分类: politics

  • Venezuelans wonder who’s in charge as Trump claims contact with Maduro’s deputy

    Venezuelans wonder who’s in charge as Trump claims contact with Maduro’s deputy

    BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) — Venezuela has been plunged into a profound constitutional crisis following the dramatic capture of President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. military forces. The operation has triggered urgent questions about legitimate leadership and the nation’s political future, creating widespread uncertainty among citizens and officials alike.

    In a stunning development, former U.S. President Donald Trump unexpectedly endorsed Maduro’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, as a potential successor despite her history of facing U.S. sanctions for undermining Venezuelan democracy. Trump revealed that Rodríguez had engaged in extensive discussions with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, during which she allegedly expressed willingness to cooperate with American objectives.

    “She’s essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again,” Trump told reporters, simultaneously dismissing opposition leader Maria Corina Machado—the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize laureate—as lacking sufficient support to govern effectively.

    Rodríguez responded to these developments with defiant rhetoric on state television, demanding Maduro’s immediate release and condemning the U.S. operation as a flagrant violation of international law. Flanked by senior civilian officials and military commanders, she emphatically declared: “There is only one president in this country, and his name is Nicolás Maduro.”

    The situation remains highly fluid with no visible U.S. administration presence in Venezuela. Constitutional provisions requiring a new election within thirty days of presidential absence now face extraordinary complications due to the military intervention and questions about the government’s legitimacy.

    Venezuelan military leaders projected unwavering defiance, with Defense Minister Gen. Vladimir Padrino López asserting “They have attacked us but will not break us.” Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello appeared in combat gear, urging citizens to defend national sovereignty against what he characterized as “rats” who would “regret what they did.”

    Rodríguez’s complex profile includes strong connections to Wall Street and Republican oil interests, having previously engaged with figures including Blackwater founder Erik Prince and Trump special envoy Richard Grenell. Unlike many Maduro associates facing U.S. criminal indictments, Rodríguez and her brother Jorge—who leads the Maduro-controlled National Assembly—have avoided legal prosecution while maintaining leftist credentials rooted in their father’s tragic death in police custody during the 1970s.

    The opposition movement, led by Machado, maintains that retired diplomat Edmundo González—widely believed to have won the disputed 2024 presidential election—should immediately assume constitutional authority. Machado pledged to restore order, free political prisoners, and reclaim democratic governance, asserting readiness to “assert our mandate and take power.”

    With military forces traditionally serving as Venezuela’s ultimate political arbiter, Rodríguez faces significant challenges in consolidating authority. Experts emphasize that the resolution will depend heavily on the current state of military capabilities and which officials were detained during the operation.

    Venezuelan citizens expressed widespread shock and confusion, with many speculating on social media about possible mistaken identity in Trump’s comments regarding the two prominent female political figures.

  • Pets, planes and a ‘fortress’: inside Trump’s raid on Maduro

    Pets, planes and a ‘fortress’: inside Trump’s raid on Maduro

    In a meticulously orchestrated covert operation spanning several months, US forces successfully captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro in a dramatic nighttime raid that culminated years of escalating tensions between Washington and Caracas. Codenamed “Operation Absolute Resolve,” the mission unfolded with surgical precision, combining advanced surveillance, military might, and strategic deception.

    US intelligence agencies had maintained constant surveillance on Maduro since August, meticulously tracking his movements, dietary habits, and even his pets. According to Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine, American operatives built an intricate profile of the Venezuelan leader’s routines despite his efforts to frequently change locations as tensions with Washington mounted.

    The military operation involved months of precise planning, including the construction of a replica house identical to Maduro’s residence for training purposes. By early December, US forces stood ready, awaiting optimal conditions including favorable weather patterns. President Trump revealed he initially ordered the mission four days prior to execution but delayed for perfect operational circumstances.

    At 10:46 pm Washington time on Friday, President Trump gave the final authorization, offering the troops “Good luck and Godspeed” before more than 150 military aircraft launched from both land and sea bases. The mission core involved helicopters flying at merely 100 feet above ocean surface, supported by fighter jets providing air cover while US satellite and cyber capabilities disabled Venezuelan radar systems.

    The operation reached its climax as explosions rocked Caracas just before 2 am local time, with US forces specifically targeting Venezuelan air defenses to enable the extraction team’s approach. President Trump monitored the entire operation via live feed from a makeshift situation room at his Mar-a-Lago resort, accompanied by top administration officials including Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and CIA director John Ratcliffe.

    Describing Maduro’s compound as “a fortress” with steel doors and security rooms, Trump noted that specialized equipment including massive blowtorches had been prepared though ultimately proved unnecessary. The Venezuelan leader and his wife surrendered without significant resistance and were taken into custody facing US drugs and terrorism charges. Both were transported to the USS Iwo Jima by 3:29 am, with President Trump announcing the successful operation on Truth Social at 4:21 am Washington time.

    The first visual confirmation of Maduro’s capture emerged through Trump’s social media channels, showing the former leader blindfolded, handcuffed, wearing ear protectors and a Nike tracksuit—a stark image marking the conclusion of one of the most sophisticated special operations in recent history.

  • Israel’s opposition leader urges Iran to ‘pay close attention’ to Venezuela

    Israel’s opposition leader urges Iran to ‘pay close attention’ to Venezuela

    In a significant escalation of diplomatic rhetoric, Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid issued a stark warning to Iranian leadership, urging them to “pay close attention to what is happening in Venezuela.” This statement, delivered via social media platform X, appeared to reference the recent U.S. military operation that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.

    The comments emerged amidst widespread international condemnation of the United States’ intervention in the oil-rich South American nation, with numerous global officials decrying the action as a violation of international law. Iran, a key ally of Venezuela, was among the first nations to condemn the U.S. operation, characterizing it as a “flagrant violation of Venezuela’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

    The Iranian foreign ministry released an official statement asserting that “the US military attack on Venezuela constitutes a clear violation of the fundamental principles of the United Nations Charter and the basic rules of international law.” The ministry further warned that American military aggression could trigger global consequences, emphasizing Venezuela’s “inherent right to defend its national sovereignty, territorial integrity, and right to self-determination.”

    In contrast to the international criticism, Israel expressed support for Maduro’s removal. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar stated on X: “Israel welcomes the removal of the dictator who led a network of drugs and terror and hopes for the return of democracy to the country and for friendly relations between the states.”

    The geopolitical tensions escalated further when former U.S. President Donald Trump threatened potential intervention in Iran amid domestic protests, declaring: “If Iran shoots and violently kills peaceful protesters, which is their custom, the United States of America will come to their rescue. We are locked and loaded and ready to go.”

    Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary Ali Larijani responded with a warning that U.S. intervention “corresponds to chaos in the entire region and the destruction of US interests,” likely referencing Iranian capabilities to target American military bases in the region.

    Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, following meetings with Trump, publicly advocated for renewed military action against Iran, accusing Tehran of “exporting terrorism not only to every part of the Middle East, but to Venezuela” and alleging Iranian collaboration with the Maduro regime.

  • Trump takes huge political gamble in Venezuela regime change

    Trump takes huge political gamble in Venezuela regime change

    President Donald Trump’s administration finds itself navigating treacherous political waters following a high-stakes military operation in Venezuela that successfully captured leader Nicholas Maduro. The daring special forces mission, involving helicopter deployments, aerial bombardments, and naval support, concluded without American casualties—a tactical victory that nonetheless ignited immediate controversy across the U.S. political spectrum.

    The operation represents a striking departure from Trump’s longstanding isolationist rhetoric. For years, the president championed his ‘America First’ doctrine, criticizing foreign entanglements and famously denouncing the Iraq invasion as “a stupid thing.” This ideological foundation of his MAGA movement now faces its most significant test as the administration justifies intervention in Venezuela.

    Democratic leaders launched swift condemnations, with Senator Chuck Schumer labeling the mission “reckless” and Iraq veteran Senator Ruben Gallego declaring it “illegal.” Meanwhile, Trump’s Republican allies mounted a vigorous defense. House Speaker Mike Johnson called the action “decisive and justified,” while Senator Tom Cotton praised the president and military personnel for the “incredible operation.”

    Yet beneath surface unity, cracks appear within Trump’s base. Conservative Senator Mike Lee initially questioned the constitutional justification before being reassured the operation merely executed an arrest warrant. More significantly, MAGA firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene delivered a scathing critique, challenging the administration’s narcotics trafficking justification and drawing uncomfortable parallels between Venezuelan regime change and Russian or Chinese aggression. Her conclusion—”Boy were we wrong”—signals potential disillusionment among Trump’s core supporters who believed they voted to end foreign interventions.

    The administration now confronts complex questions about legal authority, strategic consistency, and political fallout that may reverberate through the upcoming election cycle.

  • Yemen presidency says Saudi-backed forces retake key province

    Yemen presidency says Saudi-backed forces retake key province

    In a significant escalation of intra-coalition tensions, Saudi-backed forces have successfully reclaimed control over Yemen’s resource-rich Hadramawt province following intense military confrontations with UAE-supported separatists. The operation, which commenced on Friday, marks a dramatic reversal in the ongoing power struggle between Gulf allies whose competing interests have fractured Yemen’s anti-Houthi alliance.

    Rashad al-Alimi, head of Yemen’s Presidential Leadership Council, confirmed that National Shield forces achieved ‘record success’ in retaking all military and security positions throughout the strategic border province. The development comes just months after the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council (STC) had captured the region, creating a direct confrontation between the oil-rich Gulf powers.

    Military officials reported that neighboring Mahra province similarly switched allegiance back to Saudi-backed forces without resistance, with separatist flags being replaced by Yemeni national banners. The transition occurred amid intensified Saudi airstrikes targeting STC positions, including a Friday attack on Al-Khasha military camp that resulted in 20 casualties according to separatist sources.

    Eyewitness accounts from Mukalla described security breakdowns and looting as STC forces retreated, with residents observing military vehicles transporting household appliances amid the withdrawal. Satellite imagery and local reports confirmed Saudi warplanes conducted intensive strikes on STC camps at Barshid, though exact casualty figures remain unverified.

    Diplomatic efforts intensified simultaneously, with Saudi Arabia issuing calls for a conference in Riyadh to unite southern factions. The foreign ministry emphasized the need for ‘just solutions to the southern cause’ through dialogue. Both the STC and UAE subsequently expressed willingness to engage in talks, while Egypt, Qatar, Kuwait, and Bahrain voiced support for negotiated settlements that preserve Yemen’s territorial integrity.

    The developments occur against the STC’s announced two-year transitional plan toward potential independence, including proposed referendums and dialogue with northern Houthi rebels. STC president Aidaros Alzubidi warned that immediate independence declarations would follow if southern Yemen faced further attacks or dialogue failed.

    This military realignment underscores the complex fragmentation of Yemen’s conflict, where the Saudi-led coalition continues battling Houthi rebels in the north while its constituent members fight proxy wars in the south, complicating peace efforts after nearly a decade of civil war.

  • Ukraine’s allies in Kyiv for talks on plan to end war

    Ukraine’s allies in Kyiv for talks on plan to end war

    Senior security officials from fifteen nations, including key European powers and international bodies, convened in Kyiv this Saturday for high-stakes discussions on a United States-mediated strategy to terminate the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war. The assembly marks the inaugural diplomatic gathering of the new year, with participants from Britain, France, Germany, NATO, and the European Union in attendance.

    The dialogue, which Ukrainian Chief Negotiator Rustem Umerov detailed via Telegram, centered on foundational documents outlining potential security guarantees and methodologies for implementing a peace formula. A subsequent European leadership summit is anticipated in France early next week to advance these multilateral efforts.

    These intensified diplomatic initiatives unfold against a backdrop of persistent military aggression. Recent days have witnessed lethal strikes in multiple regions, including Kharkiv and Kherson, resulting in civilian casualties. Moscow and Kyiv remain fundamentally divided over territorial sovereignty, with Russia currently occupying approximately twenty percent of Ukraine’s landmass and insisting on complete dominion over the eastern Donbas region as a non-negotiable condition for any settlement.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky issued a firm declaration during a Saturday press briefing, emphasizing that absent a diplomatic breakthrough compelling Russian withdrawal, Ukraine would steadfastly continue its defensive campaign. He explicitly rejected any agreement that would compromise territorial integrity or fail to establish durable deterrence against future invasions.

    The geopolitical landscape is further complicated by parallel international crises, notably a large-scale U.S. military engagement in Venezuela, which diverted some attention from the proceedings. Meanwhile, President Zelensky has initiated significant restructuring within Ukraine’s leadership and regional governance, signaling a strategic consolidation as the conflict extends into another year of devastating warfare.

  • Capture of Maduro and US claim it will run Venezuela raise new legal questions

    Capture of Maduro and US claim it will run Venezuela raise new legal questions

    The Trump administration’s dramatic seizure of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has ignited fierce debate among legal scholars and policymakers regarding the legality of aggressive U.S. actions in South America. Maduro was captured during a midnight operation involving U.S. forces in Caracas and transported via warship to face narcoterrorism conspiracy charges in New York—an extraordinary maneuver that legal experts characterize as historically unprecedented.

    This development represents the culmination of months of escalating military engagement in the region, including 35 documented boat strikes against alleged drug trafficking vessels resulting in over 115 fatalities since September, alongside multiple seizures of Venezuelan oil tankers. According to former Navy attorney Mark Nevitt, now at Emory University School of Law, the operation lacks any recognizable legal foundation absent an existing extradition treaty.

    The administration’s justification hinges on a controversial memorandum obtained by The Associated Press in October, which designates Venezuelan drug cartels as unlawful combatants and frames drug trafficking as an armed conflict requiring military response. This novel interpretation significantly expands presidential war powers without congressional authorization—a constitutional concern compounded by the fact that lawmakers from both parties have grown increasingly uneasy about military actions in Venezuela.

    Historical parallels to the 1989 Panama invasion and capture of Manuel Noriega reveal critical distinctions: unlike Panama, where U.S. national security interests were directly threatened by control of the Panama Canal and safety of American citizens, no similar justification exists for Venezuela. While federal courts traditionally defer to executive authority on national security matters, Notre Dame Law School professor Jimmy Gurule emphasizes that “great deference does not mean absolute deference and unfettered authority to do anything.”

    Congressional leaders were notified only after operations commenced, prompting bipartisan calls for greater oversight. The Senate prepares to vote on a war powers resolution that would restrict military action against Venezuela without legislative approval. Democratic lawmakers warn that bypassing international law sets dangerous precedents that authoritarian regimes could exploit, potentially undermining global stability and America’s moral authority.

    As Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged the impossibility of pre-operation consultations due to its sensitive nature, the administration faces mounting scrutiny over its legal rationale and long-term strategic implications for international relations and constitutional balance of powers.

  • Iran strongly condemns US attack on Venezuela

    Iran strongly condemns US attack on Venezuela

    TEHRAN – Iran’s Foreign Ministry issued a forceful condemnation on Saturday against United States military operations targeting Venezuela, characterizing the actions as an egregious violation of Venezuela’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity.

    In an official statement released through government channels, Iranian officials labeled the offensive as an unwarranted act of aggression that fundamentally contravenes established principles within the United Nations Charter and established international legal frameworks that prohibit the use of military force against sovereign nations.

    The condemnation follows confirmation from U.S. President Donald Trump via his Truth Social platform that American forces had conducted extensive strikes against Venezuelan targets, resulting in the apprehension and extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his spouse from the country.

    Iran’s diplomatic corps emphatically reaffirmed Venezuela’s legitimate right to defend its national interests and exercise self-determination, simultaneously calling upon the global community to execute its legal and ethical obligations by immediately terminating what Iranian authorities characterized as an American-led invasion operation.

    This diplomatic confrontation emerges amidst escalating tensions between Tehran and Washington. The previous day, Iranian leadership had declared it would vehemently resist any foreign interference in its domestic affairs, responding to President Trump’s warnings that the U.S. would intervene if Iran took action against peaceful demonstrators.

    Current civil unrest in multiple Iranian cities, triggered by the dramatic devaluation of the national currency, has further complicated the geopolitical landscape between the two nations.

  • US attacks Venezuela: Vice President asks for ‘proof of life’ as Maduro captured

    US attacks Venezuela: Vice President asks for ‘proof of life’ as Maduro captured

    Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez has officially confirmed the occurrence of significant diplomatic engagements between representatives of the Venezuelan government and officials from the United States. The discussions, described as taking place through established diplomatic channels, mark a notable development in the complex and often strained bilateral relationship.

    Rodríguez characterized the dialogue as ‘respectful’ and conducted within a framework of mutual recognition, suggesting a potential thaw in relations. The talks are understood to have covered a broad agenda concerning the future of diplomatic interactions between the two nations. This confirmation provides an official Venezuelan perspective on communications that have been the subject of international speculation.

    The context for these discussions is a multifaceted political and economic situation within Venezuela, compounded by years of international sanctions led primarily by the U.S. The outcome of such high-level contact is being closely monitored by regional observers and global markets, given Venezuela’s status as a major oil producer. The dialogue potentially signals a strategic shift towards re-evaluating longstanding foreign policy positions on both sides, with possible implications for energy security and regional geopolitics.

  • Trump on Venezuela: ‘We are going to run the country’

    Trump on Venezuela: ‘We are going to run the country’

    In a significant foreign policy statement, President Donald Trump has asserted that the United States will assume administrative control over Venezuela until what he termed a ‘proper transition’ of power can be implemented. The declaration represents an unprecedented escalation in Washington’s approach to the ongoing political crisis in the South American nation, where opposition leader Juan Guaidó and incumbent President Nicolás Maduro both claim legitimate authority. This pronouncement signals a potential shift from diplomatic and economic pressure toward more direct involvement in Venezuelan governance. The Trump administration has consistently supported Guaidó’s interim government while applying crippling sanctions against Maduro’s regime, which it considers illegitimate. This latest development raises profound questions about sovereignty, international law, and the future of U.S. interventionist policy in Latin America, potentially setting a new precedent for how global powers address internal political conflicts in other nations.