分类: politics

  • Is Bangladesh’s youth turning against India?

    Is Bangladesh’s youth turning against India?

    The political landscape of Bangladesh is undergoing a profound transformation as anti-Indian sentiment reaches unprecedented levels following the ouster of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. The walls of Dhaka University now bear witness to this shift, adorned with graffiti proclaiming ‘Dhaka, not Delhi’—a slogan that has even been stitched onto traditional saris, symbolizing the deep-seated resentment against perceived Indian hegemony.

    This dramatic deterioration in bilateral relations marks a stark contrast to the previously touted model of neighborhood diplomacy. The crisis stems from India’s decision to grant asylum to the deposed leader Sheikh Hasina, who fled to Delhi after her resignation amid the July 2024 uprising that claimed approximately 1,400 lives according to UN estimates. India’s refusal to extradite Hasina to face an in absentia death sentence for her government’s brutal security crackdown has become a focal point of public outrage.

    Analysts identify multiple layers to this diplomatic rupture. The younger generation, particularly students who led the pro-democracy movement, accuse India of enabling Bangladesh’s democratic erosion by consistently endorsing disputed elections in 2014, 2018, and 2024. ‘People think the destruction of democracy was supported by India,’ states Mosharraf Hossain, a 24-year-old sociology student, echoing a widespread sentiment.

    Long-standing grievances have converged into a perfect storm of anti-Indianism: border killings, water-sharing disputes, trade restrictions, and inflammatory rhetoric from Indian politicians have created a perception that India views Bangladesh as ‘a pliant backyard’ rather than a sovereign equal. The recent suspension of most visa services and cultural retaliation—including calls to boycott Indian goods and suspension of IPL broadcasts—demonstrate how political strain is spilling into economic and cultural spheres.

    Despite tactical diplomatic outreach by India, including Foreign Minister S Jaishankar’s engagement with opposition figures like BNP’s Tarique Rahman and unprecedented contacts with Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami, these efforts have failed to arrest the relationship’s decline. Kamal Ahmed, consulting editor of The Daily Star, confirms this is ‘the lowest point of the bilateral relationship’ in decades.

    The upcoming February 12 election represents a critical juncture. With Hasina’s Awami League barred from contesting, the political landscape is realigning, though all parties recognize that resetting relations with India is unavoidable. As academic Ali Riaz notes, ‘The burden of repair lies largely with Delhi’ and requires moving beyond managing Dhaka through favored intermediaries. While geography, history, and shared cultural heritage make complete separation impossible, rebuilding trust will require India to align its policy with the aspirations of Bangladeshi citizens rather than governmental preferences.

  • ‘Trump’s psyche’: The aide driving president’s most controversial policies

    ‘Trump’s psyche’: The aide driving president’s most controversial policies

    Stephen Miller, the controversial architect of Donald Trump’s immigration policy, finds himself at the center of a political firestorm as the administration’s hardline tactics face growing public backlash. The deputy chief of staff and homeland security adviser, once a behind-the-scenes operator, now occupies an uncomfortable position in the national spotlight following several controversial incidents.

    The escalation began when Miller aggressively defended federal immigration officers involved in the fatal shooting of Minneapolis nurse Alex Pretti, initially labeling the victim a ‘domestic terrorist’ on social media. This characterization collapsed when video evidence revealed Pretti posed no threat to officers before being pepper-sprayed and shot ten times. Miller subsequently walked back his statements, claiming the administration’s initial assessment relied on field reports from agents who ‘may not have been following’ proper protocol.

    This incident exemplifies the combative approach that has made Miller both indispensable to Trump and reviled by Democrats. His influence extends beyond immigration to shaping America’s assertive stance across the Western Hemisphere. Miller played a central role in planning military operations against Houthi rebels in Yemen and oversaw narcotics interdiction missions in the Caribbean that ultimately expanded into the operation that removed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from power.

    Despite his expanding portfolio, Miller’s immigration policies have become increasingly contentious. After demanding immigration officials target 3,000 arrests daily—a dramatic increase from previous enforcement levels—the administration intensified operations in multiple cities including Washington DC, Chicago, and Minneapolis. These actions have triggered a decline in public support, with recent polls showing approval of Trump’s immigration policy at just 39%, its lowest level since he returned to office.

    Miller’s worldview combines uncompromising immigration enforcement with a vision of American power that frequently clashes with traditional diplomatic norms. His recent comments questioning Denmark’s sovereignty over Greenland and asserting that world affairs are ‘governed by strength, governed by force, governed by power’ alarmed even some Republican allies. North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis remarked that Miller should ‘get into a lane where he knows what he’s talking about or get out of this job.’

    Yet Miller’s position appears secure due to his unwavering loyalty to Trump. Having stood by the president through electoral defeat, the Capitol attack, and political exile, Miller understands Trump’s psyche like few others. As conservative strategist Bryan Lanza notes: ‘Stephen Miller is critical to Trump’s psyche. Always go strong; never back down. He can always count on Stephen to support that position on any issue.’

    With midterm elections approaching, Miller’s policies face their ultimate test at the ballot box. As Lanza observes: ‘We’ll know in November whether he’s to blame for it. The voters, at the end of the day, can be very unforgiving.’ Regardless of the outcome, Miller’s influence on American immigration policy and hemispheric relations will likely endure long after the current administration.

  • Japan’s ‘Iron Lady’ Takaichi forges stunning election win

    Japan’s ‘Iron Lady’ Takaichi forges stunning election win

    In a historic winter election marked by record snowfall, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has secured a commanding parliamentary majority, positioning her conservative government to implement controversial economic reforms and military expansion policies. Official projections from public broadcaster NHK indicate Takaichi’s Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and its coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party (Ishin), captured a supermajority of 328 seats in the 465-member lower house.

    The 64-year-old leader, frequently compared to Britain’s Margaret Thatcher for her staunch conservative stance, called the rare February election to capitalize on her substantial personal popularity since assuming leadership of the long-ruling LDP late last year. Voters braved severe winter conditions, with some polling stations closing early due to unprecedented snowfall, demonstrating significant public engagement with Takaichi’s policy platform.

    Her victory signals a dramatic political turnaround for the LDP, which had lost control of both parliamentary chambers under previous leadership. Political analysts attribute her success to an effective social media strategy and resonance with younger voters, sparking what has been termed ‘sanakatsu’ or ‘Sanae-mania’ across Japan.

    The Prime Minister’s agenda includes suspending the 8% sales tax on food items to address rising living costs—a measure that has unsettled financial markets concerned about Japan’s substantial public debt. Simultaneously, Takaichi has pledged to strengthen military capabilities amid growing regional tensions, particularly regarding Taiwan, which has significantly strained relations with China.

    International responses have been notably divided. U.S. President Donald Trump offered his ‘total endorsement’ and extended an invitation for a White House meeting next month. Conversely, Beijing has expressed strong opposition to Takaichi’s national security posture, implementing economic countermeasures including travel advisories against Japan. Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi emphasized the government’s intention to pursue dialogue with China while advancing defense enhancement policies.

    Business leaders have welcomed the election outcome as restoring political stability, with Keidanren head Yoshinobu Tsutsui noting Japan’s economy stands at ‘a critical juncture for achieving sustainable and strong growth.’ The decisive victory provides Takaichi with a strong mandate to pursue her dual agenda of economic stimulus and security reinforcement, though implementation challenges remain regarding fiscal sustainability and diplomatic relations.

  • Venezuela frees high-profile opposition figure Juan Pablo Guanipa

    Venezuela frees high-profile opposition figure Juan Pablo Guanipa

    Venezuelan authorities have released prominent opposition figure Juan Pablo Guanipa after eight months in detention, marking a significant development in the country’s ongoing political tensions. Guanipa, a key ally of opposition leader María Corina Machado and former vice-president of the National Assembly, was detained in May 2025 on charges of terrorism and treason following his challenge of the disputed 2024 presidential election results.

    The release comes amid a gradual prisoner liberation process initiated by Venezuela’s interim government following the January capture of President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. authorities. Maduro currently faces drug trafficking charges in New York courts.

    Guanipa’s son, Ramón Guanipa, confirmed the development through social media, expressing both relief and continued concern. “Our entire family will be able to hug again soon,” he wrote, while cautioning that “hundreds of Venezuelans remain unjustly imprisoned.”

    According to Foro Penal, a Venezuelan organization providing assistance to political prisoners, nearly 400 detainees have been released since the interim government’s January 8 promise to free “a significant number” of prisoners. The organization’s president, Alfredo Romero, confirmed at least 30 individuals were freed on Sunday alone, including Guanipa and other notable figures such as Perkins Rocha, Jesús Armas, and Luis Tarbay.

    The release of political prisoners was among the key demands made by U.S. President Donald Trump, who described such actions as “a very important and smart gesture” from Venezuelan authorities. Despite these developments, the interim government has proceeded cautiously, releasing detainees in small groups rather than implementing mass liberations.

    Guanipa’s political history includes his election as governor of the Zulia region, though he was barred from assuming office after refusing to swear an oath before Maduro’s National Constituent Assembly. His detention in May 2025 followed what opposition leader Machado characterized as “an act of state terrorism,” with security forces tracking him down while he was in hiding.

    The release represents ongoing negotiations between Venezuelan political factions and international stakeholders, though many remain skeptical about the interim government’s commitment to comprehensive reform.

  • Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai faces sentencing in landmark national security case

    Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai faces sentencing in landmark national security case

    Hong Kong’s High Court is poised to deliver sentencing on Monday for Jimmy Lai, the former media proprietor and prominent Beijing critic, in a watershed case under the national security legislation imposed by China. The 78-year-old democracy advocate, convicted in December by three state-approved judges, faces potential life imprisonment for conspiring with foreign forces and publishing seditious materials through his now-defunct Apple Daily newspaper.

    The prosecution successfully argued that Lai orchestrated systematic campaigns requesting international sanctions against Chinese and Hong Kong authorities, utilizing his media platform as a facade for activities deemed threatening to national security. Despite Lai’s vigorous 52-day testimony maintaining his innocence and denying calls for foreign sanctions, the judiciary determined he consistently pursued the destabilization of China’s governing Communist Party.

    This case has ignited international condemnation from Western governments, with both the United States and United Kingdom formally requesting Lai’s release. The British citizen’s deteriorating health conditions—including cardiovascular issues and diabetes—have added complexity to the proceedings, though prison authorities maintain his medical status remains stable.

    Parallel to Lai’s sentencing, several former Apple Daily staff members and activists who entered guilty pleas are anticipated to receive reduced penalties after cooperating with prosecutors. The 2021 closure of Apple Daily following asset freezes and arrests marked a dramatic turning point for Hong Kong’s media landscape, which has plummeted in global press freedom rankings from 18th position in 2002 to 140th currently.

    Legal scholars note the case establishes concerning precedents regarding the interpretation of ‘seditious intent’ and ‘foreign collusion,’ potentially criminalizing standard journalistic practices involving international engagement. The verdict arrives days before Lunar New Year celebrations, with supporters hoping for family reunifications despite the expected lengthy prison terms.

  • Centre-left candidate poised to comfortably win Portuguese presidency

    Centre-left candidate poised to comfortably win Portuguese presidency

    Portugal has delivered a decisive rejection of far-right politics with centre-left candidate António José Seguro securing a commanding victory in the presidential runoff election. With 95% of ballots counted, official results show Seguro capturing 66% of the vote, soundly defeating his far-right opponent André Ventura who garnered just 34%.

    The election occurred against the backdrop of severe weather emergencies as Storm Leonardo triggered mass evacuations across the Iberian Peninsula, forcing voting postponements in the most severely flooded regions.

    Seguro’s victory represents a remarkable show of cross-party unity against the rising far-right movement. The 63-year-old former Socialist Party leader received unprecedented support from across the political spectrum, including endorsements from conservative figures and thousands of self-declared ‘non-socialists’ who signed an open letter backing his candidacy. This broad coalition united behind Seguro specifically to prevent Ventura’s far-right platform from gaining power.

    Despite his defeat, Ventura’s second-place finish demonstrates the continued influence of his Chega (Enough) party, which has experienced rapid growth since its formation in 2019 and now represents the second-largest bloc in Portugal’s parliament.

    The presidential role in Portugal, while largely ceremonial, carries significant constitutional powers including the authority to dissolve parliament, call snap elections, and veto legislation. Seguro will succeed conservative President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, marking a shift in the nation’s political landscape.

    Prime Minister Luís Montenegro, leader of Portugal’s centre-right government, had previously denounced Ventura as ‘xenophobic, racist and demagogic’ but notably declined to endorse either candidate in the runoff election.

  • Iran’s FM says nuclear talks to continue if US shows ‘necessary seriousness’

    Iran’s FM says nuclear talks to continue if US shows ‘necessary seriousness’

    TEHRAN – Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi declared on Sunday that the continuation of indirect nuclear negotiations with the United States hinges entirely on Washington demonstrating ‘necessary seriousness’ toward reaching a diplomatic resolution. The statement came during a press briefing in Tehran where Araghchi elaborated on Friday’s talks mediated by Oman in Muscat.

    Araghchi presented a contradictory assessment of American intentions, noting that while some signals suggest genuine diplomatic willingness, other actions—including ongoing sanctions enforcement and concerning military movements in West Asia—cast doubt on U.S. commitment. The Foreign Minister emphasized that the negotiation format itself doesn’t prevent agreement, but substantive issues regarding ‘excessive and unrealistic demands’ from Washington pose significant obstacles.

    The Iranian diplomat firmly stated that Tehran would never relinquish its right to peaceful nuclear development, including uranium enrichment capabilities, and clarified that Iran’s missile program remains strictly off the negotiation table. Simultaneously, Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces Abdolrahim Mousavi indicated that while Iran seeks to avoid regional conflict, the nation remains fully prepared for such military escalation.

    The recently resumed diplomatic engagement occurs against a backdrop of heightened regional tensions and substantial U.S. military deployment in the area, marking the first significant dialogue since the collapse of the 2015 nuclear agreement.

  • Romania’s president says invited to attend Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ meeting on Feb 19

    Romania’s president says invited to attend Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ meeting on Feb 19

    Romanian President Nicusor Dan confirmed via his official Facebook page on Sunday that the nation has received a formal invitation to participate in the inaugural assembly of former U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed ‘Board of Peace.’ The high-profile diplomatic gathering is scheduled to take place in Washington on February 19th.

    President Dan emphasized that Romania has not yet finalized its decision regarding attendance. The Eastern European nation’s participation hinges on ongoing diplomatic consultations with American counterparts concerning the meeting’s structure and operational framework.

    Critical to Romania’s potential involvement is the condition that the Board’s foundational charter undergoes substantial revisions. As a non-member state seeking possible future membership, Bucharest seeks clarity on procedural mechanisms and substantive commitments before committing to participate.

    This development occurs amidst broader international scrutiny of Trump’s geopolitical initiative, which has generated mixed reactions from global powers. Several nations have already declared their positions regarding participation, creating a complex diplomatic landscape for middle powers like Romania to navigate.

    The invitation places Romania at a strategic crossroads, balancing its traditional Atlanticist orientation with cautious pragmatism toward unconventional diplomatic platforms. The decision will likely reflect broader calculations about multilateral engagement formats and evolving transatlantic relations.

  • Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal rejects foreign rule in Gaza

    Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal rejects foreign rule in Gaza

    In a definitive address at a conference in Doha, Qatar, Hamas political leader Khaled Meshaal articulated the Palestinian movement’s firm rejection of any foreign control over Gaza and its refusal to surrender its weapons. This stance directly challenges calls for disarmament from both Israel and the United States.

    Meshaal defended the right to armed resistance as long as Israeli occupation persists, stating, ‘Criminalising the resistance, its weapons and those who have led it is something we should not accept… Resistance is the right of people under occupation. It is something nations are proud of.’

    This declaration comes as the second phase of a U.S.-brokered ceasefire initiative, initiated in mid-January following a nominal truce on October 10, envisions Hamas’s disarmament and a gradual Israeli military withdrawal from the enclave.

    Parallel to these political developments, Israeli officials are reportedly exploring economic opportunities arising from Gaza’s reconstruction. According to Haaretz, senior Israeli finance ministry and military officials discussed potential projects, including the construction of a highway in Israel connecting to Gaza. The proposal suggests that countries seeking access to Gaza via Israel would fund such infrastructure development, including a southern route that would improve travel between Gaza and the West Bank. Additionally, Israeli officials examined economic prospects in supplying electricity to Gaza.

    While Hamas has governed Gaza since 2007 and remains opposed to disarmament, the movement has indicated potential flexibility regarding transferring weapons to a future Palestinian-led authority. The U.S. plan proposes temporary governance by a committee of 15 Palestinian technocrats under the authority of a ‘Peace Council’ chaired by former President Donald Trump.

    Meshaal emphasized that any peace council must adopt a ‘balanced approach’ facilitating Gaza’s reconstruction and humanitarian aid delivery, while firmly asserting Palestinian autonomy: ‘We adhere to our national principles and reject the logic of guardianship, any foreign intervention, or the return of a mandate in any form… Palestinians must be governed by Palestinians. Gaza belongs to the people of Gaza and to Palestine. We will not accept foreign domination.’

  • Bangladesh seeks UN help to probe killing of uprising leader

    Bangladesh seeks UN help to probe killing of uprising leader

    The interim government of Bangladesh has formally requested United Nations support for an independent investigation into the assassination of Sharif Osman Hadi, a prominent figure in the nation’s 2024 youth-led uprising. In an official diplomatic communiqué dispatched to Geneva, Bangladeshi authorities have appealed to the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to provide technical and institutional assistance for what they describe as a “fair, impartial and expeditious” probe.

    Hadi, aged 32, was fatally shot by masked assailants in Dhaka last December and subsequently succumbed to his injuries at a medical facility in Singapore. His untimely death ignited widespread violent demonstrations across the country, reflecting deep-seated political tensions.

    The slain leader had been preparing to contest upcoming parliamentary elections as an independent candidate. These polls represent a crucial milestone in establishing Bangladesh’s first democratically elected administration since the ousting of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.

    The current caretaker government, under the leadership of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus, has reaffirmed its dedication to maintaining “the highest standards of transparency and accountability” throughout the investigation process. Authorities have pledged to identify and prosecute all individuals responsible for the political killing.

    Hadi had gained recognition as a vocal critic of India, where the deposed Prime Minister Hasina has sought refuge since fleeing Dhaka during the July 2024 uprising that ended her administration. His supporters have memorialized him as both a martyr and symbolic figurehead for the anti-establishment youth movement that continues to transform Bangladesh’s volatile political landscape.