分类: technology

  • Apple to pay $250m to iPhone buyers over AI features lawsuit

    Apple to pay $250m to iPhone buyers over AI features lawsuit

    Technology giant Apple has agreed to pay out $250 million (£184 million) to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by iPhone customers, who accused the company of deceptive marketing around its promised Apple Intelligence artificial intelligence capabilities. The legal dispute, which was resolved in a settlement filed with a California federal court on Tuesday, closes out consolidated claims that were first filed last year. Notably, Apple has not admitted to any wrongdoing as part of the agreement.

    The suit centers on allegations that Apple misled consumers through false advertising for its Apple Intelligence suite, a lineup of AI-powered upgrades that includes a heavily promoted overhaul of its Siri voice assistant. Plaintiffs claim the company marketed advanced AI features that were not available at the time of purchase, have not launched to date, and may not roll out for at least two years — if they ever arrive at all.

    Under the terms of the settlement, eligible consumers who purchased either an iPhone 15 or iPhone 16 between June 2024 and March 2025 will receive payouts ranging from $25 to $95 per device.

    An Apple spokesperson addressed the litigation, noting that the claims only targeted the availability of two specific features out of the full slate of Apple Intelligence tools the company has already rolled out. “We resolved this matter to stay focused on doing what we do best, delivering the most innovative products and services to our users,” the spokesperson said.

    In a revised complaint submitted last week for the consolidated class action, legal representatives for the iPhone buyers argued that Apple’s AI marketing campaign constituted deceptive commercial practice. “Apple promoted AI capabilities that did not exist at the time, do not exist now, and will not exist for two or more years, if ever, all while marketing them as the breakthrough innovation,” the legal team wrote.

    The complaint further alleges that Apple rushed this aggressive AI marketing push specifically to keep pace in the high-stakes global AI race currently being led by newer players like OpenAI and Anthropic. Outgoing Apple CEO Tim Cook has faced repeated public criticism over recent years from analysts and consumers who argue the company has lagged behind competitors in rolling out breakthrough innovative products.

    A core part of the plaintiffs’ argument centers on the promised upgraded Siri, which Apple marketed as a transformative update that would turn the tool from a “limited voice interface into a full-fledged personal AI assistant.” According to the legal team, this reimagined Siri never materialized for consumers, and the recently launched iPhone 16 shipped to customers without any trace of the full Apple Intelligence platform Apple had promoted.

  • Google DeepMind staff unionise over Israel and US military ties

    Google DeepMind staff unionise over Israel and US military ties

    In a historic move that marks a watershed moment for global tech labor organizing, hundreds of Google DeepMind employees based in the United Kingdom have overwhelmingly voted to form a union, driven by urgent ethical concerns over the misuse of the company’s artificial intelligence technology by the U.S. and Israeli militaries in conflicts involving Iran and Gaza.

    Following the internal ballot held among Communication Workers Union (CWU) members at DeepMind, official results showed a 98% majority in support of unionization. On Tuesday, workers formally submitted a request to Google DeepMind’s leadership to recognize both the CWU and Unite the Union as their official workplace representatives. If recognized, this organizing effort will become the first formal union at a major global frontier artificial intelligence research lab, according to campaign organizers.

    At the core of the workers’ demands is an immediate end to the provision of Google AI tools to the Israeli military and U.S. defense entities. Additional demands include the reinstatement of a previously discarded company pledge to refrain from developing AI-powered weapons and mass surveillance tools, the establishment of an independent ethics oversight body with decision-making authority, and formal guarantees that individual employees retain the right to decline work on specific projects on moral or ethical grounds.

    This unionization push is part of a broader global grassroots movement among DeepMind staff, with employees across international locations planning coordinated in-person protests and so-called “research strikes,” a work stoppage action where researchers suspend their regular work to highlight their concerns.

    One anonymous DeepMind employee emphasized that no staff want their cutting-edge AI research to become complicit in violations of international law, noting that the technology is already aiding what the employee called Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza. “Even if our work is only used for administrative purposes, as leadership has repeatedly told us, it is still helping make genocide cheaper, faster, and more efficient,” the worker said. “That must end immediately, as must harm to Iranians and human lives anywhere.”

    The successful unionization vote would cover at least 1,000 DeepMind employees based at the company’s London headquarters. In the formal letter submitted to management, workers have given DeepMind leadership 10 working days to voluntarily recognize the two unions or enter into mediated negotiation talks. If management fails to meet the deadline, workers will launch a formal legal process to force official recognition.

    The vote comes at a time when the UK government is actively pursuing policies to attract major global technology investment, positioning the country as a leading hub for AI innovation. Already, several high-profile AI firms including Anthropic have announced plans to expand their London-based operations in recent months.

    CWU national officer John Chadfield framed Tuesday’s announcement as a defining moment for tech workers around the world. “This is a really important moment where tech workers at Google’s frontier AI lab are connecting with some of the most oppressed people in communities around the world in meaningful ways, based on foundational values of solidarity and trade unionism,” Chadfield said. “By exercising their rights to collectivise they are in a strong position to demand their employer stop circling the ethical drain of military-industrial contracts, echoing the sentiment of many working people in the UK and elsewhere.”

    This latest labor action is the culmination of years of growing internal unrest among Google employees over the company’s military contracts. Earlier this year, more than 600 Google staff across the company’s AI and cloud divisions signed an open letter urging leadership to cut off the Pentagon’s access to Google technology for classified military operations. Google previously drew widespread backlash after firing dozens of employees who participated in protests against Project Nimbus, a joint initiative with Amazon to provide cloud and AI services to the Israeli government amid the ongoing military campaign in Gaza. In 2023, the company also faced heavy criticism for its acquisition of Israeli cloud security firm Wiz, which was founded by former veterans of Unit 8200, the Israeli military’s elite cyber espionage and surveillance unit.

  • ‘I thought he was going to hit me’ OpenAI co-founder says of Musk

    ‘I thought he was going to hit me’ OpenAI co-founder says of Musk

    OAKLAND, Calif. — In dramatic testimony unfolding in a Northern California federal courtroom, OpenAI President and co-founder Greg Brockman has laid bare a tense 2017 confrontation with Elon Musk, the billionaire initial co-founder who is now locked in a bitter legal battle over OpenAI’s shift to a for-profit structure. The trial, which is scheduled to run a full month, entered its second week this week as the two sides clash over what Musk knew about OpenAI’s planned transition away from its original non-profit founding model.

    Brockman, who is named as a defendant in Musk’s lawsuit seeking to roll back OpenAI’s corporate restructuring, told jurors that Musk began pushing aggressively to seize greater control of the startup just two years after its 2015 founding. The billionaire reportedly tried to court both Brockman and fellow early co-founder Ilya Sutskever to build support for his power grab, a courtship that Brockman described as systematic “buttering up.”

    When Brockman rejected Musk’s proposal to expand the billionaire’s influence over the company, Brockman testified, Musk’s demeanor shifted suddenly and sharply. The confrontation grew so heated that Brockman told the jury “I actually thought he was going to hit me.” The meeting wrapped up immediately after the exchange, with Musk announcing he would cut off the financial backing he had provided to OpenAI since its launch.

    Court documents introduced by OpenAI’s legal team included August 2017 text exchanges between Sutskever and Brockman that referenced the pressure campaign, with one message asking: “Will a model 3 make you be willing to accept massively unfavourable terms?”

    The core of Brockman’s testimony has centered on a key point at the heart of the dispute: he confirmed that Musk was fully informed years ago of OpenAI’s long-term plans to adopt a for-profit structure to support massive capital needs for AI research. Founded as a non-profit entity, OpenAI later established a capped-profit subsidiary to raise billions in investor funding, and last year moved to reorient the entire company around its for-profit operations. Musk, who departed the OpenAI board in 2018, has argued the transition violates the founding agreement he helped craft, while OpenAI maintains all changes were done with Musk’s full knowledge.

    Since leaving OpenAI, the startup has grown into one of the world’s most valuable technology firms, following the explosive mainstream success of its flagship product ChatGPT. Musk, who has become one of OpenAI’s most prominent public critics, launched his own rival AI startup xAI in 2023, directly competing with OpenAI’s dominant chatbot.

    The next witness expected to take the stand is Shivon Zilis, a former OpenAI board member who is also the mother of four of Musk’s children. During his testimony, Brockman noted that Zilis remained on OpenAI’s board long after Musk left the company, saying “We trusted her to keep the Elon conflict under control.” Zilis departed the board in March 2023, just as Musk prepared to publicly launch xAI. Brockman also told jurors that when Zilis informed him she had given birth to twins years ago, he only learned Musk was the father from public reports, after which Zilis clarified the children were conceived via IVF and her relationship with Musk was entirely platonic.

  • US to safety test new AI models from Google, Microsoft, xAI

    US to safety test new AI models from Google, Microsoft, xAI

    In a marked shift from its earlier hands-off approach to artificial intelligence oversight, the Trump administration has secured voluntary agreements from three major tech players — Google, Microsoft, and Elon Musk-led xAI — to submit all new AI tools and capabilities for pre-release testing by the U.S. Department of Commerce, three people familiar with the arrangement confirmed this week.

    Under the new pacts, the companies will send their cutting-edge AI models to the Commerce Department’s Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) for independent evaluation before the tools launch to the general public. The partnerships expand on earlier voluntary safety commitments secured during the Biden administration from leading AI developers including OpenAI and Anthropic, which established the framework for third-party testing of high-risk AI capabilities before public release. All participating companies’ models will undergo rigorous assessment of both functional capabilities and cybersecurity safeguards under the expanded program.

    “These expanded industry collaborations help us scale our work in the public interest at a critical moment,” CAISI director Chris Fall said in a statement announcing the new agreements.

    The scope of CAISI’s evaluations covers three core areas: hands-on functional testing, collaborative public-private research, and the development of industry-wide best practices for safe commercial AI deployment. Each of the three new participating firms brings high-profile, widely used AI tools to the testing framework: Google’s flagship model, Gemini, developed by its DeepMind subsidiary, already powers consumer Google products and is currently in use by U.S. defense and military agencies. Microsoft’s most prominent public AI offering is the CoPilot generative assistant integrated across its productivity and cloud platforms. xAI, which is controlled by Musk’s SpaceX, has only one public product to date: the Grok chatbot, which drew widespread public criticism and scrutiny last year after it was found to generate non-consensual deepfake pornographic images that undressed depicted individuals without consent.

    CAISI officials noted Tuesday that the center has already completed 40 prior AI tool evaluations, including assessments of multiple unreleased state-of-the-art models. The center declined to specify whether any models evaluated in earlier rounds have been blocked from public release over safety concerns, and representatives for Google, Microsoft, and SpaceX did not respond to multiple requests for comment on the new testing agreements.

    The expansion of pre-release voluntary testing marks a notable departure from the Trump administration’s initial policy stance. When Trump took office, his administration adopted a largely deregulatory, hands-off approach to AI oversight, framing heavy regulation as a barrier to U.S. global competitiveness in the fast-growing sector. Last year, Trump signed a series of executive orders that laid out his administration’s official AI Action Plan, which he said would “remove red tape and onerous regulation” surrounding AI development to ensure the U.S. “wins” the global race to lead AI advancement and control the technology.

    But shifting national security priorities and growing industry warnings about unregulated powerful AI have pushed the administration to revise its approach. The U.S. military has rapidly expanded its own adoption of AI tools for operational and planning use in recent years, while leading AI developer Anthropic made headlines late last year when it publicly announced it had developed a new high-capability model called Mytho, which it deemed too powerful and high-risk to release to the public. Last month, senior Trump administration staff held a closed-door meeting with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, as first reported by the BBC, amid an ongoing legal dispute between Anthropic and the U.S. Department of Defense. The lawsuit stems from Anthropic’s refusal to remove built-in safety guardrails from its models for unfiltered government use.

  • States across the wildfire-prone Western US are using AI for early detection

    States across the wildfire-prone Western US are using AI for early detection

    Against a backdrop of escalating wildfire risk driven by climate change, artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming a critical new tool for early wildfire detection across fire-prone regions of the western United States, already proving its ability to stop blazes before they turn into catastrophic infernos.

    The technology delivered a convincing proof of concept on a March afternoon in Arizona’s Coconino National Forest, when an AI-enabled monitoring camera picked up a faint plume of smoke that did not match the signature of cloud cover or wind-blown dust. After human analysts confirmed the anomaly, alerts were immediately dispatched to Arizona’s state forest service and Arizona Public Service (APS), the state’s largest electric utility. First responders arrived on scene quickly and contained the resulting Diamond Fire to just 7 acres (2.8 hectares), a fraction of the size it could have reached if detected hours later.

    The Diamond Fire interception is far from an isolated success. As record-breaking high temperatures and record-low winter snowpack stoke fears of an extreme wildfire season, state agencies, power utilities and private tech firms have been rolling out AI monitoring systems across remote, high-risk regions where human spotters or casual 911 reports often fail to catch blazes in their earliest, most controllable stages.

    To date, APS already operates roughly 40 active AI smoke-detection cameras across Arizona, with expansion plans to bring the total to 71 by the end of the current summer. The Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management has also deployed seven of its own AI units, while Colorado-based utility Xcel Energy has installed 126 AI cameras, with goals to bring the system to all but one of the eight states it serves by the end of the year. In California, the ALERTCalifornia network operates more than 1,200 AI-integrated cameras that follow a detection model similar to Arizona’s system.

    “Earlier detection means we can launch aircraft and personnel to it and keep those fires as small as we can,” explained John Truett, fire management officer for the Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management.

    Unlike populated areas where residents often spot and report fires quickly, most high-risk unpopulated rural and remote zones lack consistent human observation. It is exactly these gap areas that AI monitoring fills, providing 24/7 surveillance that frequently outpaces 911 reports by a significant margin. According to Neal Driscoll, a geology and geophysics professor at the University of California, San Diego and founder of ALERTCalifornia, human oversight paired with ongoing AI training has kept false positive rates very low, and the technology consistently outperforms traditional 911-based detection timelines.

    “It’s just the ones where we won’t get a 911 call for a long time, it is extremely helpful to have that AI always monitoring that camera,” said Brent Pascua, a battalion chief for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire). “In many cases, we’ve started a response before 911 was even called, and in a few cases, we’ve actually started a response, went there, put the fire out, and never received a 911 call.”

    Pano AI, one of the leading providers of this technology, integrates high-definition camera feeds, satellite data and artificial intelligence to scan for early smoke signs. Since launching in 2020, the company has seen surging demand for its systems, which are now deployed across 17 U.S. states plus Canada and Australia, serving forestry operators, public agencies and utilities including APS. In 2025 alone, the company’s technology detected 725 wildfires across the U.S.

    “In many of these situations, we hear from stakeholders that the visual intelligence, the time, really, really gives them a head start and some of these could have taken off into hundreds if not thousands of acres,” said Arvind Satyam, Pano AI co-founder and chief commercial officer. APS meteorologist Cindy Kobold confirms the technology delivers an average 45-minute head start over the first incoming 911 call, a gap that can make the difference between a contained small blaze and a destructive megafire.

    Satyam notes that the development of this technology was directly driven by the growing wildfire crisis fueled by climate change. Rising global temperatures from fossil fuel emissions have created drier, more fire-prone conditions that increase the frequency, intensity and speed of wildfire spread, and existing management tools have not kept pace. AI detection fills this gap, helping first responders act more effectively while protecting communities and critical infrastructure.

    Despite its clear benefits, the technology still faces notable limitations and challenges. The most significant barrier for many agencies is upfront and ongoing cost: Pano AI charges approximately $50,000 per camera annually, a price that includes 24/7 monitoring support and fire risk analysis. False alarms remain a persistent issue, wasting valuable first responder time and resources even as training reduces their frequency. Even when the AI correctly identifies a fire, it cannot guide decision-making on response strategy – questions of when to deploy crews, whether to order evacuations, or how to prioritize resources still require human judgment and decision support systems.

    In dense urban areas, where residents already report fires quickly, the technology offers less benefit, and it cannot keep pace with rapidly shifting fire behavior during extreme weather events such as the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires, when hurricane-force winds reshaped fire lines hourly. Proponents emphasize that AI is designed to complement, not replace, human firefighting teams.

    “As the fire moves and shifts around, that’s where the human factor comes in and decides which tactics are best in fighting the fire. AI can only do so much,” Pascua said. “It just provides that real time information where we can make better decisions on the fire ground.”

    AI’s role in wildfire management extends far beyond early detection, researchers note. The technology can already map optimal zones for controlled burns and vegetation thinning, and monitor air quality for early smoke signatures with far greater sensitivity than traditional consumer detectors. At George Mason University, professor Chaowei “Phil” Yang is leading a collaboration with California State University Los Angeles, the city of Los Angeles and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory to develop an AI system that forecasts wildfire spread and predicts which communities will face the worst smoke pollution impacts. The system will generate real-time maps to help agencies make faster, more effective decisions around evacuations, road and school closures, and public health warnings, with a target operational launch within three years.

    Experts agree that AI integration in wildfire management is no longer a future concept – it is already deployed in active response, and its use will only expand in coming years. “AI in wildfires, it’s no longer just speculative. It’s really being used,” said Patrick Roberts, a senior RAND Corporation researcher who recently completed a study on innovation in wildfire management. “The future is AI everywhere, and the lines will blur between AI wildfire detection and just wildfire detection as the lines will blur in other areas of our life.”

  • California to begin ticketing driverless cars that violate traffic laws

    California to begin ticketing driverless cars that violate traffic laws

    As autonomous vehicle (AV) technology becomes an increasingly common sight on streets across California, a longstanding regulatory gap has finally been closed: starting this July, law enforcement will for the first time be able to hold driverless car manufacturers accountable when their vehicles break traffic laws.

  • Africa’s cellphone towers turn to solar as diesel costs surge

    Africa’s cellphone towers turn to solar as diesel costs surge

    Global market volatility triggered by the Iran conflict has sent diesel prices soaring across Africa, creating new urgency for an already unfolding transition in the continent’s telecommunications sector: moving hundreds of thousands of cellphone towers from fossil fuel-powered generators to solar energy systems.

    At present, roughly 500,000 telecommunications towers across Africa depend on diesel to stay operational. In recent weeks, global fuel supplies have tightened dramatically following the outbreak of conflict in the Middle East, leaving many import-dependent African nations grappling with steep price hikes and intermittent supply shortages. These disruptions have forced both national governments and private telecom operators to reevaluate long-held energy strategies.

    While the move toward renewable energy for telecom infrastructure predates the latest price shocks, driven by years of steady cost pressures and global climate action commitments, industry leaders confirm the Iran conflict has drastically speed up the transition timeline. “Diesel has always been a major cost, but recent global events have made it even more volatile,” explained Lande Abudu, senior Africa energy specialist at GSMA, the global industry body representing mobile network operators. “That strengthens the case for solar and hybrid solutions immeasurably.”

    Across the continent, operators are rapidly rolling out hybrid energy systems that pair solar panels with large-scale battery storage, retaining only small diesel generators for rare, extended periods of low sunlight. Many providers have set long-term targets to transition all their rural and off-grid tower sites — where extending national power infrastructure is prohibitively expensive — to full solar operation.

    Unlike most developed markets, where the vast majority of telecom towers are connected to centralized national electricity grids (with diesel only reserved as backup for outages), Africa’s underdeveloped grid infrastructure has left the sector almost entirely dependent on standalone diesel generators for decades. These large industrial units require regular manual refueling, exposing operators to logistical challenges, theft, and maintenance costs. Similar diesel-reliant transitions are now underway in parts of Southeast Asia such as Indonesia, but Africa’s shift stands out for its scale and potential transformative impact.

    Recent major industry investments underscore the accelerating momentum. Last month, U.S.-owned Atlas Tower Kenya announced a $52.5 million investment to build 300 new purpose-built solar-powered telecom towers, serving leading regional operators including Safaricom, Airtel and Telkom Kenya. Currently, 82% of the firm’s existing 500 towers already run on solar, a benchmark many industry peers are now working to match.

    The economic case for transitioning has become increasingly compelling in recent years, even before the latest global price shock. For off-grid tower sites, energy costs can account for as much as 60% of total operating expenses, and diesel’s long-term price trend has consistently trended upward, compounded by local challenges from poor transport infrastructure to fuel theft.

    Vodacom Africa, which operates across six African nations and holds subsidiary stakes in Kenya and Ethiopia through Safaricom, reported a 5% year-over-year rise in total energy costs to $300 million in 2025, driven by higher fuel and electricity tariffs. In response, Safaricom raised $153.6 million in green bonds last year specifically to fund its tower transition to solar. In Nigeria, where government removed long-standing fuel subsidies in 2023, diesel prices have already jumped as much as 200% in a single year, leaving operators paying $400 million annually just to keep diesel-powered towers online. The latest price increases tied to the Iran conflict have added even more pressure to move quickly.

    Telecom firms across the continent are responding by scaling up clean energy deployment at an unprecedented rate. Local firm iSAT Africa is rolling out solar-powered towers supported by innovative green financing models, while regional giants including Orange, Vodacom, MTN Group and Airtel Africa are expanding solar and hybrid systems across their entire network footprints. “By replacing diesel-powered telecom towers with fully solar-powered infrastructure, we expect to reduce the carbon emissions associated with mobile network operations,” iSAT Africa CEO Rakesh Kukreja said in March while announcing new funding for the projects.

    Early data from completed transitions already shows significant cost and operational gains. MTN’s operations in South Africa have cut total fuel spending by roughly 30% after switching to solar, while Airtel Africa, in partnership with ENGIE Energy Access, has reduced diesel consumption by more than 50% at its tower sites in Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo. For Vodacom Africa, connecting towers to national grids where possible and expanding solar and battery storage sits at the core of its 2025 sustainability and operational strategy, company documents show.

    Beyond cost savings, the transition delivers major improvements to network reliability, a critical benefit for underserved rural communities. Solar-powered systems are far less vulnerable to the fuel shortages and generator breakdowns that have long plagued diesel-reliant networks. Even before the latest conflict, regular outages tied to fuel shortages in parts of northern Nigeria and Congo disrupted everything from mobile money transactions to life-saving emergency communications.

    GSMA data estimates that the shift to solar could help close Africa’s persistent digital connectivity gap, where roughly 65% of people who could access life-changing mobile internet remain unconnected. “Renewable energy systems enable faster and more cost-effective expansion into underserved areas,” Abudu noted.

    On the ground in rural off-grid communities in northern Kenya, residents are already seeing tangible improvements. “Before this telecommunication mast was installed, we struggled to process mobile money payment or even call for help during medical emergencies,” said Martin Imwatok, a local teacher. “When these towers go off, business and life stop.”

    Africa’s uniquely high reliance on diesel, driven by underdeveloped grid infrastructure, makes the transition more complex than in other regions — but also means it carries far greater transformative potential. Regulators across the continent are now exploring ways to amplify the benefits of the shift; in Nigeria, the national telecom regulator has encouraged operators to integrate solar-powered towers into local solar minigrids that can supply electricity to nearby communities as well.

    “These telecom towers can act as anchor clients for solar minigrids, supplying electricity not only to the towers but also to nearby homes, businesses and public services,” explained Aminu Maida, head of the Nigerian Communications Commission.

    With global fuel prices set to remain volatile amid ongoing Middle East tensions, industry experts say the case for renewable energy for Africa’s telecom sector will only grow stronger. “This is no longer just about climate,” Abudu said. “It’s about resilience, cost and keeping Africa connected.”

    This reporting from The Associated Press on climate and environment receives financial support from multiple private foundations, with AP retaining full editorial control over all content.

  • Bright idea? UK firm pioneers mini data centres using lampposts

    Bright idea? UK firm pioneers mini data centres using lampposts

    For decades, innovators have experimented with placing data centres in increasingly unconventional locations: Microsoft sank an entire facility beneath the ocean surface, while Elon Musk has floated the idea of launching data infrastructure into orbit. Now, a United Kingdom-based technology firm is pioneering a new approach that turns ubiquitous street infrastructure into a network of distributed computing power, with a landmark deal to roll out 50,000 units in a Nigerian state already sealed.

    Warwickshire-headquartered Conflow Power Group (CPG) has developed the iLamp, a solar-powered connected smart lamppost designed to operate both as standard street lighting and a revenue-generating node in a decentralized AI data centre. When thousands of iLamps are networked together, the company says their combined low-power processing capacity can deliver the functional equivalent of a traditional centralized data centre, while cutting emissions by avoiding draws on fossil-fuel powered national electricity grids.

    Each unit is fitted with a cylindrical solar panel that charges an on-board battery, which in turn powers an energy-efficient AI-capable processor. CPG chairman Edward Fitzpatrick explained to the BBC’s Tech Life programme that recent advances from chip giant NVIDIA have made the concept feasible. “NVIDIA is the company that’s created a small enough chip, powered with 15 watts of power, so it can be powered by solar, and we can put that inside a street light,” Fitzpatrick said.

    Beyond their AI computing function, the smart lampposts integrate AI-powered surveillance capabilities that expand their use cases. For the Nigerian deployment, each iLamp will come equipped with a camera able to identify parking violations, speeding motorists, and drivers who do not wear seatbelts. Smaller-scale trials of the technology are already underway in the car park of Warwick Hospital in the UK, where the units provide CCTV monitoring and automatic number plate recognition. Fitzpatrick added that the technology could eventually be used to locate wanted or missing persons via facial recognition, with final-stage negotiations ongoing to deploy the full feature set with public schools and local governments in Florida, U.S.

    The inclusion of facial recognition capabilities has already sparked potential privacy concerns, with critics highlighting longstanding risks of algorithmic bias, misuse of surveillance data, and erosion of personal privacy. In response, CPG emphasized that it will only roll out facial recognition functionality in formal partnership with relevant regulatory authorities, and in full alignment with all local and national privacy and security laws. Fitzpatrick even suggested the connected lampposts could open up new forms of public interaction, saying: “you could walk past the streetlight, put your two fingers up like a victory sign and that could be voting for something. That could be a poll which you could put out onto social media”.

    The project comes as rising energy and water consumption from AI systems has emerged as a major global environmental concern. Some estimates already put the total annual energy use of global AI infrastructure on par with the entire United Kingdom’s annual electricity consumption, with water use for data centre cooling also drawing growing scrutiny. CPG’s solar-powered distributed model aims to address this carbon footprint issue, but industry experts have cautioned that the technology is not a wholesale replacement for large-scale centralized data centres.

    John Booth, managing director of sustainability consultancy Carbon3IT Ltd and a member of BCS, the UK’s Chartered Institute for IT, noted that the iLamp model fills a specific niche rather than replacing traditional infrastructure. “The iLamps could have value as a relatively low-cost solution that can be used for small AI applications in conjunction with other larger sites,” Booth told the BBC.

    Veteran data centre industry academic Professor Ian Bitterlin echoed this assessment, pointing out that decentralized street-side nodes cannot match the performance of large facilities built for training cutting-edge large language models. A key limiting factor, Bitterlin explained, is the physical distance between individual lampposts, which creates latency that makes high-speed coordinated computing for large AI tasks unfeasible. He also flagged physical security as a major ongoing concern, a challenge that Fitzpatrick openly acknowledges. “If people realise that there’s a $2,000 unit inside there they might try and steal it,” Fitzpatrick said, adding that CPG has engineered the units to permanently disable (or “fry”) the processor if it is improperly removed from the lamppost.

    Despite their limitations for large-scale AI training, Bitterlin noted that the iLamps could fill a growing need for edge computing infrastructure. As more AI applications require processing power located close to end-users, the lampposts could act as accessible access points that connect users to larger, more powerful centralized data centres running big AI models, similar to how mobile phone masts support cellular networks.

    For the landmark Katsina State deployment in Nigeria, the state government will generate ongoing revenue by leasing the collective processing capacity of the iLamp network to AI companies. After an initial three-year period, CPG will take a 20% cut of all revenue generated by the network. Fitzpatrick described Africa as the company’s primary target market for scaling the technology, citing abundant solar resources, supportive regulatory frameworks, and strong demand for basic street lighting infrastructure as key advantages. “Africa is our prime target because there’s plenty of sunshine which is great, they’ve got more relaxed rules and regulations, they want us to put the street lights on the street,” he said.

    While the iLamps will be manufactured in Morocco, Taiwan and Latvia, CPG is also building a local assembly factory in Katsina to support the deployment. In a statement welcoming the deal, Dr Hafiz Ibrahim Ahmad, Special Adviser on Power and Energy to the Katsina State government, called the project a milestone for African tech innovation, saying the state is now “home to the only distributed AI data centre of its kind anywhere on the African continent”. He added that the project would deliver wide-ranging benefits beyond new tech infrastructure, including “safer streets, real-time crime and terrorism prevention, free public internet and a revenue stream that flows back into the state”.

  • Pentagon says US military to be an ‘AI-first’ fighting force

    Pentagon says US military to be an ‘AI-first’ fighting force

    The U.S. Department of Defense is advancing a sweeping push to embed artificial intelligence across military operations, announcing eight new expanded partnerships with leading American technology companies that aims to reposition the U.S. military as an “AI-first” fighting force. The agreements, finalized Friday, bring Google, OpenAI, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, SpaceX, Oracle, Nvidia, and emerging startup Reflection into the Pentagon’s growing AI ecosystem, clearing the way for these firms’ AI tools to be used for any lawful military and operational purpose.

    In a public statement following the announcement, Pentagon officials emphasized that the multi-vendor strategy is designed to avoid overreliance on a single technology provider, a vulnerability commonly referred to as “vendor lock-in.” By tapping into a diverse range of AI capabilities built across the robust U.S. technology sector, defense leaders say warfighters will gain access to cutting-edge tools to respond faster to threats and protect national security. The department also highlighted early successes from its existing military AI platform, launched last year: more than one million defense personnel across the department have already adopted the platform, cutting processing time for many critical tasks from months to just days.

    The announcement comes amid a high-profile public and legal split with leading AI developer Anthropic, which is notably absent from the new set of contracts. The San Francisco-based firm, which was the first AI company to deploy its models for U.S. classified government work, still has its Claude chatbot tools in use across multiple defense and civilian agencies. However, the relationship collapsed earlier this year after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei publicly raised ethical alarms over the potential misuse of powerful AI, warning that defense agencies could use the technology to carry out mass domestic surveillance and deploy fully autonomous lethal weapons. The company refused to agree to contract language allowing “any lawful use” of its AI tools for military purposes.

    In response, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth labeled Anthropic a “supply chain risk,” barring the firm from new government work. Anthropic has filed a lawsuit against the federal government alleging unlawful retaliation for its ethical stance, with the case scheduled to go to court in September.

    The rift between Anthropic and the Pentagon has opened new opportunities for competing AI firms to deepen their ties to the U.S. military. OpenAI, maker of the ChatGPT large language model, was the first to capitalize on the shift, finalizing its own contract with the Pentagon in late February. A company spokesperson framed the deal as a commitment to equipping U.S. defense personnel with the world’s most advanced tools, noting Friday’s announcement was simply a formalization of the existing agreement.

    For Google, the partnership marks a milestone: while the company’s Gemini chatbot is already used across some civilian government agencies, this contract will clear Gemini to handle classified defense work for the first time. The expansion has already sparked internal pushback: earlier this week, hundreds of Google employees, including dozens of researchers from the company’s leading AI research arm DeepMind, sent an open letter to CEO Sundar Pichai urging the company to abandon the deeper military partnership. Google has not yet issued a public response to the request or the contract announcement.

    Other partners bring unique AI capabilities to the new framework. SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, is the parent company of xAI, the startup behind the controversial Grok AI chatbot. While xAI’s model is widely seen as less technically advanced than offerings from Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google, the addition of SpaceX extends the Pentagon’s access to Musk’s sprawling aerospace and technology ecosystem. Nvidia, a leading producer of AI computing hardware, will contribute its open-source Nemotron large language model, while startup Reflection will offer its open-source Reflection 70B model; neither firm will provide hardware as part of the current agreement. Longtime government cloud providers Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, and Oracle will continue to host the defense department’s online AI infrastructure, expanding their existing services to accommodate the growing volume of AI models and tools. None of the firms—SpaceX, Nvidia, Reflection, Amazon, Microsoft, or Oracle—have responded to requests for comment on the new contracts.

    Defense Secretary Hegseth has made accelerating AI adoption across the U.S. military a top priority, arguing that access to advanced AI has become a core determinant of military success in modern conflict. For years, the Pentagon has worked to build out its AI capabilities, and Friday’s announcement represents the most significant expansion of those efforts to date.

  • China’s Manus AI case sets red lines to bar ‘Singapore washing’

    China’s Manus AI case sets red lines to bar ‘Singapore washing’

    China has formally blocked Meta’s proposed $2 billion acquisition of Manus, a high-profile Chinese general-purpose agentic AI startup, and moved to clear up misperceptions around the decision, emphasizing that the prohibition targets regulatory circumvasion rather than domestic firms’ legitimate overseas expansion or foreign inbound investment.

    The ban was issued on Monday by the Office of the Working Mechanism for Security Review of Foreign Investment under the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), which ordered the involved parties to unwind the unreported transaction entirely. In the days following the ruling, Chinese state media outlets published a series of explanatory commentaries to outline the policy logic behind the decision, aiming to avoid misinterpretation that the move signals a broader crackdown on foreign capital or restrictions on Chinese tech firms going global.

    Chinese policy analysts stress that Beijing does not intend for the Manus ruling to send a misleading signal to the global investment community. As a CCTV-affiliated social media account Yuyuan Tantian clarified in a Thursday article, China’s existing Measures for the Security Review of Foreign Investment draw clear boundaries for regulatory scrutiny. Under the framework, all investments touching on national defense security require mandatory declaration regardless of foreign stake size, while for key sectors including core information technology, internet products and services, and critical technologies, any transaction that grants actual control to a foreign investor falls within mandatory review scope.

    Manus, the article noted, fits clearly into this defined key technology category as a developer of general-purpose AI agent systems. Meta’s proposed acquisition would have transferred full actual control of the startup to the US tech giant, yet neither party submitted the required proactive declaration to Chinese regulators, making the ruling a straightforward application of existing law.

    The article added that Chinese regulators assess risk across three core dimensions: technology, talent and data. All of Manus’s core assets — including its foundational algorithms, training data and core R&D team — were developed by domestic teams within China’s borders, so any transfer of control overseas legally requires a national security review. The commentary also pointed to growing global trends of expanding security review scopes and blurred threat definitions that specifically target other countries’ AI development, a practice that China must guard against to protect its own strategic technology ecosystem. Even as it enforces security rules, China remains committed to supporting AI innovation and maintaining an open market for foreign investment, the article emphasized.

    The Manus transaction grew out of a new regulatory workaround that has emerged since the United States barred American investment from China’s domestic AI sector in October 2024, dubbed “Singapore washing.” The term describes the practice of Chinese AI firms spinning off operations or relocating their registered headquarters to Singapore to avoid US investment restrictions and raise foreign capital. In the case of Manus, the startup restructured its operations to sever formal ties with its Chinese origins to secure Meta’s investment, a strategy that the ruling has now invalidated.

    Manus first captured global tech industry attention when it made its high-profile debut in March 2025. Unlike conventional large language models such as ChatGPT or DeepSeek, Manus is positioned as a general-purpose AI agent capable of completing complex, multi-step tasks traditionally handled by white-collar workers. In promotional demonstrations, co-founder Xiao Hong showcased the system’s capacity to sort through 10 candidate resumes, identify a New York City property matching a set budget, and analyze stock correlation trends between Nvidia, Marvell Technology and TSMC, leading the startup to adopt the slogan “Leave it to Manus.”

    The acquisition deal began taking shape in 2025, as Manus restructured to move its registered headquarters to Singapore between June and July that year. It reorganized under a new Singapore-based operating entity, Butterfly Effect Pte, reduced its mainland Chinese team from more than 120 employees to just 40 core members who were relocated to Singapore, deleted all Chinese-language social media accounts, and blocked IP addresses based in China from accessing its official website. By the end of 2025, Manus presented itself as a fully Singapore-based company, and Meta announced the $2 billion acquisition on December 30, with Xiao Hong slated to take a senior leadership role at the US firm.

    Chinese regulators launched their formal review of the unreported transaction in January 2026, and by late March, Xiao Hong and co-founder Ji Yichao were barred from leaving China as the review progressed. The formal ban on the deal was issued on April 27.

    According to Chinese analysts, Manus crossed three non-negotiable red lines in its restructuring and dealmaking: technology sovereignty, data sovereignty and national security. “Where the technology originates determines jurisdiction,” explained Guangdong-based business columnist Shengchandui. Manus’s core algorithms and core team were built entirely within China, so shifting the company offshore and selling it to a foreign buyer amounts to unauthorized export of domestically developed strategic capabilities, a form of “technology smuggling” that weakens China’s domestic innovation base. The columnist added that Manus processes vast volumes of user data, much of it originating from Chinese users, so transferring control overseas creates unacceptable risks of data leakage, particularly under existing rules governing cross-border data transfers. As AI agents are emerging as core infrastructure for digital work, communication and software development, putting a system built on Chinese technology and data under full foreign control creates unacceptable national security risks, he noted.

    Zhu Youping, a researcher at the NDRC’s State Information Center, clarified that the ruling is not a restriction on legitimate global expansion by Chinese firms, but a prohibition on efforts to evade national regulation. “If the proposed acquisition is completed, Meta would obtain 100% control in Manus, but neither Meta nor Manus had declared this to the Chinese regulators,” he said. Regulators apply a “look-through” approach that focuses on the actual origin of technology, the source of training data and ownership of core talent, rather than just the jurisdiction where a company is registered. “Manus’s relocation to Singapore is essentially a case of using domestic resources to incubate value and monetizing it through an offshore structure to bypass oversight,” Zhu added.

    Beyond blocking the unauthorized transaction, Chinese authorities have signaled that they want Manus to remain rooted in China to contribute to the country’s fast-growing domestic AI industry. In a Tuesday editorial, the Global Times noted that “China’s AI industry has entered a phase of rapid development, with a sustained burst of innovative vitality, making it a fertile ground for global AI innovation. We hope that more technology and innovation enterprises, including Manus, can find their place in this blue ocean in China, develop confidently, grow larger and stronger and achieve better development and breakthroughs.”

    The Manus ruling aligns with Beijing’s latest policy push to scale up domestic AI adoption for economic growth. On April 21, China’s State Council released a policy document outlining 20 measures to expand and upgrade the country’s AI sector, setting a target of growing total industry output to more than 100 trillion yuan (approximately $13.8 trillion) by 2030, up from 81 trillion yuan in 2025. The policy specifically supports deployment of AI tools in high-impact areas including intelligent programming, contract review, financial services and supply chain optimization, and calls for the construction of national AI application testing bases.

    Pang Chaoran, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation (CAITEC), said the new policy marks a clear shift in China’s AI strategy: instead of focusing primarily on subsidizing AI model training, Beijing is now encouraging private service sector firms to adopt AI models and agents at scale. By driving widespread adoption of AI tools across industries, the government aims to accelerate commercialization of AI innovation, embed the technology deeper into real economic activity, and generate new growth momentum for both the service and technology sectors.