分类: politics

  • Taiwan compatriots invited to mark historic anniversary

    Taiwan compatriots invited to mark historic anniversary

    In a significant move to honor historical milestones, Taiwan compatriots have been invited to participate in a commemorative event marking the 80th anniversary of Taiwan’s restoration to China. The event, scheduled to take place on the mainland, was announced by Zhu Fenglian, spokeswoman for the State Council Taiwan Affairs Office, on Wednesday. The gathering aims to unite Chinese people worldwide, including those from both sides of the Taiwan Strait, to reflect on the shared history of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression (1931-45) and to honor the heroes who contributed to Taiwan’s return to the motherland.

    Zhu emphasized the importance of this commemoration in safeguarding the victorious outcome of the war and protecting the common heritage of the Chinese nation. She also extended a warm invitation to Taiwan compatriots to join their mainland counterparts in celebrating the pride and dignity of being Chinese.

    However, the event has faced opposition from Taiwan’s ‘mainland affairs council,’ which has prohibited public officials and related individuals from participating in mainland-organized activities. Zhu condemned this stance as a separatist move by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities, accusing them of distorting historical facts and undermining the significance of the war’s victory.

    Zhu also addressed the DPP’s call for ‘equal dialogue’ with the mainland, stating that such efforts are futile without recognizing the 1992 Consensus, which affirms the principle that both sides of the Strait belong to one China. She reiterated that the 1992 Consensus remains the cornerstone of cross-Strait peace and cooperation.

    Despite these challenges, the mainland continues to promote cross-Strait exchanges through various measures, including facilitating travel permits for first-time visitors from Taiwan and expanding entry ports. Zhu highlighted that the mainland’s high-quality economic and social development during the 15th Five-Year Plan period (2026-30) will provide more opportunities for Taiwan compatriots and enterprises, further enhancing cross-Strait economic and cultural ties.

  • What’s at stake as Trump boat strikes strain US-Colombia alliance

    What’s at stake as Trump boat strikes strain US-Colombia alliance

    The longstanding alliance between the United States and Colombia, once a cornerstone of Washington’s Latin American strategy, is now teetering on the brink of collapse. Since President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, tensions between him and Colombian President Gustavo Petro have escalated, culminating in a dramatic suspension of US aid to Colombia. This move came after Trump accused Petro of encouraging drug production, while Petro countered by alleging US military strikes violated Colombian sovereignty and resulted in civilian deaths. The rift between the two leaders, who hail from opposite ends of the political spectrum, has exposed deep fissures in a partnership that has endured for decades. The US-Colombia alliance, forged in the early 2000s under the ‘Plan Colombia’ initiative, aimed to combat drug trafficking and strengthen Colombian security forces. While the program achieved some successes, including weakening the FARC guerrilla group, it has faced criticism for failing to address the root causes of drug production. Cocaine production in Colombia has reached record highs, and the US military’s recent campaign in the Caribbean has highlighted the persistence of the drug trade. The suspension of aid, which exceeded $400 million in 2024, threatens to undermine Colombia’s security efforts and embolden organized crime groups. Analysts warn that the breakdown of this alliance could have far-reaching consequences for both nations, as they remain deeply interdependent in their fight against narcotics. The situation is further complicated by Petro’s domestic challenges, including rising violence from armed groups, and Trump’s controversial drug enforcement policies, which have drawn criticism for their legality and effectiveness. As the two leaders continue to clash, the future of US-Colombia relations hangs in the balance.

  • An ex-first lady, a tycoon and a ‘safe pair of hands’ vie for power in a cocoa superpower

    An ex-first lady, a tycoon and a ‘safe pair of hands’ vie for power in a cocoa superpower

    The upcoming presidential election in Ivory Coast, scheduled for Saturday, is set against a backdrop of vibrant campaign rallies, yet the festive atmosphere masks deep-seated political tensions in the world’s largest cocoa producer. Incumbent President Alassane Ouattara, affectionately known as ‘Ado’ by his supporters, is seeking a controversial fourth term, a move that has sparked significant backlash despite being constitutionally permissible. Ouattara, credited with steering the nation towards economic growth following a brutal civil war, now faces criticism from those who view his candidacy as a threat to democratic principles. The political landscape is further complicated by the disqualification of prominent opposition figures, including Tidjane Thiam and former President Laurent Gbagbo, whose refusal to accept defeat in the 2010 election triggered a violent conflict that left over 3,000 dead. Ouattara’s challengers include Simone Gbagbo, Laurent Gbagbo’s former wife and a prominent opposition leader, Jean-Louis Billon, a wealthy businessman, Henriette Lagou Adjoua, a women’s rights advocate, and Ahoua Don Mello, a former ally of Gbagbo. Each candidate brings a unique vision for the country, with Billon focusing on economic modernization and generational change, while Simone Gbagbo emphasizes education and youth opportunities. Despite the economic progress under Ouattara, many Ivorians feel left behind, with rising living costs and unemployment fueling discontent. The election is also marked by regional loyalties, with Ouattara enjoying strong support in the north, Simone Gbagbo drawing backing from the west and southwest, and Billon appealing to urban voters. The campaign has not been without controversy, with recent protests met with a swift government crackdown, raising concerns about potential post-election unrest. As the nation prepares to vote, the question remains whether Ivory Coast will choose continuity with Ouattara or opt for a new direction with one of his challengers.

  • Dutch general election focuses on migration and housing crisis as Wilders seeks another win

    Dutch general election focuses on migration and housing crisis as Wilders seeks another win

    As the Netherlands approaches its parliamentary elections on October 29, the political discourse is dominated by two contentious issues: migration and the chronic housing shortage. These themes reflect broader debates across Europe, where right-wing politics are gaining traction.

  • Judge to rule in 1972 Bloody Sunday murder case against former British soldier

    Judge to rule in 1972 Bloody Sunday murder case against former British soldier

    In a landmark ruling set for Thursday, the fate of the only British soldier charged in the 1972 Bloody Sunday massacre will be determined in a Northern Ireland courtroom. Judge Patrick Lynch will deliver the verdict at Belfast Crown Court, deciding whether the former paratrooper, identified only as Soldier F, is guilty of murder and attempted murder during one of the deadliest episodes of sectarian violence known as ‘The Troubles.’ The incident, which occurred on January 20, 1972, in Londonderry (also known as Derry), saw 13 people killed and 15 wounded when British troops opened fire on unarmed civilians during a civil rights march. Soldier F, whose identity remains protected to prevent retaliation, is accused of killing two individuals and attempting to kill five others. The event has become a symbol of the conflict between Catholic supporters of a united Ireland and Protestant factions loyal to the United Kingdom. While the 1998 Good Friday Agreement largely ended the violence, tensions persist. Families of the victims continue to seek justice, while supporters of army veterans argue that investigations have unfairly targeted them. Soldier F, who did not testify in his defense, claimed in a 2016 police interview that he had no ‘reliable recollection’ of the events but was certain he had fulfilled his duties. Defense lawyer Mark Mulholland criticized the prosecution’s case as ‘fundamentally flawed,’ citing reliance on unreliable witnesses and fading memories. The prosecution, however, argued that Soldier F and his comrades acted without justification, intending to kill. The case has been marred by delays and setbacks since the 2010 Saville Inquiry, which overturned an earlier exoneration of the troops and paved the way for Soldier F’s prosecution. Former Prime Minister David Cameron previously described the killings as ‘unjustified and unjustifiable.’ Soldier F has pleaded not guilty to two counts of murder and five counts of attempted murder.

  • What do US sanctions on Russian oil mean, and who could be affected?

    What do US sanctions on Russian oil mean, and who could be affected?

    In a significant escalation of economic measures, US President Donald Trump announced stringent new sanctions targeting Russia’s two largest oil producers, Rosneft and Lukoil. The move, unveiled via Trump’s Truth Social platform, aims to pressure Moscow into ending its ongoing conflict in Ukraine. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasized that these companies are critical financiers of the Kremlin’s military operations, describing the sanctions as a response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s refusal to halt what he termed a “senseless war.”

    The sanctions, administered by the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), effectively blacklist Rosneft and Lukoil, which together account for nearly half of Russia’s crude oil exports. Rosneft, a state-controlled entity led by Putin’s close ally Igor Sechin, is responsible for almost half of Russia’s oil production, contributing 6% of global output. Lukoil, a privately held firm, also plays a pivotal role in Russia’s energy sector. Combined, the two companies export approximately 3.1 million barrels of oil daily.

    Trump’s decision follows similar measures by the UK and comes just a day after he indefinitely postponed a planned meeting with Putin in Budapest. The US president expressed frustration over the lack of progress in peace negotiations, stating, “Every time I speak to Vladimir, I have good conversations and then they don’t go anywhere.”

    Experts suggest the sanctions have dual objectives: to cripple Russia’s industrial capacity to wage war and to coerce Moscow into accepting peace terms. Dr. Stuart Rollo of the University of Sydney’s Centre for International Security Studies noted that while the sanctions may not immediately alter the military balance in Ukraine, they could force Russia to reconsider its stance as economic pressures mount. Michael Raska of Nanyang Technological University added that shrinking profit margins may compel Russia to choose between socio-economic stability and financing a protracted conflict.

    The sanctions are expected to have far-reaching implications, not only for Russia but also for its major oil importers, including China and India. Both nations have significantly increased their reliance on Russian energy since the Ukraine war began. Trump has urged these countries to halt purchases of Russian oil, warning of potential secondary sanctions. Indian state refiners are reportedly reviewing their trade documents to ensure compliance, while Reliance, India’s top buyer of Russian oil, is recalibrating its imports.

    The announcement has already caused global oil prices to surge, with Brent crude rising by 5%. While the long-term impact on oil prices remains uncertain, the immediate effect underscores the interconnectedness of global energy markets and the potential for further economic disruptions.

  • EU summit aims for new Russia sanctions and a plan to use Moscow’s assets to help Ukraine

    EU summit aims for new Russia sanctions and a plan to use Moscow’s assets to help Ukraine

    European Union leaders convened in Brussels on Thursday for a critical summit aimed at approving a new set of sanctions against Russia and advancing plans to utilize Moscow’s frozen assets to bolster Ukraine’s war effort and economy over the next two years. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy participated in the one-day meeting, joining his European allies in advocating for a ceasefire to end nearly four years of conflict. EU Council President António Costa emphasized in his invitation letter that both sustained support for Ukraine and continued pressure on Russia are essential for achieving a just and lasting peace. The summit follows U.S. President Donald Trump’s announcement that his proposed meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin is on hold, citing concerns over its potential futility. This development adds another layer of complexity to Trump’s fluctuating approach to resolving the Ukraine crisis. Meanwhile, EU leaders are also focused on Trump’s Gaza peace plan, seeking ways to maintain the bloc’s involvement in the process. Despite being the largest provider of aid to Palestinians, the EU faces challenges in influencing Israel due to internal divisions among member states. The summit occurs as Russian forces intensify attacks on Ukraine’s power grid, exacerbating the humanitarian crisis as winter approaches. Earlier this week, Ukraine’s staunchest European allies, part of the ‘coalition of the willing,’ rejected any proposal requiring Ukraine to cede territory in exchange for peace, a suggestion recently floated by Trump. The U.K. is set to host a meeting of this coalition on Friday. On the financial front, EU leaders are determined to proceed with plans to use billions of dollars in frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine’s military and economic needs, despite reservations from some member states. Belgium, which holds the largest portion of these assets—approximately $225 billion—has expressed caution, seeking assurances from its European partners before taking action. Ukraine’s projected budget and military requirements for 2026 and 2027 are estimated at $153 billion. Additionally, EU leaders are expected to endorse a new ‘road map’ to enhance Europe’s defense capabilities against a potential Russian attack by the end of the decade, with top officials warning that Russia could target another European country within 3-5 years.

  • Barbs fly as Mamdani and Cuomo meet in final, furious New York City mayoral debate

    Barbs fly as Mamdani and Cuomo meet in final, furious New York City mayoral debate

    In a fiery final debate ahead of the New York City mayoral election, the three leading candidates—Democrat Zohran Mamdani, Republican Curtis Sliwa, and independent Andrew Cuomo—engaged in heated exchanges over key issues, including housing, homelessness, and their approaches to dealing with former President Donald Trump. Held at a packed university auditorium in Queens, the 90-minute debate saw candidates trading personal jabs and defending their records, with Mamdani maintaining his lead in recent polls.

    Mamdani, positioned at center stage, faced sharp criticism from both opponents. Cuomo accused him of absenteeism as a state assemblyman, while Sliwa questioned his stance on affordable housing initiatives. Mamdani fired back, blaming Cuomo for the city’s struggles during his tenure as governor. The debate also revisited allegations of sexual harassment against Cuomo, with Mamdani highlighting the presence of one of Cuomo’s accusers in the audience.

    The candidates unanimously criticized a recent federal immigration raid in Chinatown, arguing that local authorities should handle such issues. However, their approaches to engaging with Trump diverged. Sliwa emphasized negotiation, Mamdani accused Cuomo of being Trump’s puppet, and Cuomo touted his experience in dealing with the former president.

    The Middle East conflict also took center stage, with Mamdani defending his pro-Palestine stance against accusations of antisemitism. Cuomo and Sliwa criticized his views, while Cuomo affirmed the right to protest but condemned antisemitic behavior.

    As early voting begins, the debate marked the candidates’ last high-profile opportunity to sway voters before Election Day.

  • NYC mayoral candidates clash over Trump and political experience

    NYC mayoral candidates clash over Trump and political experience

    In a highly anticipated final debate before the November elections, New York City mayoral candidates Zohran Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo, and Curtis Sliwa engaged in a heated exchange, with discussions centering on former President Donald Trump and the significance of political experience. The debate, held just days before Election Day, highlighted stark contrasts in their policy visions and leadership styles. Mamdani, a progressive advocate, emphasized the need for systemic change, while Cuomo, a seasoned politician, touted his extensive experience in governance. Sliwa, known for his grassroots activism, positioned himself as an outsider challenging the political establishment. The candidates also sparred over their stances on Trump, with Mamdani and Cuomo criticizing his legacy, while Sliwa adopted a more nuanced approach. The debate underscored the high stakes of the upcoming election, as New Yorkers prepare to choose their next mayor amidst a backdrop of economic recovery and social transformation.

  • Youth who led Madagascar protests hope coup leader will continue to hear them as president

    Youth who led Madagascar protests hope coup leader will continue to hear them as president

    In the wake of Madagascar’s recent military coup, led by Colonel Michael Randrianirina, the young protesters who fueled the uprising are yet to see tangible improvements in their daily lives. Donah Falia, a 20-year-old accounting student, continues to endure long waits for water and faces a bleak job market, reflecting the persistent challenges in the capital, Antananarivo. Despite the overthrow of democratically elected President Andry Rajoelina, the youth remain skeptical about the new regime’s ability to address their grievances. Randrianirina’s rise to power follows a familiar pattern in Madagascar’s post-colonial history, echoing similar military takeovers across Africa in recent years. While many celebrated the end of Rajoelina’s rule, the protesters’ demands for better living conditions, employment, and utility access remain unmet. The coup, which began with mass protests in September, saw security forces crack down harshly, resulting in casualties. Randrianirina’s CAPSAT unit eventually sided with the demonstrators, forcing Rajoelina to flee. The youth, inspired by global Gen Z movements, rallied around symbols of change but now face uncertainty about the new government’s commitment to their cause. Experts warn that military regimes often fail to address systemic issues like corruption and poverty, raising doubts about Randrianirina’s long-term effectiveness. The youth, however, remain vigilant, vowing to hold the new government accountable if their demands are ignored.