分类: society

  • Moment US Navy jet stuns packed Florida beach with low flypast

    Moment US Navy jet stuns packed Florida beach with low flypast

    On a sun-drenched weekend at Florida’s iconic Pensacola Beach, where thousands of vacationers had spread out across the sand to soak up warm Gulf of Mexico waters and clear skies, a sudden and unexpected event disrupted the idyllic scene. A high-performance U.S. Navy Blue Angels jet, conducting a low-altitude flypast over the popular coastal recreation spot, generated a powerful shockwave from its jet engines that sent unsecured beach gear—including umbrellas, coolers, beach towels, and folding chairs—hurtling into the air across large swathes of the packed shoreline.

    Witness footage captured beachgoers diving for cover and scrambling to grab their belongings as the roar of the jet engine echoed across the coast, with many expressing shock at how close the aircraft flew to the ground. The Blue Angels, the U.S. Navy’s official flight demonstration squadron, regularly conduct training flights and air show appearances along the Florida Gulf Coast, with Pensacola serving as the squadron’s home base. As of initial reports, there have been no confirmed reports of serious injuries, though multiple beachgoers shared accounts of minor scrapes and scattered personal property left damaged by the unexpected gust of wind from the low flight.

    Local officials have not yet released a statement on why the flypast was conducted over the crowded public beach at the time, but the incident has quickly spread across social media, with viral videos of the moment drawing millions of views and sparking conversation about low-altitude military flight protocols near populated recreation areas.

  • ASIC warns of sophisticated pump-and-dump scams targeting elderly Australians

    ASIC warns of sophisticated pump-and-dump scams targeting elderly Australians

    Australia’s corporate investment regulator, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), has issued an urgent public warning over a sharp rise in increasingly sophisticated pump-and-dump investment scams that have stolen millions of dollars from vulnerable Australian citizens, with elderly Australians bearing the brunt of the harm.

    These coordinated scams operate by leveraging deceptive tactics that many investors struggle to identify: scammers impersonate well-known financial institutions, forge endorsements from high-profile respected finance industry figures, and lure victims into private messaging groups on platforms such as WhatsApp. Once recruited, victims are pressured to purchase shares of low-value, lightly traded public companies to artificially inflate the stock price. After the price reaches a targeted peak, scammers sell off all of their own holdings for a profit, which triggers an immediate collapse in the share price and leaves victim investors holding worthless assets worth only a fraction of their original investment. What makes these scams particularly convincing, ASIC officials note, is that victims actually purchase legitimate shares through registered retail brokers, leading many to mistakenly trust the scheme is authentic.

    One recent, well-documented example illustrates how destructive these scams can be: a targeted stock’s price surged rapidly to nearly $US11 before crashing back to just $US1 in a matter of days, erasing nearly all of the victims’ investment overnight. Scammers have repeatedly used counterfeit endorsements and stolen identities of prominent finance experts; in one high-profile case, scammers created a fake social media post carrying the Commonwealth Bank logo, featuring a man impersonating former CommSec economist Tom Piotrowski to push fraudulent stock recommendations.

    Testimonies collected by ASIC from scam victims lay bare the catastrophic personal and financial toll of these schemes. One 74-year-old retired victim, who was lured into the scam via the fake Piotrowski post, explained how the scammers built trust by sharing a few small, initially profitable stock tips before pressuring her to invest increasing amounts of her retirement savings. The scam included forged branding from both ASIC and the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), leading her to trust the offering was legitimate. “It had the logo, it had ASIC’s name on it, and it had AFCA’s name on it. Now if you see that, how can it be wrong?” she said, noting that after the share price collapsed overnight, she was left unable to return to work and surviving on a small aged pension. Another anonymous victim described being so traumatized by the loss that he did not leave his apartment for a full month. Reports from victims document life-altering harm including ruined retirement savings, home foreclosures, and even relationship breakdowns leading to divorce.

    ASIC data confirms that these pump-and-dump scams are growing at an alarming rate, with scammers continuously refining their tactics to appear more legitimate. “These scams are becoming increasingly sophisticated, and scammers are exploiting the trust Australians place in recognised experts, financial institutions and investment brands by faking their platforms and endorsements,” ASIC chair Sarah Court explained in the regulator’s warning. Court emphasized that legitimate investment opportunities never come from unsolicited messages from strangers on social media or messaging apps, and urged all Australians to treat any unsolicited stock tip shared through platforms such as WhatsApp or Telegram as a scam. The regulator has called on the public to remain extremely cautious of any investment opportunity promoted through social media or private messaging groups, particularly those that use well-known public identities to build credibility.

  • Eleven people die in fire at Algerian foster care home

    Eleven people die in fire at Algerian foster care home

    A devastating fire that broke out at a foster care facility in central Algiers, the capital city of Algeria, has claimed 11 lives and left 19 others hurt, according to the country’s General Directorate for Civil Protection. As of 6:50 a.m. local time on Thursday morning – which translates to 5:50 a.m. GMT – emergency response teams and firefighters were still on site working to fully extinguish the blaze and secure the area.

    In an official statement released Thursday, the civil protection department confirmed that five people with special needs were successfully evacuated from the burning structure and moved to a secure location, where they are now receiving care. At the time of this report, local authorities have not released further details about the age ranges of the deceased or injured, nor have they shared preliminary information about the possible cause of the fire.

    This is an active, developing breaking news story. Additional updates will be published as more official information becomes available to the public. For more coverage of news across the African continent, audiences can visit BBCAfrica.com, and follow BBC Africa’s social media channels on Twitter at @BBCAfrica, Facebook at BBC Africa, and Instagram at bbcafrica.

  • Italy court to deliver verdict in deadly bridge collapse

    Italy court to deliver verdict in deadly bridge collapse

    Nearly eight years after one of Italy’s deadliest infrastructure disasters claimed 43 lives, an Italian court is scheduled to issue its long-awaited verdict on Thursday for the collapse of Genoa’s Morandi Bridge. The landmark structure, a critical link on the highway connecting France and Italy, crumbled during torrential rain on August 14, 2018, sending dozens of vehicles and their occupants plummeting into the void below. On the eve of the verdict announcement, crowds of victims’ relatives and reporters from dozens of international and domestic media outlets gathered outside the Genoa court building to await the outcome of the four-year legal process.

    Fifty-seven defendants have stood trial throughout the proceedings, facing charges that range from manslaughter and endangerment of public transport safety to falsification of official government documents. Prosecutors have collectively requested more than 400 years of combined prison sentences for all accused parties.

    For many family members, the verdict carries more symbolic than personal weight. Egle Possetti, who leads a support committee for victims’ relatives, lost her sister, nephew, niece, and brother-in-law when the bridge’s ninth pillar gave way. Speaking to reporters from AFP as she entered the court Thursday, Possetti acknowledged that a conviction would not reverse the tragedy or bring her loved ones back. “But clearly the most important thing for the victims is that the truth finally comes out,” she said. She also voiced the frustration shared by many grieving families, noting that through years of trial hearings, “not a single person has said, ‘I bear some responsibility.’ That has been hard.” The court is expected to release its ruling after 12:00 GMT.

    Investigative findings from magistrates paint a damning picture of systemic neglect. Official documents confirm that between the bridge’s inauguration in 1967 and its collapse 51 years later, no minimal structural reinforcement or critical maintenance work was ever completed on the stays of pillar nine. While limited upgrades were carried out on the adjacent 10th and 11th pillars, planned reinforcement work on pillar nine was repeatedly delayed. Lead prosecutor Walter Cotugno famously described the decaying infrastructure as “a ticking time bomb” long before the disaster occurred.

    The majority of defendants are senior executives and lead technicians from Autostrade per l’Italia (ASPI), the company that manages nearly half of Italy’s entire motorway network, and Spea, the private engineering firm contracted to oversee the bridge’s ongoing maintenance. High-profile accused include Giovanni Castellucci, ASPI’s general manager at the time of the collapse, and Antonino Galata, Spea’s former chief executive, alongside multiple senior officials from Italy’s infrastructure ministry. Castellucci faces up to 18 years in prison if convicted, as prosecutors hold him directly responsible for repeatedly postponing critical reinforcement work on pillar nine. Notably, Castellucci is already serving a prison sentence for his role in a separate 2013 highway accident that left 40 people dead when a bus crashed through viaduct barriers.

    Defense attorneys for the accused have centered their case on an alternative narrative, arguing that the collapse was caused by an unidentifiable, hidden construction defect—specifically, internal corrosion of the bridge’s support cables—rather than intentional or negligent lack of maintenance.

    While their former top executives remain on trial, both ASPI and Spea reached an out-of-court settlement with prosecutors prior to the verdict. The agreement requires the firms to pay 29 million euros ($30 million) in compensation to the Italian state. At the time of the 2018 disaster, ASPI was owned by the Atlantia group, which was controlled by Italy’s wealthy Benetton family. Widespread public outrage over the disaster and evidence of systemic neglect forced the Benetton family to sell its entire stake in the company to the Italian state in the aftermath of the tragedy.

  • Suspected ringleader among eight facing court over SA fight club trend

    Suspected ringleader among eight facing court over SA fight club trend

    Weeks after shocking unsanctioned youth fight videos sparked public fury across South Australia, police have announced a major breakthrough in their investigation: the 17-year-old suspected of organizing the underground “South Australian Fight Club” has been arrested and charged, joining seven other young people who will soon appear in court for their alleged involvement.

    The controversy erupted earlier this month when graphic clips of organised brawls between teenagers began circulating on social media. Filmed in a hidden location in Adelaide’s northern Elizabeth suburbs, the footage revealed a structured, unregulated fighting circuit modeled after professional combat sports. Participants were divided by weight classes, awarded championship belts, and fought under formalised rules, with competitors as young as 13 taking part in the violent, unauthorized matches.

    South Australia Police confirmed on Wednesday that the alleged ringleader, a 17-year-old resident of Davoren Park, was taken into custody at his home earlier this week. He faces 14 total charges: seven counts of aiding and abetting public fighting, and an additional seven counts of publishing material that depicts criminal offences. Following his arrest, the teen was released on bail and is scheduled to make his first appearance at Elizabeth Youth Court on September 4.

    He is not the only young person facing legal consequences for the scheme. Police have confirmed that seven other teenagers have been linked to the fight club and will be summoned to court at a later date. The group of co-accused includes a 14-year-old boy from Elizabeth South, a 14-year-old from Hillier, a 17-year-old from Elizabeth, a 13-year-old girl from Elizabeth Downs, a 15-year-old girl from Paralowie, a 17-year-old from Salisbury, and a 14-year-old from Riverle. The youngest person implicated in the case is the 13-year-old girl, making up two female suspects among the eight total people facing court proceedings.

    When the fight club first came to light, it triggered immediate widespread condemnation from community leaders and the public. South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas previously spoke out against the unregulated brawls, saying he was “absolutely appalled” by the activity. “It is completely unsafe and perpetuates raw violence in a way that cannot be tolerated, particularly among children,” Malinauskas said in the wake of the videos going viral.

    Authorities launched a full investigation after the footage emerged, and have previously confirmed they are working to identify more than 36 additional people suspected of participating in or organizing the fight events. The arrest of the alleged ringleader marks the most significant progress in the case to date, as police continue to untangle the full scope of the underground youth fighting ring.

  • Verdict due in trial over 2018 bridge collapse in Italy that killed dozens

    Verdict due in trial over 2018 bridge collapse in Italy that killed dozens

    GENOA, Italy – Nearly eight years after one of Italy’s deadliest infrastructure disasters killed 43 people, a Genoese courtroom is set to deliver long-awaited verdicts Thursday in the trial of 57 defendants charged over the collapse of Genoa’s Morandi highway bridge. The disaster, which exposed systemic failures in Italy’s national infrastructure upkeep, has remained a raw wound for victims’ families and a national reckoning over public safety standards for years.

    The defendants facing judgement are a broad group that includes former senior executives from Autostrade per L’Italia, Italy’s major highway concession operator, lead engineering experts from the firm’s subsidiary SPEA, and ex-officials from Italy’s national Infrastructure Ministry. Nearly all defendants stand accused of negligent conduct leading to widespread disaster and multiple counts of manslaughter, stemming from allegations that they deliberately neglected mandatory upkeep and safety inspections for the aging bridge, a critical transit link connecting northern Italy to the French Riviera.

    The collapse unfolded on the morning of August 14, 2018, when a 200-meter section of the concrete bridge crumbled during a heavy rainstorm. Dozens of cars and heavy trucks fell more than 40 meters to the ground below, killing all occupants. Graphic footage of the destroyed span spread globally, sending shockwaves across Italy: the collapse occurred on the eve of Ferragosto, Italy’s iconic mid-summer public holiday, when millions of Italians were already traveling for summer vacation, making the disaster a national conversation overnight.

    Lead prosecuting attorneys have argued that decades of deferred maintenance and ignored safety warnings directly caused the structural failure, and have collectively called for nearly 400 years of combined prison sentences for the 57 defendants. All defendants have consistently denied any criminal wrongdoing, asserting that an inherent, unforeseen construction defect from the bridge’s original design was the root cause of the collapse.

    Thursday’s verdicts will bring a close to a sprawling trial that has stretched over four years and included more than 280 separate court hearings, as legal teams sifted through thousands of pages of engineering reports, maintenance records and witness testimony.

    For victims’ legal representatives, the core demand is not just harsh sentences, but formal recognition that the disaster was preventable. “Our expectation is to feel our pain recognized … and to have it acknowledged that this did not happen by chance, but because of serious failures in maintenance,” explained Raffaele Caruso, one of the lead attorneys representing multiple victims’ families.

    When the Morandi Bridge opened to traffic in 1967, it was hailed as a groundbreaking engineering marvel, defined by its three distinctive A-shaped concrete pylons and unique concrete-encased stay cable design. Caruso noted that the trial has already confirmed that warning signs of structural degradation in the pylon that ultimately collapsed were documented as early as the 1990s. Maintenance work to address the same corrosion defect was completed on the bridge’s two other pylons starting in 1993, but work was never scheduled or carried out on the third failed pylon.

    “From 1993 onward, the problem was known. We had three identical pylons. Two had already shown the same defect, and no one seriously asked whether the third one had it as well,” Caruso told reporters ahead of the verdict.

    Ahead of Thursday’s ruling, current Autostrade chief executive Arrigo Giana, who took over the role last year, issued a formal public apology in an open letter published in all major Italian national newspapers Thursday morning. “The actions and decisions of some people left indelible scars,” Giana wrote. “Offering today the apology that was not made then is, for us, a moral imperative that goes beyond establishing legal responsibility and the course of justice toward the truth.”

    Earlier in the legal process, Autostrade and its engineering subsidiary SPEA reached a separate corporate liability settlement with prosecutors. The firms agreed to pay roughly 30 million euros ($34 million) in administrative fines, and implemented sweeping new corporate compliance protocols designed to prevent similar safety failures in the future. All victims and their families have already received full financial compensation through the agreement. In exchange, the companies avoided standing trial as corporate defendants, and escaped far harsher potential penalties that would have included a ban on bidding for future public infrastructure contracts across Italy.

    A replacement span, designed by world-renowned Genoa-born architect Renzo Piano, opened to traffic in 2020. The new bridge was built alongside a permanent public memorial honoring the 43 people killed in the 2018 collapse.

  • Billionaire Judith Neilson’s former secretary hit with new fraud charges

    Billionaire Judith Neilson’s former secretary hit with new fraud charges

    A high-profile fraud case involving one of Australia’s most prominent billionaire philanthropists has taken a new turn, with prosecutors adding 12 fresh criminal charges against the woman accused of stealing $1.6 million from her employer. Annalouise Spence, 51, who served as Judith Neilson’s personal secretary for several years until 2025, now faces a total of 140 charges connected to the alleged misuse of Neilson’s business credit card. The 12 new counts, all formalized in court on Thursday, are additional charges of dishonestly obtaining property through deception.

    Investigators allege that between December 2019 and November 2024, Spence used the company credit card to fund years of unauthorized spending on high-end personal goods and experiences. Among the documented extravagant purchases is a $29,118 trip to Seattle, Washington, which included first-class airfare and concert tickets to see the iconic rock band The Cure. Prosecutors have put the total value of the misappropriated funds at roughly $1.6 million Australian dollars.

    Neilson, a respected figure in Australia’s cultural and philanthropic sectors, is best known for founding the Judith Neilson Foundation, which supports at-risk communities across Australia and sub-Saharan Africa. She also owns two leading contemporary art galleries in Sydney, was appointed a Member of the Order of Australia in 2016 for her contributions to the arts, and holds an honorary doctorate from the University of New South Wales. She is the former wife of prominent Australian investment billionaire Kerr Neilson.

    Spence spent two months in pre-trial detention at Dillwynia Correctional Centre, a maximum-security women’s facility near Sydney, before she was granted bail in mid-June. Her release required a $1 million surety, and strict bail conditions mandate that she remain in a Sydney eastern suburbs mental health facility for ongoing treatment, a arrangement her legal team says will continue for the foreseeable future.

    During Thursday’s court hearing, Spence’s lead barrister Bryan Wrench, a high-profile Sydney legal figure, told the magistrate his team has yet to receive any official evidence brief from prosecutors in the case, despite the investigation dating back to April 2026. In an unusual and pointed observation, Wrench also noted the irony of Spence’s pre-trial detention: Neilson, the alleged victim, is a major donor to a prominent Australian organization that advocates for keeping low-risk women offenders out of prison.

    Wrench requested that Spence be excused from attending the next court hearing, scheduled for August 27, due to her ongoing residential mental health treatment. Magistrate Clare Farnan did not push back on the delay in evidence disclosure, noting that the slow progress in this case was far less problematic than other matters on her court docket that day.

  • Bangkok’s bar fire is the city’s latest deadly blaze – will anything ever change?

    Bangkok’s bar fire is the city’s latest deadly blaze – will anything ever change?

    On a crowded Sunday night in central Bangkok, chaos unfolded inside Rong Beer Na Ladprao pub when a sudden fire erupted. Panicked partygoers rushed toward the venue’s only narrow main exit, their path blocked by thick, toxic smoke that rapidly filled the space. Bodies of those who had already succumbed to smoke inhalation trapped those still alive behind them, turning a manageable small fire into one of Thailand’s deadliest public venue tragedies in recent years. As of the latest update, 32 people have been confirmed dead, matching the grim pattern of two similar catastrophic nightclub fires that shocked the nation over the past 15 years.

    This is not an unprecedented disaster. In 2009, a New Year’s Eve blaze at Bangkok’s Santika Club claimed 67 lives, and four years ago an inferno at Mountain B, a coastal nightclub in Sattahip, killed 26 people. In each case, experts issued urgent warnings after the tragedy, calling for sweeping safety reforms to prevent identical losses. Now, Worsak Kanok-Nukulchai, a leading expert from the Asian Institute of Technology who called for change after the Mountain B fire, is forced to repeat the same warnings.

    Professor Worsak notes that despite differences in location, timing, and initial cause, all three disasters follow an identical deadly template: multiple fatalities in overcrowded indoor venues, rapid fire spread through ceiling or stage structures, thick smoke that eliminates visibility and blocks access to exits, and most deaths caused by toxic smoke inhalation rather than direct burns. For the recent Rong Beer Na Ladprao fire, he says preliminary evidence points to an electrical fault as the likely ignition source, with fire spreading rapidly through flammable acoustic sound insulation installed inside the venue.

    The dramatic bursts of flame seen roaring out of the front entrance, he explains, were likely fueled by fresh oxygen rushing in once the door was opened by fleeing guests. The intense heat and fire at the main entrance drove many patrons to the back of the pub, where two secondary exits were reportedly partially blocked and became impossible to locate once the fire cut power to the building. Most of the victims’ bodies were recovered from this rear area.

    In the wake of the 2009 Santika Club disaster, Thai authorities introduced sweeping updates to nightclub safety regulations. Starting in 2012, venues were required to use fire-resistant materials for sound insulation, install wider outward-opening exits, maintain backup power for illuminated exit signs, and fit sprinkler systems in any space holding more than 500 guests. However, a critical regulatory loophole leaves most of Thailand’s entertainment venues unprotected by these rules: the stricter standards only apply to establishments located in officially designated entertainment zones.

    Bangkok has just three official entertainment zones, meaning the vast majority of pubs and clubs across the city are registered as “restaurants with live music” to avoid the stricter safety requirements. Both Rong Beer Na Ladprao and Mountain B fell into this unregulated category. The loophole, which has now been linked to more than 50 deaths, has been formally acknowledged by Bangkok Governor Chadchart Sittipunt, who revealed the Rong Beer Na Ladprao pub was inspected and declared safe just three months before the fire.

    In response to the tragedy, Governor Chadchart has ordered city officials to begin unannounced random safety inspections of all venues classified as restaurants that operate as de facto pubs or clubs. “From now we will apply the stricter standards to venues like these,” he stated during a recent press briefing. “Even if we do not have full legal powers we will make suggestions. If they don’t follow these, we will try to find ways to stop them from operating. We must be able to shut them down if there’s a risk.”

    Yet serious questions remain about whether the city can follow through on this pledge. There are thousands of unregulated entertainment venues operating across Bangkok, and it remains unclear if the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration has enough trained staff to carry out widespread unannounced inspections. Industry analysts also expect fierce pushback from venue owners if authorities move to close large numbers of non-compliant establishments.

    Compounding these challenges is Thailand’s long-standing open secret of widespread corruption among local officials and police. It is common practice for unregulated entertainment venues to make regular off-the-books payments to law enforcement and inspectors to overlook safety violations. Even if new rules are introduced, experts doubt they will be consistently enforced. This pattern of impunity has played out after previous disasters: after the Mountain B fire, five police officers were suspended on suspicion of turning a blind eye to the venue’s unregulated status, but no further action has been taken against them. The venue owner and three other staff were convicted of safety violations and sentenced to up to 10 years in prison, but they remain free on bail during an appeals process that can take years to resolve in Thailand’s overloaded court system. In the 2009 Santika Club case, the owner and the event organizer convicted of starting the fire remained free on appeal for six years before their sentences were upheld by the Supreme Court, and no public officials have ever been prosecuted for their role in the tragedy.

    This repeated cycle of tragedy, official promises, and little meaningful change extends far beyond public venue safety. Thailand suffers from systemic safety failures across multiple sectors: road fatalities per capita are 10 times higher than in the United Kingdom. In October 2024, a bus fire caused by illegally installed gas canisters killed 23 people, 20 of whom were schoolchildren. Earlier this year, 32 passengers died when an improperly secured construction crane collapsed onto a passing passenger train, and just weeks before the Bangkok pub fire, 10 Buddhist monks were killed by a pickup truck driven by an 11-year-old boy. Every one of these incidents was followed by pledges of reform, yet preventable deaths continue to occur at alarming rates.

  • Idaho mother charged with children’s murder must stay in jail, judge rules

    Idaho mother charged with children’s murder must stay in jail, judge rules

    A 23-year-old Idaho mother accused of murdering her 18-month-old twin sons will remain behind bars after a judge revoked her bail earlier this week, in a high-profile case that has intersected with national anti-vaccine rhetoric. Andrea Shaw, charged with two counts of second-degree murder in the May 2025 deaths of her toddlers Dallas and Tyson, has maintained that the children’s fatal health decline stemmed from routine childhood vaccinations. She has not yet entered a formal plea in the case.

    Shaw’s legal team had petitioned the court to cut her original $2 million bail to just $100,000, arguing that she needed to be released to care for her newborn child, born only days before her arrest in the case. Her attorney, Joseph Filicetti, also noted that Shaw had recently undergone a cesarean section and required recovery time while nursing her infant, framing her as a loving mother who posed no risk to the new baby. The BBC has reached out to Filicetti for additional comment beyond his statements to U.S. media outlets.

    Prosecutors in Payette County pushed back aggressively against the bail reduction request, urging the judge to revoke bond entirely. They argued that Shaw should not be granted any form of release that would put her in proximity to children, including her own newborn. “This is not a vaccine case,” one lead prosecutor stated bluntly. “This is a case where a mother unfortunately has killed her two children.” Prosecutors allege that Shaw suffocated the twins, who were found dead in their cribs at the family’s home.

    The judge ultimately sided with the prosecution, agreeing that Shaw poses a clear threat to her youngest child and revoking bond entirely.

    The case has drawn heightened attention due to Shaw’s ties to Children’s Health Defense, a prominent anti-vaccine organization founded by current U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Months after the twins’ deaths in 2025, Shaw and her husband gave an interview to the group laying out their claim that vaccines caused the children’s deaths. Shaw told the group that the toddlers became ill eight days after receiving routine vaccinations for hepatitis A, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and influenza. She said she sought medical care after they developed symptoms, and that clinicians told her the illness could be a vaccine reaction; the children were prescribed pain medication but died two days later.

    Shaw has claimed that law enforcement immediately pinned blame on her rather than accepting a vaccine-related cause, while investigators say her arrest followed a months-long, exhaustive investigation into the deaths. Full autopsy results from the investigation have not yet been made public.

    Shaw is also a named plaintiff in a lawsuit led by Children’s Health Defense against the American Academy of Pediatrics, challenging the organization’s long-standing childhood vaccination recommendations. Mainstream public health experts and practicing clinicians have repeatedly reaffirmed the well-documented safety of routine childhood vaccines. While minor side effects are possible after vaccination, severe adverse outcomes are extremely rare, and vaccines are credited with preventing millions of life-threatening illnesses globally each year.

  • NYC’s Rikers Island jail hosts World Cup watch party for inmates

    NYC’s Rikers Island jail hosts World Cup watch party for inmates

    NEW YORK – From downtown office break rooms to waterfront public parks and neighborhood sports bars, soccer fans across the city packed viewing gatherings for Wednesday’s World Cup semifinal between England and Argentina. But one watch party unfolded in a location few would expect to host such a communal, lighthearted event: Rikers Island, New York City’s sprawling, controversial correctional complex long plagued by headlines of overcrowding, mismanagement, and systemic failing.

    On this Wednesday afternoon, more than 100 incarcerated people, clad in standard tan correctional uniforms, filled rows of tables facing a large projection screen set up in the main intake center’s gymnasium. Colorful balloon towers, capped with soccer-ball-shaped balloons, framed the screen, transforming the utilitarian space into a makeshift fan zone for the high-stakes match.

    The jail system first launched these organized watch parties when the World Cup tournament kicked off last month, opening access only to incarcerated people who have maintained good behavior, requiring a minimum of 30 days incident-free to participate. The program has already brought more than 90 fan gatherings to the facility, drawing roughly 4,500 participants out of Rikers’ current population of approximately 6,600 incarcerated people.

    Shortly before kickoff, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani arrived to join the event. Ditching his signature dark formal suit jacket, the Democratic mayor rolled up the sleeves of his white dress shirt, took a seat at one of the front tables, and dove straight into casual conversation about the tournament with the incarcerated guests.

    One participant at the mayor’s table shared his prediction: he expected Argentina to defeat England, then go on to face Spain in the final, after Spain’s upset win over France in the earlier semifinal. “You never know,” Mamdani responded, noting he was a vocal supporter of Morocco, which had been eliminated in an earlier round of competition.

    At a neighboring table, another incarcerated person told the mayor he was scheduled to be released from custody later that same day. Mamdani congratulated him warmly, shaking his hand and patting him on the back, saying “That’s amazing.”

    Roughly 20 minutes into the match, the mayor departed the gathering, leaving the crowd of incarcerated fans to enjoy the rest of the game in the transformed gym space. The unusual program marks a rare effort to bring recreational, community-focused activities to a facility that has long been the center of criticism over poor conditions and lack of programming for incarcerated people.