作者: admin

  • Venezuela earthquakes kill 920 people as families desperate for news

    Venezuela earthquakes kill 920 people as families desperate for news

    In a devastating geological event that has shaken Venezuela to its core, two massive back-to-back earthquakes struck the nation’s northern regions last Wednesday, leaving a trail of death, destruction, and urgent humanitarian need that has drawn a coordinated global response. The second of the two tremors registered a magnitude of 7.5, marking one of the most powerful seismic events to hit the South American country in more than a century.

    Official government updates confirm the disaster has already claimed at least 920 lives, left 3,360 people injured, and left at least 172 individuals still trapped beneath collapsed infrastructure, with hundreds more reported missing. Authorities warn the final death toll is expected to climb as rescue teams work to clear rubble and reach cut-off areas. The coastal state of La Guaira, located just north of the capital Caracas and home to Venezuela’s primary international airport and one of its two largest commercial ports, has borne the brunt of the destruction.

    For dozens of families across the hardest-hit region, every passing minute brings a agonizing mix of hope and despair. Natacha Diaz, a resident of La Guaira, is among those clinging to faith as she waits for news of her two daughters, ages 22 and 23, who were working as manicurists inside a collapsed local shopping mall when the quakes hit. “They were with their friends. I just want them to be found. I have faith and hope that they are there,” Diaz told the BBC. “I just want them back with me. They are all I have, please.”

    Dozens of structures across northern Venezuela have been reduced to rubble, including multiple hospitals, shopping centers, and residential buildings, with more than 1,000 additional critical infrastructure sites sustaining major damage. Surviving medical facilities have been stretched far beyond capacity, treating injured patients in makeshift outdoor care tents. Long before the disaster struck, Venezuela’s decades-long economic crisis and chronic underinvestment had left the country’s healthcare system severely under-resourced, a gap that has been thrown into sharp relief by the earthquake emergency. “All our hospitals lack supplies, lack medicines, we are not able to provide medical attention to our people in a normal day,” Dr. Pedro Javier Fernandez told the BBC. “Now with this tragedy, the emergency is even bigger and it’s more difficult to face than in other countries.”

    Initial rescue efforts were hampered by broken communications links, damaged and blocked roadways, and a critical shortage of heavy equipment and supplies, forcing many first responders and civilian volunteers to dig through debris with their bare hands in a race to pull survivors out. In recent days, hundreds of international search-and-rescue teams have arrived in the country to bolster local efforts, with more personnel and aid en route. A British military flight carrying specialist rescue teams from 14 UK fire services, search dogs, and drone detection equipment departed from RAF Brize Norton on Friday, joining teams already deployed from the United States, the Netherlands, Mexico, and Switzerland. The U.S. has also committed $150 million in humanitarian aid, alongside deploying warships and cargo planes to support relief operations.

    Jan Egeland, secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council, said international teams on the ground have already witnessed “horrific damage” across the affected regions, noting that Venezuela’s pre-existing crumbling infrastructure left the nation uniquely vulnerable to such a disaster. “Venezuela was ill-prepared and vulnerable in an emergency situation because of its already crumbling infrastructure following decades of underinvestment,” Egeland told the BBC.

    Amid the widespread grief and destruction, small moments of hope have lifted morale across the country. In one widely broadcast story on state television, three young siblings were pulled alive from the rubble of a collapsed building in La Guaira, emerging covered in dust after being trapped for days. “Come here, my child, come here,” a rescuer called out to the first child, followed by a young girl, and then the third sibling, who emerged sobbing but alive.

    The disaster has also already claimed notable victims, including Andrea, the wife of Venezuelan footballer Héctor Bello, who died while shielding and saving their toddler daughter during the collapse. “I’ll tell her the story of how you saved her, my love – how you gave your own life for our daughter, how you were a brave woman who never abandoned her, even as you took your last breaths,” Bello wrote in an emotional Instagram post. Foreign casualties have also been confirmed: one Portuguese national, two Brazilian citizens, and four Spanish nationals are among the dead, while 106 Spanish citizens remain unaccounted for, per Spanish foreign ministry reports.

    Beyond La Guaira, multiple other states across northern Venezuela have felt the impact of the disaster, with the capital Caracas seeing heavy damage in the upscale neighborhoods of Los Palos Grandes and Altamira. More than 214 aftershocks have been recorded since the initial twin quakes, with most concentrated along the northern coastline spanning La Guaira, Aragua, Carabobo, and Falcón.

    The earthquake comes at a moment of extreme political uncertainty for Venezuela. Less than six months ago, long-time leftist leader Nicolás Maduro, who had governed the country since 2013, was seized by U.S. forces in Caracas and extradited to New York to face federal drug trafficking charges. Maduro’s ally, former vice president Delcy Rodríguez, stepped into the role of acting president, a move that has been contested by opposition supporters who had expected the U.S. to install opposition leader María Corina Machado to lead the interim government.

    Venezuelan opposition leader Leopoldo Lopez, who lives in exile in Spain, described the scale of the devastation as “huge” and said the population remains in “shock.” He criticized the interim government’s inability to mount a timely, large-scale rescue response, but praised the outpouring of grassroots support from Venezuelan civil society. The United Nations has pledged to coordinate the international humanitarian response, with the UN’s humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher saying, “I want people to know in Venezuela that help is coming.”

  • Senegal routs 10-man Iraq 5-0 to boost hopes of reaching World Cup knockout rounds

    Senegal routs 10-man Iraq 5-0 to boost hopes of reaching World Cup knockout rounds

    TORONTO – Heading into their final Group I World Cup group stage match on Friday, Senegal faced a clear and unforgiving mandate: they not only needed a win, but a lopsided, goal-heavy victory to keep their knockout stage hopes alive. By the final whistle, the African side delivered exactly that, tearing through a shorthanded Iraq squad to claim a resounding 5-0 triumph that leaves them on the cusp of advancing to the Round of 32.

    From the opening minutes, Senegal came out pressing aggressively, and they earned their first reward just four minutes into the contest when Habib Diarra found the back of the net to put his side up early. The game’s turning point arrived just nine minutes later, when Iraq defender Rebin Sulaka was shown a straight red card for pulling Sadio Mane’s jersey to stop the winger from breaking away on a one-on-one scoring chance. Left down to 10 men for virtually the entire remainder of the match, Iraq was forced into a defensive rearguard that held firm for nearly 40 minutes after the red card, with Senegal unable to extend their lead until the 56th minute, when Ismaila Sarr slotted home the side’s second goal.

    What followed was a devastating second-half scoring flurry from Senegal. Midfielder Pape Gueye bagged a brace, both goals powerful strikes from just outside the 18-yard box, before substitute Iliman Ndiaye capped off the rout with Senegal’s fifth goal of the night.

    The dominant result leaves Senegal sitting at three points in Group I with a +2 goal differential, currently in third place in the group. With only the eight best third-place teams across all groups earning a spot in the knockout round, Senegal has done everything it can to advance – but now must wait for the remaining six group stage matches across the tournament to conclude to learn their fate. “The job is done, but fate is no longer in our hands,” Senegal head coach Pape Thiaw said in post-match comments. “We have to wait until the other matches are over.”

    Gueye echoed his coach’s sentiment, noting that the team executed the game plan they came into the match with. “We had to score as many goals as possible,” Gueye said. “So there you go.” Diarra, who opened the scoring for Senegal, expressed confidence that the side’s strong result would be enough to see them through to the next round. “They gave us problems, but we solved them,” he said. “We played a great match, both collectively and individually. Now, here we are. I can say we are focused on our next match.”

    For Iraq, the loss brings an early end to their historic World Cup run, marking their first appearance at the tournament since 1986. They exit the competition winless, having failed to pick up a single point across three group stage matches. “I want to apologize for our fans, for our country, these three games,” Iraqi defender Merchas Doski said after the match.

    Even so, Iraq head coach Graham Arnold framed the team’s qualification for the tournament itself as a remarkable achievement. “Hopefully the players will go away from this enjoying the experience of being in the World Cup for the first time in 40 years,” he said, “but also learning from mistakes.”

  • Sri Lanka keep alive Women’s T20 World Cup semifinals hopes after beating Scotland

    Sri Lanka keep alive Women’s T20 World Cup semifinals hopes after beating Scotland

    MANCHESTER, England – A heart-stopping final-over finish at Old Trafford on Friday handed Sri Lanka a narrow three-wicket win over Scotland, keeping alive the underdog side’s slim hopes of reaching the Women’s Twenty20 World Cup semifinals for the first time in tournament history.

    Scotland, appearing in its second consecutive T20 World Cup, posted a competitive total of 151 for 6 after 20 overs. Only top-order batter Sarah Bryce put Sri Lanka’s bowling attack under sustained pressure: stepping in after her sister and Scotland captain Kathryn Bryce fell to leave the side 66-2 in the 10th over, Sarah Bryce hit an unbeaten 47 off 33 deliveries, including a boundary off the final ball of Scotland’s innings to push the team past the 150 mark.

    Chasing a 152-run target to secure victory, Sri Lanka got off to a blistering start: veteran captain Chamari Athapaththu, competing in her 10th T20 World Cup, smashed 33 runs off just 16 deliveries before being dismissed with Sri Lanka at 57-2 in the sixth over. After Athapaththu’s exit, Sri Lanka’s batting lineup slowed dramatically, dragging out the chase and reaching 154 for 7 on the second-to-last ball of the final over.

    The dramatic closing sequence began when Scotland medium-pacer Rachel Slater was tasked with defending seven runs from the six deliveries of the last over. She gave up just one single off each of her first three balls before suddenly pulling up in pain and collapsing to the pitch with a suspected knee injury. Distressed, Slater eventually left the field in tears, forcing Scotland to call on alternate bowler Priyanaz Chatterji to finish the over. Chatterji gave up a single on her first delivery before tailender Sugandika Kumari hit a match-winning boundary to seal the three-wicket victory.

    While the win marks Sri Lanka’s third victory of the tournament — its best ever performance at a single Women’s T20 World Cup — the slow, last-ball finish barely improved the side’s net run rate, leaving its semifinal hopes hanging by a thread. West Indies now holds the upper hand for the second and final semifinal spot in Sri Lanka’s group, and will secure qualification if it beats winless Ireland in its final group match on Saturday.

    For Scotland, the heartbreaking last-over defeat consigns the side to a fifth-place finish in the group, falling short of the fourth-place spot that would have granted direct qualification for the 2028 Women’s T20 World Cup hosted by Pakistan.

    Saturday’s tournament schedule also includes a matchup between the Netherlands and Pakistan, and a group-stage game between already semifinal-qualified England and defending champion New Zealand.

  • US conducts strikes on Iran after attack on cargo ship

    US conducts strikes on Iran after attack on cargo ship

    Tensions have reignited in the Persian Gulf after a one-way drone attack on a commercial cargo vessel transiting the Strait of Hormuz, prompting the United States military to launch retaliatory strikes against Iranian assets. The June assault, which Washington blames on Iranian forces, violated a recently brokered ceasefire between the two nations, marking a sharp escalation in a region that remains one of the world’s most critical chokepoints for global energy trade.

    The drone strike on Thursday left no reported casualties among the cargo ship’s crew, but it triggered emergency plans to evacuate more than 11,000 sailors who were stranded in the area by heightened regional hostilities. Within 24 hours, US Central Command (Centcom) confirmed it had carried out targeted strikes against key Iranian infrastructure: missile and drone storage facilities, as well as coastal radar positions along the Iranian coastline. As of Friday evening, Iranian officials had not issued any public response to the US strikes.

    Speaking to reporters at the White House shortly before the strikes were officially announced, President Donald Trump deflected questions about a potential US military response and the status of the existing ceasefire. When pressed for details, Trump merely told reporters “You’ll find out,” adding that he disapproved of the unprovoked attack: “I don’t like the fact that they took a shot yesterday. They shouldn’t be doing that.” Pressed on why Iran would choose to break the truce, Trump only offered that “they’re a little bit different.”

    In its official statement framing the retaliatory action, Centcom characterized the strikes as a measured but powerful answer to the unprovoked aggression against commercial shipping. The command emphasized that the attack by Iranian forces constituted a clear violation of the terms of the ceasefire agreement reached between Washington and Tehran in mid-June. Beyond the ceasefire breach, Centcom noted that Iran’s repeated hostile actions directly undermine the principle of freedom of navigation in the strait, a vital artery that carries a huge share of global commerce, including energy exports and key industrial commodities.

    “Furthermore, Iran’s dangerous behavior undermined freedom of navigation as commerce increasingly flows through the vital international trade corridor,” the Centcom statement read. The command added that the US military would maintain its posture in the region to protect commercial shipping: “The United States military will continue to provide safe passage coordination and support to commercial vessels transiting the strait.”

    The current escalation follows months of open hostilities that began in late February, when the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes against Iranian targets across the Middle East. In response to those attacks, Tehran effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, the 21-mile wide waterway that connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea and carries roughly a fifth of the world’s daily oil consumption and a large share of global liquefied natural gas exports. The closure sent global oil prices spiking sharply and disrupted supplies of other critical commodities, including agricultural fertilizer, exacerbating supply chain pressures across global markets.

    To de-escalate the crisis, the United States and Iran signed a 14-point memorandum of understanding on June 17 that agreed to end all open hostilities between the two nations. A key provision of that truce required Iran to exercise its best efforts to guarantee the safe passage of all commercial vessels through the strait, with no tolls or restrictions on transit, for a 60-day period. Thursday’s drone attack marks the first major breach of that agreement, throwing the future of the ceasefire into doubt and raising fears of a renewed full-scale conflict in the strategic region.

  • UK search team joins Venezuela earthquake rescue effort

    UK search team joins Venezuela earthquake rescue effort

    A catastrophic natural disaster has left Venezuela reeling, after two back-to-back powerful earthquakes struck the South American nation earlier this week, pushing the confirmed death toll close to 1,000 and triggering a massive international humanitarian response. On Friday evening, the United Kingdom launched its own contribution to the relief effort, dispatching a specialized search-and-rescue detachment that departed from RAF Brize Norton bound for the disaster zone.

    The Royal Air Force flight carries 61 personnel alongside purpose-built rescue equipment that includes search sniffer dogs and aerial drone technology to aid in locating survivors trapped beneath collapsed structures. Coordinated by the Merseyside Fire and Rescue Service, the UK team draws together experienced firefighters, disaster response experts, medical personnel, humanitarian workers, and security specialists from across the country, all tasked with supporting ongoing search operations.

    Alongside the deployment of on-the-ground rescue resources, the British government has committed £2 million in dedicated humanitarian funding to address critical needs across the most affected regions. The 7.2 and 7.5 magnitude quakes struck just seconds apart on Wednesday, with their epicenter located approximately 160 kilometers west of Venezuela’s capital, Caracas. The powerful tremors displaced tens of thousands of residents, levelled thousands of structures, and left a growing number of people unaccounted for. As of 9:00 PM BST Friday, a public registry tracking missing persons recorded more than 52,000 people that remain out of contact with relatives.

    Local medical infrastructure has been stretched to breaking point in the hardest-hit regions, with local hospitals overwhelmed by an influx of injured patients and facing crippling shortages of life-saving supplies. Hundreds of international aid workers have already arrived or are en route to Venezuela to join the search for any remaining survivors trapped in rubble. On Friday, Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodríguez confirmed that authorities had recorded 215 aftershocks in the days since the initial major quakes, adding ongoing risk to relief teams and displaced residents. A national state of emergency has been declared across the affected regions, and all major transportation links including airports, rail lines, and road transport networks have been suspended following the disaster. Thousands of people have been left homeless, creating urgent unmet demand for food, water, shelter, and emergency medical supplies.

    In a statement released alongside the announcement of the UK response, Prime Minister Keir Starmer expressed his solidarity with the Venezuelan people. “My thoughts are with the people of Venezuela following this week’s devastating earthquakes,” Starmer said. “The UK stands in solidarity with all those affected, particularly those who have lost loved ones, homes and livelihoods.”

  • Israel bans call to prayer at Hebron’s Ibrahimi Mosque for fifth day

    Israel bans call to prayer at Hebron’s Ibrahimi Mosque for fifth day

    For five straight days, Israeli forces have blocked the broadcast of the Muslim call to prayer, known as the adhan, at the Ibrahimi Mosque in the occupied West Bank city of Hebron, marking the latest escalation of Israeli efforts to reduce Palestinian access and control at the contested religious site. The ongoing ban, which began last Sunday, has been paired with punitive entry bans for two senior mosque officials: Sheikh Mutaz Abu Sneineh, the mosque’s director, and Hammam Abu Murkhiya, head of the site’s custodial team, who have been barred from entering the Ibrahimi Mosque for 12 days under Israeli military orders.

    Israeli authorities have framed the restrictions as a side effect of planned infrastructure work, saying the ban is tied to preparations to install a new roof over the mosque’s central courtyard. But Palestinian sources familiar with the situation say the real barrier to the call to prayer is deliberate Israeli access denial: the room from which the adhan is broadcast sits in the portion of the site currently under direct Israeli control, and Israeli soldiers have repeatedly refused to let the mosque’s muezzin enter the space to deliver the five daily calls to prayer. While worship is still permitted to take place inside the mosque, the adhan has been completely silenced since the ban went into effect.

    The Ibrahimi Mosque, revered by Muslims, Jews, and Christians as the burial site of the shared patriarch Abraham, has a long history of contested control in Hebron. The 1994 massacre of 29 Palestinian worshippers by an American-Israeli settler set off a major shift in the site’s administration: after the attack, Israel partitioned the holy compound, allocating nearly 60 percent of the space to Jewish worshippers and leaving the remaining portion for Muslim worshippers. Palestinian stakeholders and local activists say Israel has steadily expanded its control over the entire site in the decades since the partition, implementing a series of incremental policies designed to reduce Palestinian presence and entrench exclusive Jewish control.

    These long-running restrictions have accelerated sharply since the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war in October 2023. The new wave of measures includes stricter access controls for Palestinian worshippers, the expulsion of imams and other mosque staff, and the gradual transfer of administrative authority away from the Palestinian Authority.

    The Palestinian Authority’s Ministry of Awqaf and Religious Affairs has issued a strong condemnation of the latest restrictions, calling them “escalating repressive and arbitrary measures” targeting the holy site. The ministry said it views the entry bans on Abu Sneineh and Abu Murkhiya “with grave concern,” noting that the orders constitute a direct attack on the mosque’s officially recognized religious leadership and a deliberate attempt to remove the legally and religiously authorized administration from the site. The ministry added that the latest actions are part of a systematic, escalating policy to tighten full Israeli control over the Ibrahimi Mosque.

    Local activists emphasize that the current five-day ban is not an isolated or temporary measure tied to maintenance work, but rather the intensification of a decades-long Israeli policy. Hisham Sharabati, coordinator of the Hebron Defence Committee, explained that adhan bans have been a routine practice at the site since the mid-1990s, with the call to prayer regularly blocked on Saturdays and during Jewish religious holidays. Soldiers also frequently block muezzins from accessing the broadcast room arbitrarily, leading to dozens of missed calls to prayer every month.

    “In a single month, there can be 70 to 90 missed calls to prayer. The ban on the call to prayer has been ongoing. It’s an old policy,” Sharabati told Middle East Eye.

    Sharabati added that restrictions have grown far more severe since Israel’s current far-right government took office in late 2022. Over the years, successive Israeli governments have justified restrictions under different guises: during the COVID-19 pandemic, bans were framed as public health measures, while after the outbreak of the Gaza war, restrictions were justified on security grounds. Even when Israel relaxed gathering limits for other public spaces across the country, those relaxations were never extended to the Ibrahimi Mosque, Sharabati said. Today, Israeli soldiers routinely turn away Palestinian worshippers of all ages and genders at the site’s only Israeli-controlled entrance without explanation, further limiting Palestinian access to the holy site.

    Hebron has been under Israeli military occupation since the 1967 Six-Day War, and the broader Israeli occupation of the West Bank is widely recognized as illegal under international law.

  • Anti-drug day features public awareness effort

    Anti-drug day features public awareness effort

    On Friday, June 26, communities and public institutions across China gathered to observe the 39th International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, with a flagship series of outreach events held by the Jiangbei Compulsory Drug Rehabilitation Center in southwest China’s Chongqing municipality.

    Organized in partnership with three major stakeholders — the Chongqing Drug Rehabilitation Administration, the Chongqing Municipal Committee of the China Association for Promoting Democracy, and the Liangjiang New Area Committee of the China Democratic League — the multi-event program was designed to advance three core goals: boost widespread public understanding of the dangers of drug addiction, highlight the ongoing progress of China’s drug rehabilitation initiatives, and encourage broader community participation in supporting recovering addicts to successfully reintegrate into family life and wider society.

    International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, established by the United Nations in 1987, is observed annually on June 26 to coordinate global action to curb the illegal drug trade and reduce demand for harmful controlled substances. This year’s local events in Chongqing form part of a national ongoing effort to destigmatize addiction treatment, strengthen public prevention education, and improve outcomes for people completing rehabilitation programs. A photo of the day’s activities was provided to China Daily by event organizers.

  • Sanctioned ICC judges sue Trump in US over ‘attack on judicial independence’

    Sanctioned ICC judges sue Trump in US over ‘attack on judicial independence’

    In a historic legal challenge that tests the boundaries of executive power and the rule of law, three sitting International Criminal Court (ICC) judges have secured a court summons for former US President Donald Trump, forcing his administration to defend sweeping sanctions imposed over the tribunal’s investigations into alleged actions by US and Israeli nationals. The summons, issued Thursday by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, gives the administration 60 days to respond to the complaint filed one day prior by the three jurists: Kimberly Prost from Canada, Solomy Balungi Bossa from Uganda, and Reine Alapini-Gansou from Benin. Alongside Trump, the suit names Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (which manages the sanctions list), and OFAC director Bradley Smith as co-defendants. This marks the first time that sitting ICC judges have personally taken legal action to contest their designation under Executive Order 14203, the directive Trump signed into law on February 6, 2025. The order invoked a purported national emergency triggered by the ICC’s probes into US and Israeli citizens to authorize asset freezes and travel bans against foreign officials participating in or supporting those investigations. The three judges are not alone in facing penalties: they are among eight ICC-affiliated individuals sanctioned under the order, which has also targeted ICC prosecutor Karim Khan, his two deputies, the United Nations special rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territories, and three Palestinian human rights organizations. Each of the three plaintiffs sits on judicial panels overseeing high-stakes investigations: Prost and Bossa work on the Afghanistan probe, while Alapini-Gansou handles the file on alleged crimes in Palestinian territories. James Goldston, executive director of the Open Society Justice Initiative and co-counsel for Prost, has denounced the sanctions as “an unprecedented attack on judicial independence and the rule of law.” The measures, Goldston confirmed, have inflicted severe tangible harm on judges who have done nothing more than fulfill their official, oath-bound duties. The complaint itself describes the sanctions as “tantamount to the financial death penalty.” According to Goldston, speaking to independent outlet Middle East Eye, Prost’s personal US bank accounts have been frozen, she has lost access to conventional credit card services, and her accounts with major US-based tech and consumer firms including Amazon, Google and Expedia have been restricted or terminated entirely. Worse, Prost has effectively lost access to health coverage after her existing provider refused to process her medical claims, and no other insurer will agree to underwrite a policy for her. Before joining the ICC in 2018, Prost built a career focused on international sanctions regimes: she served as a federal prosecutor for Canada’s Department of Justice, and later as ombudsperson for the UN Security Council’s al-Qaeda sanctions committee, overseeing the exact type of punitive measures that are now being used against her. “She knows a great deal about sanctions, and in some ways it is rather extraordinary that she is now being subjected to these severe sanctions, really solely for undertaking her job as a judge seriously and professionally,” Goldston noted. The legal team has laid out three core constitutional and statutory arguments for why the executive order must be struck down entirely by the court. First, the plaintiffs argue the order far exceeds the authority Congress delegated to the president under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the legislation Trump relied on to impose the sanctions. They further contend that the penalties contradict a separate federal law, the 2002 American Service-Members’ Protection Act (ASPA), which was drafted specifically to address the risk of the ICC opening investigations into US or allied nationals who are not parties to the Rome Statute. Goldston explained that ASPA only permits the president to respond to such investigations through narrow, specific measures: providing legal representation for US citizens, submitting exculpatory evidence to the court, and defending US interests through official diplomatic and legal channels. The law does not grant any authority to impose punitive sanctions on ICC personnel. Even in the extreme scenario that an American citizen is taken into ICC custody, Goldston added, ASPA explicitly bars the executive branch from using financial or personal “inducements” to pressure the court into changing its rulings. The sanctions imposed under Executive Order 14203, he argued, fit exactly that prohibited definition. “They are trying to induce judges to refrain from deciding on the basis of facts and law, and instead take into account their own personal interests, that is, the threats to their own financial and personal well-being imposed by these sanctions,” he said. The plaintiffs also reject the administration’s claim of a national emergency justifying the order. IEEPA can only be invoked to respond to an “unusual and extraordinary” threat to US national security, but Washington’s opposition to the ICC’s exercise of jurisdiction over non-party nationals dates back nearly 30 years. President Bill Clinton first raised the same objection when he signed the Rome Statute in 2000, and earlier this year a senior US official confirmed to the United Nations that none of the concerns cited in the 2025 executive order are new, with Washington having reiterated the same position for almost three decades. Legal observers note that both Afghanistan and Palestine are ICC member states, and the Rome Statute has long enshrined the principle that the court can exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on a member state’s territory, regardless of the nationality of the perpetrator. The second core argument centers on constitutional protections for property: the asset freeze imposed on Prost and Bossa, who both hold US-based assets, violates the Fifth Amendment in two distinct ways—by depriving them of private property without due process of law, and by seizing private property without just compensation. The third argument holds that the designation of the judges violates the Administrative Procedure Act, because the penalties are “arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion.” The complaint notes that the Trump administration has failed to produce any specific, concrete evidence justifying the sanctions against the individual judges, and also neglected to weigh the severe damage the measures inflict on international accountability efforts—including ICC investigations that the US itself openly supports, such as the probes into alleged war crimes in Sudan, Libya, and Ukraine. Goldston emphasized that all three arguments revolve around the same core violation: the sanctions pressure judges to prioritize their own personal and financial security over their oath to impartially adjudicate cases based on law and facts. “The sanctions seek to compel these judges to refrain from their sworn oath, to decide cases on the basis of an impartial assessment of the facts and the law,” he said. “That is a fundamental threat to the rule of law.” This lawsuit is the fifth legal challenge to Executive Order 14203 to date. In four earlier cases challenging the order, US courts have already ruled that the directive is unconstitutional, finding it imposes unlawful restrictions on the free speech rights of individuals and organizations that cooperate with the ICC. One of those earlier successful challenges was brought on behalf of Francesca Albanese, the sanctioned UN special rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territories. This current suit, however, is the first to directly challenge the designation of sitting ICC judges. The Open Society Justice Initiative leads representation for Prost, with international law firm Foley Hoag serving as co-counsel. When asked about the prospects of the suit succeeding, Goldston said his team is confident in the strength of their arguments, but noted that the judicial process will ultimately determine the outcome. “We are hopeful that these arguments will be persuasive, but that is what the judicial process is for. We will see what the outcome is,” he said.

  • France forward Ousmane Dembélé scores a first-half World Cup hat trick in 4-1 win over Norway

    France forward Ousmane Dembélé scores a first-half World Cup hat trick in 4-1 win over Norway

    FOXBOROUGH, Mass. — Ahead of the knockout round of the World Cup, French star Ousmane Dembélé announced himself as a top contender for the tournament’s Golden Boot with a historic first-half hat trick that lifted defending champion France to a 4-1 victory over Norway in the final Group Stage match Friday.

    Dembélé found the back of the net three times in just 25 minutes of the first half, striking in the 7th, 20th, and 32nd minutes. His performance marks the first first-half World Cup hat trick in 30 years; the last such achievement came from Russian forward Oleg Salenko, who netted three first-half goals as part of his iconic five-goal game against Cameroon at the 1994 United States World Cup.

    The match opened with a near-immediate chance for France: Kylian Mbappé broke down the right flank just 21 seconds after kickoff, firing a powerful strike that rattled the crossbar past Norwegian backup goalkeeper Egil Selvik. Dembélé opened his scoring tally soon after, slotting a right-footed shot past Selvik off a perfectly placed feed from his Paris Saint-Germain teammate Mbappé. He doubled his lead 13 minutes later, creating space between three Norwegian defenders at the top of the 18-yard box and curling a left-footed shot beyond Selvik’s diving save attempt.

    Norway quickly pulled one back, as Thelo Aasgaard scored just 14 seconds after the restart following Dembélé’s second goal. But Dembélé restored France’s two-goal advantage less than nine minutes later, completing his first-half hat trick before the break. France rounded out the scoring with a late injury-time goal from young substitute Désiré Doué, capping a dominant performance that pushed the side’s total goal tally to 10 through three group matches.

    Both sides had already secured their spots in the World Cup round of 32 heading into Friday’s match, and Norway head coach Ståle Solbakken made the call to rest 10 regular starting players, including star striker Erling Haaland, to keep his squad fresh for knockout round play. Solbakken explained that the short turn-around between matches made the decision to rest key starters an obvious one.

    “The break that we had from the last game to this game was the shortest of any team. … So it’s a no-brainer,” Solbakken said. “The fans around Norway and also in the arena would have liked to see Erling. But that is not really the issue. We want to proceed as long as we can in the tournament.”

    For France, the match carried an undercurrent of emotion: head coach Didier Deschamps missed the fixture after the recent passing of his mother, Ginette Deschamps, returning to France to be with his family. Assistant coach Guy Stéphan stepped in to lead the side, and fans in attendance displayed a large banner reading “AVEC TOI DIDIER” — “With you Didier” — to show their support for Deschamps. Stéphan confirmed after the match that Deschamps would rejoin the team for training Saturday ahead of the knockout round.

    Dembélé, who claimed the 2025 Ballon d’Or as European football’s top player and now has four goals at this year’s World Cup, was subbed off in the 65th minute to rest, replaced by Bradley Barcola. In his post-match comments, the 28-year-old played down his individual achievement, emphasizing that the team’s focus remains locked on knockout round success.

    “It is a unique moment,” Dembélé said. “But the most important was to finish first of the group in the group stage, and we are focused on the round of 32, which is the most important.” He added: “We want to win all our matches, but we remain focused.”

    Historically, Dembélé’s hat trick ranks among the fastest in World Cup history. The record for the fastest tournament hat trick belongs to Hungarian striker Laszlo Kiss, who scored three goals in just 7 minutes 42 seconds as a substitute against El Salvador at the 1982 Spain World Cup. For hat tricks from the opening kickoff, the record is held by Austrian striker Erich Probst, who netted three goals in 24 minutes against Czechoslovakia at the 1954 Switzerland World Cup.

    Looking ahead, both teams will begin their knockout round campaigns on the same day next week. Norway will square off against Ivory Coast on Tuesday in Arlington, Texas, while France will face off against one of the top third-place finishers from the 2026 tournament group stage in East Rutherford, New Jersey.

    In addition to Dembélé’s three goals, Mbappé extended his strong World Cup form: the French captain now has 16 career World Cup goals and four assists across 17 tournament matches, having already scored two goals in each of France’s prior group wins against Senegal and Iraq, entering the knockout round as one of the tournament’s top offensive threats.

  • Tanzania bans political rallies ahead of planned anti-government protests

    Tanzania bans political rallies ahead of planned anti-government protests

    In a move that has reignited debates over constitutional rights and political freedom in East Africa, Tanzania’s ruling administration announced a nationwide ban on all political gatherings Friday, stepping in ahead of planned mass protests centered on disputed 2024 election results and the ongoing detention of a prominent opposition leader.

    Internal Affairs Minister Patrobas Katambi issued an official order to Police Inspector General Camillus Wambura, directing authorities to halt the processing and issuance of new permits for all political activities across the country, ending a two-year period of relaxed restrictions on opposition organizing.

    This latest policy shift reverses a 2023 executive order from President Samia Suluhu Hassan, who lifted a strict six-year ban on opposition rallies implemented by her predecessor, the late John Magufuli. The new ban comes as young Tanzanian activists prepare to launch nationwide demonstrations on July 7, where they intend to challenge Hassan’s re-election in last year’s general vote and advocate for a complete rewrite of the country’s constitution.

    The 2024 general election, which resulted in a landslide victory for Hassan’s ruling party, has been mired in controversy from the start. Tanzania’s largest main opposition party boycotted the contest entirely in protest of systemic unfairness, while the presidential candidate representing the country’s second-largest opposition bloc was blocked from appearing on the ballot ahead of voting.

    This year will mark the first post-election protests held in Tanzania since 2025, an unprecedented moment of public pushback against the administration’s election outcome. Beyond challenging the election results, protesters are demanding two key changes: the immediate release of opposition leader Tundu Lissu, who faces high-profile treason charges stemming from his calls for political reform ahead of the 2024 vote, and official accountability for the post-election violence that left at least 518 people dead, according to a previously released post-election inquiry.

    Law enforcement has already taken preemptive action, arresting multiple individuals tied to the protest organizing effort, which has been coordinated largely through social media platforms to avoid government interference. Even so, opposition and civil society leaders have pushed back aggressively against the new ban, framing it as an unconstitutional overreach of executive power.

    Boniface Mwabukusi, president of the Tanzania Law Society, emphasized that the government has no legal standing to restrict public meetings that are explicitly permitted under Tanzanian law. “We will convene to determine the legal measures we will take, both domestically and internationally, against anyone who attempts to enforce this unlawful and invalid directive in violation of the Constitution and the laws of the country,” Mwabukusi said in a statement following the ban announcement.

    Opposition parties have echoed this criticism, uniformly describing the ban as a politically motivated effort to silence dissent ahead of the planned protests. Rugemeleza Nshala, chief legal counsel for the leading opposition party Chadema, said the order was a deliberate attempt to “muzzle political freedom.” He confirmed that Chadema is currently drafting both domestic and international legal challenges to overturn the ban. Rashid Ali, shadow minister for defense, internal affairs and security for the second major opposition party ACT Wazalendo, added that the directive is just the latest in a series of government actions that violate the country’s founding constitution.

    The controversy comes amid already strained relations between Tanzania and Western governments: the United States recently imposed sanctions on the country’s national police chief over documented human rights violations connected to post-election crackdowns, adding a layer of international tension to the growing domestic political crisis.