Global Pulse

分类： world

  • Sudan accuses Ethiopia and UAE of orchestrating drone attacks on airport

    Sudan accuses Ethiopia and UAE of orchestrating drone attacks on airport

    A brazen drone strike on Sudan’s primary international gateway in Khartoum has ignited a sharp diplomatic row, with the Sudanese government formally accusing neighboring Ethiopia and the United Arab Emirates of orchestrating the attack that it labels an open act of direct aggression against Sudanese sovereignty.

    The assault, carried out on Monday, targeted not only Khartoum International Airport but also multiple military sites across the wider Khartoum metropolitan region. This attack breaks a months-long stretch of relative calm in the capital, a period of stability that followed the Sudanese Armed Forces’ successful ousting of the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) from Khartoum last year.

    Sudan’s state-run Sudan News Agency (Suna) quoted military officials as saying the country holds conclusive proof that the drones used in Monday’s assault were launched from Bahir Dar Airport located in northern Ethiopia. This accusation builds on prior claims made by Sudan’s military back in March, when it said the RSF had launched air attacks from Ethiopian soil. On that earlier occasion, Sudanese forces tracked and shot down a drone they confirmed was owned by the United Arab Emirates after it crossed into Sudanese airspace from Ethiopian territory. Military spokesmen now confirm that the drone used in Monday’s strike traces back to the same origin point.

    Ethiopia has swiftly rejected the Sudanese accusations, labeling them completely baseless. The United Arab Emirates, which has repeatedly and forcefully denied allegations of providing military support to the RSF throughout Sudan’s ongoing civil conflict, has not yet issued an official statement on the latest accusation. Following the attack, Sudan’s Foreign Minister Mohieddin Salem announced that the country has recalled its ambassador to Ethiopia for urgent consultations in response to the incident.

    Officially, no casualties were reported in the strike, Sudan’s Information Minister confirmed to Reuters. Minor damage was however sustained by an administrative building near the airport tarmac. The timing of the attack is particularly sensitive: it comes just one week after the first direct international commercial flight landed at Khartoum International Airport in three years, a milestone that was meant to mark the capital’s gradual return to normalcy after years of war. In the wake of the strike, airport authorities immediately ordered a 72-hour full suspension of all operations, with plans to resume activity once mandatory security inspections are completed.

    Back in February, Reuters reporting exposed that Ethiopia had hosted a training camp for RSF fighters and upgraded military infrastructure at the nearby Asosa Airport to support drone operations, moves that the report claimed were backed by the UAE, a close Ethiopian ally. Both Ethiopia and the UAE denied those allegations at the time, just as they have denied involvement in the latest strike. Eyewitnesses contacted by AFP on Monday confirmed hearing multiple powerful explosions and seeing plumes of smoke rise from areas adjacent to the airport, matching official accounts of the attack.

    In comments following the strike, Sudan’s Foreign Minister emphasized that even though Ethiopia has long been considered a brotherly neighbor to Sudan, the two nations have chosen the wrong path in their alleged involvement and will ultimately come to regret their actions. For its part, Ethiopia’s Foreign Ministry struck a measured but firm tone in its Tuesday response, noting that Sudan and Ethiopia share centuries of historic, enduring friendship. The ministry added that Ethiopia has so far refrained from publicizing grave violations of its own territorial integrity and national security committed by belligerent parties in Sudan’s civil war, and called for constructive dialogue between all warring factions in Sudan to end the ongoing conflict.

    The conflict between Sudan’s regular armed forces and the RSF erupted in April 2023, and has since spiraled into one of the world’s worst humanitarian catastrophes. United Nations officials estimate that more than 150,000 people have been killed since fighting began, while over 12 million have been forced to flee their homes. The conflict has triggered widespread famine across large swathes of the country, and credible reports of systematic genocide in the western Darfur region have drawn international condemnation.

  • Bowen: Strait of Hormuz standoff raises risk of sliding back into all out war

    Bowen: Strait of Hormuz standoff raises risk of sliding back into all out war

    Four weeks after a fragile ceasefire took hold across the Persian Gulf, the truce is rapidly crumbling, with escalating tensions between the United States and Iran pushing the region to the brink of renewed full-scale conflict. At the heart of the standoff is control over the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most critical energy chokepoint that has become an existential strategic and economic flashpoint for both global powers.

    When the ceasefire was first announced, it opened a narrow window for diplomatic de-escalation. Negotiators from Washington and Tehran met face-to-face in Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan, which stepped in as a neutral mediator. But the talks concluded without any breakthrough, leaving the fragile truce hanging by a thread. Pakistani officials have continued efforts to restart dialogue, but so far their outreach has failed to bridge the deep divides between the two sides.

    Both Washington and Tehran have publicly expressed willingness to reach a negotiated settlement, but their competing demands and non-negotiable red lines have blocked any path to compromise. Neither side has shown willingness to make the concessions needed to break the impasse, leaving the region just one miscalculated incident away from a return to all-out war. This standoff has created an exceptionally high risk of misperceiving each other’s intentions, a common trigger that has historically pushed unintended crises into full-blown armed conflict.

    The strategic significance of the Strait of Hormusz cannot be overstated. Before the U.S.-Israeli strike on Iran in February 2025, the waterway remained open to unrestricted, toll-free navigation for all commercial vessels. Since the attack, Iran has effectively demonstrated its ability to restrict access to the strait, using control over the chokepoint as a leverage tool: it acts as an offensive weapon, a source of potential revenue through tolls, and a deterrent against further attacks. In remarks to Iranian lawmakers this week, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi made clear Tehran’s position that the pre-war status quo will not be restored.

    For the United States, allowing Iran to exert full control over the Strait of Hormuz and charge commercial shippers millions in passage tolls would amount to an unacceptable strategic defeat. But any escalation to enforce free navigation carries enormous risks, not just for the region but for the entire global economy.

    The economic ripple effects of even partial closure of the strait are already being felt far beyond the Gulf. Already, global supplies of oil, natural gas, helium critical to advanced technology manufacturing, and fertilizer feedstocks are facing growing disruptions. The fertilizer shortage in particular has sparked urgent fears of widespread hunger in low-income nations that lack robust food security systems, putting millions of vulnerable people at risk the longer the closure persists.

    U.S. President Donald Trump’s approach to the crisis has been marked by inconsistency and conflicting priorities, rooted in a rash initial decision to go to war that has left the U.S. trapped in a strategic bind. Trump, who has long framed himself as a champion of low energy prices for American consumers, has taken to social media to pressure oil traders against raising gasoline prices for U.S. motorists. But he remains frustrated by the resilience of the Iranian regime, which has refused to buckle under pressure from U.S. and Israeli military strikes and economic sanctions. The Islamic Republic’s security apparatus, which cracked down violently on domestic anti-government protests in January, has shown it is willing to prioritize holding onto power over the well-being of its citizens, giving it little incentive to back down under pressure.

    Trump’s recent order for the U.S. Navy to escort two commercial vessels through the strait was intended as a show of force to defend freedom of navigation, but the move did little to restore pre-war traffic levels. Before the outbreak of war, 40 to 60 vessels transited the strait daily; that flow remains severely restricted, and the provocative escort mission was always guaranteed to draw a harsh response from Tehran.

    Tehran’s new leadership, which has replaced the former supreme leader and multiple senior officials killed in U.S.-Israeli strikes, has signaled it is willing to escalate to set the terms of the conflict. For the regime, the gamble of renewed war is seen as a calculated risk worth taking to secure its strategic goals.

    Regional tensions have spread beyond the U.S.-Iran standoff, with the United Arab Emirates emerging as a key Iranian target among Gulf Arab states. The UAE has deepened its security alliances with the U.S. and Israel in response, receiving an Iron Dome anti-missile defense system from Israel along with Israeli Defense Forces personnel to operate it – a step Israel refused to take for Ukraine amid its ongoing war with Russia.

    Iran’s targeting of the UAE’s key Port of Fujairah carries particular strategic weight. Located on the UAE’s Gulf of Oman coastline, outside the boundaries of the Strait of Hormuz, Fujairah is the terminus of a major oil pipeline that allows the UAE to export crude without passing through Hormuz, and it hosts one of the region’s largest commercial oil storage facilities. While the UAE has issued public warnings to Tehran and maintains capable armed forces, it has sought to avoid direct conflict with Iran. That policy could become unsustainable if the ceasefire collapses entirely, and the UAE has already committed billions of additional dollars to purchasing advanced U.S. military hardware to bolster its defenses.

    Looking ahead, Trump continues to bet that increasing pressure will force the Iranian regime to collapse and accept a deal on U.S. terms. However, he has refused to accept any agreement that would be seen as weaker than the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the landmark nuclear deal brokered by former President Barack Obama that Trump withdrew from during his first term in office, at the strong urging of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump replaced the JCPOA with a policy of “maximum pressure” that failed to halt Iran’s uranium enrichment program, and ultimately set the U.S. and Iran on the current path to a war with no clear off-ramp.

  • Thailand scraps 2001 maritime territory deal with Cambodia after years of deadlock

    Thailand scraps 2001 maritime territory deal with Cambodia after years of deadlock

    BANGKOK – In a significant shift to decades-long bilateral dispute resolution mechanisms, Thailand’s cabinet announced Tuesday it is terminating a 2001 Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with neighboring Cambodia that established a bilateral framework for negotiating overlapping maritime territorial claims. The development comes 22 years after the agreement was signed, following a years-long deadlock in talks and a sharp deterioration in cross-border relations that erupted into deadly armed clashes last year.

    The original 2001 MoU was designed to create a collaborative foundation for the two Southeast Asian nations to peacefully delimit their shared maritime boundaries and jointly manage overlapping claimed marine resources in line with international law. However, despite five rounds of negotiations held over more than two decades, the two sides failed to make any tangible progress toward a settlement.

    The termination will not enter into legal force until Thailand formally delivers an official notification letter to Phnom Penh. Its end dashes long-held hopes in both countries that resolving the competing claims would unlock development of untapped offshore oil and gas reserves located in the disputed waters – resources that could deliver major economic gains to both nations.

    Thailand’s decision to scrap the bilateral agreement follows a dramatic escalation of border tensions that spilled into open armed conflict last year. Clashes over competing land border claims broke out in both July and December 2023, leaving dozens of civilian and military casualties on both sides and forcing hundreds of thousands of residents to evacuate their homes near the border. A fragile ceasefire was reached in late December, but low-level sporadic incidents continue to be reported, and both sides have maintained large-scale military deployments along the contested border.

    The 2023 fighting reignited domestic political pressure in Thailand over border sovereignty, pushing nationalist sentiment to the forefront of national politics ahead of 2024 general elections. Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul’s ruling Bhumjaithai Party included terminating the 2001 MoU as a key campaign pledge to address public concerns over territorial integrity.

    Speaking after Tuesday’s cabinet meeting, Anutin sought to downplay concerns over the impact of the decision on the current fragile border calm. He emphasized the termination is unrelated to ongoing land border tensions and will not alter the existing ceasefire arrangements. He added that negotiations over the maritime dispute will continue under alternative frameworks, specifically citing the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) as a preferred platform moving forward.

    Thai government spokesperson Rachada Dhnadirek echoed the prime minister’s framing, stressing that the move is a strategic adjustment to the dispute resolution framework, not a break in bilateral relations or an end to negotiations. “Thailand will continue discussions with Cambodia, but we propose shifting to mechanisms under UNCLOS, which is clearer, more comprehensive and more systematic to allow maritime disputes to be resolved effectively,” she explained.

    In Phnom Penh, Cambodian officials reacted with measured regret to the Thai decision. Foreign Minister Prak Sokhonn called the move “a departure from the spirit and political will that enabled our two countries to establish a framework for peacefully resolving these issues in accordance with international law.”

    Despite the disappointment, Cambodia reaffirmed its commitment to peaceful resolution of the dispute under international law. Prak Sokhonn announced Cambodia will proceed with compulsory conciliation under UNCLOS mechanisms, a step that reaffirms Phnom Penh’s commitment to a peaceful, rules-based settlement.

    Cambodia’s newly installed Prime Minister Hun Manet emphasized his country’s commitment to peaceful coexistence in a social media statement. “Cambodia’s approach reflects our sincere hope that both countries can reach a just and lasting solution in line with international law, allowing our peoples to live together in peace, stability, and harmony,” he wrote.

    Sopheng Cheang, reporting from Phnom Penh, contributed to this report.

  • China’s top envoy meets with Iran’s in Beijing as Trump pauses US effort in the Strait

    China’s top envoy meets with Iran’s in Beijing as Trump pauses US effort in the Strait

    In a sudden Tuesday evening announcement from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, former U.S. President Donald Trump said he is halting the U.S. military mission to escort stranded commercial vessels through the blockaded Strait of Hormuz, pausing operations to give diplomatic negotiations time to finalize a deal to end the ongoing Iran war. The U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports, however, will stay firmly in place.

    The pause comes just one day after U.S. forces launched the operation to open a secure shipping corridor through the strategic waterway, which has been choked off by Iran since the conflict began. In his social media statement, Trump cited three key factors driving the decision: requests from Pakistan and other regional nations, the military gains the U.S. has made during the campaign against Iran, and what he called “Great Progress” toward a full, final agreement with Iranian negotiators. The White House has declined to offer additional context or confirm the details of the negotiation progress Trump referenced.

    The current conflict kicked off on February 28, when the United States and Israel launched joint military strikes against Iranian targets. A ceasefire has been in place for nearly a month, but the truce has remained deeply fragile as tensions over control of the strait continue to escalate.

    In a parallel diplomatic development, official Chinese state news agency Xinhua confirmed Wednesday that Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi met with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in Beijing. This trip marks Araghchi’s first visit to China since the war began, a meeting that carries significant weight given China’s deep economic and political ties to Tehran that grant Beijing unique leverage over the Iranian government. Ahead of the meeting, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly urged China to pressure Iran to lift its control of the strait, a critical global energy chokepoint.

    Before Trump’s announcement, Rubio told reporters at a White House press briefing that any lasting peace agreement would require Iran to meet two core U.S. demands: rolling back Tehran’s disputed nuclear program, and reopening the Strait of Hormuz to unimpeded global commercial traffic. “We would prefer the path of peace,” Rubio said, framing the U.S. push to open the strait as a strictly defensive mission focused on rescuing thousands of stranded civilian mariners. Rubio described the trapped sailors as “sitting ducks, they’re isolated, they’re starving, they’re vulnerable,” noting that at least 10 sailors have already died since the strait was closed.

    During the first day of the U.S. operation Monday, American military forces said they sank six small Iranian boats that threatened commercial shipping. To date, only two commercial vessels have successfully traversed the new U.S.-guarded corridor, while hundreds of ships remain bottled up in the Persian Gulf. Iranian officials have disputed the U.S. account of the clash, with Iranian state media reporting that two small civilian cargo vessels were hit in the strikes, killing five civilian crew members. Iran has also decried the U.S. corridor effort as a direct violation of the existing ceasefire.

    Top U.S. military leaders have downplayed the escalation, however. Speaking at a Pentagon press briefing Tuesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said Iran’s retaliatory attacks had not crossed the threshold into “major combat operations.” Caine called Tuesday “a quieter day” in the strait, adding that more than 100 U.S. military aircraft are now patrolling the airspace above the waterway to secure the corridor. The U.S. blockade of Iranian ports, implemented April 13, has already cut off most of Tehran’s oil export revenue, severely straining Iran’s already ailing economy. Caine also emphasized that U.S. forces would not open fire unless fired upon first. “There’s no shooting unless we’re shot at first, OK? We’re not attacking them,” Rubio echoed to reporters at the White House.

    Iran’s top parliamentary speaker and chief nuclear negotiator Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf offered a muted response to the U.S. mission, signaling that Tehran has not yet committed to a full response. In a post on X, Qalibaf said, “We know full well that the continuation of the status quo is intolerable for America; while we have not even begun yet.” He did not directly reference the backchannel negotiations between the U.S. and Iran, which are currently being mediated through Pakistan.

    The closure of the strait has already sent shockwaves through the global economy: before the war, the waterway carried the vast majority of global oil and natural gas exports, as well as fertilizers and other key petroleum products, and its closure has caused global fuel prices to surge dramatically. Breaking Iran’s control of the strait would also eliminate Tehran’s most powerful geopolitical leverage, a key goal for the Trump administration as it pushes for deep cuts to Iran’s nuclear program.

    Major global shipping companies remain deeply wary of the new U.S. corridor, even after the pause. Danish shipping giant Maersk confirmed one of its operated vehicle carriers successfully exited the strait Monday with U.S. military assistance, but leading container line Hapag-Lloyd AG said its risk assessment “remains unchanged” and that transits through the strait “are for the moment not possible for our ships.” Former military officers with experience in the region have also warned that opening the 34-kilometer wide strait is an extremely dangerous and challenging operation, even with military escorts— a security measure the U.S. is not currently providing for most commercial vessels. Currently, Iran requires all transiting vessels to use a northern corridor along the Iranian coastline, where ships must undergo vetting by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and in many cases pay fees to the Iranian government. The U.S.-backed corridor runs through Omani territorial waters to the south, outside of Iran’s control.

    Iran’s retaliatory strikes have fallen heaviest on the United Arab Emirates, a key U.S. Gulf ally. The UAE Defense Ministry confirmed it faced a second consecutive day of Iranian drone and missile attacks Tuesday, though no damage or casualties were reported. On Monday, Emirati air defense systems intercepted 15 missiles and four Iranian drones, with one wayward projectile sparking a fire at a major UAE oil facility that wounded three Indian nationals. The British military also reported two cargo ships were set ablaze off the UAE coast Monday, and a second cargo vessel was hit by an “unknown projectile” in the strait Tuesday. Iran has officially denied launching any attacks on the UAE “in recent days,” per a statement read by joint military command spokesman Ebrahim Zolfaghari on Iranian state TV.

    The Trump administration has also drawn scrutiny for its handling of congressional war oversight, citing the April 8 ceasefire to argue the president is not required to submit a formal update to Congress under the War Powers Resolution. The 1973 law requires presidents to secure formal congressional approval for military action within 60 days of launching operations.

  • Zelenskyy slams Russia’s ‘utter cynicism’ as strikes kill 5 in Ukraine before brief truce takes hold

    Zelenskyy slams Russia’s ‘utter cynicism’ as strikes kill 5 in Ukraine before brief truce takes hold

    Fresh waves of coordinated Russian missile and drone attacks targeting Ukraine’s critical energy infrastructure killed at least five civilians and left 39 others injured in overnight strikes between Monday and Tuesday, Ukrainian officials confirmed this week.

    The assault came only days after Russia announced a two-day unilateral ceasefire set to begin Friday, timed to align with Moscow’s annual May 9 celebrations marking the 1945 defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy condemned the simultaneous attacks and upcoming truce announcement as a demonstration of Moscow’s “utter cynicism,” pointing out the brazen contradiction between launching deadly strikes days before a self-declared pause in fighting.

    “Russia could cease fire at any moment, and this would stop the war and our responses,” Zelenskyy wrote in a post on social platform X. “Peace is needed, and real steps are needed to achieve it. Ukraine will act in kind.”

    Shortly after Russia made its truce declaration, Zelenskyy announced that Ukraine would implement its own reciprocal ceasefire starting at 12 a.m. Wednesday, without specifying an end date for the Kyiv-proposed pause. This latest exchange of ceasefire proposals fits a long-established pattern throughout the more than two-year full-scale invasion: Russia has repeatedly announced short, unilateral holiday ceasefires — most recently for Orthodox Easter — that have failed to deliver any lasting de-escalation, amid pervasive, deep-rooted mistrust between the two governments.

    The Russian Defense Ministry’s truce statement included a warning that Russian forces would respond with immediate force if Ukrainian troops attempted to disrupt Victory Day events during the planned pause.

    According to Ukraine’s Air Force, Russian forces launched 11 Iskander-M ballistic missiles and 164 attack drones in the overnight strikes, including an upgraded jet-powered variant of the Iranian-made Shahed drone widely used by Russian forces. Air defense crews successfully intercepted 149 drones and one incoming missile, while two additional ballistic missiles malfunctioned and failed to hit their intended targets. Nonetheless, many projectiles penetrated Ukrainian defenses to strike critical infrastructure.

    For months, Russian forces have systematically targeted Ukraine’s energy network as part of a sustained campaign to disrupt civilian life and energy supplies ahead of seasonal peak demand. Tuesday’s strikes hit natural gas production facilities in Ukraine’s central Poltava region and northeastern Kharkiv region, according to Naftogaz Group, Ukraine’s state-owned national energy company. The company confirmed that its infrastructure has been targeted 107 times by Russian strikes since the start of 2024 alone.

    Zelenskyy called the strike on the Poltava facility “especially vile,” revealing that Russian forces launched a second missile at the same site while first responders were already on the ground conducting rescue operations after the initial attack. Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko noted that while energy facilities, oil and gas infrastructure, railways, and industrial sites were the primary intended targets of the overnight assault, the strikes also damaged civilian residential buildings, commercial businesses, and public transportation networks. “Russia’s ceasefire proposals remain only statements,” Svyrydenko added, dismissing Moscow’s announcement as empty rhetoric.

    Alongside defensive efforts to repel the Russian strikes, Ukraine has maintained its own campaign of long-range drone attacks targeting Russian rear-area infrastructure, with a growing focus on Russian oil and energy facilities. In overnight attacks on Russian territory, the Russian Defense Ministry reported that its air defense systems destroyed 289 Ukrainian drones across 18 different Russian regions. Drones were also intercepted over the Azov Sea and the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia illegally annexed from Ukraine in 2014.

    Regional officials confirmed that a Ukrainian drone attack wounded three people in Cheboksary, a city located more than 900 kilometers (560 miles) east of Moscow far from the front lines of the war. Another wave of drones targeted the Kirishi oil refinery in Russia’s Leningrad region, near St. Petersburg, igniting a large fire in the facility’s industrial zone. Regional Governor Alexander Drozdenko reported that 29 incoming drones were shot down during the attack, and no casualties were recorded at the refinery site.

    The escalation of cross-border strikes comes amid heightened global attention on the trajectory of the war, as both sides adjust their military strategies ahead of potential upcoming peace negotiations and seasonal battlefield shifts. The Associated Press continues to provide ongoing coverage of the Russia-Ukraine conflict at its dedicated hub.

  • Iran warns ‘not even started’ in Hormuz

    Iran warns ‘not even started’ in Hormuz

    Tensions in the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz have reignited sharply in recent days, bringing the Middle East back to the brink of broader conflict just weeks after a ceasefire paused a two-month-old war sparked by U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran. The fresh wave of clashes has sent shockwaves through global energy markets and drawn urgent calls for de-escalation from world powers.

    After U.S. forces engaged with Iranian vessels near the strait — a chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s daily oil supplies pass — a top Iranian official issued a stark warning to Washington that Tehran has not yet unleashed its full force in the ongoing standoff. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s parliament speaker and chief nuclear negotiator, wrote in a post on X that the current status quo is already untenable for the United States, emphasizing that “we have not even started yet.” Ghalibaf added that the U.S. and its allies have undermined shipping security in the region, and that Tehran will never cede control of the strait, predicting that Washington’s “malign presence will diminish.”

    The latest clashes unfolded on Monday, when the U.S. military announced that its Apache attack and Seahawk helicopters had struck six Iranian boats that it said posed a threat to commercial shipping in the area. U.S. forces also intercepted and repelled incoming Iranian missiles and drones, the Pentagon confirmed. Separately, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) reported fresh Iranian attacks on its territory, including a strike on an energy facility in the emirate of Fujairah and a drone attack on a tanker owned by the UAE’s state oil giant ADNOC. UAE authorities said four cruise missiles were launched in the attack: three were shot down by air defenses, while the fourth fell into the Persian Gulf. The UAE condemned the strikes as “a dangerous escalation and an unacceptable transgression” of international law.

    Iran has pushed back on the U.S. account of the sea clashes, denying that any of its military vessels were damaged in the U.S. airstrikes. Tehran did, however, accuse Washington of killing five civilian passengers on boats operating near the strait. For the attacks on the UAE, an Iranian military spokesperson told state media that Tehran had no pre-planned agenda to target Emirati energy infrastructure, placing full blame on the U.S. for provoking the strikes. “What happened was the product of the U.S. military’s adventurism to create a passage for ships to illegally pass through the forbidden passages of the Strait of Hormuz, and the U.S. military must be held accountable for it,” the spokesperson said.

    The renewed tensions follow an announcement from U.S. President Donald Trump, who unveiled a plan to escort neutral countries’ ships through the Gulf in a bid to break Tehran’s de facto blockade of the strait. Trump’s initiative, dubbed “Project Freedom,” has already seen its first successful transit: Danish shipping giant Maersk confirmed on Tuesday that one of its commercial vessels had passed through the strait under U.S. military escort. Despite this small milestone, the latest clashes have upended a weeks-long ceasefire that paused the broader war that began more than two months ago when U.S.-Israeli forces launched strikes on Iran.

    That ceasefire had already failed to stop low-level clashes along other fronts, including the Israel-Lebanon border where Israel continues exchanges of fire with the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah. An Israeli military official confirmed on Monday that the Israel Defense Forces remains on high alert, closely monitoring developments around the strait after the U.S. downed Iranian missiles and drones. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun also reaffirmed this week that a security agreement and full halt to Israeli strikes are required before any planned meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a meeting Washington has pushed for to de-escalate the Lebanese front. Israeli and Lebanese officials held two landmark direct talks in Washington last month, the first such negotiations in decades, after Hezbollah opened a new front in the war on March 2, triggering heavy Israeli strikes and a limited ground invasion of southern Lebanon.

    The sharp escalation in the Strait of Hormuz has already delivered a major blow to the global economy, which has been reeling from the impact of months of conflict. Crude oil prices surged on Monday in response to the tensions, driven by fears that the strait could remain closed to large-scale commercial traffic, dragging global energy costs even higher. Global stock markets sank on Tuesday as investor confidence eroded, extending losses driven by months of volatility tied to the Middle East conflict. Soaring consumer energy prices triggered by the war have already caused widespread economic hardship across the world, and the fresh crisis has created significant political challenges for Trump just months ahead of U.S. midterm elections.

    U.S. European allies have also sounded the alarm over the crisis, warning that prolonged closure of the strait will cause deep economic damage to their own economies. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen wrote on X that “these attacks are unacceptable,” noting that “security in the Gulf region has direct consequences for Europe.” German Chancellor Friedrich Merz joined French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in calling on Iran to return to diplomatic negotiations, saying Tehran must “stop holding the region and the world hostage.” Saudi Arabia, a key U.S. ally in the Middle East, also issued a statement on Tuesday calling for intensive diplomatic efforts “to reach a political solution” to the standoff.

    Despite widespread international calls for dialogue, negotiations between Washington and Tehran remain completely deadlocked. To date, only one round of direct peace talks has been held, with no breakthroughs on core issues including the future of the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s broader regional security demands. With both sides digging in and exchanging deadly fire, the international community is bracing for a further escalation that could drag the entire Middle East back into full-scale war, with cascading consequences for the global economy and millions of people around the world.

  • Sudan’s military accuses Ethiopia of drone attacks, recalls its ambassador

    Sudan’s military accuses Ethiopia of drone attacks, recalls its ambassador

    In a sharp escalation of cross-border tensions between two neighboring East African nations, Sudan has formally recalled its ambassador to Ethiopia and publicly accused Addis Ababa of orchestrating a series of recent drone strikes targeting key Sudanese sites, including the capital Khartoum’s international airport. The announcement, made during a press conference on Tuesday, marks one of the most serious diplomatic rifts between the two countries in years, unfolding against the backdrop of Sudan’s 13-month civil conflict between the national military and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitary group.

  • What we know about Trump’s ‘Project Freedom’ in Strait of Hormuz

    What we know about Trump’s ‘Project Freedom’ in Strait of Hormuz

    The strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global energy chokepoint that carries roughly 20% of the world’s daily oil and liquefied natural gas shipments, has been largely closed to commercial traffic since the United States and Israel launched air strikes against Iran. Tehran responded to the attacks by shutting down the waterway, leaving thousands of vessels and their crews stranded in the Gulf. In response to international requests to free the trapped ships, U.S. President Donald Trump has launched what he has named “Project Freedom,” a mission that threatens to reignite open hostilities between the two nations.

    In a Sunday post on his Truth Social platform, Trump stated that leaders from nations across the globe had reached out to the U.S. for assistance, noting that the trapped ships belonged to neutral, uninvolved parties that had become innocent victims of the escalating conflict. Under the new operation, the U.S. military will guide trapped vessels safely out of the restricted waters around the strait. Trump framed the mission as a purely humanitarian gesture, arguing it would benefit not just global shipping interests and Middle Eastern nations, but Iran itself. He pointed to growing urgent concerns: many stranded vessels are running critically low on food and other essential supplies required to keep large crews healthy and maintain sanitary living conditions on board.

    Iran has pushed back sharply against the U.S. initiative, however. Iranian officials maintain that the country retains full sovereign control over the Strait of Hormuz, and have issued blunt threats to attack any foreign military force that attempts to enter or approach the waterway, specifically naming the U.S. military as an aggressive target. Senior Iranian commander Maj Gen Ali Abdollahi emphasized that all safe passage through the strait must be coordinated directly with Iran under all circumstances. A day after Trump’s announcement, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi dismissed the U.S. mission, writing on X that “events in Hormuz make clear that there’s no military solution to a political crisis,” and adding, “Project Freedom is Project Deadlock.”

    The scale of the humanitarian and economic crisis is substantial. The International Maritime Organisation, the United Nations body that regulates global commercial shipping, estimates that roughly 2,000 vessels and 20,000 sailors have been trapped in the Gulf since the outbreak of hostilities. Concern has risen rapidly over dwindling essential supplies and the growing negative impact of the blockade on the physical and mental health of stranded crew members.

    U.S. Central Command (Centcom) has deployed a large military contingent to support the operation, including guided-missile destroyers, more than 100 land and sea-based aircraft, multiple advanced unmanned platforms, and 15,000 active service members. In a public briefing, Centcom commander Adm Brad Cooper confirmed that attack helicopters assigned to the mission had already sunk six small Iranian boats that were targeting unarmed civilian vessels. Cooper warned that U.S. forces will open fire on any Iranian craft deemed to be interfering with the mission to reopen the waterway.

    Few concrete details have been released about the full scope and long-term structure of the operation, though Cooper confirmed that the ultimate goal is to reestablish a fully operational two-way shipping lane through the strait. The mission’s ambiguous framework has sparked debate over its risks: if the operation only provides navigational information and advice to crews, it would do little to mitigate Iran’s explicit threats to attack transiting vessels. If the U.S. proceeds with full military escort for all trapped ships, however, that would almost certainly lead to direct open military confrontation between the two nations. Cooper has only stated that the operation includes a broader defensive package than would be required for simple escort duty.

    Mick Mulroy, a former U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East and a veteran of both the U.S. Marine Corps and the CIA’s paramilitary division, told the BBC he believes Project Freedom will focus on providing air cover and defense against Iranian missile and drone attacks, rather than direct physical escort of commercial vessels through the strait. Even so, Mulroy cautioned that there is no guarantee the operation will succeed in restoring free commercial navigation. “The question is whether ships will trust their ability to get through without being attacked, and more importantly, the insurance company,” he explained. “If not, the effort will not have the impact we hoped.”

    On Monday afternoon, Centcom confirmed that U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyers had already transited the Strait of Hormuz as part of Project Freedom, adding that American forces were actively working to restore commercial shipping transit but provided no further operational details. The command also announced that as an initial milestone, two U.S.-flagged commercial merchant vessels had successfully passed through the strait and were continuing on their voyages safely, though it declined to release the identity of the ships. Global shipping giant Maersk later confirmed that one of its own vessels had exited the Gulf with U.S. military accompaniment. Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has directly denied any vessels have been allowed to pass through the strait.

    Grant Rumley, a Middle East security expert who advised both the Biden and Trump White Houses between 2018 and 2021, noted that securing safe passage for all 2,000 trapped vessels would be an extraordinarily difficult challenge. He argued that achieving that goal would likely require a more aggressive, large-scale kinetic military operation, a outcome he views as increasingly probable. “I think that the general consensus is that a resumption of hostilities is a question of when,” he said. “Not if.”

    Within hours of the operation’s launch on Monday, the Iranian military claimed it had opened fire on American and Israeli enemy destroyers, saying U.S. forces had ignored multiple warnings. Centcom immediately denied Iranian claims that one of its warships had been hit by two Iranian missiles. According to Centcom’s account, Iran fired cruise missiles at both U.S. warships and U.S.-flagged commercial vessels, and deployed drones and small speed boats to attack commercial shipping. In a subsequent Truth Social post, Trump confirmed that Iran had fired on uninvolved commercial vessels, prompting the U.S. strikes on Iranian small boats.

    The United Arab Emirates, a key U.S. Gulf ally that has faced repeated Iranian attacks during the ongoing conflict, confirmed that a tanker owned by its state-owned national oil company Adnoc was targeted by two drones while transiting the Strait of Hormuz. The UAE foreign ministry reported no crew injuries in the attack, and confirmed that at least three incoming missiles were successfully intercepted. Trump also added in his post that a suspected missile strike had hit a South Korean cargo vessel anchored in the Strait of Hormuz, in waters adjacent to the UAE.

  • Moment Indonesian river overflows from heavy rain

    Moment Indonesian river overflows from heavy rain

    On May 4, severe heavy rain triggered a destructive river overflow in Bogor, a regency located in Indonesia’s West Java province, leaving a popular outdoor glamping facility completely ruined by fast-moving floodwaters.

    Local reports confirm that the swelling river, pushed far beyond its banks by hours of intense downpour, unleashed a raging torrent that swept through the glamping site. The rushing water damaged infrastructure, destroyed luxury camping units, and forced any visitors or staff present to evacuate quickly. As of initial reports, no official casualties have been confirmed, but the facility has suffered extensive, irreversible damage that will take months to repair.

    Bogor, which sits in a low-lying region near Indonesia’s capital Jakarta, is no stranger to seasonal flooding. The country’s tropical monsoon climate regularly brings intense rainfall between November and May, increasing the risk of river overflows and flash floods across low-lying and rural areas. This latest flood event comes as climate scientists have warned that rising global temperatures are intensifying extreme weather events across Southeast Asia, leading to more frequent and severe bouts of heavy rainfall and flooding that threaten communities, tourism infrastructure, and local livelihoods.

    The glamping facility, which catered to nature-focused tourists looking for a luxury outdoor experience near Bogor’s popular forest and mountain attractions, was a popular weekend getaway for both domestic and international visitors. Local tourism officials have noted that the destruction of the site will have a short-term negative impact on the area’s small tourism-dependent businesses, which have only recently recovered from pandemic-related travel restrictions.

  • Armenia hosts a historic EU summit as it charts a course away from Russia

    Armenia hosts a historic EU summit as it charts a course away from Russia

    On Tuesday, the Armenian capital of Yerevan played host to an unprecedented event: the first-ever bilateral summit between the South Caucasus nation and the European Union. This milestone comes on the heels of the eighth gathering of the European Political Community (EPC), which brought dozens of senior European leaders to Yerevan just one day earlier, where discussions centered on pressing European security challenges and escalating tensions linked to the Israel-Iran conflict.

    The back-to-back high-profile meetings put a public spotlight on Armenia’s deliberate diplomatic reorientation toward the West, a shift that has accelerated after bitter tensions with its long-standing strategic partner Russia. Relations between Moscow and Yerevan collapsed into open friction in 2023, when neighboring Azerbaijan reclaimed full control over the disputed Karabakh region, ending 30 years of separatist rule by ethnic Armenian forces.

    In the wake of Azerbaijan’s military operation, Armenian leaders publicly accused Russian peacekeepers—stationed in Karabakh for decades to enforce a ceasefire—of failing to intervene to stop the advance. With Moscow already bogged down in its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russian officials rejected the accusations, arguing their peacekeeping contingent never received a mandate to engage in active combat. For regional analysts, the Karabakh conflict laid bare Russia’s waning reliability as a security guarantor for Armenia.

    “This conflict was a belated demonstration that Russia is dangerously unreliable as a partner,” explained Richard Giragosian, director of the Yerevan-based Regional Studies Center, in an interview with the Associated Press.

    Since the 2023 Karabakh offensive, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s government has moved aggressively to deepen institutional and economic ties with the EU, a strategic shift that Brussels has enthusiastically embraced. Speaking at Monday’s EPC gathering, European Council President Antonio Costa praised Pashinyan for “the courageous political decisions he has taken to bring Armenia closer to the European Union,” adding that “the direction of travel is unmistakable.” Costa stressed that strengthening Armenian democracy and countering external interference and disinformation remained a top priority for the bloc.

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also highlighted Armenia’s growing strategic importance to European trade and connectivity, noting that Yerevan plays a key role in European supply chains “specifically on the connectivity to the South Caucasus and Central Asia.”

    Over the past 18 months, Armenia has taken a series of concrete steps to align with Western institutions, moving far beyond rhetorical commitments. In 2023, Yerevan joined the International Criminal Court (ICC), a decision that drew sharp condemnation from Moscow, which labeled the move an “unfriendly step.” The ICC has an active arrest warrant outstanding for Russian President Vladimir Putin, accusing him of personal responsibility for the mass abduction of Ukrainian children during the ongoing war. In 2024, Armenia froze its participation in the Russia-led Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), a Moscow-led military bloc designed for collective defense in the post-Soviet space. Earlier this year, the Armenian parliament passed a formal resolution enshrining the country’s official ambition to acquire full EU membership.

    Unlike the post-Soviet space, where the United States has often led Western engagement, Giragosian noted that it is the EU, not Washington, that has moved to fill the geopolitical vacuum left by Russia’s declining influence in Yerevan. “EU engagement is much more prudent and much more productive than the U.S. becoming involved, simply because European engagement is less provocative to Russia over the longer term,” he explained.

    Even as it pursues closer ties with Brussels, Armenia has been careful to avoid a complete break with Moscow, for the moment retaining its membership in the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), a single market bloc that also includes Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Putin has publicly warned Yerevan that it cannot maintain membership in both blocs long-term, pointing out that Armenia currently receives heavily subsidized Russian natural gas priced far below European market rates. Pashinyan has acknowledged the eventual incompatibility of dual membership but has argued that Yerevan can continue to combine EEU membership with deepening cooperation with the EU for the foreseeable future.

    While Tuesday’s summit is not expected to immediately grant Armenia official EU candidate status, Giragosian framed the gathering as a deliberate step to deepen the already established EU-Armenia partnership, which has been governed by the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement that came fully into force in 2021. He added that the event’s greatest significance is symbolic: it sends a clear message to Moscow of Yerevan’s new geopolitical direction.

    Despite the symbolic weight of the summit, concrete deliverables are still expected, including new EU financing for domestic Armenian reforms and additional military assistance through the European Peace Facility, the bloc’s primary fund for supporting Ukraine’s defense. The EU has already operated a long-standing monitoring mission along Armenia’s border with Azerbaijan, and a new mission targeting hybrid threats was recently approved by Brussels.

    For Pashinyan, who has held office since 2018 and faces critical parliamentary elections in June, the high-profile international gathering also delivers clear domestic political benefits, boosting his profile as a reliable leader for pro-Western voters. Giragosian noted that Pashinyan’s government is widely expected to retain power, as the fragmented Armenian opposition has failed to put forward a credible alternative policy platform.

    Giragosian also pushed back against common framing of Armenia’s foreign policy as a simple “pivot” from Russia to the West, arguing that Yerevan is pursuing a far more nuanced strategy. “Armenia is also pivoting beyond the black and white zero-sum game paradigm,” he said, pointing to Yerevan’s expanding diplomatic and economic ties to major Asian powers including Japan, South Korea and China. “This is not about replacing Russia with the West. This is much more innovative, much more sophisticated.”

    The summit takes place against a backdrop of heightened tensions between Brussels and Baku, as Azerbaijan has pushed back against recent European criticism of its treatment of ethnic Armenians. Last week, Azerbaijan’s foreign ministry summoned the EU ambassador to Baku to protest a recent European Parliament resolution that demanded the release of all Armenian prisoners of war and criticized human rights conditions for remaining ethnic Armenians in Karabakh. In response, Azerbaijani lawmakers voted to suspend all formal cooperation with the European Parliament.

    Addressing the EPC via video link, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev accused European parliamentary bodies of “double standards” after the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) imposed sanctions on Azerbaijan’s official delegation to the body.

    In Yerevan, small-scale protests unfolded outside the EPC summit venue, which was surrounded by heavy security. Demonstrators carried photographs of Armenian prisoners still being held in Azerbaijan, criticizing European leaders for prioritizing diplomatic relations over pressing for the detainees’ release. Aram Sargsyan, leader of Armenia’s Democratic Party and a prominent opposition figure, told local media that European officials were using the summit to signal support for Pashinyan ahead of the June election while “forgetting about the Armenians in prison in Azerbaijan.”