A legal dispute has emerged over the alleged confession of Abu Agila Mas’ud Kheir al-Marimi, a Libyan man accused of involvement in the 1988 Lockerbie bombing and other attacks targeting Americans. Mas’ud, a 74-year-old former Libyan intelligence colonel, reportedly admitted his role in the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, which killed 270 people, during a 2012 interrogation in a Libyan detention facility. However, Mas’ud claims his confession was coerced by three masked men who threatened him and his family. His lawyers are now seeking to suppress the statement from being used as evidence in his upcoming trial in Washington, D.C., scheduled for April next year.
U.S. prosecutors argue that the confession was voluntary and reliable, emphasizing its significance in proving Mas’ud’s guilt in ‘two major terrorist attacks against Americans.’ They contend that independent evidence corroborates the details of his statement. Mas’ud’s defense team, however, asserts that the confession was obtained under duress during the chaotic aftermath of the 2011 Libyan revolution, when former members of Muammar Gaddafi’s regime faced widespread violence and persecution.
According to Mas’ud, he was abducted from his home in 2012 and taken to an unofficial prison where he was handed a handwritten confession to memorize and repeat during questioning. Fearing for his safety and that of his family, he complied. U.S. prosecutors counter that Mas’ud’s account is implausible, citing the testimony of the Libyan police officer who conducted the interrogation. The officer described the facility as well-run and denied any signs of torture or coercion.
Mas’ud is also accused of involvement in a 1986 bombing in West Berlin that killed three people, including two U.S. servicemen, and an attempted assassination of a U.S. Secretary of State in Pakistan. He allegedly chose not to detonate a booby-trapped overcoat after learning the wearer was unaware of the suicide mission. U.S. prosecutors argue this decision demonstrates his autonomy and resistance to coercion.
The legal battle over the admissibility of Mas’ud’s confession continues, with a hearing scheduled to determine whether it will be presented to the jury. The case underscores the complexities of prosecuting historical terrorism cases and the challenges of verifying confessions obtained in volatile political contexts.









