标签: Oceania

大洋洲

  • Energy giant Woodside sees revenue jump despite production fall amid cyclone

    Energy giant Woodside sees revenue jump despite production fall amid cyclone

    Against a backdrop of escalating global geopolitical turmoil and local operational disruptions, Australia’s biggest energy producer Woodside Energy has defied market expectations to deliver a surprising uptick in revenue for the March quarter, new corporate disclosures show.

    In its mandatory filing to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) this week, Woodside reported that operating revenue for the three months ending March 31 climbed 7% quarter-over-quarter to hit US$3.26 billion (equivalent to AU$4.54 billion). The company’s average selling price for its full product portfolio — including natural gas, liquid oil, and ammonia — jumped 11% to US$63 per barrel of oil equivalent, or AU$87.67.

    This quarterly gain follows a US$3.035 billion (AU$4.22 billion) revenue result in the final quarter of 2023, though the latest figure still comes in slightly below the US$3.315 billion (AU$4.61 billion) revenue Woodside recorded in the same period a year earlier.

    The impressive price growth driven by international market shifts was partially offset by an 8% drop in overall production during the quarter, caused by severe operational shutdowns triggered by Tropical Cyclone Narelle that hit Woodside’s Western Australian upstream assets. Even with the production decline, markets reacted positively to the earnings release almost immediately: Woodside’s share price rose 1.64% in immediate after-announcement trading to settle at AU$32.93 per share.

    The price surge that boosted Woodside’s top line traces directly to escalating conflict between the United States and Iran, which disrupted traffic through the Strait of Hormuz — the narrow 50-kilometer maritime chokepoint that links the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea. Before the outbreak of recent hostilities, nearly 20% of the world’s total oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies passed through the strategic waterway. When conflict halted commercial traffic and raised widespread fears of widespread supply shortages across Asian and European markets, global crude and LNG prices spiked sharply.

    Woodside chief executive Liz Westcott framed the quarterly result as a modest but solid portfolio performance shaped directly by the market upheaval from the Middle East conflict. She noted that additional gains from current elevated spot prices will flow through to future quarterly results for the company’s LNG segment, due to the structure of its tagged contract pricing that links contract prices to delayed spot market benchmarks.

    Westcott confirmed that the Middle East conflict has not caused any disruptions to Woodside’s own global trading operations, with all the company’s scheduled shipping movements continuing to operate according to plan. She also expanded on the impact of the Western Australian cyclone, crediting the company’s emergency response team for protecting staff, physical assets, and the surrounding environment during the mandatory shutdown and subsequent restoration of production activities.

    Looking ahead, Westcott said Woodside will sharpen its focus on organizational efficiency and enhanced capital management, seeking to strike a careful balance between funding ongoing growth projects and delivering solid returns to shareholders. “Cost discipline is essential to sustained shareholder value creation,” she said. “We are commencing a structured review of our business to streamline decision making, reduce complexity and improve accountability.”

  • AI fakes of accused US press gala gunman flood social media

    AI fakes of accused US press gala gunman flood social media

    In the wake of Saturday’s assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump at Washington D.C.’s White House Correspondents’ Association gala, the digital sphere has been flooded with low-effort AI-generated forgeries falsely linking accused suspect Cole Tomas Allen to dozens of high-profile public figures, laying bare the growing threat of unregulated “AI slop” spreading across major social platforms.

    When gunfire erupted on a floor above the event’s main ballroom after the 31-year-old California native tried to sprint past security, Trump and other senior administration officials were immediately evacuated. Within hours of authorities publicly identifying Allen as the suspect, doctored AI images began circulating rapidly on Facebook, depicting the accused alongside A-list celebrities, world leaders, and media personalities, with baseless claims that he had worked for them as a driver, personal assistant, or production crew member.

    An investigative inquiry by AFP found that more than 50 public figures have been falsely tied to Allen through these forgeries. The list ranges from Hollywood stars Tom Hanks and Sydney Sweeney to chart-topping musicians Chris Brown and Taylor Swift. Even political figures including former U.S. President Barack Obama and Canadian opposition leader Pierre Poilievre, NBC News anchor Savannah Guthrie, and Pope Leo XIV have been incorrectly implicated in the fabricated posts. A separate wave of false content has also claimed Allen was employed by more than 40 professional and collegiate sports teams, with AI-generated images showing him wearing team apparel from leagues across the NFL, NHL, NBA, WNBA, and NASCAR. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, has not issued any immediate response to AFP’s request for comment on the spread of the fakes.

    Experts say most of these fake images are built from a single legitimate photograph of Allen: a picture from a December 2024 tutoring company post naming him “teacher of the month.” Unlike the early days of generative AI, which required large volumes of existing reference material of a subject to create convincing fakes, today’s tools can produce believable forgeries from just one source image.

    “Two years ago, you probably wouldn’t have been able to make those images of him, because we could only really make compelling fakes of celebrities who had a large digital footprint from which the AI systems had been trained,” explained Hany Farid, a computer science researcher at the University of California, Berkeley and chief science officer at cybersecurity firm GetReal Security. “Now, all I need is a single image of you.”

    Independent journalist Aaron Parnas, whose own likeness was incorrectly added to AI posts falsely claiming Allen worked for him, publicly pleaded on Facebook for users to report what he called “completely fake” content, warning that the spread of these forgeries is “extremely dangerous.”

    Digital literacy researcher Mike Caulfield noted that the template-driven, mass-produced nature of the fakes mirrors the clickbait output of traditional low-quality content farms, only accelerated by generative AI capabilities. “This looks a lot like the same content farm behavior, just with AI,” he told AFP.

    Recent advances in generative AI have dramatically lowered the barrier to creating convincing visual fakes, reducing common telltale errors such as distorted hands or mismatched proportions that once made forgeries easy to spot. “AI makes it trivially easy to take existing photos and change their clothes, environment, or to swap out someone else’s face,” said Jen Golbeck, a professor at the University of Maryland’s College of Information. “As soon as someone gets an idea, they can make it a visual reality.” Where manual photo editing would have allowed bad actors to create only a handful of fakes years ago, modern AI can generate hundreds of forgeries in a matter of hours, leading to the mass spread seen in the Allen case.

    This outbreak of AI disinformation is not an isolated incident: researchers have documented identical waves of fake content following other major breaking news events in recent months, including the reported U.S. capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro in January and the assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk in 2024. Experts warn that these mass-produced fakes are intentionally designed to drive viral engagement, and social media algorithms are primed to amplify them, creating significant profit for the bad actors who produce them.

    Farid cautioned that the problem is unlikely to abate as AI tools become more accessible. “Every time there’s a world event, we are just flooded with this kind of nonsense. I don’t think that’s going away,” he said. Researchers also warn that the constant flood of AI-generated disinformation risks desensitizing social media users, who may grow fatigued of constant fact-checking and ultimately become unable to distinguish verified information from harmful forgeries.

  • LIV Golf postpones New Orleans event

    LIV Golf postpones New Orleans event

    In a recent announcement made public on Tuesday, Saudi-backed LIV Golf confirmed it is delaying its planned June championship event in New Orleans, shifting the tournament to a later date in the fall. The LIV Golf Louisiana tournament was originally slated to take place from June 25 to 28 at Bayou Oaks, located within New Orleans’ City Park. The venue had already received $2 million in state-funded infrastructure upgrades specifically to accommodate the professional golf series.

    LIV Golf Louisiana representatives noted in an official statement that the decision to reschedule was made in close coordination with Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry and the state’s Economic Development department. “This shift allows us to avoid the peak summer heat and the crowded global sports calendar while ensuring the course is in the championship condition our fans and players expect,” the statement read.

    A major overlapping event factored into the scheduling call: the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which will be co-hosted by the United States, Mexico and Canada across June and July, creating a packed global sports landscape that would have drawn audience and infrastructure attention away from the golf tournament.

    “We’re grateful for the continued partnership and flexibility of the state of Louisiana as we work together to deliver a world-class debut this fall,” the statement added. “We look forward to sharing finalized dates in the near future.”

    Governor Landry confirmed that the state had already disbursed $1.2 million in incentive funding to LIV Golf as part of the hosting agreement, and the series has committed to returning the funds ahead of the rescheduled event. “We appreciate LIV’s good-faith efforts and look forward to maintaining our partnership as we continue conversations around an event later this year,” Landry said.

    The postponement comes amid growing uncertainty around LIV Golf’s long-term operations. Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, the primary backer of the breakaway golf series, recently announced it is revising its investment portfolio, leaving LIV’s future funding unclear as organizers actively seek new outside investors.

    For the 2025 season, LIV Golf’s next scheduled event – and the only tournament set to take place in the United States before August – will run from May 7 to 10 at Trump National Golf Club in the Washington D.C. suburbs.

  • ‘Nightmare situation’: Rebel Wilson denies making up narrative to divide young actor and producer after alleged complaint, defamation trial told

    ‘Nightmare situation’: Rebel Wilson denies making up narrative to divide young actor and producer after alleged complaint, defamation trial told

    Hollywood star Rebel Wilson has pushed back against allegations that she manufactured a false sexual harassment narrative to create conflict, describing the ongoing defamation lawsuit against her as an unforeseen ‘nightmare situation’ that derailed preparations for her first directorial project. The Pitch Perfect and Bridesmaids actor took the witness stand for a second consecutive day on Wednesday at Sydney’s Federal Court, where she is being sued by Charlotte MacInnes, a co-star in Wilson’s upcoming coming-of-age female-led comedy *The Deb*.

    At the heart of the legal dispute are a series of social media posts Wilson published that MacInnes argues falsely implied the young performer had initially made a sexual harassment complaint against the film’s producer, Lauren Ghost, then withdrew the claim to advance her career. The incident in question centers on a September 2023 shared bath at Ghost’s Bondi penthouse, where both Ghost and MacInnes wore swimsuits while warming up after Ghost experienced a medical episode during a sunset swim at Bondi Beach. MacInnes has repeatedly denied ever making any formal or informal sexual harassment complaint connected to the incident.

    During cross-examination from MacInnes’ barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC, Wilson was accused of creating the chaotic ‘nightmare situation’ through a sequence of deliberate lies, just five weeks before *The Deb* was scheduled to begin principal photography. The actor forcefully rejected this characterization, calling the claim completely nonsensical. She told the court that when she was first allegedly told about the incident, it came as a devastating shock that dropped into her lap at the worst possible moment.

    As a first-time director who spent years developing *The Deb* as a project rooted in female empowerment, Wilson stated it would never have served her own interests to invent a sexual harassment allegation involving two key production team and cast members. She told the court: ‘This is an absolute nightmare situation for me, who’s a first time director, making a movie that is essentially a girl power movie. It would not at all be in my interest to make up a sexual harassment complaint between those two very important people.’

    Wilson also pushed back against claims that she mistreated female cast and crew during the production of the film, reaffirming that she has long viewed herself as a champion for women in the entertainment industry. Entering the Sydney courthouse Wednesday morning, the actor publicly thanked the cast and crew of *The Deb* for their ongoing support throughout the legal process, noting that she could not discuss the details of the ongoing trial out of respect for the Australian legal system. The blockbuster defamation trial is ongoing, with further testimony and developments expected in the coming days.

  • Ex-FBI chief Comey charged with threatening Trump’s life in Instagram post

    Ex-FBI chief Comey charged with threatening Trump’s life in Instagram post

    On Tuesday, U.S. law enforcement officials announced a new criminal indictment against former FBI Director James Comey, who is now facing accusations of willfully threatening the life of sitting President Donald Trump. This legal action marks the second time Comey has been charged in recent months, coming five months after a separate federal case against him was thrown out by a judge on procedural grounds.

    The current charges stem from an Instagram post Comey shared in May last year, where he published an image of seashells arranged to spell out the numbers “86 47”. In comments on the post at the time, Trump, who claims to be the 47th U.S. president, argued that “86” is widely recognized slang for assassinate or kill, framing the image as a deliberate threat against his life. The grand jury indictment returned by a North Carolina jury echoes this framing, stating that the numerical sequence constituted a “serious expression of an intent to harm the President of the United States.”

    Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former personal lawyer to the president who was appointed to the role earlier this month following the ousting of previous Attorney General Pam Bondi, detailed the charges Tuesday. Comey faces two counts: one count of willful threat against the president’s life and bodily integrity, and a second count of transmitting an interstate threat. Each offense carries a maximum statutory penalty of 10 years in federal prison.

    “I think it’s fair to say that threatening the life of anybody is dangerous and potentially a crime,” Blanche said in a statement following the indictment. “Threatening the life of the president of the United States will never be tolerated by the Department of Justice.” Blanche pushed back against claims of political motivation, noting that while many of the current department investigations target people the president has clashed with, pursuing such cases is a legitimate presidential duty.

    Comey has long pushed back on the accusation, issuing an apology immediately after sharing the post. He claimed that he was unaware of the violent association some groups attach to the number 86, and that he opposes all forms of political violence. He removed the post from his Instagram account hours after it was published, he has confirmed.

    This indictment arrives against a tense backdrop of escalating political violence: just three days prior, authorities arrested a suspect accused of attempting to assassinate Trump at a Washington D.C. dinner hosted by the White House Correspondents’ Association. It also coincides with a court ruling that allows Comey’s daughter, former federal prosecutor Maurene Comey, to move forward with a wrongful termination lawsuit claiming she was fired from her role for political reasons related to her father’s conflicts with Trump.

    The first case against Comey, brought in September, charged him with making false statements to Congress and obstructing a congressional investigation. Critics widely characterized that prosecution as political retribution by Trump against a high-profile political opponent. In November, a federal judge dismissed the entire case, ruling that the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney who brought the charges had been unlawfully appointed to the role. That same ruling also threw out a separate case against another top Trump critic, New York Attorney General Letitia James. Another former Trump administration official and outspoken critic, ex-national security advisor John Bolton, has also been indicted in recent months on charges related to alleged mishandling of classified information.

    Democratic lawmakers have been quick to denounce the new indictment, framing it as another example of the president weaponizing the Department of Justice to target political opponents. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin called the charges “baseless” and dismissed the action as “petty retribution.” “This is another case of a weaponized Justice Department lashing out on behalf of a vengeful president,” Durbin said in an official statement.

    Comey’s long-running conflict with Trump dates back to 2017, when Trump fired Comey from his role as FBI director amid the agency’s investigation into alleged collusion between the 2016 Trump presidential campaign and Russian government actors seeking to influence the election outcome. Comey was originally appointed to lead the FBI by former Democratic President Barack Obama in 2013.

    The September charges against Comey came just days after Trump publicly pressured then-Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue legal action against Comey and other perceived political opponents, a break from longstanding norms that bar White House interference in Justice Department casework. Bondi was fired from her post earlier this month, with multiple reports indicating that her failure to secure indictments against Trump’s political critics was a key factor in her dismissal.

    Since taking office for his second term, Trump has implemented a series of punitive measures against individuals and institutions he views as disloyal or hostile. These actions have included purging dissident government officials, targeting law firms that have represented opponents in legal cases against him, and pulling federal research and education funding from universities that have drawn his criticism.

  • PSG edge Bayern in nine-goal Champions League semi-final epic

    PSG edge Bayern in nine-goal Champions League semi-final epic

    Paris Saint-Germain and Bayern Munich delivered one of the most dramatic matches in UEFA Champions League history on Tuesday, producing a nine-goal epic in the first leg of their 2025 semi-final encounter that will go down as an instant classic of the competition. The 5-4 victory for PSG at a packed Parc des Princes stands as the highest-scoring semi-final match in the history of the tournament, with two of European football’s current heavyweights showcasing relentless attacking quality from the first whistle to the last.

    The first half alone delivered enough drama to fill an entire fixture, with Bayern Munich drawing first blood in the 17th minute. After PSG defender Willian Pacho brought down Bayern winger Luis Diaz inside the box, England captain Harry Kane stepped up to convert the penalty, notching his 54th goal of an already historic individual season. The German champions, who had beaten PSG 2-1 in the Champions League league phase back in November via a Diaz brace, looked the more dangerous side in the opening exchanges, but their aggressive, front-footed attacking approach left gaps at the back that PSG were quick to exploit on the counter.

    Just after the 30-minute mark, Georgian winger Khvicha Kvaratskhelia – widely regarded as the standout player of this season’s Champions League – broke the deadlock for the hosts. He outpaced Josip Stanisic down the left flank, cut inside the recovering defender, and fired a precision shot into the far corner to level the score at 1-1. Three minutes later, Joao Neves nodded home a well-placed Ousmane Dembele corner to put PSG 2-1 ahead, sending the packed home crowd into a frenzy.

    The end-to-end action showed no signs of slowing, however. Bayern’s Michael Olise drove into the PSG penalty area and smashed a powerful effort past the goalkeeper to restore parity at 2-2, marking his 20th goal of the 2024-2025 campaign. In first-half stoppage time, PSG were awarded a penalty after a cross from Dembele struck the arm of Alphonso Davies, who was making his first Champions League start of the season following a long-term injury layoff. After a lengthy VAR check, Swiss referee confirmed the decision, and Dembele converted to put PSG 3-2 up going into the halftime break.

    Two minutes into the second half, PSG extended their lead further. Achraf Hakimi delivered a pinpoint low cross into the path of Kvaratskhelia, who slotted home his second of the night to make it 4-2 – his seventh goal in seven knockout stage games this campaign, further cementing his reputation as PSG’s biggest match-winner this season. Before Bayern could reorganize, Dembele caught Manuel Neuer off guard with a low shot that bounced into the net off the near post, putting the French champions 5-2 up and seemingly out of reach with just over half an hour remaining.

    Yet Vincent Kompany’s Bayern side refused to fold, even with their manager watching from the stands due to a suspension. The German champions pulled one back through Dayot Upamecano, who headed home a Joshua Kimmich free kick to cut the deficit to 5-3, taking Bayern’s total goal tally for the season to 170. Minutes later, Diaz latched onto a long through ball, dribbled past PSG captain Marquinhos, and slotted the ball past the goalkeeper to make the score 5-4, setting up a nervy final 15 minutes for the hosts. PSG came close to extending their lead late on when Senny Mayulu’s strike hit the crossbar with Neuer beaten, leaving the final scoreline locked at 5-4.

    The result leaves Luis Enrique’s PSG holding a narrow one-goal advantage heading into the return leg next Wednesday at Bayern’s Allianz Arena, with a place in the May 30 Champions League final in Budapest up for grabs. PSG are chasing history as they aim to become only the second club in the modern Champions League era to retain the trophy, having lifted the title in 2024 with a 5-0 win over Inter Munich in Munich’s final venue. For Bayern, who lifted their sixth Champions League trophy in 2020 with a final win over PSG, the club is aiming to reach its first final since that 2020 triumph, and will be confident of turning around the deficit in front of their home fans. Widely praised as already surpassing last season’s iconic semi-final between Inter Milan and Barcelona, the nine-goal thriller has left the tie perfectly poised for another dramatic encounter in Munich next week.

  • King Charles backs AUKUS defence pact in address to US Congress

    King Charles backs AUKUS defence pact in address to US Congress

    In a landmark address to the United States Congress — the first by a British monarch in more than 30 years — King Charles III has publicly thrown his support behind the trilateral AUKUS security partnership, framing the ambitious $368 billion submarine initiative as a cornerstone of collective long-term security for the three allied nations.

    The rare joint address to American lawmakers saw the monarch highlight deep existing defense cooperation between the United Kingdom and the United States, noting that thousands of service members and their families from each country are stationed across the other’s territory. Beyond the joint production of F-35 fighter jets, King Charles centered his remarks on AUKUS, the security pact between the UK, US and Australia that he called “the most ambitious submarine program in history.”

    As the reigning sovereign of Australia, the King emphasized personal pride in the partnership, stressing that the collaboration is not rooted in mere sentiment. “We do not embark on these remarkable endeavours together out of sentiment,” he told the assembled legislators. “We do so because they build greater shared resilience for the future, so making our citizens safer for generations to come.”

    King Charles’ endorsement of the pact comes just one day after a British parliamentary inquiry released a critical assessment warning that the ambitious $368 billion program faces significant risk due to a lack of consistent, high-profile political leadership. The inquiry’s report called on new UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer to step into a more public, active role in advancing the initiative, warning that ongoing political drift could ultimately derail the project.

    But top Australian officials have moved quickly to push back on these concerns, reaffirming that AUKUS remains on track and enjoys unified support across all three partner nations. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told reporters in Canberra this week that overwhelming backing for the pact exists from Starmer’s British government and UK defense leadership alike. Echoing a phrase used by former US President Donald Trump, Albanese declared: “AUKUS is … full steam ahead. And I’m very confident that it will be so.”

    Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles echoed this confidence, noting that recurring bipartisan and cross-national scrutiny of the initiative is a healthy, normal part of the process. Marles pointed out that the UK parliamentary review was ultimately broadly supportive of AUKUS, and emphasized that strong support for the program holds across all three member states. “That the program is put under constant scrutiny again in all three countries is an important thing to happen as well, and this is a part of that,” Marles told Sky News. He added that Australian officials are fully comfortable with the program’s current trajectory, and expect the UK government will act on the inquiry’s recommendations to keep the initiative moving forward.

    Under the terms of the AUKUS agreement, Australia will acquire three nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines from the United States, with an option to acquire two additional modified boats if needed, as part of a broader plan to build up Western Indo-Pacific defense capabilities.

  • Germany holds breath as stranded whale ‘Timmy’ sets off in barge

    Germany holds breath as stranded whale ‘Timmy’ sets off in barge

    For weeks, a lost humpback whale’s fight for survival has held the entire nation of Germany in suspense. On Tuesday evening, that saga took a pivotal turn: the 20-ton marine mammal, dubbed Timmy by local media, was successfully guided into a converted cargo barge fitted with a water-filled hold, and the vessel departed for the North Sea to carry out what many call a last-ditch effort to return the animal to its natural habitat.

    Timmy’s ordeal began in late March, when the young humpback – which normally makes its home in the cold, nutrient-rich waters of the Atlantic Ocean – strayed hundreds of kilometers off course and became stuck on a sandbank off the Baltic coast near the northern German city of Luebeck. After the whale freed itself only to become re-trapped multiple times, rescue teams attempted a series of interventions, from digging artificial escape channels to using inflatable flotation devices, but every attempt ended in failure. By early April, state officials formally abandoned rescue efforts, concluding that Timmy could not be saved.

    That decision sparked immediate public outcry, pushing authorities to reverse course and approve a new privately funded rescue plan put forward by two German entrepreneurs. The proposal, which involves transporting Timmy via barge to the North Sea for release if the animal remains strong enough, was dismissed by many marine experts as a long shot, with critics arguing that the stress of capture and transport would only worsen the whale’s condition and reduce any chance of survival.

    Despite the skepticism, rescuers pulled off a breakthrough earlier on Tuesday. Teams fitted stabilizing straps around the 13-meter whale, then guided it down a specially dug sand channel toward the waiting barge. With rescue divers swimming alongside, Timmy picked up speed and voluntarily swam into the water-filled hold, drawing cheers from on-site teams and spectators watching live streams and shore-side broadcasts.

    “I can’t even put my happiness into words,” Karin Walter-Mommert, one of the entrepreneurs backing the mission, told German tabloid Bild. “You could see that the whale was fighting, that he wanted to live. Knowing he’s now safely in the barge is simply wonderful – it proves the fight for Timmy was worth every effort.”

    The operation received official approval after government vets confirmed the whale was healthy enough to withstand the journey north to the North Sea, his intended release site. A temporary green net barrier has been fitted across the barge’s entrance to keep Timmy contained during the voyage. Till Backhaus, environment minister for the state of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania where the stranding occurred, praised the round-the-clock work of rescue teams, saying “In the end, we have saved this animal.”

    Backhaus has defended the controversial mission against criticism from the scientific community. “I’ve always said: those who do nothing make no mistakes,” he told reporters Tuesday. “If the scientists who claimed this was all pointless had seen the young whale just now, how he swam into the barge all on his own, they would understand.” In a written statement responding to critics who accused officials of sidelining scientific input, Backhaus countered that authorities had always based their decisions on available evidence: “No one could tell us with certainty that the whale would die, or when. On the basis of these uncertain conclusions, we decided to allow the rescue attempt to go forward.”

    The weeks-long saga of Timmy the stranded whale has dominated German media, with rolling coverage on national television, constant updates from online news outlets, and widespread discussion across social media platforms. But the high-profile rescue has also sparked fierce public debate, angry exchanges between supporters and critics of the operation, and even the spread of unfounded conspiracy theories about the whale’s stranding and the rescue’s motives. As the barge carrying Timmy makes its way toward the North Sea, the entire country continues to hold its breath, waiting to see if the high-risk effort will end with the young whale swimming free.

  • Musk faces off with OpenAI in court over broken promises

    Musk faces off with OpenAI in court over broken promises

    A high-stakes legal battle that could reshape the future of the global artificial intelligence industry kicked off Tuesday in a California federal court, where Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk went head-to-head with OpenAI leader Sam Altman over allegations of broken founding promises. The Oakland trial, held just across the San Francisco Bay from OpenAI’s headquarters, is already being framed by industry observers as more than a corporate dispute: it is a fundamental clash over who gets to control the rapidly advancing AI sector, and for what ultimate purpose. Opening statements began Tuesday morning, with Musk’s legal team taking the podium first to lay out the tech billionaire’s case against OpenAI and its major backer Microsoft. Lead attorney Steven Molo told the nine-seat jury that the defendants “stole a charity” from its original mission of open, altruistic AI development for the public good. Molo acknowledged Musk’s polarizing public standing, telling jurors “He is a legend, like him or dislike him.” The jury selection process, completed Monday, laid bare the deep divide in American public opinion toward Musk: while the entrepreneur is celebrated globally for revolutionizing electric vehicles and commercial space travel, his sharp shift to conservative politics and public alliance with former President Donald Trump has alienated large swathes of the public. Just ahead of opening remarks, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a rare public directive to both Musk and Altman: the two rivals would need to limit inflammatory social media posts for the duration of the trial. The order came after Musk unleashed a barrage of critical posts on X — the social platform he owns — on Monday, derisively referring to Altman as “Scam Altman.” What began as a professional partnership between the two men has curdled into open enmity, with Altman now widely regarded as Musk’s most high-profile nemesis in the global AI race. The roots of the feud stretch back to OpenAI’s founding in 2015, when Altman recruited Musk to join as a co-founder. At the time, the organization was billed as a non-profit research laboratory, with a stated mission to develop AI technology that “would belong to the world.” Musk put at least $38 million into the venture in its early days, but the pair split acrimoniously in 2018. One year later, the OpenAI Foundation launched a for-profit commercial subsidiary, and tech giant Microsoft stepped in with a series of large investments that have now grown to a total commitment of $13 billion. Today, Microsoft’s stake in OpenAI is valued at roughly $135 billion, and the company has become a commercial juggernaut worth $80 billion on paper, riding the unprecedented global success of its ChatGPT chatbot, which launched in 2022 and changed the public perception of AI overnight. OpenAI is now preparing for a high-profile initial public offering, though its unusual governance structure — which leaves ultimate control in the hands of a non-profit board, rather than commercial shareholders — has long made investors nervous. After exiting OpenAI, Musk launched his own rival AI research firm, xAI, which he merged into SpaceX in February of this year. SpaceX is currently valued at $1.25 trillion, and its own upcoming IPO, expected to launch in June, is projected to become the largest in U.S. history. In his lawsuit, Musk argues he was deliberately deceived about OpenAI’s commitment to its original non-profit, altruistic mission. Outside the courthouse Monday, OpenAI’s legal team pushed back against the claims, with attorney William Savitt saying co-founders Altman and Greg Brockman “are confident in their position and look forward to the facts being known.” In official court filings, OpenAI has countered that the 2018 split was caused by Musk’s own desire to seize total control of the organization, not any shift away from non-profit principles. The company has dismissed Musk’s lawsuit outright in public posts, calling it “nothing more than a harassment campaign that’s driven by ego, jealousy and a desire to slow down a competitor.” The trial will wrap up with a decision from Judge Gonzalez Rogers by late May, with the jury providing an advisory finding to guide her ruling. Musk’s legal team is asking the court to force OpenAI to reverse its transition to a hybrid commercial structure and return to being a pure non-profit, as well as remove Altman and OpenAI president Greg Brockman from their leadership roles. Though Musk initially sought up to $134 billion in damages, he has since said he would not keep any award, pledging to redirect any monetary settlement to the original OpenAI non-profit foundation. The outcome of the case could force OpenAI to fundamentally restructure its business model, sending ripples through the entire fast-growing global AI industry.

  • Hungary’s PM-elect Magyar offers to meet Ukraine’s Zelensky in June

    Hungary’s PM-elect Magyar offers to meet Ukraine’s Zelensky in June

    Fresh off his landmark election victory that ousted 16-year incumbent nationalist leader Viktor Orbán, Hungary’s incoming prime minister Peter Magyar has extended an formal proposal to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in early June, in a bid to reset fractious bilateral ties between the two neighboring nations. In a public Facebook announcement made following a meeting with the mayor of the Ukrainian city of Berehove in Budapest, Magyar outlined his plan to host the talks in Berehove, a western Ukrainian city where ethnic Hungarians make up the majority of the population.

    Tensions between Hungary and Ukraine have simmered for more than a decade, hitting a new low in the months leading up to Hungary’s April 12 general election. At the core of the long-running dispute are questions over the rights of the sizeable ethnic Hungarian community based in Ukraine’s western Transcarpathia region, an area that was part of the Kingdom of Hungary until the conclusion of World War I.

    The diplomatic rift first emerged in 2017, when Kyiv passed legislation requiring Ukrainian to be the primary language of instruction in secondary education. Hungarian officials have argued for years that this policy disenfranchises the estimated tens of thousands of ethnic Hungarians who call Transcarpathia home. During Orbán’s final term in office, tensions escalated dramatically: the former nationalist prime minister repeatedly leveraged Hungary’s European Union veto power to block Brussels’ planned financial aid packages for Kyiv and new sanctions against Russia over its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Magyar framed the proposed meeting as an opportunity to address both the long-standing ethnic rights dispute and launch a new era of cooperation between the two countries. “The purpose of the meeting is to help improve the situation of Hungarians in Transcarpathia and enable them to remain in their homeland,” he wrote. Magyar called on Ukraine to roll back the restrictive language rules that have been in place for more than 10 years, saying that the ethnic Hungarian community in Transcarpathia deserves full restoration of their cultural, linguistic, administrative, and higher education rights to guarantee their status as equal and respected citizens of Ukraine.

    “If we can resolve these issues, we can certainly open a new chapter in Ukrainian-Hungarian bilateral relations,” Magyar added. The proposed meeting, if it goes forward, would mark a major shift in Hungary’s approach to Ukraine after 16 years of Orbán’s Euroskeptic, Russia-friendly leadership that repeatedly frustrated Western efforts to present a unified front against Moscow’s invasion.