标签: North America

北美洲

  • Nebraska police shoot knife-wielding woman who abducted child from Walmart

    Nebraska police shoot knife-wielding woman who abducted child from Walmart

    A harrowing alleged kidnapping attempt outside a Walmart in Omaha, Nebraska, has left a young child injured and the suspect dead after police opened fire on the knife-wielding attacker, according to local law enforcement. The incident, which unfolded on a Tuesday afternoon, has sparked renewed conversation about public safety and the handling of individuals with untreated mental illness in communities across the United States.

    According to official police accounts, 31-year-old Noemi Guzman first shoplifted a knife from the Walmart location before targeting a 3-year-old boy and his unsuspecting babysitter. Surveillance footage from inside the store confirms that after stealing the blade, Guzman approached the pair as they shopped, brandished the weapon, and forced the babysitter to move ahead of her while the boy remained secured in his shopping trolley. She then led the two through the store and out into the adjacent parking lot, where bystanders quickly alerted local authorities.

    When officers arrived on the scene, body-worn camera footage captured Guzman holding the knife directly against the young boy. Officers repeatedly ordered her to drop the weapon, but she refused to comply. Before the two responding officers opened fire, Guzman sliced the boy across the cheek, leaving a visible wound that required medical attention. Guzman was pronounced dead at the scene by first responders, while the young child was transported to a local hospital for treatment of injuries that medical officials confirmed were not life-threatening.

    The child’s parents, Sara Hillman and Casey Hillman, spoke publicly about the traumatic ordeal in an interview with CBS, the BBC’s US partner network. “I almost lost him,” Sara Hillman said, describing the lingering shock of the random attack. She added that she has repeatedly replayed the incident in her head, asking herself what could have happened if police had not arrived in time. Casey Hillman issued a urgent plea to other parents to remain vigilant in public spaces, urging them to keep a close eye on their children at all times. “Hold your kids tight, because you never know how it can turn out,” he said. “Pay attention to what’s going on around you.” The couple also shared that their son, who typically loves playing outside, was too frightened to leave the family home the day after the attack, a sign of the emotional trauma the incident has left.

    Public records have since revealed that Guzman had a long documented history of mental illness and violent offenses prior to Tuesday’s attack. In 2024, a woman matching Guzman’s name and description was arrested on charges of attempted arson and assault with a deadly weapon after she allegedly started a fire inside a private residence and injured her father with a knife. Following that incident, she is accused of breaking into a local Catholic church while still armed with a knife, where she destroyed property inside the building, forcing a priest to barricade himself in a locked room to escape harm.

    After the 2024 arrest, Guzman was found not responsible for her actions by reason of insanity. Court documents confirm that a judge diagnosed her with schizophrenia and ordered that she remain under continuous court-ordered psychiatric supervision. It is unclear as of this reporting whether Guzman was compliant with her supervision requirements and treatment plan at the time of the Walmart kidnapping attempt.

    Local law enforcement has not yet announced any further updates to the investigation, and the two officers who opened fire on Guzman have been placed on standard administrative leave while the shooting undergoes an internal review, a common policy for officer-involved shootings in the United States.

  • BBC at the site of Trump’s planned ‘triumphal arch’

    BBC at the site of Trump’s planned ‘triumphal arch’

    A proposed 250-foot monument, dubbed a ‘triumphal arch’ and tied to former U.S. President Donald Trump, has sparked fierce public debate as planners move forward with site preparations, with BBC reporting on the ground from the proposed development location.

    BBC correspondent Ione Wells has conducted on-location reporting to break down key details of the project, outlining the exact plot of land where developers intend to construct the massive structure. The proposed arch, framed by supporters as a tribute to American achievement and a symbolic landmark honoring national service, has drawn fierce pushback from critics who question its purpose, cost, and connection to Trump’s political legacy.

    The project has emerged as a flashpoint for broader tensions over how the U.S. commemorates its political figures and national history. Opponents argue the 250-foot structure is an unnecessary vanity project designed to celebrate Trump’s political career, rather than serve any meaningful public or historical purpose. They also point to the projected multi-million dollar construction cost, arguing public funds could be better allocated to pressing domestic priorities including infrastructure repairs, social programs, and community services.

    Supporters of the plan, by contrast, frame the arch as a long-overdue tribute to American identity and national unity, arguing the monument will become a popular tourist destination that boosts local economic activity for the region where it is set to be built. As debate continues over the project’s future, on-the-ground reporting from the site has shed new light on the practical logistics of the proposal and the deep divides it has created across political and community lines.

  • Vote to stop Iran war fails in US Senate again as Democrats vow to keep trying

    Vote to stop Iran war fails in US Senate again as Democrats vow to keep trying

    A fourth legislative push to curb executive authority to engage in military hostilities against Iran has been defeated in the United States Senate, deepening partisan divisions over Washington’s ongoing military involvement in the region. The failed war powers resolution, which would have required immediate cessation of all U.S. military action against Iran without explicit congressional authorization, was rejected by a 52-48 vote on the chamber floor, with nearly all votes falling along established party lines.

    With the Senate currently under Republican majority leadership, nearly every GOP lawmaker united to block the measure. Only one Republican senator, Rand Paul of Kentucky, broke with his caucus to back the resolution for the fourth consecutive time, matching his position on earlier versions of the bill. On the Democratic side, one party member – Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania – crossed party lines to vote against the restriction on presidential war power.

    Democratic sponsors of the resolution have made clear they will not abandon their efforts, announcing plans to bring an identical or similar resolution to a vote every single moving forward, even if passage remains out of reach. According to Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, this repeated voting strategy will ensure every legislator’s position on the conflict is formally recorded, making it clear to the American public which elected officials support ongoing military engagement. The 1973 War Powers Resolution, the federal legislation that forms the legal foundation of this push, was originally passed to curtail unilateral presidential war authority after the escalation of the Vietnam War under Richard Nixon. That law requires congressional approval for any military engagement lasting longer than 60 days, with a single 30-day extension allowed if the White House cites pressing national security concerns.

    U.S. strikes in collaboration with Israel against Iranian targets began on February 28, putting the 60-day deadline on track to expire mid-May. With that deadline approaching, some Republican lawmakers have signaled they may reconsider their position if the conflict is still ongoing after this month. Missouri Republican Senator Josh Hawley told the BBC that a rapid end to the conflict aligns with U.S. national interests, adding that he hopes diplomatic negotiations will produce a resolution within the coming days. “That would be ideal,” Hawley stated. Paul echoed the expectation of shifting Republican votes after the 60-day window, telling reporters he anticipates more GOP members will join him in supporting the resolution once the statutory deadline passes.

    President Donald Trump has offered contradictory timelines for the conflict’s duration. In an interview with Fox News that aired Wednesday, Trump claimed the conflict is “close to over.” To date, however, the administration has moved forward with its planned military blockade of Iranian ports, retaining broad, unified support from congressional Republicans for the president’s actions.

  • Fans overcharged by $1.72 each by ‘monopoly’ Ticketmaster owner

    Fans overcharged by $1.72 each by ‘monopoly’ Ticketmaster owner

    A federal jury has delivered a landmark ruling against entertainment conglomerate Live Nation Entertainment, finding that the company’s control of the live event ticketing space through its ownership of Ticketmaster constitutes illegal monopoly behavior that systematically overcharges music fans across the United States. The verdict comes after four days of closed-door deliberations in a high-stakes antitrust trial that industry analysts say could reshape the future of the $150 billion global live music sector. The case, first filed by the U.S. Department of Justice under former Attorney General Merrick Garland in May 2024, had long called for aggressive structural remedies, including forcing Live Nation to spin off parts of its business or fully separate from its Ticketmaster ticketing division.

    Prosecutors argued throughout the legal proceedings that Live Nation’s combined control of major concert venues, music festival brands, and primary ticketing infrastructure has created an insurmountable barrier to market entry for smaller competitors, driving up ticket costs and eroding service quality for millions of concertgoers. The jury’s specific findings included a determination that Ticketmaster overcharged customers by an average of $1.72 (approximately £1.27) per ticket sold, a figure that will serve as the baseline calculation for any future financial damages awarded in the case.

    Live Nation has consistently rejected the antitrust claims, maintaining during the trial that it faces fierce competition from a range of industry players, including independent sports teams, third-party concert promoters, and rival venue operators. The path to trial has been marked by unexpected procedural shifts: earlier this year, the Department of Justice announced it had reached a tentative settlement with Live Nation and Ticketmaster just two weeks before the trial was scheduled to begin. That sudden withdrawal drew sharp public criticism from presiding judge Arun Subramanian, who questioned the timing and substance of the deal. Along with the DOJ, three U.S. states — Arkansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota — also dropped out of the litigation following the settlement announcement.

    However, a bipartisan coalition of 36 state attorneys general chose to continue pushing the case to trial, rejecting the proposed federal settlement as insufficient to address the company’s anti-competitive practices. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a lead figure in the state coalition, emphasized the significance of the jury’s decision in the face of reduced federal antitrust enforcement. “This verdict shows just how far states can go to protect our residents from big corporations that are using their power to illegally raise prices and rip-off Americans,” Bonta told reporters Wednesday. He added, “We are incredibly proud of today’s outcome — and especially proud of our coalition made up of red and blue states alike who understood we needed to come together to protect our consumers, businesses, and state economies from Live Nation’s illegal conduct.”

    The scrutiny of Live Nation’s market dominance exploded into public view in 2022, following the botched Ticketmaster ticket sale for Taylor Swift’s blockbuster Eras Tour. Unprecedented fan demand crashed the Ticketmaster platform, leaving millions of Swift’s loyal fans — known widely as Swifties — locked out of purchasing tickets and sparking widespread public outrage. Ticketmaster ultimately issued a public apology to both Swift and her fans, and the chaos led to a high-profile U.S. Senate hearing examining consolidation in the live music industry. As of Wednesday evening, Live Nation has not issued an official response to the jury verdict, and media requests for comment from the company have not yet been returned. Judge Subramanian will now preside over future proceedings to determine what remedies will be imposed, ranging from financial penalties to the forced break-up of the Live Nation-Ticketmaster merger.

  • SantaCon organiser charged with wire fraud in New York

    SantaCon organiser charged with wire fraud in New York

    One of New York City’s most iconic annual holiday traditions has become the center of a major federal fraud case, after the president of the event’s organizing body was arrested on charges of stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars in charitable donations for personal use.

    Stefan Pildes, a 50-year-old New Jersey resident, faces a single count of wire fraud over his alleged misuse of funds raised through SantaCon, the hugely popular December pub crawl that draws tens of thousands of costumed participants each year. Prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York unveiled the charges this week, laying out a years-long scheme that they say exploited the holiday generosity of participants and local business owners across the city.

    Every year, SantaCon draws roughly 25,000 attendees, who purchase tickets to take part in the bar crawl while dressed as Santa Claus and other seasonal characters. The event has long been marketed to the public as a large-scale charity fundraiser, with proceeds from ticket sales and partnerships pledged to local nonprofits.

    According to the official charging document, Pildes raised approximately $2.7 million through the event between 2019 and April 2026. Instead of directing the bulk of these funds to charitable causes, prosecutors allege that Pildes diverted more than half of the total revenue into a personal “slush fund” that he used to cover a wide range of extravagant personal expenses.

    Court filings detail that the accused spent hundreds of thousands of dollars of stolen charity money on everything from luxury vacations and fine dining to concert tickets and major home renovations. Among the most high-value purchases outlined in the charges are $365,000 in renovations for a private lakefront property Pildes owns in New Jersey, $124,000 in costs related to a luxury Manhattan apartment, and nearly $3,000 for a single birthday dinner at a Michelin-starred restaurant in Manhattan.

    Only a tiny fraction of the $2.7 million raised was ever donated to registered charities, according to the documents filed in court.

    “Stefan Pildes promoted SantaCon as an event grounded in charitable giving, but instead of donating the millions of dollars he raised, he ran his own con game,” U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton said in an official statement announcing the charges. “He took advantage of New Yorkers’ generous holiday spirit to finance his lifestyle through personal expenses, big and small.”

    As of the release of the charging documents, no defense attorney has been listed for Pildes in official court records. If convicted on the wire fraud charge, Pildes faces a maximum penalty of up to 20 years in federal prison.

  • Madonna announces sequel to Confessions On A Dancefloor album

    Madonna announces sequel to Confessions On A Dancefloor album

    After years of teases and months of widespread fan speculation, pop icon Madonna has made it official: her 15th studio album, *Confessions II*, a sequel to her 2005 dance classic *Confessions on a Dance Floor*, will hit shelves and streaming platforms worldwide on July 3. This marks the superstar’s first full-length new release since her 2019 album *Madame X*.

    The iconic singer first began dropping hints about the follow-up project back in 2023, and last week kicked off the official announcement rollout by wiping her entire Instagram feed and updating her bio with a famous lyric from the 2005 lead single *Hung Up*: “Time goes by so slowly.” The next day, she shared the full confirmation alongside key details about the upcoming record, as well as a 60-second preview clip of the album’s opening track, *I Feel So Free*. Built around a pulsing, throbbing synth bassline, the new track weaves in a beloved line from Madonna’s 1980s hit *Into the Groove*: “Out here on the dance floor, I feel so free.”

    The original 2005 *Confessions on a Dance Floor* is widely regarded as one of the best albums of Madonna’s decades-spanning career, alongside fan and critical favorites like *Like a Prayer* and *Ray of Light*. The unapologetically euphoric, club-focused record gave the world global hits including *Sorry* and *Hung Up*, which famously sampled ABBA to massive commercial and critical success. For the long-awaited sequel, Madonna has reunited with British producer Stuart Price, who co-created the original 2005 album with her. The pair first recorded the first installment in the loft of Price’s London home, where Madonna even carved her name into the studio rafters during breaks from recording. The pair most recently worked together on Madonna’s 2023 *Celebration* tour, and by early 2024, they were back in the studio together at Price’s new west London space. Madonna shared the news of their reunion on social media with the playful line: “Back in the Stu with Stuart Price.” Weeks later, she updated her fanbase that working on the record had been “medicine for my SOUL,” and shared behind-the-scenes photos showing her children joining her in the recording process. Price, whose production credits also include work with Dua Lipa, The Killers, Jessie Ware, Rina Sawayama and Pet Shop Boys, has co-produced the entirety of the new album.

    In an official press release announcing the album, Madonna framed the project around the core message of a new track titled *One Step Away*, pushing back against common misconceptions of dance music. “People think that dance music is superficial, but they’ve got it all wrong,” she wrote. “The dance floor is not just a place, it’s a threshold: A ritualistic space where movement replaces language.” The 67-year-old pop legend called this framing her “manifesto” for the new record, adding: “We must dance, celebrate, and pray with our bodies. These are things that we’ve been doing for thousands of years – they really are spiritual practices. After all, the dance floor is a ritualistic space. It’s a place where you connect with your wounds, with your fragility. To rave is an art. It’s about pushing your limits and connecting to a community of like-minded people.”

    Alongside the album announcement, Madonna also unveiled the full official album cover for *Confessions II* on Wednesday. Anticipation for the release has been building among fans for months, after a March report from *The Sun* claimed Madonna had filmed what would be “her most X-rated music video to date” at a secret UK location. Additional rumors have also swirled that the pop icon will make a surprise guest appearance alongside Sabrina Carpenter during Carpenter’s set at the second weekend of the 2026 Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival this coming Friday. Promotional posters for the new album have already begun popping up in major cities across the globe to build hype ahead of the July release.

    Beyond her new music, Madonna is also set to appear in the second season of the Emmy-winning satirical series *The Studio*, which skewers the inner workings of the Hollywood film industry. The star filmed her guest role in Venice back in March, the same city where she shot her iconic 1984 *Like a Virgin* music video. She filmed her cameo alongside Julia Garner, who was originally attached to play Madonna in a scrapped biopic about the star’s life. According to *Variety*, the upcoming second season of *The Studio* will reference the failed attempt to bring Madonna’s life story to the big screen in its storyline.

  • Trump says not thinking about extending ceasefire with Iran

    Trump says not thinking about extending ceasefire with Iran

    WASHINGTON, April 15 (Xinhua) — In a new interview that adds clarity to U.S. policy toward Iran, former President Donald Trump has stated he does not see a need to extend an existing ceasefire agreement between the two nations. Speaking to ABC News on Tuesday, Trump directly addressed questions about the future of the truce, telling reporters he has not considered extending the arrangement and does not believe such an extension would serve any necessary purpose. The comment comes amid ongoing regional tensions across the Middle East, where ceasefire agreements between major powers have faced repeated scrutiny over their ability to curb long-standing conflict and instability. The statement marks a clear shift in rhetorical positioning, closing off speculation that the U.S. could seek to prolong the current ceasefire to build toward wider diplomatic negotiations between Washington and Tehran. As regional actors continue to navigate fragile security arrangements, Trump’s remarks have eliminated immediate uncertainty about whether a temporary truce would be extended into the coming months, putting the future of the ceasefire in question as stakeholders monitor for further developments in U.S.-Iran relations.

  • Experts: Geopolitical tensions disrupting global supply chains

    Experts: Geopolitical tensions disrupting global supply chains

    Escalating geopolitical friction in the Middle East, compounded by shifting U.S. trade policies, has injected unprecedented uncertainty into global supply chains, industry leaders and policy analysts warned during a briefing at the Port of Los Angeles Monday. Top shipping executives and international relations experts say the ongoing volatility in diplomatic relations and energy markets is permanently reshaping global trade routes, raising operational costs, and forcing businesses to rewrite long-term investment strategies.

    Speaking at the event, Port of Los Angeles Executive Director Gene Seroka outlined the direct impact of strained U.S.-Iran relations and regional instability on one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints: the Strait of Hormuz. Before late February, 100 to 110 commercial vessels transited the 21-mile strait daily; today, only a handful of ships have been able to complete the passage, Seroka said. This blockage has sent ripple effects through already fragile global logistics networks that have yet to fully recover from post-pandemic disruptions.

    Jerrold Green, a senior fellow at the UCLA Burkle Center for International Relations, criticized the lack of meaningful progress in recent high-stakes U.S.-Iran negotiations. A 21-hour round of talks led by U.S. Vice President JD Vance over the weekend ended without any agreement, a outcome Green says is unsurprising given the lack of good-faith negotiation. “That is really not a negotiation. That’s a reading of terms that were not accepted,” Green said, noting that productive diplomacy requires reciprocal compromise and flexible bargaining—elements that have been entirely absent from the current diplomatic process.

    The extended disruption to Middle Eastern shipping lanes has already triggered major shifts in global trade patterns. Traffic through the Suez Canal, another core artery of global maritime commerce connecting Asia to Europe and North America, has dropped sharply as carriers reroute vessels to avoid regional risk. With fuel costs spiking and routing uncertainty growing, more cargo flows are being redirected to U.S. West Coast ports including Los Angeles, disrupting long-standing logistics workflows and creating unexpected congestion at these gateways, Seroka explained.

    When asked about the future of the Trans-Pacific Green Shipping Corridors, a 2023 initiative launched to speed up zero-carbon shipping between Asia and North America, Seroka noted that large-scale infrastructure and sustainability transformation operates on far longer timelines than volatile political cycles. “Most of this work that we do here at the port … takes years, and in some cases, decades. It’s never a straight line,” he said. While the Port of Los Angeles remains committed to advancing its decarbonization targets and long-term environmental goals, Seroka acknowledged that shifting trade policies and geopolitical upheaval have drastically altered the trajectory of these efforts. “All of that gets thrown into the soup, and it makes it taste very different than it did before,” he said, adding that rising energy costs and trade uncertainty have made the push for decarbonization far more complex than initially projected.

    The economic shockwaves of these supply chain disruptions are already being felt across Southern California, where the Port of Los Angeles serves as an economic anchor for the region. Local diesel prices have surged to between $7 and $8 per gallon, placing extreme financial pressure on the small trucking companies that form the backbone of last-mile port logistics. Beyond logistics, U.S. agricultural exports have also come under strain: soybean shipments from the U.S. to China have declined amid ongoing tariff tensions and evolving global sourcing strategies.

    Green, who has decades of on-the-ground experience working across the Middle East including Egypt, Iran, and Israel, warned that the current instability has permanently altered the global trade landscape. “It seems to me that the Middle East and therefore the world has changed permanently, and even if we try and go back to where we were, it simply won’t be possible,” he said. Prolonged regional unrest has already removed thousands of vessel transits from key global shipping lanes, creating massive uncertainty that carries direct economic costs. “There are massive uncertainties,” Green said. “And for me, a massive uncertainty is a potential loss. It’s not a good thing.”

    Green described the Port of Los Angeles as a strategic linchpin of California’s economy, which ranks as the fourth largest economy in the world by GDP. Mounting global uncertainty, he emphasized, directly translates to slower regional economic performance. Volatility in energy prices has also created whiplash for consumer and industrial trends, most notably in electric vehicle demand. “Electric cars are out of fashion … back and forth, caroming back and forth. Now they’re back because of the price of petroleum,” he said, noting that these constant shifts impact not just U.S. domestic industries, but consumers in every country across the globe.

    Persistent policy and geopolitical uncertainty has also put a damper on business planning across all sectors tied to trade, Seroka added. Hiring at port-related businesses has remained soft for more than 12 months, and while inflation has not spun out of control, it remains above target levels, pushing corporations to adopt a far more cautious approach to capital investment. Even the steady U.S. consumer spending that has propped up economic growth in recent months may not hold, Seroka warned: “The American consumer seems to be so consistent in their buying patterns. At some point, I would think that’s going to tip, too.”

    Green echoed these concerns, noting that the unexpected outbreak of conflict in the Middle East underscores the fundamental fragility of long-term economic planning in today’s geopolitical climate. “This war came out of nowhere. Nobody predicted it, nobody expected it, and it was a body blow,” he said. Reiterating the core risk of prolonged uncertainty, he added: “There are massive uncertainties … and massive uncertainty is a potential loss.”

  • Tech experts call for cooperation on AI safety guardrails

    Tech experts call for cooperation on AI safety guardrails

    As artificial intelligence continues to reshape nearly every sector of the global economy, leading technology experts and researchers are issuing a urgent call for the world’s two largest AI powers, the United States and China, to set aside geopolitical rivalry and collaborate on the development of shared safety and ethical frameworks for advanced AI development. Experts warn that a fragmented, competition-first approach to AI regulation would carry severe risks for all nations, undermining the technology’s transformative benefits while amplifying unaddressed safety hazards.

    Speaking with China Daily on the sidelines of the recent HumanX conference held in San Francisco, Silicon Valley entrepreneur Nand Mulchandani — whose tech startups have been acquired by industry giants including Oracle, VMware and Cisco — emphasized that consistent, global industry standards are a non-negotiable foundation for AI to scale safely and deliver widespread public benefit.

    “A uniform set of standards works for every nation, because it gives all countries access to the benefits that come from commoditized, scalable technology, systems and products,” Mulchandani explained. He drew on decades of global telecommunications history to illustrate the power of interoperable, shared standards, pointing to international mobile roaming as a model for what cross-border cooperation can achieve.

    “Roaming works seamlessly for consumers across the globe precisely because we agreed on common protocols and technology standards decades ago,” he said. “A uniform set of technical rules that work everywhere creates tangible benefits for end users everywhere. Just as open, flat architectural standards fueled the global growth of the internet that lifted all participants, a divided approach to AI would leave everyone worse off. If the U.S. and China move forward with incompatible, separate AI standards, that would be a collective failure — a lose-lose outcome for the entire world.”

    Mulchandani acknowledged the inherent tension between national competitive interests and global collective good, noting that the two powers will need to navigate a nuanced balance between competition and cooperation. “The U.S. and China have to figure out where competitive dynamics fit and where cooperative goals take priority — they will have areas of healthy competition, and they will also have clear areas where collaboration serves everyone,” he added.

    His call echoes a recent commentary from a group of global AI researchers published by the Brookings Institution, which urged the two leading AI superpowers to abandon zero-sum geopolitical thinking and prioritize joint work on AI safety guardrails. The researchers argued that fixating on gaining unilateral national advantage obscures the larger shared risks and opportunities of advanced AI development.

    “Instead of obsessing over which country is ahead, or what the U.S. can do to slow China’s AI progress, American policymakers need to accept a simple reality: the United States and China will advance alongside each other at the cutting edge of AI technology for the foreseeable future,” the researchers wrote. “Neither side will gain a permanent, decisive advantage over the other.”

    The researchers project that top AI laboratories in both countries will make parallel progress toward advanced agentic AI systems and artificial general intelligence (AGI) in coming years, making early coordination on safety measures even more urgent to prevent unregulated, high-risk development.

    Donald Lewis, non-resident fellow at the Center for China and Globalization, noted that even amid ongoing broader diplomatic tensions between the two nations, the structural groundwork for meaningful AI cooperation is already in place. Lewis pointed to decades of people-to-people and industry ties between Silicon Valley and Chinese technology firms as a solid foundation to build collaborative efforts on AI.

    “I believe there are very strong prospects for U.S.-China collaboration on AI development over the next several years, if not decades,” Lewis told China Daily. “Even during the Trump administration, policymakers floated the realistic, promising idea of a US-China G2 for key strategic sectors — and strategic AI is one area where that framework makes a great deal of sense.”

    Lewis highlighted AI-driven climate and energy innovation as an especially promising area for early joint work, noting that the two countries are the undisputed global leaders in AI research and development, with all other nations falling far behind in investment and capability. “The U.S. and China are the primary global competitors in the fast-expanding AI ecosystem, but that leadership also gives them a unique responsibility to collaborate for global public good,” Lewis said. “AI should be the next chapter in what can be a mutually fruitful cooperation between the two powers that benefits the entire world.”

  • Go on patrol with the Canadian Rangers across the frozen Arctic

    Go on patrol with the Canadian Rangers across the frozen Arctic

    Beneath the endless pale blue sky that stretches over a vast, frozen wilderness, a small group of Canadian Rangers has been making its way across one of the harshest environments on Earth. On the final stretch of a landmark journey through Canada’s remote far north, a BBC reporting team was granted rare access to accompany these dedicated servicemembers as they carry out one of the country’s most unique sovereignty missions. For decades, the Canadian Rangers have served as the eyes and ears of the nation in the Arctic, a sparsely populated region where icy conditions, subzero temperatures, and vast uninhabited expanses make regular government presence a constant challenge. This particular trek stands out as a historic effort to reaffirm Canada’s territorial claim in a region that has grown increasingly strategically important as climate change opens up Arctic waterways to new shipping lanes and natural resource exploration. Walking mile after mile across snow-covered tundra and frozen riverbeds, the Rangers demonstrate the steady commitment Canada maintains to its northern borders. The accompanying BBC journalists documented firsthand the harsh realities of Arctic patrol work, from battling wind chills that can drop to dangerous negative temperatures to navigating terrain that shifts beneath the snow with each changing season. What emerges from the journey is a portrait of quiet resilience, as these part-time military personnel — many of whom are local Indigenous residents with deep knowledge of the Arctic landscape — work to uphold Canadian sovereignty while connecting with scattered remote communities across the region. The final leg of the trek brought the patrol and their BBC guests through areas that see almost no outside visitors, highlighting just how critical the Ranger presence is to maintaining Canada’s foothold in its northernmost territories amid growing regional and global interest in the Arctic’s future.