标签: Oceania

大洋洲

  • Plug pulled on plans for $134K statue of former Victorian premier Dan Andrews

    Plug pulled on plans for $134K statue of former Victorian premier Dan Andrews

    Victoria’s newly sworn-in premier Ben Carroll has scrapped a longstanding automatic policy that granted taxpayer-funded bronze statues to long-serving state premiers, scrapping a planned $134,000 monument for his predecessor Daniel Andrews in the process.

    Andrews, who led Victoria for 3219 days – just over eight years – crossed the 3000-day threshold that has guaranteed a public statue under existing rules. But just weeks after taking over the top job from Jacinta Allan, Carroll has put an immediate end to the policy, arguing it no longer aligns with what Victorian communities expect from public spending.

    “Gratitude does not require a taxpayer-funded statue,” Carroll told reporters Wednesday, confirming the Andrews statue project has been formally taken off the table. “I respect your money. That means, being careful and deliberate about how government spends it.”

    The decision comes as Victoria grapples with deepening fiscal pressure, with official projections showing the state’s gross debt is on track to hit nearly $200 billion by the 2029-30 financial year. Carroll already tabled a sweeping package of public spending cuts in his first weeks in office, ranging from pausing work on a slate of major infrastructure projects to smaller, high-profile cuts including ending taxpayer-funded office plant rentals and discontinuing production of branded government merchandise like stubby holders and t-shirts.

    Alongside scrapping the automatic statue rule, Carroll announced an independent public review to overhaul the state’s protocols for commemorating long-serving public officials, including reassessing the criteria for granting official state funerals. The review will examine what forms of commemoration are appropriate, how much public money should be allocated to these events, and whether automatic entitlements remain justifiable.

    Carroll noted that the rarity of state funerals is central to their significance as public tributes, signaling that future state funerals may be granted only in exceptional circumstances rather than as an automatic entitlement. The review is expected to deliver a set of recommendations to government in the coming months, which will inform formal policy changes to Victoria’s public commemoration framework.

    Supporters of the change argue that prioritizing fiscal restraint during a period of growing state debt makes the end of the automatic statue rule a necessary and popular step, while critics have pushed back that denying formal commemoration to premiers who dedicate decades of service to the state undermines the recognition of their contributions to public life.

  • Trump announces deal for huge US stake in Venezuelan oil reserves

    Trump announces deal for huge US stake in Venezuelan oil reserves

    In a surprise announcement made public Friday, former and current President Donald Trump revealed that his administration has finalized a historic energy agreement with Venezuela’s interim government that secures majority U.S. ownership of 65 billion barrels of the country’s proven oil reserves. Trump hailed the agreement as unparalleled in global energy history, saying it would dramatically expand America’s domestic-held petroleum reserves and deliver much-needed relief to U.S. consumers facing elevated fuel prices.

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that the arrangement is set to unlock nearly $100 billion in private sector investment into Venezuela’s struggling oil sector, a move the top diplomat framed as a win for both nations. The breakthrough comes less than five months after the Trump administration oversaw the ousting and capture of long-time Venezuelan ruler Nicolas Maduro in January, after years of escalating diplomatic and economic pressure on his socialist government. Following Maduro’s removal, the U.S. allowed Maduro’s former vice president Delcy Rodriguez to remain in place as interim head of government on the condition that she align her policy agenda with Washington’s priorities.

    Trump has long positioned securing Venezuelan oil reserves as a core foreign policy goal, and in a post on his Truth Social platform, he emphasized that the agreement will more than double the volume of proven oil reserves under U.S. control. He credited Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth with negotiating the arrangement with Rodriguez’s administration, noting that the deal was structured as a public-private partnership with U.S. private energy firms. “This Transaction will greatly strengthen the already growing relationship between Venezuela and the United States!” Trump wrote in his post.

    Rubio echoed that framing in a post on X, arguing that the deal delivers on the Trump administration’s core “America First” foreign policy agenda. “President Trump’s bold foreign policy is driving America First wins: securing stable reserves and low-cost oil in our Hemisphere and lowering gas prices here at home,” Rubio wrote, adding that for Venezuelan citizens, the near-$100 billion in private investment will support thousands of high-wage jobs and lay the groundwork for widespread economic reconstruction after decades of mismanagement under the Maduro regime. No additional details on the terms of the agreement, including timeline for development or revenue sharing arrangements, have been released publicly.

    As of Friday afternoon, there has been no official confirmation of the agreement from Rodriguez’s interim government in Caracas. Prior to Trump’s announcement, U.S. news outlet Axios published a report Thursday citing two unnamed senior U.S. officials that the two countries had been in advanced negotiations over a dozen producing oil fields holding a combined 90 billion barrels of proven reserves – roughly one-third of Venezuela’s total 300 billion barrel proven reserve base, the largest in the world. According to Axios’ reporting, in exchange for U.S. private and public entities taking an ownership stake in the fields, American and international private energy firms will lead infrastructure upgrades and development of the reserves, with a larger share of gross oil revenue returned to Venezuela’s government than under previous arrangements.

    The report also noted that the deal comes at a critical moment for U.S. energy security: America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve currently sits at its lowest level in 40 years, and the agreement would allow the U.S. to more than double its total domestically controlled proven reserves.

    For the Trump administration, the deal also addresses a pressing political vulnerability: the president has faced sliding approval ratings ahead of November’s midterm elections, driven in part by elevated global oil prices that have pushed up U.S. gasoline costs. The price spikes followed Trump’s decision to launch a military campaign against Iran that disrupted global oil supply chains, and Trump has explicitly tied the new Venezuelan deal to lower pump prices for American consumers.

    While the Trump administration has spent months urging U.S. energy companies to expand operations in Venezuela, many firms have remained cautious about committing large-scale capital to the country. Venezuela’s oil infrastructure has fallen into severe disrepair after decades of underinvestment and mismanagement, and previous Venezuelan governments led by Maduro and his predecessor Hugo Chavez expropriated billions of dollars in foreign-owned energy assets, leaving many investors wary of future political risk.

    Chevron, the only major U.S. oil company that maintained operations in Venezuela through the end of the Maduro regime, announced in July that it had already lifted its daily crude production in the country to 280,000 barrels, with plans to increase output by an additional 50% by the end of 2028.

  • Driven by distraction? Trump steps up stunts as US midterms loom

    Driven by distraction? Trump steps up stunts as US midterms loom

    As the high-stakes November 2025 US midterm elections approach, President Donald Trump has sharply escalated a familiar political playbook: rolling out headline-grabbing stunts to redirect public attention away from issues weighing on his approval ratings and toward his preferred political narrative. The 80-year-old former reality television star, who has long relied on the tactic of shifting conversations when headlines turn unfavorable, is now targeting his diversions with unusual precision to drown out coverage of the ongoing Iran conflict and economic anxiety hitting American households.

    “This president specializes in diversions,” William Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, told Agence France-Presse. After six months of open conflict, the Iran war has emerged as a major drag on Trump’s approval numbers, with independent polling consistently placing his support in the low 30s. With no clear end to the conflict in sight, The Atlantic has reported that the White House’s core strategy is to push the war out of public consciousness: avoiding large new military deployments and instead focusing on low-profile economic sanctions against Tehran, while creating new newsworthy moments to draw the press and voters elsewhere.

    The most striking of these diversions came last Thursday, when Trump summoned reporters to the Oval Office to make an unprecedented announcement: he had signed an executive order to rename Lake Ontario—the shared transboundary water body between the United States and Canada—”Lake America.” The provocative move comes on the heels of a days-long, headline-dominating trade dispute with Ottawa, and fits neatly into the “America First” messaging that Trump has centered for his core political base.

    Democrats across the Capitol were quick to condemn the action as a juvenile, transparent bid to distract from pressing national issues. “It’s a pathetic attempt at distraction, and it’s working families who are paying the price,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a formal statement following the announcement.

    The Lake Ontario renaming is far from an isolated incident. Just a week earlier, Trump unexpectedly revived discussions of potential new talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un—a topic he had not addressed publicly since his second inauguration in January 2025. He heaped praise on Kim, whom he met three times during his first term, while criticizing US long-time ally South Korea and announcing further cuts to joint military exercises with Seoul. He has also leaned into more personal, viral-friendly topics, sharing frequent updates on his planned renovations to the White House on his Truth Social platform—most recently posting about “cleaning and regrouting the Granite” at the building’s main entrance, a move Democrats argue highlights how out of touch he is with everyday voter concerns.

    Beyond diverting attention from problematic issues, Trump’s stunts also serve a second goal: keeping all political focus centered on himself ahead of the midterms. After his hand-picked endorses won a string of key Republican primaries, the two-term president has publicly argued he is the GOP’s biggest asset in the upcoming vote. “Pretend I’m on the ballot,” he told Fox News in a recent interview. Drawing from a $400 million campaign war chest, Trump is also set to roll out a national television ad campaign touting his own presidential record, as many within the party fear Republicans could lose their narrow control of both chambers of Congress.

    The White House has also amplified a curated list of administration wins this week, highlighting 14 policy achievements ranging from new restrictions on mail-in voting to expanded migrant deportations to energize the base.

    Even with these aggressive tactics, Trump faces significant barriers to shifting the national conversation to his preferred ground. The Iran conflict remains a persistent political quagmire for a president who campaigned on keeping the United States out of costly new foreign wars. If global oil prices remain elevated, driving up overall cost of living for households, economic issues will likely remain the top priority for voters regardless of viral stunts. “It’s hard to change people’s minds when you’re talking about things they’re experiencing directly,” Galston noted.

    The White House has also recently lost one of its most effective communications leaders, after popular Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stepped down to spend more time with her children, leaving a gap in the administration’s ability to message around key issues. After the midterms, Trump is also set to enter the lame-duck phase of his presidency, which could dim his political star unless he finds new ways to stay in the national spotlight.

    One potential path to remaining center stage is building suspense around his 2028 political plans. Trump has already dropped repeated hints that he could run for a third presidential term—a move barred by the 22nd Amendment to the US Constitution, but political observers have long learned that betting against Trump’s willingness to challenge established norms is rarely a safe wager.

  • The chaotic saga of Kanye West’s planned Russian concerts

    The chaotic saga of Kanye West’s planned Russian concerts

    The planned pair of concerts by American rap icon Kanye West, who performs under the stage name Ye, in Russia has devolved into a chaotic public saga marked by venue withdrawals, internal government division, and widespread public confusion, leaving the future of the shows completely up in the air.

    West, who has been banned from performing in multiple European countries over a history of virulent antisemitic statements and public praise for Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, would be the most high-profile Western musician to perform in Russia since Moscow launched its full-scale military invasion of Ukraine in 2022. For factions within the Russian government, the concerts have emerged as a potential opportunity to push back against widespread narratives that Russia has become culturally and politically isolated in the wake of the war, leading some officials to openly support the shows moving forward.

    However, the controversy surrounding West’s past statements has sparked fierce pushback from other political leaders, particularly given the history of Nazi Germany’s brutal siege of Saint Petersburg—originally scheduled as the host city for the October 10 and 11 shows. Initially, the events were advertised by Moscow-based promoter Say Agency as taking place at Saint Petersburg’s Gazprom Arena, which even shared promotional posts for the concerts on its official Telegram channel. Just one week after the announcement, however, the stadium backed out entirely, issuing a statement that it had “not signed any contracts to lease the stadium for the event,” leaving both promoters and ticket buyers shocked.

    Ticket sales for the shows saw extraordinary early demand: entry-level tickets priced between roughly $100 sold out within hours of going on sale, with premium tickets reaching as high as nearly $2,000. Russian state media reports that more than 100,000 tickets have already been sold, and the venue’s withdrawal sparked immediate anger from fans who had already purchased entry, with many demanding immediate refunds on social media. “Give the people their money back, you clowns,” one user commented on Gazprom Arena’s official Telegram post announcing the withdrawal.

    Promoter Say Agency has pushed back against claims that the concerts are fully cancelled, saying only that it is actively working to find an alternative venue and asking fans to wait for an official update. Local Saint Petersburg outlet Fontanka reports that the decision to pull the venue booking did not originate with the stadium itself, but came from senior federal officials in Moscow, with the outlet citing anonymous sources saying “the concert had not been approved by all the necessary authorities” before being called off via a single high-level phone call.

    Outlets including business news outlet RBK have confirmed that intense debates over whether West should be allowed to perform are ongoing within the Kremlin and Russia’s presidential administration. The fault lines of these debates reportedly fall along generational lines: younger political and media officials, including leadership at Gazprom Media, are said to support allowing the concerts to proceed, while older, more established officials remain deeply skeptical.

    The controversy around West’s past statements runs particularly deep in Russia. The rapper has openly expressed admiration for Hitler on multiple occasions, infamously declaring his “love” for the Nazi leader during a 2022 interview with far-right broadcaster Alex Jones. While West issued a public apology for his past antisemitic comments in 2023 and published a full-page advertisement in The Wall Street Journal in January 2024 attributing his past harmful remarks to his bipolar disorder diagnosis, many Russian public figures remain opposed to his appearance.

    Among the critics is Ekaterina Mizulina, head of Russia’s influential internet safety watchdog, who has pointed out that Saint Petersburg suffered a devastating 900-day siege by Nazi forces during World War II that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians, calling West an “admirer of Adolf Hitler” in her criticism of the planned shows. Even some political figures who have opposed banning West have condemned his past actions: lawmaker Vitaly Milonov, best known as the architect of Russia’s controversial LGBTQ propaganda restrictions, called West’s past statements “vile, obscene things” but argued against barring him from performing.

    In the week since Gazprom Arena withdrew, multiple alternative venues across Russia have stepped forward to offer to host the controversial shows. Moscow’s Luzhniki Stadium, the largest sports venue in Russia by capacity, confirmed its chief executive has said the venue would “consider” hosting the concerts if approached by promoters. Even a 1,500-capacity arena at a medieval-themed museum near the southern Russian town of Anapa has offered to host, with museum head Vladimir Vladimirov telling state news agency RIA “we have a wonderful arena here… Everyone will fit.”

    Large-scale concerts by A-list Western musicians have become extremely rare in Russia following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, with a small handful of mainstream artists including Jason Derulo and Flo Rida having performed in the country since the war began. West himself has had multiple planned shows cancelled across Europe and North America in recent years following his public antisemitic and pro-Nazi comments, and the rapper has not yet issued any public statement on the current controversy surrounding his Russian concerts. According to Fontanka’s reporting, West has already received a multi-million dollar down payment for the planned Saint Petersburg dates, adding further financial stakes to the ongoing uncertainty.

  • The missing in Nepal-Tibet flash floods

    The missing in Nepal-Tibet flash floods

    Devastating flash floods and landslides that hit the remote Nepal-Tibet border region have left a massive trail of destruction, with updated official figures released Friday showing the number of people unaccounted for has surged dramatically to more than 2,400, and at least 584 lives have been confirmed lost. Disaster response officials warn that these casualty numbers are expected to shift further in the coming days, a common scenario in the chaotic aftermath of large-scale natural disasters when search and rescue operations are still ongoing.

    Breaking down the latest data from authorities on both sides of the border, Nepal’s national disaster management agency raised its count of missing people on Nepal’s side of the border to 1,924 on Friday. The previous day, Chinese authorities reported 558 people missing on the Tibet side of the border, and no updated figures were released by Beijing on Friday. Combining the two sets of data brings the confirmed total of missing people across the entire affected border region to at least 2,482, representing an increase of more than 1,000 in just 24 hours.

    A large share of the missing are foreign nationals, including international tourists and cross-border workers. On Friday, Nepal’s disaster agency recorded 517 foreigners still unaccounted for on its territory. Adding the 260 foreigners reported missing by Chinese officials on the Tibet side on Thursday, the total number of foreign missing across the region reaches at least 777.

    Nepal’s national tourism board released separate tracking data on Friday, which puts the number of tourists of all nationalities out of contact at 622, 473 of whom are international visitors. The board also confirmed that 121 tourists stranded by the disaster have already been pulled to safety, though a full unified count of all rescued people, including local residents and foreign workers, has not yet been released to the public.

    Across the entire affected area, the confirmed death toll now stands at 584: 579 fatalities recorded by Nepali authorities, and five reported by China.

    On Nepal’s side of the border, the tourism board counts 149 Nepali tourists among the 622 unaccounted for, though the national disaster agency lists a lower figure of 127. As of Friday, the full number of local non-tourist residents still missing across Nepal’s affected districts remains unclear, but informal estimates from officials suggest the figure runs into the hundreds.

    Multiple countries have now confirmed that their citizens are among the missing. China’s foreign ministry confirmed Thursday that nearly 100 Chinese nationals are unaccounted for in Nepal; Nepal’s tourism board separately reports eight Chinese missing, with 16 already rescued. These numbers do not include the 558 people missing on the Chinese side of the border.

    India has 98 citizens missing in Nepal, with 85 already rescued, according to Nepal’s latest tourism board data. U.S. officials reported Thursday that 90 American citizens were missing, with three rescued and no confirmed U.S. fatalities; Nepal’s tourism board now puts the number of U.S. missing at 65, with two rescued.

    Ukraine has 61 citizens missing in Nepal per Friday’s Nepali data, though Ukraine’s foreign ministry pegged the number at 56 as of Thursday evening. Other countries with large numbers of citizens unaccounted for include Malaysia (51), Australia (39 per Australian officials, 35 per Nepali data), the United Kingdom (33), Latvia (29), and Canada (25 per Nepal, 30 across both Nepal and Tibet per Canadian officials). Nine South Koreans, nine Singaporeans, nine Russians, eight Germans and smaller groups from dozens of other nations are also missing, with multiple countries reporting that a small number of their citizens have already been rescued.

    Not all missing foreign nationals have had their nationalities publicly broken down: the 260 foreigners missing on the Chinese side of the border have not been sorted by nationality, and the nationalities of non-tourist missing people in Nepal also have not been released publicly. Search and rescue operations are continuing across the hard-hit border region, with teams working to reach remote cut-off areas to locate survivors and recover bodies.

  • ‘Ridiculous’: Ivan Cleary erupts after contentious bunker ruling as Cameron Ciraldo defends “dumb play”

    ‘Ridiculous’: Ivan Cleary erupts after contentious bunker ruling as Cameron Ciraldo defends “dumb play”

    The National Rugby League (NRL) clash between the Penrith Panthers and Canterbury Bulldogs at CommBank Stadium delivered a 24-10 victory for the Panthers on Friday night, but the final result was overshadowed by a contentious video referee decision that has reignited debate over the league’s bunker review system. The controversial call denied Panthers winger Tom Jenkins a first-half try, a ruling that head coach Ivan Cleary has described as “ridiculous” and questioned the core purpose of the video review system.

    The moment of contention unfolded in the 24th minute of the match. After a Panthers kick ricocheted into the air, Jenkins and Bulldogs winger Jacob Kiraz jumped to contest possession. Jenkins stripped the ball cleanly from Kiraz mid-air before grounding it to score what seemed a valid try. On-field referee ruled it a no try, and the bunker upheld the decision, confirming that Kiraz had completed a secure catch before losing the ball. The ruling gifted Canterbury an extra seven-tackle set, and just a minute later, Bulldogs halfback Matt Burton crossed to score a try off the back of the unexpected possession.

    In a fiery post-match press conference, Cleary questioned the logic of the ruling and the broader effectiveness of the bunker system, which was introduced to eliminate clear mistakes from on-field calls. “If he caught the ball with no one around him in the air and then landed and dropped it, then what would happen?” Cleary asked reporters. “It was just ridiculous. It was a huge call because then they get a penalty and they score. It’s frustrating. I think the jury is out whether that [removing clear mistakes] is happening, or if the bunker is actually creating more controversy than it solves.”

    The denied try also stalled Jenkins’ race for the NRL’s leading try-scorer title this season, leaving him level on 28 tries with South Sydney winger Alex Johnston, who is set to add to his tally when his side faces the Gold Coast Titans in the upcoming round. Jenkins himself offered a measured response to the decision from the sheds after the match, drawing a comparison to a similar contest he had a year prior that was ruled a try. “I understand that it’s in the air, but we were competing. I felt like I came down with it and we were still fighting for it when we were coming down,” Jenkins explained. “I’m not sure what the full ruling was, but I think they said his foot was on the ground. In saying that, there’s not much you can do about it.”

    Panthers captain Nathan Cleary echoed the team’s confusion, saying the ruling’s interpretation of a completed catch made little sense. “He (the referee) said that he had taken control of the ball, but it’s not a contest in the air. I don’t know. I could understand if his (Kiraz) feet hit the ground and he still had control of the ball, but that wasn’t the case so I don’t know when it’s deemed a catch.”

    While the decision did not change the final outcome of Friday’s match, the broader NRL community has grown increasingly concerned that similar controversial bunker calls could ultimately decide the result of a high-stakes match later in the season, including the grand final.

    The contentious bunker ruling was not the only divisive decision of the night. In a separate incident, Bulldogs rookie AJ Jones was only penalised for a blatant push in the back on Panthers fullback Dylan Edwards, avoiding a sin bin dismissal that many expected. The incident came after Edwards collided heavily with Bulldogs centre Matt Burton, who was forced off the field for a mandatory head injury assessment. Jones took exception to the collision and ran a long distance to shove Edwards from behind, resulting in a penalty for Penrith.

    Ivan Cleary argued that Jones should have spent time in the sin bin for the incident, particularly after referees had warned both sides earlier in the match against melees and unsportsmanlike contact. “I think he potentially (should have gone to the sin bin). It was a pretty dumb play. Dyl didn’t do anything wrong. There was a melee that they don’t want,” Cleary said.

    Bulldogs head coach Cameron Ciraldo acknowledged the incident was a learning opportunity for the young rookie, but defended Jones’ mentality of sticking up for his teammates. “It’s probably a good learning for him,” Ciraldo said. “But what this group has really prided themselves on is sticking up for each other. What I get really disappointed at is when the opposition does something and we don’t stick up for each other. That’s why AJ is going to be a really good Bulldog for a long time because he cares about his mates and he sticks up for his mates. He’ll learn from that from a smarts point of view, but I never want him to lose that mentality to stick up for his mates.”

    The split of opinions between the two head coaches on both controversial decisions highlights the ongoing tension around consistent officiating in the NRL, as the competition heads towards the finals series.

  • Norway’s King Harald dead at 89

    Norway’s King Harald dead at 89

    Norway’s King Harald V, the world’s oldest reigning European monarch, has passed away at the age of 89 at Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Royal Palace confirmed in an official statement released Friday. The royal announcement brought immediate official and public mourning across the Scandinavian nation, with Crown Prince Haakon, Harald’s 53-year-old son, set to automatically succeed his father as Norway’s new head of state.

    “It is with deep sadness that we announce that His Majesty King Harald passed away today. King Harald passed away peacefully at Oslo University Hospital on Friday, August 28 at 6:35 am (0435 GMT),” the palace shared in its formal statement. An Agence France-Presse reporter on the ground in Oslo confirmed the royal palace’s main flag was lowered to half-mast shortly after the announcement. While only a small group of onlookers had gathered outside the palace grounds earlier that morning, crowds grew to hundreds in the palace courtyard after the official confirmation of the king’s death, with hundreds of floral arrangements already placed at the site in the preceding 24 hours.

    For many Norwegians, the passing of King Harald marks the end of an era that defined modern Norwegian monarchy. “Of course it’s sad. He’s a symbol of our country. And naturally, it’s sad when something so beautiful comes to an end,” 36-year-old Oslo resident Maja Otvik told AFP outside the palace gates Friday.

    Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store echoed national grief in his own official statement, saying he received the news of the king’s death with “deep sorrow.” “An entire nation mourns, and at the same time remains profoundly grateful for a long life devoted to Norway,” the prime minister said, adding, “King Harald loved Norway. And Norway loved its king.” Store announced that the national government would convene an emergency conference in the coming days, after which the full cabinet will travel to the royal palace to meet with newly succeeded King Haakon. Store had already canceled a planned official work trip to Germany on Thursday, after the palace disclosed that Harald’s health had declined to an “extremely serious” state that prompted the entire immediate royal family to gather at his bedside. Queen Sonja, Harald’s 89-year-old wife, Crown Prince Haakon, Haakon’s wife Mette-Marit, and the couple’s adult children all spent the day of Thursday at the hospital, with local media reporting Haakon maintained an overnight vigil at his father’s bedside before his passing.

    Harald first ascended the Norwegian throne in 1991, following the death of his father King Olav V. For more than three decades, he anchored the Norwegian monarchy as a unifying national institution, building widespread public support through his famously unassuming, modest personal style. He had faced recurring health challenges in recent years, including a 2020 procedure to fit a cardiac pacemaker that forced him to scale back his full schedule of official public duties. Throughout his declining health, however, Harald repeatedly rejected calls to abdicate the throne, noting he had taken a lifelong oath of service to the Norwegian parliament when he assumed the crown.

    Harald was first admitted to Oslo University Hospital on August 17 to receive treatment for haemolytic anaemia, a blood disorder that causes abnormal breakdown of red blood cells, leading to chronic fatigue and difficulty breathing. Prior to this admission, he had already been hospitalized once in February 2025 during a private winter trip to Tenerife, where he received care for a severe infection and dehydration.

    The past 12 months have brought a series of personal and public challenges to the entire Norwegian royal household. In May, Queen Sonja was briefly hospitalized for treatment of heart-related issues. Crown Princess Mette-Marit, Haakon’s wife, has faced ongoing public scrutiny since January, when court documents released in the United States revealed years of regular, at times intimate correspondence with disgraced American financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein between 2011 and 2014, a period after Epstein had already completed a conviction for sex offenses. Just one month ago, Mette-Marit, who lives with a chronic serious lung disease, underwent a successful lung transplant. The crown princess’s son from a prior relationship, Marius Borg Hoiby, is also at the center of public attention after being sentenced to four years in prison in June on two counts of rape and 32 additional criminal charges, including multiple counts of violence against a former romantic partner. Hoiby has since filed an appeal of the conviction and sentence.

    Despite these recent controversies surrounding the extended royal family, the Norwegian monarchy retains broad popular support among the Norwegian public, a popularity almost universally credited to King Harald’s steady, unifying leadership and approachable personal brand. With Haakon’s ascension, Norway enters a new royal era that will seek to maintain that public trust while navigating the challenges facing the modern institution.

  • Tech stocks lift Australian sharemarket to cap winning week, tech giant Dicker Data rises 20pc

    Tech stocks lift Australian sharemarket to cap winning week, tech giant Dicker Data rises 20pc

    The Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) has closed out a positive trading week, wrapping up with a technology-driven rally on Friday that pushed the benchmark index into positive territory even as ongoing concerns about potential interest rate hikes simmer among investors.

    Upbeat quarterly results from major U.S. tech giants Nvidia and Salesforce spilled over into overnight trading on Wall Street, and that momentum carried over to Australia’s domestic tech sector, which led all industry gains for the day. By the closing bell, the ASX 200 benchmark index climbed 0.6% to settle at 9092.3 points, with nine out of 11 tracked industry sectors finishing in positive territory. For the full week, the index logged a solid 0.37% gain, arriving at the final stretch of the quarterly corporate earnings reporting season.

    A number of individual stocks posted dramatic single-day gains. Dicker Data, a leading Australian IT software and hardware provider, saw its share price surge 20.7% to $15.30 after the firm reported a 37% jump in first-half net earnings. Fiona Brown, the company’s managing director, attributed the strong performance to growing market opportunities driven by global enterprise technology refresh cycles, rising corporate investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure, and sustained high demand for software and cybersecurity solutions.

    Other tech stocks also posted significant gains. SaaS firm Readytech Holdings recovered 8.8% in Friday trading, trimming its year-to-date loss to 37% amid a broader sector-wide pullback for software-as-a-service stocks. Accounting software provider Xero notched its best single-day performance in two months, climbing 4.8% to $85.64, while Technology One gained 3.5%, and WiseTech, NEXTDC and LIFE360 all posted gains between 2.1% and 2.7%. In the resources sector, Pantoro Gold rose 5.9% and integrated lithium developer Vulcan Energy gained 5% to rank among the day’s top movers.

    Not all stocks ended the day in positive territory, however. Property exchange platform PEXA plummeted 17.4% to hit an all-time low in its five years of public trading on the ASX, after the company released full-year results that included guidance forecasting a sharp slowdown in future earnings driven by declining homeowner sales activity in a cooling property market.

    Investment firm WAM Capital also faced severe volatility, with shares dropping 18.5% to reach a 16-year low. The company reported an after-tax operating loss of $125.9 million for the 2024 financial year, a sharp reversal from the $219.6 million profit it posted in the prior year. It also announced a halved partially franked dividend, ending six consecutive years of dividend payouts that exceeded realized annual profits.

    Other notable single-day moves included Virgin Australia, which announced its first dividend since relisting on the exchange. Even though the airline reported a 13% uplift in annual earnings, the announcement failed to attract buyer interest, and shares dipped 1.4%. Retail giant Harvey Norman fell 1.8% as ongoing weak trade conditions in the United Kingdom weighed on investor sentiment. Jack Cowin, chairman of Domino’s Pizza Australia, purchased an additional $3 million in Domino’s shares this week, just days after the chain reported a full-year net loss of $134.2 million. Cowin stepped down from his role as non-executive chairman on August 5, and Domino’s shares dipped 1% in Friday trading.

    Market analysts have noted rising volatility during the final stretch of this earnings reporting season. Morningstar analysts have adjusted their fair value estimates upward for roughly one-third of the Australian companies they cover this reporting cycle, while cutting valuations for only around 20% of covered firms. Average share price movements on earnings results day currently sit at 6.5% in either direction, a level not far off the all-time high for daily volatility set back in February 2025. “We’re seeing share price volatility pick up again too, little surprise given the smaller stocks cluster in the final week,” Morningstar analyst Lochlan Halloway explained in a research note this week.

    Despite hotter-than-expected domestic inflation data released earlier this week that stoked broader concerns about imminent interest rate hikes from the Reserve Bank of Australia, the interest rate-sensitive ASX 200 still managed to carry through to a weekly gain, underscoring the strength of the tech-driven rally that anchored the end of the trading week.

  • Norway’s King Harald V, unifying force who weathered family storms

    Norway’s King Harald V, unifying force who weathered family storms

    Norway is marking the passing of its longest-serving modern monarch, King Harald V, who died Friday at the age of 89, leaving behind a legacy of national unity that endured even as family scandals rocked the final years of his 35-year reign.

    Ascending to the Norwegian throne on January 17, 1991, following the death of his father King Olav V, Harald spent more than three decades on the throne, making him Europe’s oldest sitting monarch by the end of his life. Plagued by worsening chronic health issues in his final years, he repeatedly rejected calls to abdicate, insisting his parliamentary oath bound him to serve for the entirety of his lifetime. He was admitted to an Oslo hospital on August 17 for complications related to hemolytic anemia, a blood disorder, and the Royal Palace confirmed his death earlier this week.

    Though Norway’s constitutional monarchy grants the head of state limited formal political power, Harald earned a reputation as a steady, unifying force for the nation, consistently finding words that resonated with the public during moments of national crisis. One of his most iconic moments came in the wake of the 2011 twin terror attacks carried out by far-right extremist Anders Behring Breivik, which killed 77 people in the deadliest attack on Norwegian soil since World War II. Standing before a grieving nation, Harald affirmed: “I firmly believe that freedom is stronger than fear. I firmly believe in an open Norwegian democracy and society.”

    A lifelong champion of Norway’s progressive social values, Harald made his stance on inclusivity clear in a 2016 speech marking the 25th anniversary of his reign. “Norwegians are girls who love girls, boys who love boys, and girls and boys who love each other,” he said. “Norwegians believe in God, Allah, the Universe and nothing.”

    Unlike many of his European royal peers—including Spain’s Juan Carlos, Belgium’s Albert II, the Netherlands’ Beatrix, and Denmark’s Margrethe II, all of whom abdicated during their lifetimes—Harald held firm to his commitment to reign until death. “The oath I’ve sworn before parliament lasts as long as my life, that’s how simple it is,” he stated repeatedly throughout his later years.

    Born in 1937, Harald’s early life was shaped by World War II. Just three years after his birth, Nazi forces invaded Norway, forcing the young prince into evacuation: he first fled to neighboring Sweden, then to the United States, where he lived in Washington D.C. with his mother Princess Martha for the remainder of the war, while his father and grandfather remained in London in exile. He returned to Norway after the war ended, growing up with as normal a life as possible for a royal heir.

    An accomplished athlete, Harald competed for Norway in sailing at three Olympic Games, and shared his countrymen’s deep love of outdoor recreation, including fishing, hunting, and skiing. Standing tall and solidly built, he was known for his dry, sharp sense of humor hidden beneath a reserved public demeanor. His health began declining decades ago: he underwent bladder cancer surgery in 2003, heart surgery two years later, received a pacemaker in 2024, and relied on crutches for mobility in his final years, with repeated hospitalizations for ongoing complications.

    Harald’s personal life broke with royal tradition decades ago: he wed Sonja Haraldsen, a commoner, after a nine-year courtship that faced stiff opposition from his father and the Norwegian ruling elite before finally winning approval for the marriage in 1968. That experience shaped his later decision to allow his own children to marry outside the aristocracy—a choice that would ultimately put the monarchy under unprecedented strain in his final years.

    The closing years of Harald’s reign were marred by a string of family controversies that eroded public support for the Norwegian monarchy, even as the king himself remained personally popular. In 2024, his daughter Princess Martha-Louise, a prominent advocate for alternative healing, made global headlines when she married an American self-described shaman. Earlier this year, the release of Jeffrey Epstein’s court documents revealed a previously unreported close friendship between the convicted sex offender and Crown Princess Mette-Marit, the wife of Crown Prince Haakon, Norway’s heir to the throne. Just months later, Mette-Marit’s son from a prior relationship, Marius Borg Hoiby, was sentenced to four years in prison by an Oslo court on charges of rape and assault; he has since appealed the conviction. Though Hoiby holds no formal role in the royal family, his legal case became the biggest scandal to hit the Norwegian monarchy in modern history.

    Throughout the unfolding turmoil, Harald maintained a calm, measured public stance. In his 2025 New Year’s address, he reflected on the challenges facing his family, saying: “At the core of being human lies the fact that none of us is spared from pain and adversity.”

    While Harald retained high personal popularity to the end, praised by Norwegians for his unassuming, modest lifestyle, the scandals dragged public support for the monarchy to historic lows. A February 2026 opinion poll from public broadcaster NRK found just 60 percent of Norwegians still backed the institution, a level not seen in modern Norwegian history.

  • Anger in Austria over business park on former Nazi camp site

    Anger in Austria over business park on former Nazi camp site

    A decades-long reckoning with Austria’s Nazi history has reignited in the small town of Leobersdorf, where a planned commercial development on the grounds of a former Nazi forced labour and concentration camp complex has sparked widespread public outcry from historians, Holocaust remembrance groups, and local activists.

    Today, only scattered crumbling concrete fragments hidden in overgrown meadows mark what was once the Weinberglager complex, a sprawling detention facility built shortly after Nazi Germany’s 1938 annexation of Austria. For years, the site held thousands of prisoners of war and forced labourers, and later operated as the Hirtenberg subcamp of Mauthausen, Austria’s second-largest concentration camp for women prisoners. Between September 1944 and April 1945, roughly 400 women—mostly from the Soviet Union, with smaller groups from Italy and Poland—were held at Hirtenberg and forced to produce infantry ammunition at a nearby arms factory. After the end of World War II, most camp structures were demolished, repurposed, or left to decay, leaving only faint underground and surface traces of the atrocities committed there.

    In 2024, plans for a full business park on the 40-kilometre site south of Vienna—covering land that once made up the concentration camp, including a cold storage warehouse and a new outlet for German discount supermarket chain Lidl—were made public, immediately drawing sharp criticism. The Federal Monuments Office of Austria has ruled that surviving traces of the camp are not substantial enough to warrant official protected monument status, clearing the way for construction to begin, and bulldozers have already started preparation work on the site. Activists and international remembrance organizations have since ramped up calls to halt development and preserve the site as a historical memorial.

    For Erich Strobl, who leads a local campaign to protect a portion of the site, the development amounts to sacrificing a site of traumatic historical memory to commercial interests. “For me, it’s a sad feeling, because a place burdened by history is being built over, sacrificed to the economy,” Strobl told reporters. The International Mauthausen Committee, the leading organization advocating for remembrance of the Mauthausen camp system, has taken a firm stance: “A former concentration camp must not be built over with new structures.”

    Josef Pumberger, a board member of the Austrian branch of the Mauthausen Committee, called the ongoing work in 2026 a source of profound outrage. Standing at the site where concrete foundation columns already rise from the ground, Pumberger said he felt “grief, anger, rage, that something like this can happen in Austria in the year 2026.” He argues that the small stele memorial erected at the site in 2024 is insufficient for meaningful remembrance. Without tangible remains of the original camp structures, he says, memory becomes abstract: “It is very important to have tangible evidence of the buildings in which the Nazis imprisoned people, tortured them, killed them. Otherwise it becomes a virtual act of remembrance, or one that exists only in books and photos and films.”

    Controversy has also been stoked by revelations that the land was previously owned by Leobersdorf mayor Andreas Ramharter, who sold the plot in staggered sales in 2022 and 2023 for more than €15 million ($17.5 million), according to local Austrian media. Ramharter declined to comment on the sale or the development when contacted by AFP. The project developer, Austrian firm TRA LEO GmbH & Co KG, has said it is willing to support the creation of a small on-site memorial to camp victims. Lidl has also pushed back against criticism, confirming its plans to open a store but emphasizing that its outlet will be built on an adjacent plot, not directly on the former concentration camp grounds.

    The debate over the Leobersdorf development cuts to the heart of Austria’s ongoing, uneven reckoning with its Nazi past. In the decades immediately after World War II, Austria widely framed itself as an innocent victim of Nazi aggression, overlooking the widespread complicity of Austrian citizens in the Holocaust and Nazi war crimes. It was not until the late 1980s that the country—where Adolf Hitler was born—began a formal public examination of its historical responsibility.

    Bertrand Perz, a leading Austrian historian specializing in the history of the Mauthausen camp system, notes that even a public debate like the one unfolding in Leobersdorf would have been unthinkable in the 1980s, reflecting growing societal sensitivity to the importance of preserving Nazi-era sites. But Perz also notes that this growing demand for remembrance now clashes with a competing cultural impulse: a growing push among segments of the public to “move on” from the discussion of Nazi-era history. This shift has been amplified by the rising political influence of Austria’s far-right Freedom Party (FPOe), a party founded by former Nazis that placed first in 2024 national legislative elections. Though the FPOe failed to form a national governing coalition, it holds power in five of Austria’s nine federal states as part of regional governing coalitions.

    For many residents of central Leobersdorf contacted by reporters, the controversy has either flown under the radar or is a topic they prefer not to address. But for activists and historians, the fate of the Hirtenberg site is about more than just one development project—it is a test of Austria’s commitment to confronting its Nazi past amid shifting political currents that prioritize commercial growth and historical amnesia over remembrance.