分类: politics

  • Kurdish-led SDF and the Syrian government agree to stop deadly fighting in Aleppo

    Kurdish-led SDF and the Syrian government agree to stop deadly fighting in Aleppo

    In a significant de-escalation move, the Syrian government and US-supported Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) have mutually agreed to halt hostilities after deadly clashes in Aleppo resulted in multiple casualties on Monday. The confrontation occurred during Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan’s diplomatic visit to the region.

    Syria’s official news agency SANA announced that the nation’s military command issued formal orders to cease targeting SDF positions. In reciprocal action, the Kurdish-led forces confirmed they have instructed their fighters to stop responding to Syrian government attacks. Both parties had initially exchanged accusations regarding responsibility for the violence.

    This temporary truce follows a landmark March agreement between SDF leader Mazloum Abdi and Syrian interim president Ahmed al-Sharaa to integrate the Kurdish forces with Damascus’ military structure. However, implementation has stalled due to resistance from the SDF and associated Kurdish factions.

    The geopolitical landscape is further complicated by Turkey’s designation of the SDF as a terrorist organization due to its affiliations with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which both the United States and European Union recognize as a terrorist group. Ankara has issued ultimatums demanding Kurdish forces abandon cooperation with Israel and honor their integration commitments.

    Analysts warn that failure to successfully incorporate the SDF into Syrian state forces could reignite military conflict, potentially derailing the nation’s recovery from fourteen years of devastating civil war that claimed hundreds of thousands of lives and displaced millions.

    The recent diplomatic engagement between Turkey and Syria signals warming relations since the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s government over a year ago. Fidan emphasized the interconnected stability of both nations, stating that ‘Syria’s stability means Turkey’s stability.’

  • Trump travelled on Epstein’s plane more than previously thought, prosecutor says

    Trump travelled on Epstein’s plane more than previously thought, prosecutor says

    Newly released Department of Justice documents have revealed that former President Donald Trump was documented as a passenger on Jeffrey Epstein’s private aircraft on eight separate occasions between 1993 and 1996. The disclosure comes from a January 2020 email written by an assistant U.S. attorney from the Southern District of New York, which was made public as part of the ongoing Epstein files release.

    The email correspondence, partially redacted to protect identities, indicates Trump traveled with Epstein’s associate Ghislaine Maxwell on at least four of these flights. Flight manifests also document Trump traveling with former wife Marla Maples, daughter Tiffany Trump, and son Eric Trump during various journeys. Notably, one 1993 flight reportedly listed only Epstein and Trump as passengers, while another flight included a then-20-year-old individual whose identity remains redacted.

    The Justice Department emphasized that these documents ‘contain untrue and sensationalist claims’ against Trump, specifically noting that allegations submitted to the FBI shortly before the 2020 election were ‘unfounded and false.’ Federal prosecutors stated that had these claims possessed any credibility, they would have been utilized against Trump previously.

    This document release, comprising over 30,000 pages, represents the largest batch of Epstein-related materials made public to date. The DOJ missed its congressional deadline to publish all Epstein files by last Friday, drawing criticism from both survivors and lawmakers across the political spectrum. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche acknowledged that not all materials would be released immediately, citing the need to protect victims as additional documents undergo review for future publication.

    Epstein died in a New York prison cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years imprisonment for her role in Epstein’s sex trafficking operation. Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing regarding his association with Epstein, claiming they had a falling out around 2004—years before Epstein’s initial arrest.

  • Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger call for joint ‘large-scale operations’ against extremists

    Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger call for joint ‘large-scale operations’ against extremists

    BAMAKO, Mali — The newly formed Alliance of Sahel States has initiated a significant military escalation against extremist groups operating throughout the region. Captain Ibrahim Traoré, Burkina Faso’s leader and newly appointed head of the tri-nation alliance, announced that the recently deployed joint battalion will soon expand into large-scale security operations across Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger.

    The three military-led governments, which collectively withdrew from West Africa’s regional bloc earlier this year, convened a summit on Tuesday to strengthen security and economic cooperation. This gathering followed the operational launch of a 5,000-personnel joint military battalion designed specifically to combat armed extremist organizations.

    These Sahel nations represent the epicenter of global extremist violence, with armed factions affiliated with both al-Qaida and the Islamic State creating the deadliest concentration of terrorism activity worldwide. All three countries have experienced military coups in recent years and contend with severely strained security forces.

    Niger’s junta leader, Abdourahamane Tchiani, emphasized the alliance’s commitment to sovereignty, stating that member states have terminated all foreign military occupations—a clear reference to the expulsion of French and American forces. “No country or interest group will decide for our countries anymore,” Tchiani declared during the summit.

    Despite this assertion of independence, the alliance has simultaneously cultivated strengthened security partnerships with Russia, signaling a strategic pivot in international allegiances.

    Regional security analysts note the considerable challenges facing the alliance. Rida Lyammouri of Morocco’s Policy Center for the New South observed that the Sahel’s multifaceted security crisis remains “very difficult to defeat” regardless of which external partners engage with the alliance.

    Ulf Laessing, head of the Sahel program at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, highlighted the alliance’s growing internal cohesion despite international sanctions and fractured diplomatic relations. The bloc “enjoys popularity among citizens of the three countries” and appears committed to expanding cooperation beyond immediate military objectives.

  • Bangladesh summons Indian envoy as protest erupts in New Delhi

    Bangladesh summons Indian envoy as protest erupts in New Delhi

    Diplomatic relations between Bangladesh and India have deteriorated significantly following the mob lynching of a Hindu garment worker in Dhaka on December 18. The incident, allegedly motivated by blasphemy accusations, has triggered a chain of protests and reciprocal diplomatic measures that have brought bilateral ties to a concerning low.

    In response to growing tensions, Bangladesh’s foreign ministry summoned Indian High Commissioner Pranay Verma on Tuesday to express “grave concern” over recent demonstrations outside Bangladeshi diplomatic facilities. This diplomatic action coincided with fresh protests in New Delhi, where hundreds of demonstrators waving saffron flags gathered near Bangladesh’s High Commission. Protesters from right-wing Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) organizations carried banners reading “Stop Killing Hindus in Bangladesh,” with clashes erupting between VHP members and security personnel.

    The underlying tensions stem from broader political turmoil in Bangladesh following the ouster of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who fled to India amid pro-democracy protests last year. India continues to consider Dhaka’s extradition requests for Hasina, who received a death sentence in absentia for her alleged role in suppressing the uprising.

    The situation further complicated when Sharif Osman Hadi, a parliamentary candidate and vocal India critic, was assassinated in Dhaka this month. Subsequent protests saw arson attacks on buildings perceived as pro-India, including newspaper offices and cultural institutions. In response to stone-throwing incidents at its diplomatic mission in Chattogram, India suspended visa services there, with Bangladesh reciprocating by temporarily suspending visa services in New Delhi.

    International observers, including Russia, have urged both nations to repair relations. Russian Ambassador to Bangladesh Alexander G. Khozin emphasized the urgency of reconciliation, stating “The sooner this happens, the better” in recent comments to the Dhaka Tribune.

  • Trump’s Fed chair choice could stoke stagflation risks

    Trump’s Fed chair choice could stoke stagflation risks

    President Donald Trump’s impending nomination for the next Federal Reserve chair has ignited concerns about potential political interference in monetary policy. In a recent Wall Street Journal interview, Trump indicated his selection process is nearing completion, with this decision carrying significant implications for financial markets and consumers grappling with persistent inflation.

    The president’s contentious relationship with current Fed Chair Jerome Powell has characterized his administration’s approach to central banking. Despite appointing Powell in 2018, Trump repeatedly criticized his leadership, recently labeling him a ‘clown’ with ‘mental problems’ and expressing desire to dismiss him. Legal protections have prevented Powell’s removal without demonstrated cause, compelling Trump to await the conclusion of his term.

    Trump’s dissatisfaction stems from his belief that presidential consultation should guide interest rate decisions. With Americans facing mounting affordability pressures, the president seeks a chair willing to implement immediate rate reductions despite potential long-term inflationary consequences. This stance contradicts established economic principles favoring central bank independence to shield monetary policy from political cycles.

    Historical precedent offers a cautionary tale: President Richard Nixon’s 1970 appointment of Arthur Burns, who acquiesced to presidential pressure for lower rates, contributed to 1970s stagflation featuring 11% inflation and 8.5% unemployment. This crisis ultimately required Paul Volcker’s drastic 19% interest rates in 1980—the ‘Volcker Shock’—to restore price stability at substantial economic cost.

    Among potential nominees, Kevin Hassett emerges as frontrunner given his alignment with Trump’s preference for lower rates and previous service as National Economic Council director. Alternative candidate Kevin Warsh, initially perceived as an inflation hawk, reportedly gained traction after assuring Trump of shared objectives.

    The selection transcends domestic politics, representing a critical test for institutional independence amid executive power consolidation. Global markets and consumers remain apprehensive as Trump’s decision could determine whether economic stewardship prioritizes short-term political gains or long-term stability, with potential stagflation risks evoking historical economic turmoil.

  • Israeli defence minister announces settlement plans in north Gaza

    Israeli defence minister announces settlement plans in north Gaza

    Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Katz has declared intentions to establish new Israeli settlements in northern Gaza, framing the move as a permanent security measure. The announcement came during a ceremony marking the construction of 1,200 housing units in a West Bank settlement, where Katz revealed plans for what he termed “Nahal” settlements to be implemented “when the time is right.”

    Nahal settlements refer to communities historically established by Israeli soldiers. Under international law, all Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories are considered illegal. Katz emphasized Israel’s permanent presence in Gaza, stating, “We are deep inside Gaza and we will never leave all of Gaza – there will be no such thing.” He framed the settlement expansion as protective measures referencing the 21 settlements that existed in Gaza before Israel’s 2005 withdrawal.

    The Defense Minister further asserted Israel’s continued military presence across multiple fronts, noting troops remain positioned in Lebanon, Syria, and the occupied West Bank. “We don’t trust anyone, and no one will come and tell us – there will be no agreement, we won’t move a millimetre in Syria,” Katz declared, characterizing the strategy as creating a barrier between “jihadist enemies and our communities.”

    Far-right settler organizations including the Nachala Settlement Movement and the Yesha Council welcomed the announcement. The Yesha Council stated the move would “make it clear to the enemy that for the massacre of the 7 October, he is paying with land and in perpetuity.” Nachala claimed over 1,000 families stand ready to settle in Gaza immediately, asserting that “The public is ready, the families are ready, and the area is ready.”

    The announcement comes amid escalating ceasefire violations. According to Gaza’s Government Media Office, Israeli forces have committed at least 875 violations since the October ceasefire began. During the 75-day truce period, Israeli operations have resulted in over 411 Palestinian fatalities and 1,112 injuries.

    Humanitarian conditions continue deteriorating as Israel restricts aid delivery. Only 17,819 of 43,800 stipulated aid trucks have entered the blockaded territory, creating severe shortages of shelter, medicine, food, and fuel for Gaza’s two million residents. Health officials report over 62% of essential medicines are unavailable for approximately 250,000 people requiring primary healthcare services.

    The Gaza media office warns of a “deepening and unprecedented humanitarian crisis” exacerbated by freezing temperatures and heavy rainfall, compounding the territory’s dire humanitarian situation.

  • Azerbaijan expresses doubts about joining Gaza international force

    Azerbaijan expresses doubts about joining Gaza international force

    Azerbaijani authorities have articulated significant reservations regarding their potential involvement in an international stabilization force proposed for deployment in Gaza. Hikmet Hajiyev, Foreign Policy Advisor to the President of Azerbaijan, conveyed Baku’s position that participating in the U.S.-negotiated peacekeeping initiative presents substantial challenges, primarily concerning the undefined operational parameters of the mission.

    In detailed comments to international media, Hajiyev confirmed that Washington had formally approached Azerbaijan about contributing to the multinational force. However, he emphasized that “no final decision has been made yet” due to several critical concerns. The senior official highlighted that the United Nations Security Council resolution authorizing the force lacks clarity on fundamental operational details, including rules of engagement, specific action modalities, and the precise scope of the mission’s mandate.

    Azerbaijan’s hesitation stems from both strategic and domestic considerations. Having recently concluded military engagements with neighboring Armenia in 2023, Hajiyev noted that mobilizing additional troops for international deployment would present considerable political challenges in convincing the Azerbaijani public of such a commitment.

    The proposed international force, conceived as part of a broader ceasefire agreement brokered by the United States, would shoulder complex responsibilities including maintaining security in Gaza, overseeing demilitarization efforts, and training Palestinian police forces for future self-governance. Initial American plans aimed to operationalize the force around the beginning of the new year, but implementation has stalled amid various diplomatic complications.

    Multiple regional powers have expressed similar reservations. Jordan’s King Abdullah explicitly stated his nation would not contribute troops to any Gaza force, while Emirati officials similarly indicated participation would be challenging at this time. The exclusion of Turkey from coordination meetings at Israel’s request has further complicated recruitment efforts, reportedly discouraging several potential contributor nations including Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Indonesia.

    Turkish officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, revealed that Ankara maintains an undecided position regarding participation despite having already drafted a military brigade for potential deployment. Insiders suggest that while Turkey could accept non-participation, concerns exist that Hamas’ trust in Turkish mediation might not extend to other nations, potentially undermining the entire stabilization effort. Turkey’s diplomatic influence previously proved instrumental in securing ceasefire agreements between conflicting parties in September.

  • Malawians angry over vice-president’s planned UK trip

    Malawians angry over vice-president’s planned UK trip

    Malawi’s political landscape faces mounting scrutiny as Vice President Jane Ansah prepares for a privately categorized yet state-funded journey to the United Kingdom. The planned fortnight excursion, scheduled to commence on December 26th, has ignited fierce public debate regarding governmental accountability and fiscal responsibility.

    Controversy erupted following the circulation of an allegedly leaked diplomatic correspondence from Foreign Affairs Secretary Chauncy Simwaka to the Malawian High Commission in London. The document outlined a 15-member delegation set to accompany the Vice President, including security personnel, accounting staff, and administrative assistants. Malawian media outlets, citing purported leaked financial records, subsequently reported the expedition would cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    The Vice President’s office has vehemently disputed these allegations. Press Secretary Richard Mveriwa issued an official statement asserting: “These documents did not originate from any government institution and do not reflect official records or approved government expenditures.” While confirming the trip’s occurrence, the administration maintained its commitment to “transparency, accountability, and the responsible use of public resources.”

    Human Rights Defenders Coalition (HRDC), a prominent Malawian civil society organization, has condemned the apparent contradiction between the government’s austerity rhetoric and the Vice President’s travel arrangements. The organization highlighted the administration’s recent pledges to reduce both domestic and international official travel as part of broader cost-cutting measures. HRDC representatives characterized the situation as demonstrating “double standards” wherein ordinary citizens face service reductions while senior officials appear exempt from fiscal discipline.

    The controversy emerges against the backdrop of President Peter Mutharika’s administration, which took office in October following September’s electoral victory. The government had campaigned on promises of economic competence and implemented various austerity measures shortly after assuming power. President Mutharika personally pledged during his inauguration that his administration would not become a “feast” for political elites and their supporters.

    Vice President Ansah, a former Supreme Court justice who previously headed Malawi’s electoral commission, now finds herself at the center of a growing political storm that challenges the government’s credibility in implementing its proclaimed fiscal responsibility agenda.

  • Trump says he’s inviting Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to next year’s G20 summit in Miami

    Trump says he’s inviting Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to next year’s G20 summit in Miami

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — In a strategic diplomatic maneuver, former President Donald Trump has announced plans to extend invitations to Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan for next year’s U.S.-hosted G20 summit. The decision emerged following separate telephone discussions between Trump and Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev and Uzbek leader Shavkat Mirziyoyev on Tuesday.

    This invitation initiative, while not unprecedented for G20 host nations to include non-member states, signals a deliberate effort to strengthen American ties with Central Asian nations. The 2026 gathering is scheduled to occur at Trump’s golf resort in Doral, Florida, near Miami.

    The development follows last month’s Washington summit where leaders from five Central Asian nations—Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan—engaged in substantive talks with Trump. This enhanced engagement reflects the administration’s growing strategic interest in a region possessing substantial mineral reserves, including approximately half of global uranium production and critical rare earth metals essential for advanced technology manufacturing.

    In a significant parallel development, Kazakhstan recently committed to joining the Abraham Accords, the Trump-era initiative normalizing relations between Israel and Muslim-majority nations. This diplomatic alignment occurs alongside controversial exclusionary measures, as Trump simultaneously announced South Africa’s exclusion from the same summit citing disputed treatment of U.S. representatives—a claim strongly rejected by South African authorities.

  • Trump renews call to take over Greenland despite strong objections

    Trump renews call to take over Greenland despite strong objections

    In a move that has reignited international tensions, former U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly reiterated his controversial proposition to annex Greenland, immediately drawing forceful condemnations from Greenlandic, Danish, and European Union leadership.

    Speaking from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Trump framed the potential acquisition as a critical national security imperative, explicitly stating, “We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals.” This assertion directly contradicts previous justifications from his administration, which had cited a combination of Arctic strategic interests, security concerns, and the island’s vast reserves of critical minerals as primary motivations.

    The controversy intensified with Trump’s announcement appointing Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry as a special envoy to Greenland. Landry characterized the role on social media platform X as a voluntary position dedicated to making “Greenland a part of the U.S.” Trump defended the appointment, claiming, “We have to have it and he wanted to lead the charge,” while dismissively questioning Danish sovereignty by asserting they “have spent no money and have no military protection.”

    This political maneuver has triggered a swift and unified diplomatic backlash. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen expressed profound dismay, labeling the envoy’s statements “completely unacceptable” and announcing the summoning of the U.S. Ambassador to Denmark for formal discussions.

    In a powerful joint statement, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen delivered a unequivocal message: “We have said it very clearly before. Now we say it again. You cannot annex other countries. Not even with an argument about international security. Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders.” They emphasized their expectation of respect for their “joint territorial integrity.”

    The European Union reinforced this position through Foreign Affairs spokesperson Anouar El Anouni, who declared that preserving “the territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark, its sovereignty and the inviolability of its borders is essential for the European Union,” confirming the bloc’s longstanding stance on the matter.

    The autonomous territory of Greenland, while self-governing in domestic affairs since 2009, remains under Danish authority regarding foreign, defense, and security policy, making this proposition a direct challenge to established international sovereignty norms.