Global Pulse

标签： Asia

亚洲

  • Spanish star Julio Iglesias accused of sexual assault by two ex-employees

    Spanish star Julio Iglesias accused of sexual assault by two ex-employees

    Spanish music icon Julio Iglesias, renowned for his romantic ballads and global success, has become the subject of a criminal complaint following serious allegations from two former employees. The 82-year-old singer faces accusations of sexual harassment, inappropriate touching, mistreatment, and rape allegedly occurring in 2021 at his luxury residences in the Dominican Republic and Bahamas.

    According to a joint investigative report published by elDiario.es and Univision, the allegations originate from a domestic worker and a physiotherapist who previously worked for the international music star. One accuser, identified as Rebeca from the Dominican Republic, was 22 years old during the alleged incidents and described feeling “like an object, like a slave in the 21st century” while working for Iglesias.

    The second accuser, Laura from Venezuela, was 28 when she began working as a physiotherapist for the legendary performer. Judicial sources confirmed to AFP that a formal complaint was filed against Iglesias on January 5, 2026, and is currently under judicial review, though specific details remain confidential.

    The allegations have sent shockwaves through Spain’s cultural and political circles. Equality Minister Ana Redondo has publicly called for “a full investigation” via social media platform X, while Deputy Prime Minister Yolanda Diaz described the testimonies as “chilling.”

    Author Ignacio Peyro, who recently published a biography of Iglesias, expressed “deep consternation” over the allegations, noting they were “not known” during the book’s preparation. He has called for a revised and updated version of the biography to address these serious claims.

    Multiple media outlets, including AFP, have attempted to contact Iglesias for comment regarding the allegations without success. The singer, born in Madrid, achieved worldwide fame during the 1970s and 1980s with numerous romantic hits and collaborations with renowned artists including Diana Ross, Stevie Wonder, and Willie Nelson.

  • Canada’s Mark Carney faces delicate balancing act in China visit

    Canada’s Mark Carney faces delicate balancing act in China visit

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has embarked on a diplomatically sensitive mission to Beijing, marking the first official visit by a Canadian leader to China since 2017. The high-stakes trip aims to recalibrate bilateral relations while pursuing Canada’s strategic objective of reducing economic dependence on the United States.

    The carefully choreographed itinerary includes meetings with China’s Premier Li Qiang, National People’s Congress Chairman Zhao Leji, and a pivotal one-on-one discussion with President Xi Jinping. These engagements represent a significant thaw in relations that reached a historic low in 2018 following the detention of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou in Canada and China’s subsequent arrest of two Canadian citizens on espionage charges.

    Senior Canadian officials have characterized the visit as both “consequential and historic,” aligning with Ottawa’s ambitious plan to double non-US exports within the next decade. The agenda encompasses trade discussions, agricultural cooperation, and international security matters, with particular focus on resolving Chinese tariffs on Canadian canola that have adversely affected farmers in prairie provinces.

    The diplomatic reconciliation occurs against a complex backdrop. Ottawa maintains its assessment of China as “an increasingly disruptive global power” that frequently disregards international norms, yet recognizes the necessity of engagement given China’s economic influence. The Carney administration approaches negotiations with dual objectives: fostering collaboration in mutually beneficial areas like energy and climate policy while establishing clear boundaries in contentious domains such as defense and critical minerals.

    This diplomatic balancing act has already manifested in preliminary adjustments, including the early termination of a Taiwanese visit by Canadian legislators to avoid conflicting signals during Carney’s Beijing engagement. The underlying tension reflects Canada’s challenging position of pursuing enhanced Chinese trade while maintaining its alliance with the United States, which continues to impose tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminum, and automotive sectors.

    Chinese state media has explicitly encouraged Canada to demonstrate “strategic autonomy” from American foreign policy, highlighting how agricultural tariffs imposed by Beijing last year were widely perceived as retaliation for Canadian levies on Chinese electric vehicles. With bilateral trade valued at approximately $118 billion in 2024, both nations recognize the substantial economic stakes involved, though their underlying motivations differ significantly.

    Former Canadian diplomat Colin Robertson observed that both countries are approaching the relationship with unprecedented realism, potentially laying groundwork for a more sustainable bilateral framework based on clearly understood boundaries and mutual interests. The United States is monitoring developments closely as Canada navigates its complex position between economic necessity and geopolitical alignment.

  • New US dietary guidelines trigger widespread concern

    New US dietary guidelines trigger widespread concern

    The United States has ignited international scientific debate with its newly released federal dietary guidelines that dramatically depart from decades of established nutritional advice. Unveiled on January 7, 2026, by the Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services, the guidelines position meat, full-fat dairy products, and oils at the core of recommended eating patterns while marginalizing grains and fruits.

    The controversial framework, promoted as encouraging ‘real food’ over ultra-processed products, eliminates previous alcohol consumption limits and emphasizes protein-rich diets. US officials defend the changes as reflecting emerging consensus on prioritizing minimally processed foods over refined carbohydrates. However, prominent nutrition experts have raised serious concerns about the scientific basis and potential motivations behind the revisions.

    Dr. Marion Nestle, Professor Emerita of Nutrition at New York University, expressed skepticism regarding the evidence supporting increased meat and high-fat dairy consumption. ‘They claim this is based on scientific evidence,’ Nestle stated, while questioning whether sufficient research exists to justify these specific recommendations.

    The guidelines have drawn particular scrutiny from Chinese nutrition experts who are analyzing their global implications. Gu Zhongyi, a leading Chinese dietitian, emphasized that ‘dietary guidelines don’t just affect what’s on the plate—they reshape agricultural supply chains, land use and food prices.’ China maintains its grain-centered dietary approach, which experts argue better aligns with both nutritional science and domestic production realities.

    Environmental advocates have additionally criticized the guidelines for largely ignoring climate considerations and sustainability impacts. Zhang Qinglu, a researcher at Huazhong Agricultural University, noted that the proposed dietary structure ‘fails to account for its implications on agricultural burdens,’ adding that its ‘effects on global ecological sustainability remain subject to debate.’

    The guidelines have also raised practical concerns among both American and Chinese communities regarding affordability and implementation. Restaurant owner Jimmy Zhang from Boston commented that eating more meat and dairy ‘is not realistic for a lot of families’ facing economic constraints.

    As the scientific community continues to assess the guidelines, the fundamental question remains: who do these nutritional recommendations truly serve?

  • India hunts rampaging elephant that killed 20 people

    India hunts rampaging elephant that killed 20 people

    Indian authorities have launched an extensive search operation to locate a destructive wild elephant responsible for a deadly rampage that claimed 20 lives in Jharkhand’s rural regions. The solitary male elephant, exhibiting unusually aggressive behavior, terrorized West Singhbhum district over a nine-day period starting in early January, leaving communities in profound distress.

    According to government forest officer Aditya Narayan, coordinated efforts involving drone surveillance and ground patrols are underway to track the elusive pachyderm, which hasn’t been sighted since last Friday despite intensive search operations. The victims include vulnerable children, elderly residents, and even an experienced elephant handler (mahout), highlighting the severity of the situation.

    The escalating crisis has forced inhabitants across more than 20 villages to abandon agricultural activities or implement nighttime barricades for protection. Local elected official Pratap Chachar confirmed that security teams are providing nocturnal assistance to frightened communities living under constant threat.

    This tragic incident underscores the growing human-elephant conflict in India, where shrinking habitats force these endangered giants into increasingly frequent contact with human settlements. Parliamentary data reveals that elephant attacks resulted in 629 fatalities during the 2023-2024 period alone. Wildlife experts suggest the aggressive behavior may be linked to ‘musth’—a physiological condition in male elephants characterized by heightened testosterone levels and increased aggression during mating periods.

    India hosts the world’s largest population of wild Asian elephants, recently estimated at 22,446 individuals by the Wildlife Institute of India. These elephants, classified as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, now inhabit merely 15% of their historical range due to expanding human infrastructure, mining operations, and agricultural development.

  • China eyes space leap with record satellite filings

    China eyes space leap with record satellite filings

    China has embarked on an unprecedented space infrastructure initiative by submitting plans to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) for deploying 203,000 satellites across 14 distinct constellations. This monumental filing represents the nation’s most substantial coordinated international effort to secure critical orbital resources and frequency spectrum.

    The ambitious application, dominated by China Satellite Network Group (planning 12,992 satellites) and Yuanxin Satellite Technology (targeting over 15,000 satellites), signals a strategic shift in China’s space development approach. Rather than isolated commercial ventures, this nationwide coordination elevates satellite internet to government-backed infrastructure status, involving diverse stakeholders from commercial space companies to major telecommunications operators like China Mobile and China Telecom.

    Industry experts emphasize that while the filing demonstrates long-term strategic planning, significant challenges remain in execution. Yang Feng, CEO of commercial satellite firm Spacety, notes that transforming these plans into operational constellations requires overcoming substantial hurdles in systems engineering, manufacturing capacity, and launch capabilities.

    The timing coincides with growing competition in low-Earth orbit, where currently approximately 10,824 operational satellites exist with orbital resource utilization at 18%. The United States maintains dominance through SpaceX’s Starlink program, accounting for 75.94% of active spacecraft globally, while China represents just 9.43%.

    According to Zhang Zhilong, associate professor at Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China may require five to ten years to achieve parity with Starlink in launch volume. Success will depend not only on technical execution but also on developing a comprehensive ecosystem encompassing direct-to-handset standards, terminal affordability, service models, and enhanced industry chain coordination.

    The market response has been volatile, with commercial space stocks initially surging before experiencing significant corrections, reflecting both optimism about the sector’s potential and awareness of the practical challenges ahead.

  • Defiant Iran says it’s ‘ready’ as Trump swings tariff stick

    Defiant Iran says it’s ‘ready’ as Trump swings tariff stick

    Iran has issued a stark warning to the United States, asserting its full military preparedness should Washington choose to escalate tensions through armed conflict. The declaration comes as President Donald Trump implemented immediate 25% tariffs on nations conducting business with Iran, significantly heightening economic pressure on the Middle Eastern nation.

    Global oil markets reacted swiftly to the escalating geopolitical tensions, with prices climbing Tuesday as traders responded to potential disruptions from Iran, which contributes approximately 3% of worldwide oil production. The economic measures coincide with heightened security concerns, prompting the virtual US embassy to urgently advise American citizens to immediately depart Iran via land routes to Armenia or Türkiye.

    Chinese officials condemned the US tariff strategy, with Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning emphasizing during a Beijing briefing that “tariff wars have no winners” while reaffirming China’s commitment to protecting its legitimate interests and citizens abroad. China further expressed opposition to external interference in Iran’s internal affairs and called for peaceful resolution mechanisms.

    The Trump administration’s economic offensive follows Sunday’s revelation that military options are under active consideration against Iran, including potential airstrikes. The New York Times reported Pentagon officials presenting expanded strike options targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure and ballistic missile facilities, though cyber operations remain a more probable initial response.

    Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi confirmed in an Al Jazeera interview that diplomatic channels remain open despite the tensions, noting continued communication with US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff regarding nuclear negotiations. However, Araghchi questioned Washington’s commitment to equitable dialogue given simultaneous military threats.

    The geopolitical standoff unfolds against Iran’s domestic turmoil, where December protests over economic conditions resulted in significant casualties. Iranian state media reported massive pro-government demonstrations Monday in Tehran and other cities, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei claiming these rallies successfully countered foreign-backed destabilization efforts.

  • Pakistani expat arrested for harassing minor in Saudi Arabia

    Pakistani expat arrested for harassing minor in Saudi Arabia

    Saudi Arabian authorities have apprehended a Pakistani expatriate on serious charges involving the harassment of a minor, marking another enforcement of the Kingdom’s stringent anti-harassment legislation. The arrest of Khursheed Muhammad Nazir was executed through a coordinated operation between Najran Region Police and the General Directorate of Community Security and Combating Human Trafficking.

    The Ministry of Interior confirmed that formal legal proceedings have been initiated against the suspect, who has been formally transferred to the Public Prosecution for further judicial processing. This case highlights Saudi Arabia’s rigorous application of its 2018 Anti-Harassment Law (Royal Decree No. M/96), which mandates severe punishments for such offenses.

    Under Saudi jurisprudence, standard harassment violations carry penalties of up to two years imprisonment and/or fines reaching 100,000 riyals. However, the legal framework imposes significantly heightened sanctions when the victim is a child, with potential sentences extending to five years incarceration and financial penalties up to 300,000 riyals.

    The enhanced penalty structure also applies under multiple aggravating circumstances, including cases involving repeat offenses, victims with special needs, perpetrators in positions of authority, incidents occurring in educational or workplace environments, same-sex harassment, crimes committed against unconscious victims, and offenses during times of crisis or disaster.

  • US designates Muslim Brotherhood branches in Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon as ‘terror’ groups

    US designates Muslim Brotherhood branches in Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon as ‘terror’ groups

    In a significant foreign policy decision, the United States government has formally designated three Middle Eastern branches of the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist organizations. The Tuesday announcement from both the Treasury and State Departments imposes severe sanctions on the Egyptian, Jordanian, and Lebanese chapters of the controversial Islamic movement.

    The State Department classified the Lebanese branch as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO), the most stringent designation under U.S. law that criminalizes any material support to the group. Simultaneously, the Treasury Department listed the Jordanian and Egyptian branches as Specially Designated Global Terrorists, alleging their support for Hamas operations.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio characterized the move as “the opening actions of an ongoing, sustained effort to thwart Muslim Brotherhood chapters’ violence and destabilisation wherever it occurs.” The administration pledged to “use all available tools” to disrupt the groups’ financial networks and resource access.

    This decision culminates years of advocacy from former President Donald Trump, who began pushing for the designation after meeting with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi in spring 2019. The move follows Trump’s executive order last year directing administration officials to develop appropriate sanctions against Brotherhood-affiliated organizations.

    The designations carry substantial legal consequences: providing material support to these groups becomes illegal, current and former members face entry bans to the United States, and comprehensive economic sanctions will target their revenue streams.

    The Muslim Brotherhood, founded in 1928 in opposition to British colonial rule, has consistently denied allegations of violence, maintaining its status as a political and social movement. The organization gained significant political influence following the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings, notably achieving power in Egypt through Mohamed Morsi’s democratic election in 2012 before his overthrow and subsequent death in custody.

    The U.S. decision has already created regional reverberations, reflecting the deep divisions among Middle Eastern governments regarding the Brotherhood. While Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Bahrain have banned the organization, other regional powers maintain varying relationships with Brotherhood-affiliated groups. The designation exacerbates existing tensions between regional powers including Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, for whom the Brotherhood remains a persistent point of contention.

  • Palestine Action trial: Jury retires to consider verdict in Elbit Systems case

    Palestine Action trial: Jury retires to consider verdict in Elbit Systems case

    A British jury has commenced deliberations in the contentious trial of six Palestine Action activists accused of orchestrating a raid on an Israeli-owned arms manufacturing facility. The defendants—Leona Kamio (30), Samuel Corner (23), Fatema Rajwani (21), Zoe Rogers (22), Jordan Devlin (31), and Charlotte Head (29)—face multiple charges including aggravated burglary, criminal damage, and violent disorder for their alleged roles in the 6 August 2024 incident at Elbit Systems’ plant near Bristol.

    During the proceedings at Woolwich Crown Court, Justice Johnson provided critical guidance to jurors, emphasizing that the prosecution’s case hinges on establishing ‘contingent or conditional intention’ regarding weapon use. While acknowledging the undisputed fact that defendants entered the facility armed with sledgehammers, the judge clarified that conviction requires proof of willingness to use these tools against security personnel if confronted.

    The trial revealed dramatic contradictions in testimony, particularly concerning security guard Angelo Volante’s account. Defense attorneys challenged Volante’s credibility, noting discrepancies in his statements about whether protesters’ sledgehammers made physical contact. CCTV evidence emerged as a pivotal point of contention, with defense counsel Mira Hammad characterizing missing footage from multiple security cameras as ‘suspicious’ and potentially exculpatory.

    Notably, PC Sarah Grant, the officer responsible for retrieving surveillance footage, testified that Elbit’s camera system operated with inconsistent frame rates as low as 17 seconds, describing the security infrastructure as ‘not fit for purpose.’ This technical deficiency has complicated the reconstruction of events, particularly regarding an alleged altercation in a factory alcove.

    The case has drawn significant attention due to the UK government’s July 2025 proscription of Palestine Action and the broader context of arms trade controversies. All defendants maintain their innocence, with Rogers’ attorney Audrey Mogan dismissing injury allegations as ‘a joke’ contrary to evidence of her client’s character and physical capabilities.

    The jury’s verdict, when delivered, will determine the legal consequences for the activists and potentially establish important precedents regarding protest rights, property damage, and conditional intent in British jurisprudence.

  • Iran protests: Authorities to press capital crime charges for some ‘rioters’

    Iran protests: Authorities to press capital crime charges for some ‘rioters’

    Iranian prosecutors announced Tuesday they would pursue capital crime charges against demonstrators arrested during recent protests, signaling a potential escalation in the government’s crackdown on dissent. The Tehran prosecutor’s office stated an unspecified number of individuals would face charges of “moharebeh” (waging war against God), a sharia law violation carrying the death penalty.

    The development comes amid alarming execution statistics from human rights organizations. The Norway-based Iran Human Rights group reported at least 1,500 executions in Iran during the previous year, making the country the world’s second-most prolific executioner after China. During the 2022-2023 protest wave, twelve protesters were executed, with an additional twelve put to death on espionage charges related to Israel.

    United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk expressed grave concern over judicial officials publicly discussing potential death penalties for protesters through expedited proceedings. Rights organizations fear the Islamic republic is conducting rapid trials without observing fair trial standards for detained demonstrators.

    The case of 26-year-old Erfan Soltani, arrested last week in Karaj, exemplifies these concerns. According to family sources, Soltani has already received a death sentence and could face execution as early as Wednesday, though state media hasn’t reported on the case and charges remain unclear.

    Iranian state media has emphasized that dozens of security force members died at the hands of “rioters,” while rights groups report hundreds of protester fatalities, with potentially higher numbers unconfirmed. The situation continues to draw international condemnation as Iran employs severe judicial measures against dissent.