作者： admin

BARCELONA, Spain — On the final leg of his week-long official visit to Spain, Pope Leo XIV traveled Thursday to the Canary Islands, a Spanish archipelago off the northwest coast of Africa, to honor a long-held wish of his predecessor Pope Francis and shine a global spotlight on the dangerous journey that hundreds of thousands of migrants undertake each year to reach European shores. Positioned far closer to West Africa than to mainland Spain’s Iberian Peninsula, the Canaries have emerged as one of the most pivotal entry points for irregular migration to the European Union, making it a natural epicenter for debates over migration policy across the continent.

During his two-day visit, the pontiff scheduled a series of engagements: private meetings with migrants who have arrived in the archipelago in recent months, discussions with representatives of Catholic Church outreach groups and humanitarian organizations that provide life-saving aid and integration support for new arrivals, and a solemn commemoration at a site that has become a global symbol of the world’s failure to protect vulnerable migrants: Arguineguin Port, infamously dubbed the “dock of shame” after a 2020 crisis exposed inhumane conditions for displaced people.

In 2020, a sudden spike in migrant crossings to the Canary Islands overwhelmed local authorities, forcing thousands of new arrivals to camp in open-air makeshift facilities on the port’s dock. For weeks, migrants had access only to basic blankets, with no functioning shower facilities, limited access to food and medical care, and no proper legal support for people seeking international asylum. Many were detained far longer than the 3-day maximum detention period permitted under Spanish law, triggering national outcry. Spain’s national ombudsman eventually ordered the camp closed and all migrants relocated, leaving a permanent stain on the country’s immigration policy reputation.

Pope Francis, who centered much of his papacy on upholding the biblical call to “welcome the stranger” and made refugee rights a defining policy priority, had long planned to visit the Canary Islands to stand in solidarity with migrants after the 2020 crisis, but he never had the opportunity to make the trip before stepping down. Pope Leo, the first American pope, has carried forward this commitment, emerging as a vocal critic of hardline migration policies both in his home country, where he has pushed back against former President Donald Trump’s mass deportation crackdown, and across the globe.

Earlier in his Spanish trip, Pope Leo made history by becoming the first pope ever to address the Spanish Parliament, where he delivered a rousing defense of migrant dignity that earned him a seven-minute standing ovation from lawmakers. “The moral greatness of a nation is manifested, above all, in its capacity to accompany, protect and love those lives that are most fragile,” he told the chamber, extending his framing of inherent human dignity to unborn children, the elderly, and people living with terminal illness. Beyond his call for welcome, the pope has pushed for coordinated global action to dismantle human smuggling networks, establish safe, legal migration pathways, and invest in economic development in migrants’ countries of origin to give people the choice to build stable lives at home rather than undertaking dangerous cross-border journeys.

Spain’s current Socialist-led government has carved out a unique stance on migration relative to many other Western nations, bucking the hardline trend that has taken hold across much of Europe and the United States. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has openly defended liberal immigration policies on both humanitarian and economic grounds, pointing to Spain’s rapidly aging population and chronically low birth rate, which have left critical gaps in the national workforce that immigrant workers can fill. Earlier this year, the administration launched an ambitious regularization campaign that will grant legal status to hundreds of thousands of unauthorized migrants currently living and working in the country.

Migrant arrivals to the Canary Islands hit a peak of nearly 47,000 people in 2024, but numbers have dropped dramatically in recent years, with just over 2,000 arrivals recorded in the first four months of 2026. Following his visit to the Canaries, Pope Leo will continue his tour of key migration epicenters next month, when he plans to spend U.S. Independence Day on the Italian island of Lampedusa — another major entry point for migrants crossing from North Africa. The visit will echo Pope Francis’ first official trip outside Rome back in 2013, when he traveled to Lampedusa to toss a wreath into the Mediterranean Sea in honor of thousands of migrants who died attempting the crossing, and coined his iconic phrase decrying the “globalization of indifference” that allows the world to turn a blind eye to migrant suffering.

This coverage from the Associated Press is supported through a collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding provided by Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP retains sole editorial responsibility for all content.

BELFAST, Northern Ireland – A brutal street stabbing committed by an asylum-seeking Sudanese man in Northern Ireland has ignited two consecutive nights of violent, arson-fueled rioting, stoked by preexisting anti-migrant rhetoric that has been spreading across parts of the United Kingdom and Europe. The 30-year-old suspect, Hadi Alodid, made his first court appearance at Belfast Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday, where he faced charges including attempted murder, a separate count of threatening to kill, and illegal possession of a bladed weapon.

According to law enforcement testimony delivered during the hearing, Alodid carried out the attack with a common kitchen knife, leaving his primary victim, Stephen Ogilvie, permanently blinded in the left eye with deep lacerations across the head, face, and back. After the stabbing, while Alodid received medical treatment for a self-inflicted hand wound, he allegedly threatened to kill an attending radiologist. A detective testifying in court shared that Alodid told hospital staff, “I’ve killed someone, I don’t know if they are dead.” To date, investigators have not confirmed a clear motive for the attack, though they have explicitly ruled out terrorism as a driving factor. Alodid declined to secure legal representation through an Arabic interpreter, entered no plea during the Wednesday hearing, and was ordered to remain in custody pending further proceedings.

The first wave of unrest broke out within hours of the attack on Tuesday, when groups of masked rioters took to Belfast’s streets. The mob set fire to multiple residential properties that they claimed housed migrant families, torched a city bus, and launched a barrage of rocks and other projectiles at responding police officers. Firefighters were forced to carry out dramatic rescue operations to pull trapped residents out of burning homes. By the end of the two days of violence, more than 20 local residents had been left homeless, including African migrant communities already settled in the area. Anselme Shima, a Congolese native who has lived in Belfast for nearly a decade, described the chaos as deeply traumatic. “I’ve lived on my street for almost 10 years, I have a good relationship with my neighbors, but last night was a horrific one,” Shima said. “We don’t know what to do. I’m scared. Seeing this, I’m wondering if I’m next.” Police deployed water cannons to disperse the rioters, who tore bricks and stone chunks from local garden walls and patios to hurl at officers.

Senior political leaders from both blocs of Northern Ireland’s power-sharing regional government have unanimously condemned the outbreak of violence. First Minister Michelle O’Neill of the Irish nationalist party Sinn Féin labeled the unrest “thuggery,” echoing widespread cross-party rejection of the rioting.

The current unrest in Belfast mirrors a pattern of anti-migrant violence that has followed recent high-profile stabbing cases across the U.K. over the past two years. Most notably, three young girls were killed in a 2024 stabbing attack at a dance class near Liverpool, which sparked widespread rioting across England and parts of Northern Ireland after false social media claims misidentified the underage suspect as a Muslim asylum seeker. Even after police confirmed the suspect was a British citizen born in Wales, raised by Rwandan Christian parents, violence remained centered on migrant and Muslim communities. The Belfast riots also come just one week after violent clashes between protesters and police in Southampton, which erupted following the sentencing of a man convicted of fatally stabbing university student Henry Nowak.

In the Southampton case, the stabbing, carried out by Vickrum Digwa, exposed deep tensions over policing and immigration. Judge William Mousley found that Digwa, who used an illegal long dagger after initially carrying a traditional Sikh ceremonial knife, misled police by falsely claiming Nowak had attacked him first, resulting in a life prison sentence. Outrage among far-right groups grew after it was revealed that responding officers, called to the scene of a reported racist assault, misidentified Nowak as the perpetrator. Officers dismissed his dying pleas that he had been stabbed and could not breathe, handcuffing him as he lost consciousness. Nigel Farage, leader of the anti-immigration Reform UK party, seized on the case to promote the far-right talking point of “two-tier policing” – the unsubstantiated claim that British policing systems systematically favor ethnic minorities over white residents. While government officials and police leaders have repeatedly denied the existence of such bias, many independent analysts note that multiple major studies, including a 2022 report on London’s Metropolitan Police, the U.K.’s largest force, have confirmed the force is plagued by widespread institutional racism that disadvantages ethnic minority communities.

Far-right and anti-immigration activists across social media have actively organized these post-stabbing protests, with prominent international figures amplifying their rhetoric to stoke division. High-profile far-right British activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known by his pseudonym Tommy Robinson, has been a key voice calling protesters to action. Tech billionaire Elon Musk, owner of the social platform X, has amplified the outrage over Nowak’s killing, posting more than 100 times about the case around the time of Digwa’s trial and offering to fund a private prosecution of the local police force. U.S. Vice President JD Vance also waded into the debate, posting on X that the killing was proof of “the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.” U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer pushed back sharply against these foreign interventions, criticizing outside actors “trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets.”

The unrest in Belfast reflects a broader, years-long surge in anti-immigrant sentiment across the U.K. and much of Western Europe, fueled by ongoing political debates over asylum policy, the steady arrival of asylum seekers via small-boat crossings across the English Channel, and rising public pressure on housing and public services.

Some British anti-immigration political figures have blamed the open border policy between the U.K.’s Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland for allowing Alodid to enter the region. Alodid reportedly traveled from Paris to Dublin before moving north into Northern Ireland, a path made possible by the free movement policy that has been a core pillar of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, the peace deal that ended 30 years of sectarian conflict known as “The Troubles” that killed nearly 3,600 people. “There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this man should not have been in this country,” Farage said Wednesday. “He entered the country illegally. And is it any surprise that people in Belfast and elsewhere are scared?”

GENEVA — Ahead of the upcoming G7 summit set to kick off on Monday near Lake Geneva, French and Swiss law enforcement and border officials are rolling out strict, pandemic-style border controls to counter anticipated large-scale and potentially violent protests against the attending leaders, including former U.S. President Donald Trump. The three-day gathering, which runs from June 15 to 17 in the French lakeside town of Evian-les-Bains, brings together the heads of government from the world’s seven largest advanced economies to deliberate on key global issues ranging from Middle East stability and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine to growing global economic imbalances.

The threat of unrest stems from a long history of disruptive protests at elite global summits, and local stakeholders in nearby Geneva, Switzerland are determined to avoid a repeat of the violent clashes that damaged downtown storefronts during the 2003 G8 summit, when Russia was still a member of the group. This year, a broad coalition of activist groups has organized demonstrations to channel widespread frustration across multiple flashpoints: from Trump’s policy stances on trade tariffs and Middle East conflicts to perceived inaction on climate change, as well as renewed scrutiny of his past ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The coalition of anti-capitalist, environmental, feminist, and progressive activist groups, which brands itself the No G7 coalition, framed the gathering as a meeting of global powers that perpetuates exploitation and inequality. “As the G7 meets in Evian, France, to plan the destruction of peoples, the exploitation of life and the domination of bodies, let us organize our resistance against fascism and imperialism,” the coalition said in an official call for large-scale international protest mobilization. The standoff between authorities and activists centers on competing priorities: the right of demonstrators to gather and voice dissent, and the right of residents and businesses to be protected from damage and unrest targeting symbols of political and corporate power.

In preparation for potential unrest, businesses across central Geneva, a major hub for United Nations and global intergovernmental agencies, have already boarded up their storefronts. Several key institutions, including the World Trade Organization — which was the target of massive anti-globalization protests in Seattle in the 1990s — have closed their downtown offices and ordered all non-essential staff to work remotely for the duration of the summit. While Switzerland is not a G7 member state, the close proximity of Geneva to the summit host town makes it a natural gathering point for traveling activists.

To coordinate security, the two neighboring nations have signed a new military cooperation agreement tailored to the summit. Because Geneva’s main international airport is 95% surrounded by French territory, all arriving G7 leaders will travel through French-controlled airspace and border checks before entering Switzerland. The Swiss federal government confirmed it will deploy roughly 4,000 armed forces personnel to support local police operations, which include sweeping airspace restrictions, floating patrols across Lake Geneva, and targeted closures on cross-border road routes. Only seven of the 35 existing road border crossings between the two countries will remain open for the week, and Geneva officials have permanently closed a major downtown park that activists had selected as their primary protest gathering spot.

On the French side of the border, security will be even more stringent: more than 13,000 police and gendarmerie officers will be deployed to secure the summit perimeter, with 800 dedicated border control officers on duty — a major jump from the 60 officers that work the crossing on a typical day. French authorities have implemented a special resident permit system for Evian, a town best known globally for its branded bottled water, and cordoned off a large secure exclusion zone around the Hotel Royal, where G7 leaders will hold their closed-door meetings. Only one pre-authorized protest march has been approved, scheduled for June 14 ahead of the summit’s official start, and all unapproved public gatherings are banned for the week.

Not all observers agree that the harsh security measures are justified. Cedric Dupont, a professor of international relations at the Geneva Graduate Institute, argues that authorities are overreacting to the protest threat, pointing to widespread economic disruption and long border delays similar to those experienced during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. “It seems that they have not learned the lesson,” Dupont said, noting that protesters can easily enter Geneva from other regions of Switzerland regardless of border restrictions. “It’s just creating more problems than actually solving them.”

The restrictions are already set to upend daily life for cross-border communities. According to the French Foreign Ministry, more than 110,000 commuters cross the France-Switzerland border daily to work in Geneva. French officials have advised all residents to cancel non-essential travel to the region and work from home where possible. Commuter ferry crossings across Lake Geneva that normally stop in Evian have been rerouted to other docks outside the restricted zone, though authorities have confirmed recreational activities such as swimming and paddleboarding will remain permitted in non-restricted areas as the summer tourist season gets underway. To offset expected economic losses for local businesses, the Geneva cantonal government has allocated a 6 million Swiss franc ($7.6 million) compensation fund for any properties damaged during protests. Officials have acknowledged that violent unrest cannot be ruled out entirely, even with the sweeping security measures in place.