分类: world

  • Ukrainian drone strike kills 1 in southern Russia and triggers fire at sea terminal

    Ukrainian drone strike kills 1 in southern Russia and triggers fire at sea terminal

    As the long-stagnant front line of the Russia-Ukraine war continues to lock both sides into costly positional conflict, Kyiv has intensified its cross-border long-range strike campaign targeting Russian military and energy infrastructure deep behind enemy lines. The latest incident unfolded Saturday in Russia’s southern Krasnodar region, where local officials confirmed a Ukrainian drone strike left one civilian dead and three others injured.

    Krasnodar Governor Veniamin Kondratyev reported that falling drone debris ignited a blaze at a coastal terminal facility. While the governor did not release specific details about the site’s function, Russian independent news outlets confirmed the damaged terminal is located in the village of Volna, a key Black Sea hub that handles exports of crude oil, petroleum products and liquefied natural gas.

    Ukraine’s General Staff has not issued an official confirmation or comment on the Krasnodar strike, but the military body did acknowledge overnight long-range operations targeting multiple sites. It confirmed successful strikes on an oil processing and pumping station in Russia’s Volgograd region, in addition to military targets in Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine’s eastern Donetsk and southern Zaporizhzhia regions.

    The weekend strike marks the latest progression of Kyiv’s expanding deep-strike strategy, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy publicly acknowledged earlier this week. Zelenskyy announced Wednesday that Ukrainian forces had used domestically produced FP-5 Flamingo long-range missiles to hit a key military manufacturing facility in Cheboksary, located in Russia’s Chuvashiya region more than 900 kilometers from the active front line. The facility, Zelenskyy noted, produces critical components for Russian attack drones and cruise missiles used in regular strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure.

    More than four years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the roughly 1,000-kilometer front line has remained largely static. Dense drone usage from both sides has effectively repelled large-scale ground advances, leading both militaries to shift increasingly to long-range strike operations to disrupt the opponent’s logistics, supply chains and critical infrastructure.

    The latest wave of Ukrainian strikes comes just one week after high-profile attacks that damaged an oil terminal in St. Petersburg and struck a nearby Russian naval base. Those attacks occurred during a major Kremlin-hosted economic forum in Putin’s hometown, creating an embarrassing public setback for the Russian leader. In response, Putin publicly pledged to bolster Russia’s nationwide air defense network to intercept more incoming long-range weapons and drones.

    The escalation of cross-border attacks was not limited to Ukraine on Saturday: Ukrainian regional authorities reported that Russian strikes targeting the southern Dnipropetrovsk region left nine people injured. Regional governor Oleksandr Hanzha wrote in a Telegram post that Russian forces launched more than 20 separate attacks across three districts of the region, using both attack drones and aerial bombs. The strikes ignited a large fire at a local public marketplace, and six of the injured people were hospitalized for treatment, including one man in critical condition, Hanzha added.

    The Associated Press continues to provide ongoing full coverage of the Russia-Ukraine war, with additional reporting available at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine.

  • AP Was There: 1975 summit at French castle plants seed for future G7 club of wealthy nations

    AP Was There: 1975 summit at French castle plants seed for future G7 club of wealthy nations

    Fifty years after the first gathering of top Western industrial leaders that laid the foundation for one of the world’s most influential global policy blocs, the upcoming G7 summit in France has drawn fresh attention to the historic 1975 meeting that started it all. On November 15, 1975, U.S. President Gerald Ford joined the heads of government from France, West Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Japan for three days of closed-door economic brainstorming at the Château de Rambouillet, a sprawling 14th-century royal retreat 30 miles outside Paris. That initial gathering of six nations would expand one year later with the addition of Canada, giving rise to the Group of Seven, a bloc that would shape global economic, diplomatic and security policy through the Cold War and beyond. To mark the upcoming 2024 summit, the Associated Press is republishing key excerpts of its original on-the-ground reporting from the 1975 inaugural summit, filed by veteran correspondent Arthur L. Gavshon.

    Opening the first session of the summit against the backdrop of Rambouillet’s gilded royal history—where Louis XV once relaxed and Napoleon Bonaparte spent his final night in France before exile to Saint Helena—President Ford laid out an ambitious goal for the assembled leaders: pull the global economy out of a crippling mid-1970s slump and return to full prosperity by 1977. A senior presidential aide told reporters that Ford categorically rejected the growing narrative that major industrial economies could never return to the pre-recession growth rates that had defined the post-war decades. He added that the U.S. economic recovery was already outpacing early forecasts, projecting that American growth would hit between 6% and 7% through 1976.

    After nearly three hours of open, informal talks, the leaders adjourned for dinner, and host French President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing offered an early optimistic assessment to waiting reporters. “I am optimistic. I think we can arrive at something concrete,” he said. A French presidential spokesperson echoed that positivity, noting that the leaders had already achieved a “remarkable convergence of views” on core challenges. Senior British officials signaled a growing consensus among attendees that the worst of the global downturn had already passed, while U.S. Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger echoed the upbeat tone, telling reporters the first day of talks “went very well.”

    True to the French government’s deliberate low-key framing of the event as a working seminar rather than a lavish state occasion, the opening night dinner was intentionally simple, a stark departure from the opulent banquets that usually mark high-level French state events. Stuffed chicken served with solid but unexceptional French wine was the featured main course, a deliberate choice aligned with the gathering’s focus on practical problem-solving over pomp. Even the attire of the participating leaders reflected this casual working tone: Giscard d’Estaing wore a soft greenish tweed weekend suit, West German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt opted for a casual light gray suit, and only Ford dressed in more formal attire—a dark blue three-piece suit paired with a white shirt.

    The event’s organizers pulled out all stops to prepare the historic chateau for the high-profile gathering, hauling priceless art, furniture and statuary from the Louvre Museum in Paris to restore the chateau’s stately rooms, with moving crews working into the early hours of Saturday morning to finish setup. More than 3,000 armed French police officers were deployed across the chateau’s hundreds of acres of wooded grounds and manicured gardens to secure the meeting. Each leader was assigned a custom-furnished private apartment in the chateau: Ford took the top suite in the Francois I tower, the chateau’s most comfortable quarters, outfitted with a Spanish-made bed, a working fireplace and a direct hotline to the White House. Harold Wilson of the UK received a mahogany-and-satin suite overlooking the garden ponds, Takeo Miki of Japan took a wood-beamed apartment with period Louis XVI furniture, Helmut Schmidt stayed in a Directoire-style suite, and Aldo Moro of Italy was assigned rooms decorated in Empire-era furnishings.

    A number of key priorities emerged from the first day of discussions. Japanese Prime Minister Takeo Miki, who opened his remarks by noting that Japan’s export-reliant economy had been hit particularly hard by collapsing global trade, immediately pushed the group to prioritize commitments to expand and liberalize cross-border international commerce. British Prime Minister Harold Wilson, working through senior aides, called on fellow leaders to back a new, strengthened global non-proliferation framework to slow the spread of sensitive nuclear technology, equipment and weapons. On the second day of the summit, Ford was set to join Giscard d’Estaing and Moro for a religious service at the local Roman Catholic church in the nearby village of Poigny la Forêt, a short 10-minute drive from the chateau.

    Unlike large multilateral summits that target binding final agreements, the 1975 Rambouillet gathering was framed from the start as a collaborative working retreat, where leaders would not reach firm final decisions but instead align on shared policy directions to tackle the era’s most pressing economic challenges: double-digit inflation, rising unemployment, and shrinking global trade. White House Press Secretary Ron Nessen told reporters aboard Ford’s transatlantic flight to the summit that the meeting could ultimately deliver tangible benefits to American consumers, noting that the president had always framed the gathering through the lens of practical impacts for everyday households.

    Four core policy domains anchored the talks, each highlighting deep shared interests and occasional disagreements between the six nations. The first was long-running Franco-American tensions over reform of the global monetary system: French officials opposed the existing regime of floating exchange rates and pushed for a return to a more rigid fixed-rate system, while the U.S. and UK favored retaining the flexibility of floating rates. Second, leaders aligned around the need for a coordinated common energy policy, with Ford earning broad backing for his argument that industrial democracies could not allow their economic and political futures to be held hostage by oil-producing nations, calling for rapid joint development of new energy supply sources and collective conservation programs. Third, the group discussed the broader global economic outlook and coordinated strategies to curb inflation, which was already eroding political stability in dozens of countries. Finally, leaders debated how to structure more cooperative relationships between three tiers of the global economy: advanced Western industrial nations, newly wealthy oil and raw material exporting states, and the world’s lowest-income developing countries.

    Over the decades since that 1975 retreat, the G7 has grown into one of the world’s most consequential global forums, with rotating annual hostings that consistently draw global headlines thanks to the bloc’s combined economic, industrial, military and diplomatic weight.

  • AP exclusive: Doctors Without Borders report found cases of abuse and exploitation by staff in Chad

    AP exclusive: Doctors Without Borders report found cases of abuse and exploitation by staff in Chad

    A confidential internal investigation from global humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders (MSF) has uncovered a widespread pattern of sexual abuse and exploitation targeting vulnerable displaced populations on the Chad-Sudan border, exposing deep systemic failures in the group’s safeguards against misconduct in crisis settings. The 59 verified and alleged abuses, first brought to public attention by Associated Press investigative reporting, include exploitation of underage girls, transactional sex for food and work, and even indicators of potential organized trafficking among both local and international MSF staff.

  • UAE paid Iran billions of dollars to halt strikes: Report

    UAE paid Iran billions of dollars to halt strikes: Report

    In a dramatic reversal of its long-held hardline stance toward Iran, the United Arab Emirates has reached a landmark agreement that includes billions of dollars in payments to Tehran in exchange for a permanent halt to Iranian attacks on Emirati territory, multiple international news outlets have reported. The development marks one of the most significant geopolitical realignments in the Persian Gulf in recent years, reshaping long-standing regional power dynamics in the wake of the US-led conflict against Iran.

    Details of the agreement remain fragmented across multiple anonymous sources, but the core framework has been confirmed by reporting from Reuters, Bloomberg, and Middle East Eye. According to two regional insiders cited by Reuters, the UAE has already transferred $3 billion to Iran as an initial installment, with the total value of the deal projected to reach as high as $10 billion. Two other anonymous sources, however, put the eventual total payout at $20 billion. It remains unclear whether the funds were drawn from frozen Iranian assets held in Emirati financial institutions or from the UAE’s own sovereign wealth funds, a question Reuters did not pursue in its initial reporting.

    The shift comes after years of the UAE positioning itself as one of Iran’s most vocal critics in the Gulf. Abu Dhabi once led regional lobbying efforts in Washington to push for continued aggressive US policy toward the Islamic Republic, and joined the US and Israel in launching dozens of strikes against Iranian targets during the recent regional war. It even took punitive measures against Pakistan when Islamabad hosted mediation talks aimed at ending the conflict, calling in outstanding debt obligations that forced Saudi Arabia to step in with a new emergency loan to stabilize Pakistan’s economy.

    In recent weeks, however, the rapid reversal of this policy has been impossible to ignore. Just days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a high-profile wartime visit to Abu Dhabi that resulted in a new joint defense acquisition deal between the two countries, the UAE’s powerful national security adviser and Abu Dhabi Deputy Ruler Sheikh Tahnoun bin Zayed al-Nahyan hosted senior officials from Iran’s US-sanctioned Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps at his private guest house. This meeting was followed by a new round of face-to-face diplomatic talks between Emirati envoys and senior Iranian leaders this week, held to further de-escalate cross-border tensions, Bloomberg confirmed. A Gulf diplomat told Middle East Eye that the discussions were aimed explicitly at securing guarantees that the UAE would not be targeted in Iranian retaliatory attacks.

    The new arrangement has already played out in regional security dynamics: as Iran has launched retaliatory strikes against smaller Gulf states including Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan in recent weeks amid a fragile US-Iran ceasefire, the UAE has faced no attacks, and has refrained from joining new strikes against Iran. Analysts say the deal signals that Iran has emerged from the recent conflict in a strengthened regional position, despite coordinated pressure from the US, Israel, and Gulf allies.

    For decades, the UAE has served as a key financial and trade hub for Iran, with deep economic ties that have often outlasted periods of geopolitical tension. Iranians hold major stakes in the UAE’s lucrative real estate sector, and even after the outbreak of the US-Israeli war on Iran, when Abu Dhabi publicly considered freezing billions of dollars in Iranian-linked assets, it never followed through with a public implementation of that threat. Esfandyar Batmanghelidj, chief executive of the Bourse & Bazaar Foundation, noted on social media platform X that the agreement is likely the first step toward revitalizing these cross-border economic bonds. “Everyone needs to remember that the UAE is Iran’s most important trading partner. By ‘releasing’ funds to Iran, the UAE ensures those funds will be spent in the Emirates,” Batmanghelidj wrote. “Both countries will double down on economic interdependence and the multiplier effects of bilateral trade.”

    The deal also carries implications for US diplomacy in the region. One source told Reuters that the arrangement allows Iran to secure the financial concessions it demanded for a ceasefire, while enabling the Trump administration to publicly claim it did not directly pay Iran for the agreement. A former US intelligence official told Middle East Eye that it is nearly impossible that Washington was unaware of the IRGC meeting hosted by Sheikh Tahnoun, given the extensive US intelligence footprint in the Gulf. The shift in UAE-Iran ties comes as the US and Iran are on the verge of finalizing a 60-day memorandum of understanding to negotiate over security in the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s nuclear program.

    The Reuters report follows a similar recent development reported by the Washington Post, which claimed Qatar agreed to shut down its Ras Laffan refinery in exchange for Iran halting attacks on Qatari territory. Qatar has since denied any such coordination with Tehran.

  • Watch: Peru police dress up as World Cup mascots during drug raid

    Watch: Peru police dress up as World Cup mascots during drug raid

    In a clever and unconventional sting operation that has caught global attention, law enforcement agents in Peru pulled off a high-stakes drug raid with a surprising twist: officers disguised themselves as official mascots for the upcoming 2026 FIFA World Cup to gain entry to the residence of a suspected drug trafficker. What made the operation even more notable is that the target of the raid is an avowed football fan, a detail that law enforcement leveraged to lower his guard and pull off the surprise entry. The brazen, creative approach to police work has been shared widely across social media, with footage of the disguised officers showing them leaning into the full mascot costumes to avoid tipping off the suspect before they could execute the search warrant. While unusual tactics, the disguise proved to be a successful strategic choice, allowing officers to enter the property without immediate suspicion before moving in to apprehend the suspect and seize any contraband on site.

  • US kills leader of Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua gang in airstrike, Trump says

    US kills leader of Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua gang in airstrike, Trump says

    In a Wednesday announcement made via his Truth Social platform, former and current U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed that U.S. military forces have eliminated Héctor Rusthenford Guerrero Flores — widely known as Niño Guerrero, the long-serving leader of Latin America’s most feared transnational criminal syndicate Tren de Aragua — in a targeted airstrike.

    “At my direction, the United States Southern Command delivered a swift and lethal kinetic strike to successfully execute Niño Guerrero,” Trump wrote in his social media post. Accompanying the announcement was video footage appearing to capture the strike itself, which shows a green two-story building and an adjacent outbuilding erupting in a massive explosion, with debris hurled into the air in the immediate aftermath of the blast. Trump added that the operation was “coordinated closely with our friends in Venezuela, with whom we are working very well” following January’s raid that removed former Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro from power.

    For years, Niño Guerrero has topped U.S. law enforcement’s most wanted lists, with the State Department offering a multi-million dollar reward for any information leading to his capture. Under his decades-long leadership, what began as a small prison gang inside Venezuela’s Tocorón Prison evolved into a sprawling transnational criminal organization that the Trump administration formally designated as a foreign terrorist group earlier this term, placing it in the same classification as the Islamic State. Trump has repeatedly accused the syndicate of waging what he calls “irregular warfare” against the United States.

    A career criminal who cycled in and out of Venezuelan custody for decades, Niño Guerrero first catapulted to notoriety in 2012, when he bribed a prison guard to escape custody, only to be recaptured a year later. Upon his return to Tocorón Prison, located in Venezuela’s northern Aragua state, he transformed the overcrowded, under-governed facility into a self-contained criminal compound equipped with a private zoo, full-service restaurants, a public nightclub, a betting parlor and a swimming pool. It was not until September 2023, when then-president Maduro deployed 11,000 soldiers to retake control of the prison, that Niño Guerrero escaped once again, going off-grid while continuing to direct his sprawling criminal network.

    Under Niño Guerrero’s leadership, Tren de Aragua expanded far beyond Venezuela’s borders, establishing operational nodes in eight countries across the Americas including Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Chile, and the United States. The syndicate diversified its criminal revenue streams away from its origins extorting vulnerable migrants moving through Venezuela, expanding into sex trafficking, contract killing, kidnapping, illicit gold mining, and international drug trafficking. The group seized control of unregulated gold mines in Venezuela’s southern Bolívar state, key drug trafficking corridors along the country’s Caribbean coast, and unpatrolled clandestine border crossings between Venezuela and Colombia, often partnering with established local criminal groups to expand its reach. In Ecuador, the gang has been linked to factions aligned with Mexico’s Sinaloa Cartel, while in Colombia, reports have tied it to fighters from the left-wing National Liberation Army (ELN) guerrilla group.

    This targeted killing of Niño Guerrero is the latest escalation in a series of aggressive U.S. counter-criminal operations launched by the Trump administration against Tren de Aragua and other drug trafficking groups. Since September, U.S. forces have launched dozens of airstrikes against maritime vessels the administration claims are smuggling drug shipments bound for the United States, many of which are linked to the Venezuelan syndicate. U.S. media reports estimate that more than 200 people have been killed in these maritime strikes to date.

    The campaign has sparked significant controversy and legal scrutiny, however. The U.S. military has yet to release public evidence confirming that the targeted boats were actually carrying drugs or affiliated with drug smuggling operations, leading critics to question the legality and ethics of the ongoing campaign. Multiple international law experts have argued that the strikes violate fundamental norms of international law, as they target individuals — including potentially civilian bystanders — without affording them basic due process protections. The Trump administration has pushed back against these criticisms, asserting that all operations are legally justified. In a formal statement to Congress last year, the White House confirmed that President Trump had formally determined the U.S. is in a state of armed conflict with transnational drug cartels, meaning that crew members of suspected smuggling vessels are classified as enemy combatants, legalizing targeted lethal force against them.

  • US officials say Hormuz oil flows reaching half of pre-war levels

    US officials say Hormuz oil flows reaching half of pre-war levels

    In a series of public remarks delivered Friday, senior United States government officials have confirmed that the US Navy is carrying out nightly escort missions for dozens of commercial tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz, moving millions of barrels of crude oil through the critical chokepoint amid an ongoing regional conflict that has disrupted global energy supplies.

    US Energy Secretary Chris Wright told the Bloomberg Energy Security Executive Briefing held in Houston, Texas on Friday that tankers under American protection currently carry approximately seven million barrels of oil through the Strait of Hormuz each day. That volume accounts for roughly half of the total daily traffic that passed through the waterway before the US-Israeli military campaign against Iran began on February 28. Wright noted that current shipping volumes are continuing to climb, closing the gap left by the post-conflict blockade.

    “Flows today are approaching half of the gap, and they’re rising,” Wright told attendees at the briefing.

    Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum echoed Wright’s confirmation in an interview with CNBC Friday, adding that the operation escorts up to 20 vessels through the strait each night, with some nights seeing more than 20 commercial ships pass through under US protection. Burgum emphasized that the operations have already moved large volumes of crude out of the Gulf, and that global energy markets have already priced in this recovery ahead of mainstream media coverage.

    “Some nights, more than 20 ships [are] coming out,” Burgum said. “Substantial amounts of oil have come out of the strait. I think the markets figured that out before some of the tabloid press did, because you’re starting to see a softening of oil prices.”

    The confirmation comes after US President Donald Trump earlier this week claimed that the US had been carrying out secret escort operations for commercial vessels leaving the Gulf. Trump claimed that the operations have already allowed more than 200 commercial ships and 100 million barrels of oil to bypass Iran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.

    As ceasefire negotiations between Washington and Tehran continue, it remains unclear whether Iran has implicitly approved the ongoing escort operations. Earlier this week, an American Apache attack helicopter operating in the waterway was shot down, according to US media, which linked the aircraft to the escort mission. Iranian officials have downplayed the severity of the incident, offering few details on the encounter.

    Global oil markets saw extreme volatility after the US and Israel launched their military campaign against Iran, with international benchmark Brent crude spiking to $112 per barrel in the immediate weeks after the conflict began. Energy analysts have long noted that public exchange prices have not fully reflected the actual premiums paid for physical crude cargoes, particularly in Asia, a region that relies heavily on crude exports from Gulf producing states.

    Many market analysts predicted even steeper price spikes after Iran seized control of the Strait of Hormuz and imposed a blockade on energy shipments from neighboring Gulf states. In response, the US implemented its own counter-blockade that removed Iranian crude barrels already under international sanctions from global markets.

    Global oil markets stabilized after a series of policy interventions: Western nations released 400 million barrels of crude from their strategic emergency reserves, while China made an unprecedented cut to its crude import volumes to reduce demand. China’s May crude imports fell roughly three million barrels per day compared to year-ago levels, according to trade data.

    Neither Burgum nor Wright offered a clear timeline for how long the nightly escort operations will continue. But the operations have already coincided with a steady downward trend in global oil prices this month. Brent crude, the global benchmark, has fallen roughly 20 percent over the past 30 days. On Friday, the benchmark traded 3.5 percent lower at $87.17 per barrel, as both Iran and the US publicly signaled that a new ceasefire agreement is within reach.

  • Myanmar’s president to visit China

    Myanmar’s president to visit China

    Diplomatic relations between China and Myanmar are set for a key milestone this week, as Myanmar President Min Aung Hlaing prepares to embark on a five-day state visit to China starting Monday, according to a recent announcement from China’s Foreign Ministry. This trip marks Min Aung Hlaing’s first official visit to China since he was sworn in as Myanmar’s president in April this year, and is widely expected to strengthen long-standing fraternal ties and expand practical collaboration between the two neighboring nations.

    Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian confirmed on Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping will hold official talks with Min Aung Hlaing during the visit. Separately, Chinese Premier Li Qiang and Zhao Leji, Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, China’s top legislative body, will also meet with the Myanmar leader.

    In remarks at a regular press briefing, Lin emphasized that China and Myanmar share a deep history as traditional friendly neighbors and have committed to building a bilateral community with a shared future. Over the 75 years since the two countries established formal diplomatic relations, both sides have consistently upheld the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence—a framework they co-initiated. Through decades of standing together through challenges, supporting one another, and advancing collective cooperation, bilateral relations have delivered substantial, mutually beneficial progress.

    “Through this visit, China looks forward to working alongside Myanmar to carry forward the traditional ‘pauk-phaw’ fraternal friendship, deepen the bilateral comprehensive strategic partnership, achieve more tangible outcomes in advancing the China-Myanmar community with a shared future, and bring greater welfare to the people of both countries,” Lin added.

    The upcoming state visit builds on a string of recent high-level diplomatic exchanges between the two countries. Earlier this month, Myanmar Foreign Minister Tin Maung Swe traveled to Beijing for talks, and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi paid an official visit to Myanmar back in April.

    Economic ties between the two nations have already shown strong growth in recent years: China has held the position of Myanmar’s largest trading partner for multiple consecutive years, and official Chinese data shows bilateral trade volume hit $19.4 billion in 2025, representing a 19.1% year-on-year increase.

    Just this week, during an appearance at the opening ceremony of 2026 Chinese Film Week in Myanmar’s capital Nay Pyi Taw, Min Aung Hlaing expressed public gratitude to China for its support, per Myanmar’s presidential office. He specifically thanked China for dispatching emergency humanitarian assistance after a recent major earthquake struck Myanmar, as well as for its continued long-term support for Myanmar’s social development across key sectors including education, public health, social welfare, and rural development.

    Zhou Fangyin, a professor specializing in international relations at Sun Yat-sen University based in Guangzhou, Guangdong, noted that the development of China-Myanmar relations has long been rooted in the core principles of mutual respect and mutual benefit. The strong political trust established by both sides over decades has laid a solid, enabling foundation for expanding practical cooperation in all areas moving forward.

  • The college scam that promised students fleeing war a new life in Finland

    The college scam that promised students fleeing war a new life in Finland

    For thousands of young Burmese displaced by the 2021 military coup, a vocational education spot in Finland represented far more than just a degree — it was a lifeline out of conflict, poverty, and uncertainty. But for hundreds of these aspiring students, that dream has collapsed into financial ruin and exploitation, at the center of what Finnish law enforcement calls one of the largest education fraud schemes they have ever investigated.

    The story begins with the upheaval that shattered education across Myanmar after the military seized power in February 2021. Thousands of educators abandoned their posts, and pro-democracy students refused to enroll in institutions controlled by the junta. Many young people, including 19-year-old Ma Naw Phaw, fled to refugee settlements along the Thai-Myanmar border, where they scrambled to access alternative schooling in towns like Mae Sot. It was there that Ma Naw Phaw first encountered Brighter Future Way (BFW), an education recruitment agency that promised Burmese students access to vocational programs across Finland, complete with guaranteed residence permits and a clear path to stable employment that would let them support their families.

    For Ma Naw Phaw, the opportunity felt too good to miss. “It didn’t matter what I studied,” she recalled. “I just knew I needed a degree to find a good job and earn a decent wage to lift my family out of hardship.” Like dozens of other students, she began preparing for the move, taking Finnish language courses organized by BFW and working to raise the exorbitant fees the agency charged. The 10,000 euros ($11,500) BFW demanded for language training, visa processing, and vocational school placement was a catastrophic sum for her family: it took nearly a year of sacrifice to raise, and her mother ultimately sold two plots of family farmland to cover the cost. But the investment felt worth it for a future in what agencies marketed as the “world’s happiest country,” where once students secured a study residence permit, their entire families could eventually join them.

    This marketing pitch grew increasingly powerful after Western nations including the United States and United Kingdom tightened visa rules for Burmese nationals following the 2021 coup, over concerns that student visas were being used to claim refugee status. Finland, by contrast, was positioned as a welcoming, accessible alternative, with agencies touting easy visa approval, free high-quality education, and the ability to work while studying to cover living costs. BFW, which advertised itself as a specialist service supporting Burmese students seeking to study, work, and live abroad, even had registered offices in Myanmar, Thailand, and Finland, giving it an air of legitimacy that convinced hundreds of vulnerable young people to sign up.

    But the promise quickly unraveled for most students. By April of this year, Ma Naw Phaw’s application for a Finnish residence permit was rejected — a outcome BFW had repeatedly insisted would never happen. When she reached out to BFW to demand a refund, the agency went silent. Within weeks, she learned that BFW founder Min Min Soe Shwe had been arrested by Finnish authorities, and her entire life savings were gone.

    Interviews with six affected students, a Finnish vocational institution, and BFW’s Thailand-based co-founder Phitak Pakay confirm that BFW is the agency at the center of the large-scale investigation launched by Finland’s Border Guard. The probe covers activity between 2022 and 2025, during which BFW offered placement services to roughly 350 Burmese students. Investigators suspect the scheme operated under false pretenses: the agency charged exorbitant, hidden fees for services it never delivered, leaving hundreds of students and their families deep in debt.

    Juho Sillanpää, the lead investigator on the case, told the BBC that the scam has left hundreds of students in extremely vulnerable positions, putting them at high risk of further financial or personal exploitation. While Sillanpää noted that Finnish law enforcement has investigated multiple education agent fraud cases over the years, most have been far smaller in scale. He added that the alleged conduct could amount to aggravated extortion, though he declined to name the organization or individuals under investigation publicly.

    Students who fell victim to the scheme describe a pattern of deception from the start. Ma Naw Phaw told reporters that after paying thousands of euros for Finnish language training, she arrived at BFW’s Mae Sat facility to find no qualified teachers at all — students were forced to teach one another. When she asked to withdraw after a few months, BFW representatives told her no refunds would be issued under any circumstances.

    For 21-year-old Ko Myint, the outcome has been even bleaker. His parents emptied their entire life savings and borrowed thousands of dollars from relatives to pay BFW’s 8,000 euro fee, while working as low-wage migrants at a Thai food factory earning just $305 a month. After Ko Myint already paid the lump sum, BFW suddenly demanded an extra 3,500 baht per month in accommodation fees that were never disclosed upfront. When he could not pay, he was dropped from the program despite already receiving an offer to study nursing in Helsinki. “They told me not a single baht of my money was left, but I never even got a visa,” he said. “I don’t understand how all the money could be gone.” Today, Ko Myint works back-to-back day and night shifts at the factory to pay off his family’s debt, and he faced harassment and intimidation after speaking out about his experience on social media.

    Only a tiny number of students recruited by BFW actually made it to Finland to complete their programs. One of the few, 26-year-old Ko Myo, told reporters he was allowed to defer his fees until after he graduated and found work as a nursing home employee — a flexible arrangement none of the other interviewed students received.

    Finnish vocational college EduSavo Oy had planned to accept its first cohort of BFW-recruited students in autumn 2025, but the partnership collapsed in May when BFW failed to deliver required tuition payments, just as news of the investigation broke. “We received information regarding the ongoing police investigation and information indicating that BFW was currently unable to complete the payment,” EduSavo CEO Mira Repo told the BBC. “My understanding is that Min Min Soe Shwe was detained by Finnish authorities.”

    BFW co-founder Phitak Pakay, based in Thailand, told reporters that the organization has lost all contact with Min Min Soe Shwe and will wind down operations imminently, as no students remain in BFW-provided accommodation. The BBC has reached out to Min Min Soe Shwe’s legal representation and family, both of whom declined to comment for this report.

    For surviving victims like Ma Naw Phaw, the aftermath of the scam has left deep personal and financial scars. She has relocated to another city in Thailand, too ashamed to return to her family’s home in Myanmar, and the loss of the farmland strained her relationship with her mother — who only came to understand they had been scammed after news of Min Min Soe Shwe’s arrest broke.

    Finland’s Ministry of Education says it is not directly involved in the criminal investigation, but has expressed deep concern over the alleged violations. While third-party education agents like BFW have become common for international student recruitment worldwide, including in Finland, the ministry noted that new regulations set to take effect in August will eliminate the need for intermediaries: starting this year, all international students will be able to apply directly to Finnish vocational schools, cutting out predatory middlemen that exploit vulnerable applicants. Despite the forthcoming regulatory change, the hundreds of Burmese students caught in BFW’s scheme face a long, uncertain road to recover their lost savings and rebuild their shattered futures.

  • US deportation flight carrying Iranians lands in C.African Republic

    US deportation flight carrying Iranians lands in C.African Republic

    A U.S. deportation flight carrying dozens of migrants from Iran, Afghanistan, Turkey and Georgia has landed in the Central African Republic (CAR), lawyers and human rights advocates confirmed Friday, marking the latest controversial third-country deportation carried out by the Trump administration as part of its aggressive immigration crackdown.

    The policy of deporting migrants—even those granted limited legal protection in the U.S.—to third countries with which they have no personal or familial ties has become a core pillar of President Donald Trump’s expanded immigration enforcement push. Notably, this flight included Iranian nationals who had previously fled their home country, despite Washington being officially at war with the Tehran government that Trump has labeled a “terrorist regime.” Legal representatives confirmed at least two Iranian women were among those on board, a group that included people granted “withholding of removal” status. This designation, which offers weaker protections than full asylum, was still recognized as a legitimate form of legal protection for migrants facing danger if returned to their home countries under previous U.S. administrations.

    The flight departed from Alexandria, Louisiana, Thursday evening, according to tracking data from ICE Flight Monitor, a project run by the non-profit human rights organization Human Rights First. After a scheduled stopover in Ghana—already a well-established regional hub for U.S. third-country deportations—the plane touched down in Bangui, the CAR’s capital, around 21:00 GMT. Immigration lawyer Alma David, who is familiar with the details of the operation, said it remains unclear whether any migrants disembarked in Ghana or all passengers were brought on to the CAR. Ghanaian immigration officials did not respond to repeated requests for comment from AFP.

    The deportation destination itself raises immediate alarm, as the U.S. State Department currently maintains a level 4 travel advisory for the CAR, urging Americans “do not travel to Central African Republic for any reason.” Though years of intervention by a United Nations peacekeeping mission, Rwandan defense forces and Russian mercenaries from the Wagner Group have slightly reduced large-scale violence, armed rebel groups and anti-government factions still control large swathes of the mineral-rich, deeply impoverished country, leaving it one of the most unstable nations on the African continent.

    Emily Trostle, an attorney representing several of the deportees, warned that the migrants face extreme risk of being forcibly expelled onward to the countries they originally fled—a pattern that has repeated across other U.S. deportation operations in Africa. “These individuals are being removed from the United States and abandoned in a country where they have no status, no connection and no support network,” Trostle told AFP. “We fear they will ultimately be forced to return to the countries they originally fled.”

    The Trump administration has defended its third-country deportation policy, arguing that it is only prohibited from sending people with “withholding of removal” status directly to their country of origin, where they face verified danger. The administration claims this legal framework allows it to send such migrants to any other nation, even if those countries then choose to deport them onward to their original home. Past cases have already documented widespread abuse: deportees and their legal teams have reported unsanitary, overcrowded holding conditions in Ghana and prolonged, indefinite detention in Eswatini. In some cases, migrants deported to African hubs including Ghana and Equatorial Guinea have already been sent back to home countries where U.S. immigration judges previously ruled they would face persecution or harm.

    This landing in Bangui is believed to be the first U.S. deportation operation carried out under a new opaque deportation agreement between Washington and the CAR, one of several non-transparent deals the Trump administration has struck with African governments in recent months. Local civil society leaders say CAR authorities have refused to share any details about the agreement or the status of the incoming migrants. “We don’t know if these migrants who are coming to and will be received on Central African soil are in transit or if they are entitled to apply for asylum,” said Paul Crescent Beninga, a Central African political scientist and civil society leader. “The government doesn’t want to provide any answers, the government isn’t communicating.”

    A U.S. State Department spokesperson reiterated the administration’s hardline stance on immigration but declined to answer questions about the terms of the deal with the CAR, saying only: “we remain unwavering in our commitment to end illegal and mass immigration.” CAR authorities also did not respond to requests for comment.

    The controversial operation comes just one week after a landmark lawsuit was filed against the U.S. and Equatorial Guinea at the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Africa’s top regional human rights body. The suit seeks to halt U.S. deportations to Equatorial Guinea, which has become another key transit hub for U.S. third-country deportations, and block the Equatorial Guinean government from expelling migrants onward to their high-risk home countries.