作者: admin

  • Chinese foreign minister and Thai prime minister agree to collaborate on fighting cyberscams

    Chinese foreign minister and Thai prime minister agree to collaborate on fighting cyberscams

    BANGKOK – On a regional diplomatic tour aimed at deepening bilateral ties across Southeast Asia, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi held official talks with Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul in Bangkok on Friday, centered on elevating the long-standing strategic partnership between the two nations and expanding cross-sector collaboration.

    Following the closed-door meeting, Thai government spokesperson Rachada Dhnadirek confirmed that the two leaders reached a clear consensus to strengthen joint action against transnational criminal networks, with a specific focus on combating cyberscams, alongside advancing cooperation in other key priority areas. In the meeting, Anutin expressed sincere gratitude to Beijing for its consistent support of Thailand amid regional and global challenges, while Wang extended congratulations to the prime minister on retaining his cabinet position following Thailand’s recent general election. Wang also underscored his firm confidence that the Thailand-China relationship will continue to gain momentum and deepen in the coming years, according to the spokesperson.

    The meeting kicked off with a formal greeting at Bangkok’s Government House, where the two leaders shook hands and posed for official photos before entering discussions. Ahead of his talks with Anutin, Wang had already held productive working sessions with his Thai counterpart, Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow, government officials confirmed.

    Wang’s three-day visit to Thailand began Thursday, coming directly after a series of high-level meetings with Cambodian government officials in Phnom Penh. That stop focused on strengthening political and security cooperation between China and Cambodia, wrapping up successfully before Wang traveled onward to Thailand. Per the official schedule released by the Chinese Foreign Ministry, Myanmar will be the next stop on Wang’s Southeast Asian diplomatic tour after he concludes his engagements in Thailand.

    The diplomatic engagement builds on a deepening foundation of ties between Beijing and Bangkok: China has held the position of Thailand’s largest trading partner for years, and the two nations marked the 50th anniversary of the establishment of formal diplomatic relations in 2023, a milestone that included an unprecedented historic visit to China by Thailand’s reigning monarch, King Maha Vajiralongkorn, last November. In recent years, Chinese direct investment into Thailand has also grown at an accelerated pace, a trend partially driven by a broader shift of Chinese manufacturing operations into Southeast Asia as companies seek to mitigate the impact of United States tariffs on Chinese-made goods.

  • Ten photos from across China: April 17 – 23

    Ten photos from across China: April 17 – 23

    Every week, a curated collection of photojournalism from across China offers a window into the diverse cultural, social and economic moments shaping the world’s most populous nation. For the period spanning April 17 to 23, 2026, China Daily has released its weekly roundup of 10 striking images, offering audiences a visual tour of events unfolding across the country.

    The first image released as part of this weekly collection captures a vibrant cultural celebration unfolding in the southern regional capital of Nanning, located in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Dated April 18, 2026, the photograph captures a group of Dong ethnic minority performers mid-performance: the artists blend vocal harmony with the gentle melodies of the pipa, China’s centuries-old traditional four-stringed lute, during the official opening ceremony for a multi-event series marking the annual Sanyuesan Festival.

    One of the most widely celebrated traditional cultural observances across southern China’s many ethnic minority communities, Sanyuesan — which translates directly to “Third Day of the Third Lunar Month” — is a centuries-old holiday that honors ancestral traditions, fosters intercultural connection, and showcases the unique artistic heritage of China’s 55 officially recognized ethnic minority groups. The image, captured by photojournalist Zou Hong for China Daily, highlights the ongoing vitality of traditional folk performance in modern China, as communities gather to celebrate their shared cultural identity.

    This weekly photo roundup is just the first of 10 curated images documenting moments across the entire country, ranging from infrastructure milestones to community events and natural landscapes, with the full set available to view via China Daily’s official digital platform, chinadaily.com.cn. The collection was updated and published to the platform at 6:40 a.m. Beijing Time on April 24, 2026, making the visual reporting accessible to global audiences within 24 hours of the final event in the weekly coverage window.

  • Aboriginal children’s book pulled over illustrator’s Bondi attack comments

    Aboriginal children’s book pulled over illustrator’s Bondi attack comments

    A controversial decision by one of Australia’s most established publishing houses to scrap a printed Indigenous children’s book has ignited fierce national debate over free speech, antisemitism, and political censorship, with dozens of prominent authors severing ties in protest.

    The canceled work, *Bila, A River Cycle*, was written by award-winning Wiradjuri poet Jazz Money and illustrated by Melbourne-based artist Matt Chun. Thousands of copies of the book had already gone to press before the publisher, University of Queensland Press (UQP), announced it would halt distribution and explore recycling options for the entire print run, currently held in storage.

    The cancellation came in response to public comments Chun made in a Substack essay published earlier this year, where he reflected on public and media reactions to the December 2024 Bondi beach shooting. In that attack, two gunmen opened fire on a Jewish festival hosted at the iconic Sydney beach, killing 15 people including prominent Chabad rabbi Eli Schlanger, head of the local Chabad mission which organized the gathering.

    In his essay, Chun argued that the Australian political left had rushed to perform public respectability in the wake of the attack to avoid unfounded accusations of antisemitism, and criticized widespread media framing of the incident. He also publicly called out Schlanger and the Chabad organization for their longstanding support of Israeli military actions and illegal settlements in occupied Palestinian territories.

    In an official statement to the BBC, The University of Queensland, UQP’s parent institution, described Chun’s comments as “abhorrent and hateful to the innocent victims of the attack.” The institution added that it could not overlook or condone the remarks, nor move forward with publication in any way that could be interpreted as institutional endorsement or association with Chun’s views. UQP also expressed regret over the negative impact of the decision on Jazz Money, noting the institution holds deep respect for the award-winning Indigenous author and would welcome the chance to collaborate with her on future projects.

    Separately, New South Wales Police confirmed to the BBC that the force’s Engagement and Hate Crime Unit is leading an investigation into Chun’s social media and Substack post.

    Chun has pushed back against UQP’s decision, arguing on his public Instagram that the institution has failed to identify which specific passages of his political writing violate its internal policies and values, nor has it pointed to any clause in the existing publishing contract that justifies terminating the agreement. He also revealed that he and Money have been aware of UQP’s cancellation decision for several months, long before it became public.

    Money, whose poetry has earned national accolades including the 2025 Kate Challis RAKA Award for Indigenous artists and the Australia Council for the Arts First Nations Emerging Career Award, announced her relationship with UQP is permanently over. In an Instagram post, she warned that the decision to pulp *Bila* sets a dangerous precedent that any book exploring political, urgent or sensitive topics can be targeted for censorship, cancellation and retaliation.

    UQP’s move has prompted widespread backlash from Australia’s literary community, with multiple high-profile writers launching a boycott and severing all existing professional ties with the 76-year-old publisher. Award-winning Indigenous poet Evelyn Araluen said she was extremely disappointed by UQP’s handling of the book, and would terminate all remaining contracts she held with the press. Australian-Palestinian author Randa Abdel-Fattah, who made headlines earlier this year when she was disinvited from a major Adelaide literary festival sparking national outcry, said her upcoming upcoming UQP title *Discipline* will be her first and last book with the publisher. Other prominent writers including Melissa Lucashenko and Natalia Figueroa Barroso have also publicly announced they are ending their partnerships with the press.

    Founded in 1948 as an academic publishing house, UQP has grown into one of Australia’s leading independent publishers, releasing titles across fiction, nonfiction, poetry and children’s literature.

  • Kenyan leader sparks uproar after  mocking Nigerians’ spoken English

    Kenyan leader sparks uproar after mocking Nigerians’ spoken English

    A controversial comment from Kenyan President William Ruto has ignited fierce cross-border debate across African social media, after he claimed Kenyans speak some of the world’s best English while suggesting Nigerian-accented English is incomprehensible without a translator.

    Ruto made the remarks during a public address to members of the Kenyan diaspora in Italy on Monday. He opened the discussion on national language proficiency by boasting of the quality of Kenya’s education system and the high standard of English spoken by Kenyans. “Our education is good. Our English is good. We speak some of the best English in the world,” Ruto told the crowd, which responded with laughter. He added, “If you listen to a Nigerian speaking, you don’t know what they are saying. You need a translator even when they are speaking English.” Ruto also went on to note that Kenya has strong human capital that only requires additional training to reach its full potential.

    The comment quickly spread across social media platforms, drawing sharp condemnation from Nigerians, other Africans, and global observers alike. Critics have accused Ruto of demeaning a neighboring African nation and parroting colonial-era biases about language standards. Well-known Zimbabwean journalist Hopewell Chin’ono pushed back against the framing that English proficiency correlates to national worth, writing online: “English is a colonial language, not a measure of intelligence, capability, or national progress.”

    Former Nigerian senator Shehu Sani also criticized Ruto’s jab, pointing out Nigeria’s rich literary legacy that includes globally acclaimed voices such as Nobel Prize in Literature winner Wole Soyinka, foundational author Chinua Achebe, and bestselling writer Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. “Ruto is mocking the English of the country with a Nobel Prize for literature winner. The Nation of Achebe and Chimamanda,” Sani wrote on platform X.

    Many online commentators also urged Ruto to redirect his focus to domestic challenges within Kenya, including the country’s ongoing cost of living crisis and high unemployment rates, framing the controversial comment as an unnecessary distraction from pressing public issues.

    Linguistically, both Kenya and Nigeria inherited English as an official language from their history as former British colonies, but each nation has developed distinct, culturally rooted spoken varieties shaped by local indigenous languages. Nigeria is home to more than 500 distinct indigenous languages that have shaped the unique cadence, intonation, and accent of Nigerian English. In Kenya, the mix of Bantu, Nilotic, and Cushitic language families has similarly given rise to a distinct local English accent.

    A small contingent of Kenyan online users have defended Ruto’s comments, arguing that critics misinterpreted his intent and missed the intended humor of the offhand remark. As of Wednesday, Ruto’s administration has not issued an official statement or apology addressing the backlash.

    The social media firestorm comes amid a recent pattern of tense, high-profile online exchanges between Kenyan and Nigerian public figures and citizens. Earlier this month, Nigerian President Bola Tinubu drew backlash from Kenyan online users after claiming Nigerians were “better off than those in Kenya and other African countries” despite rising domestic fuel prices in Nigeria. Many online observers have interpreted Ruto’s recent comment as a tit-for-tat response to Tinubu’s earlier statement, though Ruto never explicitly referenced Tinubu’s remark during his address. Cross-border online spats between the two nations are common, with previous clashes centered on economic comparisons, pop culture, sports, and increasingly, political rhetoric.

  • In Baltic skies, NATO and Russian pilots size each other up warily but without a tilt into war

    In Baltic skies, NATO and Russian pilots size each other up warily but without a tilt into war

    At Lithuania’s Šiauliai Air Base, the rhythm of NATO’s frontline Baltic air policing mission is defined by split-second urgency. When the alliance’s scramble alert sounds, French Rafale fighter pilots — already pre-suited to cut response times — rush in vans to prepared, missile-armed jets waiting in hardened hangars. Within minutes of lifting off from the northern European base, they are over the Baltic Sea, executing standard intercept procedures for Russian military aircraft approaching NATO alliance airspace.

    On a recent busy Monday observed by an Associated Press journalist, French pilots scrambled under NATO command to intercept a coordinated Russian flight formation: two nuclear-capable Tu-22M3 supersonic bombers, which Russia has repurposed for ground strikes in Ukraine, escorted by advanced Su-30 and Su-35 fighter jets. The Russian warplanes flew a more than four-hour mission from a base near St. Petersburg, passing the coastlines of five NATO nations — Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland — before turning back near Danish airspace. According to the French detachment, the Russian aircraft never activated their transponders, filed required flight plans, or maintained radio contact with civilian air traffic controllers. Fighters from Sweden, Finland, Poland, Denmark and Romania also launched to monitor the incursion, a multilateral show of coordinated airspace security.

    This high-alert cat-and-mouse game plays out hundreds of times a year, hundreds of miles from public view, as NATO seeks to avoid an accidental escalation that could pull the 32-nation alliance into open conflict with Russia amid tensions over Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In intercepts like this, neither side crosses into open hostility: pilots from both forces simply monitor and document one another, maintaining a cautious distance even as armed missiles remain visible on jet hardpoints. As mission commanders describe it, the dynamic is less cat and mouse than two wary cats, claws bared but holding back from a fight.

    The Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania — all NATO members that share borders with Russia and its ally Belarus — lack the independent air power to defend their own airspace. Since 2004, when the three countries joined the alliance, NATO has rotated national detachments through Baltic bases to maintain 24/7, year-round air policing, a mission designed to deter aggression rather than provoke conflict, and reassure frontline allies of the alliance’s collective security commitment.

    Currently, the Šiauliai base hosts two detachments: a four-jet French Rafale wing, commanded by Lt. Col. Alexandre — whose full surname is withheld for security reasons — and a six F-16 contingent from the Romanian Air Force. The French detachment took over the mission from Spanish forces earlier this spring, and will hand off to an Italian unit when their four-month rotation ends in August. A wall inside the base’s temporary headquarters bears plaques and badges from every rotating detachment that has served at the base, a quiet record of the mission’s continuity.

    Col. Mihaita Marin, commander of the Romanian detachment, explained that NATO forces are required to scramble whenever Russian military aircraft violate International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) rules for international airspace — rules that govern transponder use, flight planning, and radio communication. “There are plenty of times in which, on purpose or not, they’re not really respecting the ICAO rules,” Marin said. “So obviously we are forced to take off and just make sure that they are who they say they are and their intention is peaceful.”

    The arrival of spring, which brings milder temperatures and clearer flying conditions across the Baltic region, has pushed interception rates higher. Since French and Romanian forces deployed for their rotation in early April, interceptions have become nearly a daily occurrence, a rate commanders expect to climb further as weather improves. Lt. Col. Alexandre noted that it remains unclear why Russian pilots repeatedly operate in violation of global airspace rules. “We don’t know if it’s lack of professionalism or just a means for them to test us,” he said. “But what is sure is that we need to go every time. We cannot say, ‘OK, that’s usual, this time we will just let them pass.’”

    Across the tense standoff, the core goal of the NATO mission remains consistent: to maintain constant vigilance without triggering the open war both sides currently seek to avoid. “We watch each other, scrutinize each other and try to make sure that it doesn’t go any further,” Alexandre said.

  • Trump says ceasefire between Israel, Lebanon to be extended by 3 weeks

    Trump says ceasefire between Israel, Lebanon to be extended by 3 weeks

    On April 23, 2026, at the White House in Washington D.C., U.S. President Donald Trump made a key announcement: the fragile 10-day ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, which went into effect on April 16, will be extended by an additional three weeks. The announcement came just hours after the two nations wrapped up their second round of ambassador-level talks in the U.S. capital, a meeting that brought together senior diplomatic leadership from both sides alongside top U.S. officials.

    Trump confirmed the meeting took place in the White House Oval Office, with attendees including U.S. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Israel’s Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter, Lebanon’s Ambassador to the U.S. Nada Hamadeh Moawad, and U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa. In a post published to his social media platform Truth Social, Trump simply stated, “The Meeting went very well!”, offering no further specifics on the discussions that unfolded during the closed-door session.

    The U.S. leader also outlined Washington’s planned next steps in the region, noting the United States will partner with Lebanon’s national government to help the country build its defensive capacity against Hezbollah, the Iran-aligned political and military group that holds significant influence in southern Lebanon. Trump further shared his long-term diplomatic goal, saying he remains eager to host senior leadership from both nations in the near future: Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. This plan aligns with comments Trump made last week, when he said he expected the two leaders to visit the White House within one to two weeks to work toward a comprehensive permanent peace agreement that would resolve ongoing tensions related to Hezbollah.

    The original 10-day truce was implemented after weeks of escalating cross-border hostilities that unfolded amid the broader U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran. It is important to note that Israel and Lebanon have never maintained formal diplomatic relations. For decades, Israel has classified Hezbollah as an Iranian proxy force, and current negotiations are being conducted exclusively between the Israeli government and Lebanon’s official national government, with Hezbollah not participating directly in the talks.

    Despite the pause in large-scale fighting that the ceasefire brought, the truce has remained unstable throughout its first week, with low-level tensions persisting along Lebanon’s southern border, leaving regional observers cautious about the long-term prospects of the newly announced extension.

  • First ever talks to ditch fossil fuels as UN deadlock deepens

    First ever talks to ditch fossil fuels as UN deadlock deepens

    Against a backdrop of rising global temperatures driven by decades of fossil fuel consumption and repeated deadlock at United Nations climate negotiations, around 60 countries have convened this week in Santa Marta, Colombia, for a landmark gathering aimed at forging collective action to phase out coal, oil, and gas — a goal that major UN climate summits have repeatedly failed to deliver.

    The participating nations collectively account for approximately one-fifth of the world’s total fossil fuel production, counting major producers including Colombia, Australia, and Nigeria among their ranks. Notably absent from the talks, however, are the world’s largest fossil fuel-consuming and producing powers: the United States, China, and India.

    For years, progress on cutting fossil fuel dependence has stalled at the annual UN Climate Change Conference (COP), the global governing body for climate action. The consensus-based rule structure of COP negotiations means every participating nation holds veto power over final agreements, allowing large fossil fuel-producing blocs to block ambitious targets. This gridlock left many delegates deeply frustrated after last November’s COP30 held in Belém, Brazil, where efforts to adopt a formal global roadmap for a full fossil fuel phase-out collapsed in the face of opposition from major oil-exporting countries.

    Organizers emphasize that this new Colombian gathering is not intended to replace the COP process, but rather to complement it by building momentum that can break long-standing impasses. The urgency of this effort has been amplified by leading climate science, which warns that the window to limit global warming to the 1.5°C threshold — the safe guardrail set in the Paris Agreement to avoid the worst, irreversible climate impacts — is rapidly closing.

    “ We are inevitably going to crash through the 1.5°C limit within the next three to five years,” Professor Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, told BBC News. “Breaking through 1.5°C means we enter a far more dangerous world — with more frequent and intense droughts, floods, fires and heatwaves — and we are already approaching critical tipping points in major Earth systems.”

    Beyond climate science, shifting global geopolitics is reshaping the global energy conversation, adding new urgency to the push for transition. Under the second Trump administration, the world’s largest economy, the United States, has ramped up aggressive policies to expand domestic coal, oil, and gas production, creating global uncertainty about the pace of decarbonization. Many middle-power nations have since adopted a wait-and-see stance, hesitant to commit to fast transition without clearer global direction.

    Participants in the Santa Marta talks say the gathering’s core goal is to demonstrate that a critical mass of nations is already committed to shifting to renewable energy, giving hesitant countries the confidence to move forward. “We are committed to working with other countries to support those wishing to drive forward their transitions to clean and secure energy,” said UK Climate Envoy Rachel Kyte, who is in attendance. “We have the experience of our transition to share and the recent experience of driving to energy security with our clean power mission.”

    Recent geopolitical unrest has underscored the risks of continued fossil fuel dependence, pushing energy security back to the top of the global policy agenda. Ongoing conflict in the Middle East, combined with rising tensions in the strategic Strait of Hormuz through which 20% of the world’s daily oil shipments pass, has sent global oil prices climbing in recent weeks.

    “The urgency is multiplied. What’s happening has worsened the fossil fuel crisis we’re already in,” said former Irish President Mary Robinson, a founding member of the elders group of former global leaders, who is attending the talks. “This is exactly why this conference matters now.”

    These market disruptions are already shifting consumer and industry behavior, Rockström reported. After a recent advisory board meeting with automotive giant Mercedes-Benz, he noted that the company had seen a sharp uptick in European consumer demand for electric vehicles, driven by growing public desire for energy independence away from volatile global fossil fuel markets.

    The formation of this new “coalition of the willing” has sparked debate about whether it signals a permanent shift away from the consensus-based COP process. But observers and organizers alike argue it can instead revitalize global climate action. “Ultimately you don’t need all countries to drive global progress. You need a starting point,” said Katerine Petersen, a climate analyst with think tank E3G who is attending the gathering. “Then you need a coalition that can expand over time and show how it can and will be useful. And I think that’s what we’re expecting to see from Santa Marta.”

    Organizers stress the meeting remains complementary to COP, and key leaders from last year’s COP30 in Brazil are in attendance in Santa Marta. Conclusions from the Colombian gathering will be integrated into Brazil’s national fossil fuel phase-out roadmap, which the country will release ahead of COP31 scheduled to take place in Turkey this November. Even as domestic protestors in London rallied this week against plans for new UK oil and gas exploration, the Santa Marta meeting marks a key test of whether smaller, committed blocs can push the world faster toward a clean energy future when global negotiations stall.

  • Steve Rosenberg: Kremlin’s tightening grip on internet fuels public discontent

    Steve Rosenberg: Kremlin’s tightening grip on internet fuels public discontent

    Near the heart of Moscow, steps away from the Kremlin walls, dozens of Russian residents stand in an orderly line outside the presidential administration building. They have gathered not to protest openly, but to exercise one of the few legally permitted forms of civic action: submitting a formal petition urging President Vladimir Putin to roll back the Kremlin’s escalating crackdown on online access. What should be a routine act of democratic input, however, carries palpable risk in Russia’s increasingly authoritarian political climate. From across the street, uniformed security officers openly film both the petitioners and the reporting team documenting the event, a quiet but clear reminder that speaking out carries consequences. When asked if she feels afraid, Yulia, a small catering business owner waiting in the queue, admits openly: “Very scared. I’m shaking.”

    The Kremlin has been steadily tightening its grip on Russia’s digital cyberspace for years, but recent weeks have seen sweeping new restrictions that have upended daily life for millions of users. Access to globally popular messaging platforms including WhatsApp and Telegram has been sharply limited, while widespread mobile internet disruptions and full blackouts have been reported across multiple regions of the country. President Putin has publicly acknowledged the connectivity problems, framing the measures as necessary “operational work to prevent terrorist attacks.” He has also issued formal instructions to officials to preserve “uninterrupted operation” for critical internet services, but stopped short of promising to roll back the broader crackdown.

    For small business owners like Yulia, the restrictions are not just an inconvenience – they threaten her entire livelihood. Her catering operation runs entirely online, relying on global messaging apps to coordinate with clients and a public website to accept orders. “There were times recently when our website was not accessible. We couldn’t generate revenue,” she explained. “We are losing money every time there is a blocking of the internet, a blocking of Telegram and WhatsApp. Without internet access, my business in this form will not exist.”

    Russian officials defend the curbs as a matter of national and public safety. They claim that mobile internet blackouts help disorient attacking Ukrainian drones, a justification critics point out is undermined by the fact that drone strikes have continued in regions where connectivity has been fully shut off. Authorities also accuse international messaging platforms of refusing to comply with Russia’s strict local data storage laws, which require user information to be held on servers within Russian borders. Alongside restricting global services, regulators have launched a crackdown on virtual private networks (VPNs), tools that thousands of Russians use to circumvent government censorship and access blocked content.

    As the centerpiece of the Kremlin’s push for a “sovereign internet” – a closed, state-controlled network cut off from much of the global web – the government has aggressively promoted MAX, a new homegrown, state-backed messaging app. But the Russian public remains deeply skeptical of the platform. Many users worry the app is designed specifically to let security services surveil private communications, a concern echoed by opposition figures. “Many people think that this messenger is made especially by the government to check our messages,” said Boris Nadezhdin, a former member of parliament who was barred from running against Putin in the 2024 presidential election.

    Across much of Russia today, only government-approved websites and services are accessible to mobile users. Opposition analysts warn that a digital equivalent of the Cold War-era Iron Curtain is being constructed around the country, designed to cut Russian citizens off from outside information and unapproved content. “The idea is to divide Russia from the outside world,” said Andrei Kolesnikov, a columnist with independent opposition outlet Novaya Gazeta. “This world is believed to be poisonous to the brains of Russians. Russia was always blocked, primarily from the West, which was the source of ‘bad, revolutionary, liberal ideas’. It was always like this.”

    Unlike the Soviet era, however, generations of Russians have fully integrated the open internet into every part of daily life, making the new restrictions feel like a sudden and disruptive shock to routine. For many, the anger over the crackdown stems less from ideological demands for free speech and more from the loss of ordinary convenience that most people now take for granted. “It’s less to do with freedom of speech and more about habit,” explained Yulia Grekova, an activist based in Vladimir, a city 190 kilometers outside Moscow. “People have got used to paying for things and ordering taxis with their mobiles. They sit in the bus messaging friends. There are very few people who don’t use mobile internet for work, public services and to keep in touch with family. That’s why there’s such an angry reaction. Everyone’s affected.”

    Grekova has firsthand experience of how the Kremlin responds to public pushback against the internet restrictions. She recently attempted to organize a public rally in Vladimir to protest the curbs, but authorities blocked the event through a series of procedural stalling tactics. When she submitted applications for 11 different potential rally locations, officials rejected every site claiming street cleaning was scheduled for the requested date. City hall offered an alternative venue, only to reverse that approval a short time later, citing the risk of a Ukrainian drone attack. Grekova was later visited at her workplace by three police officers who served her a formal warning prohibiting any unsanctioned protest. “They filmed me signing the official warning from the prosecutor. I felt like some kind of terrorist,” she said. Similar attempts to hold protest rallies have been rejected across dozens of Russian cities, with authorities offering a range of absurd justifications, from scheduled roller-skating classes to residual COVID-19 restrictions.

    During a visit to central Vladimir, the impact of the crackdown was immediately visible: state media sites and domestic taxi apps functioned normally, but Google searches failed to load, and all independent news sites were completely inaccessible. Local residents described constant small disruptions that have upended ordinary routines. “It’s much harder to communicate,” said Maria, who was out walking with her infant child. “We want to keep across the latest news and trends. Instead, we’re lagging behind.” For some, the restrictions have compounded existing fatigue over the ongoing war in Ukraine. “In the past, when there was no internet, the world seemed a brighter place, because we knew less,” Maria said. “I try to avoid news about the war. I don’t want to fill my head with it. We’re tired of news about people being killed.” Other residents described far more practical disruptions: “Today I couldn’t pay for petrol. And my satnav is glitching,” said local resident Denis. Small business owners have been hit hardest, said Alexander, another local resident: “People are annoyed. Especially those with small businesses. They lose customers when they can’t access the internet.” For Grekova, the crackdown feels like a deliberate step backwards into a pre-digital era. “It feels like we’re going backwards, sliding back to the past,” she said.

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov defends the restrictions as a temporary necessity driven by the current security environment. “In the current situation, security considerations dictate the need for certain measures,” Peskov told reporters in Moscow. “These are being taken and most of our citizens understand the need for them. It’s clear that internet restrictions inconvenience many people. But this is the period we’re in. Once the need for such measures disappears, services will be fully restored and return to normal.” But critics warn that the new restrictions have already become the permanent new normal, and that the Kremlin will only continue to ramp up controls rather than roll them back. “I don’t think that this regime is ready to go back,” Kolesnikov said. “They can only go forward in terms of more repressions. What is bad for the authorities is an accumulation of discontent and it could play out in the future. We don’t know in what shape. But it is evident that irritation and discontent are accumulating.”

    That discontent is already starting to bubble into public view. In recent weeks, a viral video posted to Instagram by prominent Russian celebrity blogger Victoria Bonya criticizing the internet crackdown has amassed tens of millions of views. While Bonya did not directly blame Putin, she told him directly: “There is a huge, thick wall between you and us, the ordinary people.” Under growing public pressure, Putin acknowledged last week that he could not ignore the connectivity problems facing Russian citizens, and instructed security officials to find ways to accommodate the “vital interests of citizens.” But the statement stopped far short of a policy reversal, with no mention of ending the broader restrictions.

    Public opinion polling suggests that Putin’s approval ratings have fallen to their lowest level since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, with internet restrictions just one of multiple sources of growing public unease. Russians are also facing rising food prices, strained public services, and growing war fatigue. “People begin to understand there is a direct connection between their everyday problems, like healthcare, food prices, problems with internet, and the politics of Vladimir Putin,” Nadezhdin said. “And this is a new situation in Russia.”

    After submitting her petition outside the Kremlin, Yulia has returned to work baking bread at her catering company, already planning how to adapt to the new online restrictions. Like many Russians, she says her family has a long history of adapting to massive political and social upheaval. “My great-grandfather was wealthier than average. In a Soviet village that was considered a sin. His property was taken away from him and he was moved to Siberia. But his family adapted. My parents went through the collapse of the Soviet Union: they adapted to a market economy. Now it’s my turn to adapt. Then it will be my daughter’s turn.” When asked what she expects for the future, Yulia says long-term planning has become impossible. “The future is not even mentioned in day-to-day conversations with friends and relatives. It’s like: what are we doing in three days, in a week, in a month? Nothing more than a month.” Across Russia, as restrictions tighten and daily life grows more unpredictable, a deep, pervasive sense of uncertainty is quietly rising.

  • Benjamin Luke Johnston revealed as gun for hire who shot and killed Rebels bikie boss

    Benjamin Luke Johnston revealed as gun for hire who shot and killed Rebels bikie boss

    A long-standing court-ordered publication ban that concealed the identity of a contracted hitman has finally been lifted by Western Australia’s Supreme Court, allowing the public to learn the name of the former soldier who murdered the leader of the Rebels outlaw motorcycle gang in 2020.

    Thirty-nine-year-old Benjamin Luke Johnston was recruited by a rival faction of outlaw motorcycle gangs to carry out the targeted killing of Rebels national president Nick Martin, court documents confirm. On a December day in 2020, Johnston positioned himself hundreds of meters away from the Perth Motorplex, where Martin was attending a public event alongside his family, and fired a sniper round that struck Martin in the chest, killing him instantly in front of onlookers and his loved ones.

    Johnston pleaded guilty to the charge of murder in 2021 and was subsequently handed a 20-year prison sentence for his crime. Beyond his own conviction, Johnston also served as a key prosecution witness in the separate murder trial of David Pye, another bikie figure linked to the assassination plot. Johnston testified during Pye’s trial that Pye was the person who arranged and paid for the contract killing. A jury ultimately found Pye guilty of murder, and he remains in custody awaiting his sentencing hearing.

    The suppression order on Johnston’s identity was in place for more than three years, originally put in effect out of concerns for his personal safety while he was serving his sentence and cooperating with authorities. However, when the matter came before the Supreme Court of WA on Friday, the court heard that those safety concerns no longer hold any weight. Johnston’s legal representative, David Merena, told the court that his client planned to enroll in a university degree program in health science while incarcerated, a goal that required him to use his legal name. The gag order had also created unnecessary barriers for family and friends to schedule prison visits to see Johnston, Merena added.

    Counsel for Pye pushed back against the request to lift the order, arguing that the suppression should remain in place in case Johnston is required to give testimony during any future appeal proceedings for Pye’s conviction. Despite that objection, Justice Joseph McGrath ruled in favor of lifting the publication ban. In his ruling, Justice McGrath noted that Johnston’s name is already widely known among the prison population, and Johnston himself has stated that he no longer fears for his personal safety behind bars. The judge added that WA Police had been consulted on the request, and state authorities no longer argued that the suppression order was necessary to protect Johnston’s security.

  • What to know if your flight is canceled amid rising jet fuel costs

    What to know if your flight is canceled amid rising jet fuel costs

    A wave of flight cancellations is spreading across the globe, sparked by jet fuel supply strains and sharp price hikes tied to ongoing conflict in the Middle East – and the ripple effects are leaving travelers navigating inconsistent, confusing rules for compensation and rebooking that shift dramatically depending on their departure and destination regions. What makes this wave of disruptions particularly impactful is its timing: it comes as the summer travel season begins to ramp up, with high-profile global events set to put additional strain on already stretched airport and airline infrastructure.

    “These pressures are arriving at a time when summer travel demand is ramping up, with major events such as the World Cup expected to put additional strain on airports,” explained Eric Napoli, chief legal officer at AirHelp, a passenger rights advocacy organization that supports travelers seeking compensation for disrupted travel plans.

    Unlike sudden weather-related cancellations that often leave passengers stranded with little advance notice, most fuel-linked flight cuts are being announced weeks or months ahead of schedule to give travelers time to adjust plans. German aviation giant Lufthansa Group, for example, recently confirmed it would cut 20,000 short-haul flights across its entire network through October, one of the highest-profile industry adjustments to date.

    If your flight is canceled, industry experts say the first step is to check your carrier’s official digital channels immediately. For passengers flying with U.S.-based airlines, the airline’s app or website typically offers the fastest, most streamlined path to rebooking, according to Tyler Hosford, security director at International SOS, a leading global risk and travel security firm. For non-U.S. carriers, however, digital self-service tools are often less robust, so Hosford advises travelers to pursue multiple channels simultaneously, including dedicated customer service phone lines and in-person assistance at airport check-in desks.

    In nearly all cases, passengers are guaranteed at minimum a choice between a full refund or a rebooking on the next available flight, though exact regulatory requirements differ by country. For example, under U.S. consumer protection rules, if a cancellation leads a passenger to choose to abandon their trip entirely, the airline is legally required to issue a full cash refund, regardless of the reason for the cancellation. While carriers may offer travel credits as an alternative, passengers are legally entitled to full repayment for unused airfare and add-on fees, including checked bag charges and paid seat upgrades.

    Passenger protection rules are not uniform across the world, ranging from the cross-border liability standards set by the Montreal Convention, which applies to over 140 countries, to individual national regulatory frameworks in the U.S., Canada, the EU, UK, Turkey and Brazil.

    Europe boasts some of the strongest passenger protections globally, including mandatory compensation for eligible disrupted flights. These rules apply to all flights departing from any EU airport, regardless of where the airline is based, as well as all inbound flights to the EU operated by EU-based carriers, even for journeys starting outside the bloc. The United Kingdom retains a nearly identical regulatory structure to the EU.

    By comparison, the U.S. and Canada offer far more limited statutory protections for passengers facing cancellations. Across Asia, rules vary wildly from country to country, and in many markets, travelers must rely on individual airline policies rather than binding formal government regulations. To avoid confusion, experts recommend researching the passenger rights rules of your departure country before starting your trip.

    The question of whether you are entitled to additional compensation beyond rebooking or refund usually hinges on whether local regulators classify the disruption as within the airline’s control. Even if airlines cite fuel shortages or price spikes as the reason for cancellation, Napoli notes that EU regulations still require carriers to fulfill their duty of care to stranded passengers, which includes providing necessary support such as accommodation, meals and rebooking assistance.

    “While airlines are citing fuel shortages as a reason for upcoming cancellations, travelers need to know that this does not automatically waive their rights” under EU laws, Napoli emphasized.

    To minimize stress and complications if disruptions occur, travel experts recommend a handful of proactive steps before your departure. First, always sign up for official flight alerts from your carrier to get real-time updates, and book your ticket directly through the airline rather than third-party online travel agencies: resolving issues directly with the carrier is far faster and simpler than going through an intermediary. Mapping out backup options ahead of time can also cut down on stress if your original plans fall through.

    If you need to file a compensation claim or formal complaint, thorough documentation is non-negotiable. Travelers should save every relevant document, including original boarding passes, receipts for extra expenses incurred due to the cancellation, official cancellation notices, and all communication with airline representatives. Experts advise taking screenshots of all digital updates and messages, writing down key details from phone calls with customer service, and requesting a written confirmation of the disruption from the airline that includes the official stated reason for the cancellation.

    One common mistake travelers make is accepting the first alternative flight offered by the airline without exploring other options. Experts advise checking other flights, alternate routes, and even nearby airports to find a faster or more convenient connection that fits your schedule.

    If the airline’s offered rebooking does not meet your needs – particularly if the next available flight is days after your original departure – you are permitted to book an alternative flight independently and request a refund from the original airline. However, travelers should be aware that they will likely need to cover any fare difference upfront, and there is no guarantee that the difference will be reimbursed later.

    Additional practical tips to avoid getting stuck include booking the earliest flight possible on your travel day, which leaves more time to rebook the same day if your flight is canceled; setting up independent flight alerts through third-party tracking apps like Flighty, which often notify users of cancellations or delays before the airline sends out an official alert; and maintaining a calm, polite demeanor when interacting with airline staff, who are far more likely to go out of their way to help respectful passengers.

    “Ultimately, the shortage is squeezing the entire system, from travelers to airlines, and is something to watch as the industry looks for any relief ahead of the summer travel season,” Napoli said.