分类: world

  • In Algeria, Saint Augustine’s city anticipates Pope Leo’s visit

    In Algeria, Saint Augustine’s city anticipates Pope Leo’s visit

    On Algeria’s sun-dappled Mediterranean coast, the eastern city of Annaba is buzzing with quiet anticipation and open excitement as it puts the final touches on preparations for a momentous occasion: the first ever visit by a sitting Catholic pontiff to Algeria, scheduled for April 13–15. The visit, which holds deep religious and historical weight, comes after Pope Leo XIV openly embraced his connection to Saint Augustine, one of Christianity’s most influential theologians whose life and work are deeply rooted in this corner of North Africa.

    Since his election to the papacy in May of last year, Leo XIV has repeatedly emphasized his admiration for Saint Augustine, even calling himself a “son” of the famed thinker in his inaugural address. Saint Augustine was born in 354 CE in Thagaste, an ancient settlement that is today the Algerian town of Souk Ahras, roughly 100 kilometers south of Annaba. Annaba itself sits on the ruins of Hippo Regius, the Roman city where Augustine served as bishop starting in 391, wrote his iconic autobiographical work *Confessions*, and died in 430 CE. That historical tie makes Annaba the focal point of the papal visit, and the site of the most intensive preparations.

    At the Basilica of Saint Augustine, the city’s primary Catholic shrine perched on a hill overlooking ancient Hippo’s archaeological remains, preparations have been underway for months under the direction of rector Father Fred Wekesa. Municipal maintenance crews, working alongside volunteers from the Order of Saint Augustine, have spent weeks repainting interior walls, polishing historic religious statues, and touching up the grounds to welcome the pontiff. For Annaba’s small Christian community, the visit is far more than a ceremonial event—it is a long-awaited moment of recognition.

    Father Wekesa described the upcoming arrival as an occasion of profound joy, noting that Leo XIV is the first pope to prioritize a visit to the Algerian Christian community. “We are what I call a ‘small flock’, a minority. But that does not mean we are forgotten,” he said. “On the contrary… the Pope’s presence supports us as a minority. It carries a message of encouragement and solidarity.”

    Across Annaba, which sits roughly 550 kilometers east of the capital Algiers, the entire city has joined in preparations. Roads leading to the basilica, which overlooks the ruins of the ancient Basilica of Peace where Saint Augustine once preached, are being resurfaced and repainted, transforming swathes of the city into an active construction zone in the best of ways. For many local residents, both Christian and Muslim, the visit is a point of national and civic pride. Imad, a 54-year-old Annaba resident, called the trip “a great honour for us, the Algerians of Annaba, because it is an important symbol of peace, not just for our community but for all Christians and Muslims.”

    Algerian national authorities have echoed that sentiment, attaching major strategic and symbolic importance to the visit. Preparations have been personally overseen by President Abdelmadjid Tebboune, and Father Wekesa said he has been deeply moved by the widespread spontaneous enthusiasm from ordinary Algerians, who moved quickly to extend a formal invitation as soon as the pope expressed his desire to visit.

    For Father Wekesa, the visit also offers a chance to reintroduce the world to modern Algeria, pushing back against outdated narratives that still frame the country through the lens of its 1991–2002 civil conflict, a bloody period between Islamists and state security forces that killed an estimated 200,000 people. Between 1994 and 1996, 19 Christian clerics were killed in targeted attacks, including Oran’s bishop Pierre Claverie and seven Tibhirine monks, who were beatified by the Catholic Church in 2018. Father Wekesa lamented that “all too often, some people view this country only through the lens of the ‘dark years’,” but expressed confidence the papal visit will reveal Algeria’s “true face” to the global community. “With the Holy Father’s visit… the whole world will see the hospitality and generosity of the Algerian people, and that we are capable of living together in peace,” he said.

    Not all commentary surrounding the visit has been celebratory, however. Three prominent international human rights organizations—Human Rights Watch, EuroMed Rights, and the MENA Rights Group—published a joint open letter on Tuesday calling on Pope Leo XIV to raise the issue of religious freedom repression during his meetings with Algerian authorities. The groups have documented ongoing targeting of religious minority communities in Algeria in recent years, and asked the pontiff to “call on the authorities to end discrimination against religious minorities and respect their right to freedom of religion or belief, including practicing their religion freely.”

    Despite those calls, members of Annaba’s Christian community remain focused on the unifying potential of the visit. According to Father Wekesa, most of Annaba’s Christian population is made up of sub-Saharan African scholarship students, foreign workers, and a small number of Algerian converts. Students from the University of Batna, located 270 kilometers south of Annaba, have even traveled to the city to help with final preparations ahead of the papal arrival. For Patricia Kouago, a 22-year-old student taking part in the preparations, the visit is an opportunity to build cross-community connection. “It is an occasion for Christians and Muslims to come together,” she said. “It is also a sense of solidarity that we are building. His arrival could strengthen the bonds between us.”

  • Detained aid worker Joseph Figueira Martin freed in Central African Republic

    Detained aid worker Joseph Figueira Martin freed in Central African Republic

    After 22 months of detention on controversial national security charges, a foreign aid worker has been freed from custody in the Central African Republic (CAR), his family has confirmed to the Associated Press. Joseph Figueira Martin, a dual Belgian-Portuguese national working as a consultant for U.S.-based development organization FHI 360, was released from detention on Tuesday, according to his immediate family. His brother told reporters that early confirmation of the release is solid, and the freed aid worker was expected to touch down in Lisbon, Portugal’s capital, within hours of the announcement.

    Figueira Martin was first taken into custody in May 2023, not 2024 as initially cited in some early official statements, during a security sweep in Zemio, a remote southeastern CAR town that has been trapped in chronic interethnic and anti-government violence for more than a decade. The CAR prosecutor’s office leveled serious allegations against the aid worker, including claims of espionage, unlawful collaboration with armed rebel factions, plotting to overthrow the sitting government, and endangering the country’s national sovereignty. Held in a maximum-security military prison, Figueira Martin previously launched a hunger strike to draw attention to poor and abusive conditions during his detention.

    As of Tuesday evening, CAR’s presidential administration and national law enforcement bodies had not issued an official confirmation of the aid worker’s release, nor had they offered any public comment on the future of his outstanding legal case.

    While cases of foreign aid workers being detained on national security charges remain uncommon in the country, the CAR government has ramped up regulatory and security scrutiny of international non-governmental organizations operating in conflict zones where state military forces are battling insurgent groups. In the wake of Figueira Martin’s arrest, national authorities issued a public warning that all foreign NGO personnel must avoid any activities deemed to threaten national security, or they would face formal legal prosecution.

    The release comes amid more than a decade of ongoing instability in CAR, a resource-rich central African nation that plunged into full-scale civil conflict in 2013, when a coalition of mostly Muslim rebel groups seized the capital and ousted sitting president François Bozizé. The subsequent counteroffensive by mostly Christian anti-rebel militias spiraled into widespread ethnic violence that has killed thousands and displaced millions. A 2019 nationwide peace agreement between the government and major armed factions reduced large-scale clashes, but six of the 14 original signatory armed groups have since withdrawn from the deal, restarting insurgent activity across large swathes of the countryside.

    Currently, CAR’s President Faustin-Archange Touadéra, who has held office since 2016, relies on military support from the Russian private mercenary group Wagner to hold off insurgent offensives and maintain government control over key national territory.

  • Pakistan makes last-minute bid to avert Trump threat to destroy Iran

    Pakistan makes last-minute bid to avert Trump threat to destroy Iran

    Just hours before a self-imposed deadline for massive military action against Iran, Pakistan tabled a last-minute diplomatic proposal Tuesday aimed at pulling the Middle East back from the brink of catastrophic full-scale war, after more than five weeks of escalating US-Israeli strikes across Iranian territory. The initiative comes after US President Donald Trump issued an unprecedented, chilling warning that a “whole civilization will die tonight” if his demands were not met, leaving the global community reeling from the scale of the threat.

    The White House confirmed it had received the Pakistani proposal and would issue a formal response in due course. Pakistan stepped into the mediator role as regional tensions hit a boiling point, with daily strikes crippling key Iranian infrastructure and violence spilling across neighboring borders. In a post on the social platform X, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif affirmed that diplomatic efforts to resolve the ongoing conflict were moving forward with tangible momentum, adding that substantive progress could be reached in the near term if both sides agreed to the compromise.

    Under the terms of Pakistan’s proposal, Sharif appealed directly to Trump to extend his 8:00 PM Washington time deadline by 14 days. In exchange, the plan calls for Iran to commit to reopening the Strait of Hormuz for a two-week period – the non-negotiable core demand Trump has laid out since Tehran shut down the critical global oil chokepoint in retaliation for the initial US-Israeli attacks on February 28.

    Trump’s latest threats have drawn widespread international condemnation, with even observers familiar with his history of provocative rhetoric expressing shock at the escalation. Critics have warned that the planned attacks amount to a call for genocide, and could open the door to future war crimes charges for any US service members who carry out the orders. The apocalyptic warning marked a sharp escalation from a profanity-laden post Trump shared on his Truth Social platform two days earlier, on Easter Sunday, where he threatened to destroy every bridge and power plant across Iran, a country home to 90 million people. International law defines deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure as a war crime unless the sites serve an overwhelming military purpose, a condition the US has not publicly established.

    Pope Leo XIV issued a blunt rebuke of the threat, stating that any attack targeting the entire population of Iran is “truly unacceptable.”

    While Trump prepared for a potential major strike, US Vice President JD Vance fueled speculation about unconventional military action during a speaking appearance in Budapest, noting that the US held military tools “that we so far haven’t decided to use” against Iran. The White House quickly issued a clarification to AFP, denying that Vance’s comments were a reference to nuclear weapons.

    Even ahead of Trump’s deadline, the US and Israel had ramped up daily strikes on Iranian infrastructure. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed that recent attacks targeted railways and bridges, which he claimed were being used by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. In a rare acknowledgment of error, the Israeli military issued a statement of regret after confirming that an overnight strike damaged the Rafi-Nia Synagogue in central Tehran during an operation targeting a senior Iranian commander. Iran, which is governed by Shia Muslim clerics, is home to a centuries-old Jewish community that maintains roughly 100 active synagogues across the country.

    Iranian senior officials have made clear that the country is prepared for every possible outcome of the current standoff. “No threat is beyond our preparedness and intelligence,” First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref told state media Tuesday.

    On-the-ground reporting confirms that the strikes have already killed civilians and disrupted critical transport links across Iran. Iranian authorities reported Tuesday that a US-Israeli strike on a bridge near the holy city of Qom and a second attack on a rail bridge in central Iran left two people dead. Regional officials added that a key highway connecting Tabriz in northern Iran to the capital Tehran has been completely shut down by a strike, while the Iranian Mizan news agency reported fresh damage to railway lines in Karaj, a city just outside Tehran. Early Tuesday, multiple explosions were reported across Tehran, and Iranian state media confirmed that 18 people – including two children – were killed in strikes in neighboring Alborz Province. Iran’s Mehr news agency also reported strikes on Kharg Island, the central hub of Iran’s oil export industry, though US media outlets claimed the strikes targeted only military infrastructure on the island.

    As the deadline approached, ordinary Iranians expressed a mix of fear, resignation, and defiance in interviews with AFP. University student Metanat, 27, who lost a classmate to an earlier strike, said “I feel terrified and so should everyone else in the country. Some people dismiss Trump’s ultimatums as a joke, but death is not a joke.” 62-year-old pensioner Morteza Hamidi said he felt “gloomy for the future of the country after the war,” adding that repeated threats from Trump have left many Iranians desensitized: “We are now numb to his threats.”

    In a show of public unity as the deadline neared, Iranian state media published images of thousands of Iranians forming human chains around critical power plants to shield the facilities from potential attack. The display of patriotism comes just months after Iran’s clerical leadership violently cracked down on widespread mass anti-government protests, with international human rights groups documenting over a thousand deaths in the crackdown.

    The conflict has already spilled far beyond Iran’s borders, raising fears of a full regional war. Overnight Tuesday, a strike hit a petrochemical complex in the Saudi industrial city of Jubail, a witness confirmed to AFP, just hours after similar energy infrastructure targets were hit in Iran. Loud explosions were also reported late Tuesday in central Baghdad, just kilometers from the US embassy compound in the heavily fortified Green Zone.

    Iran has responded to the US-Israeli attacks by targeting Gulf Arab states that host US military bases, while Israel has launched a full-scale ground invasion of southern Lebanon, vowing to seize territory controlled by Iranian-backed Hezbollah, which has launched thousands of rockets into Israel since the conflict began. Lebanese authorities report that the Israeli invasion has killed more than 1,500 people to date. On Tuesday, the Israeli military issued a new warning ordering all vessels in the maritime zone off southern Lebanon to move immediately north of the city of Tyre, announcing new military operations would be carried out in the area in the coming hours.

    As regional governments prepared for the worst, Israel warned its citizens of a sharply increased risk of retaliatory Iranian attacks ahead of the deadline. Kuwait urged all of its citizens to remain indoors from midnight GMT until 7 AM Wednesday, while Bahrain’s main commercial port announced it would suspend all operations starting early Wednesday over security concerns.

    The standoff centers on the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway that carries roughly one-fifth of all globally traded oil. After the initial February 28 attacks, Tehran seized control of the strait to force a response from the international community, a move that has sent global oil prices soaring and put intense domestic political pressure on Trump, who has made reopening the strait his top priority in the conflict. Trump has justified the attacks by claiming Iran is months away from building a nuclear weapon, a claim that has not been corroborated by the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog or independent nuclear analysts.

    At the United Nations Security Council last week, Russia and China vetoed a Western-backed resolution calling for the Strait of Hormuz to be reopened. The draft resolution had already been watered down to remove a provision that would have given Gulf states authorization to use military force to secure the waterway, but Beijing and Moscow still rejected the text.

    US and Israeli officials maintain that all strikes are aimed at degrading Iran’s military capabilities, and that civilian casualties are unintended consequences of the military campaign.

  • Israeli forces beat elderly Palestinian woman to death

    Israeli forces beat elderly Palestinian woman to death

    A 68-year-old Palestinian woman is dead after being violently beaten by Israeli soldiers during an early-morning incursion into her family home in the town of Jayyous, located in the northern sector of the Israeli-occupied West Bank, in an incident that underscores the mounting danger facing Palestinian civilians amid a sharp escalation of Israeli military raids across the territory.

    The incident unfolded around the pre-dawn hours of Tuesday, when Israeli forces stormed the residential property of Sabriya Shamasneh to carry out what they described as a targeted search operation, breaking into the home and interrogating members of the extended family on-site. Sabriya’s husband, Walid Shamasneh, recounted the chaotic moments leading up to the military incursion to local reporters: his daughter-in-law had first raised the alarm after spotting suspicious activity outside, believing intruders or thieves had entered the property after forcing open the front garden gate and generating unidentifiable noises.

    Before the family could react, Israeli soldiers breached the home’s locked front door, sending the entire household into immediate panic. According to Walid’s account, the commanding Israeli officer began demanding he provide identities of people Walid did not recognize, before the entire family was forced into a single corner of the main room while soldiers ransacked the residence’s other bedrooms in their search.

    The confrontation turned fatal when Sabriya tried to shift position and called out to her son Hassan, who she feared was being taken into custody by the raiding party. In response, soldiers violently shoved the elderly woman with the butts of their rifles, throwing her to the hard floor and screaming commands for her to stay silent. Sabriya’s head crashed into a nearby wall during the fall, and she immediately lost consciousness. A panicked Walid shouted for help and begged soldiers to provide medical assistance, but their requests were ignored by the Israeli forces.

    Once the military operation concluded and soldiers withdrew from the property, Walid and his son rushed Sabriya to the nearby Darwish Nazzal Governmental Hospital in Qalqilya. An ambulance could not reach the scene of the incident due to the heavy deployment of Israeli military vehicles blocking access to the area, forcing the family to transport her on their own. Upon arrival at the medical facility, medical staff pronounced Sabriya dead from the blunt force injuries she sustained during the raid, leaving her relatives and the broader local community reeling from sudden shock.

    The family has delayed Sabriya’s funeral to allow her daughter, who currently resides in Jordan, to travel to the West Bank to pay her final respects before burial. The entire town of Jayyous has joined the Shamasneh family in mourning over the killing.

    The fatal assault on Sabriya was not the only violence recorded during Tuesday’s raid on Jayyous, which sits east of Qalqilya. A young Palestinian man was also attacked by soldiers during the incursion, leaving him with multiple bruises and broken bones.

    Local Palestinian observers and residents have documented a sharp recent escalation in Israeli military incursions into Palestinian towns and villages across the occupied West Bank, alongside marked increases in the level of aggression soldiers display during house searches and raids, including routine physical assaults on civilian residents. These frequent incursions have also been paired with widespread mass arrest campaigns carried out by Israeli forces in Qalqilya and surrounding areas over recent weeks, which have targeted dozens of Palestinian people, including multiple women.

    The day before the fatal Jayyous raid, on Monday, Israeli forces arrested multiple relatives of Palestinians who had previously been killed by Israeli forces in the Qalqilya area, including the mothers of the deceased. The move has been widely condemned as an intentional act of collective intimidation that punishes family members even after their relatives have been killed.

    Just last month, the Israeli military detained 15 women from Qalqilya and its neighboring rural areas, including the wives of imprisoned Palestinians and local political activists. While most of the detained women have since been released, one remains held in Israeli administrative detention, a policy that allows Israeli authorities to hold prisoners indefinitely without formal charges or trial.

    This killing also marks the second death of an elderly Palestinian woman during an Israeli house raid in less than two months. Back in November, 80-year-old Haniya Hanoun died after Israeli soldiers stormed her family home in al-Mazraa al-Gharbiya, a village north of Ramallah, beat her severely in front of her family members, and arrested her grandson during the incursion.

  • Trump tells Iran: ‘A whole civilization will die tonight’

    Trump tells Iran: ‘A whole civilization will die tonight’

    Tensions in the Middle East reached a fever pitch on Tuesday as former U.S. President Donald Trump issued an unprecedented apocalyptic threat to Iran, warning that the country’s entire civilization could cease to exist by nightfall unless Tehran agrees to a surrender deal to end the ongoing regional conflict. The alarming warning came as the global community held its collective breath, watching closely to see if aggressive rhetoric would translate into full-scale military escalation after Trump had set a deadline for Iran to reopen the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.

    In a post to his Truth Social platform, Trump doubled down on his increasingly belligerent rhetoric toward the Islamic Republic. “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will,” he wrote. The former president added that Tuesday would stand as one of the most consequential moments in modern world history, leaving global leaders and populations on edge over the prospect of catastrophic regional war.

    Parallel to Trump’s threats, multiple regional reports confirmed that Israeli forces have already launched widespread targeted strikes against Iranian infrastructure, hitting civilian and key transport sites across the country. According to Iran’s semi-official Mehr News Agency, an explosive projectile struck a residential building in the city of Shahriar, leaving at least nine people dead and 15 others injured. A separate Israeli attack targeted the Yahya Abad railway bridge in the central city of Kashan, killing two additional people. These strikes mark a significant expansion of Israeli military action within Iranian territory, deepening an already volatile conflict that began when U.S. and Israeli forces launched a joint assault on Iran in late February.

    Trump’s posture toward Iran has grown increasingly erratic over the past seven days, with the former president swinging wildly between vague hints that a negotiated settlement was within reach and extreme threats of total destruction. Just days prior on Sunday, he released a profanity-laced tirade on Truth Social, calling Iranian leaders “crazy bastards” and demanding they immediately reopen the “fuckin’ strait” of Hormuz or face “hell.”

    The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway that carries roughly 20% of the world’s daily oil supplies and serves as a critical chokepoint for global energy trade, was closed shortly after the U.S.-Israeli assault on Iran began in late February. Its closure has already sent shockwaves through international energy markets, disrupting supply chains and driving up crude prices worldwide. On Tuesday alone, following unconfirmed reports of strikes on Kharg Island—Iran’s primary oil export hub in the Persian Gulf—U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude prices jumped by more than 2%, exacerbating already widespread market volatility.

    In response to the escalating threats, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a stark warning of its own Tuesday, carried live on Iranian state television. The paramilitary force made clear that any further crossing of Tehran’s “red lines” by Washington would trigger a retaliatory response that extends far beyond the Middle East region. “If the American terrorist army crosses the red lines, our response will go beyond the region,” the statement read. The IRGC added that it would target regional energy infrastructure in order to cut off U.S. and allied access to Middle Eastern oil and gas for years, and noted that Iran’s previous self-imposed limits on retaliation have been lifted, with no more restraint remaining. The warning also extended to regional partners of the United States and Israel.

    Despite the escalating violence, there have been small signs of diplomatic movement in recent days. Tehran announced last Thursday that it is working alongside Oman to draft a peacetime protocol to oversee maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, which would go into effect only after the conflict with the U.S. and Israel comes to an end. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi confirmed the plan to Russian state media, according to Iran’s official IRNA news agency. Last week, an Iranian parliamentary committee also approved measures to impose shipping tolls on all vessels transiting the strait, and implement a full ban on U.S. and Israeli-flagged ships from entering the waterway.

    This report is compiled from independent on-the-ground and open-source reporting on the fast-developing regional crisis.

  • Trump threatens Iran’s ‘whole civilization will die tonight’ as war escalates

    Trump threatens Iran’s ‘whole civilization will die tonight’ as war escalates

    Tensions between the United States, its ally Israel and Iran have surged to a new dangerous peak after former U.S. President Donald Trump issued an unprecedented, extreme threat targeting the entire Iranian civilization. In a public post shared to his social media platform Truth Social on Tuesday morning, Trump warned that “a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again” – a comment tied to his self-imposed deadline for Iran to reach a new negotiation deal and reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz. He added that while he does not want the catastrophic outcome to unfold, he believes it is likely to occur.

    The incendiary statement comes amid a rapidly deteriorating security landscape that has already pushed the long-running US-Israeli confrontation with Iran to the brink of open large-scale war. The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway that connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, is one of the world’s most vital chokepoints for global energy trade, with roughly a fifth of the world’s total oil consumption passing through the corridor daily. Any sustained closure of the strait or a full-scale military conflict in the region would send shockwaves through global energy markets and risk dragging regional and global powers into a broader, destabilizing war. As of the update on April 7, 2026, no immediate official response from Iranian authorities has been reported, and the international community is on high alert for rapid developments that could reshape global security in the coming hours.

  • War in the Middle East: latest developments

    War in the Middle East: latest developments

    In a rapidly escalating conflict that has sent shockwaves across the global community, the Middle East is facing one of its most volatile security crises in recent years, marked by a joint US-Israeli strike on Iran’s capital Tehran that left visible destruction on April 7, 2026. As the conflict approaches a critical turning point following a US ultimatum to Iran, developments are unfolding by the hour, drawing condemnation, warnings, and intervention from world leaders and international bodies.

  • Israeli strikes on Gaza school kill 10 as health crisis deepens under siege

    Israeli strikes on Gaza school kill 10 as health crisis deepens under siege

    Five months after a ceasefire agreement was reached between Israeli forces and Hamas to de-escalate conflict in the Gaza Strip, repeated violations by Israeli military operations have sent civilian casualty numbers soaring and pushed the enclave’s already collapsing healthcare system to the brink of total failure. The most recent deadly incident unfolded Monday, when Israeli fighter jets launched an airstrike on a school in the Gaza Strip, leaving 10 Palestinians dead.

    Local media reports outline the sequence of events that led to the strike: Israeli-backed armed factions first launched a raid on the school, located east of the Maghazi refugee camp in central Gaza, with the stated goal of locating and abducting individuals on their target list. Local residents confronted the raiding groups, triggering intense armed clashes in the immediate area. In line with its longstanding practice of supporting its allied armed groups when they face resistance in Gaza, the Israeli military ordered airstrikes on the clash site, resulting in the 10 civilian fatalities.

    Palestinian health authorities confirmed Tuesday that the 10 deaths marked just a fraction of Israeli-inflicted casualties over the preceding 24-hour period, with an additional 144 Palestinians injured in separate operations across the enclave. This violence followed a deadly incident just one day prior, when seven Palestinians were killed including a United Nations contractor who worked as a driver for a World Health Organization (WHO) aid convoy that was targeted in an Israeli strike.

    WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus released a statement expressing that he was “devastated” by the killing of the contractor, noting that an official investigation into the attack is currently underway. In the wake of this fatal incident targeting UN and WHO personnel, the United Nations has suspended its coordination of patient transfers from Gaza to Egyptian medical facilities through the Rafah border crossing. This suspension has drastically worsened the plight of an estimated 15,000 critically wounded and ill Gazans who are waiting for urgent medical care that is unavailable inside the blockaded enclave.

    Data from Palestinian officials shows that ceasefire violations have become routine for Israeli forces over the past five months. Since the ceasefire was signed, Israeli operations have killed at least 733 Palestinians, 223 of whom are children. Since the full-scale conflict began in October 2023, more than 72,300 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces, and more than 170,000 have sustained injuries, according to official Palestinian counts.

    Even with the ceasefire in place, Israeli military authorities continue to enforce near-total restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid and essential goods into Gaza. In addition to blocking aid, Israeli officials also restrict the number of sick and wounded Gazans who are allowed to travel to Egypt for life-saving medical treatment.

    The Palestinian Ministry of Health has issued a stark warning that the ongoing Israeli restrictions on medical aid and patient evacuations have pushed Gaza’s medical crisis to a catastrophic tipping point. Shortages of critical supplies have reached unprecedented critical levels: only 50% of all essential medications are currently available to care providers, and more than 70% of all laboratory testing supplies have been completely depleted.

    Oncology services, which serve 4,100 Gazan cancer patients, are among the hardest hit, with a 61% shortage of specialized life-saving cancer drugs. Core medical services including primary care, neurology, nephrology, surgery, and intensive care all face essential drug shortages exceeding 40%. Critical cardiac procedures including open-heart surgeries and cardiac catheterisations have been completely halted due to a total lack of necessary resources. Additionally, 89% of all ophthalmic surgical supplies are no longer available, cutting off care for thousands of patients at risk of blindness. Overall hospital bed capacity across the Gaza Strip has fallen by more than 55%, even as the number of injured and ill patients continues to climb steadily with each new Israeli military incursion and strike.

  • China urges immediate ceasefire amid escalated Iran conflict

    China urges immediate ceasefire amid escalated Iran conflict

    As hostilities between Iran, Israel and the United States escalate sharply ahead of a US-imposed deadline for Tehran, the international community is racing to push for de-escalation and a return to diplomatic negotiations, with China leading calls for an immediate end to all fighting.

    In an official press briefing held on April 7, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning outlined China’s consistent stance on the spiraling crisis, emphasizing that the only sustainable path forward lies in political dialogue rather than military force. She pointed to the unlawful use of force by the United States and Israel against Iran, a violation of core principles of international law, as the fundamental root of the current heightened tension.

    “Force cannot bring peace,” Mao Ning stated. “The immediate priority is to secure a ceasefire, stop the fighting and return to the track of dialogue and negotiation in order to address the issue at its root and restore peace and stability in the Gulf region.”

    Mao noted that the rapidly deteriorating situation in the Middle East has already placed significant downward pressure on the global economy and threatened global energy security, triggering widespread concern across the international community. Since the conflict erupted, China has maintained an objective, fair and balanced position, and has worked consistently to facilitate a ceasefire. To advance diplomatic efforts, Foreign Minister Wang Yi has held 26 phone consultations with key stakeholders across the region, including officials from Iran, Israel, Russia and Gulf nations, while China’s special envoy for Middle East affairs has conducted intensive shuttle diplomacy across the region. Most recently, China and Pakistan jointly put forward a five-point peace initiative that reflects the broad international consensus in support of ending the war.

    Pakistan’s own diplomatic mediation efforts have reached a critical and sensitive stage, Reza Amiri Moghadam, Iran’s ambassador to Pakistan, confirmed in a post on the social platform X on Tuesday.

    The United Nations has also sounded the alarm over escalating rhetoric from Washington that threatens targeted attacks on Iranian energy and civilian infrastructure should Tehran refuse to accept a US-brokered deal ahead of the Trump administration’s deadline. UN Secretary-General spokesperson Stephane Dujarric told reporters on Monday that the UN is deeply alarmed by public threats targeting power plants, bridges and other civilian infrastructure.

    Dujarric reiterated that UN Secretary-General has repeatedly reaffirmed his commitment to upholding international law, and urged all parties to fully abide by their legal obligations during armed hostilities. “Civilian infrastructure, including energy infrastructure, must not be attacked,” Dujarric said, noting that even in cases where civilian infrastructure is incorrectly classified as a military target, international humanitarian law prohibits any attack that would be expected to cause excessive harm to civilian lives and property. “There is no viable alternative to the peaceful settlement of international disputes,” he added, echoing calls for an immediate end to hostilities.

    On April 6, US President Donald Trump claimed that indirect negotiations with Iran were “going well” while also threatening that the US could “take out” Iran’s military capabilities in a single night. As the deadline approaches, Iranian leaders have issued firm responses signaling national unity in the face of external threats. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote on X on Tuesday that more than 14 million Iranians have already declared their readiness to defend the country, adding “I, too, have been, am and will be a sacrificer for Iran.”

    Ebrahim Zolfaghari, spokesperson for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, dismissed Trump’s threats as baseless, saying hostile rhetoric would not deter Iran from its military operations targeting US and Israeli assets, according to a report from Al Jazeera. Mahdi Mohammadi, an advisor to Iran’s parliamentary speaker, gave the US a stark 20-hour ultimatum, warning that if Washington does not stand down, “his allies will return to the Stone Age.”

    Iran’s Red Crescent confirmed Tuesday that US and Israeli strikes have hit 17 civilian areas across Iranian territory, calling the targeting of defenseless civilians an unjustifiable war crime under international law. Iranian media reports that at least 15 civilians were killed in overnight attacks, which targeted sites including a residential neighborhood in northern Tehran, a Jewish synagogue in central Tehran’s Enghelab district, Mehrabad International Airport, commercial areas in the Molavi district and a transport hub on Hakim Highway.

    As fast-paced tit-for-tat strikes and threats continue to dominate the region, de-escalation efforts have consistently been overshadowed by new violence. On Monday, Reuters reported that Pakistan put forward a two-stage peace plan that includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz to end US and Israeli attacks on Iran. Even as diplomatic talks continue, Gulf nations have spent days fending off cross-border attacks: Saudi Arabia’s defense ministry confirmed it intercepted and destroyed 18 incoming drones in the past 24 hours on April 7. The King Fahd Causeway, a critical transport link connecting Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, was temporarily closed after Iranian strikes targeted Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province, but reopened hours later. Air raid sirens sounded across Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates as the region remained on high alert for an escalation of hostilities between Iran and the US-Israeli alliance.

    Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani met with visiting Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi on Monday, and emphasized the urgent need for enhanced regional cooperation to bring all parties back to the negotiating table. He called for global leaders to prioritize dialogue and reason to contain the crisis, ensuring global energy security, freedom of navigation, environmental protection and long-term regional stability.

    Across central Israel, rescue teams have been deployed to the sites of Iranian ballistic missile impacts in Rosh Haayin, Ramat Hasharon and other population centers. The Israeli Defense Forces confirmed it carried out a strike on a key petrochemical facility in Shiraz, claiming the site produced critical chemical components for explosives and ballistic missile development. The IDF added that it also struck a large ballistic missile deployment site in northwestern Iran in the same operation.

    As the deadline passes and hostilities continue to escalate, the international community remains on edge, warning that a full-scale regional war could have catastrophic consequences for global energy markets and international security.

  • Israel’s war on Lebanon: What exactly is the ‘Dahieh Doctrine’?

    Israel’s war on Lebanon: What exactly is the ‘Dahieh Doctrine’?

    Israel’s recent intensification of military operations against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon has triggered a devastating humanitarian crisis, with official casualty counts topping 1,300 people killed and more than one million residents displaced from their homes. Intensive Israeli airstrikes have leveled critical civilian infrastructure across southern Lebanon, including residential neighborhoods, places of worship, medical facilities, and key bridge crossings over the Litani River. One of the most heavily targeted areas has been Dahieh, the densely populated southern suburbs of Beirut, a site that holds outsized significance for Israeli military strategy: it was here that the Israeli Defense Forces first formally put the so-called “Dahieh Doctrine” into practice two decades ago.

    This controversial military strategy has since been systematically deployed by Israel across multiple conflict zones, most infamously in its ongoing military campaign in the Gaza Strip that began in October 2023, which has killed more than 72,000 people to date, the vast majority of them civilians. Even before the current Lebanon offensive launched on March 5, Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich explicitly teased the coming application of the doctrine in a video posted to X, stating that “very soon Dahieh will look like Khan Younis” — the decimated southern Gazan city that has been reduced to ruins by months of Israeli bombardment. This analysis from Middle East Eye unpacks the origins, implementation, and global legal standing of the polarizing Israeli military tactic.

    At its core, the Dahieh Doctrine advocates for the use of massively disproportionate force against civilian populations and civilian-held infrastructure in areas where armed groups are alleged to operate. The strategy’s explicit goal is to inflict widespread suffering on local civilian communities to stoke domestic resentment against the armed group in question — whether that is Hezbollah in Lebanon or Hamas in Gaza — and ultimately deter future attacks against Israeli territory.

    Dahieh, located immediately south of central Beirut, is a densely packed urban neighborhood whose population is overwhelmingly Shia Muslim, with a smaller share of residents from other Lebanese communities. A large share of the area’s residents identify as Hezbollah supporters or voters, and it also hosts many active members of the group. Many analysts, including prominent American economist Paul Krugman, traced the doctrine’s intellectual roots back to the U.S. military’s “shock and awe” strategy, which was deployed during the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

    The term “shock and awe” was first coined by military theorists Harlan K. Ullman and James P. Wade in a 1996 academic work. The framework argues that displays of overwhelming, overwhelming force can quickly overwhelm and demoralize both enemy combatants and the civilian population supporting them. The strategy explicitly targets core civilian infrastructure, including communication networks, transportation hubs, food production systems and water supplies to cripple everyday function in enemy-held territory. In the 2003 Iraq invasion alone, more than 6,700 Iraqi civilians were killed in the initial invasion phase, and cumulative civilian deaths across the entire subsequent conflict are estimated to reach at least 200,000. Ullman and Wade themselves cited earlier historical precedents for the approach, including the 1945 U.S. nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the 1994 Russian assault on Grozny during the First Chechen War.

    Unlike formal, publicly documented Israeli military doctrines, the Dahieh Doctrine was first outlined explicitly by Israeli military officials and independent analysts in the aftermath of Israel’s 2006 war on Lebanon. During that conflict, Israel justified widespread bombardment across Lebanon after Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers. Then-Israeli Major General Udi Adam, who commanded the 2006 operation against Hezbollah, stated publicly in July 2006 that “once it is inside Lebanon, everything is legitimate – not just southern Lebanon, not just the line of Hezbollah posts.” Over the 33-day 2006 war, Israel killed more than 1,200 people and wounded more than 4,400, with the worst destruction concentrated in Dahieh, where Israeli bombing destroyed more than 15,000 residential homes.

    Major General Gadi Eisenkot, who served as Head of Israeli Military Operations during the 2006 assault, later went on to become IDF Chief of Staff from 2015 to 2019 and a cabinet minister in Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right government from 2023 to 2024. In October 2008, two years after the end of the Lebanon war, Eisenkot openly confirmed the doctrine’s core principle: “What happened in the Dahieh quarter of Beirut will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on. We will wield disproportionate power against every village from which shots are fired on Israel, and cause immense damage and destruction. From our perspective, these are military bases. This isn’t a suggestion. This is a plan that has already been authorized.”

    That same week, Tel Aviv University’s Institute for National Security Studies published a landmark report by Israeli Colonel Gabriel Siboni titled “Disproportionate Force: Israel’s Concept of Response in Light of the Second Lebanon War” that formalized the doctrine. The report argued that “with an outbreak of hostilities, the IDF [Israeli military] will need to act immediately, decisively, and with force that is disproportionate to the enemy’s actions and the threat it poses. Such a response aims at inflicting damage and meting out punishment to an extent that will demand long and expensive reconstruction processes.” The report added that disproportionate force was necessary “to make it abundantly clear that the State of Israel will accept no attempt to disrupt the calm currently prevailing along its borders.”

    Israel has deployed this strategy repeatedly against civilian populations in the Palestinian territories, which it has occupied illegally under international law since 1967. In Gaza, data from the United Nations Satellite Centre shows that Israeli bombardment has destroyed roughly 80 percent of all structures across the strip, including residential homes, schools, hospitals, sewage treatment plants and marketplaces. Just three days into the October 2023 Israeli campaign, IDF spokesperson Daniel Hagari publicly confirmed the strategy’s priorities, stating: “While balancing accuracy with the scope of damage, right now we’re focused on what causes maximum damage.”

    As the current Lebanon offensive has expanded, Israel has already renewed heavy strikes on Dahieh itself, echoing the 2006 destruction. Before the 2023 Gaza war, Israel deployed the Dahieh Doctrine in two major prior offensives in Gaza. During the 2008-2009 invasion, Israel killed more than 1,400 Palestinians, destroyed more than 4,000 residential homes, and deployed white phosphorus munitions — weapons that cause permanent, often fatal burns — in densely populated civilian areas; just 13 Israelis were killed in the conflict. In the 2014 Gaza war, Israel killed more than 2,000 Palestinians, two-thirds of whom were confirmed civilians, including more than 500 children and nearly 300 women.

    Under core international humanitarian law treaties, the deliberate targeting of civilian populations and civilian infrastructure is explicitly classified as a war crime. Article 48 of the Fourth Geneva Convention requires that “The Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants.” Article 51 further prohibits any attack “which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.”

    The Rome Statute, which establishes the legal framework for the International Criminal Court (ICC) and codifies the international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, also explicitly bans disproportionate attacks on civilian communities. The statute prohibits “intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated.” Currently, ICC arrest warrants are active for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, accusing the pair of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity during Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza.

    The Dahieh Doctrine was formally identified and condemned by the 2009 Goldstone Report, a United Nations fact-finding commission investigation into Israel’s 2008-2009 Gaza war. The commission found that Israeli strategy during the conflict was “designed to punish, humiliate and terrorize a civilian population” and added: “The tactics used by the Israeli armed forces in the Gaza offensive are consistent with previous practices, most recently during the Lebanon war in 2006. A concept known as the Dahiya doctrine emerged then, involving the application of disproportionate force and the causing of great damage and destruction to civilian property and infrastructure, and suffering to civilian populations. The Mission concludes from a review of the facts on the ground that it witnessed for itself that what was prescribed as the best strategy appears to have been precisely what was put into practice.”

    The doctrine has also faced repeated condemnation from leading international human rights experts, including Richard Falk, the former United Nations Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights. Writing in April 2024, six months into Israel’s ongoing Gaza campaign, Falk noted that there was not “the slightest effort on Eisenkot’s part to reconcile the Dahiya Doctrine with international humanitarian law, which imposes a limit of proportionality on any use of force in situations of international combat.”