标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Panda Diplomacy: A Mayor’s Quest To Bring Pandas From China To Hawaiʻi

    Panda Diplomacy: A Mayor’s Quest To Bring Pandas From China To Hawaiʻi

    In an ambitious move that blends municipal economic ambition with high-level international diplomacy, Honolulu Mayor Rick Blangiardi has launched a years-long campaign to bring giant pandas to the Honolulu Zoo – a quest that has already taken him across China, required a direct appeal to Chinese President Xi Jinping, and sparked new conversation about the enduring role of “panda diplomacy” in tense U.S.-China relations. What began as a casual idea to boost flagging zoo attendance has evolved into a carefully negotiated diplomatic process, highlighting how China’s iconic black-and-white bears remain one of the most powerful soft power tools in global politics.

    Blangiardi’s journey began when he approached the Chinese Consulate-General in Los Angeles with his proposal to add pandas to the Honolulu Zoo. Officials there advised him to take his pitch directly to China, and last spring, the mayor and his Beijing-born wife Karen Chang embarked on a 10-day, three-city tour that cost Hawaii taxpayers roughly $29,000. The itinerary included high-level meetings with senior Chinese foreign affairs officials, visits to leading panda breeding and conservation facilities in Fuzhou and Chengdu, cultural stops including the Great Wall, and an 18-course formal meal. Blangiardi later joked to local radio host Rick Hamada that the scope of negotiations felt like working out a peace treaty – a comparison that is far closer to reality than many might assume.

    Today, only two zoos in the United States currently host giant pandas on loan from China. Securing the animals requires navigating a yearslong approval process that ultimately ends with a sign-off from China’s top leader, and comes with strict non-negotiable terms: a minimum annual leasing fee of $1 million for a pair of pandas, strict animal welfare reporting requirements, and an expectation that hosting institutions will avoid crossing China’s political red lines. All pandas remain the property of China, and any cubs born during the loan period are ultimately repatriated. For Blangiardi, however, the investment is well worth the risk: he projects that adding pandas could triple the zoo’s current annual attendance of more than 500,000 visitors, generating new revenue that can be reinvested into facility upgrades and animal care programs across the zoo.

    Panda diplomacy is not a new concept, but its role in modern geopolitics has evolved dramatically alongside China’s rise as a global power. Giant pandas are endemic to China, and historians trace the country’s adoption of the bear as a national symbol back to the early days of the People’s Republic of China. Unlike cultural symbols tied to imperial history, pandas were a “safe” unifying national icon that could be embraced even during periods of political upheaval. The modern era of panda diplomacy began shortly after U.S. President Richard Nixon’s 1972 groundbreaking visit to China, when Premier Zhou Enlai offered two pandas to the United States as a gesture of goodwill, sparking a nationwide “panda-monium” that cemented the animals’ reputation as global diplomatic ambassadors.

    Today, panda loans remain a carefully calibrated tool of Chinese soft power. The link between political alignment and panda access was underscored earlier this year, when Japan’s Ueno Zoo failed to secure a renewal of its panda loan after newly elected Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made statements asserting Japanese military support for Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion. While China did not abruptly remove the pandas mid-loan, experts confirm the non-renewal was a deliberate response to the political statement, leaving Japan without pandas for the foreseeable future. This precedent is not lost on Blangiardi, who has already adjusted a local planning decision related to a Chinatown property owned by the Taiwanese government to avoid potential offense, opting to keep the site focused on Chinatown rather than rebranding it as a Taiwan Cultural Plaza.

    For Honolulu Zoo, the bid for pandas comes as the facility has worked for years to rebuild its reputation after losing national accreditation in 2016 due to systemic underfunding. The zoo regained accreditation in 2020, and earlier this year earned approval to retain its status through 2030, a milestone city leaders celebrated as a sign of the facility’s turnaround. Zoo Director John Berry, who previously oversaw panda operations at the Smithsonian’s National Zoo in Washington, D.C., says the odds of Honolulu’s bid being approved are currently “leaning yes.” The team is currently working to prove the facility can meet China’s strict care standards, a process Berry compares to applying for a rental property: candidates answer detailed questions, then respond to additional requests for information, before the final application is sent to Beijing for presidential approval.

    Critics have raised multiple concerns about the project, from the high annual leasing fee to the cost of building a temperature-controlled panda exhibit that can accommodate the bears’ preference for cool temperatures, to questions about animal welfare in a tropical climate. Honolulu City Council member Esther Kiaʻāina initially questioned whether limited public funds would be better spent on other pressing zoo improvements, though she has since backed the project out of confidence in Berry’s leadership. Berry has moved to address funding concerns, noting that he plans to secure all additional costs from private wealthy benefactors rather than drawing on taxpayer funds, and has already partnered with the University of Hawaii to research energy-efficient cooling solutions that could position Honolulu as a leader in tropical panda facility management.

    Public reaction to the proposal has been overwhelmingly positive among recent zoo visitors. Many tourists, who come to Oahu from across the U.S. and around the world, have never seen giant pandas in person, and say the addition would draw them back to the zoo. Local residents also see the pandas as a catalyst to turn the Honolulu Zoo from a minor stop into a top-tier international destination that would boost tourism across Waikiki and the broader Hawaiian islands. If approved, pandas could arrive at the Honolulu Zoo within two years of final Chinese approval, and Blangiardi’s high-level access – aided by his wife’s Beijing roots and language skills – has already put the bid further along than many initially expected. As U.S.-China relations remain strained over trade, security, and territorial disputes, both sides stand to gain from the deal: Honolulu gets a blockbuster tourist attraction, and China gets a popular, high-profile symbol of peaceful people-to-people exchange in one of America’s most visited tourist destinations.

  • Can cut-price Shein shine in its long-awaited stock market debut?

    Can cut-price Shein shine in its long-awaited stock market debut?

    After a years-long, circuitous journey toward a public listing that saw rejected bids in two major Western markets, global fast-fashion leader Shein is finally set to ring the opening bell on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on Tuesday, marking the biggest initial public offering (IPO) in the city so far in 2026.

    The long-awaited listing caps a tumultuous road to public markets for the ultra-cheap fashion giant, which first set its sights on a Wall Street debut after explosive growth during the Covid-19 pandemic. Locked-down shoppers turned to online retail en masse during that period, and Shein turned viral social media trends like the “Shein Haul” — where shoppers posted clips of themselves trying on dozens of low-cost new garments — into a massive global customer base. The company built its popularity on an agile China-based supply chain that delivers the latest trending styles to shoppers in more than 150 countries at price points few competitors can match. As of the 12 months ending in March 2026, Shein reports it counts 281 million active customers who placed more than 1 billion orders.

    But Shein’s push for a US listing ran into stiff political headwinds. US lawmakers raised widespread objections over long-standing allegations of forced labor in the company’s vast network of Chinese supplier factories, as well as ongoing claims that the brand frequently copies independent designers’ work. Shein has repeatedly pushed back against these claims, saying it enforces a zero-tolerance policy for forced labor and takes all intellectual property infringement claims seriously. After US regulatory and political resistance derailed its transatlantic listing plans, the company explored a debut in London, only to face similar opposition.

    By 2025, with Western doors largely closed, Shein shifted its focus to Hong Kong, securing regulatory approval for the listing in July 2026. The pivot to Asia marks part of a growing trend for Chinese global firms locked out of Western capital markets, analysts note. Ashley Dudarenok, founder of Chinese market research firm ChoZan, explained that after years of trying to position itself as less Chinese by shifting its headquarters to Singapore, Shein never secured the necessary political backing abroad or policy assurances at home to move forward with a Western listing. “Shein ran out of venues that could take it,” Dudarenok said. For companies shut out of Western exchanges, “Hong Kong is fast becoming the only realistic path to market,” added GlobalData retail analyst Louise Deglise-Favre.

    Ahead of its debut, Shein priced its offering below the upper end of its marketed range, raising a total of 13.6 billion Hong Kong dollars (equal to roughly $1.7 billion) and valuing the company at $26.3 billion. That marks a steep drop from its peak valuation of nearly $100 billion just a few years ago, a decline driven by growing competition, shifting trade rules, and investor skepticism around the fast fashion sector’s long-term profitability.

    Today, Shein faces a host of mounting challenges that have squeezed its bottom line and spooked investors. New trade policies in both the US and EU have targeted the low-value small package imports that were the foundation of Shein’s growth. The US recently revoked the de minimis rule exemption that had allowed packages under $800 to enter the country duty-free, cutting off a key cost advantage for the brand. In July, the company reported a $99 million quarterly loss as sales slowed following the rule change. The EU has similarly added a new €3 tax on low-value imports, while ongoing geopolitical volatility tied to the Iran war has further raised logistics costs and caused delivery delays in key markets. Rival discount platforms like Temu are also intensifying competition, with Temu parent company PDD already reporting weaker-than-expected quarterly revenue in August 2026.

    Shein’s core business model has also come under growing global regulatory scrutiny for its environmental impact and labor practices, and the entire fast fashion sector has seen share prices slump in recent years: rivals Asos and Boohoo have seen their valuations battered by regulatory pressure and market competition. That has left investors far more skeptical of fast fashion business models than when Shein first began exploring an IPO, Deglise-Favre said. “Investors have learned to be sceptical,” she noted, adding that ongoing sustainability and ethical concerns only add more complexity to the offering.

    Despite the steep drop in valuation and mounting headwinds, some analysts still see long-term potential in the company. Deglise-Favre noted that while the valuation slump reflects a “genuine deterioration” in the company’s operating conditions, Shein still boasts a “formidable supply chain” and unrivaled global reach that other firms cannot match. As a rare standalone publicly traded e-commerce fashion firm, Shein’s IPO is being widely watched as a key test of global investor appetite for the fast fashion sector. Going forward, the company will need to prove it can adapt its model to a new regulatory landscape, including shifting portions of its supply chain and logistics outside China to avoid new import tariffs, while also rebuilding profit margins amid rising customer acquisition costs. As Dudarenok put it: as a public company, Shein must now “prove its margins still work in a world of tighter regulation, tariffs and more expensive customer acquisition.”

  • Greece signs $3.5bn air defence deal with Israel

    Greece signs $3.5bn air defence deal with Israel

    On Monday, Greece and Israel formalized a historic $3.5 billion defense agreement that will see Israel construct a multi-layered national air defense network for Greece, marking a major milestone in the rapidly deepening strategic partnership between the two Mediterranean nations.

    The Israeli Ministry of Defense emphasized in an official announcement that the pact stands as the largest bilateral defense export deal in the history of Israeli-Greek relations, and ranks among the top largest defense contracts ever secured by the State of Israel. The agreement forms a core part of Greece’s broader national defense initiative, named the Achilles Shield, which aims to build a fully integrated defensive system capable of countering drones, ballistic missiles, and fixed-wing aircraft. The full program carries an estimated total cost of $28 billion and is scheduled for completion by 2036.

    Under the terms of the deal, Greece will acquire three key Israeli defense systems: the David’s Sling and SPYDER platforms manufactured by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, and the Barak MX air defense system produced by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). The purchase also includes advanced MMR multi-mission air surveillance radars built by ELTA Systems, an IAI subsidiary. Notably, Greece becomes only the second international customer for David’s Sling, following Finland – another NATO member that shares a border with Russia. Designed to intercept large-caliber rockets and intermediate-range ballistic missiles, David’s Sling fills a critical capability gap in Israel’s own integrated air defense architecture: it complements the short-range Iron Dome system, which counters low-altitude rockets and drones, and the Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 systems, which target long-range ballistic missiles, with the Arrow 3 capable of intercepting hypersonic targets outside the Earth’s atmosphere.

    In addition to the core air defense systems, the agreement includes the delivery of a new national command-and-control network developed by Rafael. A separate $26 million secondary contract will see Rafael supply Greece with Drone Dome counter-drone systems, designed to protect critical national infrastructure and strategic sites from unmanned aerial threats.

    The defense pact comes as the growing strategic alignment between Greece and Israel reshapes the geopolitical landscape of the Eastern Mediterranean. The deepening partnership coincides with long-running frictions between both nations and Turkey: Greece has been locked in territorial and diplomatic disputes with Turkey for nearly two centuries, while tensions between Ankara and Jerusalem have surged in recent years, with open clashes across multiple regional hotspots from Syria to the Horn of Africa. Earlier this month, Israeli forces launched an airstrike on Syria’s Abu al-Duhur airbase, following intelligence that Turkey planned to deploy a permanent military contingent to the site. Tom Barrack, the U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria, warned that the strike carried a serious risk of direct military confrontation between Israel and Turkey, suggesting the attack may have been a deliberate provocation to draw Ankara into a wider regional conflict.

    While Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis has pursued a policy of de-escalation with Ankara in recent months, emphasizing potential areas of bilateral cooperation during a NATO summit hosted in Ankara earlier this year, analysts note that the new defense pact with Israel introduces significant uncertainty to this reconciliation strategy.

    Beyond regional geopolitical risks, the agreement has sparked substantial domestic controversy in Greece. Greece has historically been a vocal advocate for Palestinian statehood: in 1947, Athens joined India and a bloc of Muslim-majority nations including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Turkey in voting against the UN Partition Plan for Palestine. Greece also maintains deep historic and religious ties to occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank through the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem, whose leader is a Greek national, and whose church properties have faced repeated attacks from Israeli settlers in recent years.

    Current public outrage over the ongoing military campaign in Gaza has fueled widespread opposition to the Greek government’s closer alignment with Israel. Data from a 2026 Pew Research Center poll shows that 65 percent of Greek citizens oppose the deepening bilateral partnership, even as many respondents characterize the alliance as a necessary safeguard against what they view as expansionist Turkish ambitions in the Eastern Mediterranean.

    Parallel to the growing defense ties, the Greek government also faces growing public anger over a sustained boom in Israeli real estate investment in Greece. Israeli buyers entered the Greek property market en masse following the country’s 2010 sovereign debt crisis, when depressed prices offered attractive entry points for foreign investment. Continued high volumes of purchases have since driven up housing prices across the country, pushing many native Greek buyers out of the market and exacerbating a national affordable housing crisis.

  • Japan Inc is betting big on India as China risks deepen

    Japan Inc is betting big on India as China risks deepen

    Against a backdrop of shifting global supply chains and stagnating domestic demand, Japanese corporations across retail, finance, technology and manufacturing are rapidly scaling their presence in India, marking one of the most significant cross-border investment waves the South Asian economy has seen in recent years.

    Last week, India’s Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal led the nation’s largest-ever business delegation to Tokyo to deepen bilateral trade and investment ties, a high-profile engagement that underscores how quickly Japan’s economic footprint in Asia’s third-largest economy has grown in recent years. A walk through any major commercial district in Mumbai, New Delhi or Bengaluru makes this expansion impossible to miss: established Japanese consumer brands are racing to open new locations, while first-time entrants are carving out new market share across the country.

    Well-known names including apparel retailers Uniqlo and Muji, as well as premium footwear brand Onitsuka Tiger, have operated in India for years, but are now rolling out aggressive expansion plans to reach tier-2 and tier-3 cities. Niche Japanese firms are also joining the push: furniture manufacturer Nitori recently completed its market entry, while major convenience store chain Lawson has announced plans to launch 10,000 locations across India by 2050, starting with a first wave of stores in Mumbai.

    The trend extends far beyond consumer retail. At a time when many global financial institutions are divesting from Indian banking assets, Japanese banks are actively acquiring large stakes in the country’s growing financial sector. In 2024, Japan’s largest lender MUFG Bank closed a $4.4 billion deal to purchase a 20% stake in Indian non-bank financial firm Shriram Finance, the largest single foreign investment in India’s financial history to date. That same year, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) became the largest shareholder of Indian private sector lender Yes Bank, acquiring a 24.22% stake in the institution.

    Japan has also emerged as the top Asia-Pacific contributor to India’s fast-growing global capability centre (GCC) ecosystem, according to recent analysis from professional services firm Deloitte. More than 100 Japanese multinational corporations now operate GCCs—offshore innovation hubs that handle high-value core functions including research and development, corporate strategy and artificial intelligence development—across India, tapping the country’s large pool of skilled tech and business talent.

    Industry analysts say this coordinated expansion is driven by clear long-term business logic. Vipul Nath Jindal, founder of Next Bharat Ventures, a Suzuki-backed impact fund that recently launched a $200 million India-focused fund, explained that Japan’s shrinking domestic population has created a permanent decline in domestic demand, forcing Japanese firms to look abroad for sustainable growth. “Japan’s population has been declining for 16 to 17 years, so it’s not just a temporary slowdown—its home market is permanently shrinking,” Jindal told the BBC.

    At the same time, other traditional expansion markets for Japanese firms have become far less attractive. Geopolitical tensions and shifting economic conditions have caused a sharp drop in Japanese investment into China, while high tariffs and intense domestic competition make the U.S. market a challenging growth destination, and smaller Southeast Asian economies lack the scale to support large-scale expansion. Against this backdrop, India’s 1.4 billion-person consumer market and rapidly growing middle class make it a natural long-term growth target.

    Bilateral government ties have laid the groundwork for this private sector boom. The two nations signed a bilateral trade liberalization agreement nearly 15 years ago, and after Prime Minister Narendra Modi took office in 2014, the relationship was upgraded to a “special strategic and global partnership.” The Indian government set a target to double the number of Japanese firms operating in the country, and launched high-profile infrastructure projects including India’s first high-speed bullet train between Mumbai and Ahmedabad, which is being built using Japanese Shinkansen technology.

    Today, the expansion is being led primarily by private Japanese companies, rather than just intergovernmental initiatives. During Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s first official visit to New Delhi in July, Japanese firms announced 120 new investment agreements totalling $12.5 billion, spanning sectors from semiconductors to renewable energy. Commerce Minister Goyal has noted that Japan is on track to hit its 10 trillion yen ($68 billion) investment target for India years ahead of schedule. Even small and medium-sized Japanese enterprises (SMEs) are joining the trend: Hamamatsu City, a manufacturing hub that is home to Suzuki, Honda and Yamaha and hosts one of Japan’s highest concentrations of manufacturing SMEs, recently established the Hamamatsu India Committee to help local small businesses enter the Indian market.

    This rising investment in India has coincided with a drop in net Japanese investment into China, but experts emphasize that this is not a coordinated, government-led shift away from China. University of Tokyo researcher Toshiro Nishizaewa argues that the trend reflects a market-driven diversification strategy by Japanese firms, which are reallocating capital to reduce risk rather than responding to political pressure to decouple from China. Shruti Pandalai, India Chair at the Lowy Institute, explained that Japanese firms are simply reducing concentration risk after years of supply chain disruptions and geopolitical uncertainty, and India acts as a useful hedge against China-related disruptions. Pandalai adds that the alignment between Japan’s economic security priorities and India’s ambition to become a global manufacturing hub has strengthened the bilateral relationship, even through multiple changes of government in Tokyo. “Successive Japanese administrations have raised investment targets instead of cutting them, which shows the relationship is no longer just dependent on top-level diplomacy—it’s embedded in the bureaucratic, corporate and strategic planning of both countries,” she said.

    For India, which is actively seeking to attract sustained foreign direct investment to drive economic growth and job creation, this wave of Japanese capital comes at a critical juncture. Pandalai notes that closer economic cooperation with Japan could also help reduce India’s large trade deficit with China and gradually decrease Beijing’s economic leverage in key sectors including critical minerals and advanced manufacturing over the long term.

    Despite the momentum, experts warn that significant challenges remain to fully expanding the bilateral economic relationship. Pratnashree Basu, an analyst at the Observer Research Foundation, points out that Japan remains deeply integrated into Chinese manufacturing supply networks, which limits how far coordinated Japan-India economic action against China can go—any coordinated measures would impose major commercial costs on Japan and risk retaliation from Beijing.

    India’s own challenging business environment also remains a major barrier for foreign investors, including Japanese firms. Longstanding issues including tax policy uncertainty, bureaucratic red tape, and lengthy delays for land and environmental approvals continue to slow investment projects. A former Japanese cabinet minister recently publicly criticized the Indian government for repeated delays to the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project, accusing India of reneging on commitments to prioritize its own interests—a claim the Indian government quickly rejected. Chinese state media quickly highlighted the public disagreement to emphasize what it frames as endemic contractual risks in doing business in India.

    The incident underscores that even as India signs dozens of large-scale economic and defense agreements with Japan, New Delhi will need to implement targeted regulatory and bureaucratic reforms to maintain the current investment momentum, especially as it struggles to attract consistent large-scale foreign capital from other major global economies.

  • Orangutans in danger as wildfires blaze through Borneo

    Orangutans in danger as wildfires blaze through Borneo

    Across the rainforests of Borneo, an ecological disaster is unfolding as rampant wildfires sweep through one of the only remaining habitats of the critically endangered Bornean orangutan. Indonesia, the nation that hosts the vast majority of Borneo’s old-growth rainforest, is currently battling a wave of uncontrolled blazes that have already torn through thousands of hectares of native forest.

    For the island’s orangutan population, the damage extends far beyond immediate loss of life from the fires themselves. Hundreds of the great apes have already seen their natural territories turned to ash, destroying the food sources, shelter, and social structures that the species depends on for long-term survival.

    Conservation scientists have warned that this new wave of habitat destruction comes at a moment when Bornean orangutans were already struggling to recover from decades of deforestation driven by logging, palm oil expansion, and previous fire events. With fewer than 100,000 orangutans left in the wild globally, every hectare of lost habitat and every displaced individual pushes the species closer to permanent extinction.

    The fires, which are often intentionally set to clear land for agricultural development, have been exacerbated in recent years by longer, hotter dry seasons linked to human-caused climate change. This combination of land clearing and changing weather patterns has created a vicious cycle that increasingly threatens not just orangutans, but the entire unique Borneo rainforest ecosystem, which supports thousands of other endemic plant and animal species.

  • Jordan intelligence chief spearheaded move to arrest US journalist Ali Younes

    Jordan intelligence chief spearheaded move to arrest US journalist Ali Younes

    The arrest of prominent dual American-Jordanian investigative journalist Ali Younes, orchestrated at the direction of Jordanian General Intelligence Department director Major General Ahmad Husni, has ignited international controversy over press freedom and strained Jordan’s long-standing financial and diplomatic ties with Washington, reporting from Middle East Eye confirms.

    Younes, a veteran correspondent who has contributed to major global outlets including Drop Site News, Al Jazeera, The New York Times, CNN, Fox News and the BBC, was taken into custody by Jordanian intelligence officers on August 17 immediately upon his arrival at Queen Alia International Airport in Amman. Following hours of interrogation, authorities ordered him to appear before local prosecutors and imposed an exit bar that prevents him from leaving the country.

    Local Jordanian outlet Ammon News, which multiple sources confirm maintains close ties to Jordanian intelligence services, was the first to publicly disclose details of the state’s actions against Younes last week. The outlet framed the arrest as a response to alleged offenses including “attacks on the Jordanian Armed Forces” and the distribution of what it called “misleading information originating from a Jewish source” — referring to Middle East analyst Aaron Magid, author of the article Younes is accused of reposting.

    The core charges against the journalist center on a seemingly minor act: his reposting of Magid’s 2023 commentary published in *The American Conservative*, which questioned the justification for decades of large-scale U.S. economic and military aid to Jordan. Over the past 75 years, Jordan has received a total of $33.8 billion in U.S. assistance, with additional billions in scheduled funding locked in through ongoing bilateral agreements with Washington.

    Younes’ U.S.-based legal team, led by attorney Abed Ayoub, has forcefully refuted all charges brought against their client. Ayoub emphasized that Younes never launched any attacks against the Jordanian Armed Forces, and has a long record of complying with local laws in every country where he has worked, including Jordan.

    In a public statement, Ayoub called the charges “troubling as it is outrageous,” noting that the arrest of a journalist over a social media post shared outside Jordan’s borders raises urgent, serious questions about the state of press freedom in the kingdom. He added that the detention is inconsistent with the close, mutually respectful relationship between King Abdullah II — who is widely respected across U.S. political circles — and the United States.

    The case has already stoked significant fears for Younes’ safety, particularly given Jordan’s recent history of violent targeting of journalists. In 2016, Jordanian journalist Nahed Hattar was assassinated by a gunman outside a courthouse shortly after he was detained for reposting a political cartoon that drew conservative backlash. Younes has also faced widespread online death threats and intimidation as part of a coordinated state-aligned media campaign against him.

    Multiple U.S. figures have called for immediate action from the Trump administration and Congress to secure Younes’ release, warning that the case puts Jordan on a direct collision course with Washington. Magid, the analyst whose article is at the center of the case, described the detention as deeply disturbing, noting that Younes is a U.S. resident who merely shared an article from an American mainstream media outlet on the social platform X.

    “It is imperative that the State Department ensure his safe return to the United States and press Jordan to rescind the exit ban against him,” Magid said, adding that the crackdown directly contradicts public promises King Abdullah has made to protect press freedom. He also criticized the lack of public response from U.S. officials, noting that if Younes is ultimately convicted for simply sharing an article, Washington should reevaluate its multibillion-dollar aid commitment to the Hashemite Kingdom.

    Jason Jones, a prominent conservative Republican figure closely aligned with former President Trump and founder of the Vulnerable People Project, went further in his comments to Middle East Eye. Jones argued that the U.S. should issue an explicit ultimatum to Jordan: release Younes and drop all charges immediately, or forfeit U.S. funding.

    “Jordan is risking its international standing and billions of dollars in U.S. funding in a grave international incident: the arrest and draconian prosecution of an American citizen,” Jones said. He also pointed to ongoing corruption allegations against Major General Husni, noting that it is surprising Jordan’s government has allowed the intelligence chief to pursue a case that threatens the kingdom’s core financial and diplomatic relationship with the U.S.

    When Middle East Eye reached out to the U.S. Embassy in Amman for comment on the case, a spokesperson confirmed the embassy is aware of the detention but declined to share any further information. As of this report, the U.S. State Department has not responded to multiple requests for comment.

  • The odds of survival for those trapped after Nepal flood

    The odds of survival for those trapped after Nepal flood

    KATHMANDU, Nepal — Catastrophic flash flooding and subsequent mudslides along the Nepal-China border have left a devastating trail of destruction, with the confirmed death toll surpassing 950 and thousands more still unaccounted for. As of Monday, Nepalese rescue teams have launched an urgent race against the clock to reach hundreds of construction workers who remain trapped in flooded and mud-buried tunnels at a Himalayan hydropower project.

    Disaster response experts emphasize that the first 72 hours after a disaster event are the most critical for saving lives, as survival prospects plummet rapidly without access to basic necessities like clean drinking water. Jennifer Horney, a disaster epidemiologist at the University of Delaware, explained that the outcome for trapped workers will largely depend on whether the hydropower site had pre-established emergency protocols for natural disasters or infrastructure outages.

    “If emergency plans were in place, workers would likely have been trained to locate emergency exits, but the extreme force of this flood has packed solid mud across the site, which could block even marked escape routes and make executing pre-planned rescue strategies incredibly difficult,” Horney noted.

    A core unanswered question remains: did the tunnels stock emergency supply caches that the trapped workers can access right now. Without clean, safe drinking water, even people with limited physical activity cannot survive longer than roughly three days, Horney added.

    Alongside clean water, access to breathable oxygen is another foundational factor for survival. Six days after the flood hit, concerns about suffocation are growing by the hour, though early reports suggest some workers have secured limited oxygen supplies. Jakob Steiner, a Dhaka-based geoscientist from the University of Graz in Austria, pointed out that the tunnels themselves are large enough to accommodate large construction vehicles, which leaves open some air pocket space for trapped people.

    “From what we have learned, rescuers have managed to route small amounts of oxygen to some groups of trapped workers, and active extraction efforts are ongoing,” Steiner said. “But this is still a race against time. Beyond oxygen, the trapped workers urgently need food and potable water to hold on.”

    Disaster preparedness experts add that there are multiple other factors that will shape survival outcomes beyond access to basic supplies. Thomas Chandler, director of Columbia University’s National Center for Disaster Preparedness, noted that the presence of serious injuries among trapped workers and the ability to deliver emergency supplies through temporary access routes are also critical variables. Chandler pointed to a 2023 Himalayan tunnel collapse triggered by a landslide, where 41 Indian workers were successfully rescued after 17 days trapped underground—an outcome made possible by pumping in consistent supplies of food, water and oxygen through narrow pipes during the rescue effort.

    The internal climate of the tunnels also impacts how long workers can survive. If the tunnels are hot and humid, dehydration will set in far more quickly, even for people who are conserving energy. For those who are eventually pulled out alive, disaster experts note that comprehensive physical and mental supportive care will be essential, as the stress of prolonged isolation and harsh conditions takes a major toll on survivors.

    This report was produced in collaboration with Associated Press journalists Shristi Kafle in Kathmandu and Huizhong Wu in Bangkok. The AP Health and Science Department receives funding support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and retains full editorial independence over all content.

  • Araghchi blames ‘serpent’ Netanyahu for luring Washington into war on Iran

    Araghchi blames ‘serpent’ Netanyahu for luring Washington into war on Iran

    Escalating tensions in the Middle East have reached a new flashpoint after U.S. forces carried out an airstrike on Iran’s Larak Island over the weekend, killing and wounding both Iranian civilians and military personnel, prompting sharp vows of retaliation from top Iranian officials.

    Speaking on Monday ahead of his departure for Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reiterated that Tehran has no intention of initiating a full-scale conflict, but will not remain passive in the face of external aggression. “Iran is not looking for war, but we will never sit still in the face of any aggression,” Pezeshkian stated, according to reports from Iran’s Fars News Agency. He emphasized that any future attacks on Iranian territory will be met with a firm, decisive response from the Iranian government, adding that widespread instability across the region serves no nation’s interests and will create security challenges for all regional and global actors.

    The Sunday strike marked the first direct U.S. attack on Iranian territory since July, stoking widespread international fears of a further widening of the ongoing Israel-U.S. military campaign against Iran. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi quickly placed blame for the escalation on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accusing Netanyahu of manipulating Washington into fighting a war on Israel’s behalf. The accusation came after Netanyahu admitted over the weekend that he had dedicated decades and nearly 1,000 hours of airtime to American television to build public support for military action against Iran. “In Hebrew, Netanyahu openly crows that he suckered the U.S. Administration into a war on Iran on behalf of Israel,” Araghchi wrote on the social platform X, labeling the Israeli leader a dangerous “serpent.”

    Deputy Iranian Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi echoed the hardline stance, calling for an end to foreign interference in the Middle East and warning that Washington must be taught a “serious lesson” to deter future acts of aggression. The rising rhetoric of confrontation was further stoked by a provocative post from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who shared an AI-generated deepfake video claiming to show a devastating attack on Kharg Island, Iran’s primary crude oil export terminal. The video was captioned “Kharg Island being blown to smithereens!!! President DJT,” drawing swift dismissal from Iranian energy officials. The head of Iran’s National Oil Company dismissed Trump’s post as laughable, confirming that all normal operations at Kharg Island remain ongoing and security conditions are stable, even as workers continue to repair damage from earlier attacks. Prior to the current conflict, Kharg Island handled roughly 90 percent of Iran’s total oil exports.

    In a separate development that adds to regional maritime instability, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announced that a supertanker traveling via the southern route of the Strait of Hormuz hit two sea mines, causing a major fire and forcing the vessel to stop navigation. The IRGC Navy issued a stern warning following the incident, stating that any ship that violates Iran’s maritime security regulations through the strait can expect the same outcome, and mandatory compliance with navigation rules issued by the IRGC is required for all transiting vessels. Iran has effectively closed most of the strait—one of the world’s most critical global oil chokepoints—in recent months, though a small number of commercial vessels have continued to sail near Omani waters, occasionally with logistical support from the U.S. Tehran has repeatedly issued warnings against vessels using routes it has classified as unauthorized.

    Regional powers have stepped up calls for de-escalation to avert a full regional war. Anwar Gargash, a senior presidential adviser for the United Arab Emirates (UAE), renewed calls for “realistic and sustainable” political solutions centered on de-escalation and the full restoration of unimpeded commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Gargash argued that any new negotiation framework must go beyond the existing Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Iran and world powers, which he claimed failed to deliver a practical, widely acceptable roadmap for peace. Iran has maintained that any new talks with the U.S. must be built on the prior agreements laid out in the existing MoU, a position that puts the two sides at odds ahead of any potential negotiations. Separately, the UAE Ministry of Defense denied recent Iranian claims that missiles had targeted Al Minhad airbase on UAE territory, calling all reports of an attack completely false.

    Domestic friction within the U.S. military establishment has also emerged over the campaign against Iran. According to a new report from The Washington Post, the heads of all three U.S. military branches—Army, Navy, and Air Force—alongside regional commanders for Europe, Asia, and Latin America, have warned U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth that ongoing large-scale military operations against Iran are overstretching American military assets across the globe. The U.S. has diverted significant numbers of warships, military aircraft, and equipment from other global command regions to support the Iran campaign, weakening commanders’ ability to carry out core mission requirements and conduct routine troop training. For months, more than 50,000 U.S. military personnel have remained on high alert, as the Trump administration continues to threaten additional attacks to force Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and accept Washington’s terms for ending the current conflict.

  • Israeli army shoots first and finds reasons to justify mass killings later, veterans group says

    Israeli army shoots first and finds reasons to justify mass killings later, veterans group says

    An Israeli veterans’ organization composed of current and former military service members has leveled serious allegations against the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), claiming the military routinely carries out lethal strikes on Palestinians in Gaza before retroactively assembling evidence to frame those killed as Hamas affiliates — a practice the group calls “retrospective incrimination.”

    Breaking the Silence, a nonprofit founded in 2004 that offers a confidential space for Israeli soldiers to share their on-the-ground experiences in the occupied Palestinian territories, laid out the claims in comments from its executive director Nadav Weiman during an interview with France 24.

    Weiman outlined a clear pattern he says emerges from dozens of soldier testimonies collected by his organization: the IDF conducts strikes first, kills targets, and only then launches an effort to dig up links to Hamas or other armed groups to justify the deadly operation. Soldiers executing strikes on the ground, he emphasized, do not possess the affiliation evidence that is later used to defend the attacks to the international community.

    “First, we shoot, we kill, and then we think, and then we try to find a reason why it happened,” Weiman stated in the interview. He pointed to multiple high-casualty incidents as examples, including the IDF’s large-scale operations surrounding Gaza’s Nasser Hospital, the killing of 15 Palestinian paramedics in Rafah, and multiple air strikes that have left large numbers of civilian non-combatants dead.

    Weiman explained that after strikes are completed, Israeli intelligence pulls the identities of all people killed, then analysts comb through records to find any potential connection — no matter how tangential — to armed groups. Common justifications used after the fact, he noted, include the killed person being located near a building the IDF associates with Hamas, having a family member with alleged links to the group, or having previously been listed on a movement payroll. From there, the IDF constructs a narrative to frame the strike as a targeted operation against legitimate military targets.

    To illustrate the disconnect between on-ground action and post-strike justification, Weiman drew a comparison to operations around Nasser Hospital: “I don’t think that the tank that fired the tank shells at the hospital had a booklet with 25,000 Hamas members, and they looked photo after photo and said, ‘Ah, there are Hamas members over there’. This is something that we do after we shoot.”

    The group says this practice is not a series of isolated mistakes by individual soldiers, but rather the product of intentionally permissive rules of engagement that have opened the door to widespread human rights violations throughout the ongoing Gaza war. The core motivation for the retrospective labeling, Weiman argued, is the Israeli government and military’s desire to secure international legitimacy for their military campaign in Gaza.

    “Suddenly the IDF spokesperson in the state of Israel needs to explain to the international community what we did over there, who are the targets for the attack,” Weiman said. “And that’s why I said legitimisation before, because the IDF in the state of Israel wants international legitimisation to do what we are doing in Gaza.”

    Soldier testimonies collected by Breaking the Silence show the pattern of post-killing classification as terrorists extends even to unarmed Palestinians and children under the age of 18, the organization confirmed. The group also highlighted another consequence of the current permissive rules of engagement: the IDF has classified any person carrying a camera in Gaza as a potential threat to Israeli forces, treating camera operators as legitimate military targets.

    That policy, Breaking the Silence says, directly explains the extraordinarily high death toll among journalists reporting on the war in Gaza. Just as with other civilian deaths, the group claims the IDF has retroactively justified the killing of journalists by linking them to armed groups after the fact to defend its actions to global audiences.

    Original reporting for this story was published by Middle East Eye, a media outlet that provides independent coverage of the Middle East, North Africa and surrounding global regions.

  • Nepal rescuers blast hillside in search of hydropower workers as families wait anxiously

    Nepal rescuers blast hillside in search of hydropower workers as families wait anxiously

    In the wake of catastrophic flash floods that swept across the Nepal-Tibet border, an urgent, multinational rescue operation is underway to reach more than 600 hydropower project workers trapped in a network of mud-choked tunnels along Nepal’s Trishuli River, as anxious families hold out fading hope that their loved ones will be pulled alive from the debris.

    As of Monday, Nepalese Army teams leading the search have turned to controlled explosives to blast through rock and debris on the collapsed hillside to clear access routes to the tunnel network, after which rescue crews pump compressed air into the trapped space to sustain any possible survivors. Disaster management officials have confirmed the overall death toll from the flood disaster has climbed to 939 in Nepal, with the official count of missing people revised upward to 3,925 – 592 of whom are foreign nationals. Roughly 14% of all missing people are workers employed at the damaged hydropower projects along the river, where 279 people have already been pulled to safety, according to Nepalese Prime Minister Balendra Shah.

    The massive search and recovery effort is being jointly spearheaded by Chinese and Nepalese military teams, with specialized technical experts from India, South Korea and Australia also contributing expertise to the complex underground operation. The Trishuli River basin, located in Nepal’s mountainous northern region, is home to a suite of major hydropower projects that the country, which relies heavily on hydroelectric power for its energy supply, has spent decades developing. Officials confirmed at least 11 operational and under-construction hydropower projects suffered severe damage when the floodwaters hit.

    For families waiting at the operation’s perimeter, every passing minute feels like an eternity, and many have criticized the pace of the rescue for being unacceptably slow. “I still have a 50% hope that he is alive because there is an oxygen system inside,” Sita Pandey, whose husband was working in the plant when the floods hit, told Nepalese daily newspaper Kantipur. Anushila Bhandari, wife of 33-year-old missing engineer Aurus Bhandari, shared her desperate plea with BBC Nepali: “I wish we could find him. I wish he would come home.” Jiban Khadka, who has a relative trapped in the tunnel network, echoed the widespread frustration: “The longer it takes, the more our hope dies. This operation must move much faster because every second is meaningful to us. It’s a frustratingly slow operation.”

    Rescue teams made limited progress on Monday, when one search team managed to advance into a tunnel leading to one of the hydropower plants, only to withdraw after finding no signs of trapped workers. Air pumping operations into accessible tunnel segments began over the weekend, but family members argue that life-saving efforts should have been launched far earlier.

    Australian tunneling expert Arnold Dix, who is advising Nepalese authorities on the search remotely, explained the extraordinary challenges rescuers face in navigating the transformed landscape. “The actual signature of them has gone – everything is just missing. It looks like a lunar landscape,” Dix told BBC Radio 4’s *World at One*. The former head of the International Tunneling Association added that massive boulders, some larger than residential homes, have blocked all original access points, forcing crews to rely on controlled blasts to clear paths: “I’ve never seen that before in my life. It’s just an extraordinary operation.” Even amid the logistical hurdles, Dix remains cautiously optimistic that some survivors may be found, noting that the enclosed tunnel environment could have provided protection from the fast-moving floodwaters.

    Downstream in Nepal’s Chitwan District, the tragedy has moved to the grim phase of recovering and identifying victims. Floodwaters carried nearly 300 bodies to the district’s riverbanks, overwhelming local authorities who have been forced to arrange makeshift burials for unidentified remains, as there are not enough refrigeration units to store all the corpses. Local chief district officer Ganesh Aryaal told BBC Nepali: “We don’t have enough freezers here… We had to choose this last alternative of temporary burial system. We are really overwhelmed.” Medical teams and volunteers have begun extracting DNA samples from the remains to enable future identification, so relatives can claim their loved ones once testing is complete.

    Across the border in Tibet, Chinese state media reports a death toll of 16, with another 546 people listed as missing. Footage and first-hand accounts of the disaster have been heavily censored on Chinese digital platforms, and authorities have issued administrative penalties – ranging from fines and warnings to short-term detentions – for social media users who speculate that the actual casualty count is far higher than the official figure. Nepalese authorities have also taken steps to curb what they classify as misinformation, ordering the removal of social media content that spreads unconfirmed claims about the flood disaster.

    To date, Prime Minister Shah confirmed that a total of 11,379 people have been rescued from flood-affected areas across Nepal, and that rescue operations have been intensified to accelerate progress for the trapped hydropower workers.