分类: politics

  • Americans worry about war in Iran, Trump’s promises

    Americans worry about war in Iran, Trump’s promises

    A significant political storm is brewing within the United States as President Donald Trump faces mounting criticism over his decision to initiate military action against Iran, with many of his former supporters expressing feelings of betrayal over what they perceive as broken campaign promises.

    The discontent stems from Trump’s 2024 campaign rhetoric that heavily emphasized an ‘America First’ policy and criticized US involvement in prolonged foreign conflicts. Prominent conservative voices including influential podcaster Joe Rogan, who commands an audience of over 16 million followers, have publicly denounced the military action. ‘He ran on no more wars, end these stupid, senseless wars, and then we have one that we can’t even really clearly define why we did it,’ Rogan stated, capturing the sentiment of many disillusioned supporters.

    Recent polling data reveals substantial public opposition to the conflict. A CNN survey conducted between February 28 and March 1 indicates that 59% of Americans disapprove of military action against Iran, while only 41% express support. Furthermore, 54% believe that US military engagement will actually increase the Iranian threat to American interests.

    The financial implications are becoming increasingly concerning. According to New York Times reports, Pentagon officials briefed lawmakers that the initial week of military operations cost approximately $11.3 billion—a figure that excludes preliminary buildup expenses. This expenditure significantly exceeds earlier projections from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, which had estimated $3.7 billion for the first 100 hours of operations.

    Conservative activist Tucker Carlson, known for his regular White House visits, reportedly described the airstrikes as ‘absolutely disgusting and evil’ and had actively lobbied against military action. The growing dissent is reflected in digital media as well, with content creator Candace Owens’ video titled ‘Donald Trump has Betrayed America’ amassing 2.3 million views and over 27,000 comments within just two days.

    Many Americans express concern that the administration has created an untenable situation where either withdrawal or escalation carries severe consequences. As Houston resident Michael articulated, ‘If the US withdraws soon, we would look weak because Iran would be able to recoup with more vengeance against the US. We can’t eliminate the Iran threat without considerable military involvement or a new regime friendly to the US.’

  • Metronome and navigator: How China’s five-year plans steer unprecedented modernization

    Metronome and navigator: How China’s five-year plans steer unprecedented modernization

    BEIJING – From an agrarian society with negligible industrial capacity in 1953 to an emerging spacefaring nation by 2030, China’s transformative journey has been orchestrated through a unique governance mechanism: the Five-Year Plan system. As the 15th iteration (2026-2030) takes shape during China’s annual legislative sessions, this strategic framework continues to steer the world’s most ambitious modernization project.

    The fundamental question underlying these blueprints is how a nation sustains developmental progress across generations on a scale never before attempted. The answer lies in what experts describe as a “cascading architecture” of governance – where overarching national strategies translate into sector-specific and regional implementations, creating synchronized progress toward common objectives.

    Unlike conventional growth models focused solely on economic metrics, China’s 15th Five-Year Plan demonstrates multidimensional development priorities. While maintaining economic expansion within an “appropriate range” (with 2026 targets set at 4.5-5%), the plan emphasizes qualitative transformation across strategic sectors including artificial intelligence, quantum technology, nuclear fusion, and 6G communications. Notably, over one-third of key indicators address quality-of-life improvements, including raising average life expectancy to 80 years.

    Three visual metaphors in the policy document encapsulate China’s modernization ethos: pristine ecological landscapes, rich cultural heritage preservation, and clean energy transformation. Together, they represent a development paradigm prioritizing shared prosperity over polarization, material and cultural advancement over lopsided growth, and ecological harmony over environmental degradation.

    The institutional continuity of this planning system distinguishes China’s approach from other nations. “China is not the first country to formulate five-year plans, but it is the only one to have sustained the practice and achieved the twin miracles of rapid economic development and long-term social stability,” noted Yang Yongheng, director of Tsinghua University’s China Institute for Development Planning.

    For global investors, these plans provide unprecedented predictability amid mounting international uncertainties. Business leaders describe the system as both “metronome” and “navigator” – translating long-term vision into phased implementation while signaling future economic directions. “The five-year plan transforms investment decisions from probabilistic bets to calculated strategic positioning,” observed Simon Smith of Taikoo Engine Services.

    Multinational corporations have learned to synchronize their China strategies with this planning rhythm. “It provides a consistent cadence for synchronizing priorities between our global headquarters and China organization,” explained Liliana Lucioni, President of Coach China.

    The current plan’s emphasis on emerging industries is already reshaping global investment perspectives. “Chinese assets are no longer just a portfolio option. They are a strategic must-have,” stated Janice Hu of UBS Securities, noting dynamic innovation in AI, semiconductors, and renewable energy that is transforming international perceptions of Chinese technological capabilities.

  • Zelenskyy says Ukraine awaits White House sign-off on US drone production deal

    Zelenskyy says Ukraine awaits White House sign-off on US drone production deal

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced on Thursday that Kyiv awaits White House authorization for a comprehensive drone manufacturing agreement initially proposed last year. This development emerges as nations worldwide reassess their aerial defense capabilities following recent Middle East hostilities that revealed vulnerabilities in conventional systems.

    The proposed bilateral agreement would encompass diverse drone varieties and integrated air defense mechanisms functioning as a unified network. This system is specifically engineered to neutralize mass assaults involving hundreds or potentially thousands of Iranian-designed Shahed drones and missiles. Zelenskyy communicated via social media that the document remains unsigned despite its strategic importance.

    Russia has deployed tens of thousands of Iranian-origin Shahed drones against Ukraine throughout the ongoing invasion, recently executing its most extensive nighttime offensive comprising over 800 drones and decoys. Concurrently, Iran has utilized identical drone technology against Middle Eastern targets in retaliation for joint U.S.-Israeli operations.

    Ukrainian innovations have revolutionized aerial warfare defense through economically efficient drone interception systems, some costing merely several thousand dollars. These advancements have fundamentally transformed air defense protocols amid growing global interest. However, wartime export restrictions currently prevent international sales.

    The escalating Middle Eastern conflict may incentivize U.S. officials to approve Ukraine’s proposal, according to Zelenskyy’s assessment. Such agreements would strengthen Kyiv’s diplomatic positioning in future negotiations with Moscow while securing sustained international backing for Ukraine’s defensive efforts.

    Meanwhile, U.S.-brokered peace discussions regarding Europe’s largest military conflict since WWII remain suspended due to Middle East tensions. Zelenskyy’s current diplomatic tour includes meetings with NATO ally Romania, followed by Paris discussions with French President Emmanuel Macron.

    Recent analyses reveal that Russia’s oil revenues—critical for financing its military operations—have surged since the Middle East conflict began. The nonprofit Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air reports daily oil earnings averaging 14% above February levels, attributed to rising crude prices.

    Macron’s office confirmed discussions will address countermeasures against Russia’s sanctions-evading ‘shadow fleet’ of oil tankers. Zelenskyy’s Romanian agenda includes meetings with President Nicușor Dan, Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan, and inspections at F-16 pilot training facilities. Romania has served as vital corridor for Ukrainian grain exports and provided energy assistance amid Russian attacks on Ukraine’s power infrastructure.

  • China’s new five-year plan charts world’s largest modernization by population

    China’s new five-year plan charts world’s largest modernization by population

    China has embarked on an unprecedented modernization campaign targeting its entire population of 1.4 billion people, as outlined in the draft 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030) currently under review during the national legislative session. This ambitious blueprint represents the largest-scale modernization effort in human history, aiming to fundamentally transform the world’s most populous nation by 2035.

    The comprehensive plan sets forth concrete economic targets, including doubling the 2020 per capita GDP to exceed $20,000—a benchmark for moderately developed nations. Beyond economic metrics, the vision encompasses strengthening China’s scientific technological capabilities, national defense systems, composite national strength, and global influence while enhancing living standards and happiness for its citizens.

    Demographic challenges present significant hurdles, with China’s massive population base creating resource constraints that place per capita arable land, water resources, and crude oil holdings substantially below global averages. Additionally, declining birth rates and rapid population aging compound the complexity of this modernization endeavor.

    The strategy emphasizes high-quality development centered on innovation, coordination, green development, openness, and shared growth. Specific targets include increasing R&D spending by over 7% annually, raising the digital economy’s contribution to 12.5% of GDP, reducing carbon intensity by 17% from 2025 levels, and achieving 25% non-fossil fuel energy consumption by 2030.

    Social development objectives feature raising average life expectancy to 80 years, increasing practicing physicians to 3.7 per 1,000 people, and improving permanent urbanization rates to 71%. The plan also addresses food security through targeted grain production capacity of 725 million tonnes and urban renewal programs to enhance housing conditions.

    Experts note that China’s distinctive approach rejects Western modernization paradigms in favor of tailored policies addressing unique national conditions. The massive population, while presenting challenges, also offers advantages including an enormous talent pool, abundant technology application scenarios, and a vibrant domestic market that can foster balanced trade and coordinated development.

    Internationally, China’s successful modernization would more than double the proportion of humanity achieving developed status—from approximately one-seventh to one-third of the global population. The expansion of China’s middle-income group and super-large domestic market is expected to generate sustained momentum for the global economy, with foreign companies already signaling strong commitment to the Chinese market.

    For developing nations, China’s modernization path offers an alternative development model demonstrating that progress need not follow a single template, but can instead adapt to specific national conditions, priorities, and developmental stages.

  • Military push in Latin America raises concerns

    Military push in Latin America raises concerns

    The United States has initiated a new military coalition targeting drug cartels in Latin America, a strategic move that regional experts characterize as an effort to reestablish hemispheric dominance while potentially compromising regional stability. The “Shield of the Americas” summit, convened in Florida on March 7, featured President Donald Trump announcing the formation of a regional military partnership, framing it as an essential response to transnational criminal organizations posing critical threats to hemispheric security.

    Academic analysts challenge the official narrative, suggesting the anti-drug justification conceals broader geopolitical objectives. According to Cao Ting, Director of the Center for Latin American Studies at Fudan University, the emphasis on combating crime serves primarily to legitimize US interventionism while advancing Washington’s goal of strengthened regional control. This perspective finds support in the explicitly stated intentions within the US National Security Strategy to restore American preeminence throughout the Western Hemisphere.

    The proposed security framework reveals significant structural concerns regarding burden distribution and sovereignty. Niu Haibin of the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies notes the “uneven nature” of joint military operations that disproportionately assign responsibility for addressing drug production, transit, and consumption to Latin American nations. This approach, experts argue, effectively compromises the strategic autonomy of regional states in sovereign and security matters.

    The summit attendance pattern itself revealed political fractures, with notable absences from major regional powers including Brazil and Mexico. Their non-participation reflects apprehension about potential sovereignty violations through US military operations conducted within their territories. The gathering has accentuated existing political divisions across Latin America, particularly the growing ideological schism between left-leaning and right-leaning governments.

    Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel condemned the initiative as “reactionary and neocolonial,” characterizing it as both an assault on the Proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace and a threat to regional integration aspirations. Experts further warn that heightened US involvement may intensify pressure on left-wing governments, exacerbate political fragmentation, and increase overall regional uncertainty.

    The effectiveness of the newly established anti-drug mechanism faces serious questions due to the absence of critical narcotics-combating nations like Mexico and Colombia. Additionally, Trump’s warnings against “hostile foreign influence” gaining footholds in the hemisphere introduce another dimension of geopolitical tension. Analysts observe that while participating nations might share common ground on combating drug trafficking, consensus regarding broader security threats—particularly those related to alleged foreign influence—remains considerably more limited.

    Niu highlights the US tendency toward “pan-securitization,” framing diverse issues as security concerns to justify intervention, as demonstrated in approaches to Venezuela and the Panama Canal. This security narrative fundamentally conflicts with Latin American aspirations for active globalization participation and diversified economic partnerships. Forcing US security strategies upon the region, experts conclude, may ultimately generate increased tension in inter-American relations rather than enhanced cooperation.

  • China Coast Guard vessel Sandu conducts patrols in South China Sea

    China Coast Guard vessel Sandu conducts patrols in South China Sea

    The China Coast Guard vessel Sandu has executed strategic patrol operations throughout the South China Sea, reinforcing Beijing’s maritime claims in the contested region. According to official reports from March 12, 2026, the patrols represent China’s ongoing commitment to protecting what it considers its sovereign territories and maritime interests.

    The Sandu, a key asset in China’s maritime enforcement fleet, conducted comprehensive formation collaboration training during these missions. Photographic evidence released by state media depicts law enforcement personnel actively engaged in operational exercises aboard the vessel on February 28, 2026, demonstrating China’s continued investment in maritime security capabilities.

    These patrols occur against the backdrop of persistent territorial disputes in the South China Sea, where multiple nations maintain overlapping claims. China’s coast guard operations have increasingly become the primary instrument for asserting Beijing’s claims in these strategically vital waterways, through which trillions in global trade passes annually.

    The deployment reflects China’s broader strategy of maintaining a constant presence in disputed areas, employing coast guard vessels rather than military ships to assert claims while minimizing overt military escalation. This approach has become a hallmark of China’s maritime strategy under President Xi Jinping’s administration.

    Analysts note that such patrols serve both practical enforcement purposes and symbolic functions, demonstrating China’s capability to maintain continuous operations far from its mainland shores. The South China Sea remains one of Asia’s most potential flashpoints, with competing claims involving Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan.

  • Chile’s new president Jose Antonio Kast takes office

    Chile’s new president Jose Antonio Kast takes office

    In a historic transition of power, José Antonio Kast was formally inaugurated as Chile’s President on Wednesday, March 11, 2026, marking the commencement of his four-year presidential term spanning 2026-2030. The ceremonial proceedings unfolded at La Moneda Presidential Palace in Santiago, where the 60-year-old legal professional and former congressman received the presidential sash from Senate President Paulina Núñez.

    During his solemn oath-taking ceremony, President Kast made resolute commitments to ‘safeguard the nation’s sovereignty’ and ‘rigorously uphold constitutional principles and legal frameworks.’ His ascent to leadership represents a significant political shift from his predecessor Gabriel Boric’s administration.

    Political analysts immediately highlighted the formidable challenges awaiting the new administration, with pressing issues including national security enhancement, management of irregular migration patterns, economic revitalization strategies, and comprehensive governmental restructuring.

    Kast’s presidential journey demonstrates remarkable persistence, having previously contested the highest office unsuccessfully in both 2017 and 2021. His eventual electoral triumph came on December 14th, when he secured an unprecedented voter mandate in Chilean history, defeating opponent Jeannette Jara in the decisive runoff election. This record-breaking electoral performance signals substantial political transformation within the South American nation.

  • UN Security Council fails to pass resolution calling for immediate halt of military activities in Middle East

    UN Security Council fails to pass resolution calling for immediate halt of military activities in Middle East

    The United Nations Security Council encountered a significant diplomatic impasse on Wednesday when it rejected a draft resolution calling for an immediate cessation of military activities across the Middle East. The proposed measure, sponsored by Russia, urged all conflicting parties to halt hostilities and refrain from further escalation while condemning attacks targeting civilian populations and infrastructure.

    The voting outcome revealed deep international divisions, with the resolution receiving only four affirmative votes from Russia, China, Pakistan, and Somalia. The United States and Latvia cast opposing votes, while nine council members opted for abstention, effectively blocking the resolution’s passage.

    Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia expressed profound disappointment with the outcome, stating that numerous Security Council members had failed to demonstrate sufficient resolve and wisdom to support the proposed text. The diplomatic setback occurred against the backdrop of escalating regional tensions triggered by joint U.S.-Israeli military operations against Iran that commenced on February 28, followed by Iran’s retaliatory measures throughout the region.

    In a contrasting development, the Security Council successfully adopted an alternative resolution presented by Bahrain on behalf of the Gulf Cooperation Council. This measure, which garnered 13 favorable votes with two abstentions, specifically condemned Iranian attacks against GCC member states and Jordan. The resolution demands Iran immediately cease hostilities against these nations and declares such actions violations of international law that pose serious threats to global security.

    Iran’s Permanent Representative Amir Saeid Iravani strongly objected to this resolution, characterizing it as a manifest injustice against his country. He asserted that Iran considers the measure both unjust and unlawful, arguing that it contradicts the United Nations Charter and established international law principles.

  • US sends mixed signals on Iran

    US sends mixed signals on Iran

    Washington’s contradictory messaging on the Iran conflict is generating international confusion and potentially extending hostilities, according to security analysts monitoring the situation. The administration’s inconsistent statements risk alienating allies and complicating resolution efforts.

    The divergence in official positions became starkly evident on Tuesday when Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth asserted military operations would continue indefinitely until achieving “total and decisive” victory over Iran. This hardline stance directly contradicted President Donald Trump’s earlier declaration that the conflict was “very complete, pretty much” and proceeding ahead of schedule.

    Security experts interpret these conflicting messages as a deliberate strategy. Jack Midgley, principal consultant at Midgley & Company and Georgetown University adjunct professor, suggests the administration is employing multiple narratives to avoid accountability for potential negative outcomes. “Hegseth’s message pleases the Israelis and the US hardcore right,” Midgley observed, “while Trump’s message is intended for the international community and markets.”

    The leadership transition in Tehran further complicates diplomatic prospects. Iran has appointed Mojtaba Khamenei, son of slain supreme leader Ali Khamenei, as the new supreme leader, creating additional uncertainty about future negotiations.

    Philip Gordon, former national security adviser to Vice-President Kamala Harris, noted at a Brookings Institution webinar that the administration has struggled to maintain consistent objectives, vacillating between nuclear non-proliferation concerns and regime change ambitions. This policy inconsistency has created what Gordon describes as “a moving target” for both allies and adversaries.

    Military analysts including Seth Jones of the Center for Strategic and International Studies warn that achieving substantial damage to Iran through exclusively aerial and naval campaigns remains “very difficult,” suggesting limited effectiveness of current military strategies.

    Midgley advocates for immediate de-escalation, arguing that denying nuclear capabilities to Iran can only be achieved through negotiated settlements, which remain impossible while attacks continue. The scale of recent strikes has destroyed trust, with Midgley noting, “The barrier is that Iran cannot trust the US or Israel to negotiate in good faith.”

    The proposed US naval escort mission through the Strait of Hormuz faces practical and political challenges. Midgley characterizes the plan as “unworkable and politically unacceptable,” warning it would place naval assets within range of Iranian anti-ship missiles while potentially trading American lives for oil security.

    Energy security concerns persist regardless of military developments. Clayton Seigle of CSIS warns of ongoing supply disruption risks, citing attacks on critical infrastructure including Saudi Arabia’s Ras Tanura refinery and Qatar’s Ras Laffan LNG terminal.

  • Kuwait sees China ties flourishing

    Kuwait sees China ties flourishing

    Kuwait is positioning itself to significantly deepen its strategic partnership with China, aligning its national development goals with Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) while advocating for enhanced Chinese involvement in regional stability efforts. The announcement comes as the two nations prepare to commemorate the 55th anniversary of diplomatic relations this year.

    Sameeh Essa Johar Hayat, Kuwait’s Assistant Foreign Minister for Asian Affairs, characterized 2026 as a “year of achievements” that would elevate the comprehensive strategic partnership between the Gulf state and China. In an exclusive interview, Hayat emphasized that Kuwait meticulously follows Chinese policy announcements and development concepts, viewing China as the ideal partner to realize Kuwait’s Vision 2035 blueprint—an ambitious plan to transform the country into a regional financial and trade hub.

    The bilateral relationship has already yielded substantial benefits through BRI cooperation established since 2014. Major infrastructure projects include the new headquarters of Kuwait’s Central Bank and Sabah AlSalem University City, which have significantly upgraded local infrastructure and improved public welfare. Technological collaboration has also flourished, with Huawei partnering to make Kuwait the first Middle Eastern nation to achieve nationwide 5G coverage.

    Energy cooperation remains the cornerstone of the relationship, with Kuwait serving as China’s fifth-largest crude oil supplier—exporting one-third of its daily production to Chinese markets. Trade relationships have expanded dramatically, with China maintaining its position as Kuwait’s largest trading partner for eight consecutive years. The automotive sector illustrates this growth: of 67 auto brands currently sold in Kuwait, 27 are Chinese manufacturers—a remarkable increase from just seven or eight years ago.

    Beyond economic ties, Hayat stressed the strategic importance of China’s growing role in Middle Eastern stability. He revealed that Kuwait would participate at the highest level in upcoming China-Arab States and China-Gulf Cooperation Council summits, where regional security and development will feature prominently on agendas. “Now more than ever, we need China’s solutions—this should be an era of peace and development, not war,” Hayat asserted.

    Reflecting on China’s transformation since his first visit in 1982, Hayat described China’s modernization as a “miracle” and expressed confidence that China would continue to surprise the world with its achievements. The senior diplomat, who previously served as Kuwait’s ambassador to China from 2016 to 2023, personally embodies the growing ties—he proudly drives a Chinese Hongqi vehicle, noting his particular affection for the brand.