分类： politics

Diplomatic channels are activating as Denmark confirms an upcoming high-level meeting with United States officials to address President Donald Trump’s renewed interest in establishing American control over Greenland. The strategic Arctic territory, rich in mineral resources and occupying a crucial geopolitical position, has become the focal point of international discussions.

Danish Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen characterized the dialogue as both necessary and requested, telling national broadcaster DR that the Greenlandic government would participate directly. This confirmation follows statements from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who announced the meeting would occur next week without disclosing specific details regarding participants or location.

The principle of “Nothing about Greenland without Greenland” has emerged as a guiding tenet, with Greenland’s Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt emphasizing their requested involvement. This comes amid heightened rhetoric from U.S. Vice President JD Vance, who asserted on Fox News that Denmark has inadequately secured the territory that hosts critical missile defense infrastructure partially dependent on Greenland’s strategic location.

Vance maintained that historical military alliances, including Denmark’s support during World War Two and recent counterterrorism operations, don’t preclude current security concerns. “Just because you did something smart 25 years ago doesn’t mean you can’t do something dumb now,” Vance stated, framing Trump’s position as a clear assessment that Denmark is “not doing a good job with respect to Greenland.”

European leaders have rallied behind Greenland’s sovereignty, with European Council President Antonio Costa declaring “Greenland belongs to its people” and affirming the European Union’s full solidarity. The leaders of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom joined Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen in defending Greenland’s territorial integrity within the NATO alliance.

The diplomatic exchange occurs against the backdrop of existing defense agreements. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen referenced the 1951 defense pact between Denmark and the U.S., noting it offers “ample opportunity for the United States to have a much stronger military presence in Greenland” if desired. Rasmussen documented how the American military footprint has diminished from thousands across 17 bases to approximately 200 personnel at the remote Pituffik Space Base, which supports missile warning and space surveillance operations.

Denmark is simultaneously enhancing its Arctic capabilities through a substantial 14.6 billion-kroner ($2.3 billion) agreement with Greenland and the Faroe Islands to improve regional surveillance and sovereignty maintenance. This initiative includes three new Arctic naval vessels, additional long-range surveillance drones, and enhanced satellite capacity, complementing the existing Joint Arctic Command headquartered in Nuuk and the elite Sirius Dog Sled Patrol that enforces Danish sovereignty in the Arctic wilderness.

A significant geopolitical confrontation is unfolding across the Atlantic as the United States administration renews its strategic interest in Greenland, triggering a firm diplomatic response from European allies. The situation escalated when US Vice-President JD Vance declared the semi-autonomous Danish territory “critical” for global missile defense systems during a Fox News interview, criticizing European nations for their perceived failure to adequately secure the region.

Vance articulated concerns about Greenland’s pivotal role in early warning systems against potential Russian or Chinese missile attacks, stating that European partners “have not done a good job” in maintaining the territory’s defensive capabilities. His comments came alongside White House confirmation that officials are “actively” discussing potential acquisition options for Greenland, including military annexation as a viable alternative.

The Trump administration’s position marks a revival of similar attempts made during the former president’s first term in 2019, though with notably heightened rhetoric following recent military actions in Venezuela. This renewed interest has been met with unequivocal rejection from both Danish and Greenlandic authorities, who have consistently maintained that the island is not available for purchase or transfer.

In a powerful show of European solidarity, leaders from France, the UK, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain joined Denmark in issuing a joint statement affirming that “Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations.” The European leaders emphasized their commitment to Arctic security through NATO collaboration while explicitly invoking the principles of the UN Charter regarding sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Greenland’s political representatives expressed alarm at the American position, with Danish parliament member Aaja Chemnitz characterizing the administration’s comments as “a clear threat” and “completely disrespectful” toward a NATO ally. Meanwhile, local residents like Inuit hunter Aleqatsiaq Peary conveyed indifference toward potential ownership changes, noting that transition from Danish to American control would simply represent “switching from one master to another” for the historically colonial territory.

Beyond military considerations, Greenland’s significance extends to substantial natural resources including rare earth minerals, uranium, and potential oil and gas reserves—assets becoming increasingly accessible due to climate-induced ice melt. The strategic Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base), operational under US control since World War II, further underscores the territory’s enduring importance in global defense architecture.

With US Secretary of State Marco Rubio scheduled to hold talks with Danish officials next week, the diplomatic resolution of this emerging crisis remains uncertain, potentially testing the resilience of transatlantic alliances and established international norms regarding territorial sovereignty.

KASTRO, Greece — Greek agricultural workers intensified their nationwide demonstrations on Thursday by initiating a comprehensive 48-hour blockade of critical highways, major intersections, and toll collection points. This dramatic escalation responds to mounting production expenses and a controversial European Union trade agreement with South American countries under the Mercosur bloc.

Agricultural machinery formed impenetrable barriers along primary transportation corridors, bringing all vehicular movement to a complete standstill while permitting exclusive passage for emergency services. Law enforcement personnel redirected civilian traffic to alternative roadways without attempting to dismantle the protest formations.

The conservative administration in Athens has issued formal warnings against prolonged disruptions of public infrastructure. Multiple segments of Greece’s principal north-south highway linking the capital Athens with Thessaloniki experienced complete bilateral closure as cultivators demanded enhanced governmental assistance and outright rejection of the EU-Mercosur pact.

Yiannis Baritas, a cabbage producer supporting five children, articulated the collective desperation at a southern Greek blockade point: “We’ve encountered an absolute breaking threshold. Our presence here will persist indefinitely to secure our families’ survival. Official policies have driven us to utter despair.”

These agricultural demonstrations originating in November initially focused on inflated operational costs exacerbated by sequential crises: a fraudulent subsidy scheme delaying legitimate compensations and a contagious outbreak of sheep and goat pox.

The government proposed eleventh-hour concessions on Wednesday including reduced electricity tariffs for agricultural consumers and fuel tax reimbursements. Nevertheless, producers deemed these measures insufficient to address structural challenges.

The contested trade agreement would establish an extensive free commerce zone between European and South American economies including Brazil and Argentina. European agriculturalists anticipate market inundation with cheaper imported commodities, sparking parallel protests across multiple EU nations including concurrent demonstrations in France.

Vangelis Roubis, a protest coordinator near Halkida, warned The Associated Press: “Greek agriculture faces extinction if this ratification proceeds. Our national economy relies fundamentally on cultivation and tourism, lacking the industrial capacity of Germany or France. Our production expenditures exceed Latin American costs by 300%.”

Roubis cited potato cultivation as representative: Greek producers require 35-40 cents per kilogram for breakeven operations compared to approximately 10 cents in Brazil. The coordinator concluded: “We demand Greece align with EU member states opposing this agreement.”