分类: world

  • Angry crowd sets Ebola hospital tents on fire in DR Congo

    Angry crowd sets Ebola hospital tents on fire in DR Congo

    A wave of violent public unrest has broken out at the epicenter of an expanding Ebola outbreak in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), exposing deep rifts between public health authorities and local communities over the response to the deadly virus. The unrest erupted after an angry crowd set fire to a section of Rwampara General Hospital in Ituri province, where nearly all current Ebola cases have been recorded. The confrontation was sparked when medical teams blocked family members from retrieving the body of a 28-year-old local footballer for a traditional burial, after medics recorded his death as a confirmed Ebola fatality.

    Witnesses and local officials report that protesters threw projectiles at hospital staff and set ablaze temporary tents that served as Ebola isolation wards. One healthcare worker was hit and injured by flying stones before law enforcement intervened to restore order, firing warning shots to disperse the crowd. Local politician Luc Malembe Malembe, who witnessed the chaos, confirmed that two isolation tents were completely destroyed, along with the young man’s body that had been held for safe burial. Initial reports that six Ebola patients being treated in the tents escaped during the unrest were later refuted by medical charity Alima, which operates the isolation site, confirming all patients are accounted for and continue to receive care at the hospital.

    Misinformation and deep public distrust have been cited as core drivers of the violence. The victim’s mother publicly stated she believes her son died of typhoid fever, not Ebola, a sentiment shared by many in the local community. Jean Claude Mukendi, security coordinator for the Ebola response in Ituri, noted that the young man was a well-liked local figure, and many upset residents failed to understand the contagious nature of the virus. Malembe added that widespread lack of public education has fueled dangerous conspiracy theories across parts of eastern DRC: many people, particularly in remote, underserved areas, believe Ebola is a fabrication invented by outside non-governmental organizations and hospitals to profit from donor funding. As of the latest official reports, the outbreak has killed more than 130 people across the country, with official death tolls varying between 139 reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) and 159 counted by Congolese health authorities, out of over 600 suspected total cases.

    The unrest unfolded as the cross-border and regional spread of the virus accelerates, prompting growing international concern. The WHO has already designated the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, though it has not yet characterized the situation as a global pandemic. Two confirmed cases have already been detected in Uganda, DRC’s northern neighbor, prompting Ugandan authorities to shut down all cross-border public transport, including passenger ferries on the shared Semliki River border crossing, to slow transmission.

    Compounding risks, the outbreak is caused by the rare Bundibugyo strain of Ebola, for which no licensed vaccine is currently available. WHO officials estimate it could take up to nine months to develop and deploy a targeted vaccine for this specific strain. Just days after the hospital violence, M23 rebel forces that control large swathes of eastern DRC confirmed the first Ebola case in South Kivu province, hundreds of kilometers south of the current epicenter in Ituri. The infected patient, who had traveled to South Kivu from the unimpacted city of Kisangani in Tshopo province, died before a formal diagnosis could be confirmed. International observers warn that the spread of the virus into territory controlled by non-state actors creates major new challenges for outbreak response, as aid groups face barriers accessing at-risk communities in these regions. M23 has stated it is willing to collaborate with international health partners to contain the virus, but the group has never previously managed a large-scale public health emergency like an Ebola outbreak.

    The crisis has already had ripple effects beyond the affected regions: DRC’s national men’s football team announced it would cancel its planned pre-World Cup training camp in Kinshasa directly due to the outbreak. Global health officials continue to stress the urgent need for expanded public outreach and education to counter misinformation that is undermining outbreak control efforts, particularly around critical safety measures such as the WHO-recommended safe and dignified burial protocol for Ebola victims, which requires trained teams to handle remains with full protective equipment to prevent new infections.

  • Israel revokes permits for dozens of Al-Aqsa Mosque staff

    Israel revokes permits for dozens of Al-Aqsa Mosque staff

    A controversial new decision by Israeli authorities to cancel entry permits for dozens of senior administrative and religious staff at Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque has escalated long-running tensions over control of one of the world’s most contested religious sites, multiple sources familiar with the policy confirmed to Middle East Eye.

    The revocation, set to take effect in June 2026, will impact approximately 30 long-tenured employees of the Jerusalem-based Islamic Waqf, the Jordanian-appointed body tasked with administering the holy site under decades-old international governance agreements. The affected staff include high-ranking Waqf officials such as senior treasurer Ayyash Abu Ayyash, as well as mosque-based teachers who are administratively affiliated with the Palestinian Ministry of Education. The move will bar these employees from accessing the site they have managed for years.

    Palestinian religious and political leaders have condemned the decision as the latest step in a systematic campaign to consolidate Israeli control over Al-Aqsa, reduce Palestinian and Islamic institutional influence at the site, and dismantle the long-standing status quo arrangement that has governed the compound for generations.

    Ekrima Sabri, imam of Al-Aqsa Mosque and head of the Higher Islamic Council, framed the permit revocation as part of a sharp escalation of “unprecedented actions” by Israeli authorities in recent months. “Every action taken by the occupation authorities is intended to change the status quo and pave the way for imposing Israeli sovereignty over the mosque, while stripping the Islamic Waqf of its authority,” Sabri told Middle East Eye. “In the past, we used to say Al-Aqsa was in danger, but now we say Al-Aqsa faces multiple dangers, not just one,” he added.

    Omar Rajoub, director of the media office for the Jerusalem Governorate, traced the recent wave of restrictions to the outbreak of US-Israeli military operations against Iran in February. During that conflict, Israeli forces implemented an unprecedented 40-day full closure of Al-Aqsa, one of the holiest sites in Islam. While the mosque reopened following a ceasefire in April, Rajoub said many of the emergency restrictions imposed during the closure have been made permanent.

    These ongoing restrictions include a ban on Waqf staff carrying out routine maintenance work across the mosque’s courtyards, from pruning overgrown trees to clearing vegetation. The permit revocations announced this month are not an isolated measure, Rajoub emphasized: already this year, at least 30 other Waqf employees, plus six additional sheikhs and imams, have been denied entry or had their permit applications rejected. Israeli authorities have also expanded restrictions on general worshippers, barring more than 600 Palestinian worshippers from accessing the compound in 2025 alone, he said. “The entire status quo at Al-Aqsa Mosque is rapidly deteriorating in favour of Israeli violations,” Rajoub added.

    The Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, located in Israeli-occupied East Jerusalem, sits on a plateau that is revered as the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism. For decades, the site has operated under an internationally recognized “status quo” agreement that designates Al-Aqsa as an exclusively Islamic holy site, with exclusive responsibility for access, worship rights, maintenance and daily management held by the Islamic Waqf.

    In recent years, however, Israeli authorities have systematically eroded this arrangement and the Waqf’s governing authority. Most notably, Israeli police have allowed near-daily incursions into the compound by ultranationalist Jewish groups, who conduct Jewish prayer and religious rituals under armed police protection, a direct violation of the status quo agreement.

    The permit revocation announcement comes amid a string of escalating provocative actions targeting the site in recent weeks. Earlier this week, Israeli cabinet ministers advanced a plan to seize privately owned Palestinian land near the Chain Gate (Bab al-Sila), one of the main entry points to the Al-Aqsa compound, to advance long-standing plans to Judaising the area around the site. Just days before that vote, dozens of Israeli ministers and members of parliament led a mass incursion into the Al-Aqsa compound, during which Israeli flags were raised, Jewish religious rituals were conducted, and one far-right lawmaker publicly called for the mosque to be demolished and replaced with a Jewish temple.

    International law does not recognize Israel’s claim of sovereignty over occupied East Jerusalem, and the Fourth Geneva Convention explicitly prohibits occupying powers from making permanent territorial changes or asserting sovereignty over territory captured in conflict.

  • Brazilian grieving father says justice still missing after Airbus, Air France guilty verdict

    Brazilian grieving father says justice still missing after Airbus, Air France guilty verdict

    Fourteen years after one of the deadliest aviation disasters in modern European history, a Paris appeals court has upheld manslaughter convictions against two of France’s most iconic industrial firms, Airbus and Air France, over the 2009 crash of Flight 447 that claimed all 228 lives on board. But the ruling has sparked fresh legal wrangling, deep grief, and divided reactions among victims’ families, as the two companies immediately announced plans to appeal the verdict, extending a case that has already stretched for more than a decade.

    The fatal flight, traveling from Rio de Janeiro to Paris on June 1, 2009, crashed into the Atlantic Ocean during a thunderstorm, disappearing from radar hours after departure. Recovery efforts took nearly two years, with search teams finally locating the aircraft wreckage and its critical black box flight recorders more than 13,000 feet (4,000 meters) below the ocean surface. Official investigations later confirmed that multiple overlapping failures led to the disaster: icing of the jet’s pitot tubes – external sensors that measure airspeed – combined with inadequate pilot response to the emergency caused the plane to lose control.

    Longstanding scrutiny of the two companies has centered on systemic failures. An Associated Press investigation revealed Airbus had been aware of design flaws in the specific model of pitot tubes installed on the A330-200 aircraft as early as 2002, but did not order a replacement across the fleet until after the 2009 crash. Prosecutors also argued Airbus failed to promptly and clearly communicate the fault risks to partner airlines and flight crews, nor did it push for mandatory training to address potential sensor failures. For its part, Air France was found culpable for failing to implement specialized training for pilots to respond to pitot tube icing events, even after the hazard was documented.

    The case has wound through French courts for years. In 2023, a lower first instance court acquitted both Airbus and Air France of manslaughter charges, a decision that triggered widespread anger and profound renewed grief among families who lost loved ones in the crash. Thursday’s appellate ruling overturned that acquittal, ordering each company to pay the maximum allowed fine of 225,000 euros (approximately $260,000). The conviction was welcomed by some victims’ representatives. Daniele Lamy, president of one victims’ association who lost her son Eric in the crash and attended both the original trial and this appellate proceeding, expressed support for the court’s decision. Victims’ lead attorney Alain Jakubowicz called the ruling a landmark win for ordinary people against global corporate giants, saying outside the courtroom, “there is no fight that it is unwinnable. Even when we are simply passengers, we can make global giants bend.” France’s National Union of Airline Pilots also endorsed the verdict, noting it was unacceptable to place full blame for the disaster solely on working pilots without accounting for the underlying institutional failures that set the stage for the crash.

    Still, the fight for accountability remains far from over. Both Airbus and Air France have confirmed they will appeal the ruling to France’s highest court, a move that could extend the legal battle for years more. Air France said it regretted the conviction and acknowledged the appeal would prolong suffering for families, but defended its position noting its criminal liability had previously been thrown out by the lower court. Airbus said it seeks a reexamination of the core legal issues in the case before the highest judicial body.

    For many families, the ongoing legal process has kept their grief raw, 15 years after the crash. Nelson Faria Marinho, a Brazilian victims’ association leader who lost his son in the disaster, says full justice remains out of reach. In his Rio de Janeiro home office, lined with newspaper clippings and photographs documenting his 15-year campaign for accountability, Marinho said the pain of losing a child is impossible to put into words. Unlike some victims’ groups, he has rejected the verdict as insufficient, saying he will not accept anything less than prison sentences for the corporate executives who led the companies at the time of the crash – a demand that goes beyond the scope of the current case, which has only examined institutional rather than individual criminal liability.

    Marinho’s wife Maria Eva echoed the enduring pain of their loss, saying the disaster left countless families with permanent wounds. Still, she noted, “as long as there is life there is hope.”

    While the legal battle continues, the crash has already left a lasting legacy on global aviation: in the years following the disaster, international regulators implemented sweeping changes to requirements for airspeed sensor design and maintenance, as well as updated mandatory pilot training for in-flight sensor emergencies, rules that have improved safety for passenger flights worldwide.

  • Ukraine’s Baltic allies unsettled by repeated drone incursions

    Ukraine’s Baltic allies unsettled by repeated drone incursions

    A mounting wave of wayward drone incursions into the airspace of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania has thrown the Baltic region into escalating security chaos, triggering multiple NATO jet deployments, the collapse of a national government, and a sharp diplomatic standoff between Russia, Ukraine and the three NATO-aligned states. On Wednesday, the highest levels of Lithuania’s government — including the country’s president and prime minister — were forced to evacuate to emergency bomb shelters inside the parliamentary complex in Vilnius after an air alert was activated over an unauthorized drone entry. The incursion forced a temporary shutdown of Vilnius International Airport, paused all urban traffic across the capital, and ordered ordinary residents to seek shelter alongside the nation’s top leaders.

    This latest incident is part of a sharp uptick in unauthorized drone sightings that has disrupted daily life across all three Baltic states over the past week, a sharp escalation of a trend that has been unfolding since 2024. All three nations are longstanding NATO members and among the most unwavering supporters of Ukraine in its war against Russia, and the current crisis stems from Ukraine’s increasingly effective long-range drone campaign targeting Russian military and energy infrastructure along the Baltic Sea coast. As Ukrainian drones traverse northern Russian territory to reach targets such as the key oil export terminal at Ust-Luga, navigation disruptions and course deviations have repeatedly sent the unmanned aircraft straying across the Baltic border.

    The growing frequency of incidents has already triggered major political upheaval: just last week, Latvia’s sitting government collapsed after facing widespread criticism over its handling of repeated Ukrainian drone incursions into Latvian territory. The day before Wednesday’s Lithuanian alert, a NATO interceptor shot down an errant drone over Estonian airspace. The following day, the incursion into Lithuania occurred, and by Thursday, both Lithuania and Latvia detected additional unauthorized drones, forcing NATO to scramble fighter jets for a second time in 48 hours.

    Diplomatic finger-pointing has intensified alongside the security disruptions. Ukrainian officials have issued formal apologies for the incursions, arguing that Russian electronic warfare and GPS jamming are deliberately redirecting drones off their intended flight paths into Baltic airspace. For its part, Moscow has levelled fierce accusations that the Baltic states are complicit in allowing Ukraine to use their territory to launch attacks against Russian targets — claims that all three Baltic governments and Kyiv have vehemently denied.

    Estonia’s foreign ministry flatly rejected Moscow’s assertions on Thursday, accusing Russia of waging a deliberate disinformation campaign of false claims, threats and provocations. “Let us be absolutely clear: Estonia has not allowed its territory or airspace to used for attacks against Russia. These claims are false and Russia knows it,” the ministry said in an official statement. Similar denials were issued by Latvia and Lithuania, with the claims drawing widespread pushback from European allies. Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot noted that the absurdity of Russia’s accusations would be laughable if they did not pose a serious threat to regional security. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen echoed that sentiment, placing full blame for the crisis on Moscow and Minsk: “Russia and Belarus bear direct responsibility for drones endangering the lives and security of people on our Eastern flank.”

    Security analysts have put forward alternative explanations for the repeated errant drone strikes, which have already damaged an unused oil tank in Latvia and a power station pipeline in Estonia. While Russian jamming is the most commonly cited cause, some analysts note the relatively accurate strikes on infrastructure-like targets suggest artificial intelligence navigation errors may also play a role, with drones mistaking Baltic infrastructure for their pre-programmed Russian targets.

    The case of Wednesday’s Lithuanian incursion has added additional layers of geopolitical uncertainty. Lithuania only shares a border with Russia via the small exclave of Kaliningrad, so any drone entering from the east must cross Belarusian airspace. The Lithuanian defence ministry confirmed Wednesday that it was actually Minsk that first notified Vilnius of the approaching drone, and that the unmanned aircraft was confirmed to have entered from Belarusian territory. That has sparked questions over why Belarus, a close Russian military ally, would warn its neighbor of the incoming drone rather than shoot it down itself. Minsk for its part has counter-accused Lithuania of allowing a Ukrainian drone to cross into Belarusian airspace.

    Facing growing security pressure, the presidents of all three Baltic nations issued a joint public statement late Thursday calling on their NATO allies to upgrade the alliance’s current air policing mission in the region to a full, comprehensive air defence mission, to counter the rising drone threat.

    The ongoing crisis has underscored the growing risk of escalation as Ukraine’s long-range strikes on Russian targets expand, bringing direct security disruption to NATO member states and raising the stakes for the alliance’s commitment to collective defence in Eastern Europe.

  • Pair arrested after boys abandoned by road in Portugal

    Pair arrested after boys abandoned by road in Portugal

    A shocking case of child abandonment has led to the arrest of two young French boys’ mother and stepfather, after the pair of children under five were discovered alone, crying, on the side of a rural highway in southern Portugal, law enforcement officials confirmed.

    The children were located on Tuesday by a passing motorist close to the small town of Alcacer do Sal, according to Portuguese police. When they were found, the boys carried only small backpacks stocked with basic food and water, but no papers that could confirm their identities or connect them to their family.

    The boys’ biological father had already filed a missing person report for his sons at their home in Colmar, eastern France, on May 11. Following the report, French authorities issued an international public appeal for assistance across the entire European Union to locate the missing children.

    After a multi-jurisdiction search coordinated between law enforcement on both sides of the border, the suspect couple was tracked down and apprehended. Local Portuguese media reports indicate the pair was located after their vehicle was spotted parked outside a local cafe in Fatima, a popular pilgrimage city located roughly 180 kilometers north of where the children were found.

    Portugal’s National Republican Guard confirmed in an official statement that officers took a 41-year-old woman and a 55-year-old man into custody. Authorities have not released the formal identities of the two arrested people, per standard investigative protocol. The pair are currently under investigation on three separate criminal charges: domestic violence, child endangerment, and child abandonment.

    The good Samaritan driver who found the boys told reporters he first gave the hungry children food and comfort before contacting emergency services to notify police of the discovery.

    Inquiries are now ongoing jointly between Portuguese and French law enforcement teams. Officials from both agencies noted that they have not yet reached any final conclusions about the case, and investigations are continuing to unfold. It remains unclear at this stage why the children were left on the roadside or what circumstances led to their disappearance from France.

  • A veteran Panama Canal engineer becomes first woman to lead the interoceanic waterway

    A veteran Panama Canal engineer becomes first woman to lead the interoceanic waterway

    PANAMA CITY – In a historic announcement Thursday, Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino confirmed the appointment of Ilya Espino de Marotta as the next chief administrator of the Panama Canal, marking the first time a woman has taken on the top leadership role of the strategic interoceanic waterway. Espino de Marotta will begin her seven-year term on October 1, stepping into the role after serving as deputy administrator of the canal since 2020.

    The appointment wraps up a multi-week selection process led by the Panama Canal Board of Directors, which evaluated a pool of high-profile, qualified candidates before settling on Espino de Marotta. At 64, the incoming administrator brings more than three decades of on-the-ground experience with the canal, having built a reputation for delivering results on large-scale infrastructure projects – most notably the canal’s landmark $5 billion expansion effort. A recognizable figure across the waterway’s operations, she is widely known for her signature pink hard hat alongside her track record of decisive project leadership.

    Following the official announcement, President Mulino shared his reaction on the social platform X, writing: “I have spoken with the new Administrator of the Panama Canal… to congratulate her and reaffirm the commitment to work in coordination on strategic projects that generate jobs, prosperity and progress for Panamanians.”

    Espino de Marotta takes the helm at a pivotal moment for the canal, which faces both major infrastructure priorities and growing geopolitical friction between the United States and China. Her immediate policy agenda centers on advancing a suite of new development projects designed to expand and diversify the canal’s operational capacity: two new ports, one at each end of the waterway, will have tender documents released in the coming months, paired with upcoming bidding processes for a new natural gas pipeline and a cross-country logistics corridor.

    Beyond infrastructure planning, the canal sits at the heart of a simmering international rivalry between Washington and Beijing. Tensions flared in early April this year, after Panama seized control of two key canal-connected ports from a subsidiary of a Hong Kong-based firm. U.S. Senator Marco Rubio subsequently accused China of “bullying” Panama by detaining dozens of Panama-flagged vessels for a short period, a claim Chinese authorities have outright denied. The U.S. has repeatedly pushed to counter China’s expanding economic and political influence across Latin America, and the Panama Canal has emerged as a central flashpoint in this rivalry – last year, former U.S. President Donald Trump went so far as to falsely accuse Beijing of controlling the strategic waterway.

    A trained engineer, Espino de Marotta holds a bachelor’s degree in Marine Engineering from Texas A&M University and a master’s degree in Economic Engineering from Panama’s Universidad Santa María La Antigua.

  • First Gaza flotilla activists arrive in Turkey after Israel deportation

    First Gaza flotilla activists arrive in Turkey after Israel deportation

    In the wake of a controversial Israeli interception of a humanitarian flotilla bound for blockaded Gaza, Israel confirmed Thursday it has finished deporting all detained foreign activists, with the first planeload of detainees touching down in Turkey to a warm welcome from supporters.

    The interception, which took place Monday in international waters, marked the latest activist effort to breach a 17-year Israeli blockade on Gaza that has tightened dramatically into a full-blown humanitarian crisis since the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war in October 2023. Hundreds of participants from dozens of nations were taken into Israeli custody after the boarding operation, sparking global outrage over how detainees were treated.

    According to Turkish foreign ministry officials, 422 activists — including 85 Turkish citizens — were transported from southern Israel’s Ramon Airport to Istanbul aboard three planes chartered by the Turkish government. An AFP correspondent on the ground at Istanbul Airport reported that the first group of arriving activists exited the airport’s VIP terminal to cheers from a crowd of hundreds of supporters waving Palestinian flags. One activist addressed the gathering, defiantly stating: “We’ve been tortured, we’ve been beaten, we’ve been arrested in international waters, but we won’t give up. We will return. Palestine will be free from the river to the sea.”

    The international backlash was triggered earlier this week when far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir posted a widely condemned video showing detained activists with their hands bound and foreheads pressed to the ground, while Ben Gvir walked among them heckling detainees and waving an Israeli flag, with the caption “Welcome to Israel.” The footage drew condemnation from world capitals across Europe, North America and Oceania, and even drew criticism from within Israel’s own government: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Gideon Saar publicly distanced themselves from Ben Gvir’s actions, as did U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee.

    Multiple European governments have called for formal action against Israel and Ben Gvir over the incident. Italy’s Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez labeled the treatment of activists “unacceptable” and called on the European Union to impose sanctions on Ben Gvir. A leaked letter from Irish Prime Minister Micheal Martin revealed he is pushing EU leaders to take sweeping measures against Israel, including a ban on goods from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and a partial or full suspension of the EU’s association agreement with Israel. The United Kingdom also summoned Israel’s top diplomat in London to protest what officials called the “inflammatory video.”

    Legal representatives for the flotilla participants have confirmed multiple reports of abuse and mistreatment in custody. Adalah, the Israeli legal center representing detainees, reported that most activists were held at Israel’s high-security Ktziot Prison in the Negev Desert near the Gaza border, before being processed for deportation. Adalah legal director Suhad Bishara told AFP that many detainees received access to legal counsel, but others were forced to attend court hearings without legal representation. Bishara also confirmed that at least two activists were hospitalized after being hit with rubber bullets, and many other detainees reported injuries including suspected broken ribs from beatings by Israeli security forces.

    Alessandro Mantovani, an Italian journalist who was detained alongside the activists and deported earlier than the main group, described his mistreatment to reporters in Italy Thursday. “We were taken to Ben Gurion airport in handcuffs and with chains on our feet and put on a flight to Athens,” he said, adding: “They beat us up. They kicked us and punched us and shouted ‘Welcome to Israel’.”

    Activists from neighboring countries were deported over land: Egyptian detainees were transferred to the Israeli-Egyptian border crossing at Taba, while Jordanian participants were sent to the Israeli-Jordanian crossing at Aqaba.

    The latest flotilla, organized under the banner Global Sumud Flotilla, involved around 50 vessels that departed from Turkey last week, marking the second major activist attempt to break the blockade in as many months. Israel has maintained a full naval and land blockade on Gaza since 2007, when Hamas took control of the territory. Following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack that sparked the current war, the blockade has cut off almost all access to essential goods, leaving Gaza’s 2.2 million residents facing catastrophic shortages of food, clean water, medicine and fuel, with aid groups warning of widespread famine and a total collapse of Gaza’s healthcare system. Israeli officials have reiterated that they will not allow any violations of their blockade, with foreign ministry spokesman Oren Marmorstein stating Thursday: “Israel will not permit any breach of the lawful naval blockade on Gaza.”

  • Morocco launches mass deportations to block Europe migration route

    Morocco launches mass deportations to block Europe migration route

    Since mid-April 2026, Morocco has launched an expansive, ongoing deportation campaign targeting sub-Saharan African migrants seeking passage to Europe, with local sources confirming security forces are arresting more than 100 people daily as operations expand across the country’s northern region.

    Initial coordinated raids targeted informal forest encampments between Fnideq and Belyounech, a common shelter area for migrants waiting to attempt crossings to Europe, where human rights groups estimate roughly 800 people have been detained. After sweeping through this northern border zone, authorities shifted focus to large-scale operations in Tangier and its surrounding areas. Multiple witnesses and migrant advocates have documented serious abuses during the crackdown, including mass arbitrary arrests, physical beatings, racist verbal harassment, and forced transfers toward Morocco’s eastern border with Algeria.

    Deportation procedures follow a tiered pattern: detainees from Sudan and Chad are transported by bus to remote border regions and abandoned without supplies, while migrants from Senegal, Mali, Mauritania, Burkina Faso, and Guinea are put on charter flights out of Casablanca for expulsion to their home countries.

    This escalation of migration enforcement is directly tied to the European Union’s deepening border externalization strategy, a core pillar of the bloc’s incoming Pact on Migration and Asylum set to enter into force in June 2026. For years, the EU has increasingly outsourced its immigration control to North African nations with well-documented poor human rights records, allocating more than €900 million through its Global Europe development instrument to fund expanded border management, surveillance, and migration restriction initiatives across the region.

    “Essentially, this is about the EU exercising border control without getting its own hands dirty,” explained Frey Lindsay, a journalist with Statewatch’s Outsourcing Borders project, which monitors the bloc’s offshored migration enforcement. “The goal is to stop migration as far downstream along the route as possible, before anyone reaches EU territory.”

    As a key transit country for sub-Saharan African migrants heading to Europe, Morocco has steadily deepened its cooperation with Frontex, the EU’s Border and Coast Guard Agency, to block irregular departures from its northern coast. Moroccan interior ministry data shows authorities thwarted 73,640 irregular migration attempts in 2025, a small decline from 2024 that officials attribute to shifts to alternative migration routes.

    Worsening conditions for migrants in northern Morocco have been well documented by grassroots and human rights groups. Chad Boukhari, a journalist and member of Border Resistance, a Mediterranean grassroots collective supporting migrants, told Middle East Eye that migrants reported widespread mistreatment and humiliation at the hands of Moroccan security forces. “Many were abandoned near the Algerian border with no food or water, and many of those people were then detained by Algerian forces,” Boukhari said. “Witnesses told us the Algerian army tortured many detainees, and some migrants even found the bodies of other migrants left in the desert.” This pattern of cross-border abandonment and abuse is not new: in 2025 alone, Algeria expelled more than 30,000 migrants to Niger, leaving multiple deportation convoys stranded in the Sahara, with widespread accounts of torture, enslavement, and systematic abuse emerging from the region.

    Middle East Eye reached out for comment to Moroccan, Algerian, and EU authorities, but had not received a response as of publication.

    For most sub-Saharan African migrants, the journey to Morocco already involves crossing the Sahel, an arid, dangerous trans-Saharan belt, through Niger and Algeria or Mauritania. Many originate from Sahel nations gripped by chronic instability and ranked among the lowest on the United Nations’ Human Development Index, making the dangerous journey to Europe a compelling option despite the risks. After arriving in Morocco, many spend months or even years living in informal camps in the country’s dense northern forests, where humanitarian groups occasionally provide limited aid—though these efforts are often disrupted by authorities.

    Long before the current 2026 crackdown, Human Rights Watch has documented repeated, systemic abuses against migrants in Morocco dating back to 2014, including beatings by police, confiscation and destruction of personal property, burning of informal shelters, and extrajudicial expulsions without due process. Ousman Sow, a Guinean migrant who spent a year in Morocco before successfully crossing to Spain and now resides in Germany, described a pattern of coordinated monitoring of humanitarian aid efforts. “Oftentimes, the Red Cross would come to the forest and give us blankets and clothing, but we always knew that was a bad sign,” Sow said. “Shortly after those visits, Moroccan security forces would show up, like they had been tipped off or were watching. They burned all our things, then drove us to remote areas and left us there with nothing.”

    Security operations are primarily focused on blocking access to Ceuta and Melilla, two Spanish enclaves on Moroccan territory that represent the only land border between Europe and Africa. The 2022 Melilla fence tragedy, where at least 23 mostly sub-Saharan African migrants were killed under disputed circumstances while attempting to cross the border, with another 70 people still missing, has served as a grim reminder of the deadly risks of this route. Reports have since emerged that Moroccan authorities buried many of the victims in unmarked, unrecorded graves.

    Even with sharply increased enforcement, migration flows from North Africa to Europe have remained steady, driven by the ongoing war in Sudan and accelerating political and security collapse across the Sahel. For millions of displaced people, the promise of safety and opportunity in Europe still outweighs the extreme risks of the journey.

    Lindsay warns that increased securitization of borders does nothing to address the root causes of migration, and only makes the journey deadlier. “The more borders and walls you build, the more dangerous alternative routes migrants are forced to take,” she noted. “Securitization doesn’t change why people leave their homes—it just makes more people die along the way.”

    Rights advocates emphasize that the current crackdown in Morocco is a direct response to the EU’s new migration pact, which overhauls the bloc’s existing asylum system to speed up asylum case processing and deportations. The new framework expands biometric border surveillance and makes it easier to reject asylum claims on the grounds that a migrant passed through a “safe third country” before reaching the EU. Morocco is among the nations listed as safe third countries, alongside Egypt and Turkey—both of which face widespread allegations of systemic human rights abuses against migrants. Over 50 international non-governmental organizations have formally opposed the pact, arguing that its expedited procedures violate the fundamental right to a fair asylum review.

    By externalizing enforcement, the EU effectively blocks most migrants from ever reaching a point where they can file an asylum claim, shifting all operational and ethical responsibility for border control to non-EU nations. Under the EU’s Emergency Trust Fund for Africa, the bloc has already allocated hundreds of millions of euros to strengthen migration enforcement in Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya.

    The new migration pact is a high-stakes political priority for European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and her administration, which needs a legislative win to maintain political support among EU member states. “Member states have made it very clear they will not back the pact unless the European Commission does everything possible to cut arrivals and deport as many people as possible,” Lindsay explained.

    Patterns of abuse linked to EU-funded externalized border enforcement have already been well-documented in Libya, where the EU directly funds, trains, and equips Libyan coastal authorities that have been repeatedly accused of colluding with human trafficking networks to detain migrants, who are then subjected to systematic exploitation, physical and sexual violence, and enslavement. The EU is currently moving forward with plans to fund a new maritime control center in Benghazi, which is controlled by warlord Khalifa Haftar—accused of multiple war crimes by the United Nations—to intercept migrants at sea and force them back to Libya. Similar violent pushback practices have been documented along the EU’s eastern Balkans route, where Croatian border forces have repeatedly been recorded forcing migrants back into Bosnia, blocking them from accessing asylum procedures on EU territory.

    The new pact also establishes a network of “return hubs,” third countries where rejected asylum seekers can be transferred and detained while waiting for deportation—often to nations where they have no family, community, or prior connections, with proposed hubs ranging from Bangladesh to Rwanda.

    Human rights groups warn the pact reflects a broad, dangerous hardening of anti-migrant policy across EU member states that will have deadly consequences for thousands of people every year. For migrants in transit, shifting political winds in Europe directly shape their treatment in North African transit nations. As Ousman Sow put it: “Whenever the political climate changes in Europe, you can feel it in Morocco. If Europe wants immigrants, Morocco is okay. If not, it’s hostile there.”

  • Macron once campaigned for Ramy Shaath’s freedom. Now he wants to deport him

    Macron once campaigned for Ramy Shaath’s freedom. Now he wants to deport him

    In January 2022, after 900 days of detention in an Egyptian correctional facility, Ramy Shaath stepped onto French soil at Paris’ Roissy Airport. To secure his release, the Palestinian academic and long-time political organizer was forced to renounce his Egyptian citizenship, and was greeted on arrival by his French wife Celine Lebrun-Shaath and crowds of cheering supporters. The release came after intensive diplomatic pressure from then-French President Emmanuel Macron, who personally lobbied Egyptian leader Abdel Fattah el-Sisi to secure Shaath’s freedom. “I share the relief of his wife,” Macron wrote at the time. “Thank you to everyone who has played a positive role in this happy outcome.”

    Four years later, that warm welcome has curdled into a formal deportation order, framing Shaath as a “serious threat to public order” in France. On Thursday, he is scheduled to appear before an advisory deportation committee in Nanterre, the western Paris suburb where he has resided since 2022, to review the government’s attempt to remove him from the country. While the committee’s ruling is non-binding and French authorities retain the power to act regardless of its outcome, the proceedings mark the latest escalation in a months-long campaign of administrative harassment targeting the prominent activist.

    Born in the besieged Gaza Strip, Shaath argues that French and European law prohibit his deportation to any available destination. “They cannot send me back to Gaza; one, because it’s a war zone and because I am targeted by the Israelis,” he told Middle East Eye in an exclusive interview. “And in both cases, European law will not allow them to send me to Palestine. And of course, I know more Egyptians, but they cannot send me to Egypt.” While he acknowledges a remote possibility that authorities could resettle him in an unrelated third country – “so I could find myself in Liberia or Gambia” – he expects to instead be left in a permanent state of legal limbo, locked out from renewing his temporary residency, cut off from basic public services, and subjected to ongoing law enforcement surveillance.

    The foundation for the deportation push is Shaath’s decades-long open advocacy for Palestinian rights and statehood. Before his detention in Egypt, he rose to prominence as a key organizer during the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings that ousted longtime authoritarian leader Hosni Mubarak, and served as the national coordinator for the Egyptian chapter of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement targeting Israel over its occupation of Palestinian territory.

    After arriving in France in 2022, Shaath was granted an initial one-year residence visa. When he applied for renewal in September 2023, shortly after Israel launched its large-scale military campaign in Gaza following the October 7 attacks, he received no official response. He has since filed 10 urgent legal appeals for residency renewal, all of which have gone unanswered. On April 30, he received formal notice at his Nanterre home that deportation proceedings had officially been opened against him.

    Documents released by the Nanterre prefecture lay out the government’s justifications for the order, centered almost entirely on Shaath’s public comments and pro-Palestine organizing. The filing cites his long-standing connections to prominent Palestinian rights organizers in France, his public descriptions of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza as a “criminal occupation,” his open self-identification as an anti-Zionist, and his public support for a one-state solution that guarantees equal rights for all people living in historic Palestine.

    Reacting to the prefecture’s claims, Shaath expressed sarcastic disbelief. “Oh my god, are you fucking serious? The French services cracked the biggest secret of my life! For 40 years I have not had one speech that I didn’t attack Zionism, and today you cracked my heart that I’ve been lying about – that I am anti-Zionist? Unbelievable.”

    Other accusations in the filing, he says, are outright falsifications. Authorities cite one incident where he gave a “militaristic speech” while wearing military fatigues; Shaath notes that publicly available video of the event shows him sitting to deliver an academic lecture, wearing plain beige Uniqlo trousers. The filing also highlights a public comment where Shaath called on Iran to intervene to stop Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, which has killed more than 72,000 Palestinians, the vast majority of them women and children, and reduced most of the Gaza Strip to rubble. Shaath counters that he has also repeatedly called on France to deploy its military to intercept Israeli aircraft carrying out strikes on civilian targets in Gaza, a fact French officials have deliberately omitted from their filing.

    “This is a McCarthyist attack that is racist, that is criminal, that is beyond the law to harass everybody who talks about Palestine,” he said.

    Middle East Eye reached out to both the French Interior Ministry and the Nanterre prefecture for comment on the proceedings, but received no response ahead of publication.

    Shaath’s case is far from isolated. Since the start of Israel’s Gaza war in October 2023, France has joined most other Western European nations in rolling out a widespread crackdown on pro-Palestine advocacy and protest. The crackdown has been particularly acute on university campuses, where student organizers, faculty, and labor unions have repeatedly warned of growing punitive pressure on anyone expressing public support for Palestinian rights. Peaceful demonstrations, public lectures, and campus occupations have been reclassified as illegal public disorder, leading to disciplinary proceedings, administrative fines, criminal charges, and in dozens of cases, permanent criminal records for participants.

    Last month, the French parliament was scheduled to debate a controversial new bill that would introduce a range of new criminal penalties for public criticism of Israel, including criminalization of denials of Israel’s right to exist and criminal sanctions for public comparisons of Israeli policy to Nazi Germany. While the bill was ultimately pulled from the parliamentary calendar amid procedural disputes, the Macron administration has confirmed it intends to reintroduce identical legislation this summer. The proposed text would also expand the definition of terrorism-related offenses to include “implicit provocation,” a vague standard that legal experts warn would enable widespread crackdowns on anti-war and pro-Palestine speech.

    Unlike many grassroots Palestinian rights organizers, Shaath comes from a prominent Palestinian political background: he is the son of Nabil Shaath, a former Palestinian Authority prime minister and chief Palestinian negotiator, previously served as an advisor to iconic PLO leader Yasser Arafat, was a member of the Palestinian Authority’s official negotiation team with Israel, and has even been invited to deliver formal addresses to the French Senate and Foreign Ministry. Nanterre, his home city, named him an honorary citizen in 2021, before his release from Egyptian prison. None of these credentials have shielded him from the sweeping new crackdown on pro-Palestine speech.

    In response to the deportation order, Shaath’s family, friends, and supporters announced a new public campaign last Sunday to block his removal, under the hashtag #FreeRamyShaath2. The name references the first international campaign that secured Shaath’s release from Egyptian prison between 2019 and 2022, when he was charged with “aiding a terrorist group in achieving its goals.” Crucially, the first campaign enjoyed formal support from the French political establishment; the second is a direct challenge to that same establishment’s current crackdown on Palestinian advocacy.

    This is not the first time French authorities have targeted Shaath over his pro-Palestine speech. In November 2023, Laurent Nunez, then the prefect of Paris and now the French Interior Minister, referred Shaath to the French justice system on charges of “apology for terrorism,” based on a rally speech where he stated that “the Palestinian people, like all people under occupation, have the right to defend themselves and resist.” The case was ultimately dismissed by Paris prosecutors 11 months after it was opened.

    Shaath, who explicitly says he opposes all forms of violence and racism, including antisemitism, argues that even when the baseless charges are thrown out, the administrative process itself is a form of punishment designed to force him to end his activism or leave the country voluntarily. “Yes, of course, if they continue this draconian decision against me and put me under house arrest… I will fight it, but I’m not going to spend my life in that condition. Eventually, probably, that might lead me to leave,” he said.

    The deportation notice already includes a provision that would place Shaath under house arrest ahead of any final ruling, restrict his movement to his home municipality of Nanterre, and require him to check in “morning and evening” at the local police station. Shaath says he intends to exhaust every available legal avenue to fight the order, including taking his case to the European Court of Human Rights if necessary.

    “I will not live under intimidation. If they insisted on being a banana republic, I will insist on taking the legal route,” he said. “They want to keep me, to stop talking about Gaza and Palestine. I’m not going to do that.”

  • Looting and destruction are Israeli army’s ‘primary mission’ in Lebanon, soldiers say

    Looting and destruction are Israeli army’s ‘primary mission’ in Lebanon, soldiers say

    Fresh firsthand accounts from serving Israeli military reservists have laid bare systemic widespread looting and deliberate destruction of civilian property by Israeli troops operating in southern Lebanon, according to a new investigation published Wednesday by Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz. One reservist, who spoke to the outlet on condition of anonymity, laid out the consistent pattern of operations his unit followed: after opening fire on residential homes to clear any suspected Hezbollah fighters and confirm the area was secure, the unofficial, and in many cases primary, mission of stealing civilian property would begin. The reservist described that stolen goods ranging from fine rugs and upholstered armchairs to motorbikes and household heaters were pulled from private homes, while local shops were completely stripped of high-value merchandise. Even basic supplies used at Israeli military outposts in the region, including hand soap, were stolen from Lebanese properties, he added. Stolen spoils were stockpiled at forward outposts to be carried back to Israel when soldiers completed their tours of duty, and troops frequently argued over who would claim the most valuable items. This new account comes amid a growing tide of public reports of large-scale looting that have emerged since Israel-Hezbollah fighting escalated in March, following the joint Israeli-U.S. military strike on Iran. The issue of rampant theft by Israeli troops is not new: just one month prior, Haaretz first reported that soldiers had stolen sofas, televisions, and motorbikes from southern Lebanese households, with senior army commanders largely ignoring the practice. Earlier this month, Israeli outlet Ynet also reported that top military leaders have been unable to curb the scale of the looting across southern Lebanon. In comments made to senior commanders at a military conference last month, Israeli Army Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir publicly condemned the practice, stating, “the phenomenon of looting, if it exists, is disgraceful and could stain the entire military.” He added, “If such incidents occurred, we will investigate them. I am not willing for us to become an army of looters.” Following Zamir’s remarks, Israeli broadcaster Channel 14 reported that the chief of staff had asked frontline commanders operating in Lebanon to sign a public letter pledging to crack down on looting. However, at least one senior commander refused to sign, telling the outlet that discipline problems within the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) originate at the highest ranks of command. The reservist who spoke to Haaretz echoed this assessment, saying most senior commanders openly tolerated the looting. “The attitude was that there was no problem with looting as long as you didn’t get hurt. The higher command didn’t really try to stop us either,” he said. After initial reports of looting broke last month, the reservist said his own commanding officer ordered troops to halt theft – before entering local shops himself and smashing any remaining valuables so soldiers would have nothing left to steal. To date, no IDF soldiers have faced formal disciplinary action or punishment for participating in looting, the reservist confirmed. He added that some troops have even tried to justify the theft on religious grounds, while others argue that since most civilian properties were already slated for destruction, there was no reason to leave valuables intact. The reservist compared the IDF’s current approach to that of a historical Viking army, saying leadership allows widespread looting as a way to keep troops satisfied and willing to continue fighting. Israeli historian Adam Raz, who has extensively researched the looting of Palestinian property during the 1948 Nakba, noted last month that looting has been a consistent feature of every Israeli military campaign in the region. “What’s new is the total indifference,” Raz said. “The senior command turns a blind eye, the criminality continues, and the crime achieves its goals.” The findings from Haaretz’s latest investigation align with findings from international human rights groups. Last month, the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor said on-the-ground reports from southern Lebanon confirm a clear, organized pattern of theft during Israeli military operations. The group documented that Israeli forces regularly raid civilian homes, rummage through personal belongings, and steal cash and private property, adding that the practice has become an official, unstated policy of the Israeli state and military. Euro-Med has also documented identical patterns of looting by Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip and the occupied West Bank. In a separate incident from January, Israeli forces were reported to have stolen roughly 250 goats from Syrian territory and transferred the animals to Israeli settlement outposts in the occupied West Bank. Even after the United States-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah was announced last month, cross-border clashes and military operations have continued uninterrupted. Data from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) shows that roughly 100,000 Lebanese civilians have fled their homes in recent weeks out of fear of incoming Israeli strikes. Official figures from the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health confirm that Israeli forces have killed at least 3,020 people since the latest military offensive began in March, including 824 civilian and combatant deaths that have occurred since the April 17 ceasefire was announced. For its part, Hezbollah has killed at least 21 Israeli soldiers since March, eight of whom have died since the ceasefire, the majority of them invading troops stationed inside Lebanese territory. The new Haaretz testimonies also reveal that targeting Hezbollah fighters was not always the primary mission for Israeli troops on the ground. A second reservist told the outlet that the IDF’s core objective in southern Lebanon is not countering militant activity, but the deliberate destruction of civilian homes. “There was no reason other than revenge,” the reservist stated. He described a pre-invasion speech delivered by a battalion commander as “a pagan ritual”, adding that he had heard identical inflammatory rhetoric during previous Israeli military campaigns in Gaza and Lebanon. “When we entered the village, there were no militants. The houses were empty,” he said. “There was no fighting there at all – only operations to flatten homes.” The reservist noted that this destructive mission has been the IDF’s core focus in the region for the past two years, joking that the Israel Defense Forces should be renamed the “Israel Defence Forces for house demolitions”. He confirmed that even in areas with no sign of militant activity, soldiers still entered empty civilian homes to search for valuables to steal. According to his account, residential homes, public schools, and local clinics are destroyed without any formal military justification. Much of the demolition work is carried out by private contractors, including extreme Israeli settlers, as well as Bedouin and Druze laborers. For religiously observant soldiers in his unit, the reservist added, destroying Lebanese civilian homes is viewed as a sacred, ultimate mission. He also recounted that whenever troops raised the prospect of returning to Israeli territory, the battalion commander would respond: “This is Israel too.”