作者: admin

  • Beijing to host second World Humanoid Robot Games in August

    Beijing to host second World Humanoid Robot Games in August

    One of the most anticipated international events for cutting-edge humanoid robotics development is set to kick off in Beijing this summer, with the second edition of the World Humanoid Robot Games scheduled to run from August 22 to 26 at the city’s iconic National Speed Skating Oval. This year’s competition will bring together robotic innovations from across the globe to test their capabilities across more than 30 distinct challenges, blending traditional competitive sports, cultural activities, and real-world practical tasks that push the boundaries of current robotic design and intelligence.

    Competitors will face off in a diverse lineup of events, ranging from mainstream athletic challenges such as 100-meter sprinting and weightlifting to team competitions like tug-of-war, even including Touhu, an ancient Chinese precision-targeting game with deep cultural roots. The event is co-organized by four leading institutions: the Beijing municipal government, China Media Group, the World Robot Cooperation Organization, and the RoboCup Asia-Pacific Confederation (RCAP).

    Speaking at an official news conference earlier this week, Jiang Guangzhi, Party secretary and director of the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Economy and Information Technology, outlined the core priorities that set this year’s games apart from previous editions. Organizers have placed a sharp new focus on advancing three critical capabilities for next-generation humanoid robots: greater operational autonomy, improved fine motor dexterity, and enhanced real-world practicality that aligns with industrial and daily use needs.

    Notably, this year’s 100-meter dash competition will operate as a fully autonomous event, marking a key milestone in robotic performance testing. Jiang explained that participating teams are actively encouraged to integrate independent positioning, environmental recognition, and unassisted operation across variable on-course scenarios, removing remote human control to put a robot’s native intelligence to the test.

    Beyond athletic competition, the games will include specialized challenges designed to evaluate a robot’s fine motor skills in everyday and professional contexts. These tasks range from sorting and folding clothing to retail environment food preparation and simulated emergency firefighting operations. By replicating authentic real-world working settings, the competition challenges robots to complete long-range autonomous tasks, allowing judges and researchers to assess core performance metrics including environmental perception, real-time decision-making, and operational precision.

    A key secondary outcome of the event will be the valuable research data it generates for advancing the global humanoid robotics sector. Jiang noted that the competition will introduce first-of-their-kind open robot trials and a public performance leaderboard. All collected data will be shared with the Beijing Humanoid Robot Innovation Center, to support the development of core infrastructure including technology research platforms, open embodied intelligence datasets, mid-stage technology validation frameworks, and cross-sector industry service systems.

    Zhou Changjiu, president of the RCAP, highlighted China’s growing role and unique advantages in advancing global humanoid robot and embodied artificial intelligence development. He noted that China’s extensive range of real-world application scenarios creates unprecedented opportunities for advancing embodied AI research and commercialization. Zhou expressed his expectation that international development teams will leverage these unique conditions to refine cutting-edge algorithms and build practical, real-world ready solutions.

    “This event will do more than showcase the latest robotic innovations,” Zhou said. “It will deepen collaborative ties between global robotics researchers and developers, solidify Beijing’s position as a global leader in embodied AI innovation, and accelerate the formation of a globally influential humanoid robot developer community.”

  • US women to face China, Italy and the Czech Republic in September FIBA World Cup group play

    US women to face China, Italy and the Czech Republic in September FIBA World Cup group play

    As the countdown to September’s 2026 FIBA Women’s Basketball World Cup ticks down, the four-time defending champion United States has learned its path to history: the powerhouse U.S. squad will square off against China, Italy and the Czech Republic in Group D as it chases an unprecedented fifth consecutive World Cup crown.

    Hosted in Berlin from September 4 to 13, this year’s tournament will force the WNBA to pause its regular season for nearly three weeks to allow top American players to compete for their national team, a scheduling adjustment that underscores the global event’s growing prestige. The U.S. women’s program has dominated this competition for nearly 15 years, claiming gold at every World Cup since 2010; their last missed top spot came in 2006, when they walked away with bronze. Most recently, the U.S. defeated China to claim gold at the 2022 tournament hosted in Australia, a rematch that fans could see in this year’s group stage play.

    This year’s tournament marks a historic milestone for women’s basketball: following the runaway success of the 2022 Australia World Cup, organizers have expanded the competing field to 16 teams for the first time since 2018, up from the 12-team format that was used for many years. FIBA Secretary General Andreas Zagklis explained that the expansion is a direct reflection of the rapid growth of the women’s game across the globe. “We just finished qualifiers with 24 teams that had never happened before. We had played before with 16 teams,” Zagklis said. “Women’s basketball has grown a lot and 12 teams didn’t fit the quality we had. Sixteen represents what we believe is today’s standards for our women’s game.”

    The U.S. roster this year is shaping up to be an exciting blend of veteran stardom and emerging young talent. Superstars A’ja Wilson and Breanna Stewart are expected to anchor the squad, while three of the most hyped young players in the women’s game — Caitlin Clark, Paige Bueckers and Angel Reese — are already proven competitors at the international level. The trio helped lead the U.S. to victory at the World Cup qualifying tournament held in Puerto Rico last month, confirming their ability to perform on the global stage.

    Tournament play will follow a clear path to the final: the top team from each of the four groups will earn an automatic spot in the quarterfinals, while the second and third-place finishers from each pool will compete in knockout matches to claim the remaining four quarterfinal berths.

    The full group draw features a range of compelling storylines across all pools. Host nation Germany, which is competing in its first Women’s World Cup since 1998, highlights Group A alongside Spain, Japan and Mali. Group B is headlined by France, which fell to the U.S. in the gold medal match at the 2024 Paris Olympics, and also includes Nigeria, South Korea and Hungary. 2022 host Australia leads Group C, where it will face Belgium, Puerto Rico and Turkey.

  • Takeaways from former top UK official’s testimony on the Mandelson appointment scandal

    Takeaways from former top UK official’s testimony on the Mandelson appointment scandal

    LONDON – A weeks-long political crisis engulfing British Prime Minister Keir Starmer reached a new boiling point this week, after a recently fired top civil servant laid bare explosive behind-the-scenes details of how scandal-plagued politician Peter Mandelson — a known associate of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein — secured the post of UK Ambassador to the United States despite failing official national security vetting.

    Last week, Starmer terminated the employment of Olly Robbins, the former permanent secretary of the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, over Robbins’ central role in approving Mandelson’s nomination even after being notified of formal security concerns. Appearing before Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday, Robbins mounted his public defense, claiming his department had followed all official procedural protocols. But his testimony did little to resolve months of lingering questions about Starmer’s judgment, and instead triggered a fresh wave of cross-party opposition demands for the prime minister to step down.

    This latest controversy comes after Starmer already forced Mandelson to resign from the ambassador post last year, when newly unsealed documents confirmed Mandelson’s ties to Epstein were far closer and more sustained than he had previously disclosed to Downing Street. Even so, the political fallout has continued to build, and Robbins’ opening remarks before the committee delivered new, damaging revelations that cut to the core of Downing Street’s role in rushing the appointment through.

    Robbins told the committee that Starmer’s Downing Street office applied intense, sustained political pressure to cut short the vetting process and install Mandelson in the Washington post as quickly as possible. “There was a very, very strong expectation from Downing Street that Mandelson needed to be in post and in America as quickly as humanly possible,” he told lawmakers. According to Robbins’ account, Mandelson’s appointment was publicly announced in December 2024, and he had already assumed his role, received U.S. government approval for the nomination, and gained access to classified diplomatic briefings more than two full weeks before Robbins took over his role at the Foreign Office — and while the full security vetting process was still incomplete. Most critically, Robbins said Downing Street adopted a deliberately dismissive stance on the vetting process, only caring about how quickly the appointment could be finalized, not whether it was safe to proceed. “There was never any interest, as far as I can recall, in whether, but only an interest in when,” he said.

    The testimony directly contradicts Starmer’s public account of the scandal. The prime minister has claimed he was “furious” to learn last week that the UK’s official national vetting unit had advised against granting Mandelson security clearance, and has argued he fired Robbins for deliberately withholding this critical information from his office.

    But Robbins pushed back against that narrative on Tuesday, telling lawmakers that strict Foreign Office confidentiality rules barred him from sharing the vetting panel’s negative recommendation with the prime minister. He added that the extreme secrecy surrounding the vetting process meant he was never even allowed to view the full panel’s report on Mandelson. UK government protocol requires vetting officials to mark their recommendations on a color-coded form — green for approval, yellow for conditional approval, red for denial — but it remains unclear exactly what risks the panel flagged, or what exact rating the panel assigned to Mandelson. Robbins confirmed he was only briefed verbally that Mandelson was considered a “borderline case” and that the panel was “leaning towards recommending that clearance be denied.” Despite that warning, senior Foreign Office officials ultimately ruled that any identified risks could be sufficiently mitigated to allow the appointment to move forward.

    In one notable clarification that defies widespread public assumptions, Robbins confirmed explicitly that the security concerns flagged during the official vetting process were unrelated to Mandelson’s long-documented ties to Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. The public furor over the appointment first erupted earlier this year, when newly released files from Washington showed Mandelson shared market-sensitive information with Epstein in 2008, when he was serving as UK Business Secretary under the last Labour government.

    While the official vetting concerns did not center on the Epstein ties, a separate civil service due diligence report, released to Parliament last month, did flag broad reputational risks of appointing Mandelson to the sensitive Washington post. That report outlined multiple red flags beyond the Epstein relationship, including questionable business ties to both Russia and China, and the fact that Mandelson was forced to resign from two previous Labour governments over separate ethics and financial scandals. After those details emerged, Starmer apologized publicly, and blamed Mandelson for lying about the true extent of his connections to Epstein.

    Robbins’ testimony has thrown fresh fuel on the fire of the scandal, piling unprecedented new pressure on a already beleaguered Starmer, as opposition leaders reiterate their demands for his resignation. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the opposition Conservative Party, called Robbins’ evidence “devastating to Keir Starmer.” She argued it is “inconceivable” that no senior member of Starmer’s Downing Street staff knew Mandelson had failed the vetting process, and accused the prime minister of deliberately misleading Parliament. “It is clear that No. 10 not only made the appointment before vetting was completed, but that Mandelson was already acting as the ambassador before the vetting, even seeing highly-classified documents. … It is now absolutely clear that ‘full due process’ was not followed,” Badenoch said.

    Public opinion polling has recorded a steady drop in support for Starmer and the Labour Party in recent months, and polling analysts say the latest revelations are likely to cement negative public views of the prime minister’s leadership. Keiran Pedley, politics director at leading polling firm Ipsos, noted that recent attention on Starmer’s response to the Iran-Israel conflict had temporarily quieted discussions about his leadership future, but that the new disclosures from Robbins have revived those questions. The upcoming local elections across England, Scotland and Wales are widely expected to serve as a public referendum on Starmer’s leadership, with pollsters forecasting poor results for Labour that could amplify internal and external pressure for the prime minister to step down.

  • Thai FM reveals ‘Diplomacy 2.0’

    Thai FM reveals ‘Diplomacy 2.0’

    Bangkok, April 21 — Thailand’s newly sworn-in administration has launched a forward-looking overhaul of its foreign affairs strategy, branding the updated framework “Thai Diplomacy 2.0”, which places science, technology and expanded economic partnerships at the center of efforts to advance the Southeast Asian nation’s national interests amid shifting global geopolitical currents. Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow outlined the new approach in his first formal press briefing with reporters, framing the policy as a more proactive, coordinated response to 21st-century global challenges. The new strategy is built around four core principles: policy coherence, clearly defined national objectives, rapid response to developing crises, and expanded engagement with the Thai public, with the media designated a key partner in advancing diplomatic goals. At its core, the policy expands Thailand’s economic diplomacy beyond traditional regional partners, with a deliberate push to open emerging markets outside of Asia. The foreign ministry is already working across government agencies to deepen trade and bilateral cooperation with Central Asian states and member nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council, Sihasak confirmed. Innovation, science and technology will serve as the foundational pillar of this renewed economic diplomacy, he added. To deliver on this priority, the foreign ministry will partner with Thailand’s Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (HESRI) under a unified “Team Thailand” framework that aligns diplomatic, commercial and even national security efforts to protect and promote Thai interests across the globe. Sihasak emphasized that modern foreign policy no longer fits into narrow traditional silos, cutting across overlapping spheres of geopolitics, geo-economics and geo-technology. This interconnected landscape demands far closer inter-agency coordination to boost Thailand’s global competitiveness and strengthen its international economic standing, he said. “This is to advance Thailand’s core interests on the international stage and create meaningful change for the Thai people,” the foreign minister told reporters. HESRI Minister Yodchanan Wongsawat recently laid out three high-priority sectors for the joint science diplomacy strategy: the fast-growing global wellness economy, semiconductor development and artificial intelligence, and environmental and energy technologies tailored to address Thailand’s most pressing domestic challenges, including toxic air pollution and long-term energy security. Yodchanan noted that the unified framework will create clear structure for scientific research and commercialize outcomes, with the ultimate goal of lifting Thai livelihoods through targeted technological advancement. Beyond economic and scientific priorities, Sihasak addressed the most pressing geopolitical challenges facing the new administration, starting with the long-running border dispute between Thailand and neighboring Cambodia. With the rules-based international order facing growing global pressure, the foreign minister stressed that bilateral dialogue and mutual cooperation are the only path forward, calling for a fresh start to cross-border relations. “Efforts must focus on moving and turning a ‘new page’ of relations with Cambodia to restore sustainable peace along the border. Rather than exerting pressure on Thailand, Cambodia must demonstrate genuine readiness and sincerity in cooperating with Thailand,” he said. Turning to the ongoing Middle East crisis, Sihasak said Thailand will maintain a careful, strategic positioning that prioritizes the safety of Thai nationals working in the region while ensuring unimpeded passage of essential goods through critical global trade routes. “What I have stated all along is clear — we do not support this war. It should not have happened in the first place,” he said. Looking ahead to long-term strategic priorities, Sihasak reaffirmed that Thailand’s foreign policy will always center national interests, above all territorial and human security. He highlighted the critical importance of securing Thailand’s border regions and deepening practical regional cooperation with neighboring Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos and Malaysia. Amid intensifying great power competition that has divided many regional nations, Sihasak said Thailand advocates for a multi-polar regional order anchored by a strong, unified Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Thailand will maintain its long-held strategic autonomy, he emphasized, declining to take sides in competing global power blocs. “We have to know where our interests lie. We must not be too much, and we must not be too little. We must be just right,” he said.

  • When the map turns red: Inside the lives upended by Israel’s expulsion orders

    When the map turns red: Inside the lives upended by Israel’s expulsion orders

    On the morning of September 27, 2024, a new chapter of crisis opened for Lebanese civilians when the Israeli military began distributing digital warnings ordering residents to abandon their homes across wide swathes of the country. Within seconds of these alerts circulating via WhatsApp groups — marked with red highlights pinning targeted buildings, streets, and entire districts — panic spread. People crowded over their phone screens to identify local landmarks, narrow roadways quickly became choked with idling cars, and families poured into the streets, clutching small children and supporting elderly relatives to escape. In some residential areas, warnings landed mid-school day: administrators rushed students out onto sidewalks, where tearful children waited alone, stranded as their parents fought through gridlocked traffic to reach them.

    This pattern of sudden, short-notice expulsion orders paired with immediate airstrikes has become a devastating routine for Lebanese communities in the months following an initial 2024 ceasefire that paused two months of open conflict between Israel and Lebanon. By March 2025, four months after that truce took hold, these warnings still upend lives without warning.

    Twenty-nine-year-old Sarah, a resident of Lebanon’s south Beirut suburb of Dahieh, was preparing iftar at her parents’ Jamous Street home when an Israeli expulsion order popped up in her family’s WhatsApp group. Her young son was playing with a toy car in her childhood bedroom when the alert came, distributed by the Israeli military’s Arabic spokesperson on X without any clear timeframe for evacuation. “We didn’t know how much time we had,” Sarah recalled from Majdal Selem in south Lebanon. “The second I saw the map, I knew it was our building.” She grabbed her son, leaving his shoes behind, and ran out the door without grabbing even her purse or any personal belongings. By the time she reached the street, the entire neighborhood was in chaos: blocked roads, panicked residents fleeing in every direction, and nearby schools already emptied of students. “There were people who weren’t able to escape in time, and they were stuck in the area,” Sarah said. “The area wasn’t emptied in that time; it is not realistic. It is very crowded and densely populated. How could you empty it in two hours?”

    Sarah fled to her brother’s home in the mountains, where her mother 60-year-old Fatima arrived minutes after fleeing her office. When Fatima walked through the door, she turned straight to the news — and watched her lifelong home reduced to rubble in an Israeli airstrike. The home she had owned for 30 years, the first property she and her late husband had built together after decades of renting, was gone. She had designed every detail: added a custom sitting nook to the kitchen, filled the space with plants, painted custom doors, bottles, and furniture. A second-floor room housed 5,000 books, doubled as her art studio, and held her late poet husband’s un digitized handwritten manuscripts. A cabinet preserved the belongings of their son, killed by Israel in 2008 while working as a paramedic in south Lebanon: his work suit, watch, favorite fragrance, and nursing certificate. “These things will never be compensated,” Fatima said. “They will never come back to life and touch this wall, or this table.” All 100 of her completed artworks were destroyed in the strike.

    Clinical psychologist and psychotherapist Elie Abou Chacra frames this sudden loss of home and irreplaceable personal mementos as a profound psychological rupture. “The home is not just a place. It is part of the psychological system. It holds memory, routine, and a sense of control,” he explained. When an evacuation warning lands, the human brain immediately shifts to survival mode: time compresses, every decision becomes instinctive, and choosing what to save and what to leave becomes an impossible, traumatic calculation. For objects tied to lost loved ones, he added, losing these emotional anchors can feel like grieving the person all over again. Watching the destruction unfold in real time via phone or television screens deepens this harm, he noted: “The brain processes it as it is happening in the moment. It closes the door to hope instantly.”

    For many Lebanese civilians, the destruction comes even after they believed they had survived the worst of the conflict. In 2024, 29-year-old Nour and her husband Mohammad purchased a $115,000 flat in Haret Hreik, another Dahieh neighborhood, and invested an additional $55,000 to fully renovate the space from the ground up, updating wiring, plumbing, and interiors. “I kept reminding myself that I’m doing this once in my lifetime,” Mohammad said. The couple moved in by June 2024, but were forced to flee almost immediately when the 2024–2025 war broke out. Their expulsion order arrived on November 25, 2025 — one day before a planned ceasefire — while the couple was visiting Iraq. At first, Nour thought her brother-in-law’s news that their home was targeted was a joke. Two hours later, her father called to confirm the strike, and video of the destroyed flat flooded in. “I felt a deep, heavy helplessness when I was watching the videos,” Nour said. “We didn’t even get to enjoy it.” Beyond the crippling financial blow — Mohammad still pays off loans for a home that no longer exists — Nour lost irreplaceable personal heirlooms: her late mother’s clothing, her high school uniform signed by classmates, handwritten notes from friends. “If I were there, what would I have saved?” she paused. “Nothing. It’s either everything or nothing.”

    As conflict resumed after the fragile ceasefire, Israeli evacuation warnings expanded from targeting individual buildings to entire neighborhoods and districts. According to United Nations figures, roughly 20 percent of Lebanon’s total population has been displaced, with expulsion orders covering approximately a quarter of the country’s entire territory. On March 5, 2026, Israel issued its first mass evacuation order, covering 12 neighborhoods across large parts of Beirut and ordering hundreds of thousands of civilians to flee within hours. Entire districts emptied onto a single highway, leaving widespread chaos in their wake. That same day, 36-year-old Naima lost the six-year-old skincare clinic she owned in Dahieh’s Centre Tayyar, a building that housed 90 small clinics and businesses. “I spent more time there than at my home,” she said. “I cried for a few minutes. Then I prayed and told myself: people are losing their lives.”

    Official data from Lebanon’s National Council for Scientific Research confirms the scale of destruction: since March 2, 2026, more than 40,000 housing units have been partially or completely destroyed by Israeli strikes. On some days, over 1,000 homes are damaged or flattened, leveling entire neighborhoods. Widely circulated Israeli drone footage shows entire villages in south Lebanon being demolished in controlled explosions, with residents scrambling to identify their own homes in the clips. Some pay up to $200 for commercial satellite imagery just to confirm if any part of their property survived.

    Brigadier General Khaled Hamadeh, a political affairs researcher, classifies these mass expulsion warnings as a deliberate new form of psychological warfare targeting civilian populations. “What began as alerts for individual buildings expanded into mass displacement orders,” he noted. Over time, civilians have adapted in small, painful ways: they keep valuables packed, essentials ready, and structure their daily lives around waiting for the next alert. “The warnings shape how civilians behave, when they leave, when they return, and how they live,” Hamadeh explained.

    While international humanitarian law requires advance warnings before attacks that may put civilians at risk, legal experts note these requirements mandate specific, timely notices that allow for safe evacuation. Blanket warnings covering entire populated districts have raised questions about whether Israel is attempting to redraw Lebanon’s demographic map through forced displacement. A 2026 investigation by Amnesty International found that many Israeli warnings in Lebanon are “inadequate, ineffective or misleading”, failing to give civilians a realistic opportunity to escape. On the ground, the core question for ordinary people remains unanswerable: how do you pack up an entire lifetime in a matter of minutes?

    Hamadeh adds that Lebanon’s lack of a formal national early warning or civil defense alert system leaves civilians with no alternative but to rely on warnings from the attacking military itself, eliminating any state mediation and leaving communities completely disoriented. “In the moment, you have to decide which item deserves to survive,” Sarah said.

    Expulsion orders have fundamentally reshaped daily life across most of Lebanon, dictating when work ends, when schools close, and when families are forced to scatter. For Fatima, the trauma of loss did not end when her home turned to rubble. After the strike, she rented a new flat in Dahieh, and faced an impossible choice: treat it as a temporary stopgap, or build a new life there. She chose to invest fully, to push back against the pressure of displacement. “I decided to invest in it as if I am going to live there forever,” she said. “To show Israel that we are strong and their strategies will never weaken us.”

    Her new home survived the latest round of conflict, with only a few broken window panes. Even when displaced again, Fatima has not stopped creating art. She bought new brushes, new paints, and new canvases, and continues to paint, even when she cannot sell her work because pieces are often left behind in destroyed homes. She still centers her work on flowers. “If I don’t see a flower during the day,” she said, “I’d die.”

    This reporting was originally published by Middle East Eye, an independent outlet covering the Middle East, North Africa and global affairs.

  • Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ held talks with DP World over Gaza reconstruction

    Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ held talks with DP World over Gaza reconstruction

    Plans to rebuild the war-ravaged Gaza Strip have moved forward with behind-the-scenes discussions between a US-led reconstruction body and one of the world’s largest port and logistics operators, multiple sources familiar with the negotiations have confirmed to the Financial Times. The talks center on a potential role for DP World, the Dubai-state-owned multinational logistics firm, in overhauling Gaza’s access to critical supplies and long-term economic development, as Donald Trump’s controversial post-conflict vision for the enclave begins to take tangible shape.

    The Trump administration’s so-called Board of Peace, a Washington-aligned body launched in January to coordinate Gaza reconstruction, has held multiple communications with DP World representatives about a range of potential projects. The core proposal under discussion would task DP World with overseeing end-to-end supply chain management for humanitarian aid and commercial goods entering the blockaded territory. This includes planning for on-the-ground warehousing infrastructure, digital cargo tracking systems, and coordinated security arrangements for incoming shipments, the insiders say.

    Negotiations have also explored larger, long-term infrastructure projects: options include constructing a new deep-water port either within Gaza’s territorial boundaries or along the adjacent Egyptian coastline, plus the development of a dedicated free trade zone within Gaza to drive private sector growth. A draft proposal reviewed by the FT outlines DP World delivering a “secure and traceable supply chain system”, a “port-led economic ecosystem”, and “employment-generating trade platforms” for the war-shattered enclave, where 70% of infrastructure has been destroyed by Israel’s military campaign.

    This initiative aligns with long-stated priorities from Trump, who has repeatedly pushed for large-scale privatized redevelopment of Gaza in the wake of Israel’s military campaign. The former president turned current US leader has publicly shared AI-generated conceptual media depicting his vision for a “Gaza Riviera”, a proposal that sparked widespread outrage and mockery from Palestinian leadership, who argue the plan sidelined Palestinian sovereignty over their own territory.

    The Board of Peace, which consists of heads of state aligned with US foreign policy in the Middle East, has faced widespread global pushback since its launch. Most of the world’s national governments have refused to join the body, with critics arguing it deliberately undermines the United Nations’ long-standing central role in governance and humanitarian coordination in the occupied Palestinian territories.

    Insiders familiar with the talks emphasize that current entry arrangements for aid into Gaza are functionally unworkable for large-scale reconstruction. “You can’t rebuild Gaza like in their vision with 1,500 trucks a week being moved back-to-back through Israeli crossings,” one source told the FT. “You need bigger, more efficient and less bureaucratic entryways. Right now it’s like working through a straw.”

    In a statement to the Financial Times, a Board of Peace spokesperson confirmed the outreach process, saying: “We are speaking to multiple potential partners across multiple lines of effort. We are conducting… market research focused on how to identify best-in-class operators and next-gen solutions.”

    Any deal with DP World carries notable reputational and financial risks for all involved, however. The firm has been mired in controversy in recent months over long-concealed ties to disgraced convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Earlier this year, the company’s chairman stepped down after public revelations of his connections to Epstein, and a string of major international backers have suspended new investments. Thousands of emails exchanged between DP World CEO Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem and Epstein were uncovered earlier this year, prompting investment firms in both the United Kingdom and Canada to halt future commitments to the company.

    Quebec’s La Caisse pension fund, one of DP World’s largest financial partners that holds a 45% stake in DP World Canada, announced it would pause all new investments until the company implements targeted governance reforms. British International Investment, the UK government’s foreign development arm that co-owns the Berbera Port in Somaliland alongside DP World, followed suit with its own pause on new capital commitments. DP World remains fully owned by a Dubai government holding company, and the firm contributes more than 36% of Dubai’s total GDP and roughly 12% of the United Arab Emirates’ overall national output, according to the company’s public data.

    The push for new infrastructure comes amid a persistent crisis for humanitarian aid operations in Gaza, even as Israel has rolled back some restrictive measures. Earlier this year, the Israeli Supreme Court ordered a freeze on a government ban targeting dozens of international aid groups, but the sector still faces crippling barriers to entry. The Israeli government had imposed strict new regulations requiring 37 nongovernmental organizations to turn over extensive personal information on all their Palestinian staff to continue operating. Alan Moseley, country director for the Danish Refugee Council in occupied Palestine, told AFP that both international staff and critical aid supplies continue to be blocked from entry. “Staff continued to be rejected, supplies continued to be rejected,” Moseley said, adding that almost no affected aid organizations have been able to deliver meaningful amounts of aid into Gaza over recent months.

  • Mauritania lawmakers are charged with insulting president over racial bias claims

    Mauritania lawmakers are charged with insulting president over racial bias claims

    In the capital city of Nouakchott, Mauritania, a high-stakes political conflict has erupted after two female opposition parliamentarians were formally hit with multiple criminal charges, stemming from public accusations that President Mohamed Ould Ghazouani holds discriminatory views against Black Mauritanians and people born to former slave families.

    According to the country’s top prosecutor, the charges, formally filed Monday, extend far beyond the initial allegation of insulting the head of state. The two lawmakers — Marieme Cheikh Dieng and Ghamou Achour — also face accusations of inciting sectarian violence, undermining national state symbols, and organizing unlawful gatherings through social media platforms that are alleged to threaten domestic public security.

    The pair had been held in police custody for more than 10 days following their critical social media posts targeting Ghazouani. Both politicians are affiliated with the Initiative for the Resurgence of the Abolitionist Movement (IRA), an anti-slavery coalition that holds unregistered political status and ran its candidates in alliance with the formally registered Sawab party to secure their parliamentary seats.

    The issue of slavery and systemic discrimination against descendants of enslaved people remains one of the most divisive and sensitive political topics in Mauritania, decades after the practice was formally outlawed by the state. Biram Dah Abeid, founder and leader of the IRA coalition, has condemned the prosecutions as a targeted political witch hunt, noting that both lawmakers themselves are descendants of former slaves. He argues the charges are a deliberate attempt to silence opposition voices that challenge the government’s ongoing failure to address systemic inequality.

    Prosecutors have argued that the severity of the charges strips the two elected officials of their constitutionally protected parliamentary immunity, clearing the way for the criminal case to move forward. But legal representatives for Dieng and Achour have rejected this legal reasoning outright, claiming the entire prosecution is nothing more than a political reprisal to settle partisan scores with government opponents.

  • Exclusive: Inside Hezbollah’s battle for Bint Jbeil and Khiam

    Exclusive: Inside Hezbollah’s battle for Bint Jbeil and Khiam

    For weeks, Israeli military forces carried out sustained bombardment on two southern Lebanese towns, Bint Jbeil and Khiam, launching repeated attempts to encircle the heavily symbolic and strategically critical settlements. As of the post-ceasefire assessment, neither town has fully fallen under Israeli occupation, a development that lays bare the distinct limitations of Israeli firepower in southern Lebanon and the inherent advantages that local terrain delivers to defensive forces, according to three sources close to Hezbollah speaking to Middle East Eye. One of the three sources has direct, firsthand knowledge of frontline combat operations in the region.

    The sources explain that Israeli ground advances were stalled not only by fierce organized armed resistance from Hezbollah, but also by the challenging physical landscape of southern Lebanon, the unique difficulties of urban combat, and the outsized political and military significance Israel itself assigned to these two targets. For Israeli military planners, the core objective was never simply to advance into the towns: it was to fully secure Bint Jbeil, Khiam and the surrounding areas to solidify control over Israel’s northern border with Lebanon. This failure to achieve that core goal raises major questions about the viability of any long-term Israeli military presence in southern Lebanon, and it also explains why Israel has continued to demolish civilian structures in areas it partially controls even after the April 15 ceasefire took effect, with the military actively broadcasting footage of this destruction across social media platforms.

    For Israeli leadership, Bint Jbeil has loomed as a particularly charged objective for decades. “At every round of fighting, there has always been the question of Bint Jbeil for the Israelis,” one Hezbollah-aligned source explained. “The city has haunted the Israelis and created some sort of PTSD.” This outsized symbolism dates back to May 2000, when Hezbollah’s late secretary-general Hassan Nasrallah delivered his iconic speech in Bint Jbeil immediately after Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon, famously describing Israel as “weaker than a spider’s web”. The town was already a decisive battleground in the 2006 Israel-Lebanon war, where Hezbollah secured a widely recognized victory, making it a top priority target in the 2026 offensive.

    In this latest conflict, Israeli operational objectives shifted significantly from the 2006 war. Initially, military planners set a broad goal: to isolate the entire Bint Jbeil district by seizing control of all key access routes, cutting off the town from surrounding settlements including Qawzah, Wadi al-Oyoun, Haddatha, Aitaroun, Wadi al-Skikiyyeh and Wadi al-Slouqi. Had this plan succeeded, it would have fully cut Bint Jbeil off from reinforcements and laid the groundwork for a long-term Israeli occupation of the area. But every Israeli attempt to achieve this encirclement failed, in large part because Hezbollah had studied Israeli tactics used in the Gaza Strip and prepared comprehensive countermeasures, the sources confirmed. Faced with this setback, Israeli commanders narrowed their operational scope, scaling back ambitions from isolating an entire district to besieging the core town of Bint Jbeil alone – a shift that represented a clear downgrading of strategic goals, moving from controlling open terrain to targeting a dense urban center that could be framed as a visible public relations victory.

    For Hezbollah, the failure of Israel’s initial encirclement plan counts as a major battlefield success. “Everything the Israelis claimed about enforcing a total siege on the town was inaccurate,” a second source noted. “There was pressure from several directions, yes, but even in the final moments, supplies and ammunition were still reaching us through the surrounding axes. Bint Jbeil remained an operations hub from which attacks were launched into other areas. No force in the world can impose a total siege on our terrain in this area.”

    Geographically, Bint Jbeil sits at the core of a strategic puzzle Israeli forces could not solve. The current conflict expanded to Lebanon in early March, after Hezbollah launched rocket fire in response to the killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, pre-empting an Israeli invasion the group assessed was imminent. Israeli forces advanced into southern Lebanon from both eastern and western axes, pushing roughly 10 kilometers into Lebanese territory. To establish a continuous, stable controlled zone along the border, Israeli forces needed to link these two advance axes horizontally – a maneuver that required full control of Bint Jbeil. Without the town, the eastern and western sectors of the advance remain disconnected, leaving Israeli troops vulnerable as isolated pockets rather than forming a coherent defensive strip along the border.

    After the failure of the district-wide encirclement, Israeli forces launched a four-pronged advance on the town itself, moving in from Ain Ebel, Saf al-Hawa, Yaroun and Maroun al-Ras. Even then, Israeli forces never managed to secure full control of the urban center. According to the sources, the Israeli advance relied on limited, incremental incursions, booby-trapping abandoned buildings and burning structures on the town’s outskirts. The military also deployed remotely operated unmanned trucks packed with explosives, a tactic first honed in Gaza City, designed to draw Hezbollah fighters into open combat before detonating to destroy entire neighborhoods. This cautious approach, the sources argue, reflects a deliberate Israeli choice to avoid the heavy casualties that would come from direct close-quarters combat.

    To date, Israeli forces have failed to establish permanent, secured positions inside the town core. Key symbolic landmarks, including the “spider’s web” stadium where Nasrallah delivered his 2000 victory speech, the central grand mosque, and major religious compounds, all remain under Hezbollah control. Israeli troops never reached the town center, nor have they been able to eliminate Hezbollah’s fighting presence inside the settlement. The sources attribute this defensive success to years of intensive pre-conflict battlefield preparation by Hezbollah. “To illustrate the level of preparation with which the party fought in Bint Jbeil, the Hezbollah units inside the city twice attempted to kill the Israeli commander of the 52nd Battalion of the 401st Brigade by targeting his tank,” the second source said. “He survived both times by a miracle and is now in intensive care.” The fact that Hezbollah was able to identify the specific battalion and its commanding officer in advance demonstrates how thoroughly the group had studied Israeli order of battle ahead of the offensive, the source added.

    The sources also detailed one incident in Bint Jbeil’s al-Awini neighbourhood where the Israeli military activated the Hannibal Directive, a policy that orders heavy bombardment of an area where soldiers are at risk of capture to prevent them being taken alive. “After it lost contact with its soldiers, it began shelling within roughly 20 metres of their position, before eventually managing to retrieve them,” the source recalled. “We knew that any attempt to capture them would prompt it to shell both its own soldiers and ours.” Middle East Eye has requested comment from the Israeli military on the claims outlined in this report.

    The narrative of Israeli strategic failure holds equally true for Khiam, the second key southern Lebanese town. While Bint Jbeil serves as the critical link connecting Israel’s eastern and western advance axes, Khiam functions as a strategic gateway to inland Lebanese territory. Like Bint Jbeil, Khiam carries deep symbolic weight: it was the site of a notorious Israeli-backed prison during the 1982-2000 occupation, where hundreds of detainees faced systematic abuse and torture. To date, Israeli forces have failed to bypass Khiam, fully encircle the town, or seize control of its northern side. Hezbollah’s supply lines from the western Bekaa Valley have remained fully operational throughout the offensive, blocking Israeli forces from pushing further inland and derailing all plans to establish a stable controlled buffer zone along the border.

    The three Hezbollah-aligned sources argue that Israel’s repeated failures to seize full control of Bint Jbeil and Khiam point to broader strategic challenges: even a shallow buffer zone of less than 10 kilometers in southern Lebanon will be extremely difficult for Israel to sustain. Without full control of these two key settlements, Israeli advances into Lebanon are capped in depth, leaving Israeli troops with disconnected, vulnerable outposts, unsecured urban areas behind their lines, and intact Hezbollah supply routes that keep resistance forces supplied and reinforced.

    The sources acknowledge that Israel has made limited territorial gains during the offensive and has killed a large number of Hezbollah fighters, but they argue these gains have not added up to the sustainable, cohesive area of control Israel set out to achieve. The second source noted that Israel intentionally inflated the strategic importance of the battle for Bint Jbeil ahead of the offensive, a public relations gambit to frame any seizure of the town as a transformative victory. “The Israelis deliberately inflated the importance of this battle so that, if they succeeded in taking the city, it could be presented as proof of achievement,” he explained.

    As evidence that Hezbollah’s defensive capabilities remain intact, the source pointed to an ambush carried out by the group’s elite Radwan force against Israel’s Battalion 101, carried out shortly before the April 15 ceasefire took effect. “Within minutes, three Hezbollah fighters managed to hit 10 paratroopers, leaving them dead or wounded,” he said. The incident underscores Hezbollah’s approach to the conflict: it is not merely a static defense of fixed territory, but a sustained contest of endurance, mobility, and preventing Israel from securing the decisive symbolic victory it sought to cement its strategic goals.

  • Beijing intellectual property court highlights landmark cases to bolster tech innovation

    Beijing intellectual property court highlights landmark cases to bolster tech innovation

    On April 21, 2026, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court held a press conference to publicly release details of 10 landmark intellectual property (IP) cases, reaffirming its commitment to strengthening legal safeguards for cutting-edge technological development via optimized judicial frameworks.

    Official data from the court shows that in 2025 alone, the institution processed and closed nearly 29,000 IP-related disputes. Beyond resolving conflicts, these rulings have strengthened IP protection for core technologies in both key strategic sectors and fast-growing emerging industries, while setting clear judicial precedents to address novel legal challenges that have arisen alongside rapid industrial transformation.

    Song Yushui, vice-president of the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, told reporters that the court has established dedicated specialized trial teams to handle IP cases across high-priority fields including pharmaceuticals, digital data and agricultural seed technology. These teams center their work on untangling complex legal issues in rapidly evolving sectors such as artificial intelligence (AI), biomedicine, the digital platform economy, cultural creative industries, and IP-related anti-monopoly enforcement.

    Song emphasized that the 10 selected cases showcase the court’s targeted efforts to fill existing gaps in industry regulatory frameworks, refine industry-specific legal standards, clarify the boundaries of IP rights, standardize competitive conduct in relevant markets, optimize the business environment for IP-focused innovation, and underpin China’s high-standard opening-up of its economy to global partners.

    Among the 10 cases, one particularly notable ruling stands out as one of China’s first judicial decisions on protecting AI model structures and core parameters. In that case, the court determined that the competitive advantage derived from AI model structures and parameters, which are developed through massive resource investment in data training and iterative refinement, constitutes a legally protectable interest. This means such core R&D outcomes cannot be copied or exploited without explicit permission from the rights holder.

    Song noted that this groundbreaking ruling fills a long-existing regulatory gap in the legal protection of core AI innovation outcomes, establishes a clear, structured judicial protection framework for core AI assets, and creates a more supportive legal environment for the standardized and innovative development of China’s AI industry.

  • Robot chases wild boars off the streets of Warsaw

    Robot chases wild boars off the streets of Warsaw

    The capital city of Poland, Warsaw, is facing an unprecedented urban wildlife challenge, as the number of wild boars wandering its public streets has skyrocketed over the past four years. Official estimates put the current urban wild boar population at more than 3,000 individuals, marking a dramatic twenty-fold increase compared to figures recorded in 2020. This rapid population growth has pushed local authorities to explore innovative, non-lethal methods to manage the conflict between humans and wildlife, and one of the most unique approaches currently being tested is the use of specialized robots to herd wild boars away from populated residential and commercial areas. Urban wild boars have become a growing nuisance for Warsaw residents in recent years: the animals often dig through garbage bins, damage public and private green spaces, and pose potential traffic safety risks when they wander onto busy roads. Traditional population control methods, such as culling, have faced widespread pushback from animal welfare advocates and city residents, prompting officials to test technological alternatives that can safely move the animals out of urban centers and into surrounding natural habitats. The robotic deterrent system is designed to gently harass and guide wild boars away from developed areas without causing harm to the animals, offering a middle ground between public safety concerns and animal protection principles. As urban wildlife populations continue to grow across many European capitals, Warsaw’s experiment with robotic wildlife management is being closely watched as a potential model for other cities grappling with similar human-wildlife coexistence challenges.