标签: Europe

欧洲

  • Artists threaten legal action against Venice Biennale over inclusion in visitors’ ballot

    Artists threaten legal action against Venice Biennale over inclusion in visitors’ ballot

    The 2025 edition of the Venice Biennale, one of the world’s most prestigious contemporary art events, has devolved into the most contentious iteration in recent decades, as more than 100 participating artists, curators and pavilion commissioners are pushing forward with legal threats over a flawed visitor-voted award system that replaced traditional jury-selected Golden Lion prizes. Tensions erupted at the event even before its public opening on May 9, when the entire panel of jurors stepped down in a dramatic act of political protest, citing International Criminal Court investigations into alleged crimes against humanity linked to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. The jury’s resignation forced Biennale organizers to scrap the iconic Golden Lion awards and implement a last-minute replacement: public voting by visitors at the show’s two core venues, the Giardini and Arsenale, to select winners in two categories — best national pavilion, and best participant in the central exhibition *In Minor Keys*, curated per the vision of the late curator Koyo Kouoh. Winners of the visitor-voted awards are scheduled to be announced on the Biennale’s closing day, November 22. In the lead-up to the public opening, intense protests also unfolded outside the Russian and Israeli national pavilions during the press preview week, amplifying the political friction that has defined this year’s event. On Wednesday, the protesting artists published an open letter leveling sharp criticism at the replacement voting process, arguing it lacks basic transparency and accountability. The group first requested that their names be removed from the public ballot back on May 20, but say Biennale leadership failed to respond to their initial demand, prompting them to initiate formal pre-litigation procedures. As of the letter’s publication, the coalition includes roughly 70 artists taking part in the central exhibition and organizers from nearly 40 national pavilions. High-profile participants backing the demand include the national pavilions of Iceland, Norway and Denmark — all of which have previously been at the forefront of calls to bar Russia from the Biennale, following Moscow’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Prominent Austrian artist Florentina Holzinger, whose acclaimed installation using recycled wastewater from portable toilets outside the Austrian Pavilion has become one of the most talked-about works of this year’s show, is also among the signatories. In its official response to the coalition’s demands, the Biennale circulated a May 28 letter clarifying that it would retain all names on the public ballot “to guarantee all visitors have the freedom of expression.” However, organizers confirmed that none of the artists who requested removal would actually be eligible to win the awards. The protesting coalition dismissed this compromise as meaningless, calling the arrangement a “waste of time” that forces visitors to cast votes that will never be counted toward final results.

  • UK lawmaker says she is suing Elon Musk’s company over fake Grok bikini images

    UK lawmaker says she is suing Elon Musk’s company over fake Grok bikini images

    LONDON — A landmark legal challenge targeting artificial intelligence accountability has emerged in the United Kingdom, as a sitting Labour Party legislator has launched a privacy invasion lawsuit against Elon Musk’s AI development firm xAI over deepfake explicit images generated without her consent by the company’s Grok chatbot.

    Jess Asato, who serves in the UK parliament for the governing party, revealed Thursday that the unauthorized deepfake content was produced in January, shortly after she publicly spoke out against the growing proliferation of non-consensual deepfake pornography across digital platforms. According to Asato’s account, an anonymous party leveraged Grok’s image generation capabilities to create fake photos of her wearing a bikini that were never shot or authorized by her.

    The formal legal claim was submitted to London’s High Court this week, with Asato arguing that xAI violated the UK Data Protection Act through the misuse of her private personal information. Beyond seeking monetary damages for the harm she has endured, the lawmaker has a larger strategic goal: to establish a binding legal precedent that holds AI developers legally responsible for dangerous design flaws in their systems that enable harmful misuse.

    In a statement explaining her decision to pursue legal action, Asato drew a parallel between the online violation and a physical offense. “Nobody would be able to walk up to me in the street and strip me and put me in a bikini, and I don’t see why anybody should be able to do that to me online, because the feeling, while it is not quite the same, is very similar,” she said. “It is like somebody has digitally stripped me without my consent.”

    Asato also said she encourages other people who have suffered similar harm from AI-generated non-consensual deepfakes to join her legal action, framing the case as a broader fight for digital privacy safety.

    This lawsuit comes amid a growing global backlash against the spread of non-consensual deepfake pornography, which has triggered widespread calls for tighter regulation of AI tools. Back in January, after the incident involving Asato drew public attention and international outcry, xAI announced it would update Grok’s policies to ban users from editing images of real people to remove clothing.

    The UK passed a national law last year that explicitly criminalizes the creation or solicitation of non-consensual deepfake images of adults, but Asato argues that existing accountability frameworks are incomplete. Even after companies patch dangerous flaws in their AI systems, she notes, irreversible harm has already been done to victims of misuse.

    “Once the damage is done, the damage is done,” Asato said. “If you think about any other products, like a car, for example, that might have been manufactured with a fault, it doesn’t matter if, you know, the cars get recalled and the faults are fixed and no more harm is done.” Companies must still be held responsible for the harm their flawed products caused before the fix, she argues.

    As of Thursday, xAI had not issued any immediate public response to requests for comment on the new lawsuit.

  • Dutch police detain 4 suspects in probe into men who drugged, abused women they knew

    Dutch police detain 4 suspects in probe into men who drugged, abused women they knew

    THE HAGUE, Netherlands – Dutch law enforcement has taken four men into custody as part of a sweeping probe into allegations of systematic drug-facilitated sexual assault, where perpetrators allegedly targeted women they knew, recorded the abuse, and circulated graphic footage among private online groups. The investigation carries striking parallels to the high-profile Gisèle Pelicot abuse case that shocked France late last year.

  • Ukraine accused of killing four in occupied Crimea

    Ukraine accused of killing four in occupied Crimea

    Escalating cross-border strikes have sent fatalities climbing across Russian-occupied Ukrainian territories and mainland Russia, marking a sharp intensification of hostilities three months into the fifth year of Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The latest outbreak of violence began with a series of Ukrainian strikes on the Russian-annexed Crimean Peninsula, where Russian-installed local authorities confirmed at least four civilian and personnel deaths across two separate attack sites.

    In the regional capital of Simferopol, one strike targeting what local officials described as non-residential infrastructure left three people dead and seven others injured. This incident marks the first recorded fatal Ukrainian attack on Simferopol since Russia illegally occupied and annexed the peninsula from Ukraine in 2014, a move ordered directly by Russian President Vladimir Putin. A second attack targeted a commuter train en route to Kerch, killing one additional passenger and wounding three more, according to the Moscow-appointed head of Crimea.

    As of publication, Ukrainian officials have not issued any official comment on the Crimean strikes. This wave of attacks marks the third consecutive day that Ukrainian forces have been accused of targeting transport and infrastructure in Russian-occupied Ukrainian territories. In addition to its strikes on occupied Crimea, Kyiv has steadily expanded the scope and frequency of its long-range strikes deep inside Russian territory over recent weeks.

    The most high-profile of these recent strikes came on Wednesday, just hours before the official opening of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Russia’s flagship annual economic event designed to draw foreign investment into the country. Once known as the “Russian Davos,” the forum drew high-profile Western political and business delegations before Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed that Ukrainian drones struck multiple targets near St. Petersburg, including an oil terminal and a naval facility in Kronstadt, the primary outpost of Russia’s Baltic Fleet. A separate Russian-installed official in occupied Donetsk reported that a drone strike on a passenger bus in the region killed seven civilians the same day.

    Over the four years since Russia launched its full-scale invasion, Ukraine has rapidly expanded and developed its domestic defense industry, allowing it to produce enough long-range drones and other precision weapons to regularly strike targets deep inside Russian and Russian-occupied territory. Ukrainian military strategy prioritizes strikes on energy and oil infrastructure, which Kyiv views as critical to sustaining Russia’s war effort. This escalation in Ukrainian long-range strikes has been matched by continued heavy Russian strikes across Ukrainian population centers, which have resulted in consistent civilian casualties. On Monday alone, combined Russian missile and drone strikes across multiple Ukrainian cities killed at least 22 civilian people.

    Moscow has continued to frame its illegal 2014 annexation of Crimea as a permanent territorial acquisition, a claim rejected by the vast majority of the international community and UN member states. Ukraine has repeatedly stated it aims to fully liberate all occupied territories, including Crimea, as a core condition of any lasting peace deal.

  • Man City consider legal action after Haaland claim

    Man City consider legal action after Haaland claim

    As Real Madrid prepares to hold its first contested presidential election in two decades this Sunday, a bold pledge from an underdog candidate to pry two star players from English champions Manchester City has sparked a major cross-club controversy, putting transfer politics at the center of the club’s leadership race.

    Enrique Riquelme, a 37-year-old renewable energy tycoon who is challenging long-time incumbent Florentino Perez for the club’s top job, made headlines during a televised appearance Wednesday when he unveiled a Real Madrid jersey printed with star striker Erling Haaland’s name. Riquelme claimed Haaland, who scored twice against Real Madrid during their three Champions League matches last season, has a release clause in his City contract and wants to move to the Spanish capital, promising “if I become president, he will play for Real Madrid.” He followed that announcement with a second pledge to sign City’s star midfielder Rodri, adding “he is a great player, in a position where Madrid need to strengthen. We have spoken to his agent. We have to respect his club, but if I’m president he will play for Madrid. I will do everything possible.”

    The claims were immediately met with firm denials from all parties connected to Manchester City and Haaland. In a joint statement, Haaland’s father Alfie Inge Haaland and his agent Rafaela Pimenta called the rumors “all very entertaining but not true” and closed by wishing both candidates well in the election. Manchester City followed with an even stronger rebuke, confirming that no such release clause exists and that a transfer is completely out of the question. “The stories which have emerged from Spain regarding the future of Erling Haaland are untrue. There is no chance of this happening and there is no contractual clause to enable it,” the club said in its official statement. The Premier League side also confirmed it is evaluating legal options over the unauthorized use of Haaland’s image in Riquelme’s campaign stunt.

    The controversial transfer pledge comes as Riquelme wages an uphill campaign against Perez, who has led Real Madrid since 2009 and held the presidency for 20 years total without facing any challenger until this year’s vote. Riquelme launched his bid after two back-to-back trophy-less seasons for the La Liga giant, running on an aggressive populist platform that includes major fan perks: he has promised to build a dedicated member’s leisure complex near the club’s training ground with swimming pools, padel courts and a basketball arena, and pledged to cut annual membership fees by up to 50% if the club fails to win the Champions League next season. He has also publicly opposed Perez’s reported plan to hire Jose Mourinho as the next first-team manager, with his campaign hinting that former Liverpool boss Jurgen Klopp is his top target for the role.

    Perez, for his part, has framed his campaign around fixing last season’s underperformance and has dismissed Riquelme’s superstar transfer promises as economically unfeasible and unrealistic. The 79-year-old construction magnate and former city councilor has acknowledged the club’s underwhelming results in the last two seasons, blaming a congested schedule caused by the Club World Cup, which forced the team to skip pre-season preparation, and an unprecedented injury crisis that saw nearly 30 first-team players sidelined in the first half of the campaign. He has already reached pre-agreements to sign two high-profile defenders, Liverpool’s Ibrahima Konate and Inter Milan’s Denzel Dumfries, once he secures re-election, and pledged to end internal squad conflict that disrupted the second half of the most recent season.

    Rodri, the 29-year-old Spanish midfield star whose name has also been dragged into the election campaign, addressed the rumors last month, saying he will finalize his future plans after this summer’s World Cup. “When a player is approaching the final stage of his contract, it’s normal for names to be mentioned,” he said. “I’m very calm, I know exactly where I stand, and I’ll tell you that perhaps if there hadn’t been a World Cup, things might be different now.”

    Founded as a member-owned club, Real Madrid’s presidential election gives nearly 100,000 eligible voting members the chance to shape the future of one of the world’s most valuable sports franchises. Perez called the election early this year to shore up his mandate after growing fan discontent over on-field results at the Santiago Bernabeu, and he remains the heavy favorite to win another term, even as the race has devolved into repeated public attacks between the two camps. During Riquelme’s recent appearance on popular Spanish variety show *El Hormiguero*, Perez’s campaign bought ad time to formally announce Mourinho’s pending appointment and call for voters to back the incumbent.

    Club legends are split along the two campaigns: the majority of former stars, including Karim Benzema, Casemiro and Roberto Carlos, have lined up behind Perez, while former captains Iker Casillas and Fernando Hierro have backed Riquelme’s challenge. Perez first won the Real Madrid presidency in 2000 on a similar promise of signing global superstars, when his pledge to bring Barcelona icon Luis Figo to the club secured his upset victory over incumbent Lorenzo Sanz, launching the iconic ‘Galacticos’ era that saw the club sign Zinedine Zidane, Ronaldo, David Beckham and Michael Owen in consecutive summers. He resigned in 2006 amid poor results, but returned unopposed to the presidency in 2009, holding power ever since until this year’s challenge.

  • A higher ceiling than Messi? What next for Lamine Yamal?

    A higher ceiling than Messi? What next for Lamine Yamal?

    As the 2026 FIFA World Cup approaches, all eyes in global football are turning to 18-year-old Spanish phenom Lamine Yamal, a teenage talent already being hailed as the next generational great of the game – even by the greatest to ever play the sport.

    During a World Cup commercial event, Lionel Messi was asked to name the standout young player of the new era, and he left no room for debate. “It would be Lamine. No doubt about it: for me, he is the best,” Messi said. Just one week later, when US broadcaster CBS asked Yamal point-blank if Spain would lift the World Cup trophy, the teenager smiled and gave a confident one-word answer: “Yes.”

    What makes Yamal’s ascent genuinely extraordinary is not just the avalanche of praise from football royalty that has landed on his shoulders before his 19th birthday. It is the remarkable poise and self-awareness with which he carries that weight, and how clearly he has already carved out his own identity, both as a footballer and a public figure.

    At 18 years old, Yamal already has a resume most senior players can only dream of: he has featured in a UEFA Champions League semi-final, won the 2024 European Championship with Spain, and inherited Barcelona’s iconic number 10 shirt – the same number Messi wore for nearly 15 years at Camp Nou. While his precocity is staggering, the most striking trait of his game and his character is his unshakable serenity under pressure.

    Comparisons to Messi have followed Yamal throughout his rise, whether he seeks them out or not. Both are left-footed players with the same deceptive dribbling intelligence that makes the most challenging on-field moves look effortless. In fact, many experts argue Yamal has already had a far greater impact at Barcelona at 18 than Messi did at the same age, though any prediction that he will ultimately match the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner’s legacy remains far too early to make.

    One telling statistic, however, highlights just how far Yamal has already come: by his 18th birthday, he had already made 151 appearances for Barcelona’s first team. By the time Messi turned 19 in June 2006, he had only notched 41 top-flight appearances for the Catalan club.

    Football greats who have seen both players develop have been quick to draw a clear lineage between the two generations. Ronaldinho, who played alongside a young Messi at the start of Barcelona’s golden era and won the Champions League with him, drew the line directly in comments to FIFA’s website in March. “Messi and I made history, and now it is Lamine Yamal’s turn. What he has already shown at such a young age is extraordinary,” the Brazilian legend said.

    Former Manchester United defender Rio Ferdinand went even further when asked if Yamal is already a better player at the same age than Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo were. Ferdinand replied bluntly on ESPN: “Yes. His potential or ceiling might be better than theirs. The body of work at 17 years old – no-one has done it. Pele may have, but I didn’t see Pele.”

    Spain national team head coach Luis de la Fuente, who has watched Yamal progress through the country’s youth age groups, says what sets the teenager apart goes far beyond raw talent. “He is a player blessed by God. Football geniuses have something special, and he has it,” De la Fuente said. “You can immediately see those kinds of footballers who are touched by magic that says: you are going to be special.”

    Barcelona manager Hansi Flick, who works with Yamal in training every day and has watched him perform on the biggest club stages all season, echoes that praise. “He is special, he is a genius. In the big matches, he shows up. Players do not usually reach this level of maturity until they are 24 or 25 years old. If this kind of talent only comes every half-century, I am glad it is for Barcelona,” Flick said.

    What truly separates Yamal from the dozens of previous “next Messis” tipped for stardom at Barcelona over the past two decades is his deliberate rejection of trying to fill anyone else’s shoes. While he openly admires Messi, he holds a quiet, unshakable determination to forge his own path. “For me, Messi is the greatest football player in history. He is a legend and I do not find myself worthy of being compared to him,” Yamal said. “I do not want to be Messi and he knows it. I want to follow my own path.”

    The same mindset applies when comparisons to Ronaldo are raised. Yamal does not dismiss either the comparisons or the legendary legacy of the five-time Ballon d’Or winner – he simply refuses to structure his own ambition around matching anyone else. “It is best not to compare yourself to anyone,” he said at an awards ceremony. “Players like Cristiano Ronaldo did what they did because they wanted to be themselves. I try to be me, play my game, and get people to recognise me for being Lamine.”

    Barcelona’s academy has produced no shortage of young talents anointed as the next great hope, only for many to fade under the weight of expectations: Giovani dos Santos, Gerard Deulofeu, Bojan Krkic, Ansu Fati, and Munir El Haddadi are just a few of the prospects who carried the “next Messi” label at one point or another. Yamal, by contrast, lets the media and fans debate his potential while he focuses on playing, even as speculation about a future Ballon d’Or win has followed him since he was 16 years old.

    He says he plays to bring joy to fans, and wants young children to aspire to be like him – not like Messi or Ronaldo. “I am not thinking about the Ballon d’Or. I want to enjoy myself and win with Barca and the national team,” he said. “Pressure does not exist, it is an excuse. If you just think about enjoying yourself and having fun, there is no pressure.”

    That confidence in his own trajectory is nothing new to the coaches who spotted his talent early. Inocente Diaz, one of Yamal’s youth coaches at Barcelona’s famed La Masia academy, made a bold prediction as far back as 2025. “He is even better than Messi,” Diaz told Spanish newspaper Sport. “He possesses a unique blend of physical attributes reminiscent of both Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo. In six years, he will win the Ballon d’Or.”

    For Yamal himself, the immediate target is clear: the 2026 World Cup. He has already laid out his ambitions for the tournament, where he will be the centerpiece of a Spanish squad ranked among the pre-tournament favorites. “I have always imagined playing in a World Cup, seeing my mother in the stands. I hope I can win it,” he said.

    What many casual observers have missed about Yamal’s game, which La Masia coaches recognized long before the rest of the world, is his evolving tactical profile. While he is officially listed as a winger who terrorizes opposing full-backs from the left flank with elite dribbling numbers, Yamal says his childhood approach to the game was far more focused on football intelligence than individual skill. “When I was small I never dribbled much or got past many opponents. I scored a lot of goals, ran a lot, but above all I had very good vision of the game,” he explained. “I focused on what Messi did because he gave different passes – passes that led to goals. And I looked at Modric, who passed with the outside of his foot. That seemed more interesting to me than dribbling, because it is more about the mind.”

    That fascination with a midfielder renowned for his spatial awareness and vision, rather than a dynamic winger, hints at the evolutionary path Yamal is already walking. Over the past two seasons, tactical data has shown Yamal increasingly drifting into central areas of the pitch, operating as a second playmaker as often as he stays wide on the flank. That shift mirrors the transition Messi made early in his career, when he moved from the right wing to the false nine position at the center of Barcelona’s attack, a shift that turned him into the greatest player of his generation. It took Messi more than a decade to complete that transition – Yamal may make the move far earlier.

    Julen Guerrero, who worked with Yamal in Spain’s youth system, says he is not surprised by the teenager’s tactical evolution. “Of course I can picture him as a false nine,” Guerrero said. “But it is a less comfortable position because teams block the centre more, there are fewer spaces, you have to be more patient. But he is very intelligent. He knows how to move.”

    As the 2026 World Cup kicks off, Yamal will be just 18 years old – he will not turn 19 until the day before the tournament’s first semi-final. Spain arrives at the competition as one of the title favorites, built around the teenage talent who has already proven he is far more than just the next Messi. He is Lamine Yamal – and he is ready to write his own story on the world’s biggest football stage.

  • How Ukraine-Russia tension hangs over French Open semi-finals

    How Ukraine-Russia tension hangs over French Open semi-finals

    The 2026 French Open women’s singles draw has already delivered a string of stunning upsets and historic breakthroughs, but all eyes will turn to a highly anticipated semi-final match on Thursday that carries far more stakes than just a spot in a Grand Slam final. With Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine entering its fifth year, the showdown between Ukraine’s Marta Kostyuk and Russia’s teen star Mirra Andreeva will play out against the unavoidable, weighty backdrop of ongoing armed conflict between their home nations.

    Kostyuk, the 23-year-old 15th seed, has emerged as one of the most vocal Ukrainian athlete advocates since the 2022 invasion, consistently using her platform as a top tennis player to keep global attention focused on the human cost of the war. Just last week, she revealed that a Russian missile strike hit a building less than 100 meters from her family’s home in Kyiv during a renewed wave of attacks on the Ukrainian capital. Following her hard-fought quarter-final win over fellow Ukrainian Elina Svitolina, Kostyuk reiterated that speaking out about the war is the most critical contribution she can make amid the crisis.

    “The biggest thing I can do is sit here and talk about [the war] so more people can find out about it and don’t get used to this terrible life,” she told reporters.

    Her opponent, 19-year-old eighth seed Andreeva, has repeatedly declined to engage with questions about the conflict, sticking to that stance again in pre-match press conferences ahead of Thursday’s semi-final. This is Andreeva’s second consecutive appearance in the French Open semi-finals, and she says she is focused solely on executing her game plan, regardless of who stands across the net.

    “It doesn’t matter who I play. I really try to play against the ball that is coming at me,” Andreeva said. “It doesn’t matter to me who I’m playing against, so I’m trying to really focus on the game and on the gameplan that I have to use on the court.”

    This match marks the second meeting between Kostyuk and Andreeva in just over a month. The pair faced off in the Madrid Open final last month, where Kostyuk claimed a 6-3 7-5 victory to win the biggest title of her professional career. Following that match, the two players did not share the customary post-match handshake, a policy adopted by all Ukrainian tennis players against competitors from Russia and Belarus (a Russian ally that backed the invasion) that will remain in place at Roland Garros.

    If Kostyuk defeats Andreeva to extend her 17-match clay-court winning streak to 18, she will face a second Russian player, 22-year-old Diana Shnaider, in Saturday’s final. Shnaider earned her spot in her first ever Grand Slam semi-final after pulling off one of the biggest upsets of the tournament, knocking out Belarusian world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka, who has publicly condemned the invasion.

    Shnaider has already faced her own share of controversy at this year’s tournament. Before her third-round match against Ukrainian player Oleksandra Oliynykova, Oliynykova publicly accused Shnaider of supporting the invasion, citing Shnaider’s decision to compete in a St. Petersburg exhibition event sponsored by Gazprom, Russia’s state-owned energy giant. Oliynykova compared participating in the event to playing in a tournament organized by Nazi Germany during World War II.

    Shnaider defended her choice to compete in the event, noting it was her only opportunity in 2026 to play in front of her family in Russia. Like Andreeva, she has declined to comment publicly on the war, a choice that has drawn sharp criticism from Kostyuk.

    “They are all grown-ups. They know what they’re talking about. They know what’s going on. They have phones. They have Instagram. They have news. They are clearly aware of what’s going on,” Kostyuk told reporters. “I don’t know how you can sleep at night peacefully when you know that this is going on and you have nothing to say about it.”

    For Kostyuk, every win she earns at Roland Garros is a tribute to her war-torn home nation. Though she acknowledges the privilege of building her career away from the active conflict zone, she says the ongoing suffering of Ukrainians back home is her core source of motivation to keep competing and winning.

    Former world No. 5 Slovakian player Daniela Hantuchova, speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live, says the pressure and adversity faced by players from conflict-affected regions in Eastern Europe creates a unique drive to succeed.

    “This desire comes from there being no other options, when you have war behind your courtyard and you know sport in particular is the only way to escape that,” Hantuchova said. “You don’t question anything you are told to do to get where you want. The starting point creates this incredible hunger and willingness to do whatever it takes.”

    In the other semi-final, Shnaider will face unseeded Polish qualifier Maja Chwalinska, who has continued her Cinderella run through the draw after entering the tournament ranked outside the world’s top 100. Remarkably, all four 2026 French Open women’s semi-finalists hail from Eastern or Central Europe, each carrying their own personal story of resilience amid extraordinary pressure. All four players have outperformed pre-tournament expectations in a wide-open draw that lacked many of the tour’s top contenders.

    Regardless of how the semi-finals unfold, Saturday’s final will crown a first-time Grand Slam singles champion, a result that very few tennis pundits or fans predicted at the start of the tournament two weeks ago. The question remaining is not just who will hold the trophy, but how the weight of geopolitical conflict will shape one of the most politically charged matches in recent Grand Slam history.

  • Ahead of papal visit, Spain pushes forward with reparations for church sex abuse victims

    Ahead of papal visit, Spain pushes forward with reparations for church sex abuse victims

    MADRID – More than half a century after she endured repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a Marist priest as an 8-year-old catechism student in Valladolid, northern Spain, Paula Alonso-Pimentel is finally pushing for accountability. Decades of buried trauma, followed by years of unmet demands for justice, have led her to this moment: a new joint reparations program between the Spanish government and the country’s Catholic bishops that aims to address long-unpunished abuse cases involving deceased or statute-barred perpetrators. For a nation that has lagged far behind other Western countries in confronting the clerical abuse crisis entrenched within its once-dominant Catholic institutions, this launch marks an unprecedented new chapter in a decades-long reckoning.

    Spain’s journey to this reparations framework began in 2018, when leading national newspaper El País published a searchable public database of alleged clergy sexual abuse cases, pulling back the curtain on a crisis the Catholic Church had hidden for generations. As public outrage mounted, Spain’s Parliament tasked the national ombudsman with conducting a full independent investigation. The resulting 2023 report, an 800-page exhaustive assessment, delivered a damning conclusion: based on a representative survey of 8,000 adults, the report estimated hundreds of thousands of people across Spain had experienced sexual abuse at the hands of Catholic clergy over the course of decades. The Spanish Bishops Conference immediately pushed back against the estimate, releasing its own internal count that documented just 728 identified abusive priests since 1945. Church leaders noted that 60% of those accused abusers were already deceased, and most of the alleged crimes occurred before 1990, placing them far outside the window for criminal prosecution.

    In 2024, the Spanish government threatened to mandate church-backed compensation, arguing the Church had consistently minimized the scope of the crisis. The bishops responded by launching their own unilateral victim assistance program, which critics quickly dismissed as toothless: run entirely by the Church, it lacked independent oversight, making it impossible to ensure fair outcomes for survivors. For many victims including Alonso-Pimentel, the idea of seeking compensation from the same institution that enabled and covered up their abuse was unacceptable. “You can’t be a judge and a jury in your own case,” Alonso-Pimentel put it, a sentiment shared by hundreds of other survivors who avoided the Church’s in-house process.

    The new joint reparations program, approved by both the bishops conference and the government months ahead of Pope Leo XIV’s upcoming visit to Spain, was designed to address that core criticism. Under the new framework, claims are first reviewed by an independent panel of experts convened by the national ombudsman, which proposes a package of compensation that may include symbolic recognition, psychological support, or financial payouts. The Church then reviews the proposal, and if no agreement can be reached, the case moves to a joint committee with representation from the Church, the ombudsman’s office, and victim advocacy groups. If the committee deadlocks, the ombudsman – an independent state official – retains final say over payout decisions, a landmark shift that gives government, not Church leaders, the final word on compensation. Survivors have exactly one year to submit claims, and as of the latest update, 420 people have already filed applications.

    For the Vatican, the program aligns with Pope Leo XIV’s recent public commitments to addressing clerical abuse. In his first encyclical, Leo wrote that listening to abuse survivors requires explicit acknowledgment of harm and delivery of “just reparation.” Josetxo Vera, communications director for the Spanish Bishops Conference, framed the new program as a natural expansion of the Church’s ongoing work to address past harm, while emphasizing that the bishops do not view the crisis as systemic within the Spanish Church. “We believe that, indeed, human nature is flawed, that it has a propensity for evil, and that it needs a great deal of reconciliation and forgiveness,” Vera said. “But I can’t say that it’s a systemic issue. We are part of this society. We share some of its virtues, and we also share some of its vices and crimes.” The conference has already paid out roughly 2 million euros ($2.3 million) to survivors through its earlier internal program, and leaders say they recognize why many survivors were uncomfortable engaging directly with the Church.

    Even with these reforms, the program faces widespread criticism from survivors and advocacy groups, who warn it retains critical structural weaknesses. A core point of contention is the one-year application window, which many argue is too short for survivors who have spent decades hiding their trauma to come forward. Critics also note the program lacks a standardized compensation matrix that ties payout amounts to the severity of abuse, meaning outcomes could be inconsistent across cases. Most alarmingly for opponents, the program is not legally binding, leaving no formal recourse for survivors who disagree with final decisions.

    Anne Barrett Doyle, co-director of Bishop Accountability, a U.S.-based nonprofit that tracks global clerical abuse cases and institutional cover-ups, called the new protocol “quite fragile.” “It has a very short time frame. It has no matrix to establish minimum awards for various categories of injuries,” she noted. “So will it be fair? Will it be consistent?”

    Those doubts are echoed by Spanish survivor activist Miguel Hurtado, who has spoken publicly about his own abuse at the hands of a monk at the iconic Montserrat Abbey, a historic Benedictine monastery outside Barcelona. As a 16-year-old Boy Scout in a group led by monk Andreu Soler more than 20 years ago, Hurtado says he was molested by Soler. He says the monastery immediately pressured his parents to not report the abuse to law enforcement, and decades later, after an independent 2019 report acknowledged Soler had abused multiple victims over decades, the monastery still refused to accept formal responsibility for compensation, arguing all claims were time-barred under criminal and civil law. Hurtado says he is disappointed that Pope Leo XIV will still visit the Montserrat Abbey during his trip, despite his detailed submission of the allegations to Vatican and church authorities. Like many other survivors, he fears the new reparations program will ultimately fail to deliver meaningful justice. “The problem is that it’s built on sand,” Hurtado said.

    For her part, Alonso-Pimentel shares that skepticism, but remains cautiously hopeful that the new independent model will deliver the accountability she has chased for 50 years. She declined to participate in the Church’s earlier internal program, distrustful of an institution that enabled her abuse and ignored her claims for decades. When she reached out to the Marist order in Valladolid after Pope Francis’ 2019 global summit on clerical abuse, all she received was the name of her abuser, with no further accountability. Now, she says she will file her claim under the new program no matter what, but is waiting to see if the process lives up to its promises. “It must cost them, the Church,” she said. “It must cost them because this cannot come for free. It cannot be that they can continue doing it without paying a huge price.”

  • Ukraine’s drone strikes set a gloomy tone for Putin’s economic showcase

    Ukraine’s drone strikes set a gloomy tone for Putin’s economic showcase

    In a striking development that overshadowed the kickoff of Russia’s high-profile annual economic gathering, two coordinated Ukrainian drone attacks targeted key infrastructure in St. Petersburg just hours before the opening of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, a signature event where President Vladimir Putin planned to showcase Russia’s claimed economic resilience to global attendees.

    The strikes — one that ignited a large blaze at a city oil terminal and another that hit the historic Kronstadt naval base on a Gulf of Finland island just off St. Petersburg’s coast — delivered another public embarrassment for the Kremlin, which has spent months framing the two-year full-scale invasion of Ukraine as a distant conflict that does not disrupt ordinary Russian life or key national events. Located just 9 miles from the forum’s main venue, the oil terminal strike sent a thick black plume of smoke visible across the St. Petersburg skyline, setting a somber tone for the event that Putin, a St. Petersburg native, was set to address Thursday.

    The attacks underscore a worrying new reality for the Kremlin: Ukraine’s steadily improving drone capabilities now allow it to strike deep within Russian territory, even at heavily protected sites of enormous symbolic importance to the Russian state. Kronstadt, the historic home of Russia’s Baltic Fleet founded alongside St. Petersburg by Peter the Great, remains a landmark of Russian naval heritage despite most of the fleet’s relocation to the Kaliningrad exclave. This is not an isolated incident: in May, Putin ordered a scaled-back version of Moscow’s annual Victory Day military parade over drone strike fears, and just days later, a large drone assault on Moscow suburbs killed three people, confirming the capital’s vulnerability too. In response to the St. Petersburg strikes, local authorities disrupted cellular internet service in an effort to disrupt drone guidance systems, and dozens of flights arriving and departing from the city’s main airport were delayed or rerouted to other airports.

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov defended Moscow’s response, saying Russian forces were continuing offensive operations inside Ukraine specifically to prevent further such strikes on Russian territory. He confirmed that the “systematic” strikes on Kyiv that Russia threatened last week are currently ongoing. The escalation follows a massive Russian aerial assault across Ukraine Tuesday that used hundreds of drones and dozens of missiles to hit cities including Kyiv, leaving 23 dead and 151 wounded, according to Ukrainian officials.

    Originally modeled on Switzerland’s World Economic Forum in Davos, the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum has long been Putin’s flagship event to attract foreign investment and highlight Russian economic progress. Following the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, all Western business and political leaders boycotted the gathering, so Moscow has pivoted to courting delegations from the Global South and other partners to advance its stated goal of building a “multipolar world” countering Western dominance. This year, the forum’s guest of honor is Saudi Arabia, which has sent a large official delegation, with other high-level attendees including the presidents of Uzbekistan and Tanzania, China’s vice president, and for the first time in years, a U.S. official: Rodney Mims Cook Jr., head of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts.

    Despite Moscow’s efforts to project economic stability, Russia’s economic outlook has darkened in recent months after an initial post-invasion boost from massive military spending faded. The Russian government has already been forced to raise domestic taxes and increase internal borrowing to keep widening budget deficits under control. While Putin is expected to downplay these ongoing economic challenges during his keynote address, the pre-forum drone strikes have thrown into sharp relief the cascading security and economic risks that the ongoing conflict continues to pose for Russia, even in its most politically and symbolically important cities.

  • Oil prices fall, Wall Street mixed after record-breaking S&P rally runs out of steam

    Oil prices fall, Wall Street mixed after record-breaking S&P rally runs out of steam

    A nine-day winning streak for the S&P 500 came to an end this week, with early Thursday trading bringing mixed results across U.S. markets and a sharp pullback in global crude oil prices, following a fragile new ceasefire deal between Israel and Lebanon and escalating geopolitical tension between the U.S. and Iran.

    Hours before U.S. markets opened Thursday, S&P 500 futures dropped 0.4%, while the Nasdaq 100 futures slid 1.2% pulled down by weak tech sector performance. In a contrast, Dow Jones Industrial Average futures climbed 0.7%, pointing to a split opening for large-cap stocks.

    Two major U.S. corporations dropped sharply in premarket trading despite beating quarterly earnings forecasts, as investors reacted to disappointing full-year outlook updates. Semiconductor and enterprise software leader Broadcom tumbled more than 15% overnight. The stock had already surged 38% year-to-date and tripled in value over the past two years, driven by booming demand for AI-related chips. Even with stronger-than-expected top- and bottom-line results, the company declined to upgrade its full-year guidance, leaving investors unimpressed. Apparel and apparel brand conglomerate PVH Corp., formerly Phillips-Van Heusen, slid an even steeper 23% after cutting its full-year outlook. The company flagged ongoing drag from global tariffs and the ongoing Iran conflict as key headwinds for its business, even as it exceeded first-quarter sales and profit estimates.

    Geopolitical developments drove sharp movement in energy markets Thursday. Crude prices pulled back $2-$3 per barrel a day after spiking on escalating retaliatory attacks between the U.S. and Iran that roiled global energy supplies. The drop followed a breakthrough ceasefire announcement: Israel and Lebanon confirmed they had agreed to extend their fragile truce and establish new pilot security zones in southern Lebanon, from which Hezbollah militants will be excluded. As of mid-morning trading, Brent crude fell $2.42 to settle at $95.39 per barrel, and U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude dropped $2.30 to $93.72 per barrel. Both benchmarks remain below the peaks hit when the Iran conflict first escalated, and Wall Street analysts hold cautious optimism that the U.S. and Iran will reach an agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil shipping, which would boost global crude supplies and ease price pressures.

    In fixed income markets, Treasury yields steadied Thursday a day after climbing to levels that pressured equity valuations. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield ticked down slightly to 4.47%, from 4.49% on Wednesday and 3.97% before the outbreak of the Iran conflict. Sustained high yields around the world have created broad headwinds for the global economy, pushing down valuations for equities and other risk assets while raising borrowing costs across sectors. The average long-term U.S. mortgage rate has already hit its highest level in nine months, and higher borrowing costs could slow companies’ plans to invest in the AI data center infrastructure that has powered much of U.S. economic growth in recent quarters. Smaller businesses are disproportionately vulnerable to higher loan costs, as many rely on continuous borrowing to fund expansion.

    Despite these headwinds, major U.S. stock indexes remain near all-time records, even amid persistent inflation pressure and geopolitical uncertainty. Global markets were mixed across regions Thursday: in midday European trading, Germany’s DAX gained 0.6% and France’s CAC 40 climbed 1%, while the UK’s FTSE 100 dipped 0.5%. Across Asian markets, all major indexes closed in negative territory, led by sharp drops in technology and growth stocks. Japan’s Nikkei 225 fell 1.4% to close at 67,470.69, with tech and energy conglomerate SoftBank Group plummeting 11.2% and chemical leader Shin-Etsu Chemical dropping 3.8%. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index lost 1.4% to end at 25,274.98, and China’s Shanghai Composite fell 0.8% to 4,057.78. South Korea’s Kospi dropped 1.8% to 8,639.41, and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 closed down 1.1% at 8,686.10.

    In a separate political development that could impact future geopolitical and market outcomes, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a war powers resolution for the first time on Wednesday that would halt U.S. military action against Iran. The vote defied President Donald Trump, with a small group of Republican lawmakers joining Democrats to back the measure, which targets a three-month conflict that has reshaped global and domestic U.S. politics and disrupted global commodity markets.