分类: world

  • Heavy rain from tropical storm raises flood risks in the Tokyo region

    Heavy rain from tropical storm raises flood risks in the Tokyo region

    A severe weather event is unfolding across east-central Japan, where Tropical Storm Jangmi has brought torrential downpours, life-threatening flood risks, and widespread disruption to critical infrastructure just as it reached the densely populated Tokyo metropolitan region on Wednesday.

    The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) confirmed that mid-morning Wednesday, the storm was positioned east of Shima City, tracking northeastward with maximum sustained winds reaching 90 kilometers per hour (55 miles per hour). This downgrade in strength came after Jangmi made landfall in Wakayama Prefecture earlier as a typhoon, packing winds of 126 kph (78 mph), before moving inland and weakening rapidly. Forecasters projected the system would hold tropical storm intensity through most of Wednesday. Before reaching Japan’s main islands, the storm passed over the southern island of Okinawa, leaving 15 people with minor injuries in its wake.

    Over a 24-hour period, the storm dumped as much as 50 centimeters (20 inches) of rain on the central Japanese Owase region. Heading into Thursday morning, the JMA warns that additional accumulations of up to 20 centimeters (8 inches) are possible across multiple areas, including the Japanese capital. In response to the rapidly deteriorating conditions, the agency has issued its highest-level flood alerts for numerous regions across central and eastern Japan, issuing urgent calls for residents in low-lying communities and along riverbanks to evacuate immediately to higher, safer ground.

    Local authorities have already activated emergency protocols. In downtown Tokyo, residents living adjacent to the Zenpukuji River received mandatory evacuation advisories. Broadcast footage from local networks shows the river’s muddy, swollen banks approaching capacity, with water on the cusp of spilling over into surrounding neighborhoods.

    The severe rainfall has already paralyzed daily life across the affected region. Surface street traffic has ground to a halt in Tokyo, hundreds of domestic and international flights have been grounded, and regional and commuter rail services have either been suspended entirely or face significant delays. Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, the primary utility provider for the capital region, reports that more than 5,000 residential properties have lost power amid the stormy conditions.

  • Women say they were raped and ransomed by fighters in Sudan’s ongoing war

    Women say they were raped and ransomed by fighters in Sudan’s ongoing war

    As Sudan’s brutal civil war stretches into its fourth year, survivors are breaking a long-standing cultural taboo to expose a horrific pattern of widespread sexual violence, abduction, and extortion being carried out by the country’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the paramilitary group blamed for the majority of these abuses. In on-the-record interviews with the Associated Press, three survivors shared graphic, harrowing accounts of their captivity, shining a new light on a crisis the United Nations has labeled one of the most defining characteristics of Sudan’s ongoing conflict.

    The first survivor, a 38-year-old woman whose identity is being protected in line with standard reporting practice for sexual assault victims, fled her besieged home in el-Fasher, Darfur, in September 2024, just weeks before RSF forces captured the city in an assault the UN has confirmed bears the hallmarks of genocide. Her husband, a soldier, had already been killed in fighting, and her brother had been shot and critically wounded, requiring urgent medical care that could not be accessed in the embattled city. As the pair traveled to seek safety, RSF fighters ambushed their convoy.

    Fighters separated women and children from male passengers, searching all men for shoulder marks that would indicate past military service. Everyone was forced to strip completely. When fighters moved to execute her wounded brother, the woman volunteered herself to take his place. She was bound, beaten, and thrown into the back of a truck alongside four other abducted women and teenage girls, who were then driven to an isolated, abandoned desert village.

    For two days, the 38-year-old and the other captives were held naked, unfed, and bound in an open shelter, unable to move and forced to lie in their own waste. Multiple RSF fighters repeatedly raped the women, entering the shelter to select victims, assault them, and rebind them afterwards. “I was thinking about ending my life,” the survivor recalled, wiping away tears during the interview.

    On the second day of captivity, her captors demanded a $1,500 ransom for her release. They gave her a mobile phone, ordering her to drain her bank account and contact relatives for additional funds. She transferred all she had, roughly $200, before being forced to reach out to her cousin on Facebook. After the cousin sent a second payment, fighters tortured the woman in front of him over a call, pressing a heated metal object into her fingernails to force more money. By the time she was released, her family had paid a total of roughly $700. Today, she remains haunted by the fates of the other women who could not raise their ransoms. Rights activists confirm most captives who cannot pay simply disappear in captivity.

    Her account is not an isolated case. A second survivor, 30, was abducted from a Khartoum market in 2024 after the RSF seized control of the capital. She was held in a remote compound for two weeks, forced to cook, clean, tend cattle and bathe fighters, and raped every single night. Even after her relative in the United States paid a $1,250 ransom, her captors initially refused to release her. Only the unexpected compassion of one fighter, who smuggled her out under cover of night, secured her freedom. “They never missed a day … I have nightmares,” she told the AP.

    The third survivor, abducted near Dilling in South Kordofan, was held for nine days, beaten and raped, before her family paid for her release in September 2024.

    International bodies and conflict analysts have confirmed these individual stories reflect a growing national crisis. The United Nations has documented that sexual assault rates have skyrocketed since the war between the RSF and Sudan’s regular military began in 2023, and that most documented abuses are linked to the RSF, with hotspots including Khartoum, Darfur, Gezira state, and increasingly, expanding conflict zones in South Kordofan. While all warring parties have been accused of sexual violence by the UN and human rights groups, the RSF has been linked to the vast majority of incidents. The RSF has not responded to repeated requests for comment on allegations of abduction, sexual assault, and ransom demands.

    The UN has also confirmed that the abduction of women for sexual slavery, followed by ransom demands for their release, has become systemic. Ransoms can reach as high as $10,000 per captive. Data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project, a U.S.-based nonprofit conflict monitoring organization, shows reported incidents of ransom-linked abductions, including those involving sexual violence, have jumped nearly 195% since the war began through May 2025, with the RSF identified as the perpetrator in most cases. Sudanese conflict analyst Mohamed Younis predicts these crimes will only become more common as the RSF fragments following a series of high-level defections from the paramilitary group’s leadership.

    For survivors and their families, the harm extends far beyond the physical and psychological trauma of assault. Local aid workers say raising ransom money pushes already vulnerable families into crushing poverty, forcing them to sell gold reserves, vehicles, and even homes to secure the release of their loved ones. Local support organizations like Bait Al Mohaba, which works with survivors of sexual and gender-based violence, report they lack the funding to provide critical support, including life-saving medical treatment for survivors.

    Aid funding gaps have been exacerbated by policy changes from the U.S. government: the previous Trump administration cut all $370 million in funding to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which provided critical support for survivors of gender-based violence in more than 25 countries including Sudan. The cut was based on unsubstantiated claims of coercive abortion ties in China that UNFPA has repeatedly rejected. While Sudan still receives more than $220 million in U.S. humanitarian funding for other needs this year, no replacement funding has filled the gap left by the UNFPA cut.

    Today, the 38-year-old survivor lives in a Khartoum displaced persons camp, reunited with her wounded brother, but still struggling to rebuild her life. She sustained internal bleeding and fluid buildup from her assault, but cannot afford the life-saving surgery she needs. She carries heavy debts to the relatives who helped pay her ransom, some of whom have since been killed in the war; she says she vows to repay the money to their children, or donate it to charity in their names, just to find peace. She has turned to supporting other survivors in the camp, mentoring women and girls who have endured similar trauma, and holds onto the hope that the graphic photos she took of her battered body after her release will one day serve as evidence to hold her attackers accountable. “I thought about seeking justice one day,” she said.

  • Sailors stressed and exhausted after months trapped by Strait of Hormuz blockade

    Sailors stressed and exhausted after months trapped by Strait of Hormuz blockade

    For Pakistani captain Hassan Khan, who asked to keep his real identity hidden for safety, the glassy calm of the Gulf waters can often lull him into a fleeting moment of normalcy — before the weight of his situation crashes back. Three months have passed since his vessel, along with roughly 1,600 other commercial ships, became trapped in or near the Strait of Hormuz after the outbreak of the US-Israeli war with Iran in late February.

    Once the beating heart of global energy trade, carrying one-fifth of the world’s daily oil and gas supplies, this vital chokepoint has been reduced to a deadly no-man’s-land. Missiles streak across the sky above while uncharted mines drift beneath the surface, bringing all commercial transit to a grinding halt. An estimated 20,000 sailors remain stuck on vessels stranded on the wrong side of the strait, cut off from the open ocean and facing a daily battle against fear, exhaustion, and growing resource scarcity.

    On Khan’s ship, the crew has attempted to cling to familiar routines to maintain some semblance of normalcy. But the old dynamic has vanished entirely. Rarely do any crew members volunteer for the infrequent, tightly restricted shore leave. Lighthearted crew banter has been replaced by tense, anxious silence, broken only by the constant vibration of mobile phones as sailors check in with frantic family members back home. Even in their sleep, crew members startle awake at the smallest unexpected noise. “The stress never leaves our minds,” Khan explained. “Everyone is worn out, completely drained both physically and mentally.”

    The logjam of trapped vessels began days after the war started, when Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz — the only navigable exit from the Gulf to the Indian Ocean — and barred all commercial traffic from passing without explicit government approval. “It’s like being stuck in a pond with only one drain, and that drain is Hormuz,” described Shafiqul Islam, captain of the Bangladesh-owned bulk carrier *Banglar Joyjatra*, which is carrying 37,000 tonnes of fertiliser bound for South Africa.

    Islam has made two attempts to exit the Gulf over the past three months, and both have ended in disappointment. Following an April 8 ceasefire announcement, Islam learned that another commercial vessel had secured passage approval from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). He steered *Banglar Joyjatra* toward the strait alongside four other trapped ships, only to be turned away by Iranian military warnings before they could reach the waterway.

    Nine days later, a second opportunity appeared to open up when Iranian officials announced the strait would be “fully open” to all commercial traffic in compliance with the ceasefire terms. But Iran abruptly reversed its decision after the United States refused to lift its ongoing naval blockade of Iranian ports. By that time, Islam’s ship was already within 30 nautical miles of the strait, and he was forced to turn back amid repeated radio warnings of imminent attacks. Islam counts himself lucky, however: just two days into the conflict, his ship was anchored only 200 meters from Dubai’s Jebel Ali Port, a facility that was targeted in an Iranian retaliatory strike. Since then, he and his 30-member crew have witnessed dozens of attacks firsthand. “Sometimes missiles pass right over a nearby ship, and other times falling debris lands on the deck of the next vessel,” Islam said. “When attacks run all through the night, none of us can even close our eyes to sleep.”

    “ We have seen horror and destruction with our own eyes,” added Rashedul Hasan, the *Banglar Joyjatra*’s chief engineer. Their fear is well-founded: the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) confirms that at least 11 sailors have been killed and one more remains missing across 39 verified violent incidents in the area.

    While the April ceasefire has reduced large-scale hostilities, the region remains on edge. Military activity continues to be a daily sight: sailors regularly spot drones, fighter jets, naval warships and submarines patrolling the waters. “The military vessels use bright searchlights and broadcast warnings over loudspeakers. They do this to deter any ship from trying to cross,” explained Sajid Masood, a Pakistani cook working on a stranded oil tanker who also requested a pseudonym for security.

    Beyond the constant threat of violence, trapped crews are facing a growing humanitarian crisis as critical supplies run short and prices skyrocket. While the Gulf’s major hubs, including Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Kuwait City, maintain established ship supply networks, delivery schedules have become completely unpredictable. For vessels that have shifted to safe anchorage off UAE ports, the cost of basic provisions has jumped exponentially. Hasan told reporters that a recent 180-tonne water delivery that would have normally cost between $1,500 and $2,000 wound up costing the crew $11,000. An anonymous South Korean sailor trapped on a different vessel accused some suppliers of price gouging, saying “it feels like many vendors are deliberately exploiting this crisis to charge inflated prices and make excessive profits.”

    The situation is set to worsen as summer approaches. Regional air temperatures already topped 30 degrees Celsius in May, and are expected to climb as high as 45 degrees Celsius in the coming months, increasing ships’ daily water demand for cooling and crew use. On Khan’s vessel, the crew still has enough staples to get by, but fresh produce and legumes have become almost impossible to source. “We can still get beef and chicken, but the easy access to fresh foods we had before is gone,” Khan said.

    For shipping companies, the crisis has already resulted in billions of dollars in lost revenue and cargo delays, and many are already planning to cut staffing costs to offset losses. For the trapped sailors, the human cost is far higher: most sailors’ employment contracts are expiring, and large-scale crew rotations have been put on hold indefinitely. Many seafarers are now rethinking their decision to work in the industry, saying the crisis has exposed just how quickly access to international waterways can become a weapon in future conflicts.

    Masood, whose contract ends in just one month, says he is now reconsidering his decades-long career at sea. But for now, his only focus is getting home to his family in Pakistan, where he planned to bring back gifts: Barbie dolls for his two daughters and a toy airplane for his young son. “I thought I would be home weeks ago, but we’re still stuck here,” he said. “Every single day my family messages asking when I’ll come home, and I have no answer to give them.”

    A small number of vessels — roughly 750 since late February, according to maritime analytics firm Kpler — have managed to secure passage through the strait. Jonathan Schroden, a researcher at Washington DC-based non-profit think tank CNA, noted that most of these successful transits are for vessels owned by companies from China, India, or Pakistan, and rely on direct government diplomacy with Tehran. “On top of diplomatic support, it appears ship owners have also paid a transit fee running into millions of dollars per vessel,” Schroden added.

    For the *Banglar Joyjatra*, diplomatic negotiations with Iran are the crew’s only path out. The Bangladeshi government has been working alongside the ship’s owner, state-run Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (BSC), to secure exit approval. Initially, BSC and the government agreed to pay the transit fee Iran demanded, but the plan collapsed after the United States threatened to impose sanctions on any entity that complied with Iran’s terms. “We are caught between two sides now,” said BSC managing director Commodore Mahmudul Hasan. “We are facing a double crisis that we can’t seem to escape.”

    Even for crew members who have managed to hold onto hope, the uncertainty of each passing day wears on. Hasan, the *Banglar Joyjatra*’s chief engineer, says he still believes the crew will get through this “critical moment” — but for thousands of trapped sailors across the Gulf, every day stuck at anchor is another day of fear, uncertainty, and waiting for a way home.

  • Putin remains uncompromising on Ukraine, but is public discourse on war changing in Russia?

    Putin remains uncompromising on Ukraine, but is public discourse on war changing in Russia?

    Five years into Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Russian state remains unapologetic in its prosecution of the war, with President Vladimir Putin doubling down on his commitment to achieve Moscow’s stated aims even as the originally planned short operation has devolved into a grinding, costly stalemate.

    The defining posture of modern Russia in 2026 is best captured by a blunt remark from popular folk singer Nadezhda Babkina, who, after receiving a state honor from Putin at the Kremlin, declared that Russia’s multi-ethnic national unity would never allow surrender, adding “Anyone who doesn’t like that can go and poison themselves.” That uncompromising tone echoes longstanding messaging from Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who once framed Russia as unashamed of its identity and actions on the global stage – a description that fits Putin himself, who has never expressed remorse for ordering the 2022 invasion and shows no intention of halting military operations.

    Just ahead of this year’s St Petersburg International Economic Forum, Russia’s flagship event designed to attract global investment and showcase the country to international audiences, Moscow launched another massive wave of missile and drone strikes across Ukrainian territory. While high-profile Western investors and political figures abandoned the forum years ago, organizers claim delegations from more than 130 countries and territories are still set to attend. Even so, a years-long active war on a neighboring country is hardly an ideal selling point for a nation courting foreign capital – a contradiction that does little to shift Moscow’s behavior.

    Putin’s public demands remain unchanged: he continues to insist Ukraine cede full control of the entire Donbas region to Russia. What has shifted, however, is Moscow’s earlier high hopes for a favorable peace deal brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump. Last year, following the Anchorage summit between Trump and Putin, senior Russian officials repeatedly praised the so-called “spirit of Anchorage”, suggesting the two leaders had reached a mutually beneficial understanding that would force Kyiv to accept Moscow’s maximalist terms. Today, that optimism has faded: Putin’s top foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov recently told Russian state television he has never used the phrase, a quiet signal that the once-touted diplomatic breakthrough has all but evaporated.

    That dashed hope is one of many factors fueling Putin’s growing frustration. What was planned as a quick, short-term “special military operation” has become a bloody war of attrition entering its fifth year, leaving Russia with massive battlefield casualties, deep economic damage from sweeping international sanctions, and eroded technological capacity. The conflict has increasingly moved into Russian territory as well: Ukrainian drones now regularly strike deep inside the country, targeting key energy infrastructure including oil refineries. A large-scale drone attack on the Moscow region last month exposed gaps in the capital’s air defense network, prompting officials to scale back the iconic annual 9 May Victory Day parade on Red Square amid security fears. Sanctions and prolonged war have also strained Russia’s public finances, with a growing budget deficit and stagnant economic output becoming persistent problems.

    Rather than drawing down military operations to address these challenges, the Kremlin has opted for escalation, as demonstrated by the recent large-scale air raids on Ukrainian cities. Moscow frames the escalation as a response to a Ukrainian strike on a building in Starobilsk, a city in occupied eastern Ukraine, which Russia says was a student dormitory that left 21 dead. Ukraine confirms it targeted the headquarters of Russia’s elite Rubicon drone unit in the area but has not confirmed whether the building matched the one Russia identified.

    As Putin prepares to address delegates at the St Petersburg forum – a traditional venue for him to lay out his worldview and criticize the West – there is no indication he will use the speech to signal any shift in Russia’s position on the war. That said, faint signs of a growing domestic debate over the future of the conflict have begun to emerge, even within Russia’s tightly controlled media ecosystem.

    Writing in *Russia In Global Affairs*, a journal closely tied to Russia’s foreign policy establishment, prominent political scientist Vasily Kashin recently concluded that the core goal of removing the current Ukrainian government is fundamentally unachievable at this stage without a long-term full military occupation of the entire country – a step that is technically out of Russia’s reach. Other Russian commentators have echoed similar uncertainty: pro-Kremlin tabloid *Moskovsky Komsomolets* quoted political analyst Alexander Nosovich noting that the expert community is split, with one camp pushing to continue the war until all stated goals are met and the other arguing it is time to end the conflict, warning that the worst outcome is not defeat, but an endless open-ended war.

    In a striking break from the dominant narrative that frames Russia as a nation defined by victory, lawyer Dmitry Krasnov argued in the same outlet that throughout Russian history, lost wars and humiliating truces have often paved the way for critical reforms, breakthroughs and eventual future victories, suggesting major geopolitical setbacks can sometimes be more useful than military triumphs. When reporters attempted to access the article online days later, it had been removed, with a 404 access denied error appearing. While a limited public discourse over the war is emerging, it still operates within clear, strict boundaries set by the Kremlin.

    With no shift in Putin’s position and no diplomatic breakthrough on the horizon, an end to the devastating conflict remains as distant as ever.

  • US reaffirms Somali sovereignty in blow to Somaliland and Israel

    US reaffirms Somali sovereignty in blow to Somaliland and Israel

    More than a year after Israel made global headlines as the first nation to formally recognize the breakaway Somali region of Somaliland as an independent state, the United States has issued a definitive policy stance that effectively shatters Somaliland’s lingering hopes for international sovereignty recognition. In a congressionally mandated report examining opportunities for expanded U.S. engagement with Somaliland, the U.S. State Department made clear that Somaliland is formally considered part of the Federal Republic of Somalia — a position that aligns with longstanding international consensus on the region’s status. The report also notes that within this territorial framework, Washington will maintain a positive, pragmatic working relationship with Hargeisa’s regional authorities and continue exploring new avenues for cooperation.

    The diplomatic chain of events that led to this moment began in November 2023, when Somaliland President Abdirahman Abdullahi Mohamed held a closed-door meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Mossad Director David Barnea, and Foreign Minister Gideon Saar in Jerusalem. One month later, on December 26, 2023, Israel officially recognized Somaliland’s sovereignty, and Saar traveled to the breakaway region shortly after the announcement to cement bilateral ties. In reciprocation, Somaliland recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and announced plans to open an embassy in the contested city, drawing vocal support from prominent pro-Israel figures in Western politics and media. Earlier this year, a delegation of high-profile Western backers including former Jewish Chronicle editor Jake Wallis Simons, Henry Jackson Society associate fellow Andrew Fox, and former UK Conservative Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson traveled to Hargeisa to attend Somaliland’s annual self-declared independence day celebrations, boosting the region’s global profile.

    Somaliland’s leadership has held out high hopes that Israel’s recognition would open the floodgates for further international backing, with the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, India, Cyprus, and Georgia targeted as next potential recognizers. For months, lobbying efforts by former Trump administration officials Tibor Nagy and Peter Pham had raised optimism among Somaliland’s political circles that Washington might also shift its position to formal recognition. However, a congressional source familiar with internal discussions told Middle East Eye that the Trump administration never signaled any willingness to break with longstanding U.S. policy on the issue, even as Somaliland courted Washington with offers of access to valuable mineral resources including lithium and coltan, both critical to global technology and energy supply chains. Analysts add that former President Trump’s well-documented public hostility toward Somalia and Somali Americans — including racist remarks labeling Somalis as “low IQ” and “crooked,” and attacking Somali American U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar as “garbage” — made any policy shift unlikely from the start.

    For Somaliland, the U.S. announcement marks a major setback to its decades-long push for independence. One anonymous Somali policy analyst who works with officials on both sides of the sovereignty dispute described the State Department report as a “consequential announcement that may effectively close the door on any lingering hopes of U.S. recognition.” The analyst noted that the decision aligns with Washington’s broader strategic ambitions across the entire territory of Somalia, arguing that “why settle for part of the cake when the whole cake remains within reach.”

    Rooble Mohamed, a communications adviser for the Somaliland government, acknowledged the current reality of U.S. non-recognition, drawing a parallel to Washington’s informal relationship with Taiwan: the U.S. does not formally recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state, but maintains extensive unofficial ties and cooperation with Taipei, an arrangement Somaliland appears willing to accept for now. When asked about the risks of aligning with Israel amid global backlash over the ongoing military campaign in Gaza that has drawn widespread condemnation, Mohamed pushed back on criticism, noting “We are one of the Muslim countries of the world, I don’t think we are different. I think it is normal to have a relationship with Israel. It does not mean the Palestinians are our enemies.” He added that after decades of unrecognized statehood, formal sovereignty recognition remains Somaliland’s top priority, and the government sees no viable alternative to its current diplomatic outreach.

    The strategic importance of Somaliland’s location on the Bab al-Mandab Strait, a critical chokepoint connecting the Red Sea and Indian Ocean that carries a third of the world’s global shipping trade, has grown dramatically in recent years amid rising Houthi activity in Yemen and escalating regional tensions with Iran. Even before the 2020 Abraham Accords normalized Israeli-UAE relations, Israeli military and intelligence operatives assisted the UAE in building a network of military bases across the Gulf of Aden to counter Iranian influence, with the key Somaliland port of Berbera serving as a central node in that network. While that network has been partially disrupted by a recent rift between the UAE and its former Yemen coalition partner Saudi Arabia, Berbera remains a key strategic asset for regional powers. Currently, UAE logistics giant DP World operates Berbera’s port, with a minority stake held by the UK government through its foreign investment arm, and Israeli and Somaliland officials are currently in talks to establish an Israeli military base at the site.

    The U.S. State Department report explicitly acknowledges Somaliland’s strategic value, noting that its location “positions it as a potential partner on shared security interests, including freedom of commercial and military navigation from the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean.” The report also notes that Somaliland authorities have actively courted U.S. investment in natural resources and prioritized infrastructure development, trade, and economic growth, pointing to ongoing expansion of Berbera’s airport and seaport that will turn the site into a major logistics hub for landlocked Ethiopia, creating new commercial opportunities for U.S. firms. Even so, the report concludes that core challenges remain: the unresolved sovereignty dispute between Mogadishu and Hargeisa, and Somaliland’s refusal to cooperate with Somalia’s federal government, create persistent barriers to foreign investment, banking access, and expanded international trade.

  • US says it fired missile at Iran-bound oil tanker

    US says it fired missile at Iran-bound oil tanker

    In the latest escalation of Washington’s naval restrictions around the Strait of Hormuz, U.S. military forces have attacked and disabled an empty oil tanker bound for Iranian waters, U.S. Central Command (Centcom) confirmed this week.

    The targeted vessel, the Botswana-flagged M/T Lexie, was struck by a Hellfire missile fired from a U.S. military aircraft after its crew disregarded repeated calls to halt and alter course, according to Centcom’s official statement. The command also published newly released surveillance footage that it says captures the moment the missile impacted the tanker’s engine compartment on Tuesday.

    As of this reporting, Iranian officials have not issued any public response to the incident, and representatives from Botswana’s government have not yet commented— The BBC has reached out to Botswana’s administration to request a statement on the attack.

    The U.S. blockade of all commercial traffic moving into and out of Iranian ports first went into effect on April 13 this year, creating heightened tensions in one of the world’s busiest and most strategically critical oil shipping chokepoints. Centcom’s latest update puts the cumulative impact of the blockade at six commercial vessels disabled through military action, with an additional 122 ships forced to change their planned routes since the restrictions were implemented. The attack marks the most recent publicly acknowledged action under the controversial blockade, which has already raised global concerns over disruption to global energy supplies and heightened conflict risk in the Persian Gulf region.

  • Italian activists escalate Mediterranean port protests over Gaza genocide

    Italian activists escalate Mediterranean port protests over Gaza genocide

    A broad coalition of pro-Palestinian activists, grassroots labor unions and solidarity organizers has launched a coordinated national mobilization in Italy, centered on the strategic Mediterranean port of Gioia Tauro in Calabria, to disrupt military supply chains they say support military actions in Gaza. The May 29 protest, branded “Global Intifada Disarm,” combined coordinated on-shore demonstrations at ports, logistics hubs and military-linked factories across the country with a symbolic maritime action, as five vessels from the Thousand Madleens to Gaza initiative sailed to Gioia Tauro to amplify their demands.

    The maritime component of the action launched a day early, when protest boats departed the nearby coastal town of Cetraro and navigated toward Gioia Tauro – one of the busiest and most logistically important container ports in the entire Mediterranean region. Speaking from one of the protest vessels, Antonio Viteritti of grassroots organizing group La Base Cosenza accused the Italian government, national institutions, and global shipping giant Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) of complicity in the crisis in Gaza by enabling military-related cargo transit through the port. Viteritti told reporters that 16 containers of dual-use ballistic steel, a material capable of being repurposed for missile manufacturing, have been held on Gioia Tauro’s docks for months, and that authorities have failed to issue a response to repeated calls to halt the shipment’s departure. He also reminded observers that two separate weapon shipments bound for Israel were seized at the same port one year prior to the 2025 action.

    Two days before the national mobilization, BDS Italy – the Italian branch of the global Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement – shared intelligence with allied trade unions and local activist networks that the container ship MSC Manasvi was scheduled to dock at Gioia Tauro to collect eight of the high-scrutiny ballistic steel containers. In what organizers framed as a major victory for direct action, the ship remained anchored offshore for multiple hours before ultimately turning back to open ocean without taking possession of the controversial cargo.

    This confrontation builds on months of escalating scrutiny over military and dual-use cargo transit through Gioia Tauro. Earlier in 2025, the “No Harbour for Genocide” campaign, backed by BDS Italy, first raised public alarms about a shipment of Indian-origin ballistic steel being transported on MSC-operated vessels, as first reported by Italian investigative outlet Altreconomia. MSC is not only one of the world’s largest container shipping firms, but also operates the primary container terminal at Gioia Tauro, putting it at the center of controversy over the port’s cargo management practices.

    Following those initial reports, Italy’s Finance Police and national Customs Agency carried out formal inspections of eight containers at the port on March 18, launching technical evaluations to classify the material as intended for civilian, dual-use, or full military applications. After the inspections concluded, Five Star Movement Member of Parliament Stefania Ascari submitted a formal parliamentary question demanding the Italian central government issue public clarification on the status of the shipment and the rigor of port control protocols.

    Peppe Marra, regional secretary of the grassroots USB union in Calabria, emphasized that sustained public pressure and media attention remain critical to preventing covert movement of military cargo to Israel through Italian infrastructure. Marra argued that continuous scrutiny prevents containers from being moved under cover of darkness at a later date, a practice he suggested may have occurred without public detection in the past. His comments echo widespread concerns across labor and solidarity groups over a lack of transparency and accountability in the management of Italy’s strategic port infrastructure and commercial cargo movements.

    Calabrian activists have framed their campaign against military supply chains as inherently connected to broader struggles for economic justice in southern Italy, linking the complicity they see in military activity to longstanding patterns of labor exploitation and systemic inequality across the Mezzogiorno. “The Mediterranean is not Israel’s, it is ours. It belongs to all those communities in the Global South that struggle every day for dignified work, quality healthcare, safe territories that are increasingly affected by climate change, and above all for a world free from war,” explained Roberto Panza of La Base Cosenza, speaking aboard one of the protest vessels. Panza added that the Global Intifada Disarm campaign calls for coordinated local action to disrupt military supply chains globally, including systematic mapping of all ports and cargo carriers moving military or dual-use materials.

    The May 29 national mobilization is the latest in a growing wave of pro-Palestinian solidarity action across Italy that began with the start of the Gaza crisis and the launch of the Global Sumud Flotilla last autumn. In recent months, mass demonstrations, university occupation campaigns, dockworker work stoppages and community solidarity initiatives have spread across every region of the country, drawing participation from students, rank-and-file workers and grassroots labor organizations. Organizers report growing cross-sector convergence between traditional labor rights struggles and pro-Palestinian solidarity mobilization, a trend on clear display at Gioia Tauro, where activists tied their opposition to the Gaza crisis to demands for full transparency over military and dual-use cargo moving through Italian public infrastructure.

  • Video shows elaborate drug-smuggling tunnel between US and Mexico

    Video shows elaborate drug-smuggling tunnel between US and Mexico

    A newly revealed surveillance video has exposed the intricate design of a sophisticated drug-smuggling tunnel constructed beneath the border between the United States and Mexico, in a case that has once again drawn sharp attention to long-standing challenges of cross-border contraband trafficking. According to updates from United States federal law enforcement officials, four individuals connected to the discovered underground passage have been taken into custody and formally charged with conspiring to traffic cocaine valued at more than $45 million. The tunnel, which was built with intentional, elaborate engineering to avoid detection for an extended period, highlights the persistent ingenuity of criminal smuggling networks that operate across the shared U.S.-Mexico boundary, a region that has remained a focal point for federal anti-narcotics enforcement efforts for decades. Investigators confirmed that the seizure of the tunnel and the subsequent arrests mark a major breakthrough in disrupting a large-scale drug trafficking operation that was moving massive quantities of cocaine into the U.S. for distribution. Federal authorities have not yet released full details of the tunnel’s exact location or construction timeline, but the released video footage offers a clear look at the carefully built underground passage that the criminal network relied on to move contraband undetected. This case underscores the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between law enforcement agencies and transnational criminal organizations that profit from the illegal drug trade in North America.

  • ‘Whole of Ukraine is in grief’ after attacks, but life in Kyiv goes on

    ‘Whole of Ukraine is in grief’ after attacks, but life in Kyiv goes on

    For nearly a week ahead of the attack, Ukrainians in Kyiv braced for what they knew could be the largest assault on their capital in months. Russian officials had openly threatened to intensify strikes against the city, prompting tens of thousands to seek nightly refuge in underground shelters.

    Reporters on the ground described being two levels below the city surface when the first blasts shook the ground, the thunder of explosions echoing through the concrete tunnels. Following the initial missile barrage came Iranian-made drones, some deployed to scout the damage from the first wave, others packed with additional explosives. A second round of missile strikes hit not long after.

    Kyiv’s metro system, which has doubled as a massive civilian bomb shelter since the start of the full-scale invasion, reported a new post-invasion record for overnight occupancy: more than 41,000 people, including nearly 4,500 children, crammed into its underground stations and tunnels to ride out the attack.

    While Russian officials consistently claim their military operations exclusively target military infrastructure, this assault followed a familiar pattern seen across dozens of prior strikes: civilian neighborhoods and infrastructure bore the brunt of the damage. When residents emerged from their shelters at dawn, they found their once-familiar communities turned into scenes of chaos and destruction. Shattered window glass crunched underfoot, and parked cars were reduced to unrecognizable, charred piles of twisted metal.

    The human cost of the assault was steep across the country. In Kyiv alone, at least six civilians were killed in the overnight attack. The deadliest toll came in the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro, where two residential apartment blocks were directly hit, killing at least 16 people. Across Kyiv and Dnipro, more than 90 people were admitted to hospitals with injuries. In Kharkiv, a northeastern city that has faced near-constant bombardment for two years, Russian strikes targeted energy facilities and civilian infrastructure, leaving 10 people injured including one child. Multiple other regions across Ukraine also reported targeted strikes.

    In Vynohradar, a typically quiet residential suburb of Kyiv, the aftermath of the attack left a landscape of complete devastation. High-rise apartment blocks had every window blown out, burnt-out car husks lined the sidewalks, and a thick haze of dust and smoke hung over the neighborhood. Local residents reported hearing at least three massive detonations in the space of an hour, and multiple neighbors were evacuated to area hospitals with critical injuries.

    Anna, a Vynohradar resident who lives in a nine-story apartment building just steps from one blast site, lost her car in the attack. But as she spoke to reporters through tears, she made clear the damage went far deeper than physical property.

    “They can repair the building, but they cannot fix our souls,” she said. “The whole building, the whole of Ukraine, is grieving. What did we ever do to deserve this?”

    In the hours after the last strike, a massive coordinated response sprung into action to clear debris and support displaced and traumatized residents. Rescue teams went door to door near the blast sites checking for casualties and trapped residents, while government-provided mental health counselors worked one-on-one with shell-shocked, tearful locals. Volunteer organizations distributed free hot meals and bottled water to residents who could not return to their damaged homes. Police cordoned off damaged high-rises to keep civilians away from falling glass and unstable structural elements.

    Near a destroyed children’s activity center, local teenage boys joined municipal workers to clear rubble, the faded purple butterflies painted on the building’s remaining broken window panes still visible through the dust.

    Even on a day marked by massive destruction, life in Kyiv quickly began returning to its new normal. Just a block away from Anna’s damaged apartment building, two small children played on a neighborhood swing set, pausing every few minutes to stare at the chaos of rescue work unfolding down the street. Further from the blast zone, road crews laid new asphalt on a city street and public buses ran on their regular schedules, as if the deadly attack that unfolded just kilometers away was just another part of daily life in wartime.

    This quiet resilience has become Kyiv’s defining response to the full-scale invasion: no matter how heavy the damage, no matter how great the loss, the city carries on with its daily routines, refusing to be broken by constant bombardment.

  • Two shot dead during Kenya protests over US Ebola centre plan

    Two shot dead during Kenya protests over US Ebola centre plan

    Deadly violence has erupted in Kenya amid widespread public opposition to a planned United States Ebola quarantine facility, leaving at least two people dead in clashes between protesters and security forces. The unrest, which has gripped affected communities across the country, unfolded after months of growing public anxiety over the proposed project, which critics say poses unquantified health risks and violates Kenyan national sovereignty over public health infrastructure.

    Witnesses on the ground report that demonstrations escalated rapidly from peaceful public gatherings to violent confrontations, with protesters blocking major roads, vandalizing public property, and clashing with law enforcement officers deployed to disperse crowds. Security forces responded to the unrest with crowd control measures that ultimately turned deadly, resulting in the fatal shooting of two protest participants. Local medical sources confirmed the deaths shortly after the clashes, and a number of additional protesters were reportedly injured during the confrontations.

    The proposed facility, which is framed by U.S. and Kenyan health officials as a collaborative public health initiative to strengthen regional preparedness for future Ebola outbreaks, has sparked intense public pushback since its announcement. Misinformation circulating on local social media platforms has fueled unfounded rumors that the facility would be used to conduct dangerous experimental research or intentionally spread the deadly virus, amplifying public anger and distrust in both national authorities and the U.S. government. Many local residents have also raised legitimate concerns about the site’s proximity to populated residential areas, warning that an accidental leak of the virus could trigger a catastrophic outbreak that would overwhelm local healthcare systems.

    As of the latest updates, Kenyan government officials have not issued a formal public statement addressing the fatal clashes, nor have they announced any changes to the planned development of the Ebola quarantine facility. Public health experts warn that the unrest highlights the critical need for transparent communication between governments, international partners, and local communities when developing cross-border public health infrastructure, noting that misinformation and lack of community engagement can quickly derail even well-intentioned global health initiatives.