分类： world

A new report from Sweden-based human rights organization Repatriate the Children (RTC) has sounded a fresh alarm over steeply escalating violence, intimidation, and degrading treatment against women and children detained at northeastern Syria’s Roj Camp, the country’s last major detention facility for foreign nationals alleged to have ties to the Islamic State group. The report, based on first-hand testimonies collected from more than 40 women of diverse nationalities held at the camp between January and May 2026, confirms that human rights violations against detainees have grown significantly in both frequency and severity since the start of the year.

Located near the Iraqi border in Syria’s northeastern Hasakah province, Roj Camp is currently co-administered by the Democratic Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). It became the sole major camp for foreign families linked to former IS fighters after the larger Hol Camp ceased operations in January 2026, amid shifting territorial control as Syria’s new Damascus government under President Ahmed al-Sharaa reclaims authority over Kurdish-held areas that have been self-governed for much of Syria’s decade-long civil war. As of mid-2026, the camp holds 2,373 people across 769 households representing 54 nationalities; the vast majority of detainees are third-country nationals, neither Syrian nor Iraqi. Official United Nations data from late 2025 confirms that children make up 63% of the camp’s population, with women accounting for another 35%, and men just 2%.

Multiple detainees interviewed for the report described a daily reality shaped by unrelenting fear and abuse. Nightly armed raids by camp security have become routine, during which guards conduct widespread ransacking of tents, confiscate or steal personal property including money, mobile phones, food, and even a community-funded generator, carry out unprovoked beatings, and separate children from their parents. Detainees report being warned that snipers posted on camp towers will shoot anyone who leaves their tent during raids, leaving families trapped in constant terror as they wait to see if their tent will be targeted next. Women detailed additional degrading treatment, including having cold water poured over them during winter to intensify exposure to freezing temperatures, and consistent verbal abuse that includes guards telling detainees “there are no human rights” and taunting them to ask God for rescue.

Many detainees linked the sharp deterioration in conditions to broader regional instability following the SDF’s territorial losses earlier this year. “It is like they are taking out all of their frustration on us. And we cannot do anything to protect ourselves,” one detained woman told RTC researchers. Beyond physical violence, basic services in the camp have also collapsed: widespread electricity shortages, inadequate access to healthcare, and failure to meet basic nutritional needs have left detainees in increasingly desperate condition. One woman reported that a French national held at the camp died in April after guards denied her care for severe headaches, leading to a fatal heart attack. Detainees described crippling psychological harm, with many noting that constant fear has destroyed their mental health, leaving them trapped in what one called a “live horror movie.”

Children, who make up the majority of the camp’s population, have borne the brunt of the escalating abuse. Multiple testimonies documented children being beaten, threatened with death, and separated from their parents for days or weeks without explanation. In one case, a 12-year-old boy was held for three days, returned with visible bruising from beatings, and told he would be killed if he spoke about the experience. In another, guards beat a mother and her three young daughters with iron sticks during a night raid before detaining all of the children. In some instances, children are only returned to their families after demands for bribes, and families who inquire about detained relatives are met with threats of extended detention. Many mothers have gone to extreme lengths to prepare for potential separation: one woman wrote her family’s home country contact details on her children’s arms, so they could be identified if they were separated during a raid.

RTC co-founder Beatrice Eriksson told Middle East Eye that the situation has reached a crisis point, noting that the international community has largely normalized the prolonged detention of these families. “We’re not talking about a temporary emergency. We’re talking about children who have spent years growing up behind fences. And it seems that the world has gradually become used to it and accepted this situation,” Eriksson said. “It’s very dark for many of these children because they’re so young.”

Longstanding arguments from Western governments that repatriation of their citizens is impossible because the camps are controlled by non-state armed groups no longer hold, the report emphasizes. Following the collapse of the Assad government and the January 2026 agreement between Damascus and the SDF, the internationally recognized Syrian government now holds increasing influence over northeast Syria, creating new diplomatic pathways to resolve the crisis. Eriksson argues that the only barrier to repatriation now is a lack of political will, noting that international law guarantees detainees the right to return to their countries of origin. She also called out European governments for hypocrisy: many demand that Damascus accept the deportation of Syrian nationals from Europe, while refusing to repatriate their own citizens held in Roj Camp.

“Governments must just take responsibility for their own citizens. If anyone is suspected of a crime, investigate them. If they can be prosecuted, prosecute them. But children shouldn’t spend their entire childhood detained just because governments are reluctant to deal with a politically difficult issue,” Eriksson said. The report warns that continued failure to repatriate perpetuates widespread harm and intergenerational trauma, leaving detainees exposed to violence, exploitation, human trafficking, and recruitment by armed groups. From a counterterrorism perspective, the report concludes, prolonged unlawful detention in catastrophic conditions does not reduce risk—it creates new risk. Neglect leaves vulnerable detainees desperate for support, Eriksson noted, increasing the chance they may turn to extremist groups for help. “We need to break this cycle of violence,” she said.

Despite the new opportunities for repatriation, only two repatriations have been carried out at Roj Camp since January 2026, both to Australian citizens, one in April and one in May. Middle East Eye has contacted both the Syrian government and Kurdish regional officials to request comment on the allegations in the report, and as of publication, no response has been received. International human rights bodies have long flagged dangerous conditions in northeast Syria’s detention camps: UN experts have previously warned that conditions in Roj and Hol camps may qualify as cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, while Amnesty International has documented repeated allegations of gender-based violence against female detainees.

Just 24 hours after the United States and Iran finalized a broader agreement aimed at ending cross-regional hostilities, a dramatic surge in clashes between Israel and Lebanon’s Hezbollah pushed the Middle East to the brink of a wider regional war, before the two parties agreed to a ceasefire that took effect at 4 p.m. local time Friday.

Diplomatic efforts to broker the truce were led by intensive backchannel negotiations and calls mediated by both Washington and Tehran, a source with direct knowledge of Hezbollah’s position confirmed to Middle East Eye. The breakthrough came only after Tehran threatened to pull out of planned follow-up talks with U.S. negotiators scheduled in Geneva in response to heavy Israeli airstrikes across Lebanon, the source added. The agreement remains conditional on Israel abiding by its terms, the source emphasized.

A senior Israeli official confirmed the truce to Reuters, noting that the ceasefire would hold only so long as Hezbollah halts all attacks on Israeli targets. The official also confirmed that Israeli military forces will remain positioned in areas of southern Lebanon they have seized during recent advances.

The rapid escalation that preceded the ceasefire began Thursday night, when Hezbollah fighters ambushed advancing Israeli troops near Ali al-Taher, a strategically critical hilltop outpost just outside the southern Lebanese city of Nabatieh. The ambush left four Israeli service members dead, including a senior battalion commander, and multiple others wounded, the Israeli military confirmed. Hezbollah claimed responsibility for the attack, stating its fighters had used both ambushes and drone strikes to repel the Israeli advance into the area.

Israel responded within hours with a massive wave of airstrikes that hit more than 80 targets across southern and eastern Lebanon. By Friday morning, Lebanon’s Ministry of Health reported that at least 47 civilians and combatants had been killed in the bombardment, with another 39 people wounded across 11 affected towns. Rescue teams have been unable to reach trapped survivors due to ongoing shelling, health officials warned, adding that the final casualty count is expected to climb.

Seven people were killed in the southern Lebanese village of Harouf alone, with additional residents still believed to be trapped under collapsed buildings, health ministry sources told Middle East Eye. Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency documented mass displacement from the southern districts of Tyre and Bint Jbeil, as thousands of residents fled north to escape the violence. Many of those fleeing had only just returned to their home villages in the days after the U.S.-Iran interim agreement was reached earlier this week.

Hezbollah officials argue that the scale and scope of Israel’s retaliation went far beyond a proportional response to the ambush, suggesting the assault was a deliberate attempt to derail the broader U.S.-Iran regional peace deal. The U.S.-Iran agreement has already sparked fierce backlash in Israel, where political leaders across the ruling coalition have condemned it as a strategic victory for Tehran.

“If this were merely a response to the ambush, then why did Israel also strike Baalbek and the Bekaa Valley in eastern Lebanon?” a second Hezbollah source asked, pointing to the geographic spread of attacks far from the site of the Thursday clash. The source explained that Israeli troop movements and the intensity of bombardment indicate the Israeli military’s core goal is to seize full control of the Ali al-Taher position, which offers unobstructed commanding views over most of the Nabatieh district and the Iqlim al-Tuffah region.

“Israel considers it strategically significant because of its location within the area it is attempting to control, which it has described as the ‘Yellow Line’,” the source said. “Control of this position would allow Israel to overlook the entirety of the Nabatieh district and the Iqlim area, as part of an attempt to consolidate its presence in the same territory it occupied before Lebanon’s liberation in 2000.”

The escalation came one day after the Israeli government published an official map expanding its declared military deployment zone in southern Lebanon, pushing the boundary of controlled territory all the way to the outskirts of Nabatieh, north of the Litani River. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz made clear the operation’s territorial goals during an interview with Israeli television, stating that holding seized territory is the military’s top priority. Katz added that the Israeli military is destroying villages in occupied areas of southern Lebanon and will not allow displaced residents to return to their homes.

“The 200,000 residents who lived in the security zone are not returning. None of them are returning,” Katz said.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed he had personally ordered strikes against dozens of Hezbollah targets in response to the deaths of the four Israeli soldiers, adding that Israeli forces will remain in the southern Lebanon security zone “for as long as necessary.” Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir doubled down on the aggressive rhetoric, calling for “all of Lebanon to burn.”

When asked whether Hezbollah believes the Israeli escalation was carried out with U.S. approval, the second Hezbollah source said the group now assesses that public disagreements between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right government and the U.S. administration are genuine. This marks a shift from the long-held view among Hezbollah supporters that public disputes between the two allies often mask broad alignment on core regional strategic goals.

International pressure for a de-escalation grew quickly after the violence erupted: former U.S. President Donald Trump said Washington expected a full and immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, while France called on the U.S. to intervene aggressively to prevent the fighting from spilling into a full-scale regional war.

The outbreak of renewed violence derailed planned diplomatic talks between the U.S. and Iran in Geneva, with negotiations scrapped as tensions flared. A third source familiar with Hezbollah’s position said Tehran has given the group clear assurances that it will not sign any final agreement with Washington that does not include binding provisions addressing Lebanon’s security and territorial integrity. Specifically, Iran will reject any deal that does not include “a complete and comprehensive cessation of hostilities against Lebanon across all Lebanese territory” alongside a formal commitment to a full Israeli military withdrawal from all seized Lebanese territory, the source said.

When asked whether indirect diplomatic contacts between Hezbollah and the U.S. are still ongoing, the source said he would “neither confirm nor deny” that such communications are taking place, but added that when American officials wish to reach Hezbollah, “they know exactly which channels to use.”

Hezbollah has repeatedly accused Israel of intentionally violating both the existing Lebanon ceasefire and the new U.S.-Iran regional agreement, noting that Israel has continued to target civilians, destroy civilian infrastructure and push forward with its ground incursion into southern Lebanon. The third source confirmed that Hezbollah still opposes any new round of direct bilateral negotiations between the Lebanese government and Israel hosted in Washington, and does not consider itself bound by that process. The source also added that the group has received multiple indications that the U.S. itself is no longer committed to the proposed negotiating track.

The latest round of fighting has laid bare the core, unresolved divide that has undermined all regional efforts to end the long-running conflict. Israel insists it will retain control of seized territory in southern Lebanon and bar displaced Lebanese residents from returning to their border communities. Hezbollah, by contrast, maintains that no final regional peace agreement can be accepted without an immediate end to all Israeli attacks and a full Israeli military withdrawal from all Lebanese territory.

As thousands of residents flee southern Lebanese towns for the second time in as many weeks, the standoff over the Ali al-Taher position has emerged as both a critical battle for strategic terrain and an early make-or-break test for the fragile U.S.-Iran negotiated framework that was meant to bring an end to cross-regional hostilities.

A fresh wave of Israeli airstrikes on southern Lebanon has sent shockwaves across the Middle East, killing at least 21 people and injuring more than 39 others since Thursday night, according to an official announcement from Lebanon’s Ministry of Public Health. The attack has already derailed planned follow-up negotiations between the United States and Iran aimed at cementing a region-wide ceasefire, triggering harsh condemnation from Lebanese leadership and sharp, bellicose threats from top Israeli officials.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun labeled the strikes a “dangerous and reprehensible escalation” that has claimed the lives of dozens of innocent civilians, among them women and children. In a formal statement, Aoun emphasized that the aggression undermines every ongoing effort to solidify a ceasefire and end broader regional conflict, coming just days after the US and Iran signed a landmark memorandum of understanding (MoU) designed to end more than 100 days of cross-border fighting that has devastated Lebanon.

The Israeli military, for its part, confirmed that Hezbollah fighters had killed four of its soldiers in southern Lebanon on Friday, including a senior battalion commander. Hezbollah issued its own statement confirming the attack, explaining that its fighters targeted Israeli forces that were attempting to advance into sovereign Lebanese territory. The militant group detailed that it lured an Israeli military unit into a pre-planned “kill zone” near the southern Lebanese area of Ali al-Tahir, destroying three Merkava tanks in the engagement. When a second Israeli unit moved in to recover the first, fighters hit it with concentrated rocket barrages and mortar fire.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly issued a vow of retaliation in a social media statement Friday, promising Hezbollah would pay a “heavy price” for the attack. He reiterated that Israeli forces would maintain a presence in a self-declared “security zone” in southern Lebanon for as long as necessary to protect Israeli communities in the country’s north. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz echoed Netanyahu’s hardline stance, stating that the Israeli military would not tolerate attacks on its soldiers and civilians, and any ceasefire violation by Hezbollah would be met with overwhelming force. Katz also confirmed the security zone extends from Lebanon’s Mediterranean coastline all the way to the Beaufort Heights, formalizing Israel’s expanded military footprint in the region.

The rhetoric grew even more extreme from far-right members of Netanyahu’s governing coalition. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, who has a long track record of inflammatory rhetoric against Lebanese people, called for a drastically more aggressive military response. “For every tear shed by an Israeli mother, a thousand Lebanese mothers should cry,” Ben Gvir wrote on the social platform X, adding that “all of Lebanon should burn” and emphasizing that Israel must make clear “the blood of our sons and the security of our citizens are not up for grabs.” This is not the first time Ben Gvir has made extreme remarks: just one week prior, he publicly called for the kidnapping of Lebanese women and youth to pressure Hezbollah.

Shortly after Ben Gvir’s comments, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, another far-right member of the coalition, echoed the rhetoric, calling on Israel to “open the gates of hell” for Hezbollah – a phrase he previously used to describe Israel’s military campaign in Gaza that has been widely labeled genocidal by international bodies and human rights groups.

The latest escalation comes at a critical diplomatic juncture: US and Iranian officials had been scheduled to meet in Switzerland this week to continue negotiating the terms of the MoU signed in Paris Wednesday. That agreement requires an immediate end to fighting on all regional fronts, including Lebanon, and Iranian officials have repeatedly warned that any continued Israeli military presence or operation inside Lebanese territory counts as a direct violation of the deal. Crucially, the Israeli government is not a signatory to the MoU and has openly opposed its provisions for Lebanon. Since the agreement was signed, the Israeli military has released a new official map outlining plans for expanded military occupation and operations across southern Lebanon.

In response to Israel’s new strikes, Lebanon-based broadcaster Al Mayadeen reported Thursday that the Iranian delegation had postponed its planned talks with US officials in Switzerland. The Swiss foreign ministry confirmed the postponement Friday, officially putting the diplomatic process on hold amid the new violence.

Even before this latest wave of violence, Lebanon has already suffered staggering human cost since cross-border fighting resumed on March 2. The new strikes bring the total death toll across the country to at least 3,915, a figure that stands despite a formal ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hezbollah signed back on June 2.

On a baked-earthen football pitch cut into the arid desert of southwestern Algeria’s Smara refugee camp, fine orange dust hangs thick in the still late-afternoon air, billowing in choking clouds every time a player sprints after a loose ball. Despite the unrelenting desert heat, a group of young men and teenage boys has gathered for their weekly match—one of the few steady rituals in a life defined by displacement. For the fans leaning on makeshift barriers watching the game, conversation drifts quickly from the local play to the World Cup unfolding thousands of miles across North America, and the deep, history-bound loyalty that draws nearly every Sahrawi refugee in Algeria’s camps to cheer for one team: Algeria.

According to United Nations data, more than 173,000 Sahrawi refugees currently reside in a network of camps near Tindouf, Algeria. Their displacement stretches back 50 years, rooted in a decades-long dispute over their indigenous homeland of Western Sahara, a 266,000-square-kilometer desert expanse in Northwest Africa bordered by the Atlantic Ocean, Morocco, Mauritania and Algeria.

The conflict’s origins trace to the late 19th century, when Spain colonized the region, then called Spanish Sahara. After Morocco gained independence from colonial rule in 1956, it staked a long-standing territorial claim to Western Sahara. By 1973, the Polisario Front formed to advocate for Sahrawi independence, launching an armed movement after Spain agreed to cede the territory to Morocco and Mauritania in the 1975 Madrid Accords—an agreement negotiated without any input from Sahrawi representatives, following Morocco’s mass Green March of 350,000 civilian supporters into the territory. The resulting war forced thousands of Sahrawis to flee across the border into Algeria, where they established the refugee camps that remain home to generations of displaced people today.

A 1991 UN-brokered ceasefire established the MINURSO peacekeeping mission to oversee a planned independence referendum for Western Sahara, but the vote has never been held due to disputes over voter eligibility. The ceasefire collapsed entirely in 2020, after Morocco launched military operations in a UN buffer zone, and sporadic fighting has resumed in the years since. Today, Morocco controls most of Western Sahara, incentivizing Moroccan settlers to move to the region, while the Polisario Front holds a smaller eastern stretch of desert and continues to campaign for full Sahrawi independence—with Algeria as its most prominent regional backer.

That decades-long political and humanitarian partnership has woven deep ties between Sahrawi refugees and their host nation. For generations, Sahrawi refugees have attended Algerian schools and universities, received medical care in Algerian hospitals, and built interwoven family, cultural and political bonds across the border. To many, Algeria is far more than a place of refuge—it is a steadfast ally in their struggle for self-determination.

“My support for Algeria is unconditional,” Brahim Salem, a long-term camp resident, told Middle East Eye. “For us, Algeria is not just a neighbour. It’s a country that stood against oppression and gave us safety when we needed it most.”

That loyalty translates directly to the football pitch. Because the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic remains unrecognized by FIFA, Sahrawi players cannot compete as an independent national team in major international tournaments. For displaced Sahrawis, supporting Algeria becomes a way to channel collective pride and national aspiration that cannot be expressed through their own team.

Algalya, a 60-something refugee who fled Western Sahara as a war refugee decades ago, is among the millions of Sahrawi fans ready to cheer on Algeria. She still vividly remembers the joy of Algeria’s 2019 Africa Cup of Nations victory, when the entire camp erupted in celebration with traditional zaghareet ululations that lasted long into the night. “I remember having nowhere to go, and Algeria welcomed us with open arms,” she said. “I pray Algeria make us happy again.”

Across the camps, football is woven into the fabric of daily life: children chase balls across dusty dirt streets between tents, families huddle around bulky secondhand televisions to watch major tournaments, and local weekly matches like the one in Smara draw crowds of enthusiastic spectators. For local players Hafdala Mohamed and Khalil, their World Cup plan is already set: they will gather to watch every single one of Algeria’s matches together, no matter how late kickoff falls.

For Hafdala, like many other Sahrawi refugees, football is far more than just entertainment. It is one of the only unchanging certainties in a life shaped by decades of exile. Even as the conflict over their homeland remains unresolved, and the dream of self-determination stays unfulfilled, the shared joy of supporting Algeria on the world’s biggest football stage offers a rare moment of collective connection and hope.

On Indonesia’s world-famous tourist island of Bali, law enforcement officials have successfully disrupted a large-scale illegal wildlife trafficking operation, seizing 21 live, protected green sea turtles and arresting one suspected ring member last week, Bali police announced publicly this Friday.

The operation was launched after local residents tipped off authorities about suspicious activity linked to wildlife trade along the island’s remote Pegametan coast. Acting on the tip, law enforcement teams carried out a targeted raid on the area on June 10, recovering all 21 live turtles before they could enter the illegal market, explained Nanang Pri Hasmojo, chief of law enforcement for Bali’s police force.

Officers took 67-year-old suspect—identified publicly only by his initials KS—into custody at the scene. Investigators say the man is accused of functioning as a storage point for the trafficked reptiles, holding them until they could be moved to other sellers for distribution to end buyers. During initial interrogation, the suspect allegedly told officials that the shipment of turtles was sent by a criminal associate who collected the animals from waters off Madura, an island off the coast of East Java province. Under the suspected trafficking chain, KS received the contraband directly on Pegametan Beach, where another co-conspirator was scheduled to pick the turtles up for resale.

Hasmojo confirmed that the investigation is still actively ongoing. “We are continuing to map out the full network and pursue all other co-conspirators connected to this smuggling ring,” he stated. The arrested suspect has already been formally charged under Indonesia’s strict national wildlife protection legislation. If convicted on all counts, he faces a maximum sentence of 15 years in prison plus substantial financial penalties.

All sea turtle species found in Indonesian waters have held formal protected status under the country’s conservation and fisheries laws since 1990. A 2018 regulation issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry further strengthened these protections, explicitly outlining prohibitions on harming or trading in six native sea turtle species, and additional government rules have fully banned all commercial trade of the animals nationwide.

The global crisis facing sea turtles has been well-documented by conservation researchers. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), targeted poaching of both turtles and their eggs—carried out by both local community actors and large transnational criminal networks—is one of the leading driving forces pushing six of the world’s seven recognized sea turtle species into threatened or endangered conservation status.

A 2022 study conducted by researchers at Arizona State University, published in the peer-reviewed journal *Global Change Biology*, estimated that more than 1.1 million sea turtles were illegally killed across the globe between 1990 and 2020. Most of this killing is driven by demand for turtle meat, unproven claims that turtle products act as aphrodisiacs, and use of turtle parts in traditional cultural and spiritual practices. The study found that green sea turtles (scientific name *Chelonia mydas*), the same species rescued in the Bali raid, made up 56% of all sea turtles killed illegally during that 30-year period.

Historically, Bali emerged as a major trafficking hub for green sea turtles, a trend shaped in part by long-standing local cultural practices: for generations, Balinese Hinduism—the dominant religion on the 4.5 million-person island—has used turtle meat in religious offerings. In recent years, however, conservation outreach and stricter enforcement have significantly reduced illegal turtle trade on the island, though smuggling rings continue to operate to meet remaining demand.