650,000 civil penalty for the contravention, and cover $100,000 of eSafety’s legal costs stemming from the court action.

    In his written judgment, Justice Wheelahan emphasized that Australia’s Online Safety Act, which grants eSafety the power to issue such information notices, is designed explicitly to protect Australian internet users. “The reporting requirements under the Act are an essential aspect of enforcing those expectations,” he wrote. “Accordingly, where the operator of a large social media platform has failed to comply with those reporting requirements, the public has an interest in the Commissioner seeking and obtaining a public declaration of contravention, which will contribute to a deterrent effect.”

    In a post-ruling statement, eSafety Commissioner Inman Grant said the penalty sends an unambiguous message to all technology companies that offer services to Australian users: they are bound by Australian laws, regardless of their size or ownership structure. “Meaningful transparency is critical to holding technology companies to account,” she said. “This is not only a key part of our work as Australia’s online safety regulator, it also provides the Australian public with important information about how these companies are tackling the worst-of-the-worst content on their platforms.”

    The ruling comes amid broader global momentum for stricter online child safety regulation, driven in part by News Corp Australia’s high-profile “Let Them Be Kids” campaign. The campaign spent 18 months documenting the widespread harm social media use causes to Australian children’s mental and physical health, including sharing testimonies from families who lost children to suicide linked to harmful online content. Its advocacy helped push Australia to become the first country in the world to pass legislation requiring a minimum age of 16 for social media access, a law set to go into effect in December 2025. To date, 52 other countries have announced they are considering adopting similar age restriction regulations.

  • ‘Ready for violence’: Serbian hooligans target protesters

    ‘Ready for violence’: Serbian hooligans target protesters

    For over a year, Serbia has been roiled by mass, student-led anti-government demonstrations that have grown into one of the largest political challenges to President Aleksandar Vucic’s administration since the fall of Slobodan Milosevic in 2000. What began as calls for a transparent public inquiry into the November 2024 railway station canopy collapse that killed 16 people has snowballed into a broader movement demanding early national elections – and as the protests have expanded, so too has targeted violence against movement participants.

  • Elon Musk’s X fined for not complying with Australia’s child protection laws

    Elon Musk’s X fined for not complying with Australia’s child protection laws

    A years-long legal standoff between Australian regulators and Elon Musk-owned social media giant X Corp has come to a close, with a national court upholding a substantial fine for the company’s deliberate failure to adhere to national online child safety rules.

    The dispute traces back to February 2023, when Australia’s independent online safety regulator eSafety issued a formal transparency request to Twitter, the predecessor of X. The regulator demanded internal information about the platform’s systems and practices for identifying and removing child sexual exploitation material circulating on its service. One month after the request was filed, Twitter completed its merger into X Corp, a corporate restructuring led by Musk.

    X initially refused to comply with the information order, arguing that the original legal demand was issued to Twitter — an entity that no longer existed after the merger — and that the new X Corp bore no responsibility to meet the request. For three years, the company fought the regulator’s enforcement action in Australian courts, even after an earlier ruling last year confirmed X was legally obligated to respond to the transparency notice.

    On Thursday, X reversed its position and formally admitted to the wrongdoing. Justice Michael Wheelahan of the Australian court ordered the US-based company to pay a total fine of A$610,000, adjusted up from the original 2023 penalty, plus an additional A$100,000 to cover eSafety’s legal costs. The combined penalty amounts to approximately US$463,000, with full payment due within 45 days.

    In his ruling, Justice Wheelahan explained that a penalty near the maximum allowed under Australian law was necessary given X’s size and global reach. “A penalty near the maximum is appropriate in the case of the respondent, which is a substantial corporation so that it operates as a real deterrent and is not simply a cost of doing business,” he wrote in his judgment.

    This is not the first high-profile clash between X and Australia’s eSafety regulator. The agency has previously taken on the platform over its non-compliance with Australia’s world-first ban on social media use for children under 16, and its refusal to take down graphic footage of a 2024 Sydney church stabbing that spread widely across the platform. Tensions escalated dramatically in 2024, when Musk referred to eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant as a “censorship commissar” in a post to his 196 million X followers. In the aftermath of that post, Grant revealed she received death threats, and her children’s personal information was leaked online in a doxxing attack.

    In a public statement released after Thursday’s ruling, Grant emphasized that the outcome reaffirmed the importance of holding large tech platforms accountable for child safety online. “Meaningful transparency is critical to holding technology companies to account,” she said, noting that the information request at the center of the case was designed to shed light on how platforms address the spread of harmful child sexual abuse material.

  • Laser hair removal device sparks bomb scare at Melbourne airport

    Laser hair removal device sparks bomb scare at Melbourne airport

    One of Australia’s busiest regional air travel hubs was thrown into chaos on Thursday, when two unexpected everyday items sparked a full-scale bomb alert that suspended domestic flight operations for nearly half a day. Avalon Airport, the second-busiest air gateway in the state of Victoria located 31 miles southwest of central Melbourne, was placed under partial lockdown after security screening staff flagged a suspicious piece of checked baggage just before 6 a.m. local time, which equals 8 p.m. GMT on the previous day. Emergency protocols were immediately activated, with local law enforcement and bomb disposal units dispatched to the scene to investigate the potential threat. International flight schedules remained unaffected throughout the incident, but all domestic operations were paused as a precaution, leading to widespread cancellations and delays for thousands of passengers. After a thorough examination by the bomb squad, the suspicious package was found to contain nothing more dangerous than a laser hair removal device and an insulated hot chocolate container, a far cry from the explosive device authorities had prepared for. The owner of the baggage, a Melbourne resident, was taken into custody for questioning immediately after the discovery, but was eventually released without any criminal charges, Victoria Police confirmed. According to Acting Inspector Nick Uebergang of Victoria Police, the uncooperative behavior of the baggage owner extended the duration of the security lockdown. “The person who had the bag wasn’t too cooperative with us to start off with, which made things a little bit difficult. They probably could have averted things and we could have got out of here a little bit quicker,” Uebergang told reporters. Full operations at the airport resumed approximately four hours after the initial alert was raised. In a statement following the incident, an Avalon Airport spokesperson emphasized that the rapid, by-the-book response to the potential threat highlighted the effectiveness of the facility’s security protocols. “This response demonstrates the vigilance of the screening and security processes, and precautionary measures were taken immediately to ensure the safety of passengers, staff and the broader community,” the spokesperson said. Many passengers caught up in the sudden lockdown shared their chaotic experiences with local media outlets. One traveler who arrived at the airport around 7 a.m. told ABC Radio Melbourne, “We arrived at the airport around 7am and they had just put up the closure. No one sort of knew what was going on. We knew something was fairly significant because there were a lot of police cars and other sort of cars going into the airport.” Manjeet Singh, who was scheduled to board a flight to Brisbane, said he was directed to wait in the airport carpark with no basic amenities provided during the lockdown. “There’s no arrangements, no bathroom, no toilet, no beverages, no nothing,” he told local newspaper The Age. As Victoria’s second busiest aviation hub, Avalon Airport is a key base for budget airline Jetstar, a Qantas subsidiary that operates both domestic and international services from the facility. By the time the airport reopened, two domestic services – one incoming flight from Sydney and one outgoing flight to Sydney – had already been cancelled, with multiple other domestic routes facing lengthy delays. No injuries or actual security threats were reported during the incident.

  • Storm chasers: Young guns have the chance to do something special as Melbourne look to heap more misery on Bulldogs

    Storm chasers: Young guns have the chance to do something special as Melbourne look to heap more misery on Bulldogs

    The National Rugby League (NRL) blockbuster between the Melbourne Storm and Canterbury Bulldogs on Friday night will go ahead without three key Storm players, but legendary head coach Craig Bellamy is framing the absences as a once-in-a-lifetime breakout chance for the club’s rising young talent.

    Star playmaker Cameron Munster and dynamic hooker Harry Grant, two of the Storm’s most influential All-Star core players, have been called up to State of Origin representative duty, joining lock forward Trent Loiero in stepping away from club fixtures for the representative round. In their place, Bellamy has shaken up his starting lineup to give untested youngsters their first real taste of top-flight rugby league.

    Keagan Russell-Smith will get the nod at five-eighth, slotting into the huge gap left by Munster – a player who has dominated the position at club, state, and international level for years. This will mark only Russell-Smith’s second NRL appearance, following a single outing for the Storm back in 2022, with his development slowed by repeated injury setbacks that have kept him off the pitch for extended stretches. Trent Toelau will step into the starting hooker role, while young Gabriel Satrick will make his first-grade debut off the interchange bench, where he is expected to bring an energetic running threat from dummy-half.

    While losing two of the game’s biggest superstars will undoubtedly test the Storm’s push for a third consecutive win, Bellamy says he has seen countless young prospects step up during the annual State of Origin break over his decades-long tenure, and he is confident this cohort can deliver similarly memorable performances. He urged the rookies to stick to their strengths and avoid overcomplicating their approach as they adjust to the intensity of top-level NRL.

    “We’ll certainly feel the absence of our representative players, but this is exactly the sort of opportunity these young guys have worked so hard for,” Bellamy said. “Gabe gets his first crack at first grade this weekend, Keagan has only played one game two years back, and Trent has a handful of NRL appearances under his belt. This is incredible high-level experience for them, and the biggest thing they can do is keep it simple, play the way they know how, and lean into what makes them effective.”

    Speaking specifically of Russell-Smith, who faces the unenviable task of replacing one of the sport’s best five-eighths, Bellamy highlighted the young playmaker’s natural footy smarts and defensive toughness as key assets that will help him adapt to the pressure.

    “He’s a sharp kid, a really intelligent footballer, and the thing I love most about him is how tough he is,” Bellamy said. “He’ll handle the defensive side of the game no problem. His development has been a bit slower than we initially hoped it would be, that’s all down to the injuries he’s dealt with. Fingers crossed this gives him a good, consistent run of game time now to build momentum.”

    For the Storm as a whole, Friday’s clash comes at a key turning point in the season. After a disastrous seven-game losing streak that put their finals hopes in serious jeopardy, the club has steadied its form with back-to-back wins, restoring much-needed confidence to the roster. They will face a Bulldogs side that is mired in its own slump, having dropped five consecutive matches and struggling to put points on the scoreboard in recent weeks.

    The veteran coach declined to comment on the Bulldogs’ ongoing struggles, instead choosing to focus on his own team’s resurgence and their renewed bid to secure a spot in the end-of-season finals. Bellamy noted that back-to-back wins have already made a tangible difference to the squad’s mindset after a brutal losing run.

    “When you get through a tough stretch like we did and start picking up wins again, that’s where you rebuild your confidence,” he said. “This is what these players do for their career. Aside from their families, this game is the most important thing in their lives. When you get a little bit of success like we’ve had over the past couple of weeks, you start to feel better about yourself and about the guys you’re running out onto the pitch with.”