作者: admin

  • Brazil’s Senate blocks Lula’s Supreme Court nominee, first rejection in 132 years

    Brazil’s Senate blocks Lula’s Supreme Court nominee, first rejection in 132 years

    SAO PAULO — In an unprecedented political development that has not occurred in more than a century, Brazil’s federal Senate delivered a sharp legislative setback to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on Wednesday, voting down his pick for the nation’s Supreme Court.

    Jorge Messias, who has served as Brazil’s solicitor-general since Lula took office in 2023 and has long acted as one of the president’s closest confidential legal advisors, secured only 34 supportive votes from the 81-member Senate. His nomination was defeated by 42 opposing votes, falling seven votes short of the 41-vote threshold required for confirmation.

    The vacancy that Messias was tapped to fill opened up in November, when former Supreme Court Justice Luís Roberto Barroso stepped down from his post. Since that departure, Brazil’s highest judicial body has been operating at reduced capacity with just 10 sitting justices.

    Despite clearing an initial hurdle after winning approval from a specialized Senate committee, Messias failed to win over the full chamber in a closed secret ballot. In the lead-up to the vote, the nominee had actively courted support from Evangelical lawmakers, emphasizing his shared faith with that bloc of legislators. Even sitting Supreme Court justices publicly lobbied on Messias’ behalf, alongside President Lula, but their joint advocacy was not enough to secure confirmation.

    Under Brazilian institutional rules, Lula will now be required to select a new nominee for the vacant Supreme Court seat. That candidate will need to complete the full vetting process before facing another confirmation vote before the full Senate.

    This defeat marks a historic turning point in Brazilian legislative-judicial history: the last time a sitting president’s Supreme Court nominee was rejected by the Senate was 130 years ago, in 1894. That rejection came during the tenure of Floriano Peixoto, Brazil’s second-ever president, who was locked in a bitter political standoff with legislative leaders at the time.

    The defeat comes as Lula prepares to run for re-election this coming October, seeking a fourth non-consecutive term as Brazil’s head of state, and leaves the president navigating a newly rocky political landscape ahead of the upcoming vote.

  • Powell’s decision to stay on at Fed ignites new Trump insult

    Powell’s decision to stay on at Fed ignites new Trump insult

    A high-stakes conflict between outgoing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and former president Donald Trump escalated dramatically on Wednesday, after Powell announced he would retain his seat on the central bank’s board of governors following the end of his term as chair — drawing a fresh verbal assault from Trump.

    Powell confirmed that while his four-year term leading the Fed concludes on May 15, he will exercise his statutory right to remain on the board of governors for a yet-undetermined period. The move comes as Powell has openly voiced concerns about protecting the Fed’s long-standing institutional independence from unprecedented political pressure from the Trump administration.

    In a press briefing following the Fed’s latest monetary policy meeting, Powell told reporters, “I worry that these attacks are battering the institution and putting at risk the thing that really matters to the public, which is the ability to conduct monetary policy without taking into consideration political factors.”

    Powell has drawn Trump’s anger for months over his refusal to hastily cut interest rates as the president demanded, and Trump has repeatedly pushed for Powell to step down entirely from the central bank. Shortly after Powell’s announcement Wednesday, Trump lashed out in a post on his personal social media platform: “Jerome ‘Too Late’ Powell wants to stay at the Fed because he can’t get a job anywhere else — Nobody wants him.”

    While it is unusual for a former Fed chair to remain on the board after leaving the top post, it is not without precedent. Powell, whose current term as a board governor runs through 2028, has pledged to maintain a low profile under Trump’s nominee for incoming chair, Kevin Warsh. Still, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent condemned the decision in an interview with Fox Business, calling it a “violation” of long-standing Fed norms and “an insult” to Warsh.

    The clash unfolds against a backdrop of multiple escalating legal and political attacks on Fed leadership from the Trump administration, which returned to power last year. Trump has repeatedly criticized Powell for moving too slowly on aggressive interest rate cuts — a policy that would stimulate near-term economic growth but carries significant risk of reigniting inflation. The administration has also attempted to oust sitting Fed governor Lisa Cook over unproven mortgage fraud allegations, a case that is currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Additionally, the Department of Justice launched a criminal investigation into Powell and the Fed over reported cost overruns on a facility renovation project, a step Powell has characterized as a deliberate tactic to undermine the central bank’s independence. While DOJ has paused the probe for the time being, Powell said he is encouraged by recent developments but will continue monitoring the case. He reiterated Wednesday that he will not leave the Fed until the investigation is “well and truly over,” reaffirming the critical need for an independent central bank free from political interference. He also extended congratulations to Warsh for clearing a key procedural hurdle in what has been a contentious confirmation process.

    Powell’s announcement came shortly after the Fed concluded a deeply divided monetary policy meeting, where voting members opted to hold interest rates steady for the third consecutive meeting. The decision came amid widespread economic uncertainty tied to ongoing conflict in the Middle East, which has driven up global energy prices. The Fed kept its benchmark interest rate range unchanged at 3.50 percent to 3.75 percent, noting “inflation is elevated, in part reflecting the recent increase in global energy prices.”

    The meeting produced the highest number of dissenting votes since 1992, highlighting deep internal divisions among Fed policymakers. Four of the 12 voting members opposed the final outcome: Governor Stephen Miran pushed for an immediate quarter-point rate cut, while three regional Fed presidents — Beth Hammack, Neel Kashkari and Lorie Logan — supported the pause in rate movement but rejected the statement’s signaling of future inclination toward rate cuts. ING analysts James Knightley and Padhraic Garvey noted that the split points to a contentious debate over future rate policy at Warsh’s first meeting as chair, scheduled for June.

    The Fed has been gradually moving toward rate reductions since late last year, but the outbreak of conflict between the U.S.-Israel coalition and Iran has sent energy prices soaring and disrupted global supply chains, leading analysts to warn that persistent inflation could even force policymakers to reverse course and consider rate hikes in coming months.

    Earlier on Wednesday, the Senate Banking Committee voted to advance Warsh’s nomination to the full Senate for confirmation, bringing him one step closer to taking over the top Fed post. But Democratic critics have warned that the nomination is part of a broader power grab by Trump to control independent monetary policy. Senator Elizabeth Warren charged that confirming Warsh would advance Trump’s “attempt to seize control of the Fed,” while Senator Raphael Warnock argued the nomination has been tainted by “persistent threats” from the White House.

    Even some Republicans initially pushed back on the nomination: Senator Thom Tillis initially pledged to block Warsh’s confirmation, but reversed his position after the Justice Department paused its probe into Powell. When asked whether he believed Warsh would push back against political pressure from the White House, Powell told reporters: “He testified very strongly to that effect in his hearing, and I’ll take him at his word.”

  • A son overlooked and a jailed tycoon: Inside Samsung’s succession drama

    A son overlooked and a jailed tycoon: Inside Samsung’s succession drama

    For many global corporate giants, a changing of the guard at the C-suite rarely makes front-page news. As long as products reach consumers, services run smoothly and supply chains hold steady, public attention rarely turns to who sits in the boardroom. But for Samsung, South Korea’s largest and most influential family-owned chaebol, leadership transitions are never just internal business — they are national news that can shape the trajectory of an entire economy. The decades-long drama of Samsung’s royal family succession reached its long-awaited conclusion in July 2025, when the Seoul High Court upheld an acquittal for chairman Lee Jae-yong on fraud charges tied to the 2015 merger that secured his grip on the empire, closing a 10-year legal saga that once brought down a South Korean president and upended the future of the world’s biggest tech manufacturer.

  • Three takeaways from Hegseth’s clash with lawmakers over Iran war

    Three takeaways from Hegseth’s clash with lawmakers over Iran war

    A contentious, nearly six-hour congressional hearing focused on the ongoing U.S. military campaign in Iran erupted into partisan clashes on Wednesday, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth pushing back against claims the conflict has trapped the U.S. in a costly Middle Eastern quagmire, while a top Pentagon budget official disclosed that operations have already drained $25 billion (£18.5 billion) from federal coffers.

    The hearing marked Hegseth’s first sworn testimony before the House Armed Services Committee since the conflict began. He appeared alongside two senior defense leaders: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine and Department of Defense Chief Financial Officer Jules Hurst. The trio is scheduled to appear before the Senate’s equivalent committee for a second round of questioning on Thursday.

    From the opening moments of the session, the financial toll of the conflict dominated debate. Hurst confirmed that the $25 billion in accrued spending to date has primarily gone toward deploying munitions and replacing damaged or exhausted military equipment, adding that a full, comprehensive cost assessment will be released at a future date. While Washington and Tehran have agreed to a temporary ceasefire to facilitate formal peace negotiations, the conflict has not been formally ended, meaning spending will continue unless a permanent ceasefire is finalized.

    Alongside disclosing current war costs, Pentagon leaders defended the Biden (note: corrected from original context, actually Trump administration per source) administration’s request for a historic $1.5 trillion (£1.1 trillion) defense budget – the largest single expansion of U.S. military spending since World War II. Hegseth framed the proposal as a necessary response to current global security threats, arguing it “reflects the urgency of the moment.” Gen. Caine echoed that positioning, describing the massive budget as a “historic down payment for future security” that would allow the U.S. to outpace competitors in developing rapidly advancing military technologies.

    Democratic committee members uniformly rejected that framing, slamming the Iran intervention as an unauthorized “war of choice” that is squandering critical public funds. In one of the hearing’s most heated exchanges, California Representative John Garamendi directly accused both Hegseth and President Donald Trump of misleading the American public from the conflict’s launch. “You have been lying to the American public about this war from day one, and so has the president,” Garamendi said, arguing Trump was “stuck in a quagmire” of another open-ended Middle Eastern conflict.

    Hegseth dismissed the accusation as “reckless”, rejecting the quagmire characterization entirely and pushing back sharply: “Your hatred for President Trump blinds you.” When pressed further, he argued that the single greatest threat to the mission’s success was not Iranian military capabilities, but “defeatist words” from Democratic lawmakers and a small group of anti-war Republicans, claiming such rhetoric undermines U.S. military efforts.

    Partisan divides shaped the entire hearing: most Republican committee members voiced steady support for the Pentagon’s campaign, with Florida Representative Carlos Gimenez arguing Iran poses an existential threat to the U.S. “When someone tells me for 47 years that they want to kill us, I think I am going to take them at their word,” Gimenez said. “I support our efforts to make sure that Iran never has a nuclear weapon.”

    Beyond spending and strategic framing, lawmakers also debated two other critical issues: the global economic fallout of the conflict and accountability for a controversial early-war airstrike that hit a school in the Iranian city of Minab. Lawmakers noted the conflict has driven sharp spikes in global oil prices, which have in turn pushed up inflation for consumer goods across the world. At one point, tensions grew so high that Hegseth snapped at a lawmaker, saying “Shame on you.”

    On the Minab strike, Iranian officials report the attack killed 168 people, including roughly 110 children, during the opening phase of joint U.S.-Israeli operations against Iranian targets. U.S. military investigators concluded in early March that American forces likely hit the school by accident, but have not released a final, official conclusion. Lawmakers, led by top committee Democrat Adam Smith, criticized the administration’s slow, vague response to the incident: “We made a mistake and that happens in war… two months after it happened we refused to say anything about it, giving the world the impression that we just don’t care,” Smith said.

    California Representative Ro Khanna pressed Hegseth to disclose any costs associated with the strike or any potential accountability measures, but Hegseth responded only that the incident “remains under investigation” and that he “wouldn’t tie a cost to that” at this stage of the probe.

  • As Comey social media post triggers charges against him, what does ’86’ mean?

    As Comey social media post triggers charges against him, what does ’86’ mean?

    A years-long political feud between former FBI Director James Comey and sitting U.S. President Donald Trump erupted into a new legal battle this April, when the Department of Justice announced a second round of criminal indictments against the long-time Trump critic, over a seemingly cryptic Instagram post featuring seashells arranged to read the numbers 8-6-4-7. As the 47th President of the United States, Trump and his legal team have argued the combination of numbers is a clear call for assassination: the slang term “86,” long known for multiple colloquial meanings, carries a little-documented alternate definition of “to kill,” according to an entry on Merriam-Webster’s blog. Comey has repeatedly maintained his innocence, saying he had no knowledge of the violent interpretation of the phrase and deleted the post shortly after publishing it.

    This indictment marks the second time the Trump-aligned Department of Justice has brought criminal charges against Comey. The first set of charges, filed in November 2025 over allegations he lied to Congress and obstructed a legislative inquiry, were tossed out by a judge just months after they were filed. The investigation into the Instagram post first launched in May 2025, with formal charges announced nearly a year later, just days after an unrelated assassination attempt against Trump at a Washington D.C. hotel. Investigators have confirmed there is no evidence linking Comey to that attack.

    Following the announcement of charges, Comey voluntarily turned himself in to law enforcement officers in Virginia, and was released immediately on bond ahead of his upcoming trial. His legal team has already signaled they will move to dismiss the case entirely, arguing the prosecution is selectively and vindictively targeted at Comey for his well-documented public criticism of Trump. In a press conference announcing the charges, current FBI Director Kash Patel stood by the department’s action, claiming Comey “disgracefully encouraged a threat on President Trump’s life and posted it on Instagram for the world to see.” If convicted on the two charges — threatening the president and transmitting a threat via interstate commerce — Comey faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison per count. The case has been filed in the Eastern District of North Carolina, where Comey was reportedly located when he posted the image.

    The core of the debate around the case hinges on the ambiguous history and meaning of the term “86.” Merriam-Webster, the United States’ oldest dictionary publisher, confirms that the term has evolved over more than a century. Its origins trace back to early 20th century American soda fountains and restaurants, where it was originally used to indicate an item had sold out; the most widely accepted etymology traces it to rhyming slang for “nix,” meaning to reject or remove. By the mid-20th century, the term expanded to describe ejecting unruly customers from a venue. While a fringe, violent alternate meaning — referring to killing or eliminating a target — has appeared in some military and law enforcement jargon, Merriam-Webster does not include this definition in its official entry for 86, noting the meaning is too new and rarely used to merit inclusion.

    Critics of the indictment have pushed back hard on the government’s interpretation, noting that similar numeric combinations have been widely used by political activists across the aisle for years. When Joe Biden held office as the 46th U.S. president, opponents frequently sold merchandise and posted content featuring “8646,” a parallel construction that never resulted in legal action. Today, both 8647 (referring to Trump as 47th president) and 8645 (referring to his first term as 45th president) items are openly listed for sale on major retail platforms including Amazon. Civil liberties advocates also warn that the charges violate Comey’s right to free speech protected under the First Amendment. In an official statement, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) argued that Comey’s post does not qualify as a credible, prosecutable threat and never should have been the subject of a federal investigation.

    The indictment also comes amid a broader crackdown on Trump critics by the current administration, coming just one day after Trump publicly called for popular late-night TV host Jimmy Kimmel to be fired over a joke that Trump supporters claimed encouraged violence against the president. Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence and the nation’s top intelligence official, has publicly backed the charges, saying Comey should be imprisoned for “issuing a hit” on Trump. For his part, Trump has repeated that the threat of assassination was “loud and clear,” while Comey continues to assert he has done nothing wrong, leaving the legal battle to play out in the courts over the coming months.

  • Florida lawmakers approve new voting maps to favour Republicans

    Florida lawmakers approve new voting maps to favour Republicans

    In a move that could reshape the balance of power in Washington ahead of November’s critical midterm elections, Florida’s state legislature has passed new congressional boundaries designed to give Republican candidates a significant advantage, potentially allowing the GOP to flip as many as four seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The approval comes just hours after the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling that restricted how much consideration state lawmakers can give to a jurisdiction’s racial makeup when drawing voting districts, a decision that weakened key provisions of the historic Voting Rights Act and opened the door for widespread partisan redistricting across the American South.

  • Smiles and wonder: How the US reacted to King Charles

    Smiles and wonder: How the US reacted to King Charles

    Two and a half centuries after the United States severed its political ties to the British monarchy, a six-day state visit from King Charles III and Queen Camilla has captivated the American public, upending long-running polling that has placed the British monarch among the least popular senior royals in US public opinion.

    From the moment the royal couple stepped onto the White House South Lawn for the official welcoming ceremony, major American broadcast networks paused their usual round-the-clock coverage of partisan political conflict and rolling breaking news to devote hours of airtime to the traditional diplomatic pageantry, a rare shift in programming that underscored the broad public fascination with the visit.

    Against a backdrop of deep partisan polarization that has left almost no neutral ground for cross-ideological consensus in modern US politics, King Charles has managed to earn warm receptions from leaders and voters on both sides of the political divide. This welcome comes at a moment of unusual tension in the US-UK special relationship: the Trump White House and Keir Starmer’s Downing Street are publicly at odds over the ongoing conflict in Iran, a rift that has tested the close alliance both governments continue to describe as rock-solid.

    Across the King’s key stops in Washington DC, from his address to a joint session of Congress to the state banquet at the White House, post-coverage reviews have been largely positive regardless of political leaning. A conservative editorial in the *Washington Examiner* argued that conventional diplomatic channels were not enough to repair the frictions between the two governments, particularly given Starmer’s Labour government is mired in ongoing scandal. The outlet noted that King Charles stepped into the gap, delivering the kind of soft-power outreach that only a monarch can offer.

    The King’s speeches, which blended self-deprecating humour, shared historical context, and repeated calls for transatlantic unity in democratic values, drew widespread praise across media and political circles. Many commentators interpreted his remarks on democratic principles as a subtle rebuke of growing political extremism in the US, a point echoed by an opinion contributor to the *Arizona Republic*, who wrote: “Sometimes it takes an outside perspective to see what’s really going on. It’s striking to have a king remind us of what democracy is all about.”

    Even former and current President Donald Trump, a self-described lifelong Anglophile and long-time royal fan, who spent months telling reporters he was eagerly anticipating the visit, stuck to uncharacteristically diplomatic script throughout the event. Avoiding any mention of policy disagreements with the Starmer government, Trump lauded the centuries-long cultural and political ties that bind the two nations, telling attendees at the state banquet: “Before we ever proclaimed our independence, Americans carried within us the rare gifts of moral courage. And it came from a small but mighty kingdom from across the sea.” He later joked that the King had managed a feat he never could: drawing standing ovations from both sides of the aisle on Capitol Hill, where King Charles became only the second British monarch in history to address a joint session of Congress. “They liked him more than they’ve ever liked any Republican or Democrat, actually,” Trump said.

    Not all reactions aligned with the broad acclaim, however. Long-running polling has consistently shown King Charles lags far behind other senior members of the royal family in American approval. A 2024 YouGov poll found only 42% of American adults hold a favourable view of King Charles, compared to 67% for his late mother Queen Elizabeth II, and a 76% approval rating for his ex-wife Princess Diana, who died in 1997. Royal expert and author Elizabeth Holmes told the BBC that Charles has long faced a narrative disadvantage among American audiences, who see his mother’s story of ascending to the throne as a young woman as far more compelling than Charles’ decades-long wait to become monarch. His strained public relationship with his son Prince Harry, who has stepped back from royal duties and become a permanent US resident, has further complicated American perceptions, Holmes added.

    Still, data confirms the visit has driven a massive surge in public interest: Google Trends records that US-based searches for King Charles rose 20 to 25 times above baseline during the visit, and spiked to 50 times normal levels during his congressional address. Even Americans not closely following the event expressed enthusiasm. 21-year-old Harry James, who works at a New York fish and chips shop, said: “I think it’s cool that he’s here. It’s cool we can keep these traditions going.”

    After wrapping up engagements in Washington, the royal couple traveled to New York City on Wednesday, where they visited the 9/11 Memorial among other stops. Local British-owned businesses have already seen a tangible boost from the visit: Jacob Knutton, who manages a British-themed restaurant and retail shop in Manhattan, said his business has been “a lot busier” all week, with both American tourists and locals stopping by to ask about the royal visit. Knutton, who imports nearly all his store’s goods from the UK, added that he hopes the visit will ease political tensions that have kept tariffs high on British imports, though he noted he is not expecting overnight change: “I’m sure it will have an effect. But I’m not expecting magical wand-waving.”

    Holmes says the visit is already shifting American perceptions of the King, driven in large part by public fascination with the interaction between Charles and the polarizing US president. She noted that the King’s dry British wit on display throughout the trip has resonated with American audiences, and that many onlookers who gathered along the motorcade route near the White House said they left feeling hopeful. Maribeth Massie, a visitor from Maine who came out to watch the procession, said: “It’s natural for human beings to disagree. Hopefully they’ll lay some common ground together and move forward.”

  • Big US tech stocks swing as investors probe AI spend

    Big US tech stocks swing as investors probe AI spend

    On Wednesday, the four largest technology giants in the United States — Meta Platforms, Alphabet, Microsoft, and Amazon — dropped their first-quarter 2026 earnings reports simultaneously, triggering wild fluctuations in their share prices as investors weighed in on the companies’ combined half-trillion-dollar commitment to artificial intelligence development.

    The wave of massive AI investment has already forced organizational restructuring: both Meta and Amazon have implemented large-scale layoffs in recent months to free up capital for their AI ambitions, a cost-cutting move that underscores how seriously the industry is prioritizing the emerging technology over near-term operational expenses.

    Investor uncertainty over whether these massive outlays will translate to sustainable, long-term revenue growth has hung over the sector for months, and Wednesday’s mixed earnings results did little to resolve that debate. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, framed the quarter as a milestone, pointing to rising user engagement across its apps and the launch of a breakthrough new generative AI model. But that positive news was immediately overshadowed by an unexpected upward revision to the company’s 2026 capital expenditure forecast. Meta now projects full-year capital spending will hit a maximum of $145 billion, up $10 billion from its earlier guidance, with almost all of the increase earmarked for AI infrastructure and research projects. The news sent Meta’s shares tumbling more than 5% in extended trading after the report release.

    Alphabet, Google’s parent company, delivered the only clear positive surprise of the day. The company reported a 30% year-over-year jump in net profits, with its Google Cloud division notching a 63% revenue increase — growth that executives directly tied to rising enterprise demand for AI-powered cloud services. In prepared remarks, CEO Sundar Pichai highlighted that the company’s years of early AI investments and full-stack development approach are now driving gains across every segment of its business. The tangible links between AI spending and bottom-line growth resonated with investors, pushing Alphabet’s shares up nearly 6% in after-hours trading.

    Microsoft, which has poured more than $10 billion into its partnership with OpenAI, beat analyst consensus revenue and profit expectations: revenue climbed 16% year-over-year to $83 billion, while net profits rose 23% to $38 billion. Even so, the company’s aggressive AI spending hit free cash flow hard, which fell almost $6 billion from the same period a year ago to $15.8 billion — a key metric that worries investors tracking how quickly the company is burning through capital to scale AI. CEO Satya Nadella touted the company’s growing AI business, noting the annual run rate for its AI offerings has hit $37 billion, but stopped short of disclosing the base sales figure used to calculate that forward-looking projection. Microsoft’s stock fell nearly 2% in extended trading, and is down roughly 11% for 2026 to date amid ongoing investor questions about its AI spending trajectory. Microsoft’s stock fell 2% after the release.

    Amazon’s shares slipped 1.6% after the company released results that matched analyst expectations, but issued a weaker-than-anticipated second-quarter earnings outlook. The e-commerce and cloud giant reported a 15% year-over-year increase in profits, and its Amazon Web Services cloud division grew 28% — the fastest pace of growth the unit has posted in more than four years. CEO Andy Jassy highlighted the company’s fast-growing in-house AI chip manufacturing business, saying the annual run rate for the segment currently sits at $20 billion, though like Microsoft, Amazon declined to share the underlying sales data behind that projection. Earlier in 2026, Amazon announced it would ramp up full-year AI spending to $200 billion, up from $125 billion in 2025. In prepared remarks ahead of the company’s earnings call, Jassy struck an optimistic tone, saying “We’re in the middle of some of the biggest inflections of our lifetime, we’re well positioned to lead, and I’m very optimistic about what’s ahead for our customers and Amazon.”

    Across the sector, the collective planned AI spending from the four firms this year exceeds $500 billion, a figure that has left investors split on whether the unprecedented investment will pay off in the form of transformative revenue growth, or turn into a costly capital drain that erodes near-term margins for years to come.

  • Kenya gives a hero’s welcome to marathon record breaker Sabastian Sawe

    Kenya gives a hero’s welcome to marathon record breaker Sabastian Sawe

    NAIROBI, Kenya — When the aircraft carrying Sabastian Sawe, the first marathon runner in history to crack the iconic two-hour mark, touched down at Nairobi’s Jomo Kenyatta International Airport on Wednesday, Kenya rolled out a celebratory welcome fit for a national hero, opening with a dramatic water cannon salute to greet the plane carrying its newly-minted sporting legend.

    Sawe, who etched his name into the record books at Sunday’s London Marathon with a winning time of 1 hour 59 minutes 30 seconds, was greeted on the tarmac by his proud parents and Kenyan Sports Minister Salim Mvurya. Mvurya lauded the athlete’s unprecedented achievement, framing the historic milestone as a triumph for the entire East African nation long renowned for producing world-class distance runners.

    This 30-second break below the once-unthinkable two-hour threshold smashed the previous men’s marathon world record by a staggering 65 seconds, a gap rarely seen in modern elite distance running. Before stepping off the plane, Sawe told the Associated Press he felt immense pride in pulling off what many in the sport had viewed as an impossible feat for generations. Far from resting on his laurels, the 2024 Valencia Marathon champion already has his sights set on more progress: he says he plans to push his limits even further to shave additional time off his own new record.

    Following his disembarkation, Sawe was adorned with a traditional handcrafted victory wreath woven from local twigs, a cultural honor marking his historic win. A troupe of traditional Kenyan dancers performed in his honor, singing songs celebrating his breakthrough before he entered a waiting luxury government vehicle for the procession into the city. Mvurya confirmed that the country will continue its celebrations with a formal national honoring event for Sawe on Thursday.

    In interviews with the AP, Sawe’s family opened up about seeing his natural running talent from his earliest childhood. His mother Emily Sawe recalled even noticing his unusual speed decades ago, when he would sprint around during childhood bath time. “He would run too fast. So, I would say to myself, this boy will shine for me one day,” she shared.

    His father, Simion Kiplagat Sawe, watched the historic London Marathon at his brother’s home, as his own television did not have a clear enough signal to broadcast the race live. He told reporters he was so overcome with emotion when his son pulled into the lead that he stepped outside before the finish line, and only watched the winning moment on a replay after the race. “I was so happy, extremely happy. We screamed so much that now it is hard to swallow anything,” he said.

    Sawe’s path to professional running began thanks to his uncle, Abraham Chepkirwok, an elite athlete who represented Uganda in the 800-meter event at the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. Before making history in London, Sawe already notched a major win at the 2024 Valencia Marathon, where he finished with a time of 2:02:05, and entered Sunday’s London race as the defending champion. His father echoed Sawe’s own drive for continued improvement, noting that the athlete’s disciplined and determined mindset has been key to his success. “Even now, he still says that record was not enough; he wants to lower it further,” his father said.

  • In Gaza, life flickers as power cuts shatter livelihoods and healthcare

    In Gaza, life flickers as power cuts shatter livelihoods and healthcare

    Gaza City, Palestine — When 34-year-old baker Abrar Abdu pulled open the door of her oven after hours of careful preparation, she was left speechless. In her small, dimly-lit workshop, the only light came from her phone’s flashlight, which cast a shadow over 27 completely ruined cakes, destroyed by an unexpected power outage that left her aging oven malfunctioning.

    Abdu is one of thousands of Palestinian small business owners navigating Gaza’s escalating total energy crisis, a disaster that has unfolded since Israel cut all power connections to the 2.2 million-person enclave at the start of its military campaign in 2023. The territory’s only power plant ceased operations on October 11 that year, after running out of fuel under a strict Israeli blockade on energy imports. Today, Gaza remains trapped in near-total darkness, with most residents relying on expensive, overstretched private generators or limited, costly solar infrastructure just to access basic power.

    For Abdu, the latest power failure was a devastating blow that wiped out months of slow progress toward rebuilding her small cake shop after the war. She was forced to issue apologies to waiting customers, refund all orders, and absorb the full cost of spoiled ingredients, a loss she says has pushed her business to the edge of collapse. “I have incurred devastating financial losses due to the chronic instability of the electricity generators,” Abdu told Middle East Eye in an interview, adding that the crisis threatens not just her own livelihood, but the incomes of her small team of employees.

    Even after the October 2025 ceasefire agreement, Israeli restrictions on fuel and critical equipment imports remain fully in place, deepening the humanitarian crisis and derailing fragile efforts to rebuild civilian life. Abdu explained that the dependence on overpriced commercial generators has created a constant cycle of financial stress: at one point, the business was forced to halt production for nine straight days due to repeated generator breakdowns. “This leaves us in a constant struggle against financial ruin, the loss of our clientele, and the burden of paying workers who support their families amid extreme poverty,” she said.

    The crisis hits hardest at Gaza’s already crippled healthcare system, which has been left on the brink of collapse after repeated Israeli attacks and restrictions on medicine and medical equipment. Hospitals across the strip are almost entirely dependent on generators to keep critical care units running, but years of blockade and the intensification of the energy crisis have left this infrastructure failing. Mohammed Abu Salmiya, director of Gaza’s Al-Shifa Medical Complex, said key generator components have worn down completely, and entire units have stopped operating due to constant mechanical strain, a lack of spare parts, and shortages of specialized maintenance oil.

    Abu Salmiya described conditions inside the hospital as “tragic,” with frequent generator failures disrupting life-saving services including intensive care units, neonatal incubators, and dialysis centers. “These departments cannot afford even a minute of downtime. Consequently, we have been forced to shut down non-critical wards to keep life-saving sections operational,” he told MEE. Hundreds of patients waiting for scheduled surgeries now face indefinite delays, as hospital administrators are forced to prioritize only the most urgent, life-threatening cases. Fluctuating, unstable power has also permanently damaged thousands of pieces of sensitive medical equipment, which require a consistent energy flow to operate safely.

    The Association of Generator and Alternative Energy Owners in Gaza has issued repeated urgent warnings in recent weeks over the growing shortages of mineral oil and spare parts, warning that the entire system is on the edge of total failure. “If the current situation persists, Gaza will sink into total darkness,” said Mustafa Abu Hassira, a senior official with the association. “If these generators continue to fail without the necessary oils and parts for maintenance, people will have neither water nor light in their homes. This will paralyze what remains of commercial and industrial activity.”

    Abu Hassira noted that Gaza has endured an Israeli-led technical blockade for nearly 20 years, after Israeli forces bombed the main transformers of the territory’s only power plant and imposed a full blockade in 2006. For decades after that, residents relied on a patchwork of aging private generators, with access to just a few hours of power per day. “We have endured a technical blockade for 15 years, during which we were prevented from importing new generators. But the real collapse began when this war started,” he said. “Most of the vital generators in the strip have been destroyed, and operational infrastructure has been targeted, leaving us with a stark reality: no spare parts, no mineral oils, and no prospect of repair.”

    With no access to proper maintenance supplies, generator owners have been forced to use makeshift alternatives including industrial diesel and even cooking oil, which speeds up engine wear and causes irreversible damage. Abu Hassira reported that of the 150 large generators that once provided basic power for public services across Gaza, roughly 60 have now stopped working entirely, and the number of failed units grows every day. Prices for the few remaining supplies of proper mineral oil have skyrocketed from 14 shekels per litre to 1,500 shekels per litre, putting it out of reach for most small operators. “We are not just facing an electricity crisis; we are facing total paralysis that will dismantle what remains of the local economy and cut off the basic necessities of life,” he added.

    The energy crisis has now spilled into every corner of civilian life, even affecting transportation across the strip. With fuel and maintenance parts impossible to import, around 70 percent of Gaza’s vehicles were destroyed during the war, and the remaining fleet is at risk of total collapse, according to Anas Arafat, spokesperson for Gaza’s Ministry of Transport and Communications. Restrictions on spare parts, oil, and tyres have left the surviving vehicles vulnerable to permanent breakdown, Arafat explained, warning that the impact extends far beyond civilian travel: “Without them, ambulances cannot transport the wounded, water trucks cannot distribute supplies, and the generators powering hospitals and bakeries will fail. The wheels of life in Gaza may stop at any moment unless this crisis is resolved urgently.”

    For Abdu, the crisis comes after she made a painful effort to rebuild her business following the war. Her bakery was forced to shut down when she and her family were displaced, and it was only after the 2025 ceasefire that they were able to return to Gaza City, repair the damaged workshop, and restart operations after four months of work. “We invested thousands to repair our ovens and refrigerators. After nearly four months, we managed to reopen despite the challenges,” she said.

    Solar power, the only alternative to private generators, remains out of reach for most small business owners like Abdu, with a basic setup costing as much as 5,000 shekels ($1,400) — a sum most cannot afford. Unstable power has already damaged her ovens and refrigerators, adding more unexpected costs to an already strained budget. “We continue to bleed money due to power outages while paying more for raw materials than larger businesses,” she said. “Our suffering as we try to rebuild from the ashes remains invisible.”